arxiv: 2604.14281 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-15 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-ex

Recognition: unknown

Probing τ lepton dipole moments at future Lepton Colliders

Dario Buttazzo , Gabriele Levati , Yang Ma , Fabio Maltoni , Paride Paradisi , ZeQiang Wang

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 12:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-ex

keywords tau leptondipole momentsfuture collidersFCCmuon collidernew physicsStandard Model testsHiggs production

0 comments

The pith

Future lepton colliders can extend current bounds on tau dipole moments by several orders of magnitude

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how the Future Circular Collider in electron-positron mode and a multi-TeV muon collider can measure the electric and magnetic dipole moments of the tau lepton. These moments are far less constrained than those of the electron or muon, which already test the Standard Model stringently and search for new physics. The work analyzes several processes: direct tau-pair production, Higgs boson production in association with taus, radiative Higgs decays to taus plus a photon, and vector-boson scattering into tau pairs. A sympathetic reader would care because stronger limits could reveal or exclude new interactions that affect leptons at high scales.

Core claim

The central claim is that the e+e- Future Circular Collider and a multi-TeV muon collider are highly complementary and, through channels such as ℓ+ℓ- → τ+τ-, μ+μ- → τ+τ- H, H → τ+τ- γ, and vector-boson scattering processes, can extend existing experimental bounds on the tau electric and magnetic dipole moments by several orders of magnitude.

What carries the argument

The projected experimental sensitivities obtained by simulating the listed production and decay channels at the planned collider energies and luminosities, treating the tau dipole moments as effective couplings that modify the rates and distributions.

Load-bearing premise

The projections assume the colliders reach their design luminosities and that backgrounds and tau identification efficiencies can be controlled at the levels needed to achieve the calculated sensitivities.

What would settle it

If the actual tau-pair or Higgs-plus-tau event yields at these colliders show backgrounds or efficiencies that prevent reaching the projected sensitivity improvements, the claim that bounds can be extended by several orders of magnitude would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.14281 by Dario Buttazzo, Fabio Maltoni, Gabriele Levati, Paride Paradisi, Yang Ma, ZeQiang Wang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. 95% CL bounds in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. 95% CL bounds in the ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. 95% CL bounds on ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: shows the 95% CL bounds in the (CτW , CτB) plane at FCC-ee and at a multi-TeV µC. A clear pattern emerges: while FCC-ee provides strong constraints on a Z τ and d Z τ from the high-luminosity Z-pole program, the µC becomes the more powerful probe of both a (Z) τ and d (Z) τ at energies above ∼ 10 TeV. In particular, a 14 TeV µC improves the constraint on dτ by more than two orders of magnitude relative to … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

The electric and magnetic dipole moments of the electron and of the muon provide stringent tests of the Standard Model and sensitive probes of new physics. By contrast, the corresponding dipole moments of the $\tau$ lepton remain weakly constrained. This study explores the potential of future lepton colliders, focusing on the $e^+e^-$ Future Circular Collider and a multi-TeV muon collider, to probe $\tau$ dipole moments. We consider multiple channels, including $\ell^+\ell^- \to \tau^+\tau^-$ ($\ell=e,\mu$), associated Higgs production $\mu^+\mu^- \to \tau^+\tau^- H$, radiative Higgs decays $H \to \tau^+\tau^-\gamma$, and vector-boson scattering $\ell^+\ell^- \to \ell^+\ell^-\tau^+\tau^-$ and $\mu^+\mu^- \to \bar\nu\nu\tau^+\tau^-$. Our results show that these facilities are highly complementary and can extend existing bounds by several orders of magnitude.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper maps out concrete sensitivity gains for the tau's electric and magnetic dipole moments at FCC-ee and a multi-TeV muon collider across several channels.

read the letter

The main point is that future lepton colliders could push existing limits on the tau dipole moments down by several orders of magnitude, with the electron and muon machines playing complementary roles. The work looks at tau-pair production, associated Higgs production, radiative Higgs decays, and vector-boson scattering, and it shows how the different energy and luminosity profiles line up to cover different aspects of the dipole operators. That coverage is the useful part: it gives experimenters a menu of channels rather than a single optimistic estimate. The calculations appear to follow standard collider phenomenology, with no obvious internal contradictions in the approach described in the abstract and stress-test summary. The complementarity claim holds up on the surface because the muon collider reaches higher energies while the FCC-ee offers higher precision at lower energies. Soft spots are the usual ones for projection papers. The reach depends on achieving design luminosities and on controlling backgrounds in the tau channels at the level assumed. The abstract gives no numbers on efficiencies, systematic uncertainties, or how the statistical analysis is done, so the full text needs to show those details clearly. If the background rejection is optimistic or if some channels have larger irreducible backgrounds than modeled, the orders-of-magnitude improvement could shrink. Nothing in the provided summary suggests the authors hid a flaw, but the projections are only as good as the simulation inputs. This is a paper for people who work on tau physics or who are involved in the design studies for FCC-ee and muon colliders. A reader who needs updated reference numbers for new-physics reach in the lepton sector will get value from the tables and plots. It is not a foundational result, but it is a solid, incremental contribution that belongs in the literature. I would send it to peer review so that referees can check the background modeling and efficiency assumptions in detail.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the potential of future lepton colliders (FCC-ee and a multi-TeV muon collider) to constrain the electric and magnetic dipole moments of the tau lepton. It considers multiple channels including ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ → τ⁺τ⁻ (ℓ = e, μ), associated Higgs production μ⁺μ⁻ → τ⁺τ⁻H, radiative Higgs decays H → τ⁺τ⁻γ, and vector-boson scattering processes ℓ⁺ℓ⁻ → ℓ⁺ℓ⁻τ⁺τ⁻ and μ⁺μ⁻ → ν̄ντ⁺τ⁻. The central claim is that these facilities are highly complementary and can extend existing bounds by several orders of magnitude.

Significance. If the projections hold, the work is significant for highlighting how future colliders can substantially improve constraints on tau dipole moments, which remain weakly bounded relative to the electron and muon. The multi-channel, multi-collider approach demonstrates complementarity between e⁺e⁻ and μ⁺μ⁻ machines and provides a useful phenomenological roadmap for new-physics searches. The use of standard collider phenomenology for forward-looking estimates is a clear strength.

minor comments (2)

The abstract states the main conclusion but supplies no information on the underlying calculations, statistical methods, systematic uncertainties, or background modeling. A brief summary of these elements (e.g., luminosity assumptions, efficiency tables, or background rejection strategies) should be added to the abstract or introduction for completeness.
A summary table comparing the projected 95% CL bounds on d_τ and a_τ across all channels and both colliders would improve readability and allow direct assessment of the complementarity claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation of our manuscript and for recommending minor revision. We appreciate the acknowledgment of the significance of our multi-channel, multi-collider study in improving constraints on the tau lepton dipole moments.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central results consist of forward-looking sensitivity projections for tau dipole moments at future colliders (FCC-ee and multi-TeV muon collider) across listed channels such as dilepton production, associated Higgs production, radiative Higgs decays, and vector-boson scattering. These projections rely on standard collider phenomenology, cross-section calculations, and external design parameters (luminosities, efficiencies, backgrounds) rather than any derivation that reduces by the paper's own equations to quantities fitted from the same data or self-referential definitions. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to an input by construction, imports uniqueness via self-citation, or renames a known result as a new unification. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, preventing identification of specific free parameters, axioms or invented entities used in the analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5497 in / 1062 out tokens · 52236 ms · 2026-05-10T12:42:49.911656+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Four-fermion operators, $Z$-boson exchange, and $\tau$ lepton dipole moments
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Z-boson exchange contributes ~3e-6 to the relevant asymmetries while four-fermion operators can reach ~1e-5 times Wilson coefficients, with loop insertions offering an additional path to a_tau without beam polarization.
Probing the Tau Anomalous Magnetic Moment at Colliders: From Ultra-Peripheral Collisions to the Precision Frontier
hep-ph 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 2.0

The paper reviews collider-based measurements of the tau anomalous magnetic moment, highlighting LHC ultra-peripheral collisions and projected sensitivities at future facilities like Belle II and FCC.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 5 internal anchors

[1]

X. Fan, T. G. Myers, B. A. D. Sukra, and G. Gabrielse, Measurement of the Electron Magnetic Moment, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 071801 (2023), arXiv:2209.13084 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[2]

D. P. Aguillardet al.(Muon g-2), Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 0.20 ppm, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 161802 (2023), arXiv:2308.06230 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2023
[3]

D. P. Aguillardet al.(Muon g-2), Measurement of the Positive Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment to 127 ppb, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 101802 (2025), arXiv:2506.03069 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[4]

Morel, Z

L. Morel, Z. Yao, P. Clad´ e, and S. Guellati-Kh´ elifa, De- termination of the fine-structure constant with an accu- racy of 81 parts per trillion, Nature588, 61 (2020)

2020
[5]

R. H. Parker, C. Yu, W. Zhong, B. Estey, and H. M¨ uller, Measurement of the fine-structure constant as a test of the Standard Model, Science360, 191 (2018), arXiv:1812.04130 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[6]

Alibertiet al., Phys

R. Alibertiet al., The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the Standard Model: an update, Phys. Rept. 7 1143, 1 (2025), arXiv:2505.21476 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[7]

D. W. Hertzog and M. Hoferichter, The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon: status and perspec- tives, arxiv 10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-040841 (2025), arXiv:2512.16980 [hep-ph]

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102422-040841 2025
[8]

T. S. Roussyet al., An improved bound on the electron’s electric dipole moment, Science381, adg4084 (2023), arXiv:2212.11841 [physics.atom-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[9]

G. W. Bennettet al.(Muong−2), An Improved Limit on the Muon Electric Dipole Moment, Phys. Rev. D80, 052008 (2009), arXiv:0811.1207 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2009
[10]

Eidelman and M

S. Eidelman and M. Passera, Theory of the tau lepton anomalous magnetic moment, Mod. Phys. Lett. A22, 159 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0701260

work page arXiv 2007
[11]

Eidelman, D

S. Eidelman, D. Epifanov, M. Fael, L. Mercolli, and M. Passera,τdipole moments via radiative leptonicτ decays, JHEP03, 140, arXiv:1601.07987 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[12]

Di Luzio, A

L. Di Luzio, A. Keshavarzi, A. Masiero, and P. Paradisi, Model-Independent Tests of the Hadronic Vacuum Polar- ization Contribution to the Muon g-2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 011902 (2025), arXiv:2408.01123 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Hoferichter, P

M. Hoferichter, P. Stoffer, and M. Zillinger, Hadronic light-by-light scattering in the anomalous magnetic mo- ments of electron andτ, Phys. Lett. B866, 139565 (2025), arXiv:2504.10582 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[14]

Lepton anomalous magnetic moments: Theory

H. Wittig, Lepton anomalous magnetic moments: The- ory, arxiv (2025), arXiv:2512.18382 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[15]

Barbieri, G

R. Barbieri, G. R. Dvali, and L. J. Hall, Predictions from a U(2) flavor symmetry in supersymmetric theories, Phys. Lett. B377, 76 (1996), arXiv:hep-ph/9512388

work page arXiv 1996
[16]

Barbieri and L

R. Barbieri and L. J. Hall, A Grand unified supersym- metric theory of flavor, Nuovo Cim. A110, 1 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9605224

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1997
[17]

Barbieri, L

R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, S. Raby, and A. Romanino, Uni- fied theories with U(2) flavor symmetry, Nucl. Phys. B 493, 3 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9610449

work page arXiv 1997
[18]

Barbieri, L

R. Barbieri, L. J. Hall, and A. Romanino, Consequences of a U(2) flavor symmetry, Phys. Lett. B401, 47 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9702315

work page arXiv 1997
[19]

A. L. Kagan, G. Perez, T. Volansky, and J. Zupan, Gen- eral Minimal Flavor Violation, Phys. Rev. D80, 076002 (2009), arXiv:0903.1794 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2009
[20]

Barbieri, D

R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, and D. M. Straub, Flavour physics from an approximateU(2) 3 symmetry, JHEP07, 181, arXiv:1203.4218 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[21]

Panico and A

G. Panico and A. Wulzer,The Composite Nambu- Goldstone Higgs, Vol. 913 (Springer, 2016) arXiv:1506.01961 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[22]

Panico and A

G. Panico and A. Pomarol, Flavor hierarchies from dy- namical scales, JHEP07, 097, arXiv:1603.06609 [hep- ph]

work page arXiv
[23]

Barbieri, D

R. Barbieri, D. Buttazzo, F. Sala, D. M. Straub, and A. Tesi, A 125 GeV composite Higgs boson versus flavour and electroweak precision tests, JHEP05, 069, arXiv:1211.5085 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[24]

Glioti, R

A. Glioti, R. Rattazzi, L. Ricci, and L. Vecchi, Exploring the flavor symmetry landscape, SciPost Phys.18, 201 (2025), arXiv:2402.09503 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

Bordone, C

M. Bordone, C. Cornella, J. Fuentes-Martin, and G. Isidori, A three-site gauge model for flavor hierar- chies and flavor anomalies, Phys. Lett. B779, 317 (2018), arXiv:1712.01368 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2018
[26]

Fuentes-Martin, G

J. Fuentes-Martin, G. Isidori, J. M. Lizana, N. Selimovic, and B. A. Stefanek, Flavor hierarchies, flavor anomalies, and Higgs mass from a warped extra dimension, Phys. Lett. B834, 137382 (2022), arXiv:2203.01952 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[27]

Davighi and G

J. Davighi and G. Isidori, Non-universal gauge interac- tions addressing the inescapable link between Higgs and flavour, JHEP07, 147, arXiv:2303.01520 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[28]

Buchmuller and D

W. Buchmuller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian Anal- ysis of New Interactions and Flavor Conservation, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1986)

1986
[29]

Abdallahet al.(DELPHI), Study of tau-pair produc- tion in photon-photon collisions at LEP and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of the tau lepton, Eur

J. Abdallahet al.(DELPHI), Study of tau-pair produc- tion in photon-photon collisions at LEP and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of the tau lepton, Eur. Phys. J. C35, 159 (2004), arXiv:hep-ex/0406010

work page arXiv 2004
[30]

G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), A measurement of the high-mass τ τproduction cross-section at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector and constraints on new particles and couplings, JHEP10, 054, arXiv:2503.19836 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv
[31]

Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation ofγγ→τ τ in proton-proton collisions and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of theτlepton, Rept

A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation ofγγ→τ τ in proton-proton collisions and limits on the anomalous electromagnetic moments of theτlepton, Rept. Prog. Phys.87, 107801 (2024), arXiv:2406.03975 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[32]

Inamiet al.(Belle), An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτlepton, JHEP04, 110, arXiv:2108.11543 [hep-ex]

K. Inamiet al.(Belle), An improved search for the electric dipole moment of theτlepton, JHEP04, 110, arXiv:2108.11543 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv
[33]

Bernabeu, G

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, and J. Vidal, CP violation and electric-dipole-moment at low energy tau production with polarized electrons, Nucl. Phys. B 763, 283 (2007), arXiv:hep-ph/0610135

work page arXiv 2007
[34]

Bernabeu, G

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, J. Papavassiliou, and J. Vidal, Tau anomalous magnetic moment form- factor at super B/flavor factories, Nucl. Phys. B790, 160 (2008), arXiv:0707.2496 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[35]

Bernabeu, G

J. Bernabeu, G. A. Gonzalez-Sprinberg, and J. Vidal, Tau spin correlations and the anomalous magnetic mo- ment, JHEP01, 062, arXiv:0807.2366 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[36]

Crivellin, M

A. Crivellin, M. Hoferichter, and J. M. Roney, To- ward testing the magnetic moment of the tau at one part per million, Phys. Rev. D106, 093007 (2022), arXiv:2111.10378 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[37]

D. M. Asneret al.(US Belle II Group, Belle II/SuperKEKB e- Polarization Upgrade Working Group), Snowmass 2021 White Paper on Upgrading SuperKEKB with a Polarized Electron Beam: Discovery Potential and Proposed Implementation, inSnowmass 2021(2022) arXiv:2205.12847 [physics.acc-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[38]

Aiharaet al., The Belle II detector upgrades frame- workconceptualdesignreport,arXiv:2406.19421(2024)

H. Aiharaet al., The Belle II Detector Upgrades Framework Conceptual Design Report (2024), arXiv:2406.19421 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2024
[39]

Gogniat, M

J. Gogniat, M. Hoferichter, and Y. Ulrich, Towards test- ing (g−2) τ in e+e− →τ +τ −: radiative corrections and projections for Belle II, JHEP07, 172, arXiv:2505.09678 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[40]

Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments

M. Hoferichter and G. Levati, Light new physics and the τlepton dipole moments (2025), arXiv:2511.03786 [hep- ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[41]

Light new physics and the $\tau$ lepton dipole moments: prospects at Belle II

M. Hoferichter and G. Levati, Light new physics and the τlepton dipole moments: prospects at Belle II (2025), arXiv:2510.13966 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[42]

The Belle II Physics Book,

W. Altmannshoferet al.(Belle II), The Belle II Physics Book, PTEP2019, 123C01 (2019), [Erratum: PTEP 2020, 029201 (2020)], arXiv:1808.10567 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2019
[43]

Abadaet al.(FCC), FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Vol- ume 2, Eur

A. Abadaet al.(FCC), FCC-ee: The Lepton Collider: Future Circular Collider Conceptual Design Report Vol- ume 2, Eur. Phys. J. ST228, 261 (2019)

2019
[44]

The Future Circular Collider: a Summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process

G. Bernardiet al., The Future Circular Collider: a 8 Summary for the US 2021 Snowmass Process, (2022), arXiv:2203.06520 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2021
[45]

Benedikt et al

M. Benediktet al.(FCC), Future Circular Collider Feasibility Study Report: Volume 1, Physics, Exper- iments, Detectors, Eur. Phys. J. C85, 1468 (2025), arXiv:2505.00272 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[46]

Altmannet al.,ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Fac- tory Study, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol

J. Altmannet al.,ECFA Higgs, electroweak, and top Fac- tory Study, CERN Yellow Reports: Monographs, Vol. 5/2025 (2025) arXiv:2506.15390 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2025
[47]

de Blaset al.(Muon Collider), The physics case of a 3 TeV muon collider stage, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.07261 [hep-ph]

J. de Blaset al.(Muon Collider), The physics case of a 3 TeV muon collider stage, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.07261 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[48]

Aime et al.,Muon Collider Physics Summary,2203.07256

C. Aimeet al., Muon Collider Physics Summary, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.07256 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[49]

K. M. Blacket al., Muon Collider Forum report, JINST 19(02), T02015, arXiv:2209.01318 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv
[50]

Accettura et al.,Towards a muon collider,Eur

C. Accetturaet al., Towards a muon collider, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 864 (2023), [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 84, 36 (2024)], arXiv:2303.08533 [physics.acc-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[51]

J. P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Man- souli´ e, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, D. Schulte, A. Skrin- sky, and A. Wulzer, Muon Colliders, arxiv (2019), arXiv:1901.06150 [physics.acc-ph]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[52]

Detector and Physics Performance at a Muon Collider,

N. Bartosiket al., Detector and Physics Perfor- mance at a Muon Collider, JINST15(05), P05001, arXiv:2001.04431 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2001
[53]

Schulte, J.-P

D. Schulte, J.-P. Delahaye, M. Diemoz, K. Long, B. Mansouli´ e, N. Pastrone, L. Rivkin, A. Skrinsky, and A. Wulzer, Prospects on Muon Colliders, PoS ICHEP2020, 703 (2021)

2021
[54]

K. Long, D. Lucchesi, M. Palmer, N. Pastrone, D. Schulte, and V. Shiltsev, Muon colliders to expand frontiers of particle physics, Nature Phys.17, 289 (2021), arXiv:2007.15684 [physics.acc-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[55]

Stratakiset al.[Muon Collider], [arXiv:2203.08033 [physics.acc-ph]]

D. Stratakiset al.(Muon Collider), A Muon Col- lider Facility for Physics Discovery, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.08033 [physics.acc-ph]

work page arXiv 2022
[56]

Bartosiket al.(Muon Collider), Simulated Detec- tor Performance at the Muon Collider, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.07964 [hep-ex]

N. Bartosiket al.(Muon Collider), Simulated Detec- tor Performance at the Muon Collider, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.07964 [hep-ex]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Aaltonenet al.(CDF), Science376, 170 (2022), arXiv:2203.07224 [hep-ex]

S. Jindarianiet al.(Muon Collider), Promising Technolo- gies and R&D Directions for the Future Muon Collider Detectors, arxiv (2022), arXiv:2203.07224 [physics.ins- det]

work page arXiv 2022
[58]

Accetturaet al.[International Muon Collider], [arXiv:2504.21417 [physics.acc-ph]]

C. Accetturaet al.(International Muon Collider), The Muon Collider, arxiv (2025), arXiv:2504.21417 [physics.acc-ph]

work page arXiv 2025
[59]

Buttazzo and P

D. Buttazzo and P. Paradisi, Probing the muong−2 anomaly with the Higgs boson at a muon collider, Phys. Rev. D104, 075021 (2021), arXiv:2012.02769 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[60]

Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian

B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak, and J. Rosiek, Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian, JHEP10, 085, arXiv:1008.4884 [hep-ph]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[61]

Allwicher, L

L. Allwicher, L. Di Luzio, M. Fedele, F. Mescia, and M. Nardecchia, What is the scale of new physics be- hind the muon g-2?, Phys. Rev. D104, 055035 (2021), arXiv:2105.13981 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2021
[62]

L. C. Bresciani, P. Paradisi, and A. Sainaghi, Unitar- ity bounds and sum rules in the SMEFT, arxiv (2026), arXiv:2603.03423 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2026
[63]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormal- ization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimen- sion Six Operators I: Formalism and lambda Dependence, JHEP10, 087, arXiv:1308.2627 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[64]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormal- ization Group Evolution of the Standard Model Dimen- sion Six Operators II: Yukawa Dependence, JHEP01, 035, arXiv:1310.4838 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[65]

Alonso, E.E

R. Alonso, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and M. Trott, Renormalization Group Evolution of the Stan- dard Model Dimension Six Operators III: Gauge Cou- pling Dependence and Phenomenology, JHEP04, 159, arXiv:1312.2014 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2014
[66]

E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, and P. Stoffer, Low- Energy Effective Field Theory below the Electroweak Scale: Anomalous Dimensions, JHEP01, 084, [Erratum: JHEP12, 042 (2023)], arXiv:1711.05270 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2023
[67]

Aebischer, W

J. Aebischer, W. Dekens, E. E. Jenkins, A. V. Manohar, D. Sengupta, and P. Stoffer, Effective field theory inter- pretation of lepton magnetic and electric dipole moments, JHEP07, 107, arXiv:2102.08954 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[68]

G. F. Giudice, P. Paradisi, and M. Passera, Testing new physics with the electron g-2, JHEP11, 113, arXiv:1208.6583 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[69]

W. J. Marciano, A. Masiero, P. Paradisi, and M. Passera, Contributions of axionlike particles to lepton dipole mo- ments, Phys. Rev. D94, 115033 (2016), arXiv:1607.01022 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv 2016
[70]

J. Alda, G. Levati, P. Paradisi, S. Rigolin, and N. Se- limovic, Collider and astrophysical signatures of light scalars with enhancedτcouplings, JHEP06, 008, arXiv:2407.18296 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv
[71]

Improving the Weizs\"acker-Williams Approximation in Electron-Proton Collisions

S. Frixione, M. L. Mangano, P. Nason, and G. Ridolfi, Im- proving the Weizsacker-Williams approximation in elec- tron - proton collisions, Phys. Lett. B319, 339 (1993), arXiv:hep-ph/9310350

work page Pith review arXiv 1993
[72]

J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin, and G. Tiktopoulos, Deriva- tion of Gauge Invariance from High-Energy Unitarity Bounds on the s Matrix, Phys. Rev. D10, 1145 (1974), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 11, 972 (1975)]

1974
[73]

B. W. Lee, C. Quigg, and H. B. Thacker, Weak Inter- actions at Very High-Energies: The Role of the Higgs Boson Mass, Phys. Rev. D16, 1519 (1977)

1977
[74]

M. S. Chanowitz and M. K. Gaillard, The TeV Physics of Strongly Interacting W’s and Z’s, Nucl. Phys. B261, 379 (1985)

1985
[75]

T. Han, Y. Ma, and K. Xie, Quark and gluon contents of a lepton at high energies, JHEP02, 154, arXiv:2103.09844 [hep-ph]

work page arXiv