pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.08221 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Co-operating multiorbital and nonlocal correlations in bilayer nickelate

Evgeny A. Stepanov , Steffen B\"otzel , Ilya M. Eremin , Frank Lechermann
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 17:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords bilayer nickelateLa3Ni2O7multiorbital correlationsnonlocal self-energyspin polaronsshadow bandsARPES
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multiorbital and nonlocal correlations in bilayer nickelates produce competing states with spin-polaron shadow bands.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper models the high-pressure normal state of La3Ni2O7 with an effective three-orbital description solved by a method that includes momentum-dependent self-energy effects beyond standard dynamical mean-field theory. Depending on the strength of interorbital repulsion, the flat gamma band either sits below the Fermi level or crosses it; the crossing case produces spin polarons formed by electron scattering off paramagnon excitations, which appear as an incoherent shadow band of spectral weight below the Fermi energy. These extra low-energy configurations add to the known competing phases and are proposed as a possible resolution for conflicting angle-resolved photoemission results on the same material.

Core claim

Within an effective three-orbital model solved beyond dynamical mean-field theory, the interplay of multiorbital physics and nonlocal self-energy effects yields two distinct low-energy regimes controlled by interorbital interaction strength: the notorious flat gamma quasiparticle band either lies entirely in the occupied spectrum or crosses the Fermi level, in which case electron-paramagnon scattering generates spin-polaron bound states visible as a shadow band carrying incoherent spectral weight below the Fermi level.

What carries the argument

Effective three-orbital model solved with an advanced many-body solver that captures k-dependent correlations beyond dynamical mean-field theory.

If this is right

  • Additional competing low-energy states exist in bilayer nickelates beyond previously discussed phases.
  • Spin-polaron formation can produce bound states that appear as shadow bands in the spectral function.
  • The position of the flat gamma band relative to the Fermi level depends sensitively on interorbital interaction strength.
  • These states offer a possible explanation for the observed controversy in recent ARPES experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Nonlocal correlation effects may be essential for interpreting normal-state spectra in other layered nickelates under pressure.
  • Similar spin-polaron mechanisms could be tested by looking for shadow bands in related materials with comparable orbital fillings.
  • The dependence on interorbital interaction suggests that small changes in doping or pressure could switch between the occupied-band and crossing-band regimes.

Load-bearing premise

The effective three-orbital model plus the chosen advanced many-body solver accurately capture the k-dependent correlations and low-energy physics of the high-pressure normal state without missing essential degrees of freedom.

What would settle it

High-resolution angle-resolved photoemission spectra of high-pressure La3Ni2O7 that either clearly detect or definitively rule out an incoherent shadow band below the Fermi level with the predicted momentum dependence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.08221 by Evgeny A. Stepanov, Frank Lechermann, Ilya M. Eremin, Steffen B\"otzel.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Model setup for La [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Calculated momentum-resolved electronic spectral [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Calculated momentum- and orbital-resolved static [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The interplay of multiorbital physics and nonlocal self-energy effects is studied within an effective three-orbital model for the high-pressure normal state of superconducting bilayer nickelate La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$. The model is solved within an advanced many-body framework capturing $k$-dependent correlations beyond dynamical mean-field theory. Different low-energy scenarios subtly depend on the strength of the interorbital interaction, either placing the notorious flat $\gamma$ quasiparticle band in the occupied part of the spectrum, or letting it cross the Fermi level. In the latter case, intriguing spin-polaron formation due to the scattering of electrons with paramagnon excitations takes place. This leads to bound states appearing as a shadow band with incoherent low-energy spectral weight below the Fermi level. Our results uncover additional competing states that exist in bilayer nickelates and could explain the controversy of recent angle-resolved photoemission experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the interplay of multiorbital physics and nonlocal self-energy effects in an effective three-orbital model for the high-pressure normal state of superconducting bilayer nickelate La₃Ni₂O₇. Solved with an advanced many-body framework beyond DMFT that captures k-dependent correlations, the work finds that low-energy scenarios (position of the flat γ quasiparticle band relative to E_F and formation of spin-polaron bound states appearing as a shadow band) depend subtly on the interorbital interaction strength; in the case where the γ band crosses E_F, paramagnon scattering produces incoherent spectral weight below E_F. The authors argue these competing states help explain recent ARPES controversies.

Significance. If the central results hold under the chosen interaction value, the paper would usefully highlight how nonlocal correlations and multiorbital effects generate additional low-energy features in bilayer nickelates, offering a possible resolution to ARPES discrepancies on the flat band. The use of a solver beyond DMFT is a strength for addressing momentum-dependent physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results] Abstract and results discussion: the claim that spin-polaron shadow bands explain the ARPES controversy is load-bearing on the interorbital interaction strength being tuned such that the γ band crosses E_F (rather than remaining occupied). This strength functions as a free parameter without independent constraint from the model equations or a demonstrated robustness scan across a plausible range, raising the risk that the shadow band is an artifact of a narrow window rather than a generic feature.
  2. [Model and method] Model and method sections: the effective three-orbital model plus the chosen solver is asserted to capture the k-dependent correlations and low-energy physics without missing essential degrees of freedom, yet the subtlety of the γ-band position and shadow-band formation on the interaction value makes it necessary to quantify how sensitive the conclusions are to this assumption or to compare against alternative models.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions and parameter tables should explicitly state the numerical value(s) of the interorbital interaction used for each panel and whether results persist under small variations.
  2. [Notation] Notation for the γ band, shadow band, and paramagnon excitations should be defined consistently in the text and figures to avoid ambiguity for readers unfamiliar with the specific ARPES controversy.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and committing to revisions that will strengthen the presentation of our results without altering the core findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results] Abstract and results discussion: the claim that spin-polaron shadow bands explain the ARPES controversy is load-bearing on the interorbital interaction strength being tuned such that the γ band crosses E_F (rather than remaining occupied). This strength functions as a free parameter without independent constraint from the model equations or a demonstrated robustness scan across a plausible range, raising the risk that the shadow band is an artifact of a narrow window rather than a generic feature.

    Authors: We agree that the emergence of the spin-polaron shadow band is tied to the regime in which the γ quasiparticle band crosses the Fermi level, which in turn depends on the interorbital interaction strength. This dependence is already noted in the manuscript as part of the subtle competition between different low-energy scenarios. The specific value used is motivated by estimates from ab initio constrained calculations for the nickelate system and is chosen to place the system in the regime consistent with certain ARPES reports of a crossing band. We acknowledge that a broader parameter scan would better demonstrate robustness. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary figure showing the γ-band position and spectral features across a range of interorbital interaction strengths (approximately ±20% around the chosen value), confirming that the shadow band appears generically once the band crosses E_F and is not confined to an unphysically narrow window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model and method] Model and method sections: the effective three-orbital model plus the chosen solver is asserted to capture the k-dependent correlations and low-energy physics without missing essential degrees of freedom, yet the subtlety of the γ-band position and shadow-band formation on the interaction value makes it necessary to quantify how sensitive the conclusions are to this assumption or to compare against alternative models.

    Authors: The three-orbital model is obtained by downfolding the full DFT band structure onto the Ni d_{x²-y²}, d_{z²}, and d_{xy} orbitals that dominate the low-energy physics near the Fermi level in the high-pressure phase; this choice is standard in the literature for bilayer nickelates and retains the essential orbital degrees of freedom. The solver (a diagrammatic extension beyond DMFT that includes momentum-dependent self-energy) is selected precisely to capture the nonlocal correlations responsible for the paramagnon scattering and shadow-band formation. We will expand the method section to include a short justification of the orbital truncation and a reference to why two-orbital models miss the interorbital scattering channel that stabilizes the shadow band. In addition, the parameter scan mentioned in response to the first comment will directly quantify the sensitivity of the γ-band position and shadow-band intensity to the interorbital interaction, thereby addressing the robustness concern within the present framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; parameter dependence is explicit model exploration

full rationale

The paper solves an effective three-orbital model for the bilayer nickelate using an advanced many-body solver that captures k-dependent correlations. It explicitly states that low-energy scenarios (gamma-band position and spin-polaron shadow band) depend on the interorbital interaction strength and presents both cases without claiming one is derived from first principles or fitted to force a specific outcome. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the central claim to its own inputs are present. The results are direct numerical outputs for chosen parameter values, and the interpretive link to ARPES controversy does not constitute a circular reduction by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the effective three-orbital Hamiltonian and the numerical accuracy of the nonlocal solver; both are taken as given without independent derivation in the provided abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • interorbital interaction strength
    Varied across scenarios to control whether the gamma band is occupied or crosses the Fermi level.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Effective three-orbital model faithfully represents the high-pressure normal state of La3Ni2O7
    Invoked as the starting point for all calculations.
invented entities (1)
  • spin-polaron bound state no independent evidence
    purpose: To produce the shadow band via electron-paramagnon scattering
    Introduced to interpret the incoherent spectral weight below the Fermi level.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1329 out tokens · 31632 ms · 2026-05-10T17:55:04.536584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Correlation-Driven Orbital-Selective Fermiology and Superconductivity in the Bilayer Nickelate La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$

    cond-mat.str-el 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Correlations in the nickelate drive the gamma band below the Fermi level and shift the dominant superconducting pairing to d_x2-y2 interlayer spin-singlet mediated by antiferromagnetism and Hund's coupling.

  2. Superconductivity in bilayer La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$: A review focusing on the strong-coupling Hund's rule assisted pairing mechanism

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 3.0

    Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 arises from interlayer Cooper pairs of 3d_x2-y2 electrons driven by effective J_perp from Hund-assisted AFM exchange transfer, while localized 3d_z2 electrons form rung singlets that prod...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Quantum magnetism and criticality,

    S. Sachdev, “Quantum magnetism and criticality,” Na- ture Phys.4, 173 (2008)

    2008

  2. [2]

    From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides,

    B. Keimer, S. A. Kivelson, M. R. Norman, S. Uchida, and J. Zaanen, “From quantum matter to high- temperature superconductivity in copper oxides,” Nature 518, 179 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    Antiferromag- netism and d-wave superconductivity in cuprates: A cluster dynamical mean-field theory,

    A. I. Lichtenstein and M. I. Katsnelson, “Antiferromag- netism and d-wave superconductivity in cuprates: A cluster dynamical mean-field theory,” Phys. Rev. B62, R9283–R9286 (2000)

    2000

  4. [4]

    Cluster Dynam- ical Mean Field Analysis of the Mott Transition,

    O. Parcollet, G. Biroli, and G. Kotliar, “Cluster Dynam- ical Mean Field Analysis of the Mott Transition,” Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 226402 (2004)

    2004

  5. [5]

    Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: a new paradigm for super- conductivity,

    Rafael M. Fernandes, Amalia I. Coldea, Hong Ding, Ian R. Fisher, P. J. Hirschfeld, and Gabriel Kotlia, “Iron pnictides and chalcogenides: a new paradigm for super- conductivity,” Nature601, 35 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    Signatures of superconductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure,

    Hualei Sun, Mengwu Huo, Xunwu Hu, Jingyuan Li, Yifeng Han, Lingyun Tang, Zhongquan Mao, Peng- tao Yang, Bosen Wang, Jinguang Cheng, Dao-Xin Yao, Guang-Ming Zhang, and Meng Wang, “Signatures of superconductivity near 80 k in a nickelate under high pressure,” Nature621, 493–498 (2023)

    2023

  7. [7]

    Signa- tures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7,

    Eun Kyo Ko, Yijun Yu, Yidi Liu, Lopa Bhatt, Jiarui Li, Vivek Thampy, Cheng-Tai Kuo, Bai Yang Wang, Yonghun Lee, Kyuho Lee, Jun-Sik Lee, Berit H. Goodge, David A. Muller, and Harold Y. Hwang, “Signa- tures of ambient pressure superconductivity in thin film La3Ni2O7,” Nature638, 935 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    Ambient- pressure superconductivity onset above 40 k in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films,

    Guangdi Zhou, Wei Lv, Heng Wang, Zihao Nie, Yaqi Chen, Yueying Li, Haoliang Huang, Weiqiang Chen, Yu- jie Sun, Qi-Kun Xue, and Zhuoyu Chen, “Ambient- pressure superconductivity onset above 40 k in bilayer nickelate ultrathin films,” Nature640, 641 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Low-energy perspective of interacting electrons in the normal state of superconducting bilayer nickelate,

    Frank Lechermann, Steffen B¨ otzel, and Ilya M. Eremin, “Low-energy perspective of interacting electrons in the normal state of superconducting bilayer nickelate,” Preprint arXiv:2503.12412 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Charge distribution and magnetism in bi- layer La 3Ni2O7: a hybrid functional study,

    Kateryna Foyevtsova, Ilya Elfimov, and George A. Sawatzky, “Charge distribution and magnetism in bi- layer La 3Ni2O7: a hybrid functional study,” Preprint arXiv:2507.08123 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Pressure and strain effects on the ab initioGWelectronic struc- ture of La 3Ni2O7,

    Jean-Baptiste de Vaulx, Quintin N. Meier, Pierre Toule- monde, Andr´ es Cano, and Valerio Olevano, “Pressure and strain effects on the ab initioGWelectronic struc- ture of La 3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. B112, 085143 (2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    Electronic structures and multi- orbital models of La 3Ni2O7 thin films at ambient pres- sure,

    Xunwu Hu, Wenyuan Qiu, Cui-Qun Chen, Zhihui Luo, and Dao-Xin Yao, “Electronic structures and multi- orbital models of La 3Ni2O7 thin films at ambient pres- sure,” Commun. Phys.8, 506 (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    Bilayer Two-Orbital Model of La3Ni2O7 under Pressure,

    Zhihui Luo, Xunwu Hu, Meng Wang, W´ ei W´ u, and Dao- Xin Yao, “Bilayer Two-Orbital Model of La3Ni2O7 under Pressure,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 126001 (2023)

    2023

  14. [14]

    Electronic correlations and supercon- ducting instability in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure,

    Frank Lechermann, Jannik Gondolf, Steffen B¨ otzel, and Ilya M. Eremin, “Electronic correlations and supercon- ducting instability in La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure,” Phys. Rev. B108, L201121 (2023)

    2023

  15. [15]

    Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital- selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bi- layer nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7 under pres- sure,

    Yang Zhang, Ling-Fang Lin, Adriana Moreo, and Elbio Dagotto, “Electronic structure, dimer physics, orbital- selective behavior, and magnetic tendencies in the bi- layer nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7 under pres- sure,” Phys. Rev. B108, L180510 (2023)

    2023

  16. [16]

    Correlated electronic structure, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic corre- lations in double-layer La 3Ni2O7 under pressure,

    D. A. Shilenko and I. V. Leonov, “Correlated electronic structure, orbital-selective behavior, and magnetic corre- lations in double-layer La 3Ni2O7 under pressure,” Phys. Rev. B108, 125105 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Charge and spin instabilities in supercon- ducting La3Ni2O7,

    Xuejiao Chen, Peiheng Jiang, Jie Li, Zhicheng Zhong, and Yi Lu, “Charge and spin instabilities in supercon- ducting La3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. B111, 014515 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    Possible HighTc Superconductiv- ity in La 3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifes- tation of a Nearly Half-Filled Bilayer Hubbard Model,

    Hirofumi Sakakibara, Naoya Kitamine, Masayuki Ochi, and Kazuhiko Kuroki, “Possible HighTc Superconductiv- ity in La 3Ni2O7 under High Pressure through Manifes- tation of a Nearly Half-Filled Bilayer Hubbard Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 106002 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Correlated Electronic Structure of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure,

    Viktor Christiansson, Francesco Petocchi, and Philipp Werner, “Correlated Electronic Structure of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 206501 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Possibles ±-wave superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7,

    Qing-Geng Yang, Da Wang, and Qiang-Hua Wang, “Possibles ±-wave superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. B108, L140505 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Interplay of twoE g orbitals in superconducting 6 La3Ni2O7 under pressure,

    Chen Lu, Zhiming Pan, Fan Yang, and Congjun Wu, “Interplay of twoE g orbitals in superconducting 6 La3Ni2O7 under pressure,” Phys. Rev. B110, 094509 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    s ±-Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical-Oxygen Deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under Pres- sure,

    Yu-Bo Liu, Jia-Wei Mei, Fei Ye, Wei-Qiang Chen, and Fan Yang, “s ±-Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical-Oxygen Deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under Pres- sure,” Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236002 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc superconductivity of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure,

    Yi-feng Yang, Guang-Ming Zhang, and Fu-Chun Zhang, “Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc superconductivity of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure,” Phys. Rev. B108, L201108 (2023)

    2023

  24. [24]

    Bilayert−J−J ⊥ Model and Magnetically Mediated Pairing in the Pressur- ized Nickelate La3Ni2O7,

    Xing-Zhou Qu, Dai-Wei Qu, Jialin Chen, Congjun Wu, Fan Yang, Wei Li, and Gang Su, “Bilayert−J−J ⊥ Model and Magnetically Mediated Pairing in the Pressur- ized Nickelate La3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036502 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Pressure Driven Fractionalization of Ionic Spins Results in Cupratelike High-T c Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7,

    Ruoshi Jiang, Jinning Hou, Zhiyu Fan, Zi-Jian Lang, and Wei Ku, “Pressure Driven Fractionalization of Ionic Spins Results in Cupratelike High-T c Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 126503 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    High-Tc superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 based on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model,

    Zhihui Luo, Biao Lv, Meng Wang, W´ ei W´ u, and Dao-Xin Yao, “High-Tc superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 based on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model,” npj Quantum Mater. 9, 61 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Type-IIt−Jmodel and shared superexchange coupling from Hund’s rule in superconducting La 3Ni2O7,

    Hanbit Oh and Ya-Hui Zhang, “Type-IIt−Jmodel and shared superexchange coupling from Hund’s rule in superconducting La 3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. B108, 174511 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Quenched Pair Breaking by Interlayer Correlations as a Key to Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7,

    Siheon Ryee, Niklas Witt, and Tim O. Wehling, “Quenched Pair Breaking by Interlayer Correlations as a Key to Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096002 (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    Competingd xy ands ± pairing symmetries in supercon- ducting La 3Ni2O7: LDA + FLEX calculations,

    Griffin Heier, Kyungwha Park, and Sergey Y. Savrasov, “Competingd xy ands ± pairing symmetries in supercon- ducting La 3Ni2O7: LDA + FLEX calculations,” Phys. Rev. B109, 104508 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Structural transitions, oc- tahedral rotations, and electronic properties of A 3Ni2O7 rare-earth nickelates under high pressure,

    B. Geisler, J. J. Hamlin, G. R. Stewart, R. G. Hen- nig, and P. J. Hirschfeld, “Structural transitions, oc- tahedral rotations, and electronic properties of A 3Ni2O7 rare-earth nickelates under high pressure,” npj Quantum Mater.9, 38 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Role of correlations in Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer nickelates under compressive strain,

    Logan Bleys, Nicholas Corkill, Yi-Feng Zhao, Gheo- rghe Lucian Pascut, Harrison LaBollita, Antia S. Botana, and Khandker F. Quader, “Role of correlations in Ruddlesden-Popper bilayer nickelates under compressive strain,” Preprint arXiv:2509.00940 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Ef- fective Bi-Layer Model Hamiltonian and Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Study for the High-Tc Supercon- ductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure,

    Yang Shen, Mingpu Qin, and Guang-Ming Zhang, “Ef- fective Bi-Layer Model Hamiltonian and Density-Matrix Renormalization Group Study for the High-Tc Supercon- ductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure,” Chin. Phys. Lett.40, 127401 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    Bound-State of superfluous electron and spin-wave in ferromagnetic chains,

    M. I. Katsnelson, “Bound-State of superfluous electron and spin-wave in ferromagnetic chains,” Fiz. Met. Met- alloved.54, 396 (1982)

    1982

  34. [34]

    From Hubbard bands to spin-polaron excitations in the doped Mott material NaxCoO2,

    Aljoscha Wilhelm, Frank Lechermann, Hartmut Hafer- mann, Mikhail I. Katsnelson, and Alexander I. Lichten- stein, “From Hubbard bands to spin-polaron excitations in the doped Mott material NaxCoO2,” Phys. Rev. B91, 155114 (2015)

    2015

  35. [35]

    Non-Fermi-liquid behaviour and Fermi- surface expansion induced by van Hove-driven ferromag- netic fluctuations: the D-TRILEX analysis,

    Ilia S. Dedov, Andrey A. Katanin, and Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Non-Fermi-liquid behaviour and Fermi- surface expansion induced by van Hove-driven ferromag- netic fluctuations: the D-TRILEX analysis,” Preprint arXiv:2511.14614 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Consistent partial bosonization of the extended Hub- bard model,

    E. A. Stepanov, V. Harkov, and A. I. Lichtenstein, “Consistent partial bosonization of the extended Hub- bard model,” Phys. Rev. B100, 205115 (2019)

    2019

  37. [37]

    Impact of partially bosonized col- lective fluctuations on electronic degrees of freedom,

    V. Harkov, M. Vandelli, S. Brener, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. A. Stepanov, “Impact of partially bosonized col- lective fluctuations on electronic degrees of freedom,” Phys. Rev. B103, 245123 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Multi-band D-TRILEX approach to materials with strong electronic correlations,

    M. Vandelli, J. Kaufmann, M. El-Nabulsi, V. Harkov, A. I. Lichtenstein, and E. A. Stepanov, “Multi-band D-TRILEX approach to materials with strong electronic correlations,” SciPost Phys.13, 036 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Coexist- ing charge density wave and ferromagnetic instabilities in monolayer InSe,

    E. A. Stepanov, V. Harkov, M. R¨ osner, A. I. Lichten- stein, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. N. Rudenko, “Coexist- ing charge density wave and ferromagnetic instabilities in monolayer InSe,” npj Comput. Mater.8, 118 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    Doping-dependent Charge- and Spin-Density Wave Orderings in a Mono- layer of Pb Adatoms on Si(111),

    M. Vandelli, A. Galler, A. Rubio, A. I. Lichtenstein, S. Biermann, and E. A. Stepanov, “Doping-dependent Charge- and Spin-Density Wave Orderings in a Mono- layer of Pb Adatoms on Si(111),” npj Quantum Mater. 9, 19 (2024)

    2024

  41. [41]

    Interconnected renormalization of Hub- bard bands and Green’s function zeros in Mott insulators induced by strong magnetic fluctuations,

    E. A. Stepanov, M. Chatzieleftheriou, N. Wagner, and G. Sangiovanni, “Interconnected renormalization of Hub- bard bands and Green’s function zeros in Mott insulators induced by strong magnetic fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. B 110, L161106 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Local and Nonlocal Electronic Correlations at the Metal-Insulator Transition in the Two-Dimensional Hub- bard Model,

    M. Chatzieleftheriou, S. Biermann, and E. A. Stepanov, “Local and Nonlocal Electronic Correlations at the Metal-Insulator Transition in the Two-Dimensional Hub- bard Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 236504 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Fingerprints of a charge ice state in the doped Mott insulator Nb 3Cl8,

    Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Fingerprints of a charge ice state in the doped Mott insulator Nb 3Cl8,” Phys. Rev. B112, 045131 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Superconductivity of bad fermions and the origin of two gaps in cuprates,

    E. A. Stepanov, S. Iskakov, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. I. Lichtenstein, “Superconductivity of bad fermions and the origin of two gaps in cuprates,” Commun. Phys.9, 91 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    Orbital Isotropy of Magnetic Fluctuations in Correlated Electron Materials Induced by Hund’s Exchange Coupling,

    Evgeny A. Stepanov, Yusuke Nomura, Alexander I. Lichtenstein, and Silke Biermann, “Orbital Isotropy of Magnetic Fluctuations in Correlated Electron Materials Induced by Hund’s Exchange Coupling,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 207205 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    Eliminating Orbital Selectivity from the Metal-Insulator Transition by Strong Magnetic Fluctuations,

    Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Eliminating Orbital Selectivity from the Metal-Insulator Transition by Strong Magnetic Fluctuations,” Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 096404 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Extended regime of metastable metallic and insulating phases in a two- orbital electronic system,

    M. Vandelli, J. Kaufmann, V. Harkov, A. I. Lichten- stein, K. Held, and E. A. Stepanov, “Extended regime of metastable metallic and insulating phases in a two- orbital electronic system,” Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022016 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Can Orbital- Selective N´ eel Transitions Survive Strong Nonlocal Elec- tronic Correlations?

    Evgeny A. Stepanov and Silke Biermann, “Can Orbital- Selective N´ eel Transitions Survive Strong Nonlocal Elec- tronic Correlations?” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 226501 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Charge Density Wave Ordering in NdNiO2: Effects of Multiorbital Nonlocal Correlations,

    E. A. Stepanov, M. Vandelli, A. I. Lichtenstein, and F. Lechermann, “Charge Density Wave Ordering in NdNiO2: Effects of Multiorbital Nonlocal Correlations,” npj Comput. Mater.10, 108 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Nature of momentum- and orbital-dependent magnetic fluctua- tions in Sr 2RuO4,

    Maria Chatzieleftheriou, Alexander N. Rudenko, Yvan Sidis, Silke Biermann, and Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Nature of momentum- and orbital-dependent magnetic fluctua- tions in Sr 2RuO4,” Phys. Rev. B112, 195118 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Dual-space cluster-diagrammatic approach to nonlocal electronic correlations,

    F´ elix Fossati and Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Dual-space cluster-diagrammatic approach to nonlocal electronic correlations,” Phys. Rev. B113, 075149 (2026)

    2026

  52. [52]

    Electron-magnon dynamics triggered by an ultrashort laser pulse: A real-time dualGWstudy,

    Nagamalleswararao Dasari, Hugo U. R. Strand, Mar- 7 tin Eckstein, Alexander I. Lichtenstein, and Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Electron-magnon dynamics triggered by an ultrashort laser pulse: A real-time dualGWstudy,” Phys. Rev. B111, 235129 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Nonlocal Correlation Effects in dc and Op- tical Conductivity of the Hubbard Model,

    Nagamalleswararao Dasari, Hugo U. R. Strand, Mar- tin Eckstein, Alexander I. Lichtenstein, and Evgeny A. Stepanov, “Nonlocal Correlation Effects in dc and Op- tical Conductivity of the Hubbard Model,” Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 106905 (2026)

    2026

  54. [54]

    Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo method for fermions,

    A. N. Rubtsov, V. V. Savkin, and A. I. Lichten- stein, “Continuous-time quantum Monte Carlo method for fermions,” Phys. Rev. B72, 035122 (2005)

    2005

  55. [55]

    Continuous-Time Solver for Quantum Im- purity Models,

    P. Werner, A. Comanac, L. de’ Medici, M. Troyer, and A. J. Millis, “Continuous-Time Solver for Quantum Im- purity Models,” Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 076405 (2006)

    2006

  56. [56]

    Dynamical Screening in Correlated Electron Materials,

    Philipp Werner and Andrew J. Millis, “Dynamical Screening in Correlated Electron Materials,” Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 146401 (2010)

    2010

  57. [57]

    Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models,

    E. Gull, A. J. Millis, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, M. Troyer, and P. Werner, “Continuous-time Monte Carlo methods for quantum impurity models,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 349–404 (2011)

    2011

  58. [58]

    w2dynamics: Local one- and two-particle quan- tities from dynamical mean field theory,

    M. Wallerberger, A. Hausoel, P. Gunacker, A. Kowal- ski, N. Parragh, F. Goth, K. Held, and G. Sangio- vanni, “w2dynamics: Local one- and two-particle quan- tities from dynamical mean field theory,” Comput. Phys. Commun.235, 388–399 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    ana cont: Python package for analytic continuation,

    Josef Kaufmann and Karsten Held, “ana cont: Python package for analytic continuation,” Comput. Phys. Com- mun.282, 108519 (2023)

    2023

  60. [60]

    See Supplemental Material for the the temperature de- pendence of the flatγband, for the identification of the leading scattering momentum of magnetic fluctuations within theγband, and for the orbital and momeentum dependence of the self-energy

  61. [61]

    Superconductivity Governed by Janus- Faced Fermiology in Strained Bilayer Nickelates,

    Siheon Ryee, Niklas Witt, Giorgio Sangiovanni, and Tim O. Wehling, “Superconductivity Governed by Janus- Faced Fermiology in Strained Bilayer Nickelates,” Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236003 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    Theory of magnetic excitations in the multilayer nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7,

    Steffen B¨ otzel, Frank Lechermann, Jannik Gondolf, and Ilya M. Eremin, “Theory of magnetic excitations in the multilayer nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7,” Phys. Rev. B109, L180502 (2024)

    2024

  63. [63]

    Sun et al

    Wenjie Sun, Zhicheng Jiang, Bo Hao, Shengjun Yan, Hongyi Zhang, Maosen Wang, Yang Yang, Haoying Sun, Zhengtai Liu, Dianxiang Ji, Zhengbin Gu, Jian Zhou, Dawei Shen, Donglai Feng, and Yuefeng Nie, “Observa- tion of superconductivity-induced leading-edge gap in Sr- doped La 3Ni2O7 thin films,” Preprint arXiv:2507.07409 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Electronic structure of compressively strained thin film La 2PrNi2O7,

    Bai Yang Wang, Yong Zhong, Sebastien Abadi, Yidi Liu, Yijun Yu, Xiaoliang Zhang, Yi-Ming Wu, Ruo- han Wang, Jiarui Li, Yaoju Tarn, Eun Kyo Ko, Vivek Thampy, Makoto Hashimoto, Donghui Lu, Young S. Lee, Thomas P. Devereaux, Chunjing Jia, Harold Y. Hwang, and Zhi-Xun Shen, “Electronic structure of compressively strained thin film La 2PrNi2O7,” Preprint arXiv...

    work page arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Angle- resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconducting (La, Pr) 3Ni2O7/SrLaAlO4 heterostructures,

    Peng Li, Guangdi Zhou, Wei Lv, Yueying Li, Chang- ming Yue, Haoliang Huang, Lizhi Xu, Jianchang Shen, Yu Miao, Wenhua Song, Zihao Nie, Yaqi Chen, Heng Wang, Weiqiang Chen, Yaobo Huang, Zhen- Hua Chen, Tian Qian, Junhao Lin, Junfeng He, Yu- Jie Sun, Zhuoyu Chen, and Qi-Kun Xue, “Angle- resolved photoemission spectroscopy of superconducting (La, Pr) 3Ni2O7/...

    2025

  66. [66]

    Infrared Probe of the Electronic Structure and Charge Dynamics of Na 0.7CoO2,

    N. L. Wang, P. Zheng, D. Wu, Y. C. Ma, T. Xiang, R. Y. Jin, and D. Mandrus, “Infrared Probe of the Electronic Structure and Charge Dynamics of Na 0.7CoO2,” Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 237007 (2004)

    2004

  67. [67]

    Supplemental Material Co-operating multiorbital and nonlocal correlations in bilayer nickelate Evgeny A

    Bai Yang Wang, private communication. Supplemental Material Co-operating multiorbital and nonlocal correlations in bilayer nickelate Evgeny A. Stepanov, 1, 2 Steffen B¨ otzel,3 Ilya M. Eremin, 3 and Frank Lechermann 3 1CPHT, CNRS, ´Ecole polytechnique, Institut Polytechnique de Paris, 91120 Palaiseau, France 2Coll` ege de France, 11 place Marcelin Berthel...