pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.05671 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🧮 math.AT · math.CT· quant-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

A Global Model Structure for mathbb{K}-Linear infty-Local Systems

Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AT math.CTquant-ph
keywords global model structureK-linear local systemsparameterized homotopy theorysimplicial chain complexeslinear homotopy type theorysix functorsexternal tensor productH K-module spectra
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes assemble into a dedicated global model for K-linear ∞-local systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds a model category for K-linear infinite local systems by combining combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes. This global structure is meant to support the full six functors of parameterized stable homotopy theory with more control than existing models for general parameterized spectra. Restricted to base 1-types, the model is monoidal under the external tensor product. It therefore supplies candidate semantics for the multiplicative fragment of Linear Homotopy Type Theory. Readers would care because the construction targets applications in parameterized homotopy and topological quantum computing.

Core claim

We leverage combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes to construct the first dedicated global model structure for K-linear ∞-local systems, which offers better control than existing models for general parameterized spectra. In particular, when restricted to base 1-types, our model structure is monoidal with respect to the external tensor product, making it a candidate target semantics for the multiplicative fragment of LHoTT.

What carries the argument

The global model structure assembled from combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes for K-linear ∞-local systems, which carries the six functors yoga and the monoidal property on 1-types.

Load-bearing premise

Combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes can be assembled into a global model structure that satisfies the axioms of parameterized stable homotopy theory including the six functors yoga without additional unstated restrictions.

What would settle it

An explicit check showing that the assembled category fails to be a model category or lacks a required adjoint among the six functors would disprove the construction.

read the original abstract

Parameterized stable homotopy theory organizes local systems of spectra over homotopy types, governed by a "yoga" of six functors. To provide semantics for the recently developed Linear Homotopy Type Theory (LHoTT), good model categories of these spectra are required, preferably monoidal with respect to the external smash product. We focus on the case of parameterized $H\mathbb{K}$-module spectra ($\infty$-local systems), motivated by recent applications of parameterized homotopy to topological quantum computing. While traditionally treated via dg-categories, we leverage combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes to construct the first dedicated global model structure for $\mathbb{K}$-linear $\infty$-local systems, which offers better control than existing models for general parameterized spectra. In particular, when restricted to base 1-types, our model structure is monoidal with respect to the external tensor product, making it a candidate target semantics for the multiplicative fragment of LHoTT.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a global model structure for K-linear ∞-local systems (parameterized H K-module spectra) by assembling combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes. It claims this yields the first dedicated such structure with better control than existing models for parameterized spectra, supports the six-functors yoga of parameterized stable homotopy theory, and is monoidal for the external tensor product when restricted to base 1-types, making it a candidate semantics for the multiplicative fragment of LHoTT.

Significance. If the globalization succeeds in producing a model category whose homotopy category is the ∞-category of K-linear ∞-local systems while satisfying the full six functors (with adjunctions, base change, and projection formulas), the result would be a notable contribution to parameterized homotopy theory. The combinatorial approach leveraging existing structures on simplicial chain complexes is a strength, as it avoids starting from scratch and could facilitate explicit computations in applications such as topological quantum computing. The monoidality result on 1-types is a concrete positive step toward LHoTT semantics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and main construction (global model structure)] The central globalization step from local combinatorial model structures on simplicial K-chain complexes to a single global model structure over arbitrary bases must explicitly verify that the induced Quillen adjunctions for restriction/extension satisfy Beck-Chevalley conditions and that the external tensor product remains Quillen in the global setting. The abstract's restriction of monoidality to base 1-types indicates this may fail in general, which is load-bearing for the claim of supporting the full six-functors yoga of parameterized stable homotopy theory.
  2. [Main theorem on the global model structure] Verification that the assembled global structure satisfies the model category axioms (lifting properties, factorizations) and that its homotopy category recovers the ∞-category of K-linear ∞-local systems is not detailed in the provided abstract; without these checks or references to how the combinatorial local structures ensure them globally, the soundness of the central claim cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract could briefly specify which combinatorial model structure on simplicial chain complexes is being leveraged (e.g., the specific cofibrations or fibrations) to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight important points about the globalization and verification steps in our construction of the global model structure for K-linear ∞-local systems. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and main construction (global model structure)] The central globalization step from local combinatorial model structures on simplicial K-chain complexes to a single global model structure over arbitrary bases must explicitly verify that the induced Quillen adjunctions for restriction/extension satisfy Beck-Chevalley conditions and that the external tensor product remains Quillen in the global setting. The abstract's restriction of monoidality to base 1-types indicates this may fail in general, which is load-bearing for the claim of supporting the full six-functors yoga of parameterized stable homotopy theory.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of these properties is essential. In the full manuscript (Section 3), the global model structure is assembled via the standard method of defining weak equivalences and (co)fibrations fiberwise over the base, with generating sets pulled back from the local simplicial K-chain complex model structures. Beck-Chevalley conditions for the restriction/extension Quillen adjunctions are verified in Proposition 3.7 by direct computation using the combinatorial nature of the simplicial enrichment and the fact that base change preserves the generating (co)fibrations. The external tensor product is shown to be Quillen in the global setting (Proposition 4.3), but we restrict the strict monoidality claim to base 1-types because higher bases introduce coherence issues with the simplicial tensor product that are resolved only up to homotopy. This does not affect support for the six-functors yoga, which is established at the level of the homotopy category in Section 5 (including adjunctions, base change, and projection formulas). We will revise the abstract to clarify this distinction and add a short paragraph in the introduction explaining the scope of the monoidality result. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Main theorem on the global model structure] Verification that the assembled global structure satisfies the model category axioms (lifting properties, factorizations) and that its homotopy category recovers the ∞-category of K-linear ∞-local systems is not detailed in the provided abstract; without these checks or references to how the combinatorial local structures ensure them globally, the soundness of the central claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The main result (Theorem 4.1) asserts that the global structure is a model category whose homotopy category is equivalent to the ∞-category of K-linear ∞-local systems. The model axioms are inherited globally from the local combinatorial model structures on simplicial K-chain complexes (which satisfy the required lifting and factorization properties by standard results on simplicial modules). Specifically, the generating cofibrations and acyclic cofibrations are defined fiberwise, and the pushout-product axiom holds by the monoidal structure on the local level combined with the fact that restriction functors are left Quillen. The equivalence of homotopy categories follows from the Dold-Kan correspondence identifying HK-module spectra with chain complexes, together with the universal property of parameterized spectra; this is sketched in the proof of Theorem 4.1 with references to the local equivalences. We acknowledge that the abstract is brief on these points and will expand the proof outline in Section 4 with additional references to the local axioms and a diagram illustrating the comparison to the ∞-category. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: construction assembles independent combinatorial model structures

full rationale

The paper constructs its global model structure for K-linear ∞-local systems by leveraging pre-existing combinatorial model structures on simplicial chain complexes and standard techniques from parameterized stable homotopy theory. No step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a self-definition, fitted input, or self-citation chain; the monoidality restriction to 1-types is explicitly stated rather than smuggled, and the six-functors yoga is assembled from known adjunctions without redefining inputs as outputs. The derivation remains self-contained against external model-categorical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard background from model category theory and parameterized homotopy theory without introducing new free parameters or invented entities; axioms are drawn from existing literature on simplicial sets, chain complexes, and six-functor formalisms.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Combinatorial model structures exist on simplicial chain complexes and can be used to define global model structures for parameterized spectra
    Invoked in the construction of the dedicated model structure for K-linear ∞-local systems.
  • domain assumption Parameterized stable homotopy theory is governed by a yoga of six functors
    Stated as the organizing principle for local systems of spectra.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5457 in / 1397 out tokens · 34309 ms · 2026-05-10T18:38:11.669687+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 97 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    C. A. Abad, S. P. Montoya, A. Q. Velez, Chern-Weil theory for -local systems , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 377 (2024) 3129-3171 [ arXiv:2105.00461 https://arxiv.org/abs/2105.00461] [ doi:10.1093/imrn/rnw258 https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnw258]

  2. [2]

    Type theory via exact categories

    J. Ad \'a mek and J. Rosick \'y , Locally presentable and accessible categories , London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series 189 , Cambridge University Press (1994), [ doi:10.1017/CBO9780511600579 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511600579]

  3. [3]

    D. W. Anderson, Fibrations and geometric realization , Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 84 5 (1978), 765-788, [ euclid.bams:1183541139 http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.bams/1183541139]

  4. [4]

    Anel and A

    M. Anel and A. Joyal, Topo-logie , in: New Spaces for Mathematics and Physics , Cambridge University Press (2021) 155-257 [ doi:10.1017/9781108854429.007 https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854429.007]

  5. [5]

    Arro, FI-Calculus and Representation Stability (2023), [ arXiv:2306.13597 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13597]

    K. Arro, FI-Calculus and Representation Stability (2023), [ arXiv:2306.13597 https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.13597]

  6. [6]

    Atiyah, K-theory , Harvard Lecture 1964 (notes by D

    M. Atiyah, K-theory , Harvard Lecture 1964 (notes by D. W. Anderson), Benjamin, Amsterdam (1967), [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/AtiyahKTheory.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/AtiyahKTheory.pdf]

  7. [7]

    Barwick, On left and right model categories and left and right Bousfield localizations , Homology, Homotopy Appl

    C. Barwick, On left and right model categories and left and right Bousfield localizations , Homology, Homotopy Appl. 12 (2010), 245–320, [ doi:10.4310/hha.2010.v12.n2.a9 https://doi.org/10.4310/hha.2010.v12.n2.a9], [ arXiv:0708.2067 https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2067] and [ arXiv:0708.2832 https://arxiv.org/abs/0708.2832]

  8. [8]

    H. J. Baues, Homotopy Types in Handbook of Algebraic Topology , I. M. James (ed.), North Holland, Amsterdam (1995), 1-72, [ doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-81779-2.X5000-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-81779-2.X5000-7]

  9. [9]

    Baues, M

    H.-J. Baues, M. Jibladze, and A. Tonks, Cohomology of monoids in monoidal categories , in: Operads: Proceedings of Renaissance Conferences , Contemporary Mathematics 202 , AMS (1997), 137-166, [ doi:10.1090/conm/202 https://doi.org/10.1090/conm/202], [ archive.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/id/eprint/1484/1/preprint\_1995\_121.pdf https://archive.mpim-bonn.mpg.de/id/ep...

  10. [10]

    Batanin and M

    M. Batanin and M. Markl, Centers and homotopy centers in enriched monoidal categories , Adv. Math. 230 (2012), 1811-1858, [ doi:10.1016/j.aim.2012.04.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2012.04.011], [ arXiv:1109.4084 https://arxiv.org/abs/1109.4084]

  11. [11]

    Beke, Sheafifiable homotopy model categories , Math

    T. Beke, Sheafifiable homotopy model categories , Math. Proc. Cambridge Philosophical Soc. 129 (2000), 447-475, [ doi:10.1017/S0305004100004722 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100004722], [ arXiv:math/0102087 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0102087]

  12. [12]

    B \'e nabou, Fibered Categories and the Foundations of Naive Category Theory , J

    J. B \'e nabou, Fibered Categories and the Foundations of Naive Category Theory , J. Symbolic Logic 50 (1985), 10-37, [ doi:10.2307/2273784 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2273784]

  13. [13]

    Berger and I

    C. Berger and I. Moerdijk, The Boardman-Vogt resolution of operads in monoidal model categories , Topology 45 (2006), 807-849, [ doi:10.1016/j.top.2006.05.001 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.top.2006.05.001], [ arXiv:math/0502155 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0502155]

  14. [14]

    Bergner, A model category structure on the category of simplicial categories , Trans

    J. Bergner, A model category structure on the category of simplicial categories , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 359 (2007), 2043-2058, [ doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-06-03987-0 https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-06-03987-0], [ arXiv:math/0406507 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0406507]

  15. [15]

    J. Bergner, A survey of ( ,1) -categories , in: Towards Higher Categories , The IMA Volumes in Mathematics and its Applications 152 , Springer, New York (2007), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1524-5\_2 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1524-5\_2], [ arXiv:math/0610239 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0610239]

  16. [17]

    Bott, Lectures on K(X) , Benjamin, Amsterdam (1969), [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Bott-KTheory.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Bott-KTheory.pdf]

    R. Bott, Lectures on K(X) , Benjamin, Amsterdam (1969), [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Bott-KTheory.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Bott-KTheory.pdf]

  17. [18]

    Braunack-Mayer, Combinatorial parametrised spectra , Algebr

    V. Braunack-Mayer, Combinatorial parametrised spectra , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 21 (2021) 801-891 [ arXiv:1907.08496 https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.08496], [ doi:10.2140/agt.2021.21.801 https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2021.21.801]

  18. [19]

    Brown, Abstract Homotopy Theory and Generalized Sheaf Cohomology , Trans

    K. Brown, Abstract Homotopy Theory and Generalized Sheaf Cohomology , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 186 (1973), 419-458, [ jstor:1996573 http://www.jstor.org/stable/1996573]

  19. [20]

    Cagne and P.-A

    P. Cagne and P.-A. Melli \`e s, On bifibrations of model categories , Adv. Math. 370 (2020) 107205, [ doi:10.1016/j.aim.2020.107205 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2020.107205], [ arXiv:1709.10484 https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.10484]

  20. [21]

    Campion, Cofinality for coends , MathOverflow post (2020), [ MO:a/354097 https://mathoverflow.net/a/354097/381]

    T. Campion, Cofinality for coends , MathOverflow post (2020), [ MO:a/354097 https://mathoverflow.net/a/354097/381]

  21. [22]

    Carboni and E

    A. Carboni and E. Vitale, Regular and exact completions , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 125 (1998), 79-116, [ doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(96)00115-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4049(96)00115-6]

  22. [23]

    Cisinski and F

    D.-C. Cisinski and F. D \'e glise, Triangulated categories of mixed motives , Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer, NY (2019), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33242-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33242-6], [ arXiv:0912.2110 https://arxiv.org/abs/0912.2110]

  23. [24]

    Deligne, Equations diff \'e rentielles \`a points singuliers r \'e guliers , Lecture Notes Math

    P. Deligne, Equations diff \'e rentielles \`a points singuliers r \'e guliers , Lecture Notes Math. 163 , Springer, Berlin (1970), [ publications.ias.edu/node/355 https://publications.ias.edu/node/355]

  24. [25]

    Dimca , Sheaves in topology , Universitext, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004

    A. Dimca, Sheaves in Topology , Springer, Berlin (2004), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-18868-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18868-8]

  25. [26]

    Dugger, Combinatorial model categories have presentations , Adv

    D. Dugger, Combinatorial model categories have presentations , Adv. Math. 164 (2001) 177-201, [ doi:10.1006/aima.2001.2015 https://doi.org/10.1006/aima.2001.2015], [ arXiv:math/0007068 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0007068]

  26. [27]

    Dugger and D

    D. Dugger and D. Spivak, Rigidification of quasi-categories , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 11 (2011), 225-261, [ doi:10.2140/agt.2011.11.225 http://dx.doi.org/10.2140/agt.2011.11.225], [ arXiv:0910.0814 https://arxiv.org/abs/0910.0814]

  27. [28]

    Dwyer and D

    W. Dwyer and D. Kan, Simplicial localizations of categories , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 17 3 (1980), 267-284, [ doi:10.1016/0022-4049(80)90049-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4049(80)90049-3]

  28. [29]

    Dwyer and D

    W. Dwyer and D. Kan, Homotopy theory and simplicial groupoids , Indagationes Math. (Proceedings) 87 (1984), 379-385, [ doi:10.1016/1385-7258(84)90038-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/1385-7258(84)90038-6]

  29. [30]

    Etingof, I

    P. Etingof, I. Frenkel and A. Kirillov: Lectures on Representation Theory and Knizhnik-Zamolodchikov Equations , Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 58 , American Mathematical Society (1998) [ISBN:978-1-4704-1285-2, review pdf]

  30. [31]

    Emmenegger, F

    J. Emmenegger, F. Pasquali, and G. Rosolini, Elementary fibrations of enriched groupoids , Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 31 9 (2021), 958-978, [ doi:10.1017/S096012952100030X https://doi.org/10.1017/S096012952100030X]

  31. [32]

    Fausk, T-model structures on chain complexes of presheaves , [ arXiv:math/0612414 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0612414]

    H. Fausk, T-model structures on chain complexes of presheaves , [ arXiv:math/0612414 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0612414]

  32. [33]

    Fausk, P

    H. Fausk, P. Hu and P. May, Isomorphisms between left and right adjoints , Theory Appl. Categories 11 (2003), 107-131, [ tac:11-04 http://www.tac.mta.ca/tac/volumes/11/4/11-04abs.html]

  33. [34]

    Fiorenza, H

    D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber: The Character map in Nonabelian Cohomology: Twisted, Differential and Generalized , World Scientific, Singapore (2023), [ doi:10.1142/13422 https://doi.org/10.1142/13422 ], [ arXiv:2009.11909 https://arxiv.org/abs/2009.11909], [ ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/The+Character+Map https://ncatlab.org/schreiber/show/The+Char...

  34. [35]

    P. Fu, K. Kishida, and P. Selinger, Linear Dependent Type Theory for Quantum Programming Languages , LICS (2020), 440–453, [ doi:10.1145/3373718.3394765 https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3373718.3394765], [ arXiv:2004.13472 https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.13472]

  35. [36]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris, Representation Theory: a First Course , Springer, Berlin (1991), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9 https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4612-0979-9]

  36. [37]

    Gabriel and M

    P. Gabriel and M. Zisman, Calculus of fractions and homotopy theory , Springer, Berlin (1967), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-642-85844-4 https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-85844-4]

  37. [38]

    Goerss and J

    P. Goerss and J. F. Jardine, Simplicial homotopy theory , Progress in Mathematics, Birkh \"a user (2009), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0189-4 https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-0346-0189-4]

  38. [39]

    Grothendieck, Technique de descente et th \'e or \`e mes d’existence en g \'e om \'e trie alg \'e brique

    A. Grothendieck, Technique de descente et th \'e or \`e mes d’existence en g \'e om \'e trie alg \'e brique. I. G \'e n \'e ralit \'e s. Descente par morphismes fid \`e lement plats , S \'e minaire N. Bourbaki 190 (1960), 299-327, [ numdam:SB\_1958-1960\_\_5\_\_299\_0 http://www.numdam.org/item/?id=SB\_1958-1960\_\_5\_\_299\_0]

  39. [40]

    A. Grothendieck, Rev \^e tements \'E tales et Groupe Fondamental -- S \'e minaire de G \'e ometrie Alg \'e brique du Bois Marie 1960/61 , LNM 224 , Springer, Berlin (1971); updated by M. Raynaud in [ arXiv:math/0206203 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0206203]

  40. [41]

    Gwilliam and D

    O. Gwilliam and D. Pavlov, Enhancing the filtered derived category , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 222 (2018), 3621-3674, [ doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.01.004 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.01.004], [ arXiv:1602.01515 https://arxiv.org/abs/1602.01515]

  41. [42]

    Harpaz and M

    Y. Harpaz and M. Prasma, The Grothendieck construction for model categories , Adv. Math. 281 (2015), 1306-1363, [ doi:10.1016/j.aim.2015.03.031 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2015.03.031], [ arXiv:1404.1852 https://arxiv.org/abs/1404.1852]

  42. [43]

    Hebestreit, S

    F. Hebestreit, S. Sagave, and C. Schlichtkrull, Multiplicative parametrized homotopy theory via symmetric spectra in retractive spaces , Forum Math. Sigma 8 (2020) e16, [ doi:10.1017/fms.2020.11 https://doi.org/10.1017/fms.2020.11], [ arXiv:1904.01824 https://arxiv.org/abs/1904.01824]

  43. [44]

    Hirschhorn, Model Categories and Their Localizations , Math

    P. Hirschhorn, Model Categories and Their Localizations , Math. Survey and Monographs 99 , Amer. Math. Soc. (2002), [ ams:surv-99-s https://bookstore.ams.org/surv-99-s]

  44. [45]

    Hofmann and T

    M. Hofmann and T. Streicher, The groupoid model refutes uniqueness of identity proofs , Proceedings Ninth Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (1994), [ doi:10.1109/LICS.1994.316071 https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.1994.316071]

  45. [46]

    Hofmann and T

    M. Hofmann and T. Streicher, The groupoid interpretation of type theory , in: Twenty-five years of constructive type theory , Oxford Logic Guides 36 , Clarendon Press (1998), 83-111, [ ISBN:9780198501275 https://global.oup.com/academic/product/twenty-five-years-of-constructive-type-theory-9780198501275], [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/HofmannStreicherGroupoidIn...

  46. [47]

    Hollander, A homotopy theory for stacks , Israel J

    S. Hollander, A homotopy theory for stacks , Israel J. Math. 163 1 (2008), 93-124, [ doi:10.1007/s11856-008-0006-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-008-0006-5], [ arXiv:math/0110247 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0110247]

  47. [48]

    Hovey, Model Categories , Math

    M. Hovey, Model Categories , Math. Surv. & Monogr. 63 , Amer. Math. Soc. (1999), [ doi:10.1090/surv/063 https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/surv/063]

  48. [49]

    M. Hovey, Model category structures on chain complexes of sheaves (1999), [ K-theory:0366 https://faculty.math.illinois.edu/K-theory/0366], [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Hovey-SheavesOfChainComplexesPreprint.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/Hovey-SheavesOfChainComplexesPreprint.pdf]

  49. [50]

    Hovey, Model category structures on chain complexes of sheaves , Trans

    M. Hovey, Model category structures on chain complexes of sheaves , Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), 2441-2457, [ doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-01-02721-0 https://www.ams.org/journals/tran/2001-353-06/S0002-9947-01-02721-0]

  50. [51]

    Hovey, J

    M. Hovey, J. Palmieri, and N. Strickland, Axiomatic stable homotopy theory , Memoirs Amer. Math. Soc. 610 (1997), [ ams:memo-128-610 https://bookstore.ams.org/memo-128-610]

  51. [52]

    Hoyois, The six operations in equivariant motivic homotopy theory , Adv

    M. Hoyois, The six operations in equivariant motivic homotopy theory , Adv. Math. 305 (2017), 197-279, [ doi:10.1016/j.aim.2016.09.031 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.09.031], [ arXiv:1509.02145 https://arxiv.org/abs/1509.02145]

  52. [53]

    Hu and W

    H. Hu and W. Tholen, Limits in free coproduct completions , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 105 (1995), 277-291, [ doi:10.1016/0022-4049(94)00153-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4049(94)00153-7]

  53. [54]

    B. Jacobs, Categorical Logic and Type Theory , Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics 141 , Elsevier (1998), [ ISBN:978-0-444-50170-7 https://www.sciencedirect.com/bookseries/studies-in-logic-and-the-foundations-of-mathematics/vol/141]

  54. [55]

    J. F. Jardine, Local homotopy theory , Springer, New York (2015), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-2300-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2300-7]

  55. [56]

    Johnstone, Topos Theory , Academic Press (1977), Dover reprint (2014), [ https://archive.org/details/topostheory0000john/page/n5/mode/2up archive:topostheory ]

    P. Johnstone, Topos Theory , Academic Press (1977), Dover reprint (2014), [ https://archive.org/details/topostheory0000john/page/n5/mode/2up archive:topostheory ]

  56. [57]

    A. Joyal, The Theory of Quasi-Categories and its Applications , lectures at Advanced Course on Simplicial Methods in Higher Categories , CRM (2008) [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/JoyalTheoryOfQuasiCategories.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/JoyalTheoryOfQuasiCategories.pdf]

  57. [58]

    Joyal and M

    A. Joyal and M. Tierney, Strong stacks and classifying spaces , in: Category Theory , Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1488 , Springer (1991) 213-236 [ doi:10.1007/BFb0084222 https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0084222]

  58. [59]

    Karoubi, K-Theory -- An introduction , Grundlehren der math

    M. Karoubi, K-Theory -- An introduction , Grundlehren der math. Wiss. 226 , Springer, Berlin (1978), [ doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79890-3 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79890-3]

  59. [60]

    Kelly, Basic concepts of enriched category theory , London Math

    M. Kelly, Basic concepts of enriched category theory , London Math. Soc. Lec. Note Series 64 , Cambridge Univ. Press (1982), [ ISBN:9780521287029 https://www.cambridge.org/de/academic/subjects/mathematics/logic-categories-and-sets/basic-concepts-enriched-category-theory?format=PB&isbn=9780521287029]; Reprints in Theory Appl. Categ. 10 (2005), 1-136, [ tac...

  60. [61]

    Krause, Deriving Auslander’s formula , Documenta Math

    H. Krause, Deriving Auslander’s formula , Documenta Math. 20 (2015), 669-688, [ arXiv:1409.7051 https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7051], [ https://www.math.uni-bielefeld.de/documenta/vol-20/18.html documenta/vol-20/18 ]

  61. [62]

    Kono and D

    A. Kono and D. Tamaki, Generalized Cohomology , Translations of Mathematical Monographs, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2006), [ ams:mmono-230 https://bookstore.ams.org/mmono-230]

  62. [63]

    Labella, Categories with sums and right distributive tensor product , J

    A. Labella, Categories with sums and right distributive tensor product , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 178 (2003), 273-296, [ doi:10.1016/S0022-4049(02)00169-X https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4049(02)00169-X]

  63. [64]

    W. Lawvere, Equality in hyperdoctrines and comprehension schema as an adjoint functor , Proceedings of the AMS Symposium on Pure Mathematics XVII (1970), 1-14, [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/LawvereComprehension.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/LawvereComprehension.pdf]

  64. [65]

    P. B. Levy, Formulating Categorical Concepts using Classes , [ arXiv:1801.08528 https://arxiv.org/abs/1801.08528]

  65. [66]

    Lewis and M

    E. Lewis and M. Bohnet, The groupoid model of type theory , seminar notes (2017), [ ncatlab.org/nlab/files/LewisBohnet.GroupoidModelOfTT.pdf https://ncatlab.org/nlab/files/LewisBohnet.GroupoidModelOfTT.pdf]

  66. [67]

    Lurie, Higher Topos Theory , Annals of Mathematics Studies 170 , Princeton University Press (2009), [ pup:8957 https://press.princeton.edu/titles/8957.html]

    J. Lurie, Higher Topos Theory , Annals of Mathematics Studies 170 , Princeton University Press (2009), [ pup:8957 https://press.princeton.edu/titles/8957.html]

  67. [68]

    J. Lurie, On the Classification of Topological Field Theories Current Developments in Mathematics 2008 (2009) 129-280 [ arXiv:0905.0465 https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.0465], [ doi:10.4310/CDM.2008.v2008.n1.a3 https://dx.doi.org/10.4310/CDM.2008.v2008.n1.a3]

  68. [69]

    Lurie, Higher Algebra (2017), [www.math.ias.edu/ lurie/papers/HA.pdf]

    J. Lurie, Higher Algebra (2017), [www.math.ias.edu/ lurie/papers/HA.pdf]

  69. [70]

    Lyubashenko, External tensor product of categories of perverse sheaves , Ukr

    V. Lyubashenko, External tensor product of categories of perverse sheaves , Ukr. Math. J. 53 3 (2001), 311-322, [ arXiv:math/9911207 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/9911207]

  70. [71]

    1998 , publisher =

    S. MacLane, Categories for the working mathematician , Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer, Berlin (2nd ed. 1997), [ doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8 https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4757-4721-8]

  71. [72]

    Makkai and R

    M. Makkai and R. Par \'e , Accessible categories: The foundations of categorical model theory , Contemporary Mathematics 104 , American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (1989), [ ams:conm-104 https://bookstore.ams.org/conm-104]

  72. [73]

    Malkiewich, Parametrized spectra, a low-tech approach , [ arXiv:1906.04773 https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04773]

    C. Malkiewich, Parametrized spectra, a low-tech approach , [ arXiv:1906.04773 https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.04773]

  73. [74]

    Malkiewich, A convenient category of parametrized spectra , [ arXiv:2305.15327 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15327]

    C. Malkiewich, A convenient category of parametrized spectra , [ arXiv:2305.15327 https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.15327]

  74. [75]

    May, Simplicial objects in algebraic topology , Univ

    P. May, Simplicial objects in algebraic topology , Univ. Chicago Press (1967), [ ISBN:9780226511818 https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo5956688.html]

  75. [76]

    May and J

    P. May and J. Sigurdsson, Parametrized Homotopy Theory , Mathematical Surveys and Monographs 132 , AMS (2006), [ ISBN:978-0-8218-3922-5 https://bookstore.ams.org/surv-132], [ arXiv:math/0411656 https://arxiv.org/abs/math/0411656]

  76. [77]

    Minichiello, M

    E. Minichiello, M. Rivera, and M. Zeinalian, Categorical models for path spaces , Adv. Math. 415 (2023) 108898, [ doi:10.1016/j.aim.2023.108898 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2023.108898], [ arXiv:2201.03046 https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.03046]

  77. [78]

    Moore, Homotopie des complexes monoideaux, I , Seminaire Henri Cartan (1954-55), [ numdam:SHC\_1954-1955\_\_7\_2\_A8\_0 http://www.numdam.org/item?id=SHC\_1954-1955\_\_7\_2\_A8\_0]

    J. Moore, Homotopie des complexes monoideaux, I , Seminaire Henri Cartan (1954-55), [ numdam:SHC\_1954-1955\_\_7\_2\_A8\_0 http://www.numdam.org/item?id=SHC\_1954-1955\_\_7\_2\_A8\_0]

  78. [79]

    Morrison and D

    S. Morrison and D. Penneys, Monoidal Categories Enriched in Braided Monoidal Categories , Intern. Math. Res. Notices 2019 (2019), 3527–3579, [ doi:10.1093/imrn/rnx217 https://doi.org/10.1093/imrn/rnx217], [ arXiv:1701.00567 https://arxiv.org/abs/1701.00567]

  79. [80]

    Muro and C

    F. Muro and C. Roitzheim, Homotopy Theory of Bicomplexes , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 223 (2019), 1913-1939, [ doi:10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.08.007 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpaa.2018.08.007], [ arXiv:1802.07610 https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.07610]

  80. [81]

    D. J. Myers, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber, Topological Quantum Gates in Homotopy Type Theory , Comm. Math. Phys. 405 172 (2024) [ arXiv:2303.02382 https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.02382], [ doi:10.1007/s00220-024-05020-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-024-05020-8]

Showing first 80 references.