pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.09875 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

Galactic Archaeology with the Subaru `\=Onohi`ula Prime Focus Spectrograph Strategic Program

Masashi Chiba , Rosemary F. G. Wyse , Evan N. Kirby , Judith G. Cohen , L\'aszl\'o Dobos , Roman Gerasimov , Miho N. Ishigaki , Kohei Hayashi
show 41 more authors
Carrie Filion Magda Arnaboldi Souradeep Bhattacharya Yutaka Hirai Chiaki Kobayashi Yutaka Komiyama Pete B. Kuzma Itsuki Ogami Ana L. Chies-Santos Nicole L. Klock-Miranda Federico Sestito Tam\'as Budav\'ari Andrew P. Cooper Keyi Ding Ivanna Escala Elisa G. M. Ferreira Ortwin Gerhard Lauren Henderson Jihye Hong Shunichi Horigome Ryota Ikeda Ryo Ishikawa Takanobu Kirihara Zhuohan Li Nicolas Martin Rin Miyazaki Sakurako Okamoto Rohan Pattnaik Kyosuke Sato Yoshihisa Suzuki Alexander S. Szalay Dafa Wardana Viska Wei Wenbo Wu Zhenyu Wu Xinfeng Xu Xianhao Ye Yohei Miki Xiangwei Zhang Gang Zhao Jingkun Zhao Xiaosheng Zhao
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 16:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords dwarf galaxiesdark matter profilesgalactic archaeologyLocal GroupMilky Way haloM31spectroscopy
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Subaru PFS survey will model density profiles of six dwarf galaxies using 18,000 stars to test if they show cold dark matter cusps or alternative cores.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper outlines the Galactic Archaeology portion of the 360-night Subaru PFS Strategic Program, which dedicates 130 nights to Local Group studies. Its primary aim is to deduce mass density profiles as a function of radius for six dwarf galaxies by modeling full line-of-sight velocity and abundance distributions from 18,000 member stars beyond tidal radii, distinguishing cusps predicted by cold dark matter from cores expected under alternative dark matter or strong baryonic feedback. A second goal measures alpha-element abundances in 30,000 M31 halo stars to compare assembly histories with the Milky Way. The third goal traces the outer Milky Way's response to ancient and recent accretion events by providing velocities, metallicities, and photometry-derived ages for tens of thousands of main-sequence stars out to 30 kpc.

Core claim

The program will deduce the mass density profiles of six dwarf galaxies as a function of radius from modeling of the full line-of-sight velocity and abundance distributions for 18,000 member stars to beyond the nominal tidal radius of each system, testing consistency with cusps expected for cold dark matter or cores expected from alternative dark matter theories or baryonic feedback. Complementary measurements of the [alpha/Fe] ratio in 30,000 M31 halo and outer disk stars will reveal differences in assembly history with the Milky Way, while velocities and metallicities for Milky Way main-sequence stars to 30 kpc will show responses to accretion events such as Gaia-Sausage Enceladus and the,

What carries the argument

Modeling full line-of-sight velocity and abundance distributions from PFS multi-fiber spectra to derive radial mass density profiles beyond tidal radii in dwarf galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

That the planned samples of 18,000 dwarf galaxy members and 30,000 M31 halo stars will be sufficient to reliably model full line-of-sight velocity and abundance distributions beyond tidal radii without significant contamination or selection biases.

What would settle it

If the modeled central density slope for the dwarf galaxies is measured to be near -1 rather than near zero, this would favor cold dark matter cusps over cores.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.09875 by Alexander S. Szalay, Ana L. Chies-Santos, Andrew P. Cooper, Carrie Filion, Chiaki Kobayashi, Dafa Wardana, Elisa G. M. Ferreira, Evan N. Kirby, Federico Sestito, Gang Zhao, Itsuki Ogami, Ivanna Escala, Jihye Hong, Jingkun Zhao, Judith G. Cohen, Keyi Ding, Kohei Hayashi, Kyosuke Sato, L\'aszl\'o Dobos, Lauren Henderson, Magda Arnaboldi, Masashi Chiba, Miho N. Ishigaki, Nicolas Martin, Nicole L. Klock-Miranda, Ortwin Gerhard, Pete B. Kuzma, Rin Miyazaki Sakurako Okamoto, Rohan Pattnaik, Roman Gerasimov, Rosemary F. G. Wyse, Ryo Ishikawa, Ryota Ikeda, Shunichi Horigome, Souradeep Bhattacharya, Takanobu Kirihara, Tam\'as Budav\'ari, Viska Wei, Wenbo Wu, Xiangwei Zhang, Xianhao Ye, Xiaosheng Zhao, Xinfeng Xu, Yohei Miki, Yoshihisa Suzuki, Yutaka Hirai, Yutaka Komiyama, Zhenyu Wu, Zhuohan Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (Figure after J. S. Bullock & M. Boylan-Kolchin 2017, their [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) DM density profiles derived by an axisymmetric, 2nd-velocity-moment Jeans analysis. The underlying model is shown as a dashed line. The shaded bands and colored curves correspond to the recovered density profiles and uncertainties obtained using line-of-sight velocities for stars that match “Current” (N = 500, orange) and “PFS forecast” (N = 5, 000, purple) samples, distributed on the sky as shown in t… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The planned PFS pointings for the dwarf galaxies. Red hexagons indicate pointings that will be repeated to identify candidate binary systems. The blue and gray dots in each panel are member and non-member star candidates selected by HSC photometry. The solid and dashed ellipses show the core and nominal tidal radii that result from fits to King model profiles (R. R. Mu˜noz et al. 2018). S14A (PI:Chiba) & S… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The HSC color–magnitude diagrams for three dSphs in order of decreasing distance. Red points show stars that pass the narrow-band selection for giants. The approximate g magnitude limit for PFS spectroscopy is shown as a solid blue line. The approximate g magnitude at which [Fe/H] and [α/Fe] uncertainties are less than 0.15 are shown as dashed blue lines (constants in g magnitude). The limits for 3 and 5 k… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Proposed PFS pointings (gray hexagons) in M31 and M33 (inset). The color map shows the surface density of candidate member stars selected through the combination of HSC broadband (g, i) and narrowband (NB515) imaging (I. Ogami et al. 2025). We anticipate observing about 30,000 red giants in M31. Also shown are planetary nebulae (§3.2) and candidate globular clusters (§3.6). morphology of cannibalized satel… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean log(O/Ar) values of older (> 4.5 Gyr) low-extinction PNe (red) over the 2 − 30 kpc M31-galactocentric radial range, the younger (∼ 2.5 Gyr) high-extinction PNe (blue) within RM31 ≤ 14 kpc, and the two-infall fiducial chemical evolution model for the M31 disk(s), colored by predicted lookback time (see M. Arn￾aboldi et al. 2022 for details). quent or more massive mergers of luminous or dark satel￾lites… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: N-body simulation that reproduces the morphology and kinematics of the Northwestern Stream in M31 (Miki & Kirihara, private communication): (a) The projected spatial densities of simulated stellar particles, where the main stellar disk of M31 is represented by an ellipse and the five HSC pointings for the stream (Y. Komiyama et al. 2018) are shown by the circles. These fields are included in the planned PF… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: HSC color–magnitude ((g − i)0 vs. i0) and color–color ((NB515 − g)0 vs. (g − i)0) diagrams for stars in the fields of the Northwestern Stream of M31, shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Radial density profile of the HSC/NB515-selected RGB stars in the outer region of M33 (reproduced by per￾mission of the AAS from I. Ogami et al. 2024). The black dots and their error bars indicate the number density of stars in each region. The red, blue, and pink lines are the derived individual profiles for the disk, halo, and contamination com￾ponents, respectively, and the orange line shows the result … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The predicted abundance-ratio distribution of disk stars at different Galactocentric radial and height ranges, from the chemodynamical simulation model by F. Vincenzo & C. Kobayashi (2020). The color coding indicates the degree of rotation support: vrot/σ < 3 (blue), 2.5 (cyan), 2 (green), 1.5 (yellow), 1 (orange), and 0.5 (red). Merrifield & K. Kuijken 1998), as seen in N-body and cosmological numerical … view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Planned PFS outer Milky Way fields for low and high latitude regions. The low-latitude fields target the outer disk and consists of 44 contiguous pointings at l = 180◦ and l = 90◦ over 15◦ < |b| < 30◦ . The high-latitude fields target the Galactic halo and include 45 pointings over 30◦ < |b| < 60◦ , including those covering the three halo streams Triangulum–Pisces, NGC5466, and Hermus. Known member stars … view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Synthetic spectra of UCDs (Teff = 2700 K) with assumed elemental abundances characteristic of the thin disk, thick disk and the Galactic halo (J. T. Mackereth et al. 2019), shown in black, green and red respectively. Prominent molecular absorption bands and atomic lines are highlighted and labeled. Intensities have been offset for clarity, as indicated by dotted horizontal lines. Subsolar metallicity mode… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The two top panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Expected signal-to-noise per resolution element in the medium resolution red arm, for three different types of targets. Targets in the fields of dSphs will have an expo￾sure time of 3 hours, while M31 targets will be observed for 5 hours. The top two panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Panels a and b: Membership probability of stars observed in the field of the Ursa Minor dwarf galaxy based on HSC broadband and narrow-band photometry from stellar population simulations. Panel (a) shows the probabil￾ities based on broadband colors only while panel (b) is based on the broadband photometry plus the NB515 narrow-band filter. Panel c: “Ghost plot” of the observed CMD with stars randomly remo… view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: The color–magnitude (top left) and color–color (top right) diagrams, corrected for reddening and extinction, for the stars of the Ursa Minor dSph. The innermost four pointings (of the planned eight pointings) are shown. Stars with fibers assigned are shown in the right panels. Untargeted stars are shown in the middle panels. The spatial distribution of the stars is plotted in the bottom row. The bottom ri… view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Panel a: Stars observed by HSC in four fields around the center of the Ursa Minor dSph. The dashed el￾lipse marks the nominal tidal radius, while the blue hexagons indicate these inner PFS pointings. Panel b: The col￾or-magnitude diagram, corrected for reddening and extinc￾tion, of stars located outside the nominal tidal radius. Even though the sample is clearly dominated by likely foreground Milky Way ha… view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: The uncertainty of RV measurements (random errors only) as a function of S/N per resolution element, for the medium-resolution red arm (top row) and of HSC i mag￾nitude (bottom row), for three different stellar types, similar to those that the PFS/SSP will target in dSphs (texp = 3 hr) and in M31 (texp = 5 hr). The colors indicate the spectro￾graph arms included in the simulations: blue – blue arm, black … view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Expected limiting r-magnitudes for PFS mea￾surements of chemical abundances for stars with different metallicities. Limiting magnitudes are defined such that the random error in the measurement does not exceed 0.1 dex. The magnitudes were derived from simulated observations of a star with Teff = 5000 K, log(g) = 1.5, and scaled solar abundances. Nominal 3-hour exposures and the MR mode in the red arm were… view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Spectral model fit to a PFS SSP observation of a r ≈ 16.8 red giant member of Draco with estimated Teff = 4270 K and [Fe/H] = −1.7. This spectrum was obtained with 3 hours of exposure. The three panels showcase small regions of the spectra obtained with the blue (left), MR-mode red (center) and infrared (right) arms, centered around La ii λλ5302, 5304, Mg i λ8807, and Si i λλ10785, 10787, respectively. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: MCMC posterior distributions of chemical pa￾rameters inferred from simulated PFS observations of a star with Teff = 4000 K, log(g) = 1 and [Fe/H] = −1, assuming a range of apparent magnitudes as shown. The contours show 2-sigma constraints on the best-fit parameters. 8. SUMMARY The PFS/SSP GA survey, as outlined here, will sig￾nificantly improve our understanding of the formation, evolution, and structure… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The recently commissioned Subaru `\=Onohi`ula Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS) will obtain spectra from nearly 2,400 fibers that cover 1.24 square degrees. The 360 night Subaru Strategic Program for PFS is dedicating approximately one-third of its allocation (130 nights) to study the structure and evolution of galaxies in the Local Group. This Galactic Archaeological survey has three pillars. (1) We will determine whether the mass density profiles of dwarf galaxies are consistent with cusps, as expected for cold dark matter, or cores, as expected from alternative dark matter theories or baryonic feedback. We will deduce the density profiles as a function of radius from modeling of the full line-of-sight velocity and abundance distributions for six dwarf galaxies. Our total sample will consist of 18,000 member stars to beyond the nominal tidal radius of each system. (2) From measurements of the [alpha/Fe] abundance ratio, we will learn the difference in assembly history of the two most massive galaxies in the Local Group: M31 and the Milky Way. We will observe 30,000 member stars over 45 square degrees of M31's halo and outer disk. (3) We will uncover how the most fragile (outer) part of the Milky Way responded to accretion events both in the distant past (such as Gaia-Sausage Enceladus) and in more recent history (such as the Sagittarius dwarf spheroidal galaxy). To support this study, PFS will provide velocities and metallicities--from which, in combination with photometry, we will deduce ages--for tens of thousands of main-sequence stars out to a Galactocentric distance of ~30 kpc.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript outlines the design of the Galactic Archaeology component of the Subaru PFS Strategic Program, which dedicates 130 nights to Local Group studies. It presents three science pillars: (1) constraining mass density profiles in six dwarf galaxies via full line-of-sight velocity and abundance modeling of 18,000 member stars to test cuspy CDM profiles against cored alternatives or baryonic feedback; (2) comparing [alpha/Fe] ratios in 30,000 M31 halo and outer-disk stars over 45 square degrees to differentiate assembly histories from the Milky Way; (3) tracing the outer Milky Way's response to accretion events (e.g., Gaia-Sausage Enceladus, Sagittarius) using velocities, metallicities, and photometrically derived ages for tens of thousands of main-sequence stars to ~30 kpc.

Significance. If successfully executed, the program would deliver the largest homogeneous spectroscopic samples yet for Local Group archaeology, enabling statistically robust tests of dark matter density profiles and galaxy assembly timelines that are currently limited by sample size and coverage. The explicit target numbers, wide areal coverage, and use of PFS multiplex advantage constitute clear strengths for a proposal of this scope.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that ages will be 'deduced' from velocities, metallicities, and photometry lacks a brief description of the method (e.g., isochrone fitting or Bayesian age estimation) or reference to expected precision.
  2. [Science pillars description] The manuscript would benefit from a short paragraph on the adopted membership criteria and expected contamination rates for the dwarf-galaxy and M31-halo samples, as these directly affect the reliability of the density-profile and abundance analyses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The description accurately captures the three science pillars of the PFS Galactic Archaeology survey, including the target samples, areal coverage, and scientific goals for testing dark matter profiles, comparing assembly histories, and tracing Milky Way accretion responses.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal describes future observations without derivations or fits

full rationale

The manuscript is a Subaru Strategic Program proposal outlining planned PFS observations and science goals for Local Group galactic archaeology. It states prospective aims such as modeling density profiles from future samples of 18,000 dwarf galaxy stars and 30,000 M31 halo stars, but contains no equations, models, fits, predictions, or derivations that could reduce to inputs by construction. All claims are forward-looking plans contingent on data yet to be collected, with no self-citations, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems invoked as load-bearing steps. This is the expected non-finding for an observational proposal lacking executed analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract relies on standard domain assumptions in stellar dynamics and chemical tagging; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the provided text.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions in galactic dynamics and stellar spectroscopy allow reliable identification of member stars and modeling of velocity and abundance distributions from line-of-sight data.
    Invoked when stating that density profiles will be deduced from modeling of velocities and abundances for dwarf galaxies.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5866 in / 1217 out tokens · 45079 ms · 2026-05-10T16:51:28.951771+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

294 extracted references · 285 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Arimoto, N

    Aihara, H., Arimoto, N., Armstrong, R., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S4, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2018

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Aihara, H., AlSayyad, Y., Ando, M., et al. 2022, PASJ, 74, 247, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psab122

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psab122 2022

  3. [3]

    2011, in Cool Stars 16, Vol

    Allard, F., Homeier, D., & Freytag, B. 2011, in Cool Stars 16, Vol. 448, 91, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1011.5405

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1011.5405 2011

  4. [4]

    J., et al

    Alvarado, E., Gerasimov, R., Burgasser, A. J., et al. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 134, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ad4bd7

    work page doi:10.3847/2515-5172/ad4bd7 2024

  5. [5]

    C., Agnello, A., & Evans, N

    Amorisco, N. C., Agnello, A., & Evans, N. W. 2013, MNRAS, 429, L89, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/sls031

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sls031 2013

  6. [6]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Amorisco, N. C., & Evans, N. W. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 184, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19684.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19684.x 2012

  7. [7]

    2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.06781

    Ando, S., Baum, S., Boylan-Kolchin, M., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2203.06781. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.06781

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    , keywords =

    Antoja, T., Helmi, A., Romero-G´ omez, M., et al. 2018, Nature, 561, 360, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0510-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0510-7 2018

  9. [9]

    D., Venn K

    Arentsen, A., Starkenburg, E., Shetrone, M. D., et al. 2019, A&A, 621, A108, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834146

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834146 2019

  10. [10]

    Arnaboldi, M., Aguerri, J. A. L., Napolitano, N. R., et al. 2002, AJ, 123, 760, doi: 10.1086/338313

    work page doi:10.1086/338313 2002

  11. [11]

    2022, A&A, 666, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244258

    Arnaboldi, M., Bhattacharya, S., Gerhard, O., et al. 2022, A&A, 666, A109, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244258

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244258 2022

  12. [12]

    1995, ApJL, 451, L49, doi: 10.1086/309687

    Audouze, J., & Silk, J. 1995, ApJL, 451, L49, doi: 10.1086/309687

    work page doi:10.1086/309687 1995

  13. [13]

    2008, ApJL, 681, L13, doi: 10.1086/590179

    Battaglia, G., Helmi, A., Tolstoy, E., et al. 2008, ApJL, 681, L13, doi: 10.1086/590179

    work page doi:10.1086/590179 2008

  14. [14]

    A., San Roman, I., Gallart, C., Sarajedini, A., & Aparicio, A

    Beasley, M. A., San Roman, I., Gallart, C., Sarajedini, A., & Aparicio, A. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 3400, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv943

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv943 2015

  15. [15]

    , year = 2005, month = sep, volume =

    Beers, T. C., & Christlieb, N. 2005, ARA&A, 43, 531, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134057 2005

  16. [16]

    2020, ApJ, 903, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb5f4

    Belland, B., Kirby, E., Boylan-Kolchin, M., & Wheeler, C. 2020, ApJ, 903, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb5f4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb5f4 2020

  17. [17]

    Deason, A. J. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 611, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty982

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty982 2018

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Belokurov, V., Sanders, J. L., Fattahi, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 3880, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa876

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa876 2020

  19. [19]

    J., et al

    Belokurov, V., Vasiliev, E., Deason, A. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6200, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3436

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3436 2023

  20. [20]

    B., Evans, N

    Belokurov, V., Zucker, D. B., Evans, N. W., et al. 2006, ApJL, 642, L137, doi: 10.1086/504797

    work page doi:10.1086/504797 2006

  21. [21]

    , keywords =

    Bensby, T., Feltzing, S., & Lundstr¨ om, I. 2003, A&A, 410, 527, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031213

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031213 2003

  22. [22]

    J., Ferguson, A

    Bernard, E. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Schlafly, E. F., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 1759, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2134

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2134 2016

  23. [23]

    2024, A&A, 686, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348410

    Bernet, M., Ramos, P., Antoja, T., Monari, G., & Famaey, B. 2024, A&A, 686, A92, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348410

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348410 2024

  24. [24]

    Pontzen and F

    Besla, G., Kallivayalil, N., Hernquist, L., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 2109, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20466.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20466.x 2012

  25. [25]

    2025a, ApJL, 983, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc735

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Gerhard, O., Kobayashi, C., & Saha, K. 2025a, ApJL, 983, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adc735

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/adc735 2041

  26. [26]

    2021, A&A, 647, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038366

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Gerhard, O., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A130, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038366

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038366 2021

  27. [27]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 6010, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1378

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Hammer, F., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 6010, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1378

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1378 2023

  28. [28]

    2019a, A&A, 624, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834579

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Hartke, J., et al. 2019a, A&A, 624, A132, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834579

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834579

  29. [29]

    Mass-dependent chemical enrichment sequences of SDSS star-forming galaxies out to z~0.3 revealed by direct O & Ar abundances

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Kobayashi, C., Gerhard, O., & Saha, K. 2025b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.01896, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.01896

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.01896

  30. [30]

    2019b, A&A, 631, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935898

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Caldwell, N., et al. 2019b, A&A, 631, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935898

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935898

  31. [31]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 2343, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2703

    Bhattacharya, S., Arnaboldi, M., Caldwell, N., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 2343, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2703

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2703 2022

  32. [32]

    C., Loebman, S

    Bird, J. C., Loebman, S. R., Weinberg, D. H., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1815, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab289

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab289 2021

  33. [34]

    2021b, MNRAS, 504, 3168, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab704

    Bland-Hawthorn, J., & Tepper-Garc´ ıa, T. 2021b, MNRAS, 504, 3168, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab704

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab704

  34. [35]

    C., M´ esz´ aros, S., Fleming, S

    Bohlin, R. C., M´ esz´ aros, S., Fleming, S. W., et al. 2017, AJ, 153, 234, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa6ba9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa6ba9 2017

  35. [36]

    2012, ApJL, 760, L6, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/760/1/L6

    Bonaca, A., Geha, M., & Kallivayalil, N. 2012, ApJL, 760, L6, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/760/1/L6

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/760/1/l6 2012

  36. [37]

    Bonaca, A., & Hogg, D. W. 2018, ApJ, 867, 101, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da PFS-SSP GA Science39

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aae4da 2018

  37. [38]

    Bonaca, A., & Price-Whelan, A. M. 2025, New Astronomy Reviews, 100, 101713, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newar.2024.101713

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newar.2024.101713 2025

  38. [39]

    , keywords =

    Bonaca, A., Conroy, C., Cargile, P. A., et al. 2020, ApJL, 897, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9caa

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ab9caa 2020

  39. [40]

    2021, A&A, 651, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140816

    Bonifacio, P., Monaco, L., Salvadori, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140816

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140816 2021

  40. [41]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    Bosch, J., Armstrong, R., Bickerton, S., et al. 2018, PASJ, 70, S5, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx080

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx080 2018

  41. [42]

    A., & Helmi, A

    Breddels, M. A., & Helmi, A. 2014, ApJL, 791, L3, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/791/1/L3

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/791/1/l3 2014

  42. [43]

    Bromm, V., & Larson, R. B. 2004, ARA&A, 42, 79, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.42.053102.134034 2004

  43. [44]

    2024, The BONES Archive, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12668258

    Brooks, H. 2024, The BONES Archive, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12668258

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.12668258 2024

  44. [45]

    2021, MNRAS, 506, 150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1242

    Buder, S., Sharma, S., Kos, J., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 506, 150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1242

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1242 2021

  45. [46]

    , keywords =

    Bullock, J. S., & Boylan-Kolchin, M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 343, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055313 2017

  46. [47]

    S., & Johnston, K

    Bullock, J. S., & Johnston, K. V. 2005, ApJ, 635, 931, doi: 10.1086/497422

    work page doi:10.1086/497422 2005

  47. [48]

    J., Cruz, K

    Burgasser, A. J., Cruz, K. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. 2007, ApJ, 657, 494, doi: 10.1086/510148

    work page doi:10.1086/510148 2007

  48. [49]

    B., Koposov, S

    Buttry, R., Pace, A. B., Koposov, S. E., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 1706, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1441

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1441 2022

  49. [50]

    2011, Nature, 477, 67, doi: 10.1038/nature10377

    Caffau, E., Bonifacio, P., Fran¸ cois, P., et al. 2011, Nature, 477, 67, doi: 10.1038/nature10377

    work page doi:10.1038/nature10377 2011

  50. [51]

    Caldwell, N., & Romanowsky, A. J. 2016, ApJ, 824, 42, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/824/1/42

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/824/1/42 2016

  51. [52]

    2011, AJ, 141, 61, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/61

    Harding, P. 2011, AJ, 141, 61, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/61

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/141/2/61 2011

  52. [53]

    M., O’Leary, E

    Cannon, J. M., O’Leary, E. M., Weisz, D. R., et al. 2012, ApJ, 747, 122, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/122

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/747/2/122 2012

  53. [54]

    Carlberg, R. G. 2012, ApJ, 748, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/748/1/20

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/748/1/20 2012

  54. [55]

    G., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C

    Carlberg, R. G., Jenkins, A., Frenk, C. S., & Cooper, A. P. 2024, ApJ, 975, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b35

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7b35 2024

  55. [56]

    Galactic

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/376392 2003

  56. [57]

    The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.1612.05560 2016

  57. [58]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society511(1), 943–954 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac063

    Chiba, M. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 943, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac063

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac063 2022

  58. [59]

    A., Rix, H.-W., et al

    Chandra, V., Semenov, V. A., Rix, H.-W., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 112, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b60

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b60 2024

  59. [60]

    P., Conroy, C., et al

    Chandra, V., Naidu, R. P., Conroy, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 988, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addab6

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addab6 2025

  60. [61]

    J., & Necib, L

    Chang, L. J., & Necib, L. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 4715, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2440

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2440 2021

  61. [62]

    C., Ibata, R., Lewis, G

    Chapman, S. C., Ibata, R., Lewis, G. F., et al. 2006, ApJ, 653, 255, doi: 10.1086/508599

    work page doi:10.1086/508599 2006

  62. [63]

    Q., Liu, X

    Chen, B. Q., Liu, X. W., Xiang, M. S., et al. 2015, VizieR Online Data Catalog (other), 0400, J/other/RAA/15

    2015

  63. [64]

    2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1392, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/020

    Chen, B.-Q., Liu, X.-W., Xiang, M.-S., et al. 2015, Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 15, 1392, doi: 10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/020

    work page doi:10.1088/1674-4527/15/8/020 2015

  64. [65]

    Q., Zhao, G., & Zhao, J

    Chen, Y. Q., Zhao, G., & Zhao, J. K. 2009, ApJ, 702, 1336, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/702/2/1336

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/702/2/1336 2009

  65. [66]

    2001, ApJ, 554, 1044, doi: 10.1086/321427

    Chiappini, C., Matteucci, F., & Romano, D. 2001, ApJ, 554, 1044, doi: 10.1086/321427

    work page doi:10.1086/321427 2001

  66. [67]

    Chiba, M., & Beers, T. C. 2000, AJ, 119, 2843, doi: 10.1086/301409

    work page doi:10.1086/301409 2000

  67. [68]

    K., et al

    Chiti, A., Frebel, A., Mardini, M. K., et al. 2021, ApJS, 254, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abf73d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/abf73d 2021

  68. [69]

    2008, A&A, 484, 721, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078748 Ciuc˘ a, I., Kawata, D., Miglio, A., Davies, G

    Christlieb, N., Sch¨ orck, T., Frebel, A., et al. 2008, A&A, 484, 721, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20078748 Ciuc˘ a, I., Kawata, D., Miglio, A., Davies, G. R., & Grand, R. J. J. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 2814, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab639

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078748 2008

  69. [70]

    R., McMonigal, B., Bate, N

    Conn, A. R., McMonigal, B., Bate, N. F., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3282, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw513

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw513 2016

  70. [71]

    arXiv:2204.02989

    Conroy, C., Weinberg, D. H., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2204.02989, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2204.02989

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.02989 2022

  71. [72]

    2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 408, 1181, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17197.x

    Cooper, A. P., Cole, S., Frenk, C. S., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 406, 744, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16740.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16740.x 2010

  72. [73]

    P., Koposov, S

    Cooper, A. P., Koposov, S. E., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2023, ApJ, 947, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c0 Correa Magnus, L., & Vasiliev, E. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 2610, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3726 Da Costa, G. S., Bessell, M. S., Mackey, A. D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 5900, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2550 de Blok, W. J. G., McGaugh, S. S., Bosma, A., & Rubin, V....

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3c0 2023

  73. [75]

    Shen, K. J. 2020b, ApJ, 891, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab736f De Silva, G. M., Freeman, K. C., Bland-Hawthorn, J., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 2604, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv327 40PFS-SSP GA Working group

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab736f 2015

  74. [76]

    2014, ApJ, 794, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/115

    Deason, A., Wetzel, A., & Garrison-Kimmel, S. 2014, ApJ, 794, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/794/2/115

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/794/2/115 2014

  75. [77]

    J., Belokurov, V., Koposov, S

    Deason, A. J., Belokurov, V., Koposov, S. E., & Lancaster, L. 2018, ApJL, 862, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aad0ee

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aad0ee 2018

  76. [78]

    J., Fattahi, A., Frenk, C

    Deason, A. J., Fattahi, A., Frenk, C. S., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 3929, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1711

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa1711 2020

  77. [79]

    R., Koposov, S

    Dey, A., Najita, J. R., Koposov, S. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 1, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca5f8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aca5f8 2023

  78. [80]

    D., & Bekki, K

    Diaz, J. D., & Bekki, K. 2012, ApJ, 750, 36, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/750/1/36

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/750/1/36 2012

  79. [81]

    S., et al

    Ding, J., Rockosi, C., Li, T. S., et al. 2025, ApJ, 994, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a37

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae0a37 2025

  80. [82]

    Ding, K., Filion, C., Wyse, R. F. G., et al. 2025, AJ, 170, 327, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ae10a7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ae10a7 2025

Showing first 80 references.