pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07691 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · 💻 cs.HC

Recognition: no theorem link

Designing Annotations in Visualization: Considerations from Visualization Practitioners and Educators

Md Dilshadur Rahman , Devin Lange , Ghulam Jilani Quadri , Paul Rosen
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords visualizationannotationsdesign practicesqualitative studypractitionerseducatorstrade-offscontextual judgments
0
0 comments X

The pith

Visualization practitioners and educators describe the heuristics and trade-offs that shape annotation design decisions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports on interviews with ten visualization practitioners and seven educators to surface the practical reasoning behind annotations. Practitioners explain the heuristics they apply when placing and styling annotations to communicate insights. Educators add perspectives on how annotations support clarity while preserving viewer agency. Together these accounts move beyond cataloging visual forms to explain the contextual judgments and trade-offs involved in annotation use. Making this design knowledge explicit can inform better tools and guidelines for creating visualizations.

Core claim

Annotation design in visualization is a contextual activity guided by heuristics and judgments that balance insight communication with concerns for clarity, guidance, and viewer agency. Interviews with practitioners reveal day-to-day considerations and trade-offs, while educator interviews situate those practices within broader teaching goals. The resulting account complements earlier work focused on annotation appearance by documenting the decision-making processes that determine when and how annotations are applied.

What carries the argument

Two-phase qualitative interview study that elicits practitioner heuristics for annotation creation and educator reflections on clarity, guidance, and viewer agency.

If this is right

  • Annotation tools could incorporate prompts or templates that reflect common trade-offs around clarity and viewer agency.
  • Guidelines for visualization design can move from form-only advice to include decision-making considerations drawn from practice.
  • Educators can use the reported reflections to structure teaching around when annotations add value versus when they may reduce viewer independence.
  • Future design work can treat annotations as an integrated activity rather than a post-hoc labeling step.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported considerations could be tested by asking new practitioners to design annotations for the same dataset and checking whether their choices align with the described heuristics.
  • These insights might extend to other visualization elements such as interaction design or color choices where similar contextual judgments occur.
  • Tool builders could prototype interfaces that let users explicitly record the trade-offs they are making when adding annotations.

Load-bearing premise

The self-reported practices from a small set of ten practitioners and seven educators represent the typical range of annotation design decisions made across the visualization community.

What would settle it

A larger survey or observational study of visualization professionals that finds annotation decisions systematically differ from or contradict the heuristics and considerations reported in these interviews.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.07691 by Devin Lange, Ghulam Jilani Quadri, Md Dilshadur Rahman, Paul Rosen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The sketches illustrate six annotation design considerations derived from interviews with practitioners (P1–P10) and educators (E1–E7). 1 Audience: decide what context must appear on the chart so it remains interpretable when reused without surrounding text. 2 Hierarchy: make the primary annotation dominant and secondary notes visually subordinate. 3 Placement: place text next to its target when possible, … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Annotation is a central mechanism in visualization design that enables people to communicate key insights. Prior research has provided essential accounts of the visual forms annotations take, but less attention has been paid to the decisions behind them. This paper examines how annotations are designed in practice and how educators reflect on those practices. We conducted a two-phase qualitative study: interviews with ten practitioners from diverse backgrounds revealed the heuristics they draw on when creating annotations, and interviews with seven visualization educators offered complementary perspectives situated within broader concerns of clarity, guidance, and viewer agency. These studies provide a systematic account of annotation design knowledge in professional settings, highlighting the considerations, trade-offs, and contextual judgments that shape the use of annotations. By making this tacit expertise explicit, our work complements prior form-focused studies, strengthens understanding of annotation as a design activity, and points to opportunities for improved tool and guideline support.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper reports results from a two-phase qualitative interview study (n=10 visualization practitioners from diverse backgrounds followed by n=7 educators) that surfaces heuristics, considerations, trade-offs, and contextual judgments practitioners use when designing annotations. The central claim is that these interviews yield a systematic account of annotation design knowledge in professional settings that complements prior form-focused work and identifies opportunities for tool and guideline support.

Significance. If the empirical account is robust, the work fills a recognized gap by shifting attention from annotation appearance to the decision-making processes that produce them. Practitioner and educator perspectives could directly inform the design of annotation tools, style guides, and curricula, and the explicit framing of trade-offs and viewer agency offers actionable design knowledge.

major comments (1)
  1. [Methods] Methods section (and abstract): The manuscript supplies no information on recruitment strategy, participant selection criteria or diversity metrics, interview protocol or guide, data analysis approach (e.g., thematic analysis method, saturation criteria, inter-rater procedures), or validation steps such as member checking. Because the central claim is that the studies provide a 'systematic account' of professional annotation design knowledge, the absence of these details makes it impossible to assess whether the reported considerations are representative or primarily reflect the specific experiences of the 17 self-selected participants.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The phrasing 'systematic account' and 'professional settings' is strong given the modest convenience sample; a more measured statement of scope would better align with the evidence presented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the referee's comments. We value the feedback and recognize the importance of methodological transparency in qualitative research. We will revise the manuscript to address the major comment on the Methods section.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods section (and abstract): The manuscript supplies no information on recruitment strategy, participant selection criteria or diversity metrics, interview protocol or guide, data analysis approach (e.g., thematic analysis method, saturation criteria, inter-rater procedures), or validation steps such as member checking. Because the central claim is that the studies provide a 'systematic account' of professional annotation design knowledge, the absence of these details makes it impossible to assess whether the reported considerations are representative or primarily reflect the specific experiences of the 17 self-selected participants.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that the current manuscript does not provide sufficient information on the methods to allow full assessment of the systematic nature of the account. This is an oversight in the submitted version. We will revise by adding a detailed Methods section that covers recruitment strategy, participant selection criteria and diversity metrics, the interview protocol and guide, data analysis approach including thematic analysis method, saturation criteria, inter-rater procedures, and validation steps such as member checking. We will also update the abstract to reflect these details. These changes will be made in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: empirical qualitative study with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

This paper reports a two-phase qualitative interview study (n=10 practitioners + n=7 educators) whose claims rest on new primary data collection and thematic analysis. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or mathematical derivations appear anywhere in the provided text or abstract. The central claim of a 'systematic account' is presented as the direct output of the described interviews rather than being defined in terms of itself or reduced to prior self-citations. No load-bearing steps invoke uniqueness theorems, ansatzes smuggled via citation, or renaming of known results. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of qualitative research in HCI with no free parameters or invented entities; the work adds an empirical account rather than new formal constructs.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Qualitative interviews can effectively surface tacit design knowledge and heuristics from practitioners and educators.
    Invoked to justify deriving a systematic account of annotation design considerations from the interview data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5450 in / 1169 out tokens · 91339 ms · 2026-05-10T18:22:47.063832+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 if FUNCTIO...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry.original add.period write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip after.block 'output.state := if FUNCTION new.sentence output.state after.block = 'skip output.state before.all = 'skip after.sentence 'output.state := if if FUNCTION not #0 #1 if FUNCTION and 'skip pop #0 i...

  3. [3]

    S., Jianu R

    Alam S. S., Jianu R. : Analyzing eye-tracking information in visualization and data space: from where on the screen to what on the screen. IEEE TVCG 23, 5 (2016), 1492--1505. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2535340 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2535340

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2535340 2016

  4. [4]

    N., Kemper W., Franconeri S

    Ajani K., Lee E., Xiong C., Knaflic C. N., Kemper W., Franconeri S. : Declutter and focus: Empirically evaluating design guidelines for effective data communication. IEEE TVCG 28, 10 (2021), 3351--3364. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3068337 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2021.3068337

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3068337 2021

  5. [5]

    two heads are better than one

    Akbaba D., Meyer M. : “two heads are better than one”: Pair-interviews for visualization. In IEEE VIS (2023), pp. 206--210. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS54172.2023.00050 doi:10.1109/VIS54172.2023.00050

    work page doi:10.1109/vis54172.2023.00050 2023

  6. [6]

    Alspaugh S., Zokaei N., Liu A., Jin C., Hearst M. A. : Futzing and moseying: Interviews with professional data analysts on exploration practices. IEEE TVCG 25, 1 (2018), 22--31. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865040 doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865040

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2018.2865040 2018

  7. [7]

    Baker S. E. : How many qualitative interviews is enough? expert voices and early career reflections on sampling and cases in qualitative research

  8. [8]

    A., Bylinskii Z., Kim N

    Borkin M. A., Bylinskii Z., Kim N. W., Bainbridge C. M., Yeh C. S., Borkin D., Pfister H., Oliva A. : Beyond memorability: Visualization recognition and recall. IEEE TVCG 22, 1 (2015), 519--528. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467732

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2015.2467732 2015

  9. [9]

    lacking open API access

    Braun V., Clarke V. : Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77--101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    work page doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa 2006

  10. [10]

    Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis,

    Braun V., Clarke V. : Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health 11, 4 (2019), 589--597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 doi:10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806

    work page doi:10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806 2019

  11. [11]

    : One size fits all? what counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328--352

    Braun V., Clarke V. : One size fits all? what counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative research in psychology 18, 3 (2021), 328--352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

    work page doi:10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238 2021

  12. [12]

    K., Chandrasegaran S., Elmqvist N

    Badam S. K., Chandrasegaran S., Elmqvist N. : Integrating annotations into multidimensional visual dashboards. Information Visualization 21, 3 (2022), 270--284. https://doi.org/10.1177/14738716221079591 doi:10.1177/14738716221079591

    work page doi:10.1177/14738716221079591 2022

  13. [13]

    : Reflections on how designers design with data

    Bigelow A., Drucker S., et al. : Reflections on how designers design with data. In ACM AVI (2014), pp. 17--24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2598153.2598175 doi:10.1145/2598153.2598175

    work page doi:10.1145/2598153.2598175 2014

  14. [14]

    Willett, Y

    Bigelow A., Drucker S., et al. : Iterating between tools to create and edit visualizations. IEEE TVCG 23, 1 (2016), 481--490. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598609 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598609

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2598609 2016

  15. [15]

    : How visualization designers perceive and use inspiration

    Baigelenov A., et al. : How visualization designers perceive and use inspiration. In ACM CHI (2025), pp. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714191 doi:10.1145/3706598.3714191

    work page doi:10.1145/3706598.3714191 2025

  16. [16]

    : On the readability of leaders in boundary labeling

    Barth L., Gemsa A., Niedermann B., N \"o llenburg M. : On the readability of leaders in boundary labeling. Information Visualization 18, 1 (2019), 110--132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871618799500 doi:10.1177/1473871618799500

    work page doi:10.1177/1473871618799500 2019

  17. [17]

    : Challenges and opportunities in data visualization education: A call to action

    Bach B., Keck M., Rajabiyazdi, et al. : Challenges and opportunities in data visualization education: A call to action. IEEE TVCG 30, 1 (2024), 649--660. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327378 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327378

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3327378 2024

  18. [18]

    : A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks

    Brehmer M., Munzner T. : A multi-level typology of abstract visualization tasks . IEEE TVCG 19, 12 (2013), 2376--2385. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.124 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.124

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.124 2013

  19. [19]

    : Analyzing gaze behavior for text-embellished narrative visualizations under different task scenarios

    Bryan C., Mishra A., Shidara H., Ma K.-L. : Analyzing gaze behavior for text-embellished narrative visualizations under different task scenarios. Visual Informatics 4, 3 (2020), 41--50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2020.08.001 doi:10.1016/j.visinf.2020.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.visinf.2020.08.001 2020

  20. [20]

    A., Niedermann B., N \"o llenburg M

    Bekos M. A., Niedermann B., N \"o llenburg M. : External labeling techniques: A taxonomy and survey. CGF 38, 3 (2019), 833--860. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13729 doi:10.1111/cgf.13729

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.13729 2019

  21. [21]

    : D ^3 data-driven documents

    Bostock M., Ogievetsky V., Heer J. : D ^3 data-driven documents. IEEE TVCG 17, 12 (2011), 2301--2309. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.185 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.185

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2011.185 2011

  22. [22]

    A., Bylinskii Z., Isola P., Sunkavalli S., Oliva A., Pfister H

    Borkin M., Vo A. A., Bylinskii Z., Isola P., Sunkavalli S., Oliva A., Pfister H. : What makes a visualization memorable? IEEE TVCG 19, 12 (2013), 2306--2315. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.234 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.234

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.234 2013

  23. [23]

    : Design patterns for data comics

    Bach B., Wang Z., Farinella M., Murray-Rust D., Henry Riche N. : Design patterns for data comics. In ACM CHI (2018), pp. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173612 doi:10.1145/3173574.3173612

    work page doi:10.1145/3173574.3173612 2018

  24. [24]

    J., Ottley A

    Bancilhon M., Wright A., Ha S., Crouser R. J., Ottley A. : Why combining text and visualization could improve bayesian reasoning: A cognitive load perspective. In ACM CHI (2023), pp. 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581218 doi:10.1145/3544548.3581218

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581218 2023

  25. [25]

    : Supporting effective common ground construction in asynchronous collaborative visual analytics

    Chen Y., Alsakran J., Barlowe S., Yang J., Zhao Y. : Supporting effective common ground construction in asynchronous collaborative visual analytics. In IEEE VAST (2011), pp. 101--110. https://doi.org/10.1109/VAST.2011.6102447 doi:10.1109/VAST.2011.6102447

    work page doi:10.1109/vast.2011.6102447 2011

  26. [26]

    : The truthful art: Data, charts, and maps for communication

    Cairo A. : The truthful art: Data, charts, and maps for communication. New Riders, 2016

    2016

  27. [27]

    G., Ding Y., Yang F., Harrison L., Kay M

    Cui Y., Lily W. G., Ding Y., Yang F., Harrison L., Kay M. : Adaptive assessment of visualization literacy. IEEE TVCG (2023). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327165 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327165

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2023.3327165 2023

  28. [28]

    : Ethical dimensions of visualization research

    Correll M. : Ethical dimensions of visualization research. In ACM CHI (2019), pp. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300418 doi:10.1145/3290605.3300418

    work page doi:10.1145/3290605.3300418 2019

  29. [29]

    : Procedural annotation of uncertain information

    Cedilnik A., Rheingans P. : Procedural annotation of uncertain information. IEEE TVCG (2000), 77--84. https://doi.org/10.1109/VISUAL.2000.885679 doi:10.1109/VISUAL.2000.885679

    work page doi:10.1109/visual.2000.885679 2000

  30. [30]

    : Designerly ways of knowing

    Cross N. : Designerly ways of knowing. Design studies 3, 4 (1982), 221--227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0 doi:10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0142-694x(82)90040-0 1982

  31. [31]

    In 2025 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)

    Chen Y., Wu Y., Shen S., Xie Y., Shen L., Xiong H., Luo Y. : Chartmark: A structured grammar for chart annotation. IEEE VIS (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/vis60296.2025.00068 doi:10.1109/vis60296.2025.00068

    work page doi:10.1109/vis60296.2025.00068 2025

  32. [32]

    : Annotating BI visualization dashboards: Needs & challenges

    Elias M., Bezerianos A. : Annotating BI visualization dashboards: Needs & challenges. In ACM CHI (2012), pp. 1641--1650. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208288 doi:10.1145/2207676.2208288

    work page doi:10.1145/2207676.2208288 2012

  33. [33]

    : How accessible is my visualization? evaluating visualization accessibility with chartability

    Elavsky F., Bennett C., Moritz D. : How accessible is my visualization? evaluating visualization accessibility with chartability. CGF 41, 3 (2022), 57--70. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14522 doi:10.1111/cgf.14522

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.14522 2022

  34. [34]

    : Annotating line charts for addressing deception

    Fan A., Ma Y., Mancenido M., Maciejewski R. : Annotating line charts for addressing deception. In ACM CHI (2022), pp. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502138 doi:10.1145/3491102.3502138

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3502138 2022

  35. [35]

    Field Methods , month = feb, date =

    Guest G., Bunce A., Johnson L. : How many interviews are enough? an experiment with data saturation and variability. Field methods 18, 1 (2006), 59--82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822x05279903 doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903

    work page doi:10.1177/1525822x05279903 2006

  36. [36]

    InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2023)

    Ge L. W., Cui Y., Kay M. : Calvi: Critical thinking assessment for literacy in visualizations. In ACM CHI (2023), pp. 1--18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581406 doi:10.1145/3544548.3581406

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3581406 2023

  37. [37]

    G., Lincoln Y

    Guba E. G., Lincoln Y. S. : Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Ectj 30, 4 (1982), 233--252. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02765185 doi:10.1007/bf02765185

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02765185 1982

  38. [38]

    : Canis: A high-level language for data-driven chart animations

    Ge T., Zhao Y., Lee B., Ren D., Chen B., Wang Y. : Canis: A high-level language for data-driven chart animations. CGF 39, 3 (2020), 607--617. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14005 doi:10.1111/cgf.14005

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.14005 2020

  39. [39]

    : Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation

    Harper D. : Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies 17, 1 (2002), 13--26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345 doi:10.1080/14725860220137345

    work page doi:10.1080/14725860220137345 2002

  40. [40]

    Harrower M., Brewer C. A. : Colorbrewer. org: an online tool for selecting colour schemes for maps. The Cartographic Journal 40, 1 (2003), 27--37. https://doi.org/10.1179/000870403235002042 doi:10.1179/000870403235002042

    work page doi:10.1179/000870403235002042 2003

  41. [41]

    Hullman and N

    Hullman J., Diakopoulos N. : Visualization rhetoric: Framing effects in narrative visualization. IEEE TVCG 17, 12 (2011), 2231--2240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2011.255 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2011.255

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2011.255 2011

  42. [42]

    : Contextifier: automatic generation of annotated stock visualizations

    Hullman J., Diakopoulos N., Adar E. : Contextifier: automatic generation of annotated stock visualizations. In ACM CHI (2013), pp. 2707--2716. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481374 doi:10.1145/2470654.2481374

    work page doi:10.1145/2470654.2481374 2013

  43. [43]

    H., Lee B., Fisher D., Adar E

    Hullman J., Drucker S., Riche N. H., Lee B., Fisher D., Adar E. : A deeper understanding of sequence in narrative visualization. IEEE TVCG 19, 12 (2013), 2406--2415. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2013.119 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2013.119

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2013.119 2013

  44. [44]

    Healey C. G. : Choosing effective colours for data visualization. In Proceedings of Seventh Annual IEEE Visualization'96 (1996), IEEE, pp. 263--270. https://doi.org/10.1109/visual.1996.568118 doi:10.1109/visual.1996.568118

    work page doi:10.1109/visual.1996.568118 1996

  45. [45]

    : Techniques for flexible responsive visualization design

    Hoffswell J., Li W., et al. : Techniques for flexible responsive visualization design. In ACM CHI (2020), pp. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376777 doi:10.1145/3313831.3376777

    work page doi:10.1145/3313831.3376777 2020

  46. [46]

    : Interactive dynamics for visual analysis

    Heer J., Shneiderman B. : Interactive dynamics for visual analysis. Communications of the ACM 55, 4 (2012), 45--54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133821 doi:10.1145/2133806.2133821

    work page doi:10.1145/2133806.2133821 2012

  47. [47]

    Joyner S. C. S., Riegelhuth A., Garrity K., Kim Y.-S., Kim N. W. : Visualization accessibility in the wild: Challenges faced by visualization designers. In ACM CHI (2022), pp. 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517630 doi:10.1145/3491102.3517630

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517630 2022

  48. [48]

    : Perceptual interpretation of ink annotations on line charts

    Kong N., Agrawala M. : Perceptual interpretation of ink annotations on line charts. In ACM UIST (2009), pp. 233--236. https://doi.org/10.1145/1622176.1622219 doi:10.1145/1622176.1622219

    work page doi:10.1145/1622176.1622219 2009

  49. [49]

    : Graphical overlays: Using layered elements to aid chart reading

    Kong N., Agrawala M. : Graphical overlays: Using layered elements to aid chart reading. IEEE TVCG 18, 12 (2012), 2631--2638. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.229 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.229

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.229 2012

  50. [50]

    : Data Visualization: a successful design process

    Kirk A. : Data Visualization: a successful design process. Packt Pub., 2012

    2012

  51. [51]

    One-Size-Fits-All

    Kong H.-K., Liu Z., et al. : Trust and recall of information across varying degrees of title-visualization misalignment. In ACM CHI (2019), pp. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300576 doi:10.1145/3290605.3300576

    work page doi:10.1145/3290605.3300576 2019

  52. [52]

    : Internal and external visual cue preferences for visualizations in presentations

    Kong H.-K., Liu Z., Karahalios K. : Internal and external visual cue preferences for visualizations in presentations. CGF 36, 3 (2017), 515--525. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13207 doi:10.1111/cgf.13207

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.13207 2017

  53. [53]

    : Frames and slants in titles of visualizations on controversial topics

    Kong H.-K., Liu Z., Karahalios K. : Frames and slants in titles of visualizations on controversial topics. In ACM CHI (2018), pp. 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174012 doi:10.1145/3173574.3174012

    work page doi:10.1145/3173574.3174012 2018

  54. [54]

    : Cicero: A declarative grammar for responsive visualization

    Kim H., Rossi R., Du F., Koh E., Guo S., Hullman J., Hoffswell J. : Cicero: A declarative grammar for responsive visualization. In ACM CHI (2022), pp. 1--15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517455 doi:10.1145/3491102.3517455

    work page doi:10.1145/3491102.3517455 2022

  55. [55]

    : Characterizing the intelligence analysis process through a longitudinal field study: Implications for visual analytics

    Kang Y.-a., Stasko J. : Characterizing the intelligence analysis process through a longitudinal field study: Implications for visual analytics. Information Visualization 13, 2 (2014), 134--158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473871612468877 doi:10.1177/1473871612468877

    work page doi:10.1177/1473871612468877 2014

  56. [56]

    H., Setlur V., Agrawala M

    Kim D. H., Setlur V., Agrawala M. : Towards understanding how readers integrate charts and captions: A case study with line charts. In ACM CHI (2021), pp. 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445443 doi:10.1145/3411764.3445443

    work page doi:10.1145/3411764.3445443 2021

  57. [57]

    Lee S., Kim S.-H., Kwon B. C. : Vlat: Development of a visualization literacy assessment test. IEEE TVCG 23, 1 (2016), 551--560. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598920 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2016.2598920

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2016.2598920 2016

  58. [58]

    Ericson, David Weintrop, and Tovi Grossman

    Lisnic M., Polychronis C., et al. : Misleading beyond visual tricks: How people actually lie with charts. In ACM CHI (2023), pp. 1--21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3580910 doi:10.1145/3544548.3580910

    work page doi:10.1145/3544548.3580910 2023

  59. [59]

    H., Isenberg P., Carpendale S

    Lee B., Riche N. H., Isenberg P., Carpendale S. : More than telling a story: Transforming data into visually shared stories. IEEE CG&A 35, 5 (2015), 84--90. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2015.99 doi:10.1109/MCG.2015.99

    work page doi:10.1109/mcg.2015.99 2015

  60. [60]

    : Authoring combined textual and visual descriptions of graph data

    Latif S., Su K., Beck F. : Authoring combined textual and visual descriptions of graph data. In EuroVis (Short Papers) (2019), pp. 115--119. https://doi.org/10.2312/evs.20191180 doi:10.2312/evs.20191180

    work page doi:10.2312/evs.20191180 2019

  61. [61]

    : Criteria for rigor in visualization design study

    Meyer M., Dykes J. : Criteria for rigor in visualization design study. IEEE TVCG 26, 1 (2019), 87--97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934539 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934539

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2019.2934539 2019

  62. [62]

    : Assessing the effect of visualizations on bayesian reasoning through crowdsourcing

    Micallef L., Dragicevic P., Fekete J.-D. : Assessing the effect of visualizations on bayesian reasoning through crowdsourcing. IEEE TVCG 18, 12 (2012), 2536--2545. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2012.199 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2012.199

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2012.199 2012

  63. [63]

    D., Guassora A

    Malterud K., Siersma V. D., Guassora A. D. : Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qualitative health research 26, 13 (2016), 1753--1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444 doi:10.1177/1049732315617444

    work page doi:10.1177/1049732315617444 2016

  64. [64]

    : Supporting communication and coordination in collaborative sensemaking

    Mahyar N., Tory M. : Supporting communication and coordination in collaborative sensemaking. IEEE TVCG 20, 12 (2014), 1633--1642. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346573 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2014.2346573

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2014.2346573 2014

  65. [65]

    : Visualization analysis and design

    Munzner T. : Visualization analysis and design. CRC press, Boca Raton FL, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17511 doi:10.1201/b17511

    work page doi:10.1201/b17511 2014

  66. [66]

    S., Norris J

    Nowell L. S., Norris J. M., White D. E., Moules N. J. : Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International journal of qualitative methods 16, 1 (2017), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847 doi:10.1177/1609406917733847

    work page doi:10.1177/1609406917733847 2017

  67. [67]

    : Understanding data visualization design practice

    Parsons P. : Understanding data visualization design practice. IEEE TVCG 28, 1 (2021), 665--675. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114959 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114959

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2021.3114959 2021

  68. [68]

    : Effective annotations over 3D models

    Ponchio F., Callieri M., Dellepiane M., Scopigno R. : Effective annotations over 3D models. CGF 39, 1 (2020), 89--105. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13664 doi:10.1111/cgf.13664

    work page doi:10.1111/cgf.13664 2020

  69. [69]

    : Data visualization practitioners’ perspectives on chartjunk

    Parsons P., Gray C. M., Baigelenov A., Carr I. : Design judgment in data visualization practice. In IEEE VIS (2020), IEEE, pp. 176--180. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00042 doi:10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00042

    work page doi:10.1109/vis47514.2020.00042 2020

  70. [70]

    A., Horwitz S

    Palinkas L. A., Horwitz S. M., et al. : Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and policy in mental health and mental health services research 42, 5 (2015), 533--544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y 2015

  71. [71]

    : The tacit dimension

    Polanyi M. : The tacit dimension. In Knowledge in organisations. Routledge, 2009, pp. 135--146

    2009

  72. [72]

    In 2025 IEEE Visualization and Visual Analytics (VIS)

    Parsons P. C., Ridley A. : Judgment as coordination: A joint systems view of visualization design practice. IEEE VIS (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS60296.2025.00062 doi:10.1109/VIS60296.2025.00062

    work page doi:10.1109/vis60296.2025.00062 2025

  73. [73]

    : Data visualization practitioners’ perspectives on chartjunk

    Parsons P., Shukla P. : Data visualization practitioners’ perspectives on chartjunk. In IEEE VIS (2020), pp. 211--215. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00049 doi:10.1109/VIS47514.2020.00049

    work page doi:10.1109/vis47514.2020.00049 2020

  74. [74]

    C., Shukla P

    Parsons P. C., Shukla P. C. : Beyond problem solving: Framing and problem-solution co-evolution in data visualization design. IEEE TVCG (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3633866 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2025.3633866

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3633866 2025

  75. [75]

    : Fixation and creativity in data visualization design: Experiences and perspectives of practitioners

    Parsons P., Shukla P., Park C. : Fixation and creativity in data visualization design: Experiences and perspectives of practitioners. In IEEE VIS (2021), IEEE, pp. 76--80. https://doi.org/10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623297 doi:10.1109/VIS49827.2021.9623297

    work page doi:10.1109/vis49827.2021.9623297 2021

  76. [76]

    : Chartaccent: Annotation for data-driven storytelling

    Ren D., Brehmer M., et al. : Chartaccent: Annotation for data-driven storytelling. In IEEE PacificVIs (2017), pp. 230--239. https://doi.org/10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031599 doi:10.1109/PACIFICVIS.2017.8031599

    work page doi:10.1109/pacificvis.2017.8031599 2017

  77. [77]

    D., Doppalapudi B., Quadri G

    Rahman M. D., Doppalapudi B., Quadri G. J., Rosen P. : A survey on annotations in information visualization: Empirical studies, applications and challenges. IEEE TVCG (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2025.3600957 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2025.3600957

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2025.3600957 2025

  78. [78]

    : Activeink: (th) inking with data

    Romat H., Henry Riche N., et al. : Activeink: (th) inking with data. In ACM CHI (2019), pp. 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300272 doi:10.1145/3290605.3300272

    work page doi:10.1145/3290605.3300272 2019

  79. [79]

    D., Quadri G

    Rahman M. D., Quadri G. J., Doppalapudi B., Szafir D. A., Rosen P. : A qualitative analysis of common practices in annotations: A taxonomy and design space. IEEE TVCG (2025). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456359 doi:10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456359

    work page doi:10.1109/tvcg.2024.3456359 2025

  80. [80]

    D., Quadri G

    Rahman M. D., Quadri G. J., Rosen P. : Exploring annotation strategies in professional visualizations: Insights from prominent US news portals. VisComm Workshop at IEEE VIS (2023). https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/fd8zj doi:10.31219/osf.io/fd8zj

    work page doi:10.31219/osf.io/fd8zj 2023

Showing first 80 references.