pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20235 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-ph · hep-th· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

No planar degeneracy for the Landau gauge quark-gluon vertex

Georg Wieland, Reinhard Alkofer

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 00:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph hep-thnucl-th
keywords quark-gluon vertexDyson-Schwinger equationsLandau gaugechiral symmetry breakingquenched QCDtransverse form factorsplanar degeneracytensor coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

The transverse quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge shows weak but non-negligible angular dependence, ruling out planar degeneracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper solves the Dyson-Schwinger equations for the transverse structures of the quark-gluon vertex in quenched Landau-gauge QCD using a 3PI truncation. It finds that the angular dependence of the form factors is mild, yet argues that this does not permit assuming planar degeneracy because the variation affects precision in derived quantities. The work also identifies the dynamically generated tensor coupling of glue to quarks as the essential ingredient for dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, which in turn enables that coupling. Additional results include a relation among chirality-violating form factors, independence of the quark propagator from the choice of Yang-Mills solution, and consistency with real-axis poles only.

Core claim

Based on a suitable basis for the transverse tensor structures and chosen kinematical variables, the transverse part of the quark-gluon vertex is obtained from the Dyson-Schwinger equations. Analysis shows seemingly weak angular dependence of the form factors, but this mild dependence cannot be neglected for reasonably precise results on derived quantities, so there is no planar degeneracy. In the self-consistent 3PI system, the core to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking is the tensor coupling of glue to quarks made possible by the breaking itself.

What carries the argument

The self-consistent system of 3PI Dyson-Schwinger equations for the quark propagator and the quark-gluon vertex, solved with a basis of transverse tensor structures.

If this is right

  • The quark propagator obtained is identical within errors for both decoupling and scaling solutions of the Yang-Mills sector.
  • A specific relation holds between the calculated chirality-violating vertex form factors.
  • The resulting quark propagator is consistent with poles only on the real time-like half-axis.
  • High-precision fits to the form factors are available using simple model functions.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the angular dependence is retained, calculations of meson properties or other observables may show improved accuracy compared to degenerate approximations.
  • The finding that tensor coupling drives chiral symmetry breaking suggests testing this mechanism in other functional approaches or models of QCD.
  • High-precision fits could simplify future computations while preserving accuracy in vertex-dependent quantities.

Load-bearing premise

The truncation of the Dyson-Schwinger hierarchy to a self-consistent 3PI system involving only the quark propagator and quark-gluon vertex, in the quenched approximation, suffices to capture the essential physics of the transverse vertex structures and chiral symmetry breaking.

What would settle it

A lattice QCD computation of the full angular dependence of the quark-gluon vertex form factors in the Landau gauge that shows either significantly stronger angular variation or confirms the mild dependence to high precision would test the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20235 by Georg Wieland, Reinhard Alkofer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. DSE for the quark propagator including one bare [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Diagrammatic representation of the equation for the quark-gluon vertex including the non-Abelian and the Abelian [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Pictorial representation of the quark-gluon vertex. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Displayed are the quark propagator functions based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Displayed are the QGV functions (units are GeV) at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Displayed are the contributions of the QGV functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Displayed are the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Displayed are the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Displayed are the quark propagator functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Displayed are the ratios of (i) the IR value of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Displayed are the differences of quark mass functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Displayed are the contributions from the differ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Displayed are the ratios to the respective full three [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. The product of the gluon propagator with QGV’s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: FIG. 19. Displayed are the ratios of quark mass functions as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: FIG. 20. Shown are the chiral-limit quark mass functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: FIG. 22. Shown are the contributions to the infrared value [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_22.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Based on a suitable basis system for the quark-gluon vertex' transverse tensor structures and on carefully chosen kinematical variables, the transverse part of the quark-gluon vertex in quenched QCD in the Landau gauge is obtained from a system of Dyson-Schwinger equations. We demonstrate by analysing this solution that the angular dependence of these transverse quark-gluon vertex form factors is seemingly weak. We nevertheless argue that this does not imply a planar degeneracy for this vertex because even this mild dependence cannot be neglected when aiming for reasonably precise results for derived quantities. Last but not least, for a self-consistently coupled systems of 3PI Dyson-Schwinger equations for the quark propagator and the quark-gluon vertex we confirm that the core ingredient to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking is the dynamically generated tensor coupling of glue to quarks which itself is only possible because of chiral symmetry breaking. Furthermore, we find (i) a relation in between the calculated chirality violating vertex form factors; (ii) that the quark propagator is identical within numerical errors when obtained either from a decoupling solution or the scaling solution for the Yang-Mills propagators and vertex functions; and (iii) that the resulting quark propagator is consistent with possessing poles only on the real time-like half-axis. Furthermore, we provide high-precision fits for the form factors based on sometimes astonishingly simple model functions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper solves the truncated 3PI Dyson-Schwinger equations for the quark propagator and the transverse tensor structures of the Landau-gauge quark-gluon vertex in quenched QCD. It reports that the angular dependence of the transverse form factors is weak, yet argues that this does not justify a planar-degeneracy approximation because the dependence affects precision in derived quantities. Additional results include a relation among chirality-violating form factors, equivalence of the quark propagator obtained from decoupling versus scaling Yang-Mills solutions, consistency with real time-like poles only, confirmation that the tensor coupling is central to dynamical chiral symmetry breaking, and high-precision model fits to the form factors.

Significance. If the numerical findings are robust, the work clarifies the structure of the quark-gluon vertex relevant to non-perturbative QCD, hadron phenomenology, and studies of dynamical chiral symmetry breaking. The high-precision fits constitute a concrete, reusable output that can be adopted in model calculations. The equivalence between decoupling and scaling solutions for the quark propagator is a useful consistency check within the truncation.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / numerical results section] Abstract and the section presenting the numerical analysis of the transverse form factors: the central claim that the observed mild angular dependence 'cannot be neglected when aiming for reasonably precise results for derived quantities' is not supported by any explicit side-by-side computation. No comparison is shown between a derived quantity (e.g., the quark mass function, chiral condensate, or a meson observable) evaluated with the full angular-dependent vertex versus an angle-averaged or planar-degenerate approximation, leaving the non-degeneracy conclusion as an assertion rather than a quantified result.
minor comments (2)
  1. [section on model fits] The high-precision model fits are a positive contribution, but the text should state the fitting procedure, the number of data points used, and any goodness-of-fit measures (e.g., reduced chi-squared) to allow readers to assess their reliability.
  2. [basis and kinematics section] The kinematical variables chosen for the vertex are described as 'carefully chosen'; a brief explicit definition or reference to the precise momentum routing would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We appreciate the positive assessment of the work's significance for non-perturbative QCD and hadron phenomenology. We address the single major comment below in detail.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / numerical results section] Abstract and the section presenting the numerical analysis of the transverse form factors: the central claim that the observed mild angular dependence 'cannot be neglected when aiming for reasonably precise results for derived quantities' is not supported by any explicit side-by-side computation. No comparison is shown between a derived quantity (e.g., the quark mass function, chiral condensate, or a meson observable) evaluated with the full angular-dependent vertex versus an angle-averaged or planar-degenerate approximation, leaving the non-degeneracy conclusion as an assertion rather than a quantified result.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents the claim regarding the necessity of retaining the mild angular dependence primarily through analysis of the vertex form factors themselves, without an explicit quantitative comparison of a derived quantity (such as the quark mass function or chiral condensate) obtained from the full solution versus a planar-degenerate or angle-averaged approximation. This leaves the argument somewhat qualitative. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection in the numerical results section that performs and displays such a side-by-side comparison for at least one derived quantity, thereby converting the statement into a quantified result. We expect this addition to directly address the concern while preserving the overall conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results from explicit numerical solution of truncated DSE system

full rationale

The paper solves a self-consistent but explicitly truncated 3PI Dyson-Schwinger system for the quenched Landau-gauge quark propagator and quark-gluon vertex, extracts the transverse form factors, and reports their mild angular dependence together with several consistency relations. These outputs are generated by the integral equations under the stated truncation and quenched approximation; they do not reduce to the inputs by algebraic identity, redefinition, or load-bearing self-citation. The argument that the observed dependence precludes planar degeneracy rests on the numerical results themselves rather than on any fitted parameter being relabeled as a prediction or on an unverified uniqueness theorem imported from prior work by the same authors. The truncation is openly declared as an assumption, not smuggled in. No step satisfies the criteria for any of the enumerated circularity kinds.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed from abstract only; typical DSE elements are inferred from explicit mentions of quenched QCD, 3PI truncation, and numerical fitting.

free parameters (1)
  • parameters in high-precision model fits
    Simple model functions are fitted to the numerical form-factor data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quenched approximation (no dynamical quark loops)
    Explicitly stated in the abstract for the QCD calculation.
  • ad hoc to paper Truncation to 3PI Dyson-Schwinger system for quark propagator and quark-gluon vertex
    The self-consistent system is limited to these two objects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5540 in / 1490 out tokens · 45285 ms · 2026-05-10T00:35:13.398397+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quark-gluon vertex in the complex plane

    hep-ph 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 8.0

    The nonperturbative quark-gluon vertex is mapped for the first time in the complex plane, yielding all eight form factors inside a parabolic domain bounded by the first singularity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

114 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    fixed vertex

    (see also, e.g., [101]), f2 π =Z 2 N π2 Z dq2q2 M(q 2) M(q 2) + q2 2 dM(q 2) dq2 A(q2) (q2 +M(q 2))2 (26) are displayed, and in the lower panel the ones for the quark condensate. These plots lead to the conclusion that even restricting thew-dependence of an already fully iterated solution to only one value ofwis already suffi- cient for quite some sizeabl...

  2. [2]

    small-basis-effect

    For the parametersa 2 =M(0) andb 2 ≈2 GeV 2 one finds five roots, three real ones and one complex-conjugated pair. The appearance of a complex-conjugated pair of poles in the quark propagator might or might not be an artefact of the various employed approximations and truncations. The lowest-lying pole can now easily be approximated to occur at P 2 llp ≈ ...

    work page doi:10.55776/pat6443923

  3. [3]

    50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics,

    F. Gross, et al., 50 Years of Quantum Chromodynamics, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (2023) 1125.arXiv:2212.11107, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-11949-2 2023

  4. [4]

    Pagels, A Nonperturbative Approach to Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys

    H. Pagels, A Nonperturbative Approach to Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 15 (1977) 2991.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.15.2991

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.15.2991 1977

  5. [5]

    W. J. Marciano, H. Pagels, Quantum Chromodynamics: A Review, Phys. Rept. 36 (1978) 137.doi:10.1016/ 0370-1573(78)90208-9

    1978

  6. [6]

    Pagels, Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys

    H. Pagels, Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. D 19 (1979) 3080.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.19.3080

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.19.3080 1979

  7. [7]

    V. P. Gusynin, V. A. Miransky, On the Vacuum Rear- rangement in Massless Chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 76 (1978) 585–588.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78) 90860-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(78 1978

  8. [8]

    Eichmann, arXiv:2503.10397 [hep-ph] (2025)

    G. Eichmann, Hadron physics with functional meth- ods,arXiv:2503.10397

    work page arXiv

  9. [9]

    M. Q. Huber, A beginner’s guide to functional methods in particle physics,arXiv:2510.18960

    work page arXiv

  10. [10]

    Braun, A

    J. Braun, A. Geißel, J. M. Pawlowski, F. R. Sattler, N. Wink, Juggling with tensor bases in functional ap- proaches, Annals Phys. 484 (2026) 170250.arXiv: 2503.05580,doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170250

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2025.170250 2026

  11. [11]

    Eichmann, Getting a handle on correlation func- tions,arXiv:2603.00804

    G. Eichmann, Getting a handle on correlation func- tions,arXiv:2603.00804

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    J. I. Skullerud, A Study of the quark - gluon vertex, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 47 (1996) 398–401.arXiv:hep-lat/9509068,doi:10.1016/ 0920-5632(96)00082-5. 17 Note that with Abelian diagram added Σ (7) and Σ (8) are in- dividually sizeable but cancel each other pretty precisely thus matching the picture without Abelian diagram. We attribute this as a pecu...

    work page arXiv 1996

  13. [13]

    J. I. Skullerud, The Running coupling from the quark gluon vertex, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 63 (1998) 242–244.arXiv:hep-lat/9710044,doi:10. 1016/S0920-5632(97)00733-0

    work page arXiv 1998

  14. [14]

    Skullerud, A

    J. Skullerud, A. Kizilersu, A. G. Williams, Quark gluon vertex in a momentum subtraction scheme, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 106 (2002) 841–843.arXiv:hep-lat/ 0109027,doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(01)01861-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(01)01861-8 2002

  15. [15]

    Skullerud, P

    J. Skullerud, P. O. Bowman, A. Kizilersu, The Nonper- turbative quark gluon vertex, in: 5th International Con- ference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spec- trum, 2002, pp. 270–272.arXiv:hep-lat/0212011, doi:10.1142/9789812704269_0033

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812704269_0033 2002

  16. [16]

    J. I. Skullerud, A. Kizilersu, P. O. Bowman, D. B. Lein- weber, A. G. Williams, Looking inside the quark-gluon vertex, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 128 (2004) 117–124. doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(03)02467-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(03)02467-8 2004

  17. [17]

    Lin, Quark-gluon vertex with an off-shell O(a)- improved chiral fermion action, Phys

    H.-W. Lin, Quark-gluon vertex with an off-shell O(a)- improved chiral fermion action, Phys. Rev. D 73 (2006) 094511.arXiv:hep-lat/0510110,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.73.094511

    work page arXiv 2006

  18. [18]

    Kizilersu, D

    A. Kizilersu, D. B. Leinweber, J.-I. Skullerud, A. G. Williams, Quark-gluon vertex in general kinematics, Eur. Phys. J. C 50 (2007) 871–875.arXiv:hep-lat/ 0610078,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0250-6

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-007-0250-6 2007

  19. [19]

    Furui, A Study of quark-gluon vertices using the lat- tice Coulomb gauge domain wall fermion, PoS LAT- TICE2008 (2008) 130.arXiv:0808.1796,doi:10

    S. Furui, A Study of quark-gluon vertices using the lat- tice Coulomb gauge domain wall fermion, PoS LAT- TICE2008 (2008) 130.arXiv:0808.1796,doi:10. 22323/1.066.0130

    work page arXiv 2008

  20. [20]

    Oliveira, A

    O. Oliveira, A. Kızılersu, P. J. Silva, J.-I. Skullerud, A. Sternbeck, A. G. Williams, Lattice Landau gauge quark propagator and the quark-gluon vertex, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 9 (2016) 363–368.arXiv:1605. 09632,doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.9.363

    work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.9.363 2016

  21. [21]

    Sternbeck, P.-H

    A. Sternbeck, P.-H. Balduf, A. Kızılersu, O. Oliveira, P. J. Silva, J.-I. Skullerud, A. G. Williams, Triple-gluon and quark-gluon vertex from lattice QCD in Landau gauge, PoS LATTICE2016 (2017) 349.arXiv:1702. 00612,doi:10.22323/1.256.0349. 21 10−2 10−1 100 101 102 −3 −2 −1 0 1 2 3 p2 [GeV2] ΓχS(p2,3p2/4,0) Γ (1) Γ (2) [GeV−2] DC1 Γ (3) [GeV−2] Γ (4) [GeV...

    work page doi:10.22323/1.256.0349 2017

  22. [22]

    Kızılers¨ u, O

    A. Kızılers¨ u, O. Oliveira, P. J. Silva, J.-I. Skullerud, A. Sternbeck, Quark-gluon vertex from Nf=2 lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 103 (11) (2021) 114515.arXiv: 2103.02945,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114515

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.114515 2021

  23. [23]

    Skullerud, A

    J.-I. Skullerud, A. Kızılers¨ u, O. Oliveira, P. Silva, A. Sternbeck, Quark-gluon vertex with 2 flavours of O(a) improved Wilson fermions, PoS LATTICE2021 (2022) 305.arXiv:2111.13455,doi:10.22323/1.396. 0305

    work page doi:10.22323/1.396 2022

  24. [24]

    Marques, G

    J. Marques, G. Kalusche, T. Mendes, P. J. Silva, J.- I. Skullerud, O. Oliveira, The quark propagator and quark-gluon vertex from lattice QCD at finite temper- ature, PoS LATTICE2022 (2023) 280.arXiv:2301. 10607,doi:10.22323/1.430.0280

    work page doi:10.22323/1.430.0280 2023

  25. [25]

    A. I. Davydychev, P. Osland, L. Saks, Quark gluon vertex in arbitrary gauge and dimension, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 014022.arXiv:hep-ph/0008171,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.63.014022

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.63.014022 2001

  26. [26]

    A. I. Davydychev, P. Osland, L. Saks, One loop results for the quark gluon vertex in arbitrary dimension, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 89 (2000) 277–282.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0008202,doi:10.1016/S0920-5632(00)00856-2

    work page doi:10.1016/s0920-5632(00)00856-2 2000

  27. [27]

    J. A. Gracey, Two loop QCD vertices at the symmetric point, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 085011.arXiv:1108. 4806,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.085011. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 chirally symmetric chirality violating i Σ (i) A (0) DC1 SC 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 −0.50 −0.25 0.00 0.25 0.50 chirally symmetric chirality violating i Σ (i) B (0) [GeV] DC1 SC FIG. 22. ...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.085011 2011

  28. [28]

    Huang, P

    G. Huang, P. Zhuang, Quark-quark-gluon vertex for heavy quarks up to order 1/m 5, Phys. Rev. D 102 (1) (2020) 014034.arXiv:2004.10545,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.102.014034

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    von Smekal, P

    L. von Smekal, P. A. Amundsen, R. Alkofer, A Co- variant model for dynamical chiral symmetry break- ing in QCD, Nucl. Phys. A 529 (1991) 633–652.doi: 10.1016/0375-9474(91)90589-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0375-9474(91)90589-x 1991

  30. [30]

    Bender, W

    A. Bender, W. Detmold, C. D. Roberts, A. W. Thomas, Bethe-Salpeter equation and a nonperturbative quark gluon vertex, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 065203.arXiv: nucl-th/0202082,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.65.065203

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.065203 2002

  31. [31]

    Watson, W

    P. Watson, W. Cassing, P. C. Tandy, Bethe-Salpeter meson masses beyond ladder approximation, Few Body Syst. 35 (2004) 129–153.arXiv:hep-ph/0406340,doi: 10.1007/s00601-004-0067-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-004-0067-x 2004

  32. [32]

    M. S. Bhagwat, P. C. Tandy, Quark-gluon ver- tex model and lattice-QCD data, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 094039.arXiv:hep-ph/0407163,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.70.094039

    work page arXiv 2004

  33. [33]

    A. Holl, A. Krassnigg, C. D. Roberts, Confinement, DCSB, bound states, and the quark-gluon vertex, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 141 (2005) 47–52.arXiv:nucl-th/ 0408015,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.12.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.12.009 2005

  34. [34]

    C. S. Fischer, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, R. Alkofer, Dynam- ical mass generation in Landau gauge QCD, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 141 (2005) 128–133.arXiv:hep-ph/ 22 0407294,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.12.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2004.12.020 2005

  35. [35]

    F. J. Llanes-Estrada, C. S. Fischer, R. Alkofer, Semiper- turbative construction for the quark-gluon vertex, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 152 (2006) 43–46.arXiv:hep-ph/ 0407332,doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.08.008

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2005.08.008 2006

  36. [36]

    Alkofer, C

    R. Alkofer, C. S. Fischer, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, Dynam- ically induced scalar quark confinement, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 23 (2008) 1105–1113.arXiv:hep-ph/0607293, doi:10.1142/S021773230802700X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021773230802700x 2008

  37. [37]

    H. H. Matevosyan, A. W. Thomas, P. C. Tandy, Quark- gluon vertex dressing and meson masses beyond ladder- rainbow truncation, Phys. Rev. C 75 (2007) 045201. arXiv:nucl-th/0605057,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.75. 045201

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.75 2007

  38. [38]

    H. H. Matevosyan, A. W. Thomas, P. C. Tandy, Conse- quences Of Fully Dressing Quark-Gluon Vertex Func- tion With Two-Point Gluon Lines, J. Phys. G 34 (2007) 2153–2164.arXiv:0706.2393,doi:10.1088/ 0954-3899/34/10/005

    work page arXiv 2007

  39. [39]

    Alkofer, C

    R. Alkofer, C. S. Fischer, R. Williams, U(A)(1) anomaly and eta-prime mass from an infrared singular quark- gluon vertex, Eur. Phys. J. A 38 (2008) 53–60.arXiv: 0804.3478,doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10646-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2008-10646-x 2008

  40. [40]

    Alkofer, C

    R. Alkofer, C. S. Fischer, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, K. Schwenzer, The Quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge QCD: Its role in dynamical chiral symmetry breaking and quark confinement, Annals Phys. 324 (2009) 106– 172.arXiv:0804.3042,doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.07. 001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aop.2008.07 2009

  41. [41]

    He, Transverse Symmetry Transformations and the Quark-Gluon Vertex Function in QCD, Phys

    H.-x. He, Transverse Symmetry Transformations and the Quark-Gluon Vertex Function in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 80 (2009) 016004.arXiv:0906.2834,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.80.016004

    work page arXiv 2009

  42. [42]

    C. S. Fischer, R. Williams, Probing the gluon self- interaction in light mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 122001.arXiv:0905.2291,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 103.122001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2009

  43. [43]

    Windisch, M

    A. Windisch, M. Hopfer, R. Alkofer, Towards a self- consistent solution of the Landau gauge quark-gluon vertex Dyson-Schwinger equation, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 6 (2013) 347–352.arXiv:1210.8428,doi:10. 5506/APhysPolBSupp.6.347

    work page arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Hopfer, A

    M. Hopfer, A. Windisch, R. Alkofer, The Quark-Gluon Vertex in Landau gauge QCD, PoS ConfinementX (2012) 073.arXiv:1301.3672,doi:10.22323/1.171. 0073

    work page doi:10.22323/1.171 2012

  45. [45]

    A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, J. C. Cardona, J. Papavas- siliou, Nonperturbative results on the quark-gluon ver- tex, PoS ConfinementX (2012) 103.arXiv:1301.4057, doi:10.22323/1.171.0103

    work page doi:10.22323/1.171.0103 2012

  46. [46]

    Ayala, A

    A. Ayala, A. Bashir, D. Binosi, M. Cristoforetti, J. Rodriguez-Quintero, Quark flavour effects on gluon and ghost propagators, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012) 074512. arXiv:1208.0795,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.86.074512

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.86.074512 2012

  47. [47]

    Rojas, J

    E. Rojas, J. P. B. C. de Melo, B. El-Bennich, O. Oliveira, T. Frederico, On the Quark-Gluon Vertex and Quark-Ghost Kernel: combining Lattice Simula- tions with Dyson-Schwinger equations, JHEP 10 (2013) 193.arXiv:1306.3022,doi:10.1007/JHEP10(2013) 193

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep10(2013 2013

  48. [48]

    Alkofer, G

    R. Alkofer, G. Eichmann, C. S. Fischer, M. Hopfer, M. Vujinovic, R. Williams, A. Windisch, On propaga- tors and three-point functions in Landau gauge QCD and QCD-like theories, PoS QCD-TNT-III (2013) 003. arXiv:1405.7310,doi:10.22323/1.193.0003

    work page doi:10.22323/1.193.0003 2013

  49. [49]

    Williams, The quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge bound-state studies, Eur

    R. Williams, The quark-gluon vertex in Landau gauge bound-state studies, Eur. Phys. J. A 51 (5) (2015) 57. arXiv:1404.2545,doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15057-4

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/i2015-15057-4 2015

  50. [50]

    A. C. Aguilar, D. Binosi, D. Iba˜ nez, J. Papavassiliou, New method for determining the quark-gluon vertex, Phys. Rev. D 90 (6) (2014) 065027.arXiv:1405.3506, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.90.065027

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.90.065027 2014

  51. [51]

    Rojas, B

    E. Rojas, B. El-Bennich, J. P. B. C. De Melo, M. A. Paracha, Insights into the Quark–Gluon Vertex from Lattice QCD and Meson Spectroscopy, Few Body Syst. 56 (6-9) (2015) 639–644.arXiv:1409.8620,doi:10. 1007/s00601-015-1020-x

    work page arXiv 2015

  52. [52]

    Alexandrou, T

    A. Ayala, J. J. Cobos-Mart´ ınez, M. Loewe, M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, R. Zamora, Finite temperature quark- gluon vertex with a magnetic field in the Hard Ther- mal Loop approximation, Phys. Rev. D 91 (1) (2015) 016007.arXiv:1410.6388,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91. 016007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91 2015

  53. [53]

    Mitter, J

    M. Mitter, J. M. Pawlowski, N. Strodthoff, Chiral symmetry breaking in continuum QCD, Phys. Rev. D 91 (2015) 054035.arXiv:1411.7978,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.91.054035

    work page arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    H. Chen, J. B. Wei, M. Baldo, G. F. Burgio, H. J. Schulze, Hybrid neutron stars with the Dyson- Schwinger quark model and various quark-gluon ver- tices, Phys. Rev. D 91 (10) (2015) 105002.arXiv: 1503.02795,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.91.105002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.91.105002 2015

  55. [55]

    Pel´ aez, M

    M. Pel´ aez, M. Tissier, N. Wschebor, Quark-gluon vertex from the Landau gauge Curci-Ferrari model, Phys. Rev. D 92 (4) (2015) 045012.arXiv:1504.05157,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.92.045012

    work page arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Binosi, L

    D. Binosi, L. Chang, J. Papavassiliou, S.-X. Qin, C. D. Roberts, Natural constraints on the gluon-quark vertex, Phys. Rev. D 95 (3) (2017) 031501.arXiv:1609.02568, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.95.031501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.031501 2017

  57. [57]

    Williams, H

    R. Williams, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, Influence of the non- perturbative quark-gluon vertex on the meson and baryon spectrum, AIP Conf. Proc. 1701 (1) (2016) 040021.doi:10.1063/1.4938638

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4938638 2016

  58. [58]

    A. L. Blum, R. Alkofer, M. Q. Huber, A. Windisch, Unquenching the three-gluon vertex: A status report, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 8 (2) (2015) 321.arXiv:1506. 04275,doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.8.321

    work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.8.321 2015

  59. [59]

    A. L. Blum, R. Alkofer, M. Q. Huber, A. Windisch, Three-point vertex functions in Yang-Mills Theory and QCD in Landau gauge, EPJ Web Conf. 137 (2017) 03001.arXiv:1611.04827,doi:10.1051/epjconf/ 201713703001

    work page doi:10.1051/epjconf/ 2017

  60. [60]

    G´ omez-Rocha, T

    M. G´ omez-Rocha, T. Hilger, A. Krassnigg, First Look at Heavy–Light Mesons with a Dressed Quark–Gluon Vertex, Few Body Syst. 56 (6-9) (2015) 475–480.arXiv: 1408.1077,doi:10.1007/s00601-014-0938-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s00601-014-0938-8 2015

  61. [61]

    Gomez-Rocha, T

    M. Gomez-Rocha, T. Hilger, A. Krassnigg, Effects of a dressed quark-gluon vertex in pseudoscalar heavy-light mesons, Phys. Rev. D 92 (5) (2015) 054030.arXiv: 1506.03686,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.92.054030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.054030 2015

  62. [62]

    G´ omez-Rocha, T

    M. G´ omez-Rocha, T. Hilger, A. Krassnigg, Effects of a dressed quark-gluon vertex in vector heavy-light mesons and theory average of theB ∗ c meson mass, Phys. Rev. D 93 (7) (2016) 074010.arXiv:1602.05002,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.93.074010

    work page arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Bermudez, L

    R. Bermudez, L. Albino, L. X. Guti´ errez-Guerrero, M. E. Tejeda-Yeomans, A. Bashir, Quark-gluon Ver- 23 tex: A Perturbation Theory Primer and Beyond, Phys. Rev. D 95 (3) (2017) 034041.arXiv:1702.04437,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.95.034041

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.95.034041 2017

  64. [65]

    Contant, M

    R. Contant, M. Q. Huber, C. S. Fischer, C. A. Welzbacher, R. Williams, On the quark-gluon ver- tex at non-vanishing temperature, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp. 11 (2018) 483.arXiv:1805.05885,doi:10.5506/ APhysPolBSupp.11.483

    work page arXiv 2018

  65. [66]

    Oliveira, T

    O. Oliveira, T. Frederico, W. de Paula, J. P. B. C. de Melo, Exploring the Quark-Gluon Vertex with Slavnov-Taylor Identities and Lattice Simulations, Eur. Phys. J. C 78 (7) (2018) 553.arXiv:1807.00675, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6037-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-018-6037-0 2018

  66. [69]

    Vujinovic, R

    M. Vujinovic, R. Alkofer, Low-energy spectrum of an SU(2) gauge theory with dynamical fermions, Phys. Rev. D 98 (9) (2018) 095030.arXiv:1809.02650,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.095030

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.095030 2018

  67. [70]

    Oliveira, T

    O. Oliveira, T. Frederico, W. de Paula, The soft-gluon limit and the infrared enhancement of the quark-gluon vertex, Eur. Phys. J. C 80 (5) (2020) 484.arXiv:2006. 04982,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8037-0

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-8037-0 2020

  68. [71]

    F. Gao, J. Papavassiliou, J. M. Pawlowski, Fully coupled functional equations for the quark sector of QCD, Phys. Rev. D 103 (9) (2021) 094013.arXiv:2102.13053,doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.094013

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.094013 2021

  69. [72]

    El-Bennich, F

    B. El-Bennich, F. E. Serna, R. C. da Silveira, L. A. F. Rangel, A. Bashir, E. Rojas, Dressed quark-gluon ver- tex form factors from gauge symmetry, Rev. Mex. Fis. Suppl. 3 (3) (2022) 0308092.arXiv:2201.04144,doi: 10.31349/SuplRevMexFis.3.0308092

    work page doi:10.31349/suplrevmexfis.3.0308092 2022

  70. [73]

    A. C. Aguilar, M. . N. Ferreira, D. Iba˜ nez, J. Papavassil- iou, Schwinger displacement of the quark–gluon vertex, Eur. Phys. J. C 83 (10) (2023) 967.arXiv:2308.16297, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12103-8

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-023-12103-8 2023

  71. [74]

    A. C. Aguilar, M. N. Ferreira, B. M. Oliveira, J. Pa- pavassiliou, G. T. Linhares, Infrared properties of the quark-gluon vertex in general kinematics, Eur. Phys. J. C 84 (11) (2024) 1231.arXiv:2408.15370,doi: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13605-9

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-024-13605-9 2024

  72. [75]

    Alkofer, Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Chromo Dynamics: Delicate and Intricate, Symmetry 15 (9) (2023) 1787.arXiv:2309.09679,doi: 10.3390/sym15091787

    R. Alkofer, Dynamical Chiral Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Chromo Dynamics: Delicate and Intricate, Symmetry 15 (9) (2023) 1787.arXiv:2309.09679,doi: 10.3390/sym15091787

    work page doi:10.3390/sym15091787 2023

  73. [76]

    Alkofer, F

    R. Alkofer, F. J. Llanes-Estrada, A. Salas-Bernardez, Spinning pairs: Supporting P03 quark-pair creation from Landau-gauge Green’s functions, Phys. Rev. D 109 (7) (2024) 074015.arXiv:2312.14994,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.109.074015

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [78]

    W.-j. Fu, C. Huang, J. M. Pawlowski, Y.-y. Tan, L.-j. Zhou, Four-quark scatterings in QCD III, Phys. Rev. D 112 (5) (2025) 054047.arXiv:2502.14388,doi:10. 1103/4sh5-w4yc

    work page arXiv 2025

  75. [80]

    M. N. Ferreira, A. S. Miramontes, J. M. Morgado, J. Pa- pavassiliou, Light mesons in the symmetric-vertex ap- proximation,arXiv:2604.07221

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [81]

    Alkofer, W

    R. Alkofer, W. Detmold, C. S. Fischer, P. Maris, An- alytic properties of the Landau gauge gluon and quark propagators, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 014014.arXiv: hep-ph/0309077,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.70.014014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.70.014014 2004

  77. [83]

    M. Q. Huber, https://github.com/markusqh/YM data

  78. [85]

    M. Q. Huber, Nonperturbative properties of Yang–Mills theories, Phys. Rept. 879 (2020) 1–92.arXiv:1808. 05227,doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2020.04.004 2020

  79. [87]

    M. Q. Huber, C. S. Fischer, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, Higher spin glueballs from functional methods, Eur. Phys. J. C 81 (12) (2021) 1083, [Erratum: Eur.Phys.J.C 82, 38 (2022)].arXiv:2110.09180,doi:10.1140/epjc/ s10052-021-09864-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/ 2021

  80. [88]

    M. Q. Huber, C. S. Fischer, H. Sanchis-Alepuz, Ap- parent convergence in functional glueball calculations, Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (8) (2025) 859.arXiv:2503.03821, doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14590-3

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14590-3 2025

Showing first 80 references.