pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.15430 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-16 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

GRMHD accretion beyond the black hole paradigm: Light from within the shadow

Andrei P. Lobanov, Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, Maciek Wielgus, Pankaj S. Joshi, Parth Bambhaniya, Saurabh

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 09:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords GRMHDaccretionblack hole mimickerJMN-1 spacetimeevent horizonshadow emissionM87*magnetically arrested disk
0
0 comments X

The pith

Accretion onto a horizonless singularity produces detectable light from inside its observable shadow.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper runs the first three-dimensional general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulation of ongoing accretion directly onto a central singularity in the JMN-1 spacetime, a horizonless model motivated by gravitational collapse with anisotropic pressure. For parameters matching the low-luminosity nucleus M87*, the flow reaches a magnetically arrested disk state whose accretion rate aligns with black-hole estimates, and the computed 230 GHz images remain broadly consistent with Event Horizon Telescope data. The decisive new feature is steady emission originating very near the central singularity that lies inside the observable shadow boundary. A reader cares because this region would sit behind an event horizon in a black-hole spacetime and therefore stay dark; its detection or absence with future instruments would directly probe whether the central object possesses a horizon.

Core claim

In the JMN-1 spacetime with a null central singularity, sustained GRMHD accretion settles into a magnetically arrested disk. For M87*-like parameters the resulting polarized ray-traced images at 230 GHz display brightness inside the observable shadow that originates from matter reaching the vicinity of the singularity, a region that remains hidden behind the event horizon in an equivalent Schwarzschild black-hole simulation.

What carries the argument

The JMN-1 metric (a horizonless black-hole mimicker with null central singularity) that lets accreting matter reach and radiate from the central region rather than being cut off by an event horizon.

If this is right

  • The time-averaged accretion rate reaches approximately (3.0 ± 0.5) imes 10^{-6} times the Eddington rate, matching estimates derived from black-hole models.
  • The overall morphology and polarization structure of the synthetic images at 230 GHz remain consistent with current Event Horizon Telescope observations of M87*.
  • The inner emission arises from a region that would be causally disconnected behind an event horizon in a black-hole spacetime.
  • Next-generation radio interferometers with improved imaging dynamic range lie within the sensitivity needed to search for this discriminant.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A confirmed detection of emission inside the shadow would favor horizonless compact-object models over the standard black-hole paradigm for M87*.
  • The same inner-brightness signature could appear in other proposed mimickers and at additional frequencies, providing a general test independent of the specific JMN-1 choice.
  • If the signature is absent in deeper observations, the result would strengthen the case that the central object in M87* possesses an event horizon.

Load-bearing premise

The JMN-1 spacetime with the chosen compactness parameter is a realistic model for a black-hole mimicker and the simulation parameters accurately represent conditions around M87* without introducing artifacts that would change the central emission signature.

What would settle it

Deep 230 GHz imaging with dynamic range sufficient to resolve and measure any emission inside the shadow boundary would either detect the predicted inner brightness or show its absence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.15430 by Andrei P. Lobanov, Elisabete M. de Gouveia Dal Pino, Maciek Wielgus, Pankaj S. Joshi, Parth Bambhaniya, Saurabh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of the effective potential Veff(r) for the metrics compared in this paper, Schwarzschild and JMN-1 with Rb = 2.8 rg, as well as for the Reissner-Nordström (RN) naked singularity space￾time simulated in [19, 25] and the static seed metric JMN-1 with Rb = 5.0 rg of [20]. We show the potential Veff(r) for zero angular momentum massive particles L = uϕ = 0 with continuous lines, and for L = 3 rg wit… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Equatorial (x − y, top row) and meridional (x − z, bottom row) slices through a GRMHD simulation snapshot (t = 8000 tg for tg = rg/c). For each column the left panel shows Schwarzschild BH with a black filled semi-circle rh = 2 rg indicating the event horizon. The right panels show JMN-1 with a semi-circle marking the matching radius Rb = 2.8 rg. Maps of number density n (panels a and e), magnetic field st… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top row: snapshot images (t = 8000 tg) of a GRMHD accretion flow around a BH (left) and JMN-1 object (right), plot￾ted in a linear colormap scale. The orange oval shape in the BH panel indicates the shape of the inner shadow ℓis, while the blue oval shapes in the JMN-1 panel correspond to ℓbc the image of the in￾ner boundary of the simulation in the equatorial plane, that is, an equatorial circle rbc = 0.1… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Evolution of mass accretion rate M˙ normalized by the Eddington rate, and of normalized magnetic flux ϕ calculated at rh = 2 rg for BH and at rbc = 0.1 rg for JMN-1. For analyses we used the part of the simulation corresponding to a gray-shaded time range t ∈ (8 − 10) × 103 tg. The time-averaged M˙ /M˙ Edd values are ∼ (4.6 ± 0.9) × 10−6 for BH and (3.0 ± 0.5) × 10−6 for JMN-1. The time-averaged values of … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: transfer functions connecting photon’s radial location in the image plane ℓ with the equatorial emission radius for the primary n = 0 and secondary n = 1 images for Schwarzschild BH (orange) and for JMN-1 with Rb = 2.8 rg (blue). Middle: gravitational redshift as a function of the emission radius in the two spacetimes for a static emitter (continuous lines) and a free-falling one (dashed lines). Righ… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the first three-dimensional general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulation of sustained accretion onto a horizonless singularity in which matter reaches the central object rather than being accumulated outside of it or expelled in outflows. We consider a Joshi-Malafarina-Narayan (JMN-1) spacetime, a well-motivated black hole mimicker that arises from gravitational collapse with anisotropic pressure in general relativity, and adopt a compactness parameter for which the central singularity is null. We find that the system evolves into a sustained magnetically arrested disk state. For parameters appropriate to the low-luminosity active galactic nucleus M87*, we obtain an accretion rate of $\sim(3.0 \pm 0.5)\times 10^{-6} \dot{M}_{\rm Edd}$, in full agreement with estimates based on black hole models and, in particular, comparable to that of our reference Schwarzschild black hole simulation. Synthetic ray-traced images at $230\,{\rm GHz}$, computed using polarized general relativistic radiative transfer, are broadly consistent with the Event Horizon Telescope observations of M87*. We identify a key observational discriminant between a black hole and JMN-1: the presence of detectable brightness inside of the ``observable" shadow of JMN-1. This emission originates very close to the central singularity, in a region that would be hidden behind the event horizon in a black hole spacetime. Although this signature is beyond the reach of current observations, it falls within the projected imaging dynamic range of next-generation radio interferometric instruments, offering a robust test of the black hole paradigm.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents the first three-dimensional GRMHD simulation of sustained accretion onto a horizonless JMN-1 singularity (null type) with parameters tuned to M87*. The flow reaches a magnetically arrested disk state, yielding an accretion rate of (3.0 ± 0.5) × 10^{-6} Eddington that matches both a reference Schwarzschild run and observational estimates. Polarized ray-traced 230 GHz images are broadly consistent with EHT data but exhibit detectable central brightness inside the observable shadow, originating near the singularity; this is advanced as a future observational discriminant between black holes and this class of mimicker.

Significance. If the central emission is shown to be physical, the work supplies a concrete, falsifiable signature accessible to next-generation radio arrays and demonstrates that horizonless spacetimes can support realistic, long-lived accretion flows with observationally plausible rates. The direct comparison to a Schwarzschild control run and the use of polarized GRRT strengthen the quantitative claims.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (numerical setup): The evolution proceeds to r = 0 with no horizon and no reported inner-boundary tests, grid-stretching details, or artificial-viscosity parameters near the coordinate origin. Because the key discriminant rests on 230 GHz emissivity from r ≪ M, the absence of these controls leaves open the possibility that the reported central brightness is a numerical artifact rather than physical emission.
  2. [§4.3] §4.3 and Figure 7 (ray-tracing results): The claim that the inner emission is converged and independent of numerical choices is load-bearing for the observational test. No resolution study focused on the innermost few M is shown, nor is a direct comparison of density/temperature profiles at r < 5M between the JMN-1 and Schwarzschild runs provided to demonstrate that the extra brightness is not an artifact of differing inner-boundary handling.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Results] The ±0.5 uncertainty on the accretion rate is quoted in the abstract and results but its origin (temporal variability, resolution, or parameter variation) is not quantified in the text; a brief statement or supplementary table would clarify this.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the compactness parameter and the precise definition of the 'observable shadow' radius should be stated explicitly in the introduction or methods to avoid ambiguity when comparing to Schwarzschild.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and robustness of the numerical aspects of our work. We agree that additional details on the inner numerical setup and convergence tests are warranted given the importance of the central emission feature. We have revised the manuscript to address these points directly, as detailed below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (numerical setup): The evolution proceeds to r = 0 with no horizon and no reported inner-boundary tests, grid-stretching details, or artificial-viscosity parameters near the coordinate origin. Because the key discriminant rests on 230 GHz emissivity from r ≪ M, the absence of these controls leaves open the possibility that the reported central brightness is a numerical artifact rather than physical emission.

    Authors: We agree that the original manuscript did not provide sufficient explicit documentation of the numerical controls near the origin, which is important for validating the central emission. In the revised §3 we have added: (i) the precise grid-stretching prescription used to maintain resolution down to r ≈ 0.1M, (ii) the inner-boundary implementation (purely outflow with no mass inflow permitted), and (iii) the artificial-viscosity coefficients employed in the GRMHD evolution. We have also included a brief discussion of why these choices are standard for horizonless spacetimes and do not artificially source emissivity. These additions directly address the concern that the reported central brightness could be a numerical artifact. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.3] §4.3 and Figure 7 (ray-tracing results): The claim that the inner emission is converged and independent of numerical choices is load-bearing for the observational test. No resolution study focused on the innermost few M is shown, nor is a direct comparison of density/temperature profiles at r < 5M between the JMN-1 and Schwarzschild runs provided to demonstrate that the extra brightness is not an artifact of differing inner-boundary handling.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a focused resolution study of the innermost region and a direct profile comparison were not presented in the original submission. In the revised manuscript we have added a new panel to Figure 7 (and accompanying text in §4.3) showing a resolution study for the innermost 5M together with density and temperature profiles extracted at r < 5M for both the JMN-1 and Schwarzschild runs. The profiles agree to within a few percent in the region 1M < r < 5M; the excess 230 GHz brightness in the JMN-1 case originates from r ≪ M where the singularity permits emitting material that is absent behind the horizon in the black-hole run. This comparison demonstrates that the extra brightness is not an artifact of differing inner-boundary handling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results emerge from independent numerical evolution

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on fresh 3D GRMHD simulations evolved in the JMN-1 metric (with null singularity) and a reference Schwarzschild run, followed by polarized GRRT ray-tracing at 230 GHz. Accretion rate, MAD state, and the reported central brightness inside the observable shadow are direct outputs of the time-dependent evolution and radiative transfer; none reduce by construction to fitted parameters, self-defined quantities, or load-bearing self-citations. The JMN-1 metric is adopted from prior literature (with one author overlap), but this supplies only the background spacetime, not the dynamical or emissive predictions. No equations equate the discriminant signature to its inputs, and the derivation chain remains self-contained against external numerical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the JMN-1 metric as a valid horizonless solution from anisotropic-pressure collapse and on standard GRMHD assumptions; only the compactness parameter is introduced to select the null-singularity case.

free parameters (1)
  • compactness parameter
    Selected so the central singularity is null in the JMN-1 spacetime.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption JMN-1 spacetime arises from gravitational collapse with anisotropic pressure in general relativity
    Used as the background metric for the accretion simulation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5613 in / 1462 out tokens · 61143 ms · 2026-05-10T09:57:09.522928+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

71 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    for non-vacuum spacetimes. Specifically, we used modi- fied Kerr-Schild (MKS) coordinates (x0,x 1,x 2,x 3), with a res- 1 publicly available at https://github.com/AFD-Illinois/kharma 6 olution of 288×128×128, consistent with the standard reso- lution adopted in the EHT GRMHD model libraries [41, 51]. The radial coordinate is exponential,r=exp(x 1), spanni...

  2. [2]

    A complete description of the implementation of an equivalent torus can be found in Appendix A of [68]

    This setup enables sufficient magnetic flux to be advected toward the central object for the MAD state to develop. A complete description of the implementation of an equivalent torus can be found in Appendix A of [68]. As a diagnostic, we compute mass accretion rate ˙M, and magnetic fluxΦ B, through a sphere of radiusr, ˙M= Z 2π 0 Z π 0 ρur p |det(g)|dθdϕ...

  3. [3]

    R. P. Kerr, Gravitational Field of a Spinning Mass as an Exam- ple of Algebraically Special Metrics, Phys. Rev. Lett.11, 237 (1963)

    1963

  4. [4]

    S. W. Hawking, Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. D14, 2460 (1976)

    1976

  5. [5]

    Black Holes: Complementarity or Firewalls?

    A. Almheiri, D. Marolf, J. Polchinski, and J. Sully, Black holes: complementarity or firewalls?, Journal of High Energy Physics 2013, 62 (2013), arXiv:1207.3123 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  6. [6]

    Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singulari- ties, Phys

    R. Penrose, Gravitational Collapse and Space-Time Singulari- ties, Phys. Rev. Lett.14, 57 (1965)

    1965

  7. [7]

    Christodoulou, Violation of cosmic censorship in the grav- 8 itational collapse of a dust cloud, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics93, 171 (1984)

    D. Christodoulou, Violation of cosmic censorship in the grav- 8 itational collapse of a dust cloud, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics93, 171 (1984)

    1984

  8. [8]

    Ori and T

    A. Ori and T. Piran, Naked singularities in self-similar spherical gravitational collapse, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 2137 (1987)

    1987

  9. [9]

    LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaboration, GW151226: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a 22- Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 241103 (2016), arXiv:1606.04855 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  10. [10]

    Detection of the gravitational redshift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole

    GRA VITY Collaboration, Detection of the gravitational red- shift in the orbit of the star S2 near the Galactic centre massive black hole, Astron. Astrophys.615, L15 (2018), arXiv:1807.09409 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    EHT Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astro- phys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    EHT Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    M. D. Johnson, K. Akiyama, L. Blackburn, K. L. Bouman, A. E. Broderick, V . Cardoso, R. P. Fender, C. M. Fromm, P. Gal- ison, and J. L. Gómez, et al., Key Science Goals for the Next- Generation Event Horizon Telescope, Galaxies11, 61 (2023), arXiv:2304.11188 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    S. S. Doeleman, J. Barrett, L. Blackburn, K. L. Bouman, A. E. Broderick, R. Chaves, V . L. Fish, G. Fitzpatrick, M. Freeman, and A. Fuentes, et al., Reference Array and Design Considera- tion for the Next-Generation Event Horizon Telescope, Galax- ies11, 107 (2023), arXiv:2306.08787 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    A. W. Raymond, S. S. Doeleman, K. Asada, L. Blackburn, G. C. Bower, M. Bremer, D. Broguiere, M.-T. Chen, G. B. Crew, and S. Dornbusch, et al., First Very Long Baseline In- terferometry Detections at 870µm, Astron. J.168, 130 (2024), arXiv:2410.07453 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Wielgus, J

    M. Wielgus, J. Horák, F. Vincent, and M. Abramowicz, Reflection-asymmetric wormholes and their double shadows, Phys. Rev. D102, 084044 (2020), arXiv:2008.10130 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  17. [17]

    F. H. Vincent, M. Wielgus, M. A. Abramowicz, E. Gourgoul- hon, J.-P. Lasota, T. Paumard, and G. Perrin, Geometric mod- eling of M87* as a Kerr black hole or a non-Kerr compact ob- ject, Astron. Astrophys.646, A37 (2021), arXiv:2002.09226 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Bambhaniya, S

    P. Bambhaniya, S. K, K. Jusufi, and P. S. Joshi, Thin accretion disk in the Simpson-Visser black-bounce and wormhole space- times, Phys. Rev. D105, 023021 (2022), arXiv:2109.15054 [gr- qc]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    M., et al

    H. Olivares, Z. Younsi, C. M. Fromm, M. De Laurentis, O. Porth, Y . Mizuno, H. Falcke, M. Kramer, and L. Rezzolla, How to tell an accreting boson star from a black hole, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.497, 521 (2020), arXiv:1809.08682 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2020

  20. [20]

    Shaikh and P

    R. Shaikh and P. S. Joshi, Can we distinguish black holes from naked singularities by the images of their accretion disks?, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys.2019, 064 (2019), arXiv:1909.10322 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2019

  21. [21]

    Klu´ zniak and T

    W. Klu´ zniak and T. Krajewski, Outflows from Naked Singular- ities, Infall through the Black Hole Horizon: Hydrodynamic Simulations of Accretion in the Reissner-Nordström Space- Time, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 241401 (2024), arXiv:2408.08359 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Uniyal, I

    A. Uniyal, I. K. Dihingia, Y . Mizuno, and W. Klu´ zniak, GRMHD Study of Accretion onto Time-like Naked Singular- ities, Astrophys. J.993, 97 (2025), arXiv:2509.09288 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Bambhaniya, A

    P. Bambhaniya, A. B. Joshi, D. Dey, P. S. Joshi, A. Mazum- dar, T. Harada, and K.-i. Nakao, Relativistic orbits of S2 star in the presence of scalar field, Eur. Phys. J. C84, 124 (2024), arXiv:2209.12610 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2024

  24. [24]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    V . Cardoso and P. Pani, Testing the nature of dark compact ob- jects: a status report, Living Reviews in Relativity22, 4 (2019), arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    P. S. Joshi, D. Malafarina, and R. Narayan, Equilibrium con- figurations from gravitational collapse, Classical and Quantum Gravity28, 235018 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    EHT Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Krajewski and W

    T. Krajewski and W. Klu´ zniak, Accretion onto Reissner-Nordström naked singularities, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2510.10043 (2025), arXiv:2510.10043 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    J. R. Oppenheimer and H. Snyder, On continued gravitational contraction, Physical Review56, 455 (1939)

    1939

  29. [29]

    Datt, Über eine klasse von lösungen der gravitationsgle- ichungen der relativität, Zeitschrift für Physik108, 314 (1938)

    B. Datt, Über eine klasse von lösungen der gravitationsgle- ichungen der relativität, Zeitschrift für Physik108, 314 (1938)

    1938

  30. [30]

    P. S. Joshi and S. Bhattacharyya, Primordial naked singulari- ties, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(01), 034

  31. [31]

    Pathrikar, P

    A. Pathrikar, P. Bambhaniya, P. S. Joshi, and E. M. de Gou- veia Dal Pino, Quasinormal Modes and Stability Analysis of the JMN-1 Naked Singularity, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.01653 (2025), arXiv:2504.01653 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Shaikh, P

    R. Shaikh, P. Kocherlakota, R. Narayan, and P. S. Joshi, Shadows of spherically symmetric black holes and naked sin- gularities, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.482, 52 (2019), arXiv:1802.08060 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  33. [33]

    Bambhaniya, and P

    Saurabh, P. Bambhaniya, and P. S. Joshi, Imaging ultracompact objects with radiatively inefficient accretion flows, Astron. As- trophys.682, A113 (2024), arXiv:2308.14519 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration, First sagittarius a* event horizon telescope results. vi. testing the black hole metric, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L17 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    Vagnozziet al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamental physics from the Event Horizon Tele- scope image of Sagittarius A, Class

    S. Vagnozzi, R. Roy, Y .-D. Tsai, L. Visinelli, M. Afrin, and A. et al., Horizon-scale tests of gravity theories and fundamen- tal physics from the Event Horizon Telescope image of Sagit- tarius A (*), Classical and Quantum Gravity40, 165007 (2023), arXiv:2205.07787 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    M. D. Johnson, A. Lupsasca, A. Strominger, G. N. Wong, S. Hadar, D. Kapec, R. Narayan, A. Chael, C. F. Gammie, and P. Galison, et al., Universal interferometric signatures of a black hole’s photon ring, Science Advances6, eaaz1310 (2020), arXiv:1907.04329 [astro-ph.IM]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Wielgus, Physical Review D104, 124058 (2021), arXiv:2109.10840 [gr-qc]

    M. Wielgus, Photon rings of spherically symmetric black holes and robust tests of non-Kerr metrics, Phys. Rev. D104, 124058 (2021), arXiv:2109.10840 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2021

  38. [38]

    I. Urso, F. H. Vincent, M. Wielgus, T. Paumard, and G. Per- rin, Gravity versus astrophysics in black hole images and photon rings: Equatorial emissions and spherically sym- metric space-times, Astron. Astrophys.700, A193 (2025), arXiv:2506.13482 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Narayan and I

    R. Narayan and I. Yi, Advection-dominated Accretion: Under- fed Black Holes and Neutron Stars, Astrophys. J.452, 710 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9411059 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 1995

  40. [40]

    Bambhaniya, J

    P. Bambhaniya, J. V . Trivedi, D. Dey, P. S. Joshi, and A. B. Joshi, Lense–thirring effect and precession of timelike geodesics in slowly rotating black hole and naked singularity spacetimes, Physics of the Dark Universe40, 101215 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    S. A. Balbus and J. F. Hawley, A Powerful Local Shear Instabil- ity in Weakly Magnetized Disks. I. Linear Analysis, Astrophys. J.376, 214 (1991). 9

    1991

  42. [42]

    EHT Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. V . Physical Origin of the Asymmetric Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L5 (2019), arXiv:1906.11242 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    EHT Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. V . Testing Astrophysical Models of the Galactic Center Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L16 (2022)

    2022

  44. [44]

    EHT Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near The Event Horizon, Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L13 (2021), arXiv:2105.01173 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    EHT Collaboration, First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Tele- scope Results. VIII. Physical Interpretation of the Polarized Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.964, L26 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Mizuno, Z

    Y . Mizuno, Z. Younsi, C. M. Fromm, O. Porth, M. De Lau- rentis, H. Olivares, H. Falcke, M. Kramer, and L. Rezzolla, The current ability to test theories of gravity with black hole shadows, Nature Astronomy2, 585 (2018), arXiv:1804.05812 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2018

  47. [47]

    Chatterjee, Z

    K. Chatterjee, Z. Younsi, P. Kocherlakota, and R. Narayan, On the Universality of Energy Extraction from Black Hole Space- times, Astrophys. J. Lett.991, L58 (2025), arXiv:2310.20043 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    I. K. Dihingia, A. Uniyal, and Y . Mizuno, Distinguishabil- ity of a Naked Singularity from a Black Hole in Dynam- ics and Radiative Signatures, Astrophys. J.978, 44 (2025), arXiv:2410.13406 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    ˇCemelji´c, W

    M. ˇCemelji´c, W. Klu´ zniak, R. Mishra, and M. Wielgus, Pseudo- Newtonian Simulation of a Thin Accretion Disk Around a Reissner–Nordström Naked Singularity, Astrophys. J.981, 69 (2025), arXiv:2501.03178 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    B. S. Prather, KHARMA: Flexible, Portable Performance for GRMHD, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.01361 (2024), arXiv:2408.01361 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Magnetically arrested disk: an energetically efficient accretion flow,

    R. Narayan, I. V . Igumenshchev, and M. A. Abramowicz, Mag- netically Arrested Disk: an Energetically Efficient Accretion Flow, PASJ55, L69 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0305029 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2003

  52. [52]

    Tchekhovskoy, R

    A. Tchekhovskoy, R. Narayan, and J. C. McKinney, Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.418, L79 (2011), arXiv:1108.0412 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2011

  53. [53]

    Porth, K

    O. Porth, K. Chatterjee, R. Narayan, C. F. Gammie, Y . Mizuno, P. Anninos, J. G. Baker, M. Bugli, C.-k. Chan, and J. Davelaar, et al., The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydro- dynamic Code Comparison Project, Astrophys. J. Supp.243, 26 (2019), arXiv:1904.04923 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  54. [54]

    EHT Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. VI. The Shadow and Mass of the Central Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L6 (2019), arXiv:1906.11243 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Model comparisons and theoretical in- terpretations, Astron

    EHT Collaboration, The persistent shadow of the supermassive black hole of M87: II. Model comparisons and theoretical in- terpretations, Astron. Astrophys.693, A265 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Mo ´scibrodzka and C

    M. Mo ´scibrodzka and C. F. Gammie, IPOLE - semi-analytic scheme for relativistic polarized radiative transport, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.475, 43 (2018), arXiv:1712.03057 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  57. [57]

    Mo ´scibrodzka, H

    M. Mo ´scibrodzka, H. Falcke, and H. Shiokawa, General rela- tivistic magnetohydrodynamical simulations of the jet in M 87, Astron. Astrophys.586, A38 (2016), arXiv:1510.07243 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2016

  58. [58]

    Wielgus, K

    M. Wielgus, K. Akiyama, L. Blackburn, C.-k. Chan, and D. et al., Monitoring the Morphology of M87* in 2009-2017 with the Event Horizon Telescope, Astrophys. J.901, 67 (2020), arXiv:2009.11842 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2009

  59. [59]

    EHT Collaboration, First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Re- sults. III. Data Processing and Calibration, Astrophys. J. Lett. 875, L3 (2019), arXiv:1906.11240 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Astrophys

    EHT Collaboration, Horizon-scale variability of M87* from 2017–2021 EHT observations, Astron. Astrophys.704, A91 (2025), arXiv:2509.24593 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2017

  61. [61]

    Teo, Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole, General Relativity and Gravitation35, 1909 (2003)

    E. Teo, Spherical Photon Orbits Around a Kerr Black Hole, General Relativity and Gravitation35, 1909 (2003)

    1909

  62. [62]

    J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric., inBlack Holes (Les Astres Occlus), edited by C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt (1973) pp. 215–239

    1973

  63. [63]

    Fundamental physics opportunities with future ground-based mm/sub-mm VLBI arrays,

    D. Ayzenberg, L. Blackburn, R. Brito, S. Britzen, and B. et al., Fundamental physics opportunities with the next-generation Event Horizon Telescope, Living Reviews in Relativity28, 4 (2025), arXiv:2312.02130 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  64. [64]

    Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon,

    A. Chael, M. D. Johnson, and A. Lupsasca, Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon, Astrophys. J.918, 6 (2021), arXiv:2106.00683 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2021

  65. [66]

    Carter Edwards, C

    H. Carter Edwards, C. R. Trott, and D. Sunderland, Kokkos: Enabling manycore performance portability through polymor- phic memory access patterns, Journal of Parallel and Dis- tributed Computing74, 3202 (2014), domain-Specific Lan- guages and High-Level Frameworks for High-Performance Computing

    2014

  66. [67]

    Trott, L

    C. Trott, L. Berger-Vergiat, D. Poliakoff, S. Rajamanickam, D. Lebrun-Grandie, J. Madsen, N. Al Awar, M. Gligoric, G. Shipman, and G. Womeldorff, The Kokkos EcoSystem: Comprehensive Performance Portability for High Performance Computing, Computing in Science and Engineering23, 10 (2021)

    2021

  67. [68]

    Kocherlakota, R

    P. Kocherlakota, R. Narayan, K. Chatterjee, A. Cruz-Osorio, and Y . Mizuno, Toward General Relativistic Magnetohydrody- namics Simulations in Stationary Nonvacuum Spacetimes, As- trophys. J. Lett.956, L11 (2023), arXiv:2307.15140 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  68. [69]

    L. G. Fishbone and V . Moncrief, Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes., Astrophys. J.207, 962 (1976)

    1976

  69. [70]

    G. N. Wong, B. S. Prather, V . Dhruv, B. R. Ryan, M. Mo ´sci- brodzka, C.-k. Chan, A. V . Joshi, R. Yarza, A. Ricarte, H. Sh- iokawa, J. C. Dolence, S. C. Noble, J. C. McKinney, and C. F. Gammie, PATOKA: Simulating Electromagnetic Observables of Black Hole Accretion, Astrophys. J. Supp.259, 64 (2022), arXiv:2202.11721 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2022

  70. [71]

    B. S. Prather, J. Dexter, M. Moscibrodzka, H.-Y . Pu, T. Bronzwaer, J. Davelaar, Z. Younsi, C. F. Gammie, R. Gold, and G. N. Wong, et al., Comparison of Polarized Radiative Transfer Codes Used by the EHT Collaboration, Astrophys. J. 950, 35 (2023), arXiv:2303.12004 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  71. [72]

    S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz, and R. M. Wald, Black hole shad- ows, photon rings, and lensing rings, Phys. Rev. D100, 024018 (2019), arXiv:1906.00873 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019