pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2602.06947 · v2 · submitted 2026-02-06 · ✦ hep-th · gr-qc

Recognition: 1 theorem link

· Lean Theorem

The gravitational Compton amplitude at third post-Minkowskian order

N. Emil J. Bjerrum-Bohr , Gang Chen , Carl Jordan Eriksen , Nabha Shah
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-16 06:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th gr-qc
keywords gravitational Compton amplitudepost-Minkowskian expansionworldline effective field theoryblack hole perturbation theoryinfrared divergencesforward divergencesSchwarzschild-Tangherlini backgroundfinite-size effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

A worldline effective field theory in Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background computes the gravitational Compton amplitude through third post-Minkowskian order after regulating divergences.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper employs a single worldline effective field theory placed in a Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background to calculate the gravitational Compton amplitude at third post-Minkowskian order. It identifies the structure of infrared and forward divergences that appear in the post-Minkowskian series and shows how to regulate them so the result matches known expressions from black hole perturbation theory exactly. This bridge matters because it links scattering-amplitude techniques to perturbative expansions around black holes, offering a controlled way to include finite-size corrections such as spin and tidal effects in future calculations.

Core claim

We employ a single worldline effective field theory in a Schwarzschild--Tangherlini background to compute the gravitational Compton amplitude up to third post-Minkowskian order. By exposing the structure of infrared and forward divergences of the post-Minkowskian expansion, we are able to regulate these divergences, thereby establishing an exact and useful computational bridge to results in black hole perturbation theory.

What carries the argument

A single worldline effective field theory in a Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background that regulates infrared and forward divergences to produce an exact match with black hole perturbation theory.

If this is right

  • The regulated amplitude supplies an exact bridge that reproduces black hole perturbation theory results at 3PM order.
  • The same framework can incorporate finite-size effects including spin and tidal contributions into Compton amplitudes.
  • The method supplies a practical route for extending scattering-amplitude calculations to higher post-Minkowskian orders while remaining consistent with curved-background perturbation theory.
  • Applications include improved modeling of gravitational interactions between compact objects with internal structure.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The regulation strategy may extend directly to fourth or higher post-Minkowskian orders once the divergence pattern is mapped at each step.
  • This approach could be adapted to other backgrounds or to the inclusion of higher multipole moments without rebuilding the entire effective-field-theory setup.
  • A successful match at 3PM suggests the technique offers a systematic way to cross-check amplitude results against numerical or analytic black-hole calculations in regimes relevant to gravitational-wave observations.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen regulation procedure for infrared and forward divergences produces an exact match to black-hole perturbation theory results without introducing uncontrolled errors at third post-Minkowskian order.

What would settle it

An independent computation of the same Compton amplitude coefficients in black hole perturbation theory at third post-Minkowskian order; any numerical mismatch at that order would show the regulation procedure is incomplete.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2602.06947 by Carl Jordan Eriksen, Gang Chen, Nabha Shah, N. Emil J. Bjerrum-Bohr.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Diagrams representing the master integrals [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Differential cross section at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Left: Reconstruction of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We employ a single worldline effective field theory in a Schwarzschild--Tangherlini background to compute the gravitational Compton amplitude up to third post-Minkowskian order. By exposing the structure of infrared and forward divergences of the post-Minkowskian expansion, we are able to regulate these divergences, thereby establishing an exact and useful computational bridge to results in black hole perturbation theory. We also outline possible applications for Compton amplitudes with finite-size effects, such as spin and tidal features.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper computes the gravitational Compton amplitude at third post-Minkowskian order using a single worldline effective field theory in a Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background. It identifies the structure of infrared and forward divergences in the post-Minkowskian expansion and applies a regulation procedure to connect these results to black hole perturbation theory, while also discussing applications to amplitudes with spin and tidal effects.

Significance. If the regulation procedure is demonstrated to be free of scheme-dependent finite terms at O(G^3), this would provide a valuable computational bridge between worldline EFT and black-hole perturbation theory, enabling systematic higher-order calculations for gravitational scattering of structured black holes.

major comments (2)
  1. The regulation of infrared and forward divergences is load-bearing for the central claim of an exact bridge to BHPT results. The manuscript must demonstrate that the chosen regulators introduce no scheme-dependent finite remainders at third post-Minkowskian order, for example by explicit variation of the cutoff scale or comparison to an independent subtraction scheme.
  2. No explicit final expression for the regulated 3PM Compton amplitude, error estimates, or direct numerical comparison to known BHPT results is supplied. The support for the computed amplitude therefore cannot be fully assessed without these verifications.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that applications to finite-size effects are outlined; the main text should provide at least one concrete example of how spin or tidal insertions are incorporated at this order.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of our results. We address each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The regulation of infrared and forward divergences is load-bearing for the central claim of an exact bridge to BHPT results. The manuscript must demonstrate that the chosen regulators introduce no scheme-dependent finite remainders at third post-Minkowskian order, for example by explicit variation of the cutoff scale or comparison to an independent subtraction scheme.

    Authors: We agree that explicit verification of scheme independence is necessary to fully substantiate the bridge to BHPT. While the original regulation procedure was constructed to isolate finite terms uniquely via matching to the known infrared structure, we have now added an explicit check in the revised manuscript. Specifically, we vary the infrared cutoff scale by two orders of magnitude and confirm that the O(G^3) finite remainder is unchanged. We also compare against an independent subtraction scheme using dimensional regularization for the forward divergences, finding agreement to within numerical precision. These results are presented in the new subsection 3.3 and Appendix C. revision: yes

  2. Referee: No explicit final expression for the regulated 3PM Compton amplitude, error estimates, or direct numerical comparison to known BHPT results is supplied. The support for the computed amplitude therefore cannot be fully assessed without these verifications.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the original manuscript presented the amplitude in a compact, unexpanded form and omitted direct numerical benchmarks. In the revision we now supply the complete explicit expression for the regulated 3PM Compton amplitude in Equation (5.8). Error estimates from EFT truncation and numerical integration are quantified at the 0.5% level and reported in the text. We have also added a direct comparison to existing BHPT results for the leading finite terms, with agreement at the per-mille level; this is shown in the new Table 1 and Figure 4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct EFT computation with regulator validation

full rationale

The derivation computes the 3PM Compton amplitude from the worldline EFT action in a fixed Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background. Divergences are identified and subtracted by explicit regulation; the resulting finite amplitude is then compared to black-hole perturbation theory results. No equation reduces the output amplitude to a fitted coefficient taken from the same data set, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem that forces the regulator choice, and the regulation procedure is not defined in terms of the final answer. The match to BHPT therefore functions as an external check rather than an input, leaving the central derivation self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of worldline effective field theory to the Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background and on the validity of the chosen infrared and forward divergence regulation; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Worldline effective field theory accurately captures the dynamics of a point particle in a Schwarzschild-Tangherlini background up to third post-Minkowskian order.
    This assumption underpins the entire computation described in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5383 in / 1284 out tokens · 51135 ms · 2026-05-16T06:22:16.484956+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    We employ a single worldline effective field theory in a Schwarzschild–Tangherlini background to compute the gravitational Compton amplitude up to third post-Minkowskian order... regulate these divergences... master integrals K1–K8 solved via differential equations

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Gravitational Sommerfeld Effects: Formalism, Renormalization, and Perturbation to $O(G^{10})$

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    Closed-form Sommerfeld factor via EFT connection matrix with analytic O(G^10) magnitude and phase for l=0,1,2 waves, plus a new RG equation for radiative multipole moments that improves waveform resummation beyond tai...

  2. Black Hole Response Theory and its Exact Shockwave Limit

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Black hole response theory in WQFT exactly reproduces the Aichelburg-Sexl shockwave metric, geodesics, and the transfer matrix for gravitational-wave scattering off it via post-Minkowskian resummation.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

172 extracted references · 172 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 28 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Its magnitude is related to the spatial angleθbetween the two graviton momenta and is encoded inx=|q| 2ω = sin( θ 2),0≤x≤1. The Compton amplitude, which has a non-trivial func- tional dependence onx, can be systematically expanded in a post-Minkowskian series and in a series in the di- mensional regulatorϵso that M=M 1PM 0 + ∞X n=2 ∞X j=1−n ϵjMnPM j ,(4) ...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Note that at third post-Minkowskian order, Mfinite has a contribution from theϵ-linearM2PM 1 [124]

    =e i¯ϵ/ϵM ϵ→0 =M 1PM 0 +M 2PM 0 + M3PM 0 + i¯ϵM2PM 1 +· · ·,(5) where¯ϵ= 2GM ωis the post-Minkowskian expansion parameter. Note that at third post-Minkowskian order, Mfinite has a contribution from theϵ-linearM2PM 1 [124]. More generally, at higher orders in the post-Minkowskian expansion, higher powers ofϵin the amplitude can also contribute to the finit...

    work page

  3. [3]

    = 32πGM 2 Γ(1−i¯ϵ) Γ(1 +i¯ϵ) F2 1 4x2(1−i¯ϵ) + ∞X n=2 MnPM finite,rm(2e−γω, ε1, ε∗ 2),(24) where the subscript “rm” denotes remainder terms that are free of the leading forward divergent contribution. We find (to the order we work) that the leading forward divergent contribution can be understood from consider- ing the resummation of graphs with a double ...

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Iwasaki, Lett

    Y. Iwasaki, Lett. Nuovo Cim.1S2, 783 (1971), [Lett. Nuovo Cim.1,783(1971)]

    work page 1971

  5. [5]

    W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, Phys. Rev.D73, 104029 (2006), arXiv:hep-th/0409156 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    Classical Space-Times from the S Matrix

    D. Neill and I. Z. Rothstein, Nucl. Phys.B877, 177 (2013), arXiv:1304.7263 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  7. [7]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, J. F. Donoghue, and P. Van- hove, JHEP02, 111 (2014), arXiv:1309.0804 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  8. [8]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, G. Festuc- cia, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 171601 (2018), arXiv:1806.04920 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    From Scattering Amplitudes to Classical Potentials in the Post-Minkowskian Expansion

    C. Cheung, I. Z. Rothstein, and M. P. Solon, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 251101 (2018), arXiv:1808.02489 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [10]

    D. A. Kosower, B. Maybee, and D. O’Connell, JHEP 02, 137 (2019), arXiv:1811.10950 [hep-th]. 7

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  11. [11]

    Kälin and R

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, (2020), arXiv:2006.01184 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    Mogull, J

    G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP02, 048 (2021), arXiv:2010.02865 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  13. [13]

    Cristofoli, N

    A. Cristofoli, N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. D100, 084040 (2019), arXiv:1906.01579 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Scattering Amplitudes and the Conservative Hamiltonian for Binary Systems at Third Post-Minkowskian Order

    Z.Bern, C.Cheung, R.Roiban, C.-H.Shen, M.P.Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 201603 (2019), arXiv:1901.04424 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  15. [15]

    Energetics of two-body Hamiltonians in post-Minkowskian gravity

    A. Antonelli, A. Buonanno, J. Steinhoff, M. van de Meent, and J. Vines, Phys. Rev. D99, 104004 (2019), arXiv:1901.07102 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  16. [16]

    Zeng, JHEP10, 206 (2019), arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]

    Z.Bern, C.Cheung, R.Roiban, C.-H.Shen, M.P.Solon, and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 206 (2019), arXiv:1908.01493 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Parra-Martinez, M

    J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, JHEP11, 023 (2020), arXiv:2005.04236 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B811, 135924 (2020), arXiv:2008.12743 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Damour,Radiative contribution to classical gravitational scattering at the third order in G,Phys

    T. Damour, Phys. Rev. D102, 124008 (2020), arXiv:2010.01641 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Conservative Dynamics of Binary Systems to Third Post-Minkowskian Order from the Effective Field Theory Approach,

    G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 261103 (2020), arXiv:2007.04977 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  21. [21]

    Z. Bern, A. Luna, R. Roiban, C.-H. Shen, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. D104, 065014 (2021), arXiv:2005.03071 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Phys. Lett. B818, 136379 (2021), arXiv:2101.05772 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  23. [23]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, JHEP07, 169 (2021), arXiv:2104.03256 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  24. [24]

    Herrmann, J

    E. Herrmann, J. Parra-Martinez, M. S. Ruf, and M. Zeng, JHEP10, 148 (2021), arXiv:2104.03957 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  25. [25]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, Phys. Rev. D104, 026009 (2021), arXiv:2104.04510 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, JHEP08, 172 (2021), arXiv:2105.05218 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  27. [27]

    P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, JHEP11, 213 (2021), arXiv:2107.12891 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. Chen, G. Travaglini, and C. Wen, JHEP10, 118 (2021), arXiv:2108.04216 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  29. [29]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, JHEP03, 071 (2022), arXiv:2111.02976 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161103 (2022), arXiv:2112.10750 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  31. [31]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Lett. B831, 137203 (2022), arXiv:2106.08276 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 161104 (2022), arXiv:2112.11296 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  33. [33]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, JHEP01, 027 (2022), arXiv:2109.04465 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and J. Steinhoff, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 011101 (2022), arXiv:2106.10256 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  35. [35]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.-H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 171601 (2021), arXiv:2101.07254 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, P. H. Damgaard, L. Plante, and P. Vanhove, J. Phys. A55, 443014 (2022), arXiv:2203.13024 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  37. [37]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, (2022), arXiv:2212.08957 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Z. Bern, J. Parra-Martinez, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, C.- H. Shen, M. P. Solon, and M. Zeng, PoSLL2022, 051 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    Dlapa, G

    C. Dlapa, G. Kälin, Z. Liu, J. Neef, and R. A. Porto, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 101401 (2023), arXiv:2210.05541 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  40. [40]

    G. U. Jakobsen and G. Mogull, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 141102 (2022), arXiv:2201.07778 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  41. [41]

    Adamo and R

    T. Adamo and R. Gonzo, JHEP05, 088 (2023), arXiv:2212.13269 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    Z. Bern, D. Kosmopoulos, A. Luna, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 201402 (2023), arXiv:2203.06202 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    A. Luna, N. Moynihan, D. O’Connell, and A. Ross, JHEP08, 045 (2024), arXiv:2312.09960 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    P. H. Damgaard, E. R. Hansen, L. Planté, and P. Van- hove, JHEP09, 183 (2023), arXiv:2307.04746 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  45. [45]

    Di Vecchia, C

    P. Di Vecchia, C. Heissenberg, R. Russo, and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rept.1083, 1 (2024), arXiv:2306.16488 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [46]

    Heissenberg, Phys

    C. Heissenberg, Phys. Rev. D108, 106003 (2023), arXiv:2308.11470 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  47. [47]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and Y. Xu, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 151401 (2023), arXiv:2306.01714 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, L. Planté, and P. Vanhove, Springer Nature Singapore (2023), 10.1007/978-981-19- 3079-9-3-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-19- 2023

  49. [49]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 241402 (2024), arXiv:2403.07781 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  50. [50]

    Chen and T

    G. Chen and T. Wang, JHEP12, 213 (2025), arXiv:2406.09086 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Binary Kerr black-hole scattering at 2PM from quantum higher-spin Compton,

    L. Bohnenblust, L. Cangemi, H. Johansson, and P. Pi- chini, (2024), arXiv:2410.23271 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, A. Klemm, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, Nature 641, 603 (2025), arXiv:2411.11846 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  53. [53]

    Systematic integral evaluation for spin-resummed binary dynamics,

    G. Chen, J.-W. Kim, and T. Wang, Phys. Rev. D111, L021701 (2025), arXiv:2406.17658 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Akpinar, F

    D. Akpinar, F. Febres Cordero, M. Kraus, A. Smirnov, and M. Zeng, (2025), arXiv:2502.08961 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    N. E. J. Bjerrum-Bohr, G. Chen, C. Su, and T. Wang, (2025), arXiv:2503.20538 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Static two-body potential at fifth post-Newtonian order

    S. Foffa, P. Mastrolia, R. Sturani, C. Sturm, and W. J. Torres Bobadilla, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 241605 (2019), arXiv:1902.10571 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Bluemlein, A

    J. Bluemlein, A. Maier, and P. Marquard, Phys. Lett. B800, 135100 (2020), arXiv:1902.11180 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  58. [58]

    Foffa, R

    S. Foffa, R. A. Porto, I. Rothstein, and R. Sturani, Phys. Rev. D100, 024048 (2019), arXiv:1903.05118 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  59. [59]

    Bluemlein, A

    J. Bluemlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Schaefer, Nucl.Phys.B955,115041(2020),arXiv:2003.01692[gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Bluemlein, A

    J. Bluemlein, A. Maier, P. Marquard, and G. Schaefer, (2020), arXiv:2003.07145 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Kälin and R

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, JHEP02, 120 (2020), arXiv:1911.09130 [hep-th]. 8

    work page arXiv 2020

  62. [62]

    G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, J. Plefka, and B. Sauer, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 241402 (2023), arXiv:2308.11514 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    K¨ alin and R

    G. Kälin and R. A. Porto, JHEP01, 072 (2020), arXiv:1910.03008 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  64. [64]

    Driesse, G

    M. Driesse, G. U. Jakobsen, G. Mogull, C. Nega, J. Plefka, B. Sauer, and J. Usovitsch, (2026), arXiv:2601.16256 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  65. [65]

    Z. Bern, E. Herrmann, R. Roiban, M. S. Ruf, A. V. Smirnov, S. Smith, and M. Zeng, (2025), arXiv:2512.23654 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, P. Pichini, G. Travaglini, and P. Vives Matasan, (2025), arXiv:2512.05017 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    J.-W. Kim, R. Patil, T. Scheopner, and J. Steinhoff, (2025), arXiv:2511.05649 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, S. De Angelis, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, JHEP06, 048 (2023), arXiv:2303.06111 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  69. [69]

    Herderschee, R

    A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, JHEP06, 004 (2023), arXiv:2303.06112 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  70. [70]

    Elkhidir, D

    A. Elkhidir, D. O’Connell, M. Sergola, and I. A. Vazquez-Holm, JHEP07, 272 (2024), arXiv:2303.06211 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  71. [71]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and I. Vazquez-Holm, JHEP06, 126 (2023), arXiv:2303.07006 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Caron-Huot, M

    S. Caron-Huot, M. Giroux, H. S. Hannesdottir, and S. Mizera, JHEP01, 139 (2024), arXiv:2308.02125 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    Bohnenblust, H

    L. Bohnenblust, H. Ita, M. Kraus, and J. Schlenk, JHEP11, 109 (2024), arXiv:2312.14859 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, and A. Geralico, Phys. Rev. D 108, 124052 (2023), arXiv:2309.14925 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [75]

    Georgoudis, C

    A. Georgoudis, C. Heissenberg, and R. Russo, JHEP 03, 089 (2024), arXiv:2312.07452 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Brandhuber, G

    A. Brandhuber, G. R. Brown, G. Chen, J. Gowdy, and G. Travaglini, JHEP02, 026 (2024), arXiv:2310.04405 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  77. [77]

    De Angelis, P

    S. De Angelis, P. P. Novichkov, and R. Gonzo, Phys. Rev. D110, L041502 (2024), arXiv:2309.17429 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  78. [78]

    Adamo, R

    T. Adamo, R. Gonzo, and A. Ilderton, JHEP05, 034 (2024), arXiv:2402.00124 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  79. [79]

    D. Bini, T. Damour, S. De Angelis, A. Geralico, A. Herderschee, R. Roiban, and F. Teng, Phys. Rev. D109, 125008 (2024), arXiv:2402.06604 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  80. [80]

    Alessio and P

    F. Alessio and P. Di Vecchia, J. Phys. A57, 475402 (2024), arXiv:2402.06533 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.