arxiv: 2604.12597 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Unveiling Dominant Toroidal Magnetic Fields in a Protostellar Outflow

Tao-Chung Ching , Zhi-Yun Li , Qizhou Zhang , Josep Miquel Girart , Shih-Ping Lai , Chin-Fei Lee , Di Li , Ramprasad Rao

show 1 more author

Emmanuel Momjian

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.GA

keywords protostellar outflowtoroidal magnetic fieldCO polarizationmagneto-centrifugal mechanismNGC1333 IRAS 4Amagnetic hoop stresscurrent density

0 comments

The pith

Polarization observations of CO emission show dominant toroidal magnetic fields in a protostellar outflow

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents polarization measurements of carbon monoxide emission from the outflow driven by the NGC1333 IRAS 4A protostar. These data indicate that the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field lies perpendicular to the outflow axis and follows the rotational structure, implying a toroidal geometry. The authors estimate field strengths of a few milligauss and argue that this configuration supplies enough magnetic hoop stress to collimate and accelerate the gas at distances of several hundred astronomical units. They also report a linear relation between the curl of the observed magnetic field and the line-of-sight current density. The results are presented as direct evidence supporting the magneto-centrifugal launching and collimation of protostellar winds.

Core claim

The inferred magnetic fields are perpendicular to the outflow axis and aligned with the rotational structure of the outflow, indicating toroidal fields with strengths of a few milligauss, sufficient to collimate and accelerate the outflow at several hundred astronomical units from the protostar. A linear correlation is found between the curl of plane-of-the-sky magnetic field and the line-of-sight electric current density.

What carries the argument

Polarization of CO emission used to infer the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field direction, revealing a toroidal geometry aligned with outflow rotation.

Load-bearing premise

The polarization of CO emission is assumed to trace the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field direction via standard alignment mechanisms without significant contamination from scattering, projection effects, or other polarization sources.

What would settle it

A map showing polarization angles inconsistent with toroidal geometry or direct Zeeman measurements yielding field strengths too weak to supply the required hoop stress would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.12597 by Chin-Fei Lee, Di Li, Emmanuel Momjian, Josep Miquel Girart, Qizhou Zhang, Ramprasad Rao, Shih-Ping Lai, Tao-Chung Ching, Zhi-Yun Li.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: IRAS 4A CO 𝐽 = 2−1 polarization maps at velocity channels of 3.175 km s−1 intervals. Red and blue filled contours represent the total emission of the redshifted and blueshifted outflows, respectively. Contours start from 5𝜎𝐼 in steps of 10𝜎𝐼 with 𝜎𝐼 = 4.8 mJy beam−1 , which is the noise level of total emission (Stokes I). The central channel velocities with respect to the systemic velocity (𝑣𝐿𝑆𝑅 = 6.86 km … view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Velocity-integrated intensity map (moment 0), intensity-weighted mean velocity map (moment 1), and PV diagrams of the IRAS 4A CO outflows. a, Velocity-integrated polarization map with filled contours from 5𝜎𝑖𝑛𝑡 in steps of 5𝜎𝑖𝑛𝑡 with 𝜎𝑖𝑛𝑡 = 0.11 Jy beam−1 km s−1 . Black and white segments show the polarization orientations of the CO redshifted emission and the magnetic field orientations inferred from the… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Linear polarization percentage of the CO 𝐽 = 2–1 GK effect as a function of optical depth. We consider gas temperature of 70 K, background temperature of 2.7 K, and inclination angle of 18◦ for the GK effect model. The solid and dashed lines represent the GK effect arising from toroidal and poloidal magnetic fields, respectively. The black lines, red lines, and blue lines represent the GK effect at 𝑛𝐻2 = 1… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: The correlation between curl of magnetic field strength and pseudo-electric current density. The pseudo-electric current density inferred from CO total emission is plotted in the 𝑥 axis, and the curl of 𝐵𝑝𝑜𝑠 inferred from CO linear polarization is plotted in the 𝑦 axis. The cyan triangles, red dots, orange squares, and green diamonds show the data points with error bars (1𝜎) derived from the four velocity … view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Channel maps of magnetic field segments in the 4A1 redshifted outflow. Red and blue filled contours represent the gas number density of the redshifted and blueshifted outflows with levels starting from 5 × 104 cm−3 in steps of 105 cm−3 . The black segments show the magnetic field orientation with length proportional to the field strength. The labels of channel velocities, synthesized beam, length scale, an… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: 50 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p050_4.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Magnetic fields play a fundamental role in the formation of protostellar winds. In the magneto-centrifugal models, poloidal magnetic fields launch winds from accretion disks, and fast-rotating gas twists the fields into toroidal geometry that collimates and accelerates winds through magnetic hoop stress. However, toroidal fields in protostellar winds remain observationally unresolved. Here we report polarization observations of carbon monoxide emission toward the NGC1333 IRAS 4A protostellar outflow. The inferred magnetic fields are perpendicular to the outflow axis and aligned with the rotational structure of the outflow, indicating toroidal fields with strengths of a few milligauss, sufficient to collimate and accelerate the outflow at several hundred astronomical units from the protostar. A linear correlation is found between the curl of plane-of-the-sky magnetic field and the line-of-sight electric current density. Our analysis provides better constraints on ion-electron drift velocity in protostellar outflows and supports rotating outflows driven by the magneto-centrifugal mechanism.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper gives new CO polarization maps in NGC1333 IRAS 4A that they read as dominant toroidal fields plus a B-curl vs current-density correlation, but the 90-degree Goldreich-Kylafis ambiguity is not resolved.

read the letter

The main news is the polarization data on the NGC1333 IRAS 4A outflow. The authors map CO emission and infer plane-of-sky fields that sit perpendicular to the outflow axis and line up with the rotation pattern. They convert that geometry into toroidal fields of a few milligauss at a few hundred AU and report a linear relation between the curl of those fields and the line-of-sight current density. Both the geometry claim and the correlation are presented as direct tests of magneto-centrifugal wind models, and the data themselves appear to be new for this source. That is the concrete advance: resolved polarization vectors tied to an outflow with a reported current-density link. The work is straightforward in its presentation of the maps and the basic inference steps. The correlation is an extra observational handle that has not been shown before for this object. The field-strength numbers follow from standard assumptions about density and alignment, which the authors state clearly. The soft spot is the Goldreich-Kylafis 90-degree ambiguity. For molecular lines the polarization can be either parallel or perpendicular to the projected B-field depending on optical depth and excitation; the paper does not supply the radiative-transfer checks or multi-transition constraints needed to fix the choice for this CO line and these conditions. If the vectors are flipped, the toroidal geometry becomes poloidal and both the collimation argument and the current-density correlation lose their force. Density assumptions for the milligauss estimate are also not tightly bounded, and checks against scattering or other polarization sources are light. The paper is aimed at people who work on magnetic fields in protostellar outflows and star-formation theory. The raw polarization maps and the correlation are worth referee time even if the geometry needs more work to stand up. I would send it to peer review.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports polarization observations of CO emission toward the NGC1333 IRAS 4A protostellar outflow. The authors interpret the polarization vectors as tracing magnetic fields perpendicular to the outflow axis and aligned with the outflow's rotational structure, concluding that toroidal fields dominate with strengths of a few milligauss at scales of several hundred AU. These fields are argued to be sufficient for collimation and acceleration via magnetic hoop stress. A linear correlation is also reported between the curl of the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field and the line-of-sight electric current density, providing support for the magneto-centrifugal driving mechanism.

Significance. If the geometric and strength inferences are robust, the work would offer valuable direct observational constraints on toroidal magnetic fields in protostellar outflows, a key but elusive prediction of magneto-centrifugal wind models. The reported field strengths and B-curl vs. J correlation would help quantify the role of magnetic fields in outflow dynamics at hundreds of AU, advancing models of angular momentum transport and wind launching in low-mass star formation.

major comments (3)

[§3 (Polarization Analysis and Magnetic Field Geometry)] The central claim that the fields are toroidal (perpendicular to the outflow axis) depends on interpreting the CO polarization direction as tracing the plane-of-the-sky B-field. The Goldreich-Kylafis 90° ambiguity is not resolved: no radiative-transfer modeling, optical-depth analysis, or multi-transition constraints are presented to determine whether polarization is parallel or perpendicular to the projected B for the specific CO transition and outflow conditions. This directly risks inverting the toroidal/poloidal assignment and invalidating the collimation argument.
[§5 (Field Strength Estimation)] The field-strength estimates of a few milligauss are derived from assumed gas densities (or excitation conditions) and the polarization fraction. The manuscript does not detail the exact method (e.g., Chandrasekhar-Fermi variant or other) or test sensitivity to the density assumption, which is a free parameter in the analysis. This undermines the quantitative claim that the fields are 'sufficient to collimate and accelerate' the outflow.
[§4.3 (Correlation Analysis)] The reported linear correlation between the curl of the plane-of-the-sky B and the line-of-sight current density requires clarification on projection effects and how the curl is computed from 2D vectors alone. The statistical significance (e.g., fit slope, R², or p-value) is not quantified in the text or figures, weakening the support for the current-density interpretation.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract] The abstract does not specify the CO transition observed (e.g., J=2-1); this detail should be added for reproducibility.
[Figures 1-3] Figure captions lack information on beam size, polarization fraction threshold for vector plotting, and any debiasing applied to the vectors.
[References] A few references on the Goldreich-Kylafis effect applied to molecular outflows in star-forming regions are missing from the discussion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments have highlighted important areas for clarification and improvement. We address each major comment point-by-point below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3 (Polarization Analysis and Magnetic Field Geometry)] The central claim that the fields are toroidal (perpendicular to the outflow axis) depends on interpreting the CO polarization direction as tracing the plane-of-the-sky B-field. The Goldreich-Kylafis 90° ambiguity is not resolved: no radiative-transfer modeling, optical-depth analysis, or multi-transition constraints are presented to determine whether polarization is parallel or perpendicular to the projected B for the specific CO transition and outflow conditions. This directly risks inverting the toroidal/poloidal assignment and invalidating the collimation argument.

Authors: We acknowledge the Goldreich-Kylafis 90° ambiguity inherent to interpreting CO polarization. Our toroidal field interpretation is based on the observed alignment of polarization vectors with the outflow's rotational structure and consistency with magneto-centrifugal wind models. In the revised manuscript, we will add an explicit discussion in §3 of the ambiguity, including references to prior work on GK effects in molecular outflows, and justify our choice of orientation while noting that full radiative transfer modeling would require additional data not available here. revision: partial
Referee: [§5 (Field Strength Estimation)] The field-strength estimates of a few milligauss are derived from assumed gas densities (or excitation conditions) and the polarization fraction. The manuscript does not detail the exact method (e.g., Chandrasekhar-Fermi variant or other) or test sensitivity to the density assumption, which is a free parameter in the analysis. This undermines the quantitative claim that the fields are 'sufficient to collimate and accelerate' the outflow.

Authors: The estimates were obtained via a Chandrasekhar-Fermi approach using the observed polarization fraction and velocity dispersion, with densities inferred from CO excitation. We will revise §5 to provide the explicit formula, list all assumptions, and include a sensitivity test varying the density by a factor of a few to confirm the field strengths remain in the few-milligauss regime and sufficient for collimation. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.3 (Correlation Analysis)] The reported linear correlation between the curl of the plane-of-the-sky B and the line-of-sight current density requires clarification on projection effects and how the curl is computed from 2D vectors alone. The statistical significance (e.g., fit slope, R², or p-value) is not quantified in the text or figures, weakening the support for the current-density interpretation.

Authors: We will expand §4.3 to describe the numerical computation of the curl from the 2D vectors, explicitly note the projection limitations, and report quantitative statistics including the slope, R², and p-value both in the text and figure caption to substantiate the correlation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational mapping from CO polarization to toroidal B geometry

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on polarization observations of CO emission in NGC1333 IRAS 4A, with B-field directions inferred via standard alignment mechanisms and a reported correlation between curl(B_POS) and J_LOS. No equations or steps reduce the target results (toroidal geometry, field strengths, or correlation) to fitted parameters or self-citations by construction. The derivation chain is self-contained against external data and does not invoke load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results as new derivations. This is the expected outcome for a direct measurement paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review limited to abstract; full paper likely contains additional free parameters for converting polarization to field strength and current density. The ledger below reflects only what is explicit or strongly implied in the abstract.

free parameters (1)

gas density or excitation conditions for B-field strength
Field strength of a few milligauss is derived from polarization data and must depend on assumed physical conditions such as density, which are not specified in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption CO polarization traces the plane-of-the-sky magnetic field orientation
Central to inferring toroidal geometry from the observed polarization directions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5505 in / 1355 out tokens · 74808 ms · 2026-05-10T14:51:03.507194+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

Blandford, R. D. & Payne, D. G. Hydromagnetic flows from accretion disks and the production of radio jets. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.199, 883–903 (1982)

1982
[2]

H., Najita, J

Shu, F. H., Najita, J. R., Shang, H. & Li, Z. Y. X-Winds Theory and Observations. In Mannings, V., Boss, A. P. & Russell, S. S. (eds.)Protostars and Planets IV, 789–814 (2000)

2000
[3]

Disk Winds, Jets, and Outflows: Theoretical and Computational Foundations

Pudritz, R. E., Ouyed, R., Fendt, C. & Brandenburg, A. Disk Winds, Jets, and Outflows: Theoretical and Computational Foundations. In Reipurth, B., Jewitt, D. & Keil, K. (eds.) Protostars and Planets V, 277 (2007).astro-ph/0603592

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[4]

Moll, R., Spruit, H. C. & Obergaulinger, M. Kink instabilities in jets from rotating magnetic fields. Astron. & Astrophys.492, 621–630 (2008).0809.3165

work page arXiv 2008
[5]

On the nature of bipolar sources in dense molecular clouds

Konigl, A. On the nature of bipolar sources in dense molecular clouds. Astrophys. J.261, 115–134 (1982)

1982
[6]

C., Foglizzo, T

Spruit, H. C., Foglizzo, T. & Stehle, R. Collimation of magnetically driven jets from accretion discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.288, 333–342 (1997)

1997
[7]

Albertazzi, B. et al. Laboratory formation of a scaled protostellar jet by coaligned poloidal magnetic field. Science346, 325–328 (2014)

2014
[8]

Lei, Z. et al. Laboratory evidence of confinement and acceleration of wide-angle flows by toroidal magnetic fields. Communications Physics7, 107 (2024)

2024
[9]

Chrysostomou, A., Lucas, P. W. & Hough, J. H. Circular polarimetry reveals helical magnetic fields in the young stellar object HH135-136. Nature450, 71–73 (2007).0710.5927. 30

work page arXiv 2007
[10]

Carrasco-Gonz ´alez, C. et al. A Magnetized Jet from a Massive Protostar. Science330, 1209 (2010).1011.6254

work page arXiv 2010
[11]

Rodr ´ıguez-Kamenetzky, A. et al. Helical Magnetic Field in a Massive Protostellar Jet. Astrophys. J.978, L31 (2025).2501.07622

work page arXiv 2025
[12]

& Kuiper, R

Moscadelli, L., Sanna, A., Beuther, H., Oliva, A. & Kuiper, R. Snapshot of a magnetohy- drodynamic disk wind traced by water maser observations. Nature Astronomy6, 1068–1076 (2022).2209.00432

work page arXiv 2022
[13]

& Kuiper, R

Oliva, A. & Kuiper, R. Modeling disks and magnetic outflows around a forming massive star. II. Dynamics of jets from massive protostars. A&A669, A81 (2023).2210.01492

work page arXiv 2023
[14]

Lee, C.-F. et al. Unveiling a magnetized jet from a low-mass protostar.Nature Communications 9, 4636 (2018)

2018
[15]

D., Russell, A

Sandell, G., Aspin, C., Duncan, W. D., Russell, A. P. G. & Robson, E. I. NGC 1333 IRAS 4: A Very Young, Low-Luminosity Binary System.Astrophys. J.376, L17 (1991)

1991
[16]

W., Mundy, L

Looney, L. W., Mundy, L. G. & Welch, W. J. Unveiling the Circumstellar Envelope and Disk: A Subarcsecond Survey of Circumstellar Structures.Astrophys. J.529, 477–498 (2000). astro-ph/9908301

work page arXiv 2000
[17]

Ortiz-Le ´on, G. N. et al. The Gould’s Belt Distances Survey (GOBELINS). V. Distances and Kinematics of the Perseus Molecular Cloud. Astrophys. J.865, 73 (2018).1808.03499. 31

work page arXiv 2018
[18]

M., Rao, R

Girart, J. M., Rao, R. & Marrone, D. P. Magnetic Fields in the Formation of Sun-Like Stars. Science313, 812–814 (2006).astro-ph/0609177

work page arXiv 2006
[19]

& Girart, J

Gonc ¸alves, J., Galli, D. & Girart, J. M. Modeling the magnetic field in the protostellar source NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. Astron. & Astrophys.490, L39–L42 (2008).0809.5278

work page arXiv 2008
[20]

& Girart, J

Frau, P., Galli, D. & Girart, J. M. Comparing star formation models with interferometric observations of the protostar NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. I. Magnetohydrodynamic collapse models. Astron. & Astrophys.535, A44 (2011).1109.6251

work page arXiv 2011
[21]

Choi, M. et al. Variability of the NGC 1333 IRAS 4A Outflow: Molecular Hydrogen and Silicon Monoxide Images. Astrophys. J.646, 1050–1058 (2006).astro-ph/0604400

work page arXiv 2006
[22]

M., Crutcher, R

Girart, J. M., Crutcher, R. M. & Rao, R. Detection of Polarized CO Emission from the Molecular Outflow in NGC 1333 IRAS 4A. Astrophys. J.525, L109–L112 (1999)

1999
[23]

Su, Y.-N. et al. The Infall Motion in the Low-mass Protostellar Binary NGC 1333 IRAS 4A1/4A2. Astrophys. J.885, 98 (2019).1909.12443

work page arXiv 2019
[24]

Chahine, L. et al. Multiple chemical tracers finally unveil the intricate NGC 1333 IRAS 4A outflow system. FAUST XVI. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.531, 2653–2668 (2024).2405. 12735

2024
[25]

& Kylafis, N

Goldreich, P. & Kylafis, N. D. On mapping the magnetic field direction in molecular clouds by polarization measurements. Astrophys. J.243, L75–L78 (1981). 32

1981
[26]

& Watson, W

Deguchi, S. & Watson, W. D. Linear polarization of molecular lines at radio frequencies. Astrophys. J.285, 126–133 (1984)

1984
[27]

Lai, S.-P., Girart, J. M. & Crutcher, R. M. Interferometric Mapping of Magnetic Fields in Star- forming Regions. III. Dust and CO Polarization in DR 21(OH). Astrophys. J.598, 392–399 (2003).astro-ph/0308051

work page arXiv 2003
[28]

Hirota, T. et al. Magnetic Field Structure of Orion Source I. Astrophys. J.896, 157 (2020). 2005.13077

work page arXiv 2020
[29]

Cort ´es, P. C.et al. Magnetic Fields in Massive Star-forming Regions (MagMaR). II. Tomogra- phy through Dust and Molecular Line Polarization in NGC 6334I(N). Astrophys. J.923, 204 (2021).2109.09270

work page arXiv 2021
[30]

Barnes, P. J. et al. SOFIA and ALMA Investigate Magnetic Fields and Gas Structures in Massive Star Formation: The Case of the Masquerading Monster in BYF 73. Astrophys. J. 945, 34 (2023).2301.03618

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

Ching, T.-C. et al. Helical Magnetic Fields in the NGC 1333 IRAS 4A Protostellar Outflows. Astrophys. J.819, 159 (2016).1601.05229

work page arXiv 2016
[32]

& Chamma, M

Houde, M., Lankhaar, B., Rajabi, F. & Chamma, M. A. The generation and transformation of polarization signals in molecular lines through collective anisotropic resonant scattering. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.511, 295–315 (2022).2112.15104

work page arXiv 2022
[33]

Bino, G. et al. Synthetic Polarization Maps of an Outflow Zone from Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations. ApJ936, 29 (2022).2207.01743. 33

work page arXiv 2022
[34]

Hirota, T. et al. Disk-driven rotating bipolar outflow in Orion Source I. Nature Astronomy1, 0146 (2017).1712.04606

work page Pith review arXiv 2017
[35]

G., Reipurth, B., Ostriker, E

Lee, C.-F., Mundy, L. G., Reipurth, B., Ostriker, E. C. & Stone, J. M. CO Outflows from Young Stars: Confronting the Jet and Wind Models. Astrophys. J.542, 925–945 (2000)

2000
[36]

& Vlemmings, W

Lankhaar, B. & Vlemmings, W. Collisional polarization of molecular ions: a signpost of ambipolar diffusion. A&A638, L7 (2020).2006.12524

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

& Kylafis, N

Tritsis, A. & Kylafis, N. Extension of the multilevel radiative transfer code PyRaTE to model linear polarization of molecular lines. A&A692, A75 (2024)

2024
[38]

& Lai, S.-P

Yang, L.-W. & Lai, S.-P. Probing the magnetic field structure in star-forming re- gions through molecular line polarization. In ASRROC 2010 Symposium Proceedings, vol. 8 (2010). URLhttp://www-ws.gov.taipei/001/Upload/public/ Attachment/15911484947.pdf. Conference proceeding

work page arXiv 2010
[39]

Huang, K.-Y. et al. Mapping Circumstellar Magnetic Fields of Late-type Evolved Stars with the Goldreich-Kylafis Effect: CARMA Observations at𝜆1.3 mm of R Crt and R Leo.ApJ899, 152 (2020).2007.00215

work page arXiv 2020
[40]

C., Crutcher, R

Cortes, P. C., Crutcher, R. M. & Watson, W. D. Line Polarization of Molecular Lines at Radio Frequencies: The Case of DR 21(OH). ApJ628, 780–788 (2005).astro-ph/0504258

work page arXiv 2005
[41]

ALMA Cycle 4 Technical Handbook

ALMA Partnership. ALMA Cycle 4 Technical Handbook. Atacama Large Millime- ter/submillimeter Array (2016). ALMA Technical Handbook. 34

2016
[42]

The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields

Davis, L. The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields. Physical Review81, 890–891 (1951)

1951
[43]

& Fermi, E

Chandrasekhar, S. & Fermi, E. Magnetic Fields in Spiral Arms. Astrophys. J.118, 113 (1953)

1953
[44]

Draine, B. T. Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium (Princeton University Press, 2011)

2011
[45]

Pineda, J. E. et al. Probing the physics of star formation (ProPStar). I. First resolved maps of the electron fraction and cosmic-ray ionization rate in NGC 1333. A&A686, A162 (2024). 2402.16202

work page arXiv 2024
[46]

Mangum, J. G. & Shirley, Y. L. How to Calculate Molecular Column Density. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.127, 266 (2015).1501.01703

work page arXiv 2015
[47]

Yen, H.-W. et al. Constraint on ion-neutral drift velocity in the Class 0 protostar B335 from ALMA observations. Astron. & Astrophys.615, A58 (2018).1803.09893

work page arXiv 2018
[48]

& Koenigl, A

Wardle, M. & Koenigl, A. The Structure of Protostellar Accretion Disks and the Origin of Bipolar Flows. Astrophys. J.410, 218 (1993)

1993
[49]

Mazzei, R. et al. Modelling CN Zeeman effect observations of the envelopes of a low-mass protostellar disc and a massive protostar. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.527, 8618–8632 (2024). 2312.00884

work page arXiv 2024
[50]

Kirk, J. M. et al. First results from the Herschel Gould Belt Survey in Taurus. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.432, 1424–1433 (2013).1304.4098. 35

work page arXiv 2013
[51]

Yıldız, U. A.et al. APEX-CHAMP+ high-J CO observations of low-mass young stellar objects. III. NGC 1333 IRAS 4A/4B envelope, outflow, and ultraviolet heating. Astron. & Astrophys. 542, A86 (2012).1203.2965

work page arXiv 2012
[52]

& Pudritz, R

Banerjee, R. & Pudritz, R. E. Outflows and Jets from Collapsing Magnetized Cloud Cores. Astrophys. J.641, 949–960 (2006).astro-ph/0508374

work page arXiv 2006
[53]

N., Inutsuka, S.-i

Machida, M. N., Inutsuka, S.-i. & Matsumoto, T. High- and Low-Velocity Magnetized Outflows in the Star Formation Process in a Gravitationally Collapsing Cloud.Astrophys. J.676, 1088– 1108 (2008)

2008
[54]

& Machida, M

Basu, S., Sharkawi, M. & Machida, M. N. Outflows Driven from a Magnetic Pseudodisk. Astrophys. J.964, 116 (2024).2401.04260

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Hull, C. L. H. et al. Misalignment of Magnetic Fields and Outflows in Protostellar Cores. Astrophys. J.768, 159 (2013).1212.0540

work page arXiv 2013
[56]

Seifried, D., Banerjee, R., Pudritz, R. E. & Klessen, R. S. Accretion and magnetic field morphology around Class 0 stage protostellar discs. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.446, 2776– 2788 (2015).1408.2989

work page arXiv 2015
[57]

N., Hirano, S

Machida, M. N., Hirano, S. & Kitta, H. Misalignment of magnetic fields, outflows, and discs in star-forming clouds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.491, 2180–2197 (2020).1911.03851

work page arXiv 2020
[58]

Matsumoto, T., Machida, M. N. & Inutsuka, S.-i. Circumstellar Disks and Outflows in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Cores: Possible Formation Mechanism for Misaligned Systems.Astrophys. J. 839, 69 (2017).1703.09139. 36

work page arXiv 2017
[59]

Ko, C.-L. et al. Resolving Linear Polarization due to Emission and Extinction of Aligned Dust Grains on NGC 1333 IRAS4A with JVLA and ALMA. Astrophys. J.889, 172 (2020). 1909.09628

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

& Shu, F

Li, Z.-Y. & Shu, F. H. Magnetized Singular Isothermal Toroids.Astrophys. J.472, 211 (1996)

1996
[61]

Pattle, K. et al. The JCMT BISTRO Survey: The Magnetic Field Strength in the Orion A Filament. Astrophys. J.846, 122 (2017).1707.05269

work page arXiv 2017
[62]

C., Stone, J

Ostriker, E. C., Stone, J. M. & Gammie, C. F. Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models. Astrophys. J.546, 980–1005 (2001).astro-ph/ 0008454

2001
[63]

Dickman, R. L. The ratio of carbon monoxide to molecular hydrogen in interstellar dark clouds. Astrophys. J. Suppl.37, 407–427 (1978)

1978
[64]

Zucker, C. et al. Mapping Distances across the Perseus Molecular Cloud Using CO Ob- servations, Stellar Photometry, and Gaia DR2 Parallax Measurements. ApJ869, 83 (2018). 1803.08931

work page arXiv 2018
[65]

Vlemmings, W. H. T. & Tafoya, D. Polarisation of molecular lines in the circumstellar envelope of the post-asymptotic giant branch star OH 17.7-2.0.A&A671, A117 (2023).2302.01112

work page arXiv 2023
[66]

Vlemmings, W. H. T., Lankhaar, B. & Velilla-Prieto, L. Molecular line polarisation from the circumstellar envelopes of asymptotic giant branch stars. A&A686, A274 (2024).2404. 01681. 37

2024
[67]

A., Asgari-Targhi, M

Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Guerra, J. A., Asgari-Targhi, M. & Schmelz, J. T. The Strength and Structure of the Magnetic Field in the Galactic Outflow of Messier 82. ApJ914, 24 (2021). 2102.03362

work page arXiv 2021
[68]

A., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Chuss, D

Guerra, J. A., Lopez-Rodriguez, E., Chuss, D. T., Butterfield, N. O. & Schmelz, J. T. The Strength of the Sheared Magnetic Field in the Galactic’s Circumnuclear Disk. AJ166, 37 (2023).2304.06823

work page arXiv 2023
[69]

Lopez-Rodriguez, E. et al. The magnetic fields of the dusty nuclei and molecular outflows of arp 220. The Astrophysical Journal Letters996, L27 (2026). URLhttps://doi.org/ 10.3847/2041-8213/ae2ed6

work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae2ed6 2026
[70]

Wardle, J. F. C. & Kronberg, P. P. The linear polarization of quasi-stellar radio sources at 3.71 and 11.1 centimeters. ApJ194, 249 (1974). AcknowledgementsThis paper makes use of the following ALMA data: ADS/JAO.ALMA#2016.1.01089.S. ALMA is a partnership of ESO (representing its member states), NSF (USA) and NINS (Japan), together with NRC (Canada), MOST...

1974