pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15333 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-09 · 💻 cs.HC · cs.AI

Technically Love: The Evolution of Human-AI Romance Discourse on Reddit

Tyler Chang , Jina Huh-Yoo , Afsaneh Razi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 14:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC cs.AI
keywords human-AI romanceReddit discoursetopic modelingcompanion AItemporal analysisplatform governanceAI ethicspublic discourse evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reddit discussions of AI romance have drifted from personal intimacy to governance and technical concerns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines thousands of self-disclosed Reddit posts about romantic relationships with AI companions spanning 2017 to 2025. Researchers applied topic modeling and time-based statistical checks to track how the main themes changed. Early posts centered on emotional closeness and positive experiences, while later ones increasingly addressed platform rules, technical problems, and effects outside the digital space. This pattern suggests the conversation has moved from private feelings to questions of control and real-world impact. Readers may care because the shift points to changing expectations for how companion AI systems should be built and overseen.

Core claim

Analysis of 3,383 Reddit posts reveals significant topic drift in human-AI romance discourse, with discussions moving away from positive intimate relationships toward platform governance, technical issues, and real-world consequences.

What carries the argument

Topic modeling combined with temporal statistical analysis on a curated set of self-disclosed companion AI posts, used to detect and quantify shifts in dominant themes across years.

If this is right

  • Companion AI design should incorporate stronger governance tools and technical safeguards as user priorities shift.
  • Platform operators may need updated policies to handle discussions of real-world relationship outcomes.
  • Regulatory approaches to AI companions could gain relevance as public framing moves from personal experience to systemic issues.
  • Developers might benefit from monitoring forum trends to anticipate user concerns about long-term effects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The observed drift may signal rising public awareness of AI limitations that early users overlooked.
  • Similar topic shifts could occur in other online spaces discussing emerging technologies.
  • Longitudinal forum analysis offers one way to forecast when new tech transitions from novelty to regulated domain.
  • Design teams could treat Reddit patterns as an early signal for features addressing external consequences.

Load-bearing premise

The 3,383 selected Reddit posts accurately reflect the broader evolution of public discourse on human-AI romance without major selection or reporting biases.

What would settle it

A follow-up study that expands the dataset beyond Reddit or re-runs the topic modeling with different parameters and finds no consistent movement toward governance and technical themes would undermine the drift finding.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15333 by Afsaneh Razi, Jina Huh-Yoo, Tyler Chang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of data collection, filtering, topic modeling, and validation procedures. Starting from 72 candidate subreddits and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temporal coverage and volume of subreddits included in the dataset. Each point marks the first observed post, horizontal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Number of posts per month [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (left) The distribution of posts per thematic group, sorted from highest to lowest; (right) The number of thematic groups [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Human-AI romantic relationships are increasingly common, yet little is understood about how public discourse around them emerges and shifts over time. Prior research has examined user experiences and ethical concerns, but lacks longitudinal analyses of user-initiated public discussions. We address this gap by analyzing a high-precision dataset of 3,383 self-disclosed romantic companion AI posts from Reddit (2017-2025), using topic modeling and temporal statistical analysis to identify dominant themes and their evolution over time. We find significant topic drift, with discussions moving away from positive intimate relationships toward platform governance, technical issues, and real-world consequences. These shifts highlight a transition in how human-AI romance is framed-moving from private experiences to technical mediation and regulation-with implications for the design and governance of companion AI systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a high-precision dataset of 3,383 self-disclosed Reddit posts on romantic companion AI (2017-2025) via topic modeling and temporal statistical analysis, claiming significant topic drift away from positive intimate relationships toward platform governance, technical issues, and real-world consequences, with implications for companion AI design and governance.

Significance. If the dataset accurately captures discourse evolution and the topic modeling is robust, the work provides a valuable longitudinal, data-driven complement to existing qualitative studies on human-AI romance, documenting a shift from private experiences to technical and regulatory framing that could inform future AI ethics and platform policy.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: No details are provided on topic model parameters (e.g., number of topics, LDA hyperparameters, coherence scores, or validation procedures such as human coding or stability checks), which directly affects the reliability of the claimed topic drift.
  2. [Data Collection and Results] Data Collection and Results: The central claim of genuine topic drift rests on the 3,383-post self-disclosed dataset without reported checks for selection bias, coverage of neutral/positive discussions, or adjustment for Reddit demographic/platform changes over 2017-2025; this leaves open the possibility that the shift is an artifact of posting incentives or visibility rather than underlying discourse evolution.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Data Collection] Clarify the exact data collection cutoff date within 2025 and any subreddit filters used, as these affect temporal comparability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which highlights important areas for strengthening the transparency and robustness of our analysis. We address each major comment below and indicate planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and Methods] Abstract and Methods: No details are provided on topic model parameters (e.g., number of topics, LDA hyperparameters, coherence scores, or validation procedures such as human coding or stability checks), which directly affects the reliability of the claimed topic drift.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section requires additional detail on the topic modeling process to support evaluation of the topic drift results. In the revised manuscript we will expand the Methods section with a full description of the LDA parameters, including the number of topics, hyperparameters, coherence scores, and validation steps such as human coding of a post sample and stability checks across runs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Data Collection and Results] Data Collection and Results: The central claim of genuine topic drift rests on the 3,383-post self-disclosed dataset without reported checks for selection bias, coverage of neutral/positive discussions, or adjustment for Reddit demographic/platform changes over 2017-2025; this leaves open the possibility that the shift is an artifact of posting incentives or visibility rather than underlying discourse evolution.

    Authors: We acknowledge the concern about potential selection bias and the absence of explicit checks for coverage or platform changes. Our dataset was intentionally filtered for high-precision self-disclosure to focus on authentic user-initiated romance discourse. In revision we will add an explicit limitations subsection in the Discussion that addresses selection effects, under-representation of neutral content, and Reddit's evolving user base and algorithms, supported by citations to relevant platform studies. We will also note that the temporal regression models already incorporate time-period controls. Full new empirical bias audits would require broader data collection outside the current scope, so the revision focuses on transparent discussion rather than additional experiments. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely empirical data-driven analysis

full rationale

The paper conducts a longitudinal empirical study by collecting a high-precision Reddit dataset of 3,383 posts and applying standard topic modeling plus temporal statistical analysis. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are used to generate the central claims about topic drift. The findings rest directly on the observed data patterns rather than reducing to any input by construction, satisfying the self-contained criterion.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are specified in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5430 in / 906 out tokens · 42138 ms · 2026-05-15T14:34:33.106139+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

85 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Muyideen Dele Adewale and Umaina Ibrahim Muhammad. 2025. From Virtual Companions to Forbidden Attractions: The Seductive Rise of Artificial Intelligence Love, Loneliness, and Intimacy—A Systematic Review.Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science(July 2025). https: //doi.org/10.1007/s41347-025-00549-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s41347-025-00549-4 2025

  2. [2]

    Eugene Agichtein and Luis Gravano. 2000. Snowball: Extracting relations from large plain-text collections. InProceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Digital libraries. 85–94

    work page 2000

  3. [3]

    Yoav Benjamini and Yosef Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological)57, 1 (1995), 289–300

    work page 1995

  4. [4]

    Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky. 2018. The ethics of artificial intelligence. InArtificial intelligence safety and security. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 57–69

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    James J Bradac. 1983. The language of lovers, flovers, and friends: Communicating in social and personal relationships.Journal of Language and Social Psychology2, 2-3-4 (1983), 141–162

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Mark Anthony Camilleri. 2024. Artificial intelligence governance: Ethical considerations and implications for social responsibility.Expert systems 41, 7 (2024), e13406

    work page 2024

  7. [7]

    Tyler Chang, Joseph J Trybala, Sharon Bassan, and Afsaneh Razi. 2025. Opaque Transparency: Gaps and Discrepancies in the Report of Social Media Harms. InProceedings of the Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 424, 12 pages. https://doi.o...

    work page doi:10.1145/3706599.3719829 2025

  8. [8]

    Xiongzhi Chen and Sanat K Sarkar. 2020. On Benjamini–Hochberg procedure applied to mid p-values.Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 205 (2020), 34–45

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Myra Cheng, Cinoo Lee, Pranav Khadpe, Sunny Yu, Dyllan Han, and Dan Jurafsky. 2025. Sycophantic AI decreases prosocial intentions and promotes dependence. (2025). arXiv:2510.01395 [cs.CY]

    work page arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Minh Duc Chu, Patrick Gerard, Kshitij Pawar, Charles Bickham, and Kristina Lerman. 2025. Illusions of intimacy: Emotional attachment and emerging psychological risks in human-ai relationships.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.11649(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    Glen Coppersmith, Mark Dredze, and Craig Harman. 2014. Quantifying mental health signals in Twitter. InProceedings of the workshop on computational linguistics and clinical psychology: From linguistic signal to clinical reality. 51–60

    work page 2014

  12. [12]

    Erica Coppolillo and Emilio Ferrara. 2026. Gendered Pathways in AI Companionship: Cross-Community Behavior and Toxicity Patterns on Reddit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.01073(2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Munmun De Choudhury, Michael Gamon, Scott Counts, and Eric Horvitz. 2013. Predicting depression via social media. InProceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, Vol. 7. 128–137

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Louise Deleger, Qi Li, Todd Lingren, Megan Kaiser, Katalin Molnar, Laura Stoutenborough, Michal Kouril, Keith Marsolo, Imre Solti, et al. 2012. Building gold standard corpora for medical natural language processing tasks. InAMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, Vol. 2012. 144

    work page 2012

  15. [15]

    Iliana Depounti, Paula Saukko, and Simone Natale. 2022. Ideal technologies, ideal women: AI and gender imaginaries in Redditors’ discussions on the Replika bot girlfriend.Media, Culture & Society45, 4 (2022), 720–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221119021

    work page doi:10.1177/01634437221119021 2022

  16. [16]

    How Does Collective Self-esteem Influence Confrontational Be- haviors and Emotional Responses in Human-AI Competition?

    Ray Djufril, Jessica R. Frampton, and Silvia Knobloch-Westerwick. 2025. Love, marriage, pregnancy: Commitment processes in romantic relationships with AI chatbots.Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans4 (May 2025), 100155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100155

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100155 2025

  17. [17]

    Duran and Lynne Kelly

    Robert L. Duran and Lynne Kelly. 2017. Knapp’s Model of Relational Development in the Digital Age.Iowa Journal of Communication49, 1 (2017), 22–45. https://scholarworks.uni.edu/ijc/vol49/iss1/5

    work page 2017

  18. [18]

    Döring, T

    N. Döring, T. Le, L. M. Vowels, et al. 2025. The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Human Sexuality: A Five-Year Literature Review 2020–2024. Current Sexual Health Reports17 (2025), 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11930-024-00397-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11930-024-00397-y 2025

  19. [19]

    A Shaji George, AS Hovan George, T Baskar, and Digvijay Pandey. 2023. The allure of artificial intimacy: Examining the appeal and ethics of using generative AI for simulated relationships.Partners Universal International Innovation Journal1, 6 (2023), 132–147

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Clare Grogan, Jackie Kay, and María Pérez-Ortiz. 2025. AI Will Always Love You: Studying Implicit Biases in Romantic AI Companions. https: //doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.20231 arXiv:2502.20231 [cs]. Manuscript submitted to ACM 22 Tyler Chang, Jina Huh–Yoo, and Afsaneh Razi

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.20231 2025

  21. [21]

    Rose E Guingrich and Michael S. A. Graziano. 2025. Chatbots as Social Companions: How People Perceive Consciousness, Human Likeness, and Social Health Benefits in Machines. InOxford Intersections: AI in Society, Philipp Hacker (Ed.). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/ 9780198945215.003.0011 Oxford, online edition

    work page 2025

  22. [22]

    Thilo Hagendorff. 2020. The Ethics of AI Ethics: An Evaluation of Guidelines.Minds and Machines30, 1 (March 2020), 99–120. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11023-020-09517-8

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Replika removing erotic role-play is like grand theft auto removing guns or cars

    Kenneth R Hanson and Hannah Bolthouse. 2024. “Replika removing erotic role-play is like grand theft auto removing guns or cars”: Reddit discourse on artificial intelligence chatbots and sexual technologies.Socius10 (2024), 23780231241259627

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    Marti A Hearst. 1992. Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text corpora. InCOLING 1992 volume 2: The 14th international conference on computational linguistics

    work page 1992

  25. [25]

    2025.AI Romance and Misogyny: A Speech Act Analysis

    A G Holdier and Kelly Weirich. 2025.AI Romance and Misogyny: A Speech Act Analysis. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/ 9780198945215.003.0074

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    Forever and Always, My Love

    Jamie Jana Jocher and Roland Verwiebe. 2026. “Forever and Always, My Love”: Emotions in Human–AI Romantic Relationship Building and Breakup With Generative AI Chatbot Replika.Social Media+ Society12, 1 (2026), 20563051251408917

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    Ayanna Julien. 2023. Knapp’s Relationship Model. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/psychology/knapps-relationship-model#full-article [Accessed 04-03-2026]

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    Emily J. Kahlow. 2024. Beyond the Surface: Reddit’s Anonymity Facilitates Deeper Disclosure Compared to Facebook.International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning14, 1 (2024). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJCBPL.343629

    work page doi:10.4018/ijcbpl.343629 2024

  29. [29]

    KTA Sandeeshwara Kasturiratna and Andree Hartanto. 2025. Attachment to Artificial Intelligence: Development of the AI Attachment Scale, Construct Validation, and the Psychological Mechanisms of Human–AI Attachment.Computers in Human Behavior Reports(2025), 100912

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Maria Kędzierska, Mikołaj Spytek, Marcelina Kurek, Jan Sawicki, Maria Ganzha, and Marcin Paprzycki. 2023. Topic modeling applied to Reddit posts. InInternational Conference on Big Data Analytics. Springer, 17–44

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Mark L. Knapp. 1978.Social Intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Allyn and Bacon

    work page 1978

  32. [32]

    MARK L Knapp and Anita L Vangelisti. 2005. Relationship stages: A communication perspective.Interpersonal communication and human relationships(2005), 36–49

    work page 2005

  33. [33]

    , author De Bonis, G

    Jun-Bin Koh. 2023. “Date me date me”: AI chatbot interactions as a resource for the online construction of masculinity.Discourse, Context & Media 52 (2023), 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100681

    work page doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2023.100681 2023

  34. [34]

    Amanda Lagerkvist. 2024. Yearning for a You: Faith, doubt and relational expectancy in existential communication with chatbots in a world on edge. MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research40, 76 (Aug. 2024), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.7146/mk.v40i76.141132 Number: 76

    work page doi:10.7146/mk.v40i76.141132 2024

  35. [35]

    Huiqian Lai. 2025. Can LLMs Talk ’Sex’? Exploring How AI Models Handle Intimate Conversations. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.05514 arXiv:2506.05514 [cs]

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.05514 2025

  36. [36]

    Minha Lee, Lily Frank, Yvonne De Kort, and Wijnand IJsselsteijn. 2022. Where is Vincent? Expanding our emotional selves with AI. InProceedings of the 4th Conference on Conversational User Interfaces(Glasgow, United Kingdom)(CUI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 19, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543829.3543835

    work page doi:10.1145/3543829.3543835 2022

  37. [37]

    Jindong Leo-Liu. 2023. Loving a “defiant” AI companion? The gender performance and ethics of social exchange robots in simulated intimate interactions.Computers in Human Behavior141 (2023), 107620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107620

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107620 2023

  38. [38]

    Han Li and Renwen Zhang. 2024. Finding love in algorithms: Deciphering the emotional contexts of close encounters with AI chatbots.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication29, 5 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Tony Liao, Debriunna Porter, and Elizabeth Rodwell. 2023. Artificial love: Revolutions in how AI and AR embodied romantic chatbots can move through relationship stages.AoIR Selected Papers of Internet Research(2023)

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Tony Liao, Elizabeth Rodwell, and Debriunna Porter. 2024. Media frames, AI romantic relationships, and the perspectives of people in relationships; mapping and comparing news media themes with user perspectives.Information, Communication & Society27, 12 (Sept. 2024), 2314–2332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2024.2420031

    work page doi:10.1080/1369118x.2024.2420031 2024

  41. [41]

    Liberati

    N. Liberati. 2022. Digital Intimacy in China and Japan.Human Studies46 (2022), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-022-09631-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10746-022-09631-9 2022

  42. [42]

    Siyu Ma and Mayu Koike. 2025. Becoming human: How perceived anthropomorphism and authenticity influence romantic attractiveness of chat agents.International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction41, 22 (2025), 14162–14175

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Malfacini

    K. Malfacini. 2025. The impacts of companion AI on human relationships: risks, benefits, and design considerations.AI & Society(2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02318-6 Advance online publication

    work page doi:10.1007/s00146-025-02318-6 2025

  44. [44]

    Maples, M

    B. Maples, M. Cerit, A. Vishwanath, et al. 2024. Loneliness and suicide mitigation for students using GPT3-enabled chatbots.npj Mental Health Research3 (2024), 4. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s44184-023-00047-6 2024

  45. [45]

    Bradford Wilcox, and Kelsey Kaye

    Brian Mark, W. Bradford Wilcox, and Kelsey Kaye. 2024.Counterfeit Connections: The Rise of AI Romantic Companions. Technical Report. Wheatley Institute and Institute for Family Studies. https://brightspotcdn.byu.edu/a6/a1/c3036cf14686accdae72a4861dd1/counterfeit-connections-report.pdf Accessed: 2025-08-25

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Match.com. 2024. Singles in America. https://www.singlesinamerica.com/ Annual study on the attitudes and behaviors of single Americans. Accessed: 2025-08-25

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Mike Mintz, Steven Bills, Rion Snow, and Dan Jurafsky. 2009. Distant supervision for relation extraction without labeled data. InProceedings of the Joint Conference of the 47th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 4th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the AFNLP. Manuscript submitted to ACM Technically Love 23 1003–1011

    work page 2009

  48. [48]

    Noelia Muñoz-Fernández, Virginia Sánchez-Jiménez, María-Luisa Rodríguez-deArriba, Lydia Nacimiento-Rodríguez, Paz Elipe, and Rosario Del Rey

    work page

  49. [49]

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22069

    Traditional and Cyber Dating Violence among Adolescents: Profiles, Prevalence, and Short-Term Associations with Peer Violence.Aggressive Behavior49, 3 (2023), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22069

    work page doi:10.1002/ab.22069 2023

  50. [50]

    Mohammad Namvarpour, Brandon Brofsky, Jessica Medina, Mamtaj Akter, and Afsaneh Razi. 2025. Understanding Teen Overreliance on AI Companion Chatbots Through Self-Reported Reddit Narratives.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.15783(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Mohammad Namvarpour and Afsaneh Razi. 2024. Uncovering Contradictions in Human-AI Interactions: Lessons Learned from User Reviews of Replika. InCompanion Publication of the 2024 Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW Companion ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 579–586. https://doi.org/10.11...

    work page doi:10.1145/3678884.3681909 2024

  52. [52]

    Mohammad (Matt) Namvarpour, Harrison Pauwels, and Afsaneh Razi. 2025. AI-induced sexual harassment: Investigating Contextual Characteristics and User Reactions of Sexual Harassment by a Companion Chatbot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04299. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.04299 Accepted for publication at CSCW 2025

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.04299 2025

  53. [53]

    Shuyi Pan and Yi Mou. 2024. Constructing the meaning of human–<scp>AI</scp> romantic relationships from the perspectives of users dating the social chatbot Replika.Personal Relationships31, 4 (Sept. 2024), 1090–1112. https://doi.org/10.1111/pere.12572

    work page doi:10.1111/pere.12572 2024

  54. [54]

    Elliot Panek, Connor Hollenbach, Jinjie Yang, and Tyler Rhodes. 2017. Growth and inequality of participation in online communities: A longitudinal analysis. InProceedings of the 8th International Conference on Social Media & Society. 1–5

    work page 2017

  55. [55]

    Patrick Pantel and Marco Pennacchiotti. 2006. Espresso: Leveraging generic patterns for automatically harvesting semantic relations. InProceedings of the 21st international conference on computational linguistics and 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 113–120

    work page 2006

  56. [56]

    My Boyfriend is AI

    Pat Pataranutaporn, Sheer Karny, Chayapatr Archiwaranguprok, Constanze Albrecht, Auren R. Liu, and Pattie Maes. 2025. "My Boyfriend is AI": A Computational Analysis of Human-AI Companionship in Reddit’s AI Community. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2509.11391

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.11391 2025

  57. [57]

    I’m not experienced. . . please send advice

    Morgan E PettyJohn, Kyla M Cary, Erin Nolen, and Toni A Gallegos. 2025. “I’m not experienced. . . please send advice”: teens seeking information and advice about sexual behaviors on Reddit.The Journal of Sex Research62, 7 (2025), 1186–1197

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    Elizabeth Pleasants, Ndola Prata, Ushma D Upadhyay, Cassondra Marshall, and Coye Cheshire. 2025. Using Natural Language Processing to Describe the Use of an Online Community for Abortion During 2022: Dynamic Topic Modeling Analysis of Reddit Posts.JMIR infodemiology5, 1 (2025), e72771

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Vaidyeswaran Rajaraman. 2023. From ELIZA to ChatGPT: history of human-computer conversation.Resonance28, 6 (2023), 889–905

    work page 2023

  60. [60]

    Alexander Ratner, Stephen H Bach, Henry Ehrenberg, Jason Fries, Sen Wu, and Christopher Ré. 2017. Snorkel: Rapid training data creation with weak supervision. InProceedings of the VLDB endowment. International conference on very large data bases, Vol. 11. 269

    work page 2017

  61. [61]

    Shivani Reddy P, Aaron John, and Shaurya Kaushik. 2025. AI As Romantic Companion- an Ethical Dilemma. (2025). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn. 5106936

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn 2025

  62. [62]

    Tsameret Ricon. 2024. How chatbots perceive sexting by adolescents.Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans2, 1 (Jan. 2024), 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100068

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100068 2024

  63. [63]

    Tsameret Ricon. 2025. AI and Adolescent Relationships: Bridging emotional intelligence and practical guidance.Computers in Human Behavior Reports19 (2025), 100752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100752

    work page doi:10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100752 2025

  64. [64]

    Ellen Riloff. 1996. Automatically generating extraction patterns from untagged text. InProceedings of the national conference on artificial intelligence. 1044–1049

    work page 1996

  65. [65]

    Ellen Riloff, Rosie Jones, et al. 1999. Learning dictionaries for information extraction by multi-level bootstrapping. InAAAI/IAAI. 474–479

    work page 1999

  66. [66]

    Ellen Riloff and Janyce Wiebe. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. InProceedings of the 2003 conference on Empirical methods in natural language processing. 105–112

    work page 2003

  67. [67]

    Katherine Rodger and Evelyn F Field. 2025. You and I plus AI: A qualitative exploration of replika in the context of human relationships.The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality34, 3 (2025), 398–411

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    Renee Shelby, Shalaleh Rismani, Kathryn Henne, AJung Moon, Negar Rostamzadeh, Paul Nicholas, N’Mah Yilla-Akbari, Jess Gallegos, Andrew Smart, Emilio Garcia, and Gurleen Virk. 2023. Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reduction. InProceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES ’23). Associa...

    work page doi:10.1145/3600211.3604673 2023

  69. [69]

    Jo Stuthridge. 2010. Script or scripture.Life scripts: A transactional analysis of unconscious relational patterns(2010), 73–100

    work page 2010

  70. [70]

    William B Swann Jr and JK Bosson. 2008. Identity negotiation.Handbook of personality: Theory and research448 (2008)

    work page 2008

  71. [71]

    Michael Thelen and Ellen Riloff. 2002. A bootstrapping method for learning semantic lexicons using extraction pattern contexts. InProceedings of the 2002 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP 2002). 214–221

    work page 2002

  72. [72]

    Stella Ting-Toomey. 2005. Identity negotiation theory: Crossing cultural boundaries.Theorizing about intercultural communication387 (2005)

    work page 2005

  73. [73]

    Pat Treusch. 2020. Re-reading ELIZA: Human–machine Interaction as cognitive sense-ability. InFeminist Technoecologies. Routledge, 61–76

    work page 2020

  74. [74]

    Sezai Tunca. 2025. Tracing the evolving discourse of sexual technology: A longitudinal analysis of emotional, ethical, and technological narratives on Reddit.Sociology Compass19, 8 (2025), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.70110

    work page doi:10.1111/soc4.70110 2025

  75. [75]

    Jan-Peter Voß, Adrian Smith, and John Grin. 2009. Designing long-term policy: rethinking transition management.Policy sciences42, 4 (2009), 275–302. Manuscript submitted to ACM 24 Tyler Chang, Jina Huh–Yoo, and Afsaneh Razi

    work page 2009

  76. [76]

    Skyler Wang and Marco Dehnert. 2026. On-Demand Intimacy: The Sociotechnical Appeal of AI Companions.Social Media+ Society12, 1 (2026), 20563051251410394

    work page 2026

  77. [77]

    Xuetong Wang, Ching Christie Pang, and Pan Hui. 2025. ‘My Dataset of Love’: A Preliminary Mixed-Method Exploration of Human-AI Romantic Relationships.Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact.9, 7, Article CSCW351 (Oct. 2025), 34 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3757532

    work page doi:10.1145/3757532 2025

  78. [78]

    Joseph Weizenbaum. 1966. ELIZA—a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine.Commun. ACM9, 1 (1966), 36–45

    work page 1966

  79. [79]

    Carroll, Carson R

    Brian J Willoughby, Jason S. Carroll, Carson R. Dover, and Rebekah H. Hakala. 2025. Counterfeit Connections: The Rise of Romantic AI Compan- ions and AI Sexualized Media Among the Rising Generation. https://brightspotcdn.byu.edu/a6/a1/c3036cf14686accdae72a4861dd1/counterfeit- connections-report.pdf

    work page 2025

  80. [80]

    Lars Wissler, Mohammed Almashraee, Dagmar Monett Díaz, and Adrian Paschke. 2014. The Gold Standard in Corpus Annotation.IEEE GSC21 (2014)

    work page 2014

Showing first 80 references.