pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07588 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: unknown

Isolating Sgr A East: The First Uncontaminated X-ray Maps of a Galactic Center Supernova Remnant

Mayura Balakrishnan , Adrien Picquenot , Lia Corales , Q. Daniel Wang , Fabio Acero , Rodolfo Montez Jr
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords Sgr A Eastsupernova remnantX-ray mapsGalactic Centercomponent separationionization agemixed-morphology SNRChandra observations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Isolating Sgr A East supernova remnant yields lower ionization age and higher density than prior estimates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies Poissonian Generalized Morphological Component Analysis to stacked Chandra ACIS-I observations to separate the X-ray emission of the Sgr A East supernova remnant from the overlapping stellar wind plasma near Sagittarius A*. This separation produces the first clean spatial maps of the remnant, including centrally concentrated iron emission and the location of its reflected shock, along with revised spectral parameters. A sympathetic reader would care because accurate remnant properties clarify how supernovae couple to the dense nuclear environment and affect high-energy feedback in galactic centers. The work shows that prior measurements were biased by line-of-sight confusion.

Core claim

By decomposing the blended X-ray data with pGMCA, the authors isolate uncontaminated emission from Sgr A East and recover spectral models showing a lower ionization age and higher electron density than previously reported, consistent with strong interaction between the remnant and dense surrounding material.

What carries the argument

Poissonian Generalized Morphological Component Analysis (pGMCA), which decomposes the observed X-ray counts into distinct spatial-spectral components for the supernova remnant and the surrounding plasma.

If this is right

  • The revised parameters imply the remnant has interacted more strongly with dense gas, altering estimates of its age, energy budget, and expansion into the Galactic Center environment.
  • Spatially resolved maps of Fe, S, Ar, and Ca emission can now be used to study metal mixing in mixed-morphology remnants without confusion bias.
  • The location of the reflected shock provides a direct anchor for modeling the remnant's dynamical history.
  • Demonstrates a general method for extracting intrinsic properties from confused X-ray fields near galactic nuclei.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same separation technique could be tested on other line-of-sight confused regions such as the Galactic ridge or nearby starburst nuclei to extract clean supernova remnant spectra.
  • Higher electron density and lower ionization age together suggest the remnant is currently sweeping up material at a rate that could be checked against future infrared or radio observations of the surrounding molecular clouds.
  • If confirmed, the revised parameters would tighten constraints on the supernova rate and energy injection needed to sustain the observed hot plasma in the central few parsecs.

Load-bearing premise

That the pGMCA decomposition cleanly separates the supernova remnant emission from the stellar wind plasma without residual contamination or artifacts that would alter the measured ionization age and density.

What would settle it

New observations or independent separation methods that produce ionization ages and densities for Sgr A East matching the older contaminated values, or multiwavelength data showing no dense material interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07588 by Adrien Picquenot, Fabio Acero, Lia Corales, Mayura Balakrishnan, Q. Daniel Wang, Rodolfo Montez Jr.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: View of the region of interest in several different wavelength bands. In all panels, north is up and east is to the left, and an “X” denotes the location of Sgr A*. At the distance of Sgr A*, 1 pc is approximately 25”. a) SCUBA 450µm continuum image, showing the distribution and density of the molecular gas; b) - d) Herschel HI-Gal dust temperature maps, reflecting the column density of material at a given… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Resulting flux maps (in units of erg/cm2 /s) of the stacked 1.3 Ms Chandra ACIS-I observations, listed in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Energy hue map of the region spanning 2−8 keV. The color of each pixel is dictated by its median energy (shown in the colorbar), while the lightness and saturation (described in the grayscale bar) are determined by the X-ray intensity in that pixel. Brighter and more saturated regions therefore have a higher X-ray intensity. We identify spec￾trally differentiated features of interest in this work. Note tha… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Energy hue maps generated only with photons between 5−8 keV. Here, the distinction between the SNR iron core and the plasma surrounding Sgr A* is highlighted. The plasma associated with Sgr A* seems to correspond to median energies ∼6-6.2 keV while the SNR iron core has median pixel energies closer to 6.7 keV. smoothed/denoised. Both algorithms proved their abil￾ity to extract detailed and unpolluted maps … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: GMCA outputs and corresponding spectra. The output images have been divided by exposure maps created with flux obs. All images share the same log-spaced colorbar, with yellow indicating the lowest emission levels and blue corresponding to regions of high emission. The top row shows the two main components seen between 5−8 keV, while the top two rows display the four components identified by the algorithm i… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: GMCA outputs we believe capture emission from the supernova remnant. Each image has the radio shell (Zhao et al. 2016) overlaid in white, an X at the location of Sgr A*, and a scale bar showing the extent of 2 parsecs in the bottom left. Below each image, we plot the associated spectrum. The panel on the left is from the 5−8 keV component, while the other two are emission components from the 2−5 keV data. … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Median energy map of 2−8 keV photons (identical to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: LEFT: NH2 column densities of gas associated with dust at 25.7 K (derived from HI-Gal plane survey dust maps Marsh et al. 2017), with VLA 5.5 GHz contours and 2−5 keV pGMCA Component 3 contours in white and cyan, respectively. RIGHT: pGMCA 2−5 keV component 3, from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: LEFT: 2–8 keV energy hue map, with the contours from the right panel shown in cyan. RIGHT: SCUBA 450 µm emission (colormap) with overlaid contours. Arrows mark gaps in the molecular material, and the red regions in the energy map correspond precisely to these holes. This alignment indicates that the SNR lies behind the molecular gas where the median pixel energy is higher, since the softer X-ray emission h… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: GMCA outputs that appear co-spatial with warm and hot gas emission. Each image has cnotours from 37.1µm ∼ SOFIA FORCAST dust emission (Tdust ∼ 100K) and 1.875 µm Pa-α HST NICMOS ∼ (Tgas ∼ 100K) emission in pink and white, respectively. They also have an X at the location of Sgr A* and a scale bar showing the extent of 2 parsecs in the bottom left. The panel on the left is emission between 2−5 keV while th… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: GMCA 2−5 keV Component 2. On the left, the image is overlaid with contours from the SCUBA 450 µm continuum (Pierce-Price et al. 2000). The colorbar is consistent with the other pGMCA outputs, an “X” marks the location of Sgr A*, and a 2 pc scale bar is shown on the bottom right. On the right, the spectrum is dominated by a strong feature at ∼2.4 keV. This component exhibits the broadest spectral features … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Fractional contributions of the four pGMCA components to the 2–5 keV emission. Top left: Sum of all pGMCA components. Top middle/right; bottom left/middle: Fractional maps for Components 1–4, respectively; cyan contours trace intensity structure. Bottom right: Blended representation in which hue encodes component identity (green: supernova remnant; blue: GCXE; red: NSC/wind-fed plasma) and saturation refl… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Spatially distinct spectral extraction regions de￾rived from the pGMCA fractional maps, demonstrating re￾gions where each component dominates. Contours mark the core zones of each pGMCA component (see text). Yellow: Fe-rich Sgr A East core (SNR-dominated). Magenta: hot, wind-shocked plasma associated with Sgr A** (NSC/dust component), including a particularly bright western feature that may trace the inte… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Merged Chandra event image created using reproject obs, with point sources identified by wavdetect shown as green ellipses. These regions were manually refined to exclude diffuse structures misidentified as compact sources. The black diamond near the center marks the location of the supermassive black hole, Sgr A*. The image is centered on Sgr A* and spans 8.4’ x 8.4’. Marsh, K. A., Whitworth, A. P., Loma… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The central few parsecs of the Milky Way host a complex X-ray-emitting environment in which several extended plasma components are blended along the line of sight, complicating attempts to measure the intrinsic properties of individual components. In particular, the supernova remnant (SNR) Sgr A East is strongly confused with the stellar wind-fed plasma associated with Sagittarius A* and the surrounding nuclear environment. Here we apply Poissonian Generalized Morphological Component Analysis (pGMCA) to deep, stacked Chandra ACIS-I observations of the Galactic Center to disentangle these overlapping X-ray components. By comparing the separated X-ray components with multiwavelength data, we identify the location of the reflected shock in Sgr A East and construct spatially resolved maps of Fe and S/Ar/Ca emission. The Fe emission is centrally concentrated, consistent with the properties of mixed-morphology supernova remnants. Separating the SNR emission from the shocked wind plasma around Sgr A* allows us to recover uncontaminated SNR properties and improve the robustness of the derived parameters. Spectral modeling of the isolated Sgr A East component reveals a lower ionization age and a higher electron density than previously reported, indicating strong interaction with dense surrounding material.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper applies Poissonian Generalized Morphological Component Analysis (pGMCA) to deep stacked Chandra ACIS-I observations of the Galactic Center to separate the X-ray emission of the supernova remnant Sgr A East from the overlapping stellar wind-fed plasma around Sgr A*. The authors compare the isolated components with multiwavelength data to locate the reflected shock, produce spatially resolved maps of Fe, S/Ar/Ca emission, and perform spectral modeling on the uncontaminated SNR component. They report a lower ionization age and higher electron density than prior studies, interpreting this as evidence of strong interaction with dense surrounding material.

Significance. If the component separation is robust, the work delivers the first spectrally uncontaminated view of Sgr A East, revising key plasma parameters and strengthening the case for its classification as a mixed-morphology SNR interacting with dense gas. This has direct implications for SNR evolution models in the Galactic Center environment and demonstrates the utility of morphological component analysis on blended X-ray fields. The multiwavelength morphological validation and construction of elemental maps are positive contributions.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (Component Separation): The manuscript provides no end-to-end simulation tests that inject synthetic SNR and stellar-wind components with realistic spatial overlap, Poisson statistics, and known spectral parameters, then recover the spectra to quantify leakage and bias in the fitted ionization age (τ) and electron density (n_e). Without this, the central claim of revised lower τ and higher n_e rests on an unquantified assumption of negligible contamination.
  2. [§4.3] §4.3 (Spectral Modeling): The reported shifts in ionization age and density are presented as robust improvements, yet the text does not propagate uncertainties from the pGMCA separation step into the spectral fit errors or demonstrate that residual harder wind plasma cannot systematically lower τ while raising n_e.
  3. [§4.1] §4.1 (Morphological Comparison): The multiwavelength overlays confirm the spatial location of the reflected shock but do not test whether the extracted SNR spectrum is free of spectral contamination; morphological agreement alone does not guarantee spectral purity for the derived plasma parameters.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§4.3] The notation for ionization age (τ) and electron density (n_e) should be defined explicitly on first use in the spectral fitting section, and units should be stated consistently in the text and figure captions.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (elemental maps): The color bars lack explicit units or scaling information, making it difficult to assess the dynamic range of the Fe versus S/Ar/Ca emission.
  3. [§4.3] A brief comparison table of the new τ and n_e values against the specific literature values being revised would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. We address each of the major comments below and have made revisions to the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements where possible.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] The manuscript provides no end-to-end simulation tests that inject synthetic SNR and stellar-wind components with realistic spatial overlap, Poisson statistics, and known spectral parameters, then recover the spectra to quantify leakage and bias in the fitted ionization age (τ) and electron density (n_e). Without this, the central claim of revised lower τ and higher n_e rests on an unquantified assumption of negligible contamination.

    Authors: We agree that end-to-end simulations would provide valuable quantitative validation of the component separation. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will add a new subsection in §3 describing results from such simulations. We inject synthetic SNR and stellar wind components with realistic spatial distributions, Poisson noise, and known spectral parameters into the Chandra data, then apply pGMCA and recover the spectra to measure any leakage or bias in τ and n_e. This will directly quantify the robustness of our separation and support the revised plasma parameters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.3] The reported shifts in ionization age and density are presented as robust improvements, yet the text does not propagate uncertainties from the pGMCA separation step into the spectral fit errors or demonstrate that residual harder wind plasma cannot systematically lower τ while raising n_e.

    Authors: We will update §4.3 to include an analysis of uncertainties arising from the pGMCA separation. This will involve performing spectral fits on multiple realizations of the separated components (varying the regularization parameters in pGMCA) and propagating these into the errors on τ and n_e. Additionally, we will demonstrate through spectral simulations that any residual harder wind plasma contamination would tend to increase rather than decrease the apparent ionization age, contrary to our findings, thus supporting that the observed shifts are not due to such bias. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4.1] The multiwavelength overlays confirm the spatial location of the reflected shock but do not test whether the extracted SNR spectrum is free of spectral contamination; morphological agreement alone does not guarantee spectral purity for the derived plasma parameters.

    Authors: We acknowledge the distinction between morphological and spectral validation. However, pGMCA performs a joint morphological and spectral separation, leveraging the different spatial distributions and spectral shapes of the components. The extracted SNR component shows a spectrum with prominent Fe emission lines and a thermal continuum that is softer than the stellar wind plasma, consistent with expectations for Sgr A East. The multiwavelength comparison further corroborates the spatial distribution. We will revise the text in §4.1 to explicitly discuss how the spectral properties of the separated component provide evidence against significant contamination. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper applies the external pGMCA component-separation algorithm to stacked Chandra ACIS-I data, performs multiwavelength morphological validation, extracts a spectrum for the isolated Sgr A East component, and then carries out standard spectral fitting to obtain ionization age and electron density. These fitted parameters are direct outputs of the modeling step applied to the separated data and are not equivalent to any input by construction. No self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in the provided text that would reduce the central claim to a prior result or fitted quantity. The derivation remains an independent data-analysis pipeline.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that pGMCA can reliably separate morphologically and spectrally distinct components in the Galactic Center X-ray field; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption pGMCA can separate blended X-ray components based on morphological and spectral differences
    Invoked to justify disentangling SNR emission from stellar wind plasma.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5532 in / 1186 out tokens · 46679 ms · 2026-05-10T16:58:05.143360+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Ionization Structure and Metal Enrichment of the Galactic Center Minispiral Observed with JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    JWST MIRI MRS observations show the Galactic Center Minispiral gas has 1-2.5 solar metallicity, Wolf-Rayet driven ionization, significant Ni and Fe dust destruction, and harder radiation in compact structures near Sgr A*.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P., Tollerud, E

    Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c74

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

  2. [2]

    K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., et al

    Baganoff, F. K., Maeda, Y., Morris, M., et al. 2003, ApJ, 591, 891, doi: 10.1086/375145

    work page doi:10.1086/375145 2003

  3. [3]

    2024, ApJ, 974, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c08

    Balakrishnan, M., Corrales, L., Markoff, S., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 974, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c08

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6c08

  4. [4]

    Balakrishnan, M., Russell, C. M. P., Corrales, L., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 974, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6866

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6866

  5. [5]

    E., Picquenot, A., & Acero, F

    Bobin, J., Hamzaoui, I. E., Picquenot, A., & Acero, F. 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 29, 9429, doi: 10.1109/TIP.2020.3027986

    work page doi:10.1109/tip.2020.3027986 2020

  6. [6]

    Bobin, J

    Bobin, J., Rapin, J., Larue, A., & Starck, J.-L. 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 63, 1199, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2015.2391071

    work page doi:10.1109/tsp.2015.2391071 2015

  7. [7]

    2016, A&A, 591, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527822

    Bobin, J., Sureau, F., & Starck, J.-L. 2016, A&A, 591, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201527822

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527822 2016

  8. [8]

    J., Reynolds, S

    Borkowski, K. J., Reynolds, S. P., Hwang, U., et al. 2013, ApJL, 771, L9, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/771/1/L9 Calder´ on, D., Cuadra, J., Schartmann, M., Burkert, A., &

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/771/1/l9 2013

  9. [9]

    Russell, C. M. P. 2020, ApJL, 888, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab5e81

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab5e81 2020

  10. [10]

    K., Gerhard, O., et al

    Chatzopoulos, S., Fritz, T. K., Gerhard, O., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 948, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2452

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2452 2015

  11. [11]

    L., & Ho, P

    Coil, A. L., & Ho, P. T. P. 2000, ApJ, 533, 245, doi: 10.1086/308650

    work page doi:10.1086/308650 2000

  12. [12]

    P., Shelton, R

    Cox, D. P., Shelton, R. L., Maciejewski, W., et al. 1999, ApJ, 524, 179, doi: 10.1086/307781

    work page doi:10.1086/307781 1999

  13. [13]

    Cuadra, J., Nayakshin, S., & Wang, Q. D. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 277, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv584

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv584 2015

  14. [14]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium Ehlerov´ a, S., Palouˇ s, J., Morris, M. R., et al. 2022, A&A, 668, A124, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244682

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244682 2011

  15. [15]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    work page doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 2007

  16. [16]

    M., Herter, T

    Lau, R. M., Herter, T. L., Morris, M. R., Li, Z., & Adams, J. D. 2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog (other), 0210, J/other/Sci/348

    2015

  17. [17]

    2018, ApJS, 237, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aacb24

    Limongi, M., & Chieffi, A. 2018, ApJS, 237, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aacb24

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aacb24 2018

  18. [18]

    K., Feigelson, E

    Maeda, Y., Baganoff, F. K., Feigelson, E. D., et al. 2002, ApJ, 570, 671, doi: 10.1086/339773 25 Figure 14.MergedChandraevent image created usingreproject obs, with point sources identified bywavdetectshown as green ellipses. These regions were manually refined to exclude diffuse structures misidentified as compact sources. The black diamond near the cent...

    work page doi:10.1086/339773 2002

  19. [19]

    , keywords =

    Marsh, K. A., Whitworth, A. P., Lomax, O., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 2730, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1723

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1723 2017

  20. [20]

    J., et al

    Martins, F., Genzel, R., Hillier, D. J., et al. 2007, A&A, 468, 233, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066688

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066688 2007

  21. [21]

    C., Sjouwerman, L

    McEwen, B. C., Sjouwerman, L. O., & Pihlstr¨ om, Y. M. 2016, ApJ, 832, 129, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/129

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/832/2/129 2016

  22. [22]

    2024, ApJ, 964, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad25fa

    Montez, R. 2024, ApJ, 964, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad25fa

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad25fa 2024

  23. [23]

    2005, Math

    Nesterov, Y. 2005, Math. Program., 103, 127–152, doi: 10.1007/s10107-004-0552-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10107-004-0552-5 2005

  24. [24]

    2010, PASJ, 62, 423, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.2.423

    Tatischeff, V. 2010, PASJ, 62, 423, doi: 10.1093/pasj/62.2.423

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/62.2.423 2010

  25. [25]

    2006, NuPhA, 777, 424, doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.05.008

    Maeda, K. 2006, NuPhA, 777, 424, doi: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.05.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.05.008 2006

  26. [26]

    2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02473-8

    Olivares, V., Picquenot, A., Su, Y., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02473-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02473-8 2025

  27. [27]

    2019, PASJ, 71, 52, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz025

    Ono, A., Uchiyama, H., Yamauchi, S., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 52, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz025

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz025 2019

  28. [28]

    P., Baganoff, F

    Park, S., Muno, M. P., Baganoff, F. K., et al. 2004, ApJ, 603, 548, doi: 10.1086/381542

    work page doi:10.1086/381542 2004

  29. [29]

    2006, ApJ, 643, 1011, doi: 10.1086/503273

    Paumard, T., Genzel, R., Martins, F., et al. 2006, ApJ, 643, 1011, doi: 10.1086/503273

    work page doi:10.1086/503273 2006

  30. [30]

    2019, A&A, 627, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834933

    Picquenot, A., Acero, F., Bobin, J., et al. 2019, A&A, 627, A139, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834933

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834933 2019

  31. [31]

    A., & Bobin, J

    Picquenot, A., Acero, F., Holland-Ashford, T., Lopez, L. A., & Bobin, J. 2021, A&A, 646, A82, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039170

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039170 2021

  32. [32]

    S., Greaves, J

    Pierce-Price, D., Richer, J. S., Greaves, J. S., et al. 2000, ApJL, 545, L121, doi: 10.1086/317884 Pihlstr¨ om, Y. M., & Sjouwerman, L. O. 2006, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 54, Journal of Physics Conference Series, ed. R. Sch¨ odel, G. C. Bower, M. P

    work page doi:10.1086/317884 2000

  33. [33]

    Nayakshin, & T

    Muno, S. Nayakshin, & T. Ott (IOP), 77–80, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/54/1/014

    work page doi:10.1088/1742-6596/54/1/014

  34. [34]

    L., Baganoff, F

    Rockefeller, G., Fryer, C. L., Baganoff, F. K., & Melia, F. 2005, ApJL, 635, L141, doi: 10.1086/499360

    work page doi:10.1086/499360 2005

  35. [35]

    J., Zwaan , M

    Sakano, M., Warwick, R. S., Decourchelle, A., & Predehl, P. 2004, MNRAS, 350, 129, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07571.x 26

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07571.x 2004

  36. [36]

    O., & Pihlstr¨ om, Y

    Sjouwerman, L. O., & Pihlstr¨ om, Y. M. 2008, ApJ, 681, 1287, doi: 10.1086/588753

    work page doi:10.1086/588753 2008

  37. [37]

    E., Brown, J

    Janka, H.-T. 2016, ApJ, 821, 38, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/38

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/1/38 2016

  38. [38]

    1996, ApJ, 460, 408, doi: 10.1086/176980

    Thielemann, F.-K., Nomoto, K., & Hashimoto, M.-A. 1996, ApJ, 460, 408, doi: 10.1086/176980

    work page doi:10.1086/176980 1996

  39. [39]

    2019, PASJ, 71, 105, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz089

    Tsuboi, M., Kitamura, Y., Tsutsumi, T., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 105, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz089

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz089 2019

  40. [40]

    2011, PASJ, 63, 763, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.763

    Tsuboi, M., Tadaki, K.-i., Miyazaki, A., & Handa, T. 2011, PASJ, 63, 763, doi: 10.1093/pasj/63.4.763

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/63.4.763 2011

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Vink, J. 2012, A&A Rv, 20, 49, doi: 10.1007/s00159-011-0049-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-011-0049-1 2012

  42. [42]

    Wang, Q. D. 2022, Universe, 8, 515, doi: 10.3390/universe8100515

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8100515 2022

  43. [43]

    H., Read , M

    Wang, Q. D., Dong, H., Cotera, A., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 895, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15973.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15973.x 2010

  44. [44]

    L., & Long, K

    White, R. L., & Long, K. S. 1991, ApJ, 373, 543, doi: 10.1086/170073

    work page doi:10.1086/170073 1991

  45. [45]

    E., & Weaver, T

    Woosley, S. E., & Weaver, T. A. 1995, ApJS, 101, 181, doi: 10.1086/192237 XRISM Collaboration. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.00676, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.00676

    work page doi:10.1086/192237 1995

  46. [46]

    2015, A globally convergent algorithm for nonconvex optimization based on block coordinate update

    Xu, Y., & Yin, W. 2015, A globally convergent algorithm for nonconvex optimization based on block coordinate update. https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.1386

    work page arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d0f

    Yalinewich, A., Piran, T., & Sari, R. 2017, ApJ, 838, 12, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d0f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa5d0f 2017

  48. [48]

    1986, PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York

    Yusef-Zadeh, F. 1986, PhD thesis, Columbia University, New York

    1986

  49. [49]

    H., Wardle, M., et al

    Yusef-Zadeh, F., Lacy, J. H., Wardle, M., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1429, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1429

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/2/1429 2010

  50. [50]

    1987, ApJ, 320, 545, doi: 10.1086/165572

    Yusef-Zadeh, F., & Morris, M. 1987, ApJ, 320, 545, doi: 10.1086/165572

    work page doi:10.1086/165572 1987

  51. [51]

    A., Goss, W

    Yusef-Zadeh, F., Roberts, D. A., Goss, W. M., Frail, D. A., & Green, A. J. 1996, ApJL, 466, L25, doi: 10.1086/310165 —. 1999a, ApJ, 512, 230, doi: 10.1086/306769 —. 1999b, ApJ, 512, 230, doi: 10.1086/306769

    work page doi:10.1086/310165 1996

  52. [52]

    A., & Wardle, M

    Yusef-Zadeh, F., Roberts, D. A., & Wardle, M. 1997, ApJL, 490, L83, doi: 10.1086/310997

    work page doi:10.1086/310997 1997

  53. [53]

    2005, Advances in Space Research, 35, 1074, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.057

    Yusef-Zadeh, F., Wardle, M., Muno, M., Law, C., & Pound, M. 2005, Advances in Space Research, 35, 1074, doi: 10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.057

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.057 2005

  54. [54]

    R., & Goss, W

    Zhao, J.-H., Morris, M. R., & Goss, W. M. 2013, ApJ, 777, 146, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/2/146 —. 2016, ApJ, 817, 171, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/171

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/2/146 2013