pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10101 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

Recognition: no theorem link

Correlation-Driven Orbital-Selective Fermiology and Superconductivity in the Bilayer Nickelate La₃Ni₂O₇

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords bilayer nickelateLa3Ni2O7orbital selectiveFermi surface reconstructionsuperconductivityHubbard modelinterlayer pairingcorrelation effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Electronic correlations in La3Ni2O7 drive an orbital-selective Fermi surface reconstruction that shifts the dominant superconducting pairing from the d_z2 to the d_x2-y2 orbital.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Recent photoemission experiments on the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7 find that the d_z2-derived gamma band lies below the Fermi level, contrary to density-functional predictions of three Fermi surfaces. Calculations on a realistic bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model show that increasing electronic correlations progressively deplete d_z2 spectral weight, sink the gamma band, and open pseudogaps on the alpha and beta bands, leaving Fermi arcs dominated by the d_x2-y2 orbital. Large-scale simulations reveal that the leading superconducting correlations evolve in tandem with this reconstruction, switching from d_z2-dominated to d_x2-y2-dominated interlayer spin-singlet pairing that retains an s_pm symmetry. This indicates that the loss of the gamma pocket is not a barrier to superconductivity but marks a correlation-driven change in the pairing channel.

Core claim

In the bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model for La3Ni2O7, TDVP-CPT calculations on clusters up to 16 sites demonstrate that correlations cause orbital-selective reconstruction: the d_z2 gamma band sinks below the Fermi level while pseudogaps open on the remaining bands, leaving d_x2-y2-dominated Fermi arcs at strong coupling. DMRG calculations show the superconducting correlations transition from d_z2-dominated to d_x2-y2-dominated interlayer spin-singlet pairing with s_pm structure, mediated by interlayer antiferromagnetism, Hund's coupling, and inter-orbital hybridization.

What carries the argument

The bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model solved by TDVP-based cluster perturbation theory and large-scale DMRG, which tracks the correlation-induced depletion of d_z2 weight and the resulting shift in pairing orbital character.

If this is right

  • The gamma pocket disappearance accompanies but does not suppress superconductivity.
  • Superconducting pairing retains s_pm symmetry while becoming dominated by the d_x2-y2 orbital.
  • The pairing mechanism involves interlayer antiferromagnetism combined with Hund's coupling and orbital hybridization.
  • At strong coupling the low-energy spectrum consists of d_x2-y2 Fermi arcs with pseudogaps on the other bands.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar orbital-selective effects may explain Fermi surface discrepancies reported in other layered nickelates.
  • Pressure or doping experiments that tune the interlayer hybridization could test whether the pairing channel switches back to d_z2 character.
  • The robustness of superconductivity to the loss of one Fermi pocket suggests that topological changes in the Fermi surface are less critical than the underlying correlation-driven pairing glue.

Load-bearing premise

The specific hopping parameters, interaction strengths, and finite-cluster approximations in the bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model correctly represent the low-energy physics of the actual La3Ni2O7 material.

What would settle it

ARPES measurements at the superconducting doping level that directly confirm whether the gamma band remains below the Fermi level and whether the superconducting gap has dominant d_x2-y2 orbital character.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10101 by Jian-Xin Li, Shun-Li Yu, Yong-Yue Zong.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Bilayer two-orbital ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a)-(d) show the DOS calculated with parameters [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Interlayer pairing correlations Φ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent angle-resolved photoemission measurements on La$_3$Ni$_2$O$_7$ have challenged the density-functional-theory-based picture of three Fermi surfaces by revealing that the $d_{z^2}$-derived $\gamma$ band can reside below the Fermi level. Motivated by this discrepancy, we investigate a realistic bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model using time-dependent variational principle (TDVP)-based cluster perturbation theory (CPT), alongside large-scale density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations. Our TDVP-CPT calculations, performed on clusters of up to 16 physical sites, reveal that electronic correlations drive a pronounced orbital-selective reconstruction of the low-energy spectrum: the $d_{z^2}$ spectral weight is progressively depleted, the $\gamma$ band sinks below the Fermi level, and pseudogaps open on the remaining $\alpha$ and $\beta$ bands, leaving Fermi arcs dominated by the $d_{x^2-y^2}$ orbital at strong coupling. Furthermore, large-scale DMRG calculations demonstrate that the leading superconducting correlations evolve consistently with this Fermi surface reconstruction, transitioning from $d_{z^2}$-dominated to $d_{x^2-y^2}$-dominated interlayer spin-singlet pairing while retaining an $s_{\pm}$ structure. Consequently, our results indicate that the disappearance of the $\gamma$ pocket is not detrimental to superconductivity; rather, it signals a correlation-driven shift of the pairing channel mediated by interlayer antiferromagnetism, Hund's coupling, and inter-orbital hybridization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the bilayer nickelate La₃Ni₂O₇ via a realistic two-orbital Hubbard model solved with TDVP-based cluster perturbation theory (CPT) on clusters up to 16 sites and large-scale DMRG. It claims that electronic correlations produce an orbital-selective reconstruction in which d_z² spectral weight is depleted, the γ pocket sinks below the Fermi level, pseudogaps open on the α and β bands, and the dominant superconducting pairing channel shifts from d_z²- to d_x²-y²-dominated interlayer spin-singlet s± pairing. The disappearance of the γ pocket is interpreted as signaling this correlation-driven crossover mediated by interlayer antiferromagnetism, Hund’s coupling, and inter-orbital hybridization, rather than suppressing superconductivity.

Significance. If the numerical findings are robust, the work supplies a concrete correlation-based mechanism that reconciles the DFT-predicted three-pocket Fermi surface with ARPES observations of a submerged γ band in La₃Ni₂O₇ and ties the reconstructed fermiology directly to the evolution of the pairing symmetry. It highlights orbital selectivity as a key ingredient in nickelate superconductivity and offers falsifiable predictions for how the pairing channel responds to doping or pressure.

major comments (3)
  1. [TDVP-CPT calculations] TDVP-CPT calculations on clusters of up to 16 physical sites: the reported depletion of d_z² weight and sinking of the γ band below E_F rely on perturbative embedding whose accuracy for Fermi-arc formation and pseudogap opening has not been demonstrated by explicit cluster-size convergence or comparison with larger embeddings; without such tests the orbital-selective reconstruction central to the pairing-channel claim remains vulnerable to finite-size artifacts.
  2. [DMRG calculations] Large-scale DMRG calculations of pairing correlations: the transition to d_x²-y²-dominated interlayer s± pairing is asserted on finite cylinders or ladders, yet no explicit finite-size scaling analysis or extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit is provided; if the dominance reverses or weakens upon extrapolation, the claimed mediation by interlayer AFM, Hund’s coupling, and hybridization does not follow.
  3. [Model and parameters] Choice of Hubbard U, Hund’s J, and hopping parameters: the orbital-selective reconstruction and pairing crossover are shown for a specific parameter set, but no systematic sensitivity study is reported; if modest variations in U/J or inter-orbital hybridization restore the γ pocket or alter the dominant pairing channel, the interpretation that the γ-pocket disappearance signals a robust correlation-driven shift is undermined.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The abstract and main text refer to “large-scale DMRG” and “clusters of up to 16 sites” without stating the precise cylinder widths, bond dimensions, or truncation errors; these numerical details should be supplied in the methods section for reproducibility.
  2. [Introduction] Band labels α, β, and γ are used throughout but are not explicitly defined with reference to the orbital character or DFT bands in the introduction; a brief clarifying sentence or figure would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We have carefully considered each major comment and provide our responses below. Where appropriate, we have revised the manuscript to address the concerns raised.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [TDVP-CPT calculations] TDVP-CPT calculations on clusters of up to 16 physical sites: the reported depletion of d_z² weight and sinking of the γ band below E_F rely on perturbative embedding whose accuracy for Fermi-arc formation and pseudogap opening has not been demonstrated by explicit cluster-size convergence or comparison with larger embeddings; without such tests the orbital-selective reconstruction central to the pairing-channel claim remains vulnerable to finite-size artifacts.

    Authors: We appreciate this comment. Our TDVP-CPT calculations were performed on clusters of 8 and 16 sites, and the key features, including the depletion of d_z² spectral weight and the sinking of the γ band, are consistent across these sizes. To demonstrate this explicitly, we will include in the revised manuscript a supplementary figure comparing the spectral functions for different cluster sizes. Additionally, we note that the DMRG calculations on larger systems support the same orbital-selective reconstruction, mitigating concerns about finite-size artifacts in the CPT approach. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [DMRG calculations] Large-scale DMRG calculations of pairing correlations: the transition to d_x²-y²-dominated interlayer s± pairing is asserted on finite cylinders or ladders, yet no explicit finite-size scaling analysis or extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit is provided; if the dominance reverses or weakens upon extrapolation, the claimed mediation by interlayer AFM, Hund’s coupling, and hybridization does not follow.

    Authors: We agree that finite-size scaling is important for DMRG results. Our calculations were performed on cylinders of lengths up to 32 sites with widths of 4 and 6, and the dominance of the d_x²-y² pairing channel remains stable with increasing length. In the revision, we will add a finite-size scaling analysis in the supplementary material, plotting the pairing correlation strengths as a function of system size to show the extrapolation trend. This supports that the transition is not an artifact of finite size. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Model and parameters] Choice of Hubbard U, Hund’s J, and hopping parameters: the orbital-selective reconstruction and pairing crossover are shown for a specific parameter set, but no systematic sensitivity study is reported; if modest variations in U/J or inter-orbital hybridization restore the γ pocket or alter the dominant pairing channel, the interpretation that the γ-pocket disappearance signals a robust correlation-driven shift is undermined.

    Authors: The parameters in our model are derived from first-principles DFT calculations and are standard for this material. We have performed additional checks varying U by ±20% and J within reasonable ranges, finding that the qualitative orbital-selective behavior and pairing crossover persist. To address the referee's concern, we will include a new section or supplementary note discussing the sensitivity to these parameters, with examples showing robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results follow from direct numerical solution of the Hubbard model

full rationale

The paper motivates its study from ARPES data showing the gamma band below EF, then solves a bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model via TDVP-CPT (up to 16-site clusters) and large-scale DMRG to compute the orbital-selective spectral reconstruction and the evolution of superconducting correlations. The claimed shift from d_z2- to d_x2-y2-dominated interlayer s± pairing is an output of these calculations, not a quantity defined in terms of itself or obtained by fitting a parameter to the target observable and relabeling it a prediction. No self-definitional steps, fitted-input-as-prediction, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain; the model parameters are presented as realistic inputs chosen to represent the material, and the results are independent computational consequences.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 3 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that the two-orbital Hubbard model with realistic parameters captures La3Ni2O7 physics, plus standard numerical approximations for finite clusters; no new entities are introduced and free parameters are the usual interaction strengths chosen for the strong-coupling regime.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard U and Hund's J
    Interaction strengths set to strong-coupling values for the nickelate; specific numbers not stated in abstract.
  • Hopping amplitudes
    Realistic bilayer hoppings taken from prior literature or DFT to define the non-interacting band structure.
axioms (3)
  • domain assumption The bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model captures the essential low-energy physics of La3Ni2O7
    Invoked as the microscopic starting point for all calculations.
  • domain assumption TDVP-CPT on clusters of up to 16 sites approximates the infinite-system spectral functions
    Basis for the reported fermiology and pseudogap results.
  • domain assumption Large-scale DMRG captures the leading superconducting correlations in the thermodynamic limit
    Used to track the evolution of pairing channels.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1619 out tokens · 58290 ms · 2026-05-12T03:02:33.812508+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    H. Sun, M. Huo, X. Hu, J. Li, Z. Liu, Y. Han, L. Tang, Z. Mao, P. Yang, B. Wang, J. Cheng, D.-X. Yao, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Wang, Signatures of superconductivity near 80 K in a nickelate under high pressure, Nature621, 493 (2023)

  2. [2]

    Zhang, D

    Y. Zhang, D. Su, Y. Huang, Z. Shan, H. Sun, M. Huo, K. Ye, J. Zhang, Z. Yang, Y. Xu, Y. Su, R. Li, M. Smid- man, M. Wang, L. Jiao, and H. Yuan, High-temperature superconductivity with zero resistance and strange-metal behaviour in La 3Ni2O7-δ, Nature Physics20, 1269 (2024)

  3. [3]

    G. Wang, N. N. Wang, X. L. Shen, J. Hou, L. Ma, L. F. Shi, Z. A. Ren, Y. D. Gu, H. M. Ma, P. T. Yang, Z. Y. Liu, H. Z. Guo, J. P. Sun, G. M. Zhang, S. Calder, J.-Q. Yan, B. S. Wang, Y. Uwatoko, and J.-G. Cheng, Pressure-Induced Superconductivity In Polycrys- talline La3Ni2O7−δ, Phys. Rev. X14, 011040 (2024)

  4. [4]

    Z. Luo, X. Hu, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, Bilayer Two-Orbital Model of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 126001 (2023)

  5. [5]

    Christiansson, F

    V. Christiansson, F. Petocchi, and P. Werner, Correlated Electronic Structure of La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 206501 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Elec- tronic structure, dimer physics, orbital-selective behav- ior, and magnetic tendencies in the bilayer nickelate su- perconductor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B 108, L180510 (2023)

  7. [7]

    Y. Wang, K. Jiang, Z. Wang, F.-C. Zhang, and J. Hu, Electronic and magnetic structures of bilayer La 3Ni2O7 at ambient pressure, Phys. Rev. B110, 205122 (2024). 6

  8. [8]

    Q.-G. Yang, D. Wang, and Q.-H. Wang, Possibles ±- wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, L140505 (2023)

  9. [9]

    Liu, J.-W

    Y.-B. Liu, J.-W. Mei, F. Ye, W.-Q. Chen, and F. Yang, s±-Wave Pairing and the Destructive Role of Apical- Oxygen Deficiencies in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 236002 (2023)

  10. [10]

    Y.-H. Tian, Y. Chen, J.-M. Wang, R.-Q. He, and Z.-Y. Lu, Correlation effects and concomitant two-orbitals ±- wave superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under high pressure, Phys. Rev. B109, 165154 (2024)

  11. [11]

    Zhang, L.-F

    Y. Zhang, L.-F. Lin, A. Moreo, T. A. Maier, and E. Dagotto, Structural phase transition, s±-wave pair- ing, and magnetic stripe order in bilayered superconduc- tor La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Nature Communications 15, 2470 (2024)

  12. [12]

    Zheng and W

    Y.-Y. Zheng and W. W´ u,s ±-wave superconductivity in the bilayer two-orbital Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B 111, 035108 (2025)

  13. [13]

    Y. Gu, C. Le, Z. Yang, X. Wu, and J. Hu, Effective model and pairing tendency in the bilayer Ni-based supercon- ductor La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B111, 174506 (2025)

  14. [14]

    Xi, S.-L

    W. Xi, S.-L. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Transition froms ±-wave tod x2−y2-wave superconductivity driven by interlayer in- teraction in the bilayer two-orbital model of La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B111, 104505 (2025)

  15. [15]

    C. Xia, H. Liu, S. Zhou, and H. Chen, Sensitive depen- dence of pairing symmetry on Ni-eg crystal field splitting in the nickelate superconductor La 3Ni2O7, Nature Com- munications16, 1054 (2025)

  16. [16]

    Fan, J.-F

    Z. Fan, J.-F. Zhang, B. Zhan, D. Lv, X.-Y. Jiang, B. Nor- mand, and T. Xiang, Superconductivity in nickelate and cuprate superconductors with strong bilayer coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, 024514 (2024)

  17. [17]

    Xu and D

    H.-X. Xu and D. Guterding, Incommensurate spin fluc- tuations and competing pairing symmetries in La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B112, 174519 (2025)

  18. [18]

    Jiang, Z

    K. Jiang, Z. Wang, and F.-C. Zhang, High-Temperature Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Chinese Physics Letters 41, 017402 (2024)

  19. [19]

    Qin and Y.-f

    Q. Qin and Y.-f. Yang, High-Tc superconductivity by mo- bilizing local spin singlets and possible route to higher Tc in pressurized La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, L140504 (2023)

  20. [21]

    Yang, G.-M

    Y.-f. Yang, G.-M. Zhang, and F.-C. Zhang, Interlayer valence bonds and two-component theory for high-Tc su- perconductivity of La 3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B108, L201108 (2023)

  21. [22]

    Z. Luo, B. Lv, M. Wang, W. W´ u, and D.-X. Yao, High- TC superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 based on the bilayer two-orbital t-J model, npj Quantum Materials9, 61 (2024)

  22. [23]

    Kaneko, H

    T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Pair correlations in the two-orbital Hubbard ladder: Im- plications for superconductivity in the bilayer nickelate La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B109, 045154 (2024)

  23. [24]

    Kakoi, T

    M. Kakoi, T. Kaneko, H. Sakakibara, M. Ochi, and K. Kuroki, Pair correlations of the hybridized orbitals in a ladder model for the bilayer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B109, L201124 (2024)

  24. [25]

    Y. Shen, J. Huang, X. Qian, G.-M. Zhang, and M. Qin, Numerical study of the bilayer two-orbital model for La3Ni2O7 on a plaquette ladder, Phys. Rev. B111, L180508 (2025)

  25. [26]

    Oh and Y.-H

    H. Oh and Y.-H. Zhang, Type-IIt−Jmodel and shared superexchange coupling from Hund’s rule in supercon- ducting La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B108, 174511 (2023)

  26. [27]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interplay of two Eg orbitals in superconducting La3Ni2O7 under pressure, Phys. Rev. B110, 094509 (2024)

  27. [28]

    C. Lu, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Interlayer- Coupling-Driven High-Temperature Superconductivity in La 3Ni2O7 under Pressure, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 146002 (2024)

  28. [29]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, J. Chen, C. Wu, F. Yang, W. Li, and G. Su, Bilayert−J−J ⊥ Model and Magnetically Me- diated Pairing in the Pressurized Nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 036502 (2024)

  29. [30]

    J. Chen, F. Yang, and W. Li, Orbital-selective supercon- ductivity in the pressurized bilayer nickelate La 3Ni2O7: An infinite projected entangled-pair state study, Phys. Rev. B110, L041111 (2024)

  30. [31]

    Qu, D.-W

    X.-Z. Qu, D.-W. Qu, X.-W. Yi, W. Li, and G. Su, Hund’s rule, interorbital hybridization, and high-T c supercon- ductivity in the bilayer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B112, L161101 (2025)

  31. [32]

    J. Shen, G. Zhou, Y. Miao, P. Li, Z. Ou, Y. Chen, Z. Wang, R. Luan, H. Sun, Z. Feng, X. Yong, Y. Li, L. Xu, W. Lv, Z. Nie, H. Wang, H. Huang, Y.-J. Sun, Q.-K. Xue, J. He, and Z. Chen, Nodeless superconducting gap and electron-boson coupling in (La,Pr,Sm) 3Ni2O7 films, (2025), arXiv:2502.17831 [cond-mat.supr-con]

  32. [33]

    B. Y. Wang, Y. Zhong, S. Abadi, Y. Liu, Y. Yu, X. Zhang, Y.-M. Wu, R. Wang, J. Li, Y. Tarn, E. K. Ko, V. Thampy, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Y. S. Lee, T. P. Devereaux, C. Jia, H. Y. Hwang, and Z.-X. Shen, Electronic structure of compressively strained thin film La2PrNi2O7, (2025), arXiv:2504.16372

  33. [34]

    Yue, J.-J

    C. Yue, J.-J. Miao, H. Huang, Y. Hua, P. Li, Y. Li, G. Zhou, W. Lv, Q. Yang, F. Yang, H. Sun, Y.-J. Sun, J. Lin, Q.-K. Xue, Z. Chen, and W.-Q. Chen, Correlated Electronic Structures and Unconventional Superconduc- tivity in Bilayer Nickelate Heterostructures, National Sci- ence Review12, nwaf253 (2025)

  34. [35]

    W. Sun, Z. Jiang, B. Hao, S. Yan, H. Zhang, M. Wang, Y. Yang, H. Sun, Z. Liu, D. Ji, Z. Gu, J. Zhou, D. Shen, D. Feng, and Y. Nie, Observation of superconductivity- induced leading-edge gap in Sr-doped La 3Ni2O7 thin films, (2025), arXiv:2507.07409

  35. [36]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, G. Sangiovanni, and T. O. Wehling, Su- perconductivity Governed by Janus-Faced Fermiology in Strained Bilayer Nickelates, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236003 (2025)

  36. [37]

    S. Ryee, N. Witt, and T. O. Wehling, Quenched Pair Breaking by Interlayer Correlations as a Key to Super- conductivity in La 3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 096002 (2024)

  37. [38]

    E. A. Stepanov, S. B¨ otzel, I. M. Eremin, and F. Lecher- mann, Co-operating multiorbital and nonlocal correla- tions in bilayer nickelate, (2026), arXiv:2604.08221

  38. [39]

    Z. Liao, Y. Wang, L. Chen, G. Duan, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Orbital-selective electron correlations in high-T c bilayer nickelates: from a global phase diagram to implications 7 for spectroscopy, (2024), arXiv:2412.21019

  39. [40]

    Chen, C.-Q

    W.-Y. Chen, C.-Q. Chen, M. Wang, S.-S. Gong, and D.- X. Yao, Superconductivity of bilayer two-orbital Hub- bard model for La 3Ni2O7 under high pressure, (2025), arXiv:2511.01801 [cond-mat.supr-con]

  40. [41]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-Dependent Variational Principle for Quantum Lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 070601 (2011)

  41. [42]

    Haegeman, C

    J. Haegeman, C. Lubich, I. Oseledets, B. Vandereycken, and F. Verstraete, Unifying time evolution and optimiza- tion with matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B94, 165116 (2016)

  42. [43]

    Paeckel, T

    S. Paeckel, T. K¨ ohler, A. Swoboda, S. R. Manmana, U. Schollw¨ ock, and C. Hubig, Time-Evolution Meth- ods for Matrix-Product States, Annals of Physics411, 167998 (2019)

  43. [44]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 7 (2019)

  44. [45]

    Tian and S

    Y. Tian and S. R. White, Matrix product state recur- sion methods for computing spectral functions of strongly correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. B103, 125142 (2021)

  45. [46]

    Q. Li, Y. Gao, Y.-Y. He, Y. Qi, B.-B. Chen, and W. Li, Tangent Space Approach for Thermal Tensor Network Simulations of the 2D Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 226502 (2023)

  46. [47]

    N. E. Sherman, M. Dupont, and J. E. Moore, Spectral function of theJ 1−J2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B107, 165146 (2023)

  47. [48]

    Y. Gao, C. Zhang, J. Xiang, D. Yu, X. Lu, P. Sun, W. Jin, G. Su, and W. Li, Double magnon-roton excitations in the triangular-lattice spin supersolid, Phys. Rev. B110, 214408 (2024)

  48. [49]

    Wang, Y.-M

    H.-X. Wang, Y.-M. Wu, Y.-F. Jiang, and H. Yao, Spec- tral properties of a one-dimensional extended Hubbard model from bosonization and time-dependent variational principle: Applications to one-dimensional cuprates, Phys. Rev. B109, 045102 (2024)

  49. [50]

    S´ en´ echal, D

    D. S´ en´ echal, D. Perez, and M. Pioro-Ladri` ere, Spectral Weight of the Hubbard Model through Cluster Perturba- tion Theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 522 (2000)

  50. [51]

    S´ en´ echal, D

    D. S´ en´ echal, D. Perez, and D. Plouffe, Cluster perturba- tion theory for Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B66, 075129 (2002)

  51. [52]

    S´ en´ echal and A.-M

    D. S´ en´ echal and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Hot Spots and Pseu- dogaps for Hole- and Electron-Doped High-Temperature Superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 126401 (2004)

  52. [53]

    S.-L. Yu, X. C. Xie, and J.-X. Li, Mott Physics and Topo- logical Phase Transition in Correlated Dirac Fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 010401 (2011)

  53. [54]

    Yu and J.-X

    S.-L. Yu and J.-X. Li, Chiral superconducting phase and chiral spin-density-wave phase in a Hubbard model on the kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. B85, 144402 (2012)

  54. [55]

    Kohno, Mott Transition in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys

    M. Kohno, Mott Transition in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 076401 (2012)

  55. [56]

    Z. Chen, Y. Wang, S. N. Rebec, T. Jia, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, B. Moritz, R. G. Moore, T. P. Devereaux, and Z.- X. Shen, Anomalously strong near-neighbor attraction in doped 1D cuprate chains, Science373, 1235 (2021)

  56. [57]

    Zong, Z.-L

    Y.-Y. Zong, Z.-L. Gu, and J.-X. Li, Pseudogap with Fermi Arcs and Fermi Pockets in Half-Filled Twisted Transition Metal Dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. X16, 011005 (2026)

  57. [58]

    Van Damme, L

    M. Van Damme, L. Devos, and J. Haegeman, Quan- tumKitHub/MPSKit.jl: v0.13.4 (2025)

  58. [59]

    Haegeman, L

    J. Haegeman, L. Devos, M. Hauru, M. Van Damme, and L. Burgelman, Jutho/TensorKit.jl: v0.14.9 (2025)

  59. [60]

    J. Yang, H. Sun, X. Hu, Y. Xie, T. Miao, H. Luo, H. Chen, B. Liang, W. Zhu, G. Qu, C.-Q. Chen, M. Huo, Y. Huang, S. Zhang, F. Zhang, F. Yang, Z. Wang, Q. Peng, H. Mao, G. Liu, Z. Xu, T. Qian, D.-X. Yao, M. Wang, L. Zhao, and X. J. Zhou, Orbital-dependent electron correlation in double-layer nickelate La 3Ni2O7, Nature Communications15, 4373 (2024)

  60. [61]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for detailed information on the effects of inter- orbital Coulomb repulsion on the spectral function, pair- ing correlation functions on the 2×2×24 lattice, and the charge denstiy distribution

  61. [62]

    H. Oh, B. Zhou, and Y.-H. Zhang, Type-IIt−Jmodel in charge transfer regime in bilayer La 3Ni2O7 and trilayer La4Ni3O10, Phys. Rev. B111, L020504 (2025)

  62. [63]

    Y. Shen, M. Qin, and G.-M. Zhang, Effective Bi-Layer Model Hamiltonian and Density-Matrix Renormaliza- tion Group Study for the High-Tc Superconductivity in La3Ni2O7 under High Pressure, Chinese Physics Letters 40, 127401 (2023)

  63. [64]

    Q. W. C. P. Zhu, Xiaoyu and Z. Zhang, Quantum phase transition driven by competing intralayer and interlayer hopping in bilayer nickelates, Phys. Rev. B , (2026)

  64. [65]

    J.-H. Ji, C. Lu, Z.-Y. Shao, Z. Pan, F. Yang, and C. Wu, Strong-coupling study of the pairing mechanism in pres- surized La3Ni2O7, Phys. Rev. B112, 214515 (2025)

  65. [66]

    Correlation-Driven Orbital-Selective Fermiology and Superconductivity in the Bilayer Nickelate La 3Ni2O7

    G. Khaliullin and J. c. v. Chaloupka, Orbital order and superconductivity in bilayer nickelate compounds, Phys. Rev. B113, L041115 (2026). Supplemental Material for “Correlation-Driven Orbital-Selective Fermiology and Superconductivity in the Bilayer Nickelate La 3Ni2O7” Yong-Yue Zong,1 Shun-Li Yu, 1, 2,∗ and Jian-Xin Li 1, 2, 3,† 1National Laboratory of ...