arxiv: 2604.14112 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: unknown

Gravitational Sommerfeld Effects: Formalism, Renormalization, and Perturbation to O(G¹⁰)

Chih-Hao Chang , Chia-Hsien Shen , Zihan Zhou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.HEgr-qchep-ph

keywords Sommerfeld factortail effectsgravitational waveformseffective field theorybinary inspiralsrenormalization groupMano-Suzuki-Takasugi methodpost-Minkowskian expansion

0 comments

The pith

The phase of the gravitational Sommerfeld factor equals the elastic Compton scattering phase shift exactly when tidal dissipation is absent.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a worldline EFT framework to compute the Sommerfeld factor that resums tail effects in gravitational waveforms from binary inspirals, including tidal contributions from the bodies. It recasts the infinite series of diagrams as the solution to a d-dimensional wave equation sourced at the worldlines, producing a closed-form Sommerfeld factor expressed through the EFT connection matrix. The authors prove that the phase of this factor coincides with the phase shift of elastic Compton scattering in the absence of dissipation, compute explicit analytic expressions for both magnitude and phase through tenth order in G for the lowest three partial waves, and derive a new renormalization-group equation for the radiative multipole moments whose solution improves the resummation of waveform tails past the universal logarithms.

Core claim

In the effective field theory description of binary inspirals, the radiated gravitational waveform receives universal corrections from the curved background, the so-called tail effects, that resum into the so-called Sommerfeld factor. We develop a systematic framework for computing this gravitational Sommerfeld factor for scalar perturbations with the presence of tidal effects on the system. Using the worldline EFT, we recast the diagrammatic resummation as a solution to the d-dimensional wave equation with a localized source, and derive a closed-form expression for the Sommerfeld factor in terms of the EFT connection matrix. We prove that the phase of the Sommerfeld factor is exactly the sa

What carries the argument

The EFT connection matrix obtained by solving the d-dimensional wave equation with a localized source, which encodes the resummation of tail effects into the Sommerfeld factor.

If this is right

Explicit analytic forms for the Sommerfeld magnitude and phase to O(G^{10}) for ℓ = 0, 1, 2 waves supply high-precision inputs for post-Minkowskian waveform templates.
The exact phase equivalence reduces the computational burden for non-dissipative cases by importing known Compton scattering results.
The new renormalization-group equation for radiative multipole moments produces a resummed waveform that includes corrections beyond the universal tail logarithms.
The closed-form connection-matrix expression allows systematic inclusion of tidal effects in the tail resummation for inspiraling binaries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The analytic O(G^{10}) results could serve as benchmarks for validating numerical relativity codes at high post-Minkowskian orders.
The RG resummation technique may extend to vector or tensor perturbations and to systems with spin, broadening its use for realistic compact-object binaries.
The link between Sommerfeld phases and Compton scattering phases hints at a deeper correspondence that could be exploited in quantum-field-theoretic treatments of gravitational scattering.

Load-bearing premise

The worldline EFT description remains valid for the binary system with tidal effects included, and the d-dimensional wave equation with localized source fully captures the diagrammatic resummation of tail effects.

What would settle it

A direct perturbative computation of the Sommerfeld factor phase to O(G^3) or higher via Feynman diagrams for a non-dissipative scalar perturbation, compared against the known elastic Compton phase shift at the same order, would confirm or refute the phase equivalence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14112 by Chia-Hsien Shen, Chih-Hao Chang, Zihan Zhou.

read the original abstract

In the effective field theory (EFT) description of binary inspirals, the radiated gravitational waveform receives universal corrections from the curved background, the so-called ``tail effects'', that resum into the so-called ``Sommerfeld factor''. We develop a systematic framework for computing this gravitational Sommerfeld factor for scalar perturbations with the presence of tidal effects on the system. Using the worldline EFT, we recast the diagrammatic resummation as a solution to the $d$-dimensional wave equation with a localized source, and derive a closed-form expression for the Sommerfeld factor in terms of the EFT connection matrix. We prove that the phase of the Sommerfeld factor is exactly the same as elastic Compton scattering phase shift when there is no tidal dissipation. By combining the renormalization techniques in EFT with the Mano--Suzuki--Takasugi method in black hole perturbation theory, we analytically solve the Sommerfeld factor for both the magnitude and phase to $O(G^{10})$ for the $\ell = 0, 1, 2$ partial waves. We further establish a new renormalization group equation for the radiative multipole moments, whose exact solution yields an improved resummation of the waveform beyond the universal tail logarithms. These high-precision data and exact relations pave the way for future waveform resummation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper maps tail resummation to a d-dimensional wave equation via worldline EFT, delivers O(G^10) analytic Sommerfeld factors for low partial waves, proves an exact phase match to Compton scattering without dissipation, and introduces a new RG equation for radiative multipoles.

read the letter

The core advance is the recasting of diagrammatic tail effects as the solution to a sourced wave equation whose connection matrix comes from worldline EFT. This yields closed-form Sommerfeld factors, an exact phase equality to elastic Compton scattering when tidal dissipation is absent, explicit O(G^10) results for ℓ=0,1,2, and a new RG equation whose solution improves resummation past the usual tail logarithms. The combination of EFT renormalization with the MST method is what lets them reach those orders analytically for scalar perturbations with tides included. That is concrete and new relative to prior tail work. The phase relation is a clean exact statement that could simplify checks in other calculations. The RG flow for multipoles is a direct extension that goes beyond universal logs and looks reproducible from the stated setup. The construction treats the source as localized in d dimensions, which matches standard EFT practice for these operators and appears to hold without extra non-local terms spoiling the phase or the RG. The results stay within scalar perturbations, so they are not yet full tensor waveforms, but the framework is set up to plug in. Soft spots are minor: the analytic expressions are given for low ℓ only, and practical waveform impact still requires matching to the rest of the post-Newtonian or numerical pieces. No obvious circularity or free parameters appear in the claims. This is aimed at people building high-precision gravitational-wave templates who need better analytic control over tails. Readers working on EFT resummation or black-hole perturbation methods will get direct value from the O(G^10) data and the RG improvement. The paper has enough new structure and verifiable results to deserve a serious referee rather than a desk reject. I would send it for peer review and ask the referees to check the phase-equality derivation and the explicit RG solution.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a systematic worldline EFT framework for the gravitational Sommerfeld factor in scalar perturbations including tidal effects. It recasts diagrammatic tail resummation as the solution to a d-dimensional wave equation with localized source, yielding a closed-form expression in terms of the EFT connection matrix. The paper proves that the phase of the Sommerfeld factor equals the elastic Compton scattering phase shift in the absence of tidal dissipation, analytically computes both magnitude and phase to O(G^{10}) for ℓ=0,1,2 partial waves by combining EFT renormalization with the Mano-Suzuki-Takahashi method, and derives a new renormalization group equation for radiative multipole moments whose solution improves waveform resummation beyond universal tail logarithms.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work supplies valuable high-order analytic results and exact relations for tail effects that can directly inform waveform modeling and resummation techniques in gravitational-wave physics. The combination of EFT methods with black-hole perturbation theory, the phase equality, and the new RG equation for multipoles represent concrete advances that go beyond existing logarithmic resummations and provide falsifiable, high-precision data for low partial waves.

major comments (2)

[§3.1] §3.1, around Eq. (8)–(12): The central step equating the Sommerfeld factor to the solution of the d-dimensional wave equation sourced by the worldline EFT connection matrix is load-bearing for both the closed-form expression and the exact phase-equality proof. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that tidal operators (including those with dissipation) produce only localized sources in d dimensions and that the regularization procedure captures all finite pieces affecting the phase; otherwise the claimed exact relation to the Compton phase shift does not follow.
[§5] §5, the O(G^{10}) results for ℓ=0,1,2: While the abstract states analytic solutions are obtained, the explicit expressions, the precise truncation of the MST series, and the error estimates from omitted higher-order terms in the renormalization should be displayed (or at least summarized in a table) so that the claimed O(G^{10}) accuracy can be verified independently.

minor comments (2)

The definition and components of the EFT connection matrix are introduced without a compact summary table; adding one would improve readability when the matrix is used in later sections.
A few instances of inconsistent notation appear between the wave-equation source term and the multipole-moment RG equation; these should be aligned for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and explicit results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.1] §3.1, around Eq. (8)–(12): The central step equating the Sommerfeld factor to the solution of the d-dimensional wave equation sourced by the worldline EFT connection matrix is load-bearing for both the closed-form expression and the exact phase-equality proof. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate that tidal operators (including those with dissipation) produce only localized sources in d dimensions and that the regularization procedure captures all finite pieces affecting the phase; otherwise the claimed exact relation to the Compton phase shift does not follow.

Authors: We agree that this central step requires explicit verification to support the closed-form expression and phase-equality proof. In the worldline EFT, tidal operators are by construction localized at the particle worldline; upon analytic continuation to d dimensions they remain strictly delta-function sources. Dimensional regularization subtracts only the ultraviolet divergences while retaining all finite contributions to the phase, which are encoded in the connection matrix. To address the referee's request directly, we have added a new paragraph immediately after Eq. (12) that derives the localization property for both conservative and dissipative tidal operators and confirms that no non-local sources are generated. This addition makes the argument self-contained without altering any results. revision: yes
Referee: [§5] §5, the O(G^{10}) results for ℓ=0,1,2: While the abstract states analytic solutions are obtained, the explicit expressions, the precise truncation of the MST series, and the error estimates from omitted higher-order terms in the renormalization should be displayed (or at least summarized in a table) so that the claimed O(G^{10}) accuracy can be verified independently.

Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting the need for greater transparency in the high-order results. In the revised manuscript we have added a new Table 1 in Section 5 that tabulates the explicit analytic expressions for both magnitude and phase of the Sommerfeld factor for ℓ = 0, 1, 2 through O(G^{10}). The table also records the precise truncation of the MST series (retaining terms up to n = 10) and supplies error estimates showing that omitted higher-order renormalization contributions begin at O(G^{11}), which lies outside the claimed accuracy. These additions enable independent verification while leaving the computed values unchanged. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation builds on independent EFT and perturbation techniques

full rationale

The paper recasts diagrammatic tail resummation as a d-dimensional wave equation sourced by the worldline EFT connection matrix, derives a closed-form Sommerfeld factor, proves phase equivalence to Compton scattering without dissipation, solves analytically to O(G^10) via MST method for low partial waves, and establishes a new RG equation for radiative multipoles. None of these steps reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations; the central claims rest on standard renormalization and black-hole perturbation methods applied to the recast equation, with the framework remaining self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the validity of the worldline EFT for inspiraling binaries with tidal effects and on the equivalence between diagrammatic resummation and the sourced wave equation in d dimensions. No free parameters, invented entities, or additional axioms are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Worldline EFT provides a valid description of binary inspirals including tidal effects
Invoked to recast the Sommerfeld factor computation and to include tidal contributions.
domain assumption The d-dimensional wave equation with localized source captures the full diagrammatic resummation of tail effects
Used to derive the closed-form expression in terms of the EFT connection matrix.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1598 out tokens · 60049 ms · 2026-05-10T12:57:47.120198+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

But when there is a hierarchyµ/µ0 ≫O(1), the contribu- tions from tides become important

as the tidal response dependence cancels out. But when there is a hierarchyµ/µ0 ≫O(1), the contribu- tions from tides become important. Resummation Proposal— The exact solutions of the RG equations (24) suggest an improved tail resummation in our scalar model. As noted in [38], the Sommerfeld factorS ℓcoincides with the tail resummation factorTℓ in the fa...
[2]

Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves

L. Blanchet, Post-Newtonian Theory for Gravitational Waves, Living Rev. Rel.17, 2 (2014), arXiv:1310.1528 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[3]

Futamase and Y

T. Futamase and Y. Itoh, The post-Newtonian approxi- mation for relativistic compact binaries, Living Rev. Rel. 10, 2 (2007)

2007
[4]

Poisson and C

E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, post- newtonian, relativistic(Cambridge University Press, 2014)

2014
[5]

Blanchet and T

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Radiative gravitational fields in general relativity I. general structure of the field outside the source, Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. A320, 379 (1986)

1986
[6]

Blanchet, Gravitational wave tails of tails, Class

L. Blanchet, Gravitational wave tails of tails, Class. Quant. Grav.15, 113 (1998), [Erratum: Class.Quant.Grav. 22, 3381 (2005)], arXiv:gr- qc/9710038

work page arXiv 1998
[7]

W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects, Phys. Rev. D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[8]

W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Dissipative effects in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics, Phys. Rev. D73, 104030 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0511133

work page arXiv 2006
[9]

R. A. Porto, The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics, Phys. Rept.633, 1 (2016), arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[10]

S. Mano, H. Suzuki, and E. Takasugi, Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their low frequency ex- pansions, Prog. Theor. Phys.95, 1079 (1996), arXiv:gr- qc/9603020

work page arXiv 1996
[11]

Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their properties,

S. Mano and E. Takasugi, Analytic solutions of the Teukolsky equation and their properties, Prog. Theor. Phys.97, 213 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9611014

work page arXiv 1997
[12]

Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, and T. Tanaka, Gravitational radia- tion reaction to a particle motion, Phys. Rev. D55, 3457 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9606018

work page arXiv 1997
[13]

Y. Mino, M. Sasaki, M. Shibata, H. Tagoshi, and T. Tanaka, Black hole perturbation: Chapter 1, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.128, 1 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9712057

work page arXiv 1997
[14]

Rel.6 6 [arXiv:gr-qc/0306120]

M. Sasaki and H. Tagoshi, Analytic black hole pertur- bation approach to gravitational radiation, Living Rev. Rel.6, 6 (2003), arXiv:gr-qc/0306120

work page arXiv 2003
[15]

T. C. Quinn and R. M. Wald, An Axiomatic approach to electromagnetic and gravitational radiation reaction of particles in curved space-time, Phys. Rev. D56, 3381 (1997), arXiv:gr-qc/9610053

work page arXiv 1997
[16]

The motion of point particles in curved spacetime

E. Poisson, A. Pound, and I. Vega, The Motion of point particles in curved spacetime, Living Rev. Rel.14, 7 (2011), arXiv:1102.0529 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[17]

Self-force and radiation reaction in general relativity

L. Barack and A. Pound, Self-force and radiation reac- tion in general relativity, Rept. Prog. Phys.82, 016904 (2019), arXiv:1805.10385 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[18]

From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, From Scat- tering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post- Minkowskian Expansion, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[19]

D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, Ampli- 7 tudes, Observables, and Classical Scattering, JHEP02, 137, arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[20]

Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

Z. Bern, C. Cheung, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Black Hole Binary Dynamics from the Double Copy and Effective Theory, JHEP10, 206, arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 1908
[22]

Effective one-body approach to general relativistic two-body dynamics

A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Effective one-body ap- proach to general relativistic two-body dynamics, Phys. Rev. D59, 084006 (1999), arXiv:gr-qc/9811091

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[23]

Buonanno and T

A. Buonanno and T. Damour, Transition from inspiral to plunge in binary black hole coalescences, Phys. Rev. D62, 064015 (2000), arXiv:gr-qc/0001013

work page arXiv 2000
[24]

Coalescence of two spinning black holes: an effective one-body approach,

T. Damour, Coalescence of two spinning black holes: an effective one-body approach, Phys. Rev. D64, 124013 (2001), arXiv:gr-qc/0103018

work page arXiv 2001
[25]

Pretorius,Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys

F. Pretorius, Evolution of binary black hole spacetimes, Phys.Rev.Lett.95,121101(2005),arXiv:gr-qc/0507014

work page arXiv 2005
[26]

T. W. Baumgarte and S. L. Shapiro,Numerical Relativ- ity: Solving Einstein ’s Equations on the Computer(Cam- bridge University Press, 2010)

2010
[27]

B. S. DeWitt and R. W. Brehme, Radiation damping in a gravitational field, Annals Phys.9, 220 (1960)

1960
[28]

Blanchet and T

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Tail Transported Temporal Correlations in the Dynamics of a Gravitating System, Phys. Rev. D37, 1410 (1988)

1988
[29]

Blanchet and T

L. Blanchet and T. Damour, Hereditary effects in gravi- tational radiation, Phys. Rev. D46, 4304 (1992)

1992
[30]

Blanchet, Time asymmetric structure of gravitational radiation, Phys

L. Blanchet, Time asymmetric structure of gravitational radiation, Phys. Rev. D47, 4392 (1993)

1993
[31]

W. D. Goldberger and A. Ross, Gravitational radiative corrections from effective field theory, Phys. Rev. D81, 124015 (2010), arXiv:0912.4254 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2010
[32]

W. D. Goldberger, A. Ross, and I. Z. Rothstein, Black holemassdynamicsandrenormalizationgroupevolution, Phys. Rev. D89, 124033 (2014), arXiv:1211.6095 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2014
[33]

G. L. Almeida, S. Foffa, and R. Sturani, Gravitational multipole renormalization, Phys. Rev. D104, 084095 (2021), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 111, 129901 (2025)], arXiv:2107.02634 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[34]

Damour and A

T. Damour and A. Nagar, Faithful effective-one-body waveforms of small-mass-ratio coalescing black-hole bi- naries, Phys. Rev. D76, 064028 (2007), arXiv:0705.2519 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2007
[35]

Comparing Effective-One-Body gravitational waveforms to accurate numerical data

T. Damour and A. Nagar, Comparing Effective-One- Body gravitational waveforms to accurate numerical data, Phys. Rev. D77, 024043 (2008), arXiv:0711.2628 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[36]

Damour, B

T. Damour, B. R. Iyer, and A. Nagar, Improved resum- mation of post-Newtonian multipolar waveforms from circularized compact binaries, Phys. Rev. D79, 064004 (2009), arXiv:0811.2069 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2009
[37]

Y. Pan, A. Buonanno, M. Boyle, L. T. Buchman, L. E. Kidder, H. P. Pfeiffer, and M. A. Scheel, Inspiral-merger- ringdown multipolar waveforms of nonspinning black- hole binaries using the effective-one-body formalism, Phys. Rev. D84, 124052 (2011), arXiv:1106.1021 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2011
[38]

Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved accuracy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing binary black holes, Phys

L. Pompiliet al., Laying the foundation of the effective- one-body waveform models SEOBNRv5: Improved ac- curacy and efficiency for spinning nonprecessing bi- nary black holes, Phys. Rev. D108, 124035 (2023), arXiv:2303.18039 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[39]

M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Resummation of Universal Tails in Gravita- tional Waveforms, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 141401 (2025), arXiv:2504.07862 [hep-th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[40]

Cipriani, A

A. Cipriani, A. Nagar, F. Fucito, and J. F. Morales, From the confluent Heun equation to a new factorized and resummed gravitational waveform for circularized, nonspinning,compactbinaries, (2026),arXiv:2602.08833 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[41]

Correia and G

M. Correia and G. Isabella, The Born regime of gravita- tional amplitudes, JHEP03, 144, arXiv:2406.13737 [hep- th]

work page arXiv
[42]

Gravitational Wave Scattering via the Born Series: Scalar Tidal Matching to O(G7) and Beyond,

S. Caron-Huot, M. Correia, G. Isabella, and M. Solon, GravitationalWaveScatteringviatheBornSeries:Scalar Tidal Matching toO(G7)and Beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 191601 (2025), arXiv:2503.13593 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[43]

Chang, C.-H

C.-H. Chang, C.-H. Shen, and Z. Zhou, Sommerfeld_data (2026), github.com/ZihanZhou26/Sommerfeld_data

2026
[44]

Fucito, J

F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, and R. Russo, Gravitational wave forms for extreme mass ratio collisions from su- persymmetric gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D111, 044054 (2025), arXiv:2408.07329 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[45]

Cipriani, G

A. Cipriani, G. Di Russo, F. Fucito, J. F. Morales, H. Poghosyan, and R. Poghossian, Resumming post- Minkowskian and post-Newtonian gravitational wave- form expansions, SciPost Phys.19, 057 (2025), arXiv:2501.19257 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Cipriani, F

A. Cipriani, F. Fucito, C. Heissenberg, J. F. Morales, and R. Russo, ”Waveforms” at the Horizon, (2026), arXiv:2602.05766 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[47]

Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes,

O. Combaluzier-Szteinsznaider, D. Glazer, A. Joyce, M. J. Rodriguez, and L. Santoni, Dynamical Tidal Response of Schwarzschild Black Holes, (2025), arXiv:2511.02372 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Dynamical Tidal Response of Non-rotating Black Holes: Connecting the MST Formalism and Worldline EFT

H. Kobayashi, S. Mukohyama, N. Oshita, K. Takahashi, and V. Yingcharoenrat, Dynamical tidal response of nonrotating black holes: Connecting the Mano-Suzuki- Takasugi formalism and worldline EFT, Phys. Rev. D 113, 084011 (2026), arXiv:2511.12580 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[49]

Kosmopoulos, D

D. Kosmopoulos, D. Perrone, and M. Solon, Dynamical Love Numbers for Black Holes and Beyond from Shell Effective Field Theory, (2025), arXiv:2512.04002 [hep- th]

work page arXiv 2025
[50]

Y. F. Bautista, M. Driesse, K. Haddad, and G. U. Jakob- sen, Gravitational Wave Scattering in Spinless WQFT, (2026), arXiv:2602.06125 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[51]

N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, C. Jordan Eriksen, and N. Shah, The gravitational Compton amplitude at third post-Minkowskian order, (2026), arXiv:2602.06947 [hep- th]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[52]

M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Gravitational Raman Scattering: a Systematic Toolkit for Tidal Effects in General Relativity, (2026), arXiv:2602.06951 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2026
[53]

Correia, T

M. Correia, T. Gopalka, G. Isabella, and A. M. Wolz, Analyticity of the Black Hole S-Matrix, (2025), arXiv:2511.11794 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

M. M. Ivanov, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez, and Z. Zhou, Gravitational Raman Scattering in Effective Field The- ory: A Scalar Tidal Matching at O(G3), Phys. Rev. 1 Lett.132, 131401 (2024), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 134, 159901 (2025)], arXiv:2401.08752 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[55]

Effective Field Theory for Extreme Mass Ratio Binaries,

C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, Effective Field Theory for Ex- treme Mass Ratio Binaries, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 091402 (2024), arXiv:2308.14832 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2024
[56]

Kosmopoulos and M

D. Kosmopoulos and M. P. Solon, Gravitational self force from scattering amplitudes in curved space, JHEP03, 125, arXiv:2308.15304 [hep-th]

work page arXiv
[57]

Cheung, J

C. Cheung, J. Parra-Martinez, I. Z. Rothstein, N. Shah, and J. Wilson-Gerow, Gravitational scattering and be- yondfromextrememassratioeffectivefieldtheory,JHEP 10, 005, arXiv:2406.14770 [hep-th]. Supplemental Material DET AILS ON THE EQUA TION OF MOTION In this appendix, we provide the explicit form of the wave equation and the potentials appearing therei...

work page arXiv 2025