arxiv: 2604.12259 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 💻 cs.DC · cs.OS

Recognition: unknown

A Periodic Space of Distributed Computing: Vision & Framework

Mohsen Amini Salehi , Adel N. Tousi , Hai Duc Nguyen , Murtaza Rangwala , Omar Rana , Tevfik Kosar , Valeria Cardellini , Rajkumar Buyya

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.DC cs.OS

keywords distributed computingperiodic frameworksystem propertiesresponsivenessavailabilityfuture trajectoriesdesign principlesintelligent systems

0 comments

The pith

A periodic framework modeled on chemistry's table organizes distributed computing solutions to reveal patterns in their properties and predict trajectories.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a periodic framework for the distributed computing landscape, modeled directly on the structure of the chemistry periodic table. This framework gives a systematic way to describe, compare, and reason about the behaviors and design choices of different solutions. A reader would care because the field now underpins global infrastructure for intelligent systems, and scattered solutions make it hard to see relationships or plan ahead. The authors demonstrate that the framework surfaces patterns in properties such as responsiveness and availability and supports forecasting of future directions. They also compile expert views on the properties and principles needed for emerging areas.

Core claim

We propose a periodic framework for characterizing the distributed computing landscape, inspired by the systematic structure and explanatory power of the periodic table in chemistry. This framework provides a structured way to describe, compare, and reason about the behaviors and design choices of different distributed computing solutions. Using this framework, we can identify patterns in key system properties, such as responsiveness and availability, across the distributed computing landscape. We also explain how the framework can help in predicting future trajectories in the field.

What carries the argument

The periodic framework, a structured arrangement of distributed computing solutions that mirrors the periodic table to expose relationships among their properties and design choices.

If this is right

Distributed computing solutions become comparable through a shared set of positions and properties.
Patterns appear in system behaviors such as responsiveness and availability.
Future trajectories of the field can be anticipated from the arrangement of existing solutions.
Design principles for emerging intelligent-system applications can be synthesized from the framework's structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The framework could be used to spot gaps where no current solution occupies a particular combination of properties, guiding targeted development.
It offers a consistent basis for evaluating whether a new system fills an anticipated position or duplicates an existing one.
Over time the same structure might be tested against real-world performance data to check whether the identified patterns hold as systems evolve.

Load-bearing premise

That placing distributed computing solutions into this periodic structure will reliably expose consistent patterns in their properties and support accurate predictions of future developments.

What would settle it

Mapping a broad set of existing distributed systems onto the proposed periodic framework and observing no repeatable patterns in properties such as responsiveness or availability, or finding that forecasts derived from the framework diverge from actual later developments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12259 by Adel N. Tousi, Hai Duc Nguyen, Mohsen Amini Salehi, Murtaza Rangwala, Omar Rana, Rajkumar Buyya, Tevfik Kosar, Valeria Cardellini.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: System properties across computing tiers (left to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Advances in networking and computing technologies throughout the early decades of the 21st century have transformed long-standing dreams of pervasive communication and computation into reality. These technologies now form a rapidly evolving and increasingly complex global infrastructure that will underpin the next aspiration of computing: supporting intelligent systems with human-level or even superhuman capabilities. We examine how today's distributed computing landscape can evolve to meet the demands of future users, intelligent systems, and emerging application domains. We propose a "periodic framework" for characterizing the distributed computing landscape, inspired by the systematic structure and explanatory power of the "periodic table" in chemistry. This framework provides a structured way to describe, compare, and reason about the behaviors and design choices of different distributed computing solutions. Using this framework, we can identify patterns in key system properties, such as responsiveness and availability, across the distributed computing landscape. We also explain how the framework can help in predicting future trajectories in the field. Lastly, we synthesize insights from leading researchers worldwide regarding the desired properties, design principles, and implications of emerging areas in the forthcoming distributed computing landscape and in relation to the periodic framework. Together, these perspectives shed light on the considerations that will shape the distributed computing landscape underpinning future intelligent systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A vision paper sketching a periodic-table analogy for distributed computing without any concrete mappings, dimensions, or tests to back the claims.

read the letter

This paper is a position piece that applies the periodic table analogy to distributed computing as a way to organize the field, compare systems, and forecast trajectories for intelligent applications. The specific framing is new in this domain, though the underlying idea of a systematic classification table is borrowed from chemistry. What the authors do reasonably well is collect and synthesize views from a range of researchers on desired properties, design principles, and implications for future distributed systems supporting human-level intelligence. That part gives a useful snapshot of expert thinking on where the infrastructure needs to head next. The rest of the contribution stays at the level of proposal. The framework is described in general terms as providing structure for describing behaviors and design choices, but the text supplies no explicit axes or dimensions for the periodic space, no assignment of even a few real systems such as Paxos, Chord, or Kubernetes to positions within it, and no worked example showing how periodicity would emerge or how a pattern in responsiveness would be spotted. Without those steps the assertions about identifying non-obvious patterns and predicting future trajectories remain unsupported. The risk of circularity is present: the structure is introduced by the authors and then used to characterize the very properties it is meant to reveal. This kind of work is aimed at readers who follow high-level research agendas or funding directions in distributed systems rather than those seeking new theorems, measurements, or immediately usable tools. It engages the literature in a straightforward way but does not advance it with verifiable content. I would not bring it to a technical reading group and would not cite it for any specific result. It does not seem ready for peer review as a research paper; a workshop position statement or editorial format would fit better.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a 'periodic framework' for distributed computing, modeled on the periodic table of elements, as a structured way to describe, compare, and reason about design choices and behaviors of distributed systems. It claims this framework enables identification of patterns in properties such as responsiveness and availability, supports prediction of future trajectories in the field, and incorporates synthesized insights from leading researchers on desired properties and implications for emerging areas supporting intelligent systems.

Significance. If the framework could be made operational with explicit, reusable dimensions and validated mappings, it might offer a novel organizing lens for the distributed computing landscape and aid in reasoning about trade-offs; however, the manuscript presents only a high-level vision without demonstrated mappings or predictive power, limiting its immediate impact beyond a position paper.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract and framework proposal: the central claim that the periodic space 'can identify patterns in key system properties, such as responsiveness and availability' and 'help in predicting future trajectories' lacks any operational definition of the periodic dimensions (analogous to atomic number or valence), any concrete assignment of even a small set of existing systems (Paxos, Chord, Kubernetes, etc.) to positions, or a derivation showing why the chosen axes produce periodicity rather than an arbitrary taxonomy. This makes the utility unassessable and renders the structure circular by construction.
[Framework proposal] Framework description: without an explicit mapping procedure or example instantiations that could be independently verified, the assertion that the framework provides a 'structured way to describe, compare, and reason about' solutions cannot be evaluated for reproducibility or falsifiability, which is load-bearing for the paper's vision.

minor comments (2)

[Synthesis section] The synthesis of researcher insights is presented without clear attribution or methodological detail on how the perspectives were collected and integrated with the periodic framework.
[Throughout] Notation for the periodic dimensions and properties (e.g., responsiveness, availability) should be formalized with consistent symbols or tables to improve clarity for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive critique of our vision paper. We agree that the current manuscript presents the periodic framework at a conceptual level without concrete mappings or an explicit procedure, which limits immediate evaluation of its operational utility. Below we respond point-by-point to the major comments and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and framework proposal: the central claim that the periodic space 'can identify patterns in key system properties, such as responsiveness and availability' and 'help in predicting future trajectories' lacks any operational definition of the periodic dimensions (analogous to atomic number or valence), any concrete assignment of even a small set of existing systems (Paxos, Chord, Kubernetes, etc.) to positions, or a derivation showing why the chosen axes produce periodicity rather than an arbitrary taxonomy. This makes the utility unassessable and renders the structure circular by construction.

Authors: The referee is correct that the manuscript contains no concrete system-to-position assignments and no step-by-step derivation of why the chosen axes yield periodicity. The paper is explicitly framed as a vision that synthesizes recurring design patterns observed across the literature (e.g., consistency-availability trade-offs that recur at different scales of distribution). The dimensions are drawn from established properties (consistency models, latency bounds, fault-tolerance thresholds) rather than being defined circularly by the systems themselves. Nevertheless, the absence of even a small set of worked examples does render the claimed utility difficult to assess. We will therefore add a new subsection that (1) states the mapping procedure in operational terms, (2) assigns a representative set of systems (Paxos, Raft, Chord, Kubernetes, and two edge-computing platforms) to positions in the space, and (3) shows how periodicity appears in the resulting arrangement. This addition will also illustrate how gaps in the space can be used to reason about future trajectories. revision: yes
Referee: [Framework proposal] Framework description: without an explicit mapping procedure or example instantiations that could be independently verified, the assertion that the framework provides a 'structured way to describe, compare, and reason about' solutions cannot be evaluated for reproducibility or falsifiability, which is load-bearing for the paper's vision.

Authors: We accept that the current high-level description does not supply a reproducible mapping procedure or verifiable instantiations. The framework section currently relies on qualitative synthesis of properties and researcher insights rather than a falsifiable procedure. To address this, the revised manuscript will include an explicit, step-by-step mapping protocol (property extraction, normalization to periodic axes, placement rule) together with the example instantiations noted above. These additions will allow independent verification while preserving the visionary character of the work. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in the proposed framework

full rationale

The paper is a vision and framework proposal that introduces a 'periodic framework' as an organizing analogy inspired by chemistry, then describes its prospective uses for characterizing systems and discussing future trajectories. No derivation chain, equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are presented that reduce by construction to the framework's own inputs or definitions. The claims about identifying patterns (e.g., in responsiveness) and aiding predictions are forward-looking applications of the newly defined structure rather than self-referential results. No self-citations are load-bearing for any central premise, and the work remains self-contained as a definitional proposal without tautological reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that distributed computing solutions exhibit periodic-like structure in their properties; this is introduced without derivation from prior literature or data. No free parameters are specified in the abstract. The periodic framework itself is an invented organizing entity whose validity is not independently evidenced.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Distributed computing solutions can be meaningfully arranged in a periodic space based on properties such as responsiveness and availability, analogous to the chemical periodic table.
Invoked in the abstract as the foundation for describing, comparing, and predicting system behaviors.

invented entities (1)

Periodic framework (periodic space) for distributed computing no independent evidence
purpose: To provide a structured way to describe, compare, reason about, and predict behaviors of distributed computing solutions.
Newly proposed organizing structure; the abstract supplies no falsifiable predictions or external validation for its mappings.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1370 out tokens · 72312 ms · 2026-05-10T15:52:38.362117+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

Low-earth orbit satellite constella- tions for global communication network connectivity,

E. Lagunas, S. Chatzinotas, and B. Ottersten, “Low-earth orbit satellite constella- tions for global communication network connectivity, ”Nature Reviews Electrical Engineering, vol. 1, no. 10, pp. 656–665, 2024

2024
[2]

Network characteristics of leo satellite constellations: A starlink-based measurement from end users,

S. Ma, Y. C. Chou, H. Zhao, L. Chen, X. Ma, and J. Liu, “Network characteristics of leo satellite constellations: A starlink-based measurement from end users, ” in IEEE INFOCOM 2023-IEEE Conference on Computer Communications. IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–10

2023
[3]

A view of cloud computing,

M. Armbrust, A. Fox, R. Griffith, A. D. Joseph, R. Katz, A. Konwinski, G. Lee, D. Pat- terson, A. Rabkin, I. Stoicaet al., “A view of cloud computing, ”Communications of the ACM, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 50–58, 2010

2010
[4]

The internet of things: A survey,

L. Atzori, A. Iera, and G. Morabito, “The internet of things: A survey, ”Computer networks, vol. 54, no. 15, pp. 2787–2805, 2010

2010
[5]

The computing landscape of the 21st century,

M. Satyanarayanan, W. Gao, and B. Lucia, “The computing landscape of the 21st century, ” inProceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, ser. HotMobile ’19, 2019, p. 45–50

2019
[6]

UMS: Live migration of containerized ser- vices across autonomous computing systems,

T. Chanikaphon and M. A. Salehi, “UMS: Live migration of containerized ser- vices across autonomous computing systems, ” inProceedings of the IEEE Global Communications Conference, 2023, pp. 467–472

2023
[7]

FastMig: Leveraging FastFreeze to Establish Robust Service Liquidity in Cloud 2.0,

S. Manatura, T. Chanikaphon, C. Chantrapornchai, and M. Amini Salehi, “FastMig: Leveraging FastFreeze to Establish Robust Service Liquidity in Cloud 2.0, ” in Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, ser. CLOUD ’24, 2024, pp. 81–90

2024
[8]

IntentContinuum: Using LLMs to support intent-based computing across the compute continuum,

N. Akbari, J. Grundy, A. Cheema, and A. N. Toosi, “IntentContinuum: Using LLMs to support intent-based computing across the compute continuum, ” in Proceedings of the 2025 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, ser. ICWS ’25, 2025, pp. 573–583

2025
[9]

National strategy for critical and emerging technologies,

The White House, “National strategy for critical and emerging technologies, ” Executive Office of the President, Washington, DC, Tech. Rep., Oct. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/wp-content/uploads/ 2020/10/National-Strategy-for-CET.pdf

2020
[10]

Shaping Europe’s digital future,

European Commission, “Shaping Europe’s digital future, ” European Commission, Brussels, Tech. Rep. COM(2020) 67 final, Feb. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0067

2020
[11]

Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey,

S. Duan, D. Wang, J. Ren, F. Lyu, Y. Zhang, H. Wu, and X. Shen, “Distributed artificial intelligence empowered by end-edge-cloud computing: A survey, ”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 591–624, 2022

2022
[12]

On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models

R. Bommasani, D. A. Hudson, E. Adeli, R. Altman, S. Arora, S. von Arx, M. S. Bernstein, J. Bohg, A. Bosselut, E. Brunskillet al., “On the opportunities and risks of foundation models, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258, 2022

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022
[13]

The end of Moore’s law: A new beginning for information technology,

T. N. Theis and H.-S. P. Wong, “The end of Moore’s law: A new beginning for information technology, ”Computing in Science & Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 41–50, 2017

2017
[14]

The decline of computers as a general purpose technology,

N. C. Thompson and S. Spanuth, “The decline of computers as a general purpose technology, ”Communications of the ACM, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 64–72, 2021

2021
[15]

Digital economy report 2019: Value creation and capture: Implications for developing countries,

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, “Digital economy report 2019: Value creation and capture: Implications for developing countries, ” United Nations, Geneva, Tech. Rep., 2019. [Online]. Available: https://unctad.org/publication/digital-economy-report-2019

2019
[16]

Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016

World Bank,World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington, DC: World Bank, 2016

2016
[17]

The cloud next door: Investigating the environmental and socioeconomic strain of datacenters on local communities,

W. M. Ngata, N. Bashir, M. Westerlaken, L. Liote, Y. Chandio, and E. Olivetti, “The cloud next door: Investigating the environmental and socioeconomic strain of datacenters on local communities, ” inProceedings of the ACM SIGCAS/SIGCHI Conference on Computing and Sustainable Societies, ser. COMPASS ’25, 2025, p. 769–774

2025
[18]

Review ofThe Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance,

D. V. Black, “Review ofThe Periodic Table: Its Story and Its Significance, ”Technology and Culture, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 287–289, 2010

2010
[19]

Deepmon: Mobile gpu-based deep learning framework for continuous vision applications,

L. N. Huynh, Y. Lee, and R. K. Balan, “Deepmon: Mobile gpu-based deep learning framework for continuous vision applications, ” inProceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services, 2017, pp. 82–95

2017
[20]

Watchhar: Real-time on-device human activity recognition system for smartwatches,

T. Yeon, V. Xu, H. Hoffmann, and K. Ahuja, “Watchhar: Real-time on-device human activity recognition system for smartwatches, ” inProceedings of the 27th International Conference on Multimodal Interaction, 2025, pp. 387–394

2025
[21]

Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future,

G. Nain, K. Pattanaik, and G. Sharma, “Towards edge computing in intelligent manufacturing: Past, present and future, ”Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 62, pp. 588–611, 2022

2022
[22]

Towards mobile AI that is accurate and fast,

M. Satyanarayanan, Q. Dong, J. Xu, and P. Pillai, “Towards mobile AI that is accurate and fast, ” inProceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Cognitive Machine Intelligence, ser. COGMI ’25, Nov. 2025

2025
[23]

HEET: A performance measure to quantify heterogeneity in distributed computing systems,

A. Mokhtari, S. Ghafouri, P. Jamshidi, and M. A. Salehi, “HEET: A performance measure to quantify heterogeneity in distributed computing systems, ” inPro- ceedings of the 17th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing, ser. UCC ’24, 2024, pp. 17–26

2024
[24]

Latency comparison of cloud datacen- ters and edge servers,

B. Charyyev, E. Arslan, and M. H. Gunes, “Latency comparison of cloud datacen- ters and edge servers, ” inProceedings of the 2020 IEEE Global Communications Conference, ser. GLOBECOM ’20. IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

2020
[25]

FELARE: Fair schedul- ing of machine learning tasks on heterogeneous edge systems,

A. Mokhtari, M. A. Hossen, P. Jamshidi, and M. A. Salehi, “FELARE: Fair schedul- ing of machine learning tasks on heterogeneous edge systems, ” inProceedings of the 15th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, ser. CLOUD ’22, 2022, pp. 459–468

2022
[26]

From cloud computing to sky computing,

I. Stoica and S. Shenker, “From cloud computing to sky computing, ” inProceedings of the Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems, ser. HotOS ’21, 2021, p. 26–32

2021
[27]

Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey,

J. Liu, Y. Shi, Z. M. Fadlullah, and N. Kato, “Space-air-ground integrated network: A survey, ”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 2714–2741, 2018

2018
[28]

Orbital edge computing: Nanosatellite constellations as a new class of computer system,

B. Denby and B. Lucia, “Orbital edge computing: Nanosatellite constellations as a new class of computer system, ” inProceedings of the 25th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, ser. ASPLOS ’20, 2020, pp. 939–954

2020
[29]

Raspberry Pi,

Raspberry Pi, “Raspberry Pi, ” 2026, accessed: 2026-02-12. [Online]. Available: https://www.raspberrypi.com/

2026
[30]

Jetson Nano developer kit,

NVIDIA Corporation, “Jetson Nano developer kit, ” 2026, accessed: 2026-02-12. [Online]. Available: https://developer.nvidia.com/embedded/jetson-nano

2026
[31]

Research on we- bassembly runtimes: A survey,

Y. Zhang, M. Liu, H. Wang, Y. Ma, G. Huang, and X. Liu, “Research on we- bassembly runtimes: A survey, ”ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1–47, 2025

2025
[32]

Webassembly as a common layer for the cloud-edge continuum,

J. Ménétrey, M. Pasin, P. Felber, and V. Schiavoni, “Webassembly as a common layer for the cloud-edge continuum, ” inProceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Flexible Resource and Application Management on the Edge (FRAME ’22), 2022, p. 3–8

2022
[33]

Cloud programming sim- plified: A Berkeley view on serverless computing,

E. Jonas, J. Schleier-Smith, V. Sreekanti, C.-C. Tsai, A. Khandelwal, Q. Pu, V. Shankar, J. Carreira, K. Krauth, N. Yadwadkaret al., “Cloud programming sim- plified: A Berkeley view on serverless computing, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03383, 2019

work page arXiv 1902
[34]

Morris,Infrastructure as Code: Designing and Delivering Dynamic Systems for the Cloud Age, 3rd ed

K. Morris,Infrastructure as Code: Designing and Delivering Dynamic Systems for the Cloud Age, 3rd ed. O’Reilly Media, 2025

2025
[35]

(2026) Knative official website

Knative Authors. (2026) Knative official website. [Online]. Available: https: //knative.dev/

2026
[36]

(2026) AWS Step Functions

Amazon Web Services, Inc. (2026) AWS Step Functions. [Online]. Available: https://aws.amazon.com/step-functions/

2026
[37]

Efficient performance guarantees for function-as- a-service with cloud allocators,

H. D. Nguyen and A. A. Chien, “Efficient performance guarantees for function-as- a-service with cloud allocators, ” inProceedings of the 26th International Middleware Conference, ser. Middleware ’25, 2025, p. 99–113

2025
[38]

Real-time serverless: En- abling application performance guarantees,

H. D. Nguyen, C. Zhang, Z. Xiao, and A. A. Chien, “Real-time serverless: En- abling application performance guarantees, ” inProceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Serverless Computing, 2019, pp. 1–6

2019
[39]

Streamlining cloud-native application development and deployment with robust encapsulation,

P. Lertpongrujikorn, H. D. Nguyen, and M. A. Salehi, “Streamlining cloud-native application development and deployment with robust encapsulation, ” inPro- ceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, ser. SoCC ’24, 2024, p. 847–865

2024
[40]

Object as a service: Simplifying cloud- native development through serverless object abstraction,

P. Lertpongrujikorn and M. A. Salehi, “Object as a service: Simplifying cloud- native development through serverless object abstraction, ”IEEE Transactions on Computers, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 423–434, 2026

2026
[41]

EdgeWeaver: Accelerating IoT application development across edge-cloud continuum,

P. Lertpongrujikorn, J. Kwon, H. D. Nguyen, and M. Amini Salehi, “EdgeWeaver: Accelerating IoT application development across edge-cloud continuum, ” in Proceedings of the 40th IEEE International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, ser. IPDPS ’26, May. 2026

2026
[42]

(2026) Microsoft office

Microsoft Corporation. (2026) Microsoft office. [Online]. Available: https: //www.office.com/

2026
[43]

Gener- ative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior,

J. S. Park, J. O’Brien, C. J. Cai, M. R. Morris, P. Liang, and M. S. Bernstein, “Gener- ative agents: Interactive simulacra of human behavior, ” inProceedings of the 36th 7 annual acm symposium on user interface software and technology, 2023, pp. 1–22

2023
[44]

Autonomous data agents: A new opportunity for smart data,

Y. Fu, D. Wang, W. Ying, X. Wang, X. Zhang, H. Liu, and J. Pei, “Autonomous data agents: A new opportunity for smart data, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.18710, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Taking flight with Copilot: Early insights and opportunities of ai-powered pair-programming tools,

C. Bird, D. Ford, T. Zimmermann, N. Forsgren, E. Kalliamvakou, T. Lowdermilk, and I. Gazit, “Taking flight with Copilot: Early insights and opportunities of ai-powered pair-programming tools, ”Queue, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 35–57, 2022

2022
[46]

A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: Workflow, infrastructure, and challenges,

X. Li, S. Wang, S. Zeng, Y. Wu, and Y. Yang, “A survey on LLM-based multi-agent systems: Workflow, infrastructure, and challenges, ”Vicinagearth, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 9, 2024

2024
[47]

The emergence of edge computing,

M. Satyanarayanan, “The emergence of edge computing, ”Computer, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2017

2017
[48]

A com- prehensive analysis of cloud service models: IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS in the context of emerging technologies and trend,

R. Younis, M. Iqbal, K. Munir, M. A. Javed, M. Haris, and S. Alahmari, “A com- prehensive analysis of cloud service models: IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS in the context of emerging technologies and trend, ” inProceedings of the 2024 International Conference on Electrical, Communication and Computer Engineering. IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

2024
[49]

The future of computing beyond Moore’s law,

J. Shalf, “The future of computing beyond Moore’s law, ”Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 378, no. 2166, p. 20190061, 2020

2020
[50]

Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.06205

K. Rallis, I. Liliopoulos, G. D. Varsamis, E. Tsipas, I. G. Karafyllidis, G. C. Sirak- oulis, and P. Dimitrakis, “Interfacing quantum computing systems with high- performance computing systems: an overview, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.06205, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[51]

Quantum cloud computing: Key tech- nologies, challenges, and opportunities,

A. Kumari, R. K. Behera, and B. Sahoo, “Quantum cloud computing: Key tech- nologies, challenges, and opportunities, ”Advances in Quantum Inspired Artificial Intelligence: Techniques and Applications, pp. 99–124, 2025

2025
[52]

Serverless computing: What it is, and what it is not?

S. Kounev, N. Herbst, C. L. Abad, A. Iosup, I. Foster, P. Shenoy, O. Rana, and A. A. Chien, “Serverless computing: What it is, and what it is not?”Communications of the ACM, vol. 66, no. 9, p. 80–92, 2023

2023
[53]

Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes,

B. Burns, B. Grant, D. Oppenheimer, E. Brewer, and J. Wilkes, “Borg, Omega, and Kubernetes, ”Communications of the ACM, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 50–57, 2016

2016
[54]

Bringing the web up to speed with WebAssembly,

A. Haas, A. Rossberg, D. L. Schuff, B. L. Titzer, M. Holman, D. Gohman, L. Wagner, A. Zakai, and J. Bastien, “Bringing the web up to speed with WebAssembly, ” in Proceedings of the 38th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation, ser. PLDI ’17, 2017, p. 185–200

2017
[55]

A cross-architecture evaluation of WebAssembly in the cloud-edge continuum,

S. Kakati and M. Brorsson, “A cross-architecture evaluation of WebAssembly in the cloud-edge continuum, ” inProceedings of the IEEE 24th International Sympo- sium on Cluster, Cloud and Internet Computing, ser. CCGrid ’24, 2024, pp. 337–346

2024
[56]

Object as a service (OaaS): Enabling object abstraction in serverless clouds,

P. Lertpongrujikorn and M. A. Salehi, “Object as a service (OaaS): Enabling object abstraction in serverless clouds, ” inProceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, ser. CLOUD ’23, 2023, pp. 238–248

2023
[57]

Action engine: Auto- matic workflow generation in FaaS,

A. Esashi, P. Lertpongrujikorn, S. Kato, and M. A. Salehi, “Action engine: Auto- matic workflow generation in FaaS, ”Future Generation Computer Systems, vol. 174, p. 107947, 2026

2026
[58]

Foundation CAN LM: A pretrained language model for automotive CAN data,

A. Esashi, P. Lertpongrujikorn, J. Makino, Y. Fujimoto, and M. Amini Salehi, “Foundation CAN LM: A pretrained language model for automotive CAN data, ” inProceedings of the 37th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Detroit, MI, USA, Jun. 2026

2026
[59]

Quantum Internet in the sky: Vision, challenges, solutions, and future directions,

P. V. Trinh and S. Sugiura, “Quantum Internet in the sky: Vision, challenges, solutions, and future directions, ”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 62–68, 2024

2024
[60]

On quantum computing for artificial superintelli- gence,

A. Grabowska and A. Gunia, “On quantum computing for artificial superintelli- gence, ”European Journal for Philosophy of Science, vol. 14, no. 2, p. 25, 2024

2024
[61]

Diaspora: Resilience-enabling services for real-time distributed workflows,

B. Nicolae, J. M. Wozniak, T. Bicer, H. Nguyen, P. Patel, H. Pan, A. Gueroudji, M. Gonthier, V. Hayot-Sasson, E. Huertaet al., “Diaspora: Resilience-enabling services for real-time distributed workflows, ” in2024 IEEE 20th International Conference on e-Science, ser. e-Science ’24, 2024, pp. 1–9

2024
[62]

Resilient execution of distributed x-ray image analysis workflows,

H. D. Nguyen, T. Bicer, B. Nicolae, R. Kettimuthu, E. A. Huerta, and I. T. Foster, “Resilient execution of distributed x-ray image analysis workflows, ”Frontiers in High Performance Computing, vol. 3, p. 1550855, 2025

2025
[63]

Komet: A serverless platform for low-earth orbit edge services,

T. Pfandzelter and D. Bermbach, “Komet: A serverless platform for low-earth orbit edge services, ” inProceedings of the 2024 ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, ser. SoCC ’24, 2024, p. 866–882

2024
[64]

Krios: Scheduling abstractions and mechanisms for enabling a LEO compute cloud,

V. Bhosale, A. Gavrilovska, and K. Bhardwaj, “Krios: Scheduling abstractions and mechanisms for enabling a LEO compute cloud, ” inProceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, ser. SoCC ’24, 2024, p. 322–340

2024
[65]

Towards sustainable cloud software systems through energy-aware code smell refactoring,

A. Imran, T. Kosar, J. Zola, and M. F. Bulut, “Towards sustainable cloud software systems through energy-aware code smell refactoring, ” inProceedings of the IEEE 17th International Conference on Cloud Computing, ser. CLOUD ’24. IEEE, 2024, pp. 223–234

2024
[66]

Towards carbon-aware data transfers,

J. Goldverg, H. Jamil, E. Rodrigues, and T. Kosar, “Towards carbon-aware data transfers, ”IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 19–26, 2025

2025
[67]

A new golden age for computer architecture,

J. L. Hennessy and D. A. Patterson, “A new golden age for computer architecture, ” Communications of the ACM, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 48–60, 2019

2019
[68]

Processing-in- memory: A workload-driven perspective,

S. Ghose, A. Boroumand, J. S. Kim, J. Gómez-Luna, and O. Mutlu, “Processing-in- memory: A workload-driven perspective, ”IBM Journal of Research and Develop- ment, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 3–1, 2019

2019
[69]

Jevons’ paradox,

B. Alcott, “Jevons’ paradox, ”Ecological Economics, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2005

2005
[70]

Carbon-aware temporal data transfer scheduling across cloud datacenters,

E. Rodrigues, J. Goldverg, and T. Kosar, “Carbon-aware temporal data transfer scheduling across cloud datacenters, ”Proceedings of the IEEE 18th International Conference on Cloud Computing, 2025

2025
[71]

Cost effectiveness of reusable launch vehicles depending on the payload capacity,

S.-Y. Kang, M.-S. Jo, J.-Y. Choi, and S. S. Yang, “Cost effectiveness of reusable launch vehicles depending on the payload capacity, ”Aerospace, vol. 12, no. 5, p. 364, 2025

2025
[72]

Mankins,The Case for Space Solar Power

J. Mankins,The Case for Space Solar Power. Virginia Edition Publishing Houston, TX, USA, 2014

2014
[73]

(2026) Starcloud official website

Starcloud. (2026) Starcloud official website. [Online]. Available: https://www. starcloud.com/

2026
[74]

Datacenters go to space,

S. Greengard, “Datacenters go to space, ” https://cacm.acm.org/news/datacenters- go-to-space/, 2025

2025
[75]

The role of agentic AI in shaping a smart future: A systematic review,

S. Hosseini and H. Seilani, “The role of agentic AI in shaping a smart future: A systematic review, ”Array, p. 100399, 2025

2025
[76]

Colledanchise and P

M. Colledanchise and P. Ögren,Behavior Trees in Robotics and AI: An Introduction. CRC Press, 2018

2018
[77]

Api- bank: A benchmark for tool-augmented llms

M. Li, Y. Zhao, B. Yu, F. Song, H. Li, H. Yu, Z. Li, F. Huang, and Y. Li, “Api- Bank: A comprehensive benchmark for tool-augmented LLMs, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.08244, 2023

work page arXiv 2023
[78]

Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools,

T. Schick, J. Dwivedi-Yu, R. Dessì, R. Raileanu, M. Lomeli, E. Hambro, L. Zettle- moyer, N. Cancedda, and T. Scialom, “Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools, ”Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 36, pp. 68 539–68 551, 2023

2023
[79]

SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through bioinspired multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning,

A. Ghafarollahi and M. J. Buehler, “SciAgents: Automating scientific discovery through bioinspired multi-agent intelligent graph reasoning, ”Advanced Materials, vol. 37, no. 22, p. 2413523, 2025

2025
[80]

Downsides of smartness across edge-cloud continuum in modern industry,

A. G. Chigullapally, S. Vittala, R. F. Hussian, and M. A. Salehi, “Downsides of smartness across edge-cloud continuum in modern industry, ”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.29289, 2026

work page arXiv 2026

Showing first 80 references.