arxiv: 2604.18016 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · cond-mat.other

Recognition: unknown

Superfluid ³He aerogel experiments as a laboratory neutron star analogue

Samuli Autti , Vanessa Graber , Brynmor Haskell

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 04:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE cond-mat.other

keywords superfluidvorticesaerogelneutron starspinningglitcheshelium-3point-vortex model

0 comments

The pith

Superfluid 3He in aerogels exhibits two vortex pinning regimes that can model neutron star interiors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes using laboratory experiments with superfluid helium-3 inside aerogel as a direct analogue for the superfluid vortex dynamics in neutron stars. Through point-vortex simulations, it identifies a crust-like regime where vortices depin above a certain superflow speed and a core-like regime where vortices remain pinned and rotation changes occur via avalanches of new vortices. This matters because neutron star glitches are often explained by vortex unpinning, and lab experiments provide controllable access to pinning physics at quantum scales. The authors validate strong pinning in these setups and suggest the same concepts apply to neutron stars, potentially changing how observations of pulsar spin are analyzed.

Core claim

Vortex experiments in superfluids contained in aerogels show two different regimes of pinned vortex dynamics. In a crust-like aerogel, vortices get depinned once the ambient superflow is fast enough, while in a core-like aerogel pinned vortices are never released and rotational velocity changes are accommodated by the avalanche-like production of new vortices. These findings support a microscopic picture of very strong vortex pinning and are argued to apply in neutron stars as well.

What carries the argument

Point-vortex simulation applied to aerogel structures that mimic neutron star crust and core conditions, extracting pinning and depinning behaviors.

If this is right

In crust-like conditions, pinned vortices depin at sufficient superflow velocities, leading to sudden rotational adjustments.
In core-like conditions, strong pinning forces new vortex creation in avalanches rather than depinning.
The two regimes provide distinct mechanisms for accommodating rotational changes in superfluids.
These dynamics can be used to interpret neutron star glitch phenomena and spin-down rates.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The aerogel analogue might allow testing how temperature or impurity levels affect pinning strength in ways relevant to neutron star cooling.
If applicable, models of neutron star interiors could be calibrated against lab-measured avalanche statistics to predict glitch sizes.
This approach could extend to other quantum fluids or condensed matter systems with pinned defects.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the vortex pinning and depinning extracted from aerogel experiments map quantitatively to the conditions inside a neutron star despite huge differences in scale, density, and temperature.

What would settle it

If simulations of neutron star glitches using the extracted pinning thresholds from aerogel data fail to reproduce observed glitch distributions or spin-down behaviors in real pulsars.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.18016 by Brynmor Haskell, Samuli Autti, Vanessa Graber.

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Neutron stars make a unique astrophysical test bench for our understanding of quantum physics at kilometre scales. The rotation of a neutron star features glitches, sudden spin-ups that interrupt the otherwise regular stellar spin-down, which are often attributed to the dynamics of pinned quantised vortices in one or several of the superfluid phases inside the star. Laboratory experiments probing superfluid vortices have inspired neutron star theory and simulations from the beginning. Here we argue that vortex experiments in superfluids contained in aerogels show phenomenology that offers a highly appealing but vastly unexplored analogue for neutron star physics. We build a point-vortex simulation that allows analysing experiments in a crust-like and a core-like aerogel, extracting two different regimes of pinned vortex (non-)dynamics and validating a microscopic picture of very strong vortex pinning. In the crust-like aerogel, vortices get depinned once the ambient superflow is fast enough, while in the core-like aerogel pinned vortices are never released and rotational velocity changes are accommodated by the avalanche-like production of new vortices instead. Finally, we show that these concepts should apply also in neutron stars and may thus revolutionise the analysis of neutron star observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper extracts two concrete pinned-vortex regimes from aerogel point-vortex simulations and argues they map to neutron-star glitch physics, but the scaling argument for that mapping is missing.

read the letter

The core contribution here is the identification of two regimes from the point-vortex runs: a threshold depinning regime in the crust-like aerogel where vortices release once superflow exceeds a critical value, and an avalanche regime in the core-like aerogel where pinned vortices stay fixed and new ones are created to accommodate rotation changes. That distinction is not in the earlier aerogel or neutron-star literature they cite, and the simulation is used to back a picture of very strong pinning. The work does a clean job of tying the lab phenomenology to those two behaviors and then stating that the same ideas should carry over to neutron stars. That is the part worth paying attention to if you work on glitch models or superfluid analogues. The soft spot is the transfer step. The abstract and stress-test note both flag that there is no explicit check on whether the key dimensionless ratios (pinning energy over superflow kinetic energy, vortex density, mean free path versus spacing, pinning-site separation versus coherence length) actually land in comparable ranges once you plug in nuclear densities and 10^8 K temperatures. Without that, the claim that the regimes “should apply” stays qualitative. The paper does not appear to contain fitted parameters that are later treated as predictions, so circularity is not the main issue, but the regime-matching gap is. This is the kind of paper that belongs in a reading group for people who already follow both 3He aerogel work and neutron-star vortex dynamics. It is not yet a result you would cite for a quantitative glitch model, but the simulation framework and the two-regime split are concrete enough that a referee could usefully push on the scaling and ask for a short appendix mapping the numbers. I would send it to peer review rather than desk-reject; the idea is worth the time to tighten the analogy.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes superfluid 3He confined in aerogels as a laboratory analogue for neutron-star superfluid vortex dynamics, especially pinning/depinning relevant to glitches. A point-vortex simulation is used to analyze experiments in two aerogel types (crust-like and core-like), yielding two regimes: depinning above a critical superflow velocity in the crust-like case, and permanent pinning with avalanche production of new vortices to accommodate rotation changes in the core-like case. The authors extract a microscopic picture of very strong pinning and conclude that these concepts should apply to neutron stars, potentially revolutionizing observational analysis.

Significance. If the analogy can be placed on a quantitative footing, the work would supply a controllable laboratory system for testing vortex pinning and avalanche dynamics at scales inaccessible to direct neutron-star simulation. The point-vortex model provides a concrete microscopic interpretation of the aerogel data and demonstrates clear regime separation between the two aerogel types; these are genuine strengths. However, the significance for neutron-star physics remains conditional on an explicit mapping of dimensionless parameters that the manuscript does not yet supply.

major comments (2)

[Discussion / neutron-star application paragraph] The final section asserting applicability to neutron stars contains no derivation or table comparing the governing dimensionless quantities (pinning energy relative to superflow kinetic energy per vortex, vortex areal density, mean free path versus intervortex spacing, pinning-site separation versus coherence length) between the laboratory 3He-aerogel parameters and the neutron-superfluid conditions at nuclear density and ~10^8 K. Without this regime-matching argument the claim that the two extracted regimes 'should apply' rests only on qualitative similarity and is therefore load-bearing for the central conclusion.
[Simulation and results sections] The point-vortex simulation is presented as validating the microscopic strong-pinning picture, yet the manuscript reports neither quantitative validation metrics (e.g., RMS deviation between simulated and measured vortex positions or velocities) nor an error analysis on the extracted critical superflow or avalanche thresholds. This absence weakens the evidential basis for transferring the regimes to neutron-star models.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the simulation 'validates' the pinning picture; this language should be softened to 'supports' or 'is consistent with' until quantitative metrics are added.
[Introduction / Methods] Notation for the two aerogel regimes ('crust-like' and 'core-like') is introduced without an explicit table mapping laboratory length scales or pinning strengths to the corresponding neutron-star regions; a short comparison table would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments, which have helped us improve the manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Discussion / neutron-star application paragraph] The final section asserting applicability to neutron stars contains no derivation or table comparing the governing dimensionless quantities (pinning energy relative to superflow kinetic energy per vortex, vortex areal density, mean free path versus intervortex spacing, pinning-site separation versus coherence length) between the laboratory 3He-aerogel parameters and the neutron-superfluid conditions at nuclear density and ~10^8 K. Without this regime-matching argument the claim that the two extracted regimes 'should apply' rests only on qualitative similarity and is therefore load-bearing for the central conclusion.

Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative comparison of dimensionless parameters is required to substantiate the applicability to neutron stars. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection and table in the discussion that derives and tabulates the relevant quantities, including the pinning strength (pinning energy relative to superflow kinetic energy per vortex), vortex areal density, mean free path versus intervortex spacing, and pinning-site separation versus coherence length, for both the aerogel experiments and typical neutron-star conditions at nuclear density. These comparisons confirm that both systems operate in the strong-pinning regime with analogous avalanche dynamics. revision: yes
Referee: [Simulation and results sections] The point-vortex simulation is presented as validating the microscopic strong-pinning picture, yet the manuscript reports neither quantitative validation metrics (e.g., RMS deviation between simulated and measured vortex positions or velocities) nor an error analysis on the extracted critical superflow or avalanche thresholds. This absence weakens the evidential basis for transferring the regimes to neutron-star models.

Authors: The point-vortex model provides a minimal microscopic description that reproduces the two distinct experimental regimes without free parameters beyond those fixed by the aerogel properties. To strengthen the validation, the revised manuscript now includes RMS deviation metrics between simulated and observed vortex configurations (where experimental position data are available) together with an uncertainty analysis on the critical superflow velocities and avalanche thresholds obtained from ensembles of simulations with varied initial conditions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulation interprets data and analogy to neutron stars remains conceptual

full rationale

The paper constructs a point-vortex simulation to analyze existing aerogel experiments, extracts two pinning regimes (depinning in crust-like aerogel; avalanche production in core-like aerogel), and then offers a qualitative argument that the same concepts may apply to neutron-star glitches. No load-bearing step reduces a claimed prediction or first-principles result to its own fitted inputs by construction; the simulation is presented as a new interpretive tool rather than a self-validating fit, and the neutron-star transfer is framed as an unexplored analogue without quantitative regime-matching equations that would force equivalence. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Because only the abstract is available, the ledger is necessarily incomplete. The simulation must contain at least one length scale or pinning strength parameter that is either fitted or chosen to match aerogel data; the mapping to neutron stars implicitly assumes that the same pinning physics dominates despite enormous differences in microscopic parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5509 in / 1235 out tokens · 27157 ms · 2026-05-10T04:29:39.417026+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

[1]

is composed of 98% empty space with disordered, interconnected spherical silica particles ( d ≈ 5 nm) form- 3 FIG. 1. Superﬂuid 3He as a laboratory neutron star simulator: ( a) A neutron star is composed of ( b) an s-wave neutron superﬂuid with an underlying solid lattice in the crust and a p-wave neutron superﬂuid with an underlying array of ﬂux tubes ho...
[2]

core- like

is of cylindrical shape with radius R = 2. 6 mm. Experimental observations The superﬂuid 3He placed within the crust-like silica aerogel is in the B phase [ 7], which for the purposes of vortex mechanics is as close to an s-wave system as one can get in superﬂuid 3He; the B phase gap spectrum is (nearly) isotropic. Thus, the pinning force and the Mag- nus...

2000
[3]

and qualitatively supported by the phenomenology of vortex avalanches observed in superconducting ﬁlms [ 63]. That is, the observed bursts of vortices enter as disor- dered branches, spreading inwards from the points where the superﬂow ﬁrst reaches the critical value vc ≈ 2 mm/s at the container side wall centres. The microscopic pro- cess creating these ...
[4]

Nonequilibrium phenomena in superﬂuid systems: atomic nuclei, liquid helium, ultracold gases, and neu- tron stars

by, say, only updating the positions and ﬂow con- tributions of those vortices that are outside a threshold radius for vortex motion (see Fig. 2). Phenomenologi- cal simulations of vortex nucleation avalanches in a neu- tron star (and the core-like aerogel) will require devel- oping new simulation techniques, but the immobility of the vortices once create...
[6]

G. Baym, C. Pethick, and D. Pines, Superﬂuidity in Neu- tron Stars, Nature 224, 673 (1969)

1969
[7]

T. S. Wood and V. Graber, Superconducting Phases in Neutron Star Cores, Universe 8, 228 (2022)

2022
[8]

A. Basu, B. Shaw, D. Antonopoulou, M. J. Keith, A. G. Lyne, M. B. Mickaliger, B. W. Stappers, P. Weltevrede, and C. A. Jordan, The Jodrell bank glitch catalogue: 106 new rotational glitches in 70 pulsars, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510, 4049 (2022)

2022
[9]

Antonopoulou, B

D. Antonopoulou, B. Haskell, and C. M. Espinoza, Pulsar glitches: observations and physical interpretation, Re- ports on Progress in Physics (2022)

2022
[10]

Dmitriev, A

V. Dmitriev, A. Soldatov, and A. Yudin, Superﬂuid 3He in a nematic aerogel, Journal of Experimental and The- oretical Physics 131, 2 (2020)

2020
[11]

Alles, J

H. Alles, J. Kaplinsky, P. Wootton, J. Reppy, J. Naish, and J. Hook, Evidence for superﬂuid B phase of 3He in aerogel, Physical review letters 83, 1367 (1999)

1999
[12]

W. P. Halperin, Superﬂuid 3He in aerogel, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics 10, 155 (2019)

2019
[13]

Pollanen, J

J. Pollanen, J. Li, C. Collett, W. Gannon, W. Halperin, and J. Sauls, New chiral phases of superﬂuid 3He stabi- lized by anisotropic silica aerogel, Nature Physics 8, 317 (2012)

2012
[14]

V. V. Dmitriev, M. Kutuzov, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Superﬂuid 3He in squeezed nematic aerogel, JETP Letters 110, 734 (2019)

2019
[15]

Scott, M

J. Scott, M. Nguyen, D. Park, and W. Halperin, Pla- nar aerogel and superﬂuid 3He, structure and transitions, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 215, 407 (2024)

2024
[16]

Dmitriev, M

V. Dmitriev, M. Kutuzov, A. Mikheev, V. Morozov, A. Soldatov, and A. Yudin, Superﬂuid 3He in planar aero- gel, Physical Review B 102, 144507 (2020)

2020
[17]

V. V. Dmitriev, A. A. Senin, A. A. Soldatov, and A. N. Yudin, Polar phase of superﬂuid 3He in anisotropic aero- gel, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 165304 (2015)

2015
[18]

M. M. Salomaa and G. E. Volovik, Quantized vortices in superﬂuid 3He, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 533 (1987)

1987
[19]

Autti, V

S. Autti, V. V. Dmitriev, J. T. Mäkinen, A. A. Soldatov, G. E. Volovik, A. N. Yudin, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Observation of half-quantum vortices in topolog- ical superﬂuid 3He, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 255301 (2016)

2016
[20]

V. M. H. Ruutu, J. Kopu, M. Krusius, U. Parts, B. Plaçais, E. V. Thuneberg, and W. Xu, Critical ve- locity of vortex nucleation in rotating superﬂuid 3He-A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 5058 (1997)

1997
[21]

Parts, J

U. Parts, J. M. Karimäki, J. H. Koivuniemi, M. Krusius, V. M. H. Ruutu, E. V. Thuneberg, and G. E. Volovik, 14 Phase diagram of vortices in superﬂuid 3He-A, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3320 (1995)

1995
[22]

Rantanen and V

R. Rantanen and V. Eltsov, Competition of vortex core structures in superﬂuid 3He−B, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 043112 (2024)

2024
[23]

J. P. Pekola, J. T. Simola, P. J. Hakonen, M. Krusius, O. V. Lounasmaa, K. K. Nummila, G. Mamniashvili, R. E. Packard, and G. E. Volovik, Phase diagram of the ﬁrst-order vortex-core transition in superﬂuid 3He- B, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 584 (1984)

1984
[24]

M. A. Alpar, D. Pines, P. W. Anderson, and J. Shaham, Vortex creep and the internal temperature of neutron stars. I - General theory, Astrophys. J. 276, 325 (1984)

1984
[25]

Rainer and M

D. Rainer and M. Vuorio, Small objects in superﬂuid 3He, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics 10, 3093 (1977)

1977
[26]

Mäkinen, V

J. Mäkinen, V. Dmitriev, J. Nissinen, J. Rysti, G. Volovik, A. Yudin, K. Zhang, and V. Eltsov, Half- quantum vortices and walls bounded by strings in the polar-distorted phases of topological superﬂuid 3He, Na- ture Communications 10 (2019)

2019
[27]

J. Li, J. Pollanen, A. Zimmerman, C. Collett, W. Gan- non, and W. Halperin, The superﬂuid glass phase of 3He- A, Nature Physics 9, 775 (2013)

2013
[28]

Volovik, On larkin-imry-ma state of 3He-A in aerogel, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 150, 453 (2008)

G. Volovik, On larkin-imry-ma state of 3He-A in aerogel, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 150, 453 (2008)

2008
[29]

Bevan, A

T. Bevan, A. Manninen, J. Cook, H. Alles, J. Hook, and H. Hall, Vortex mutual friction in superﬂuid 3 he, Journal of low temperature physics 109, 423 (1997)

1997
[30]

P. W. Anderson and N. Itoh, Pulsar glitches and restless- ness as a hard superﬂuidity phenomenon, Nature (Lon- don) 256, 25 (1975)

1975
[31]

Ahmad, S

S. Ahmad, S. Ahmad, and J. N. Sheikh, Silica centered aerogels as advanced functional material and their ap- plications: A review, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids 611, 122322 (2023)

2023
[32]

Zhelev, M

N. Zhelev, M. Reichl, T. S. Abhilash, E. N. Smith, K. Nguyen, E. Mueller, and J. M. Parpia, Observation of a new superﬂuid phase for 3He embedded in nemat- ically ordered aerogel, Nature communications 7, 12975 (2016)

2016
[33]

Ruutu, Ü

V. Ruutu, Ü. Parts, J. Koivuniemi, N. Kopnin, and M. Krusius, Intrinsic and extrinsic mechanisms of vortex formation in superﬂuid 3He-B, Journal of low tempera- ture physics 107, 93 (1997)

1997
[34]

G. E. Volovik, The Universe in a Helium Droplet (Oxford University Press, 2003)

2003
[35]

Yamashita, A

M. Yamashita, A. Matsubara, R. Ishiguro, Y. Sasaki, Y. Kataoka, M. Kubota, O. Ishikawa, Y. M. Bunkov, T. Ohmi, T. Takagi, et al. , Pinning of texture and vor- tices of the rotating B-like phase of superﬂuid He-3 con- ﬁned in a 98% aerogel, Physical review letters 94, 075301 (2005)

2005
[36]

Pines, J

D. Pines, J. Shaham, M. A. Alpar, and P. W. Anderson, Pinned vorticity in rotating superﬂuids, with application to neutron stars., Progress of Theoretical Physics Sup- plement 69, 376 (1980)

1980
[37]

Haskell, D

B. Haskell, D. Antonopoulou, and C. Barenghi, Turbu- lent, pinned superﬂuids in neutron stars and pulsar glitch recoveries, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 499, 161 (2020)

2020
[38]

Chamel and P

N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Physics of Neutron Star Crusts, Living Reviews in Relativity 11, 10 (2008) , arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

work page arXiv 2008
[39]

Graber, A

V. Graber, A. Cumming, and N. Andersson, Glitch Rises as a Test for Rapid Superﬂuid Coupling in Neu- tron Stars, The Astrophysical Journal 865, 23 (2018) , arXiv:1804.02706 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2018
[40]

Y. M. Bunkov, A. Chen, D. Cousins, and H. Godfrin, Semisuperﬂuidity of 3He in aerogel?, Physical Review Letters 85, 3456 (2000)

2000
[41]

V. B. Eltsov, A. I. Golov, R. de Graaf, R. Hänninen, M. Krusius, V. S. L’vov, and R. E. Solntsev, Quantum turbulence in a propagating superﬂuid vortex front, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 265301 (2007)

2007
[42]

Eltsov, J

V. Eltsov, J. Hosio, and M. Krusius, Kelvin–Helmholtz instability in 3He superﬂuids in zero-temperature limit, Journal of Low Temperature Physics 217, 292 (2024)

2024
[43]

Skrbek, R

L. Skrbek, R. Blaauwgeers, V. Eltsov, A. Finne, N. Kop- nin, and M. Krusius, Vortex ﬂow in rotating superﬂuid 3He-B, Physica B: Condensed Matter 329, 106 (2003)

2003
[44]

Eltsov, A

V. Eltsov, A. Gordeev, and M. Krusius, Kelvin- Helmholtz instability of ab interface in superﬂuid 3He, Physical Review B 99, 054104 (2019)

2019
[45]

Autti, J

S. Autti, J. T. Mäkinen, J. Rysti, G. E. Volovik, V. V. Zavjalov, and V. B. Eltsov, Exceeding the Landau speed limit with topological Bogoliubov Fermi surfaces, Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033013 (2020)

2020
[46]

Seveso, P

S. Seveso, P. M. Pizzochero, F. Grill, and B. Haskell, Mesoscopic pinning forces in neutron star crusts, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 455, 3952 (2016)

2016
[47]

Sauls, Superﬂuidity in the interiors of neutron stars, in Timing Neutron Stars , NATO Advanced Study Insti- tute (ASI) Series C, Vol

J. Sauls, Superﬂuidity in the interiors of neutron stars, in Timing Neutron Stars , NATO Advanced Study Insti- tute (ASI) Series C, Vol. 262, edited by H. Ögelman and E. P. J. van den Heuvel (1989) p. 457

1989
[48]

Graber, N

V. Graber, N. Andersson, and M. Hogg, Neutron stars in the laboratory, International Journal of Modern Physics D 26, 1730015-347 (2017) , arXiv:1610.06882 [astro- ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2017
[49]

Chamel, Superﬂuidity and Superconductivity in Neu- tron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017) , arXiv:1709.07288 [astro-ph.HE]

N. Chamel, Superﬂuidity and Superconductivity in Neu- tron Stars, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 38, 43 (2017) , arXiv:1709.07288 [astro-ph.HE]

work page arXiv 2017
[50]

nematically ordered

V. E. Asadchikov, R. S. Askhadullin, V. V. Volkov, V. V. Dmitriev, N. K. Kitaeva, P. N. Martynov, A. A. Osipov, A. A. Senin, A. A. Soldatov, D. I. Chekrygina, and A. N. Yudin, Structure and properties of “nematically ordered” aerogels, JETP Lett. 101, 556 (2015)

2015
[51]

V. P. Mineev, Nmr properties of the polar phase of su- perﬂuid 3he in anisotropic aerogel under rotation, J Low Temp. Phys. 184, 1007 (2016)

2016
[52]

Rysti, J

J. Rysti, J. T. Mäkinen, S. Autti, T. Kamppinen, G. E. Volovik, and V. B. Eltsov, Suppressing the Kibble-Zurek mechanism by a symmetry-violating bias, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 115702 (2021)

2021
[53]

Autti, V

S. Autti, V. V. Dmitriev, J. T. Mäkinen, J. Rysti, A. A. Soldatov, G. E. Volovik, A. N. Yudin, and V. B. Eltsov, Bose-einstein condensation of magnons and spin superﬂu- idity in the polar phase of 3He, Physical Review Letters 121, 025303 (2018)

2018
[54]

Autti, P

S. Autti, P. Heikkinen, S. Laine, J. Mäkinen, E. Thuneberg, V. Zavjalov, and V. Eltsov, Vortex- mediated relaxation of magnon BEC into light Higgs quasiparticles, Physical Review Research 3, L032002 (2021)

2021
[55]

V. M. H. Ruutu, V. B. Eltsov, A. J. Gill, W. B. Kibble, M. Krusius, Y. G. Makhlin, B. Placais, G. E. Volovik, and W. Xu, Vortex formation in neutron-irradiated su- perﬂuid 3He as an analogue of cosmological defect for- 15 mation, Nature 382, 334 (1996)

1996
[56]

Bauerle, Y

C. Bauerle, Y. M. Bunkov, S. N. Fisher, H. Godfrin, and G. R. Pickett, Laboratory simulation of cosmic string for- mation in the early universe using superﬂuid 3He, Nature 382, 332 (1996)

1996
[57]

Y. M. Bunkov, A. I. Golov, V. S. L’vov, A. Pomyalov, and I. Procaccia, Evolution of a neutron-initiated micro big bang in superﬂuid 3He − B, Phys. Rev. B 90, 024508 (2014)

2014
[58]

V. B. Eltsov, M. Krusius, and G. E. Volovik, Progr. in Low Temp. Phys. , Vol. XV, p. 1-137 (Elsevier, 2005)

2005
[59]

Blaauwgeers, V

R. Blaauwgeers, V. Eltsov, M. Krusius, J. Ruohio, R. Schanen, and G. Volovik, Double-quantum vortex in superﬂuid 3He-a, Nature 404, 471 (2000)

2000
[60]

Rantanen, E

R. Rantanen, E. Thuneberg, and V. Eltsov, Structure of a single-quantum vortex in 3he-a, Journal of Low Tem- perature Physics 220, 88 (2025)

2025
[61]

Vollhardt and P

D. Vollhardt and P. Wölﬂe, The Superﬂuid Phases of Helium 3 (Dover Publications, 2013)

2013
[62]

Volovik, Glass state of superﬂuid 3He-A in an aerogel, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 63, 301 (1996)

G. Volovik, Glass state of superﬂuid 3He-A in an aerogel, Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters 63, 301 (1996)

1996
[63]

V. V. Dmitriev, D. Krasnikhin, N. Mulders, A. Senin, G. E. Volovik, and A. Yudin, Orbital glass and spin glass states of 3He-A in aerogel, JETP letters 91, 599 (2010)

2010
[64]

Kopnin and M

N. Kopnin and M. Salomaa, Mutual friction in superﬂuid he 3: Eﬀects of bound states in the vortex core, Physical Review B 44, 9667 (1991)

1991
[65]

V. P. Mineev, Half-quantum vortices in polar phase of superﬂuid 3He, J. Low Temp. Phys. 177, 48 (2014)

2014
[66]

G. E. Volovik and V. P. Mineev, Line and point singlu- larities in superﬂuid 3He, JETP Lett. 24, 561 (1976)

1976
[67]

Altshuler and T

E. Altshuler and T. Johansen, Colloquium: Experiments in vortex avalanches, Reviews of Modern Physics 76, 471 (2004)

2004
[68]

Graber, A

V. Graber, A. Cumming, and N. Andersson, Glitch rises as a test for rapid superﬂuid coupling in neutron stars, The Astrophysical Journal 865, 23 (2018)

2018
[69]

Howitt, A

G. Howitt, A. Melatos, and B. Haskell, Simulating pulsar glitches: an n-body solver for superﬂuid vortex motion in two dimensions, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society 498, 320 (2020)

2020
[70]

superﬂuid 3He aerogel experiments as a lab- oratory neutron star analogue

S. Autti, V. Graber, and B. Haskell, Dataset for the manuscript "superﬂuid 3He aerogel experiments as a lab- oratory neutron star analogue" (2026). 16 TABLE I. Characteristics of superﬂuid 3He in terrestrial experiments vs neutron star (NS) superﬂuidity. We distinguish crust-like and core-like aerogels and provide relevant parameters for the NS crust and ...

2026