pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.13936 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

Topological markers for a one-dimensional fermionic chain coupled to a single-mode cavity

Anna Ritz-Zwilling , Olesia Dmytruk
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chaincavity QEDtopological markerswinding numberResta polarizationhigh-frequency expansioninteracting fermionsedge states
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cavity-mediated interactions in an SSH chain produce consistent topological phases detected by winding number, polarization, and edge correlations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors couple a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain to a single-mode cavity and focus on the off-resonant regime. They derive an effective interacting fermionic Hamiltonian through high-frequency expansion and then apply three markers designed for interacting systems: two-point correlation functions on open chains to detect edge states, a winding number constructed from the single-particle Green's function, and bulk electric polarization via Resta's many-body formula on periodic chains. These markers agree closely on the resulting phase diagram, confirming that cavity effects can be tracked through the effective electronic model. This approach offers an alternative route to cavity-modified topology that avoids direct solution of the full light-matter Hamiltonian.

Core claim

For a finite-size Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain coupled to a cavity, the effective fermionic Hamiltonian obtained from high-frequency expansion in the off-resonant regime exhibits topological phases whose boundaries are located consistently by the Green's-function winding number and by Resta polarization; the associated edge states are independently verified by the decay behavior of the two-point correlation function between opposite ends of an open chain.

What carries the argument

Three adapted topological markers—edge two-point correlations, Green's-function winding number, and Resta many-body polarization—applied to the cavity-derived effective interacting Hamiltonian.

If this is right

  • Cavity effects on topology can be studied entirely within an interacting fermionic model rather than the complete light-matter system.
  • The three markers remain reliable even after cavity-induced interactions are included.
  • Edge-state signatures survive in the effective description and can be checked via open-boundary correlations.
  • The method supplies an independent check on phase diagrams previously obtained by direct light-matter treatments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same marker set could be tested on other one-dimensional chains or on two-dimensional lattices coupled to cavities.
  • Finite-size scaling of the correlation length or polarization could reveal how cavity strength influences the robustness of the topological phase.
  • Experimental platforms such as circuit QED or trapped-ion chains might realize the predicted effective interactions and allow direct measurement of the markers.

Load-bearing premise

The high-frequency expansion remains accurate enough in the off-resonant regime to capture all cavity-mediated interactions that affect the topological markers in the finite-size chain.

What would settle it

A numerical diagonalization of the full light-matter Hamiltonian or an experiment that finds the phase boundaries predicted by the effective model to disagree with those obtained from the winding number or polarization calculations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.13936 by Anna Ritz-Zwilling, Olesia Dmytruk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. SSH chain placed inside a single-mode cavity with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Comparison of two-point correlation function [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase diagram for a cavity embedded SSH chain with periodic boundary conditions as a function of coupling strength [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Phase diagram for a cavity embedded SSH chain [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study a Su-Schrieffer-Heeger chain coupled to a single mode photonic cavity. Considering an off-resonant regime we use the high-frequency expansion in order to obtain an effective fermionic Hamiltonian with cavity-mediated interactions. We characterize the effects of the cavity on topology in a finite size chain by studying three different markers adapted for interacting systems: correlation functions between edges in a chain with open boundary conditions, and a winding number based on the single-particle Green's function and bulk electric polarization via the many-body formula by Resta for a chain with periodic boundary conditions. There is excellent agreement between the winding number and polarization approaches to compute the phase diagram, with the presence of the edge states being confirmed through the calculations of the two-point correlation function. Our approach provides an alternative perspective on cavity-modified topological phases through a study of an effective interacting electronic Hamiltonian and complements methods that treat the full light-matter Hamiltonian directly.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies an SSH fermionic chain coupled to a single-mode cavity in the off-resonant regime. A high-frequency expansion is applied to derive an effective interacting fermionic Hamiltonian with cavity-mediated terms. Topology in finite chains is characterized via three markers: edge two-point correlation functions (open boundaries), winding number from the single-particle Green's function, and Resta polarization (periodic boundaries). Excellent agreement is reported between the winding number and polarization for the phase diagram, with edge states confirmed by the correlations. The work positions this effective-model approach as complementary to direct light-matter treatments.

Significance. If the high-frequency expansion is shown to be faithful, the paper supplies a practical route to cavity-modified topology via an effective electronic Hamiltonian, avoiding full photon-space diagonalization. The use of multiple adapted markers (Green's function winding, Resta polarization, and edge correlations) for interacting systems is a constructive contribution and could aid future studies of light-matter topological phases.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on model and effective Hamiltonian] The derivation of the effective Hamiltonian via high-frequency expansion (Section on model and effective Hamiltonian) is central to all subsequent claims, yet the manuscript provides no benchmark against the full light-matter Hamiltonian with photon truncation. Direct comparison of phase boundaries or correlation functions, even for small N and truncated photon number, is required to confirm that the reported topology reflects the actual cavity-coupled system rather than an internal property of the approximated model.
  2. [Results section and phase-diagram figures] The claim of 'excellent agreement' between winding number and Resta polarization (results section and phase-diagram figures) is load-bearing for the central conclusion but lacks quantitative support such as tabulated critical-point deviations, overlap integrals of phase regions, or error estimates across parameter scans.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Effective Hamiltonian derivation] Notation for the cavity-mediated interaction terms in the effective Hamiltonian should be cross-referenced explicitly to the original light-matter coupling to aid reproducibility.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the phase diagrams would benefit from explicit statements of the system size N, photon truncation, and the frequency ratio used in the expansion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and the positive assessment of the significance of our work. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The derivation of the effective Hamiltonian via high-frequency expansion (Section on model and effective Hamiltonian) is central to all subsequent claims, yet the manuscript provides no benchmark against the full light-matter Hamiltonian with photon truncation. Direct comparison of phase boundaries or correlation functions, even for small N and truncated photon number, is required to confirm that the reported topology reflects the actual cavity-coupled system rather than an internal property of the approximated model.

    Authors: We agree that a direct benchmark would strengthen the validation of the high-frequency expansion. While the off-resonant regime and the expansion are standard, we will add a new appendix in the revised manuscript comparing the effective model to the full light-matter Hamiltonian for small system sizes (N=4 and N=6) with photon truncation up to 3 photons. This will include comparisons of ground-state energies, edge correlation functions, and the location of phase boundaries to confirm that the topology in the effective model faithfully represents the cavity-coupled system. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim of 'excellent agreement' between winding number and Resta polarization (results section and phase-diagram figures) is load-bearing for the central conclusion but lacks quantitative support such as tabulated critical-point deviations, overlap integrals of phase regions, or error estimates across parameter scans.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative metrics would make the agreement more rigorous. In the revised manuscript, we will add a table in the results section (or supplementary material) reporting the deviations in critical points (e.g., the cavity coupling strength g at which the topological transition occurs) between the two markers, along with the overlap fraction of the identified topological regions across the scanned parameter space. This will provide explicit error estimates supporting the visual agreement in the phase diagrams. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard approximation and independent markers

full rationale

The derivation applies the high-frequency expansion (a standard external technique) to obtain an effective fermionic Hamiltonian, then evaluates it with three established topological markers (winding number from single-particle Green's function, Resta polarization, and edge correlation functions). These markers are applied independently to the same effective model; their agreement is a cross-check, not a definitional reduction. No self-citations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or ansatz smuggling appear in the load-bearing steps. The chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the validity of the high-frequency expansion in the off-resonant regime and on the assumption that the chosen markers correctly diagnose topology in the resulting interacting fermionic model.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption High-frequency expansion accurately yields an effective fermionic Hamiltonian with cavity-mediated interactions
    Invoked to obtain the model whose topology is then studied
  • domain assumption The three markers (edge correlations, Green's function winding number, Resta polarization) are valid for interacting systems
    Used to characterize the phase diagram

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5463 in / 1310 out tokens · 25794 ms · 2026-05-10T12:21:06.063875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Poor man's Majorana bound states in quantum dot based Kitaev chain coupled to a photonic cavity

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Cavity photons screen attractive or repulsive interactions in a quantum-dot Kitaev chain, allowing the system to reach the sweet spot for poor man's Majorana bound states.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Schlawin, D

    F. Schlawin, D. M. Kennes, and M. A. Sentef, Cavity quantum materials, Applied Physics Reviews9(2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    F. J. Garcia-Vidal, C. Ciuti, and T. W. Ebbesen, Ma- nipulating matter by strong coupling to vacuum fields, Science373, eabd0336 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Appugliese, J

    F. Appugliese, J. Enkner, G. L. Paravicini-Bagliani, M. Beck, C. Reichl, W. Wegscheider, G. Scalari, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Breakdown of topological protection by cav- ity vacuum fields in the integer quantum Hall effect, Sci- ence375, 1030 (2022)

    2022

  4. [4]

    Enkner, L

    J. Enkner, L. Graziotto, D. Bori¸ ci, F. Appugliese, C. Re- ichl, G. Scalari, N. Regnault, W. Wegscheider, C. Ciuti, and J. Faist, Tunable vacuum-field control of fractional and integer quantum Hall phases, Nature641, 884 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    G. Jarc, S. Y. Mathengattil, A. Montanaro, F. Giusti, E. M. Rigoni, R. Sergo, F. Fassioli, S. Winnerl, S. Dal Zilio, D. Mihailovic, P. Prelovˇ sek, M. Eckstein, and D. Fausti, Cavity-mediated thermal control of metal-to- insulator transition in 1T-TaS2, Nature622, 487 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Keren, T

    I. Keren, T. A. Webb, S. Zhang, J. Xu, D. Sun, B. S. Y. Kim, D. Shin, S. S. Zhang, J. Zhang, G. Pereira, J. Yao, T. Okugawa, M. H. Michael, E. Vi˜ nas Bostr¨ om, J. H. Edgar, S. Wolf, M. Julian, R. P. Prasankumar, K. Miya- gawa, K. Kanoda, G. Gu, M. Cothrine, D. Mandrus, M. Buzzi, A. Cavalleri, C. R. Dean, D. M. Kennes, A. J. Millis, Q. Li, M. A. Sentef, ...

    2026

  7. [7]

    Ciuti, Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum Hall systems, Phys

    C. Ciuti, Cavity-mediated electron hopping in disordered quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B104, 155307 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Winter and O

    L. Winter and O. Zilberberg, Fractional quantum Hall edge polaritons, Phys. Rev. B112, L241105 (2025)

    2025

  9. [9]

    Bori¸ ci, G

    D. Bori¸ ci, G. Arwas, and C. Ciuti, Cavity-modified quan- tum electron transport in multiterminal devices and in- terferometers, Phys. Rev. B112, 045301 (2025)

    2025

  10. [10]

    M. A. Sentef, M. Ruggenthaler, and A. Rubio, Cav- ity quantum-electrodynamical polaritonically enhanced electron-phonon coupling and its influence on supercon- ductivity, Science Advances4, eaau6969

  11. [11]

    Schlawin, A

    F. Schlawin, A. Cavalleri, and D. Jaksch, Cavity- mediated electron-photon superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 133602 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    J. B. Curtis, Z. M. Raines, A. A. Allocca, M. Hafezi, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity quantum Eliashberg enhance- ment of superconductivity, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 167002 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    A. A. Allocca, Z. M. Raines, J. B. Curtis, and V. M. Galitski, Cavity superconductor-polaritons, Phys. Rev. B99, 020504 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    V. K. Kozin, E. Thingstad, D. Loss, and J. Klinovaja, Cavity-enhanced superconductivity via band engineer- ing, Phys. Rev. B111, 035410 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Mazza and A

    G. Mazza and A. Georges, Superradiant quantum mate- rials, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 017401 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Passetti, C

    G. Passetti, C. J. Eckhardt, M. A. Sentef, and D. M. Kennes, Cavity light-matter entanglement through quan- tum fluctuations, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 023601 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    B. Kass, S. Talkington, A. Srivastava, and M. Claassen, Many-body photon blockade and quantum light generation from cavity quantum materials (2024), arXiv:2411.08964 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Nguyen, G

    D.-P. Nguyen, G. Arwas, Z. Lin, W. Yao, and C. Ciuti, Electron-photon Chern number in cavity-embedded 2D moir´ e materials, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 176602 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    Trif and Y

    M. Trif and Y. Tserkovnyak, Resonantly tunable Majo- rana polariton in a microwave cavity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 9 109, 257002 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    Cottet, T

    A. Cottet, T. Kontos, and B. Dou¸ cot, Squeezing light with Majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. B88, 195415 (2013)

    2013

  21. [21]

    F. P. M. M´ endez-C´ ordoba, J. J. Mendoza-Arenas, F. J. G´ omez-Ruiz, F. J. Rodr´ ıguez, C. Tejedor, and L. Quiroga, R´ enyi entropy singularities as signatures of topological criticality in coupled photon-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 043264 (2020)

    2020

  22. [22]

    L. C. Contamin, M. R. Delbecq, B. Dou¸ cot, A. Cot- tet, and T. Kontos, Hybrid light-matter networks of Ma- jorana zero modes, npj Quantum Information7, 171 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    Bacciconi, G

    Z. Bacciconi, G. M. Andolina, and C. Mora, Topological protection of Majorana polaritons in a cavity, Phys. Rev. B109, 165434 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schir` o, Hybrid light-matter states in topological superconductors coupled to cavity photons, Phys. Rev. B110, 075416 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Fernandez Becerra and O

    V. Fernandez Becerra and O. Dmytruk, Fermion parity switching in a short Kitaev chain coupled to a photonic cavity, Phys. Rev. B113, 165410 (2026)

    2026

  26. [26]

    Kobia lka, A

    A. Kobia lka, A. K. Ghosh, R. Arouca, and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Topology and energy dependence of Majorana bound states in a photonic cavity (2026), arXiv:2602.03553 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page arXiv 2026

  27. [27]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schir` o, Controlling topological phases of matter with quantum light, Communications Physics5, 271 (2022)

    2022

  28. [28]

    P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G

    B. P´ erez-Gonz´ alez, G. Platero, and A. Gomez-Le´ on, Light-matter correlations in quantum Floquet engineer- ing of cavity quantum materials, Quantum9, 1633 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Vlasiuk, V

    E. Vlasiuk, V. K. Kozin, J. Klinovaja, D. Loss, I. V. Iorsh, and I. V. Tokatly, Cavity-induced charge transfer in periodic systems: Length-gauge formalism, Phys. Rev. B108, 085410 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Nguyen, G

    D.-P. Nguyen, G. Arwas, and C. Ciuti, Electron conduc- tance and many-body marker of a cavity-embedded topo- logical one-dimensional chain, Phys. Rev. B110, 195416 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Shaffer, M

    D. Shaffer, M. Claassen, A. Srivastava, and L. H. Santos, Entanglement and topology in Su-Schrieffer-Heeger cav- ity quantum electrodynamics, Phys. Rev. B109, 155160 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Sueiro, G

    J. Sueiro, G. M. Andolina, and M. Schir` o, Floquet the- ory of lattice electrons coupled to an off-resonant cavity (2025), arXiv:2507.22715 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and superconductors, Reviews of Modern Physics83, 1057–1110 (2011)

    2011

  34. [34]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium: Topologi- cal insulators, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 3045–3067 (2010)

    2010

  35. [35]

    C.-K. Chiu, J. C. Y. Teo, A. P. Schnyder, and S. Ryu, Classification of topological quantum matter with sym- metries, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 035005 (2016)

    2016

  36. [36]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    2008

  37. [37]

    Kitaev, V

    A. Kitaev, V. Lebedev, and M. Feigel’man, Periodic table for topological insulators and superconductors, inAIP Conference Proceedings(AIP, 2009) p. 22–30

    2009

  38. [38]

    T. L. Hughes, E. Prodan, and B. A. Bernevig, Inversion- symmetric topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B83, 245132 (2011)

    2011

  39. [39]

    Song, S.-J

    H. Song, S.-J. Huang, L. Fu, and M. Hermele, Topological phases protected by point group symmetry, Phys. Rev. X7, 011020 (2017)

    2017

  40. [40]

    Fidkowski and A

    L. Fidkowski and A. Kitaev, Effects of interactions on the topological classification of free fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B81, 134509 (2010)

    2010

  41. [41]

    Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and inter- acting topological insulators, Phys

    V. Gurarie, Single-particle Green’s functions and inter- acting topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B83, 085426 (2011)

    2011

  42. [42]

    A. M. Essin and V. Gurarie, Bulk-boundary correspon- dence of topological insulators from their respective Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. B84, 125132 (2011)

    2011

  43. [43]

    S. R. Manmana, A. M. Essin, R. M. Noack, and V. Gurarie, Topological invariants and interacting one- dimensional fermionic systems, Phys. Rev. B86, 205119 (2012)

    2012

  44. [44]

    Wang and S.-C

    Z. Wang and S.-C. Zhang, Simplified topological invari- ants for interacting insulators, Phys. Rev. X2, 031008 (2012)

    2012

  45. [45]

    Tada, Quantized polarization in a generalized Rice- Mele model at arbitrary filling, Phys

    Y. Tada, Quantized polarization in a generalized Rice- Mele model at arbitrary filling, Phys. Rev. B110, 045113 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    del Pozo, L

    F. del Pozo, L. Herviou, and K. Le Hur, Fractional topology in interacting one-dimensional superconductors, Phys. Rev. B107, 155134 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Le Hur, Interacting topological quantum aspects with light and geometrical functions, Physics Reports1104, 1 (2025)

    K. Le Hur, Interacting topological quantum aspects with light and geometrical functions, Physics Reports1104, 1 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    1979

  49. [49]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P´ alyi,A short course on topological insulators, Vol. 919 (Springer, 2016)

    2016

  50. [50]

    Franke and F

    K. Franke and F. Oppen, Topological states engineered in narrow strips of graphene, Nature560, 175 (2018)

    2018

  51. [51]

    D. J. Rizzo, G. Veber, T. Cao, C. Bronner, T. Chen, F. Zhao, H. Rodriguez, S. G. Louie, M. F. Crommie, and F. R. Fischer, Topological band engineering of graphene nanoribbons, Nature560, 204–208 (2018)

    2018

  52. [52]

    Atala, M

    M. Atala, M. Aidelsburger, J. T. Barreiro, D. Abanin, T. Kitagawa, E. Demler, and I. Bloch, Direct measure- ment of the Zak phase in topological Bloch bands, Nature Physics9, 795–800 (2013)

    2013

  53. [53]

    E. J. Meier, F. A. An, and B. Gadway, Observation of the topological soliton state in the Su–Schrieffer–Heeger model, Nature Communications7, 13986 (2016)

    2016

  54. [54]

    C. H. Lee, S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical circuits, Communications Physics1, 39 (2018)

    2018

  55. [55]

    Mikami, S

    T. Mikami, S. Kitamura, K. Yasuda, N. Tsuji, T. Oka, and H. Aoki, Brillouin-Wigner theory for high-frequency expansion in periodically driven systems: Application to Floquet topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B93, 144307 (2016)

    2016

  56. [56]

    M. A. Sentef, J. Li, F. K¨ unzel, and M. Eckstein, Quantum to classical crossover of Floquet engineering in correlated quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033033 (2020)

    2020

  57. [57]

    Li and M

    J. Li and M. Eckstein, Manipulating intertwined orders in solids with quantum light, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 217402 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    J. Li, L. Schamriß, and M. Eckstein, Effective theory of lattice electrons strongly coupled to quantum electromag- 10 netic fields, Phys. Rev. B105, 165121 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    Resta, Quantum-mechanical position operator in ex- tended systems, Phys

    R. Resta, Quantum-mechanical position operator in ex- tended systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 1800 (1998)

    1998

  60. [60]

    G´ omez-Le´ on and G

    A. G´ omez-Le´ on and G. Platero, Floquet-Bloch theory and topology in periodically driven lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 200403 (2013)

    2013

  61. [61]

    Fuchs and F

    J.-N. Fuchs and F. Pi´ echon, Orbital embedding and topology of one-dimensional two-band insulators, Phys. Rev. B104, 235428 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    Cayssol and J

    J. Cayssol and J. N. Fuchs, Topological and geometrical aspects of band theory, Journal of Physics: Materials4, 034007 (2021)

    2021

  63. [63]

    Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys

    J. Zak, Berry’s phase for energy bands in solids, Phys. Rev. Lett.62, 2747 (1989)

    1989

  64. [64]

    Fuchs and F

    J.-N. Fuchs and F. Pi´ echon, Does the SSH model describe a topological insulator?, arXiv:2106.03595v1 (2021)

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [65]

    R. D. King-Smith and D. Vanderbilt, Theory of polariza- tion of crystalline solids, Phys. Rev. B47, 1651 (1993)

    1993

  66. [66]

    In this case,Pcan change by 1/2 if one shifts the lattice by half a unit cell [61, 64]

    Typically, the ionic background can be chosen as having a +1/2 charged ion located at each lattice site [61, 64]. In this case,Pcan change by 1/2 if one shifts the lattice by half a unit cell [61, 64]. Here, we consider that our unit cell choice is fixed by the open boundary conditions and half-unit-cell translations are not allowed. ()

  67. [67]

    Dmytruk and M

    O. Dmytruk and M. Schir´ o, Gauge fixing for strongly correlated electrons coupled to quantum light, Phys. Rev. B103, 075131 (2021)

    2021

  68. [68]

    Pilar, D

    P. Pilar, D. De Bernardis, and P. Rabl, Thermodynamics of ultrastrongly coupled light-matter systems, Quantum 4, 335 (2020)

    2020

  69. [69]

    ForL= 3,4,5, we verified that the difference in the electron-electron correlations computed withN c = 5 and a largerN c = 10 are maximally of order of 10 −10

    The full light-matter Hilbert space grows as 22L×(Nc+1) where the first factor acocunts for the electronic Fock space dimension (by fixing the electron occupation to half filling, it reduces to 2L L ) and the second factor to the photonic Fock space dimension. ForL= 3,4,5, we verified that the difference in the electron-electron correlations computed with...

  70. [70]

    Defossez, L

    A. Defossez, L. Vanderstraeten, L. Peralta Gavensky, and N. Goldman, Dynamic realization of Majorana zero modes in a particle-conserving ladder, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 023183 (2025)

    2025

  71. [71]

    Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet, Vol

    G. Volovik,The Universe in a Helium Droplet, Vol. 117 (2003)

    2003

  72. [72]

    M. R. Zirnbauer, Particle–hole symmetries in condensed matter, Journal of Mathematical Physics62(2021)

    2021

  73. [73]

    S. S. Pershoguba and V. M. Yakovenko, Shockley model description of surface states in topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B86, 075304 (2012)

    2012

  74. [74]

    Bardyn, L

    C.-E. Bardyn, L. Wawer, A. Altland, M. Fleischhauer, and S. Diehl, Probing the topology of density matrices, Phys. Rev. X8, 011035 (2018)

    2018

  75. [75]

    Molignini and N

    P. Molignini and N. R. Cooper, Topological phase tran- sitions at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Res.5, 023004 (2023)

    2023

  76. [76]

    Huang and S

    Z.-M. Huang and S. Diehl, Interaction-induced topolog- ical phase transition at finite temperature, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 053002 (2025)

    2025

  77. [77]

    J. D. Hannukainen and N. R. Cooper, Charac- terizing topology at nonzero temperature (2025), arXiv:2512.00464 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Gilardoni, F

    I. Gilardoni, F. Becca, A. Marrazzo, and A. Parola, Real- space many-body marker for correlated𭟋 2 topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B106, L161106 (2022)

    2022

  79. [79]

    Resta, Geometry and topology in many-body physics (2020), arXiv:2006.15567 [cond-mat.str-el]

    R. Resta, Geometry and topology in many-body physics (2020), arXiv:2006.15567 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Watanabe and M

    H. Watanabe and M. Oshikawa, Inequivalent berry phases for the bulk polarization, Physical Review X8, 10.1103/physrevx.8.021065 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.021065 2018