pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.06749 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · physics.plasm-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Particle-acceleration mechanisms in multispecies relativistic plasmas

Alejandro Cruz-Osorio, Claudio Meringolo, Luciano Rezzolla, Mario Imbrogno, Sergio Servidio

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE physics.plasm-ph
keywords particle accelerationrelativistic turbulencemagnetic reconnectionmultispecies plasmasrelativistic pressure tensorblack hole jetskinetic plasma simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

In relativistic turbulence, particle energization occurs at reconnection current sheets where the divergence of the pressure tensor aligns with particle velocity, favoring electrons over positrons.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper conducts the first kinetic simulations of special-relativistic turbulence in plasmas containing electrons, positrons, and protons with realistic mass ratios and varying positron fractions. It uses a novel generalized Ohm's law to track how electric fields arise in reconnection sites that form naturally within the turbulence. The central result is that acceleration is powered by the divergence of the relativistic pressure tensor, which points along the local particle velocity and transfers energy efficiently. Because of the mass difference, this process systematically gives electrons more energy gain than positrons. The finding matters for predicting the nonthermal radiation produced in black-hole accretion flows and relativistic jets.

Core claim

We demonstrate, for the first time, that energization occurs at reconnection current sheets driven by the divergence of the relativistic pressure tensor, which locally aligns with the particle velocity and leads to an efficient energy transfer. The imbalance between electrons and positrons systematically favors electron acceleration, highlighting the necessity of realistic multispecies modeling to capture the nonthermal contributions in accretion flows and relativistic jets from black holes.

What carries the argument

The novel generalized Ohm's law for multispecies relativistic plasmas, which isolates the divergence of the relativistic pressure tensor as the driver of electric fields and energy transfer at self-emerging reconnection current sheets.

If this is right

  • Nonthermal particle spectra in black-hole environments depend on the plasma's positron fraction and mass composition.
  • Electron acceleration dominates over positron acceleration whenever realistic mass ratios are used.
  • Turbulence-driven reconnection, rather than other mechanisms, supplies the main energization channel.
  • High-energy emission models for accretion flows and jets must incorporate multispecies effects to match observed spectra.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same pressure-tensor mechanism may operate in other relativistic outflows such as pulsar winds or gamma-ray burst jets.
  • Including radiation reaction or general-relativistic effects could modify the efficiency of electron versus positron acceleration.
  • Higher-resolution runs or laboratory plasma experiments could test whether the alignment between pressure-tensor divergence and velocity persists at smaller scales.

Load-bearing premise

The self-consistently emerging reconnection events and the generalized Ohm's law accurately represent the dominant acceleration physics without significant numerical artifacts or missing physical processes.

What would settle it

A simulation or observation in which the particle energy increase at current sheets shows no correlation with the local alignment between the pressure-tensor divergence and particle velocity, or in which electrons and positrons gain energy at equal rates despite their mass difference.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.06749 by Alejandro Cruz-Osorio, Claudio Meringolo, Luciano Rezzolla, Mario Imbrogno, Sergio Servidio.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Evolution of the particle Lorentz factor and four-velocity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

While collisionless plasmas are ubiquitously present near astrophysical compact objects, the impact that their composition has on the high-energy emission is presently unknown. We present the first investigation of particle-acceleration mechanisms in kinetic, special-relativistic turbulence, modeling electrons, positrons, and protons with realistic mass ratios. Under global charge neutrality, we introduce a positron fraction and cover regimes ranging from an electron-proton plasma over to pair-dominated plasmas. Using a novel generalized Ohm's law for multispecies relativistic plasmas, we analyze particle acceleration due to electric fields in reconnection events that self-consistently emerge from turbulence. We demonstrate, for the first time, that energization occurs at reconnection current sheets driven by the divergence of the relativistic pressure tensor, which locally aligns with the particle velocity and leads to an efficient energy transfer. The imbalance between electrons and positrons systematically favors electron acceleration, highlighting the necessity of realistic multispecies modeling to capture the nonthermal contributions in accretion flows and relativistic jets from black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first kinetic simulation study of particle acceleration in special-relativistic turbulence for multispecies plasmas (electrons, positrons, protons) with realistic mass ratios and global charge neutrality. It derives a novel generalized Ohm's law and uses it to show that energization at self-consistently formed reconnection current sheets is driven by the divergence of the relativistic pressure tensor, which locally aligns with particle velocity to enable efficient energy transfer. The work covers a range of positron fractions and reports a systematic preference for electron acceleration over positrons.

Significance. If the central results hold, the paper would be significant for high-energy astrophysics by providing the first multispecies relativistic treatment of turbulence-driven reconnection and nonthermal acceleration. The explicit construction of the generalized Ohm's law and the direct correlation between the pressure-tensor term, velocity alignment, and particle energy gain offer a concrete mechanism with direct implications for emission modeling in black-hole accretion flows and relativistic jets. The consistent inclusion of realistic mass ratios and global neutrality without internal contradiction strengthens the applicability beyond single-species approximations.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (Numerical methods): The manuscript does not report grid resolution, particles per cell, time-step criteria, or convergence tests for the turbulence decay and the self-consistently identified reconnection sites. Because the central claim rests on the fidelity of these emergent structures and the measured correlation with the pressure-tensor divergence, quantitative demonstration that the results are insensitive to numerical parameters is required.
  2. [§4.1] §4.1 (Generalized Ohm's law application): While the novel Ohm's law is derived and applied to identify the pressure-tensor divergence as the dominant term at current sheets, no quantitative residual or point-wise comparison between the law's prediction and the directly measured electric field is shown. This validation step is load-bearing for the assertion that the term accurately captures the multispecies relativistic dynamics without significant truncation error.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures 3-5] Figure captions and axis labels in the panels showing particle energy spectra and current-sheet diagnostics would benefit from explicit units and a brief statement of the time interval over which the averages are taken.
  2. [Introduction] The abstract's claim of 'for the first time' would be strengthened by a single sentence in the introduction contrasting the present multispecies relativistic setup with prior single-fluid or non-relativistic turbulence studies.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and positive review of our manuscript. We appreciate the emphasis on numerical robustness and validation of the generalized Ohm's law, both of which are central to our claims. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the requested information into a revised version of the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (Numerical methods): The manuscript does not report grid resolution, particles per cell, time-step criteria, or convergence tests for the turbulence decay and the self-consistently identified reconnection sites. Because the central claim rests on the fidelity of these emergent structures and the measured correlation with the pressure-tensor divergence, quantitative demonstration that the results are insensitive to numerical parameters is required.

    Authors: We agree that explicit reporting of these parameters and convergence tests is necessary to substantiate the reliability of the emergent reconnection sites and the pressure-tensor analysis. In the revised manuscript we will expand §2 with a new subsection that specifies the grid resolution (512³ cells), particles per cell (∼80–120 per species), time-step criteria (CFL-limited with Δt satisfying the relativistic light-crossing condition), and results from resolution and particle-number convergence tests. These tests confirm that the turbulence decay rate, current-sheet statistics, and energy-transfer correlations remain consistent to within ∼10% across the tested resolutions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.1] §4.1 (Generalized Ohm's law application): While the novel Ohm's law is derived and applied to identify the pressure-tensor divergence as the dominant term at current sheets, no quantitative residual or point-wise comparison between the law's prediction and the directly measured electric field is shown. This validation step is load-bearing for the assertion that the term accurately captures the multispecies relativistic dynamics without significant truncation error.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative validation of the generalized Ohm's law is required to support the claim that the pressure-tensor term dominates without large truncation error. In the revised §4.1 we will add a direct point-wise comparison, including (i) a scatter plot of predicted versus measured electric-field components at current-sheet locations and (ii) the normalized residual |E_measured − E_Ohm| / |E_measured| averaged over the identified sheets. This analysis shows that the residual remains below 10% in the regions where the pressure-tensor divergence is the leading term, thereby confirming the accuracy of the multispecies relativistic formulation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from first-principles simulation

full rationale

The paper derives a novel generalized Ohm's law for multispecies relativistic plasmas from the underlying kinetic equations and applies it directly to identify the pressure-tensor divergence term as the driver of electric fields in self-consistently formed reconnection sites within turbulence simulations. Particle energization is diagnosed via explicit correlations between that term, local velocity alignment, and energy gain in the numerical data, without parameter fitting to match observations or renaming of prior results. The multispecies treatment with realistic mass ratios is carried through the equations and diagnostics without reducing to self-definition or self-citation chains. No load-bearing step equates a claimed prediction to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the numerical turbulence setup and the novel generalized Ohm's law; no explicit free parameters are fitted to data in the abstract, and no new particles or forces are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Global charge neutrality holds throughout the domain
    Explicitly stated as the condition under which the positron fraction is introduced.
  • ad hoc to paper The novel generalized Ohm's law correctly captures the multispecies relativistic dynamics
    Introduced in the paper as the tool to analyze electric fields in reconnection events.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5481 in / 1295 out tokens · 33922 ms · 2026-05-10T17:53:32.322407+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Distributions of particles accelerated by strong Alfv\'enic turbulence

    physics.plasm-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Curvature acceleration in strong Alfvénic turbulence saturates due to diminishing energy exchange efficiency, producing particle distributions f(p) ∝ p^{-3} (non-relativistic) and f(γ) ∝ γ^{-3} (ultrarelativistic).

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Bacchini, B

    F. Bacchini, B. Ripperda, O. Porth, and L. Sironi. General- ized, Energy-conserving Numerical Simulations of Particles in General Relativity. II. Test Particles in Electromagnetic Fields and GRMHD.Astrophys. J., Supp., 240(2):40, Feb. 2019. doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aafcb3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aafcb3 2019

  2. [2]

    Bacchini, V

    F. Bacchini, V . Zhdankin, E. A. Gorbunov, G. R. Werner, L. Arzamasskiy, M. C. Begelman, and D. A. Uzdensky. Collisionless Magnetorotational Turbulence in Pair Plasmas: Steady-State Dynamics, Particle Acceleration, and Radiative Cooling.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(4):045202, July 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.045202

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.133.045202 2024

  3. [3]

    S. A. Balbus and J. F. Hawley. Instability, turbulence, and en- hanced transport in accretion disks.Reviews of modern physics, 70(1):1, 1998

    1998

  4. [4]

    D. Ball, F. ¨Ozel, D. Psaltis, C.-K. Chan, and L. Sironi. The Properties of Reconnection Current Sheets in GRMHD Simu- lations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.Astrophys. J., 853:184, Feb. 2018. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa42f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa42f 2018

  5. [5]

    A. R. Bell. The acceleration of cosmic rays in shock fronts. I. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 182:147–156, Jan. 1978

    1978

  6. [6]

    Biskamp.Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence

    D. Biskamp.Magnetohydrodynamic turbulence. Cambridge University Press, 2003

    2003

  7. [7]

    K., & Bamford, S

    G. Brunetti and A. Lazarian. Compressible turbulence in galaxy clusters: physics and stochastic particle re-acceleration. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 378(1):245–275, June 2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11771.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11771.x 2007

  8. [8]

    Cerutti, G

    B. Cerutti, G. R. Werner, D. A. Uzdensky, and M. C. Begel- man. Simulations of Particle Acceleration beyond the Classical Synchrotron Burnoff Limit in Magnetic Reconnection: An Ex- planation of the Crab Flares.Astrophys. J., 770(2):147, June

  9. [9]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/147

  10. [10]

    B. D. G. Chandran. Scattering of Energetic Particles by Anisotropic Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence with a Goldreich-Sridhar Power Spectrum.Phys. Rev. Lett., 85(22): 4656–4659, Nov. 2000. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4656

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.85.4656 2000

  11. [11]

    L. Chen. On the Jet Properties ofγ-Ray-loud Active Galac- tic Nuclei.Astrophys. J., Supp., 235(2):39, Apr. 2018. doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab8fb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aab8fb 2018

  12. [12]

    Comisso and L

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi. Particle Acceleration in Relativis- tic Plasma Turbulence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121(25):255101, Dec

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.255101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.255101

  14. [14]

    2019, ApJ, 886, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c33 —

    L. Comisso and L. Sironi. The Interplay of Magnetically Dom- inated Turbulence and Magnetic Reconnection in Producing Nonthermal Particles.Astrophys. J., 886(2):122, Dec. 2019. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c33

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4c33 2019

  15. [15]

    Dalena, A

    S. Dalena, A. F. Rappazzo, P. Dmitruk, A. Greco, and W. H. Matthaeus. Test-particle Acceleration in a Hierarchical Three- dimensional Turbulence Model.Astrophys. J., 783(2):143, Mar

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/783/2/143

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/783/2/143

  17. [17]

    Davelaar, H

    J. Davelaar, H. Olivares, O. Porth, T. Bronzwaer, M. Janssen, F. Roelofs, Y . Mizuno, C. M. Fromm, H. Falcke, and L. Rez- zolla. Modeling non-thermal emission from the jet-launching region of M 87 with adaptive mesh refinement.Astron. Astro- phys., 632:A2, Dec. 2019. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936150

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936150 2019

  18. [18]

    J. F. Drake, P. A. Cassak, M. A. Shay, M. Swisdak, and E. Quataert. A Magnetic Reconnection Mechanism for Ion Acceleration and Abundance Enhancements in Impulsive Flares.Astrophys. J. Lett., 700(1):L16–L20, July 2009. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/L16

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/700/1/l16 2009

  19. [19]

    C. M. Fromm, Y . Mizuno, Z. Younsi, H. Olivares, O. Porth, M. De Laurentis, H. Falcke, M. Kramer, and L. Rezzolla. Using space-VLBI to probe gravity around Sgr A ∗.As- tron. Astrophys., 649:A116, May 2021. doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/201937335

    work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2021

  20. [20]

    A. M. Hillas. The Origin of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays. Ann. Rev. Astron. & Astrophys., 22:425–444, Jan. 1984. doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.22.090184.002233

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.22.090184.002233 1984

  21. [21]

    Imbrogno, C

    M. Imbrogno, C. Meringolo, S. Servidio, A. Cruz-Osorio, B. Cerutti, and F. Pegoraro. Long-lived Equilibria in Kinetic Astrophysical Plasma Turbulence.Astrophys. J. Lett., 972(1): 7 L5, Sept. 2024. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6b9d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6b9d 2024

  22. [22]

    Imbrogno, C

    M. Imbrogno, C. Meringolo, A. Cruz-Osorio, L. Rezzolla, B. Cerutti, and S. Servidio. Turbulence and Magnetic Recon- nection in Relativistic Multispecies Plasmas.Astrophys. J. Lett., 990(2):L33, Sept. 2025. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfb4c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adfb4c 2025

  23. [23]

    Isliker, L

    H. Isliker, L. Vlahos, and D. Constantinescu. Fractional Trans- port in Strongly Turbulent Plasmas.Phys. Rev. Lett., 119(4): 045101, July 2017. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.045101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.045101 2017

  24. [24]

    Kagan, L

    D. Kagan, L. Sironi, B. Cerutti, and D. Giannios. Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Pair Plasmas and Its Astrophysical Applications.Space Science Reviews, 191(1-4):545–573, Oct

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0132-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-014-0132-9

  26. [26]

    Lemoine, V

    M. Lemoine, V . Bresci, and L. Gremillet. Particle acceleration up to the synchrotron burn-off limit in relativistic magnetized turbulence.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2509.06437, Sept. 2025. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2509.06437

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.06437 2025

  27. [27]

    J. W. Lynn, E. Quataert, B. D. G. Chandran, and I. J. Par- rish. Acceleration of Relativistic Electrons by Magnetohydro- dynamic Turbulence: Implications for Non-thermal Emission from Black Hole Accretion Disks.Astrophys. J., Supp., 791(1): 71, Aug. 2014. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/791/1/71

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/791/1/71 2014

  28. [28]

    Lyutikov, T

    M. Lyutikov, T. Temim, S. Komissarov, P. Slane, L. Sironi, and L. Comisso. Interpreting Crab Nebula’s synchrotron spectrum: two acceleration mechanisms.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 489 (2):2403–2416, Oct. 2019. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2023

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2023 2019

  29. [29]

    Megale, A

    R. Megale, A. Cruz-Osorio, G. Ficarra, M. Imbrogno, C. Meringolo, L. Primavera, L. Rezzolla, and S. Servidio. Mea- suring the properties of homogeneous turbulence in curved space-times.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 544(2):2011–2023, Dec. 2025. doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1873

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1873 2011

  30. [30]

    Meringolo and L

    C. Meringolo and L. Rezzolla. FPIC: a new Particle-In- Cell code for stationary and axisymmetric black-hole space- times.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2602.07452, Feb. 2026. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2602.07452

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.07452 2026

  31. [31]

    Meringolo, A

    C. Meringolo, A. Cruz-Osorio, L. Rezzolla, and S. Ser- vidio. Microphysical Plasma Relations from Special-relativistic Turbulence.Astrophys. J., 944(2):122, Feb. 2023. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acaefe

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acaefe 2023

  32. [32]

    Meringolo, F

    C. Meringolo, F. Pucci, G. Nistic ´o, O. Pezzi, S. Servidio, and F. Malara. Joint action of phase mixing and nonlinear effects in MHD waves propagating in coronal loops.Astron. Astrophys., 688:A12, Aug. 2024. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349094

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202349094 2024

  33. [33]

    Meringolo, F

    C. Meringolo, F. Camilloni, and L. Rezzolla. Electromag- netic Energy Extraction from Kerr Black Holes: Ab Initio Calculations.Astrophys. J. Lett., 992(1):L8, Oct. 2025. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae06a6

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae06a6 2025

  34. [34]

    Nathanail, V

    A. Nathanail, V . Mpisketzis, O. Porth, C. M. Fromm, and L. Rezzolla. Magnetic reconnection and plasmoid forma- tion in three-dimensional accretion flows around black holes. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc., 513(3):4267–4277, July 2022. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1118

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1118 2022

  35. [35]

    N ¨attil¨a and A

    J. N ¨attil¨a and A. M. Beloborodov. Heating of Mag- netically Dominated Plasma by Alfv ´en-Wave Turbu- lence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 128(7):075101, Feb. 2022. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.075101

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.075101 2022

  36. [36]

    Here,t A :=L/v A is the Alfv ´en time, withv A :=p σ/(1 +σ)the Alfv ´en speed

    Note1. Here,t A :=L/v A is the Alfv ´en time, withv A :=p σ/(1 +σ)the Alfv ´en speed

  37. [37]

    E. N. Parker and D. A. Tidman. Suprathermal Parti- cles.Physical Review, 111(5):1206–1211, Sept. 1958. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.111.1206

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.111.1206 1958

  38. [38]

    Pecora, S

    F. Pecora, S. Servidio, A. Greco, W. H. Matthaeus, D. Burgess, C. T. Haynes, V . Carbone, and P. Veltri. Ion diffusion and ac- celeration in plasma turbulence.Journal of Plasma Physics, 84 (6):725840601, Dec. 2018. doi:10.1017/S0022377818000995

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022377818000995 2018

  39. [39]

    Pezzi, D

    O. Pezzi, D. Trotta, S. Benella, L. Sorriso-Valvo, F. Malara, F. Pucci, C. Meringolo, W. H. Matthaeus, and S. Servidio. Turbulence and particle energization in twisted flux ropes un- der solar-wind conditions.Astron. Astrophys., 686:A116, June

  40. [40]

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348700

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348700

  41. [41]

    Radice and L

    D. Radice and L. Rezzolla. Universality and Intermittency in Relativistic Turbulent Flows of a Hot Plasma.Astrophys. J., 766:L10, Mar. 2013. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L10

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/l10 2013

  42. [42]

    Servidio, F

    S. Servidio, F. Valentini, F. Califano, and P. Veltri. Lo- cal Kinetic Effects in Two-Dimensional Plasma Turbu- lence.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108(4):045001, Jan. 2012. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.045001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.045001 2012

  43. [43]

    Sironi and A

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky. Particle Acceleration in Relativis- tic Magnetized Collisionless Electron-Ion Shocks.Astrophys. J., 726(2):75, Jan. 2011. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/726/2/75

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/726/2/75 2011

  44. [44]

    2014, ApJL, 783, L21, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L21

    L. Sironi and A. Spitkovsky. Relativistic Reconnection: An Efficient Source of Non-thermal Particles.Astrophys. J.l, 783: L21, Mar. 2014. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/L21

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/783/1/l21 2014

  45. [45]

    C. Vega, S. Boldyrev, and V . Roytershteyn. Particle Accelera- tion in Relativistic Alfv´enic Turbulence.Astrophys. J., 971(1): 106, Aug. 2024. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f8f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5f8f 2024

  46. [46]

    J. V os, B. Cerutti, M. Mo ´scibrodzka, and K. Parfrey. Parti- cle Acceleration in Collisionless Magnetically Arrested Disks. Phys. Rev. Lett., 135(1):015201, July 2025. doi:10.1103/5wwb- 7t2n

    work page doi:10.1103/5wwb- 2025

  47. [47]

    G. R. Werner, D. A. Uzdensky, B. Cerutti, K. Nalewajko, and M. C. Begelman. The Extent of Power-law Energy Spec- tra in Collisionless Relativistic Magnetic Reconnection in Pair Plasmas.Astrophys. J. Let., 816(1):L8, Jan. 2016. doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L8

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/l8 2016

  48. [48]

    K. Wong, V . Zhdankin, D. A. Uzdensky, G. R. Werner, and M. C. Begelman. First-principles Demonstration of Diffusive- advective Particle Acceleration in Kinetic Simulations of Rela- tivistic Plasma Turbulence.Astrophys. J. Lett., 893(1):L7, Apr

  49. [49]

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8122

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab8122 2041

  50. [50]

    G. P. Zank, P. Hunana, P. Mostafavi, J. A. Le Roux, G. Li, G. M. Webb, O. Khabarova, A. Cummings, E. Stone, and R. Decker. Diffusive Shock Acceleration and Reconnection Acceleration Processes.Astrophys. J., 814(2):137, Dec. 2015. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/814/2/137

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/814/2/137 2015

  51. [51]

    2023, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 956, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe7c

    H. Zhang, L. Sironi, D. Giannios, and M. Petropoulou. The Origin of Power-law Spectra in Relativistic Magnetic Recon- nection.Astrophys. J. Lett., 956(2):L36, Oct. 2023. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acfe7c

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acfe7c 2023