arxiv: 2604.06835 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🧬 q-bio.PE · q-bio.GN

Recognition: unknown

WebCVTree4: A Newly Designed Phylogenetic and Taxonomic Study Platform for Prokaryotes Using Composition Vectors and Whole Genomes

Guanghong Zuo

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.PE q-bio.GN

keywords phylogeneticsprokaryoteswhole genome sequencingcomposition vectorstaxonomic comparisonweb platformevolutionary trees

0 comments

The pith

The WebCVTree4 platform allows online reconstruction of phylogenetic trees for tens of thousands of prokaryotes using whole-genome composition vectors, along with new methods to root trees and compare them to taxonomic classifications.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper presents an upgraded web service called WebCVTree4 for building evolutionary trees of prokaryotes directly from their complete DNA sequences. The service uses an alignment-free approach based on composition vectors to handle very large numbers of species efficiently. A new algorithm has been added that can quickly root the trees, assign taxonomic labels, and check how well the tree matches official classification systems. Users interact with the results through a web interface that lets them adjust views and download publication-ready images. As more microbial genomes become available, this kind of tool supports efforts to understand microbial evolution and update taxonomy based on full genetic data rather than limited markers.

Core claim

WebCVTree4 upgrades the CVTree methodology by updating its genomic database and optimizing the core algorithm to support phylogenetic reconstruction for tens of thousands of species online. It introduces a novel algorithm for rapid tree rooting, taxonomic annotation, and topology comparison with established taxonomic systems, all accessible via an interactive web-based visualization tool for dynamic tree layout adjustments and high-quality figure exports.

What carries the argument

The WebCVTree4 platform, which builds on the composition vector (CV) method for alignment-free phylogeny and adds a new comparison algorithm for tree-taxonomy matching.

If this is right

Phylogenetic trees for large sets of prokaryotes can be built and analyzed directly on the web without local computation resources.
The new algorithm enables quick integration of tree results with standard taxonomic hierarchies.
Users gain tools to visually compare genome-based phylogenies against traditional taxonomy and export figures for reports.
Research on microbial evolution will increasingly use whole-genome data through accessible online platforms like this.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Such platforms could accelerate the discovery of new prokaryotic lineages by allowing researchers to test tree placements against existing classifications at scale.
If the comparison algorithm proves reliable, it might help identify inconsistencies in current taxonomic systems that genome data reveals.
Future extensions could include automated suggestions for taxonomic revisions based on the topology comparisons.

Load-bearing premise

The optimizations and novel comparison algorithm produce accurate and reliable phylogenetic results for large prokaryotic datasets even without reported validation tests.

What would settle it

Running the platform on a well-studied set of prokaryotic genomes whose relationships are known from independent methods and checking whether the output trees and annotations match those established relationships.

read the original abstract

CVTree is an alignment-free methodology for inferring species phylogeny and taxonomy. This method allows for the efficient and accurate resolution of evolutionary relationships among large numbers of species based on whole-genome sequence data. Since 2004, we have been continuously providing CVTree web services. Recently, the server has undergone a significant upgrade, culminating in the release of the WebCVTree4 platform. This upgrade encompasses a comprehensive update of the inbuilt genomic database. Concurrently, the core algorithm has been optimized to support online phylogenetic reconstruction for tens of thousands of species, thereby facilitating the construction of genome-based trees of life. Moreover, we have developed a novel algorithm for comparing phylogenetic trees with established taxonomic systems. This algorithm allows for rapid tree rooting, taxonomic annotation, and topology comparison. Through an interactive web-based visualization tool, users can dynamically adjust tree layouts and export high-quality phylogenetic tree figures. This functionality provides robust support for comparative analysis between CVTree-generated phylogeny and taxonomy. As genome sequencing costs continue to decline, research into microbial evolution and the revision of taxonomic frameworks will increasingly rely on whole-genome data. WebCVTree4 will serve as an efficient web-based platform to support studies in microbial phylogenetics and taxonomy, accessible at https://cvtree.online/.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper is an unvalidated description of an upgraded web platform for prokaryotic phylogenetics.

read the letter

The key point about this paper is that it describes an upgrade to the CVTree web service but offers no benchmarks or validation to support its claims about handling large datasets or the performance of the new tree comparison algorithm. The authors have expanded the built-in genomic database and optimized the core composition vector algorithm. This is meant to enable online phylogenetic reconstruction for tens of thousands of prokaryotic species. They also introduce a new algorithm for rapid tree rooting, taxonomic annotation, and comparing tree topologies to established systems. An interactive visualization tool lets users adjust layouts and export figures. The site is at cvtree.online. This continues a line of work that started in 2004, providing an alignment-free way to infer prokaryote relationships from whole genomes. For fields where genome data is exploding, having an accessible online platform can be convenient for quick comparisons. The main weakness is the lack of evidence. The paper states the optimizations and new features but includes no runtime measurements, memory requirements, accuracy metrics against reference taxonomies, or tests on large datasets. Without these, it's impossible to know if the platform actually scales or if the comparison algorithm produces reliable results. This kind of paper is aimed at microbiologists and taxonomists who work with prokaryotic genomes and might benefit from an updated tool for building and comparing trees. A reader interested in practical software for microbial phylogenetics could find value in trying the live version. I do not think it deserves peer review as it stands. The absence of any empirical support for the central claims makes it difficult to evaluate the contribution. The authors would need to add validation data and performance tests to make a stronger case.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents WebCVTree4, an upgraded web-based platform for phylogenetic and taxonomic studies of prokaryotes using the composition vector (CVTree) method on whole-genome sequences. It describes updates to the genomic database, optimizations to the core algorithm enabling online reconstruction for tens of thousands of species, a novel algorithm for tree comparison including rapid rooting, taxonomic annotation, and topology comparison with taxonomic systems, and an interactive visualization tool for dynamic tree adjustment and figure export.

Significance. If the described optimizations and novel algorithm are validated to perform reliably at scale, the platform would offer significant utility as an accessible online tool for large-scale microbial phylogenetics and taxonomy, facilitating comparative analyses between genome-based trees and established classifications as sequencing costs decline. The work builds on the long-standing CVTree service since 2004 and provides a practical resource for the field.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the core algorithm has been optimized to support online phylogenetic reconstruction for tens of thousands of species is presented without any runtime measurements, memory usage figures, scalability benchmarks, or tests on large prokaryotic datasets, leaving the central performance assertion unsubstantiated.
[Abstract] Abstract: The novel algorithm for rapid tree rooting, taxonomic annotation, and topology comparison is introduced without methodological details, implementation description, or validation metrics against reference systems such as NCBI Taxonomy or GTDB, which is load-bearing for claims of reliability and utility in comparative analysis.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract refers to 'high-quality phylogenetic tree figures' and 'dynamic adjustment' in the visualization tool but does not specify supported export formats, resolution options, or layout algorithms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript describing the WebCVTree4 platform. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional supporting evidence and details.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that the core algorithm has been optimized to support online phylogenetic reconstruction for tens of thousands of species is presented without any runtime measurements, memory usage figures, scalability benchmarks, or tests on large prokaryotic datasets, leaving the central performance assertion unsubstantiated.

Authors: We agree that explicit performance data would strengthen the abstract and the central claim. The full manuscript describes the algorithmic optimizations (including parallelization and data structure improvements) that enable handling of large datasets, but we acknowledge the absence of quantitative benchmarks in the current version. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection with runtime measurements, peak memory usage, and scalability tests on prokaryotic datasets of increasing size up to tens of thousands of genomes, including comparisons with previous CVTree versions. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The novel algorithm for rapid tree rooting, taxonomic annotation, and topology comparison is introduced without methodological details, implementation description, or validation metrics against reference systems such as NCBI Taxonomy or GTDB, which is load-bearing for claims of reliability and utility in comparative analysis.

Authors: The manuscript contains a Methods section describing the tree comparison algorithm, including the rapid rooting procedure, taxonomic annotation logic, and topology comparison metrics. However, we recognize that the abstract and main text would benefit from expanded details and empirical validation. In the revision, we will elaborate the implementation description, provide pseudocode or key equations where appropriate, and include validation results (e.g., agreement percentages and runtime) against NCBI Taxonomy and GTDB on benchmark datasets. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; platform description with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a software platform description for WebCVTree4, an upgrade to the existing CVTree web service. It reports database updates, algorithm optimizations for handling tens of thousands of genomes, and a new tree-comparison algorithm, but contains no mathematical derivations, equations, parameter fitting, or claims that reduce by construction to prior inputs. The central claims are functional descriptions of features rather than predictive results derived from self-referential steps. No load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked to force the reported outcomes. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained as an engineering report rather than a circular theoretical argument.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper is a description of a software platform update and introduces no new mathematical models, free parameters, axioms, or postulated entities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 989 out tokens · 30748 ms · 2026-05-10T17:28:55.870938+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references

[1]

Big data: Astronomical or genomical? PLOS Biology 2015;13:e1002195

Stephens ZD, Lee SY, Faghri F, Campbell RH, Zhai C, Efron MJ, et al. Big data: Astronomical or genomical? PLOS Biology 2015;13:e1002195

2015
[2]

Twenty years of bacterial genome sequencing

Loman NJ, Pallen MJ. Twenty years of bacterial genome sequencing. Nat Rev Microbiol 2015;13:787–94

2015
[3]

DNA sequencing at 40: Past, present and future

Shendure J, Balasubramanian S, Church GM, Gilbert W, Rogers J, Schloss JA, et al. DNA sequencing at 40: Past, present and future. Nature 2017;550:345–53

2017
[4]

A brief history of bioinformatics

Gauthier J, Vincent AT, Charette SJ, Derome N. A brief history of bioinformatics. Brief Bioinform 2019;20:1981–96

2019
[5]

Scalability and validation of big data bioinformatics software

Yang A, Troup M, Ho JWK. Scalability and validation of big data bioinformatics software. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2017;15:379–86

2017
[6]

Inferring phylogenies

Felsenstein J. Inferring phylogenies. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer Associates is an imprint of Oxford University Press; 2004

2004
[7]

Molecular evolution and phylogenetics

Nei M, Kumar S. Molecular evolution and phylogenetics. Cary: Oxford University Press; 2000

2000
[8]

Phylogenomics and the evolution of hemipteroid insects

Johnson KP, Dietrich CH, Friedrich F, Beutel RG, Wipfler B, Peters RS, et al. Phylogenomics and the evolution of hemipteroid insects. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2018;115:12775–80

2018
[9]

Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity

Zaremba-Niedzwiedzka K, Caceres EF, Saw JH, Bäckström D, Juzokaite L, Vancaester E, et al. Asgard archaea illuminate the origin of eukaryotic cellular complexity. Nature 2017;541:353–8

2017
[10]

Phylogenomic analyses indicate the archaeal superphylum DPANN originated from free-living euryarchaeal-like ancestors

Baker BA, McCarthy CGP, López-García P, Leroy RB, Susko E, Roger AJ, et al. Phylogenomic analyses indicate the archaeal superphylum DPANN originated from free-living euryarchaeal-like ancestors. Nat Microbiol 2025:1–12

2025
[11]

Inference and reconstruction of the heimdallarchaeial ancestry of eukaryotes

Eme L, Tamarit D, Caceres EF, Stairs CW, De Anda V, Schön ME, et al. Inference and reconstruction of the heimdallarchaeial ancestry of eukaryotes. Nature 2023;618:992–9

2023
[12]

Virus taxonomy in the age of metagenomics

Simmonds P, Adams MJ, Benkő M, Breitbart M, Brister JR, Carstens EB, et al. Virus taxonomy in the age of metagenomics. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017;15:161–8

2017
[13]

Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes

Eme L, Spang A, Lombard J, Stairs CW, Ettema TJG. Archaea and the origin of eukaryotes. Nat Rev Microbiol 2017;15:711–23

2017
[14]

Classification of methanogenic bacteria by 16S ribosomal RNA characterization

Fox GE, Woese CR. Classification of methanogenic bacteria by 16S ribosomal RNA characterization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1977;74:4537–41

1977
[15]

Molecular evolution: A statistical approach

Yang Z. Molecular evolution: A statistical approach. Oxford (GB): Oxford University Press; 2014

2014
[16]

MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput

Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:1792–7

2004
[17]

RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies

Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 2014;30:1312–3

2014
[18]

Alignment-free genetic sequence comparisons: a review of recent approaches by word analysis

Bonham-Carter O, Steele J, Bastola D. Alignment-free genetic sequence comparisons: a review of recent approaches by word analysis. Briefings Bioinf 2014;15:890–905

2014
[19]

Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools

Zielezinski A, Vinga S, Almeida J, Karlowski WM. Alignment-free sequence comparison: benefits, applications, and tools. Genome Biol 2017;18:186

2017
[20]

Alignment-free sequence analysis and applications

Ren J, Bai X, Lu YY, Tang KJ, Wang Y, Reinert G, et al. Alignment-free sequence analysis and applications. Annu Rev Biomed Data Sci Vol 1 2018;1:93–114

2018
[21]

Benchmarking of alignment-free sequence comparison methods

Zielezinski A, Girgis HZ, Bernard G, Leimeister CA, Tang KJ, Dencker T, et al. Benchmarking of alignment-free sequence comparison methods. Genome Biol 2019;20

2019
[22]

Information theory applications for biological sequence analysis

Vinga S. Information theory applications for biological sequence analysis. Briefings Bioinf 2014;15:376–89

2014
[23]

Alignment-free sequence comparison - a review

Vinga S, Almeida J. Alignment-free sequence comparison - a review. Bioinformatics 2003;19:513–23

2003
[24]

Whole proteome prokaryote phylogeny without sequence alignment: a K-string composition approach

Qi J, Wang B, Hao B. Whole proteome prokaryote phylogeny without sequence alignment: a K-string composition approach. J Mol Evol 2004;58:1–11

2004
[25]

CVTree: a parallel alignment-free phylogeny and taxonomy tool based on composition vectors of genomes

Zuo G. CVTree: a parallel alignment-free phylogeny and taxonomy tool based on composition vectors of genomes. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2021;19:662–7

2021
[26]

Shigella strains are not clones of escherichia coli but sister species in the genus escherichia

Zuo G, Xu Z, Hao B. Shigella strains are not clones of escherichia coli but sister species in the genus escherichia. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2013;11:61–5

2013
[27]

Phylogeny and taxonomy of archaea: a comparison of the whole-genome-based CVTree approach with 16S rRNA sequence analysis

Zuo G, Xu Z, Hao B. Phylogeny and taxonomy of archaea: a comparison of the whole-genome-based CVTree approach with 16S rRNA sequence analysis. Life (Basel) 2015;5:949–68

2015
[28]

sulfolobus islandicus

Zuo G, Hao B, Staley JT. Geographic divergence of “sulfolobus islandicus” strains assessed by genomic analyses including electronic DNA hybridization confirms they are geovars. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2014;105:431–5

2014
[29]

Accelerated dysbiosis of gut microbiota during aggravation of DSS-induced colitis by a butyrate-producing bacterium

Zhang Q, Wu Y, Wang J, Wu G, Long W, Xue Z, et al. Accelerated dysbiosis of gut microbiota during aggravation of DSS-induced colitis by a butyrate-producing bacterium. Sci Rep 2016;6:27572

2016
[30]

Composition-based classification of short metagenomic sequences elucidates the landscapes of taxonomic and functional enrichment of microorganisms

Liu J, Wang H, Yang H, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhao F, et al. Composition-based classification of short metagenomic sequences elucidates the landscapes of taxonomic and functional enrichment of microorganisms. Nucleic Acids Res 2013;41:e3

2013
[31]

Whole genome molecular phylogeny of large dsDNA viruses using composition vector method

Gao L, Qi J. Whole genome molecular phylogeny of large dsDNA viruses using composition vector method. BMC Evol Biol 2007;7:41

2007
[32]

A fungal phylogeny based on 82 complete genomes using the composition vector method

Wang H, Xu Z, Gao L, Hao B. A fungal phylogeny based on 82 complete genomes using the composition vector method. BMC Evol Biol 2009;9:195

2009
[33]

Linking secondary metabolites to gene clusters through genome sequencing of six diverse aspergillus species

Kjaerbolling I, Vesth TC, Frisvad JC, Nybo JL, Theobald S, Kuo A, et al. Linking secondary metabolites to gene clusters through genome sequencing of six diverse aspergillus species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2018;115:E753–61

2018
[34]

Origin and phylogeny of chloroplasts revealed by a simple correlation analysis of complete genomes

Chu KH, Qi J, Yu ZG, Anh V. Origin and phylogeny of chloroplasts revealed by a simple correlation analysis of complete genomes. Mol Biol Evol 2004;21:200–6

2004
[35]

Phylogenetic and biological significance of evolutionary elements from metazoan mitochondrial genomes

Yuan J, Zhu Q, Liu B. Phylogenetic and biological significance of evolutionary elements from metazoan mitochondrial genomes. PLOS One 2014;9:e84330

2014
[36]

Polyphyly in 16S rRNA-based LVTree versus monophyly in whole-genome-based CVTree

Zuo G, Qi J, Hao B. Polyphyly in 16S rRNA-based LVTree versus monophyly in whole-genome-based CVTree. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2018;16:310–9

2018
[37]

On monospecific genera in prokaryotic taxonomy

Zuo G, Hao B. On monospecific genera in prokaryotic taxonomy. Synth Syst Biotechnol 2017;2:226–35

2017
[38]

CVTree for 16S rRNA: Constructing taxonomy-compatible all-species living tree effectively and efficiently

Lu Y-F, Zhi X-Y, Zuo G-H. CVTree for 16S rRNA: Constructing taxonomy-compatible all-species living tree effectively and efficiently. Chinese Phys B 2025;34:088704

2025
[39]

CVTree: a phylogenetic tree reconstruction tool based on whole genomes

Qi J, Luo H, Hao B. CVTree: a phylogenetic tree reconstruction tool based on whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2004;32:W45-7

2004
[40]

CVTree update: A newly designed phylogenetic study platform using composition vectors and whole genomes

Xu Z, Hao B. CVTree update: A newly designed phylogenetic study platform using composition vectors and whole genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 2009;37:W174-8

2009
[41]

CVTree3 web server for whole-genome-based and alignment-free prokaryotic phylogeny and taxonomy

Zuo G, Hao B. CVTree3 web server for whole-genome-based and alignment-free prokaryotic phylogeny and taxonomy. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2015;13:321–31

2015
[42]

Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation

O’Leary NA, Wright MW, Brister JR, Ciufo S, Haddad D, McVeigh R, et al. Reference sequence (RefSeq) database at NCBI: current status, taxonomic expansion, and functional annotation. Nucleic Acids Res 2016;44:D733–45

2016
[43]

CLTree: a tool for annotating, rooting, and evaluating phylogenetic trees leveraging genomic lineages 2025

Zuo G. CLTree: a tool for annotating, rooting, and evaluating phylogenetic trees leveraging genomic lineages 2025

2025
[44]

The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.7: Content updates and new features

Chen I-MA, Chu K, Palaniappan K, Ratner A, Huang J, Huntemann M, et al. The IMG/M data management and analysis system v.7: Content updates and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 2023;51:D723–32

2023
[45]

PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource

Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, Disz TL, Driscoll T, Gabbard JL, et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D581–91

2014
[46]

Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center

Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, Boisvert S, Brettin T, Bun C, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res 2017;45:D535–42

2017
[47]

The NCBI taxonomy database

Federhen S. The NCBI taxonomy database. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D136–43

2012
[48]

Taxallnomy: an extension of NCBI taxonomy that produces a hierarchically complete taxonomic tree

Sakamoto T, Ortega JM. Taxallnomy: an extension of NCBI taxonomy that produces a hierarchically complete taxonomic tree. BMC Bioinf 2021;22:388

2021
[49]

List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ

Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020;70:5607–12

2020
[50]

LPSN—list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature

Parte AC. LPSN—list of prokaryotic names with standing in nomenclature. Nucleic Acids Res 2014;42:D613–6

2014
[51]

Jackknife and bootstrap tests of the composition vector trees

Zuo G, Xu Z, Yu H, Hao B. Jackknife and bootstrap tests of the composition vector trees. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2010;8:262–7

2010
[52]

On K-peptide length in composition vector phylogeny of prokaryotes

Zuo G, Li Q, Hao B. On K-peptide length in composition vector phylogeny of prokaryotes. Comput Biol Chem 2014;53 Pt A:166–73

2014
[53]

Phylogenomic Testing of Root Hypotheses

Tria FDK, Landan G, Picazo DR, Dagan T. Phylogenomic Testing of Root Hypotheses. Genome Biology and Evolution 2023;15:evad096

2023
[54]

Evaluation of some coefficients for use in numerical taxonomy of microorganisms

Austin B, Colwell RR. Evaluation of some coefficients for use in numerical taxonomy of microorganisms. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1977;27:204–10

1977
[55]

Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the bacteria and archaea

Chun J, Rainey FA. Integrating genomics into the taxonomy and systematics of the bacteria and archaea. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014;64:316–24

2014
[56]

Prokaryotic taxonomy and nomenclature in the age of big sequence data

Hugenholtz P, Chuvochina M, Oren A, Parks DH, Soo RM. Prokaryotic taxonomy and nomenclature in the age of big sequence data. ISME J 2021;15:1879–92

2021
[57]

Reconciling taxonomy and phylogenetic inference: formalism and algorithms for describing discord and inferring taxonomic roots

Matsen FA, Gallagher A. Reconciling taxonomy and phylogenetic inference: formalism and algorithms for describing discord and inferring taxonomic roots. Algorithms Mol Biol 2012;7:8

2012
[58]

Physiology and evolution of spirochetes

Canale-Parola E. Physiology and evolution of spirochetes. Bacteriol Rev 1977;41:181–204

1977
[59]

Introduction to the spirochetes

Johnson RC. Introduction to the spirochetes. In: Starr MP, Stolp H, Trüper HG, Balows A, Schlegel HG, editors. The prokaryotes: a handbook on habitats, isolation, and identification of bacteria, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 1981, p. 533–7

1981
[60]

Complete genome sequence of the termite hindgut bacterium spirochaeta coccoides type strain (SPN1T), reclassification in the genus sphaerochaeta as sphaerochaeta coccoides comb

Abt B, Han C, Scheuner C, Lu M, Lapidus A, Nolan M, et al. Complete genome sequence of the termite hindgut bacterium spirochaeta coccoides type strain (SPN1T), reclassification in the genus sphaerochaeta as sphaerochaeta coccoides comb. nov. and emendations of the family spirochaetaceae and the genus sphaerochaeta. Stand Genomic Sci 2012;6:194–209

2012
[61]

Validation list no

Oren A, Göker M. Validation list no. 215. Valid publication of new names and new combinations effectively published outside the IJSEM. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2024;74:6173

2024
[62]

Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the genome taxonomy database under two prokaryotic codes

Chuvochina M, Mussig AJ, Chaumeil P-A, Skarshewski A, Rinke C, Parks DH, et al. Proposal of names for 329 higher rank taxa defined in the genome taxonomy database under two prokaryotic codes. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2023;370:fnad071

2023
[63]

原核生物系统发生学与分类学的一致性: 组份矢量树与原核生物分类系统的详尽比较

高雷, 戚继, 孙健冬, 郝柏林. 原核生物系统发生学与分类学的一致性: 组份矢量树与原核生物分类系统的详尽比较. 中国科学 c 辑 2007;37:389–401. Figure Legends Figure 1 Workflow of the Backend of WebCVTree4. The backend system of WebCVTree4 comprises three core modules: a built-in module for whole-genome data and taxonomic information; a whole-genome-based module for generating the CVTree phylogenetic tree; and a ...

2007