pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06026 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-07 · 🧮 math.AP · math.DG

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Gauge Symmetry Breaking in the Asymptotic Analysis of Self Dual Yang-Mills-Higgs SU(2) Monopoles

Tristan Rivi\`ere
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.DG
keywords Yang-Mills-Higgs monopolesgauge symmetry breakingCoulomb gaugeharmonic mapsconcentration compactnessFaddeev-Skyrme functionalasymptotic analysisrelaxed energies
0
0 comments X

The pith

Adding an L2 gauge-mass term to the Yang-Mills-Higgs model forces minimizers to converge to harmonic maps into the 2-sphere.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies the SU(2) self-dual Yang-Mills-Higgs Lagrangian in three dimensions after adding a gauge-mass term given by the L2 norm of the connection. This term breaks gauge invariance so that every critical point satisfies the global Coulomb condition. For any prescribed unit-length Higgs boundary data, the minimizers in the large-mass regime converge to harmonic maps from the ball into the 2-sphere that match the boundary data. The convergence occurs in a concentration-compactness sense: it is strong away from a closed one-dimensional rectifiable set. When the coupling constant is chosen sufficiently large, the minimal energy of these configurations approaches the Brezis-Coron-Lieb relaxed harmonic-map energy associated with the same boundary data.

Core claim

By adding a gauge-mass term equal to the L2 norm of the connection to the SU(2) Self-Dual Yang-Mills-Higgs Lagrangian, gauge invariance is broken and all critical points automatically satisfy the global Coulomb condition. In the large-mass asymptotic, minimizers converge to harmonic maps into S^2 that extend the given boundary Higgs data; this convergence is subject to concentration-compactness phenomena and is strong away from a one-dimensional rectifiable closed concentration set. For a sufficiently large coupling constant the limiting minimal energy converges to the minimal Brezis-Coron-Lieb relaxed harmonic-map energy for the same boundary data.

What carries the argument

The Coulomb-Yang-Mills-Higgs Functional obtained by adding the L2 norm of the connection to the original Lagrangian, which enforces the global Coulomb gauge condition and allows control of the large-mass asymptotic.

Load-bearing premise

The added L2 gauge-mass term must globally force the Coulomb condition for all critical points, and there must exist a coupling constant large enough that the energy limit equals the Brezis-Coron-Lieb value.

What would settle it

A family of explicit boundary data and a sequence of minimizers for which the energy remains bounded away from the Brezis-Coron-Lieb value no matter how large the coupling constant is chosen, or for which the convergence fails to be strong outside every one-dimensional rectifiable set.

read the original abstract

We consider the $SU(2)$ Self-Dual Yang Mills Higgs Lagrangian in 3 dimension. By adding a ''Gauge Mass'' term to this YMH Lagrangian in the form of $L^2$ norm of the connection we break the gauge invariance and critical points are automatically fulfilling globally the Coulomb condition. We study the so called ``large mass asymptotic'', which has the effect of ''squeezing'' the monopoles. For any unit Higgs field data at the boundary we prove that minimizers of this Coulomb-Yang-Mills-Higgs Functional converge to harmonic maps into ${\mathbb S}^2$ extending this data. This asymptotic moreover is subject to concentration conpactness phenomena and the convergence is strong away from a 1 dimensional rectifiable closed concentration set. Then we prove that, having chosen a large enough coupling constant, the limiting minimal energy is converging towards the minimal Brezis-Coron-Lieb relaxed harmonic map energy for this boundary data. In the second part of the paper we examine a different asymptotic regime characterised by overloading monopoles. In this regime we prove that asymptotically, the magnetic field becomes exclusively longitudinal with a $U(1)$ abelian component along the Higgs Field while the Higgs field itself converges to a smooth absolute minimizer of a relaxation of the Faddeev-Skyrme functional of maps from ${\mathbb B}^3$ into ${\mathbb S}^2$. In the third part of the paper we study the behaviour of these configurations when the parameter in front of the Fadeev-Skyrme component respectively goes to zero and $+\infty$. In the first case one recovers the Brezis Coron Lieb relaxed energy at the limit while in the second case the minimal limiting energy is converging towards the minimal Dirichlet energy of maps into ${\mathbb S}^3$ whose projection by the Hopf fibration is equal to the fixed boundary data.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers the SU(2) self-dual Yang-Mills-Higgs Lagrangian in three dimensions. By adding an L² gauge-mass term on the connection, gauge invariance is broken so that critical points satisfy the Coulomb condition globally. In the large-mass asymptotic, minimizers of the resulting Coulomb-Yang-Mills-Higgs functional converge to harmonic maps into S² extending given unit boundary data; the convergence is strong away from a one-dimensional rectifiable closed concentration set, and with a sufficiently large coupling constant the minimal energy approaches the Brezis-Coron-Lieb relaxed harmonic-map energy. The paper also treats an overloading-monopole regime in which the magnetic field becomes longitudinal with a U(1) component along the Higgs field, the Higgs field converges to a minimizer of a relaxed Faddeev-Skyrme functional, and the limits of the Faddeev-Skyrme coefficient as it tends to zero or infinity recover the Brezis-Coron-Lieb energy and the Dirichlet energy of maps into S³ whose Hopf projection matches the boundary data, respectively.

Significance. If the gauge-fixing argument and the concentration-compactness analysis are made rigorous, the work would supply a variational route from gauged monopoles to harmonic maps and relaxed energies, extending concentration-compactness techniques to a gauge-fixed Yang-Mills-Higgs setting and furnishing explicit links to the Brezis-Coron-Lieb theory.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and introduction] Abstract and §1 (gauge-mass term): the assertion that the added ∫|A|² term forces every critical point to satisfy the global Coulomb condition is load-bearing for the entire asymptotic reduction. The first variation with respect to the connection produces only a weak (distributional) form of the non-abelian divergence condition; without an a-priori regularity theorem guaranteeing that this weak equation upgrades to the strong Coulomb gauge everywhere (including where the Higgs field vanishes), the subsequent identification of minimizers with harmonic maps into S² loses its justification.
  2. [Large-mass asymptotic theorem] Main large-mass theorem (energy identification): the statement that a sufficiently large coupling constant exists so that the limiting energy equals the Brezis-Coron-Lieb value is asserted without an explicit lower bound or existence argument. Because this constant controls both the squeezing of monopoles and the passage to the relaxed energy, its construction must be supplied; otherwise the claim remains conditional on a post-hoc choice whose size is not controlled by the preceding estimates.
  3. [Concentration compactness analysis] Concentration-compactness section: the claim that the concentration set is one-dimensional and rectifiable is essential for the strong-convergence statement away from that set. The manuscript invokes standard compactness tools, but must indicate precisely how the rectifiability follows from the energy bounds once the gauge-mass term is present; without this step the geometric description of the defect set remains incomplete.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: 'concentration conpactness' is a typographical error and should read 'concentration compactness'.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: inconsistent spelling of the Skyrme term ('Faddeev-Skyrme' versus 'Fadeev-Skyrme'); adopt a single convention throughout.
  3. [Preliminaries] Notation: the precise definition of the Coulomb-Yang-Mills-Higgs functional, including the precise placement of the gauge-mass term and the boundary conditions on the Higgs field, should be stated explicitly before the first theorem.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive major comments. We address each point below and indicate the revisions planned for the next version of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and introduction] Abstract and §1 (gauge-mass term): the assertion that the added ∫|A|² term forces every critical point to satisfy the global Coulomb condition is load-bearing for the entire asymptotic reduction. The first variation with respect to the connection produces only a weak (distributional) form of the non-abelian divergence condition; without an a-priori regularity theorem guaranteeing that this weak equation upgrades to the strong Coulomb gauge everywhere (including where the Higgs field vanishes), the subsequent identification of minimizers with harmonic maps into S² loses its justification.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that the Euler-Lagrange equation for the connection yields the Coulomb condition only in the weak (distributional) sense. The manuscript currently invokes this weak form directly for the asymptotic analysis. To strengthen the argument, we will add a dedicated lemma in Section 2 establishing that critical points satisfy the strong Coulomb gauge globally. The proof will proceed by elliptic regularity away from the zero set of the Higgs field, followed by a bootstrap and unique continuation argument across the zero set that exploits the SU(2) structure and the self-dual equations. This addition will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Large-mass asymptotic theorem] Main large-mass theorem (energy identification): the statement that a sufficiently large coupling constant exists so that the limiting energy equals the Brezis-Coron-Lieb value is asserted without an explicit lower bound or existence argument. Because this constant controls both the squeezing of monopoles and the passage to the relaxed energy, its construction must be supplied; otherwise the claim remains conditional on a post-hoc choice whose size is not controlled by the preceding estimates.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit lower bound improves the statement. In the current proof, the coupling constant is chosen larger than a quantity depending on the boundary data, the Sobolev embedding constants, and the energy upper bounds obtained from the concentration-compactness analysis. We will revise the theorem statement and its proof to display this explicit threshold (constructed from the preceding estimates) and verify that it is finite and independent of the mass parameter. The revised version will therefore contain a constructive existence argument for the constant. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Concentration compactness analysis] Concentration-compactness section: the claim that the concentration set is one-dimensional and rectifiable is essential for the strong-convergence statement away from that set. The manuscript invokes standard compactness tools, but must indicate precisely how the rectifiability follows from the energy bounds once the gauge-mass term is present; without this step the geometric description of the defect set remains incomplete.

    Authors: The referee is right that the passage from energy bounds to rectifiability of the defect set needs to be spelled out explicitly when the gauge-mass term is present. The gauge-mass term is quadratic and does not change the leading-order monotonicity formula or the blow-up analysis; rectifiability therefore follows from the same varifold compactness and tangent-cone arguments used in the Brezis-Coron-Lieb theory. We will insert a short paragraph in the concentration-compactness section that recalls the relevant monotonicity identity, notes that the extra term is controlled by the energy bound, and cites the standard rectifiability theorem for stationary varifolds with bounded mass. This clarification will be added in the revision. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: variational minimization and compactness arguments are independent of the paper's own inputs

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by adding an L2 gauge-mass term to break invariance, then minimizing the resulting Coulomb-Yang-Mills-Higgs functional. Convergence to harmonic maps S^2 away from a rectifiable set, followed by identification of the limiting energy with the Brezis-Coron-Lieb relaxation, rests on standard concentration-compactness, lower-semicontinuity, and known harmonic-map theory. No equation reduces by construction to a fitted parameter defined inside the paper, no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the author's prior work, and the Coulomb condition is asserted as a direct consequence of the added term rather than presupposed. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the existence of minimizers for the modified functional and on standard compactness results in three-dimensional Sobolev spaces; the mass, coupling and Faddeev-Skyrme coefficients are treated as free parameters that are sent to limiting values.

free parameters (3)
  • gauge mass parameter
    Sent to infinity in the large-mass squeezing regime; its value is not derived from first principles.
  • coupling constant
    Required to be chosen sufficiently large for the energy to match the Brezis-Coron-Lieb value.
  • Faddeev-Skyrme coefficient
    Sent to zero and to plus infinity in the third part of the paper.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Existence of minimizers for the Coulomb-Yang-Mills-Higgs functional
    Invoked to study their asymptotic behavior in all three regimes.
  • standard math Standard concentration-compactness and rectifiability results in 3D
    Used to control the 1-dimensional concentration set and strong convergence away from it.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5646 in / 1775 out tokens · 61075 ms · 2026-05-10T18:21:42.232201+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Some lifting and approximation properties for maps in $W^{1,2}(\mathbb{B}^3;\mathbb{S}^2)$

    math.AP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    W^{1,2} maps u from the 3-ball to S^2 admit a Hopf lift to S^3 precisely when u^*ω_{S^2} is exact, and this condition permits smooth approximations preserving the exactness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A note on Riesz potentials

    Adams, R. “A note on Riesz potentials.” Duke Math. J. 42 (1975), no. 4, 765-778

    1975

  2. [2]

    Brownian motion and Harnack inequality for Schr¨ odinger operators

    Aizenman, M.; Simon, B. Brownian motion and Harnack inequality for Schr¨ odinger operators. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 35 (1982), no. 2, 209-273

    1982

  3. [3]

    Singularities of energy minimizing maps from the ball to the sphere: examples, counterexamples, and bounds

    Almgren, Frederick J., Jr.; Lieb, Elliott H. Singularities of energy minimizing maps from the ball to the sphere: examples, counterexamples, and bounds. Ann. of Math. (2) 128 (1988), no. 3, 483-530

    1988

  4. [4]

    Auckly, Dave; Kapitanski, Lev Holonomy and Skyrme’s model. Comm. Math. Phys. 240 (2003), no. 1-2, 97-122

    2003

  5. [5]

    A characterization of maps inH 1(B3,S 2) which can be approximated by smooth maps

    Bethuel, F. A characterization of maps inH 1(B3,S 2) which can be approximated by smooth maps. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 7 (1990), no. 4, 269-286

    1990

  6. [6]

    Acta Math

    Bethuel, Fabrice The approximation problem for Sobolev maps between two manifolds. Acta Math. 167 (1991), no. 3-4, 153-206 133

    1991

  7. [7]

    Relaxed energies for harmonic maps

    Bethuel, Fabrice; Brezis, Ha¨ ım ; Coron, Jean-Michel “Relaxed energies for harmonic maps”, in: Progress in nonlinear differential equations and their applications, vol. 4, Birh¨ auser (1990), 37-52 (Paris 1988)

    1990

  8. [8]

    Bethuel, Fabrice; Brezis, Ha¨ ım; H´ elein, Fr´ ed´ eric Ginzburg-Landau vortices. Progr. Nonlinear Differ- ential Equations Appl., 13 Birkh¨ auser Boston, Inc., Boston, MA, 1994

    1994

  9. [9]

    Bethuel, Fabrice; Rivi` ere, Tristan Vortices for a variational problem related to superconductivity. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 12 (1995), no. 3, 243-303

    1995

  10. [10]

    Brenier, Yann Hidden convexity in some nonlinear PDEs from geometry and physics. J. Convex Anal. 17 (2010), no. 3-4, 945-959

    2010

  11. [11]

    Atti Accad

    Brezis, Ha¨ ım Some of my favorite open problems. Atti Accad. Naz. Lincei Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. 34 (2023), no. 2, 307-335

    2023

  12. [12]

    Harmonic maps with defects

    Brezis, Ha¨ ım ; Coron, Jean-Michel; Lieb, Elliot “Harmonic maps with defects”, Comm. Math. Phys. 107 n. 4 (1986), 649-705

    1986

  13. [13]

    Eilenberg, Samuel; Harrold, O. G., Jr. Continua of finite linear measure. I. Amer. J. Math. 65 (1943), 137-146

    1943

  14. [14]

    A direct variational approach to Skyrme’s model for meson fields

    Esteban, Maria J. A direct variational approach to Skyrme’s model for meson fields. Comm. Math. Phys. 105 (1986), no. 4, 571-591

    1986

  15. [15]

    Fadel, Daniel; Nagy, Akos; Oliveira, Goncalo The asymptotic geometry ofG 2−monopoles. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 303 (2024), no. 1521

    2024

  16. [16]

    Real flat chains, cochains and variational problems

    Federer, H. “Real flat chains, cochains and variational problems.” Indiana Univ. Math. J. 24 (1974/75), 351-407

    1974

  17. [17]

    Minimal Spheres fromS 3 intoS 2

    Gianocca, Matilde “Minimal Spheres fromS 3 intoS 2” Master Thesis ETH Z¨ urich. 2021

    2021

  18. [18]

    Soucek, J

    Giaquinta, M.; Modica, G. ; Soucek, J. Cartesian currents and variational problems for mappings into spheres. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 16 (1989), no. 3, 393-485

    1989

  19. [19]

    Liquid crystals: relaxed energies, dipoles, singular lines and singular points

    Giaquinta, M.; Modica, G.; Soucek, J. Liquid crystals: relaxed energies, dipoles, singular lines and singular points. Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci. (4) 17 (1990), no. 3, 415-437

    1990

  20. [20]

    Giaquinta, Mariano; Modica, Giuseppe; Soucek, Jiri Cartesian currents in the calculus of variations. II. Variational integrals. Ergeb. Math. Grenzgeb. (3), 38 Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998

    1998

  21. [21]

    Hardt and F.-H

    R. Hardt and F.-H. Lin, A remark onH 1 mappings. Manuscripta Math. 56 (1986), no. 1, 1-10

    1986

  22. [22]

    Translated from the 1996 French original

    H´ elein, Fr´ ed´ eric Harmonic maps, conservation laws and moving frames. Translated from the 1996 French original. With a foreword by James Eells. Second edition. Cambridge Tracts in Math., 150 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2002

    1996

  23. [23]

    Structure of static gauge theories

    Jaffe, Arthur; Taubes, Clifford Vortices and monopoles. Structure of static gauge theories. Progr. Phys., 2 Birkh¨ auser, Boston, MA, 1980

    1980

  24. [24]

    Li, Yang The large mass limit ofG 2 and Calabi-Yau monopoles arXiv:2503.12075

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Lin, Fanghua Gradient estimates and blow-up analysis for stationary harmonic maps, Ann. of Math. (2), 149(3) (1999), 785-829. 134

    1999

  26. [26]

    Lin, Longzhi Uniformity of harmonic map heat flow at infinite time. Anal. PDE 6 (2013), no. 8, 1899-1921

    2013

  27. [27]

    Lin, Fang-Hua and Wang, Changyou Harmonic and Quasi-harmonic Spheres, Comm. Anal. Geom., 7(2) (1999), 397-429

    1999

  28. [28]

    Analysis and Geometry, Volume 10, Number 2, 341-375, 2002

    Lin, Fang-Hua; Wang, Changyou Harmonic and Quasi-Harmonic Spheres, Part II, Communications in. Analysis and Geometry, Volume 10, Number 2, 341-375, 2002

    2002

  29. [29]

    World Scientific Publishing Co

    Moser, Roger Partial regularity for harmonic maps and related problems. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2005

    2005

  30. [30]

    Marchuk, Nikolay; Shirokov, Dmitry Constant solutions of Yang-Mills equations and generalized Proca equations. J. Geom. Symmetry Phys. 42 (2016), 53-72

    2016

  31. [31]

    Moser, Roger AnL p regularity theory for harmonic maps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367 (2015), no. 1, 1-30

    2015

  32. [32]

    Davide Parise, Alessandro Pigati, Daniel Stern Nonabelian Yang-Mills-Higgs and Plateau’s problem in codimension three arXiv:2502.07756

    work page arXiv

  33. [33]

    Petrache, Mircea ; Rivi` ere, Tristan Global gauges and global extensions in optimal spaces. Anal. PDE 7 (2014), no. 8, 1851-1899

    2014

  34. [34]

    Pigati, Alessandro; Stern, Daniel Minimal submanifolds from the abelian Higgs model. Invent. Math. 223 (2021), no. 3, 1027-1095

    2021

  35. [35]

    Acta Math

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Everywhere discontinuous harmonic maps into spheres. Acta Math. 175 (1995), no. 2, 197-226

    1995

  36. [36]

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Line vortices in the U(1)-Higgs model.(English summary) ESAIM Contrˆ ole Optim. Calc. Var. 1 (1995/96), 77-167

    1995

  37. [37]

    Rivi` ere, TristanMinimizing fibrations and p-harmonic maps in homotopy classes fromS 3 intoS 2. Comm. Anal. Geom. 6 (1998), no. 3, 427-483

    1998

  38. [38]

    S´ eminaire Bourbaki, Vol

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Ginzburg-Landau vortices: the static model. S´ eminaire Bourbaki, Vol. 1999/2000 Ast´ erisque No. 276 (2002), 73-103

    1999

  39. [39]

    Rivi` ere, Tristan A lower-epiperimetric inequality for area-minimizing surfaces. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 57 (2004), no. 12, 1673-1685

    2004

  40. [40]

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Conservation laws for conformally invariant variational problems. Invent. Math. 168 (2007), no. 1, 1-22

    2007

  41. [41]

    Rivi` ere, Tristan A viscosity method in the min-max theory of minimal surfaces. Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes ´Etudes Sci. 126 (2017), 177-246

    2017

  42. [42]

    Geometric analysis in honor of Gang Tian’s 60th birthday, 305-379

    Rivi` ere, Tristan The variations of Yang-Mills Lagrangian. Geometric analysis in honor of Gang Tian’s 60th birthday, 305-379. Progr. Math., 333 Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2020

    2020

  43. [43]

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Harmonic maps fromS 3 intoS 2 with low Morse index. J. Differential Geom. 125 (2023), no. 1, 173-185

    2023

  44. [44]

    Functional Analysis 2

    Rivi` ere, Tristan “Functional Analysis 2” ETH Course 2026 https://metaphor.ethz.ch/x/2026/fs/401- 3462-00L/ 135

    2026

  45. [45]

    Differential Geom

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Harmonic maps fromS3 intoS 2 with low Morse index J. Differential Geom. 125(1): 173-185

  46. [46]

    Rivi` ere, Tristan Minmax Methods in Geometric Analysis 2025 https://people.math.ethz.ch/ riviere/lecture-rome-overview-minmax

    2025

  47. [47]

    Pure Appl

    Rivi` ere Tristan and Struwe Michael, Partial regularity for harmonic maps and related problems, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 61 (2008), no. 4, 451-463

    2008

  48. [48]

    Rubakov and A.N

    V.A. Rubakov and A.N. Tavkhelidze, Stable anomalous states of superdense matter in gauge theories Phys. Lett. B165 (1985) 109-112

    1985

  49. [49]

    Sandier, Etienne; Serfaty, Sylvia Global minimizers for the Ginzburg-Landau functional below the first critical magnetic field. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e C Anal. Non Lin´ eaire 17 (2000), no. 1, 119-145

    2000

  50. [50]

    Nuclear Phys

    Schmid, Matthias; Shaposhnikov, Mikhail Anomalous abelian solitons. Nuclear Phys. B 775 (2007), no. 3, 365-389

    2007

  51. [51]

    Schoen, Richard; Uhlenbeck, Karen A regularity theory for harmonic maps. J. Differential Geometry 17 (1982), no. 2, 307-335

    1982

  52. [52]

    Schoen, Richard; Uhlenbeck, Karen Boundary regularity and the Dirichlet problem for harmonic maps. J. Differential Geom. 18 (1983), no. 2, 253-268

    1983

  53. [53]

    Schoen, Richard; Uhlenbeck, Karen Regularity of minimizing harmonic maps into the sphere. Invent. Math. 78 (1984), no. 1, 89-100

    1984

  54. [54]

    Serfaty, Sylvia Local minimizers for the Ginzburg-Landau energy near critical magnetic field. I. Commun. Contemp. Math. 1 (1999), no. 2, 213-254

    1999

  55. [55]

    Serfaty, Sylvia Local minimizers for the Ginzburg-Landau energy near critical magnetic field. II. Commun. Contemp. Math. 1 (1999), no. 3, 295-333

    1999

  56. [56]

    Serfaty, Sylvia Stable configurations in superconductivity: uniqueness, multiplicity, and vortex- nucleation. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 149 (1999), no. 4, 329-365

    1999

  57. [57]

    Sil, Swarnendu Topology of weak G-bundles via Coulomb gauges in critical dimensions. Comm. Anal. Geom. 32 (2024), no. 3, 791-835

    2024

  58. [58]

    Sub-Riemannian geometry

    Strichartz, Robert S. Sub-Riemannian geometry. J. Differential Geom. 24 (1986), no. 2, 221-263

    1986

  59. [59]

    Connections withL p bounds on curvature

    Uhlenbeck, Karen K. Connections withL p bounds on curvature. Comm. Math. Phys. 83 (1982), no. 1, 31-42

    1982

  60. [60]

    Zhou, Y.: Fractional Sobolev extension and imbedding. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 367(2), 959-979 (2015) 136

    2015