Recognition: unknown
Deep VLBI constraints on compact radio cores in four ultraluminous X-ray sources
Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:29 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Deep VLBI observations of four ultraluminous X-ray sources detect no compact radio cores on milliarcsecond scales.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
No compact emission was detected on milliarcsecond scales in Holmberg II X-1, IC 342 X-1, NGC 6946 X-1, and NGC 925 X-1, with rms noise levels of approximately 5-20 μJy. The corresponding 5σ flux density upper limits reach ∼26 μJy, implying radio luminosity limits L_R ≲ 2×10^33 erg s^{-1}. This disfavors any persistently bright hard-state-like compact core at the achieved sensitivity level. The previously reported VLBI core in Holmberg II X-1 shows significant long-term variability consistent with emission from optically thin ejecta undergoing adiabatic expansion.
What carries the argument
High-sensitivity VLBI providing milliarcsecond resolution upper limits on radio flux density from the ULX positions.
Load-bearing premise
Any persistently bright hard-state-like compact core would have been detectable above the rms noise levels achieved in these VLBI observations.
What would settle it
Detection of compact radio emission exceeding the 26 μJy upper limit in any of the four sources during a comparable VLBI observation would falsify the claim that such cores are disfavored.
Figures
read the original abstract
We present high-sensitivity Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations of four ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs): Holmberg II X-1, IC 342 X-1, NGC 6946 X-1, and NGC 925 X-1. No compact emission was detected on milliarcsecond scales, with rms noise levels reaching approximately 5--20 $\mu$Jy. The corresponding $5\sigma$ flux density upper limits reach $\sim 26\,\mu\mathrm{Jy}$, implying radio luminosity limits $L_{\rm R} \lesssim 2 \times 10^{33}\,\mathrm{erg\,s^{-1}}$. This disfavors any persistently bright hard-state-like compact core at our sensitivity level. The previously reported VLBI core in Holmberg II X-1 exhibits significant long-term variability, broadly consistent with an overall decline over the past decades. This behavior is consistent with emission from optically-thin ejecta undergoing adiabatic expansion. The VLBI non-detections may reflect intrinsically weak/intermittent compact emission, and/or low--surface--brightness structure that is resolved out by VLBI, and/or absorption/propagation effects such as free--free absorption in dense, ionized winds.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports deep VLBI observations of four ULXs (Holmberg II X-1, IC 342 X-1, NGC 6946 X-1, NGC 925 X-1). No compact milliarcsecond-scale emission is detected, with rms noise levels of 5–20 μJy yielding 5σ upper limits of ∼26 μJy and radio luminosity limits L_R ≲ 2×10^33 erg s^{-1}. These limits disfavor persistently bright hard-state-like compact cores. The previously reported VLBI detection in Holmberg II X-1 shows long-term variability consistent with a decline, interpretable as optically thin ejecta in adiabatic expansion. Non-detections are attributed to intrinsically weak/intermittent cores, resolved low-surface-brightness structure, or absorption effects.
Significance. These direct observational upper limits provide useful constraints on compact radio emission from ULXs, helping to test models of accretion states and jet activity. The variability discussion for Holmberg II X-1 adds context on possible evolutionary behavior of radio components. The cautious interpretation (listing variability, resolution, and absorption as possible explanations) strengthens the result by avoiding overclaim.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract and Introduction] In the abstract and §1, the rms noise range (5–20 μJy) is given as approximate; listing the measured rms and 5σ limit for each individual target in a table would improve clarity and allow direct comparison to prior detections.
- [Discussion] The discussion of possible non-detection causes (variability, resolved structure, free–free absorption) is appropriately qualified, but a brief quantitative estimate of the expected flux from a hard-state core scaled to the observed X-ray luminosities would help readers assess the strength of the disfavoring claim.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of the VLBI results, and recommendation to accept. We are pleased that the referee finds the upper limits useful for testing accretion and jet models and notes the cautious interpretation as a strength.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity; results are direct observational upper limits
full rationale
The paper's central claims consist of empirical VLBI non-detections at reported rms noise levels (5-20 μJy), yielding 5σ upper limits (~26 μJy) and luminosity bounds (L_R ≲ 2×10^33 erg s^{-1}). These follow directly from the described array configurations, integration times, calibration, and imaging procedures without any equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that reduce the limits to inputs by construction. The discussion of non-detection causes (variability, resolved-out structure, absorption) is interpretive qualification rather than a load-bearing derivation. No self-definitional, fitted-input, or uniqueness-theorem patterns appear; the work is self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- standard math Standard VLBI calibration, phase referencing, and imaging procedures produce the reported rms noise levels without significant unaccounted systematics.
- domain assumption Source distances used to convert flux density upper limits to luminosity limits are accurate.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Abolmasov, P. 2008, Ultraluminous X-ray Sources and Their Nebulae, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 1054, Cool Discs, Hot Flows: The Varying Faces of Accreting Compact Objects, ed. M. Axelsson (AIP), 33–38, doi: 10.1063/1.3002506
-
[2]
An, T., Wu, X., Lao, B., et al. 2022, Status and progress of China SKA Regional Centre prototype, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 65, 129501, doi: 10.1007/s11433-022-1981-8
-
[3]
2019, SKA data take centre stage in
An, T., Wu, X.-P., & Hong, X. 2019, SKA data take centre stage in
2019
-
[4]
China, Nature Astronomy, 3, 1030, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0943-4
-
[5]
Anand, G. S., Rizzi, L., & Tully, R. B. 2018, A Robust Tip of the Red Giant Branch Distance to the Fireworks Galaxy (NGC 6946), AJ, 156, 105, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad3b2
-
[6]
Asahina, Y ., & Ohsuga, K. 2024, General Relativistic Radiation Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations of Precessing Tilted Super-Eddington Disks, ApJ, 973, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6cd9 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, Astropy: A community Python package for astronomy, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 A...
-
[7]
Berghea, C. T., Johnson, M. C., Secrest, N. J., et al. 2020, Detection of a Radio Bubble around the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source Holmberg IX X-1, ApJ, 896, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9108
-
[8]
Beuchert, T., Middleton, M. J., Soria, R., et al. 2024, Exploring the case for hard-X-ray beaming in NGC 6946 X-1, MNRAS, 534, 645, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1975
-
[9]
Blair, W. P., Fesen, R. A., & Schlegel, E. M. 2001, Hubble Space Telescope Images of the Ultraluminous Supernova Remnant Complex in NGC 6946, AJ, 121, 1497, doi: 10.1086/319426
-
[10]
Blundell, K. M., & Bowler, M. G. 2004, Symmetry in the Changing Jets of SS 433 and Its True Distance from Us, ApJL, 616, L159, doi: 10.1086/426542
-
[11]
Corbel, S., Coriat, M., Brocksopp, C., et al. 2013, The ‘universal’ radio/X-ray flux correlation: the case study of the black hole GX 339-4, MNRAS, 428, 2500, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts215
-
[12]
Cseh, D., Corbel, S., Kaaret, P., et al. 2012, Black Hole Powered Nebulae and a Case Study of the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source IC 342 X-1, ApJ, 749, 17, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/17 VLBIOBSERVATIONS OFULXS9
-
[14]
Cseh, D., Kaaret, P., Corbel, S., et al. 2014b, Unveiling recurrent jets of the ULX Holmberg II X-1: evidence for a massive stellar-mass black hole?, MNRAS, 439, L1, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slt166
-
[15]
Cseh, D., Webb, N. A., Godet, O., et al. 2015a, On the radio properties of the intermediate-mass black hole candidate ESO 243-49 HLX-1, MNRAS, 446, 3268, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2363
-
[16]
Cseh, D., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2015b, The evolution of a jet ejection of the ultraluminous X-ray source Holmberg II X-1, MNRAS, 452, 24, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1308
-
[17]
T., Brisken, W
Deller, A. T., Brisken, W. F., Phillips, C. J., et al. 2011, DiFX-2: A More Flexible, Efficient, Robust, and Powerful Software
2011
-
[18]
Correlator, PASP, 123, 275, doi: 10.1086/658907
-
[19]
Dhawan, V ., Mirabel, I. F., & Rodríguez, L. F. 2000, AU-Scale Synchrotron Jets and Superluminal Ejecta in GRS 1915+105, ApJ, 543, 373, doi: 10.1086/317088
-
[20]
Dubner, G. M., Holdaway, M., Goss, W. M., & Mirabel, I. F. 1998, A High-Resolution Radio Study of the W50-SS 433 System and the Surrounding Medium, AJ, 116, 1842, doi: 10.1086/300537
-
[21]
2004, The jets and supercritical accretion disk in SS433, Astrophys
Fabrika, S. 2004, The jets and supercritical accretion disk in SS433, Astrophys. Space Phys. Res., 12, 1, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0603390
-
[22]
Fabrika, S., Ueda, Y ., Vinokurov, A., Sholukhova, O., & Shidatsu, M. 2015, Supercritical accretion disks in ultraluminous X-ray sources and SS 433, Nature Physics, 11, 551, doi: 10.1038/nphys3348
-
[23]
Fabrika, S. N., Atapin, K. E., Vinokurov, A. S., & Sholukhova, O. N. 2021, Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources, Astrophysical Bulletin, 76, 6, doi: 10.1134/S1990341321010077
-
[24]
2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x
Fender, R. P., Belloni, T. M., & Gallo, E. 2004, Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets, MNRAS, 355, 1105, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08384.x
-
[25]
F., Capozziello, S., & Dainotti, M
Fender, R. P., Homan, J., & Belloni, T. M. 2009, Jets from black hole X-ray binaries: testing, refining and extending empirical models for the coupling to X-rays, MNRAS, 396, 1370, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14841.x
-
[26]
Ferrarese, L., Ford, H. C., Huchra, J., et al. 2000, A Database of Cepheid Distance Moduli and Tip of the Red Giant Branch, Globular Cluster Luminosity Function, Planetary Nebula Luminosity Function, and Surface Brightness Fluctuation Data Useful for Distance Determinations, ApJS, 128, 431, doi: 10.1086/313391
-
[27]
F., Capozziello, S., & Dainotti, M
Gladstone, J. C., Roberts, T. P., & Done, C. 2009, The ultraluminous state, MNRAS, 397, 1836, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15123.x
-
[28]
Greisen, E. W. 2003, AIPS, the VLA, and the VLBA, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 285, Information Handling in Astronomy - Historical Vistas, ed. A. Heck, 109, doi: 10.1007/0-306-48080-8_7
-
[29]
Heida, M., Jonker, P. G., Torres, M. A. P., et al. 2016, Keck/MOSFIRE spectroscopy of five ULX counterparts, MNRAS, 459, 771, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw695
-
[30]
Jeffrey, R. M., Blundell, K. M., Trushkin, S. A., & Mioduszewski, A. J. 2016, Fast launch speeds in radio flares, from a new determination of the intrinsic motions of SS 433’s jet bolides, MNRAS, 461, 312, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1322
-
[31]
Kaaret, P., Feng, H., & Roberts, T. P. 2017, Ultraluminous X-Ray
2017
-
[32]
Sources, ARA&A, 55, 303, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259
-
[33]
2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x
Kaaret, P., Ward, M. J., & Zezas, A. 2004, High-resolution imaging of the HeIIλ4686 emission line nebula associated with the ultraluminous X-ray source in Holmberg II, MNRAS, 351, L83, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08020.x
-
[34]
Keimpema, A., Kettenis, M. M., Pogrebenko, S. V ., et al. 2015, The SFXC software correlator for very long baseline interferometry: algorithms and implementation, Experimental Astronomy, 39, 259, doi: 10.1007/s10686-015-9446-1
-
[35]
King, A., Lasota, J.-P., & Middleton, M. 2023, Ultraluminous X-ray sources, NewAR, 96, 101672, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672
-
[36]
Koljonen, K. I. I., & Russell, D. M. 2019, The Radio/X-Ray Correlation in X-Ray Binaries—Insights from a Hard X-Ray
2019
-
[37]
Perspective, ApJ, 871, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf38f
-
[38]
Lacey, C., Duric, N., & Goss, W. M. 1997, A Survey of Compact Radio Sources in NGC 6946, ApJS, 109, 417, doi: 10.1086/312989
-
[39]
Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, The Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array Sky Survey (VLASS). Science Case and Survey Design, PASP, 132, 035001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb
-
[40]
C., Kaaret, P., Corbel, S., & Mercer, A
Lang, C. C., Kaaret, P., Corbel, S., & Mercer, A. 2007, A Radio Nebula Surrounding the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source in NGC 5408, ApJ, 666, 79, doi: 10.1086/519553 Lara-López, M. A., Zinchenko, I. A., Pilyugin, L. S., et al. 2021, Metal-THINGS: On the Metallicity and Ionization of ULX Sources in NGC 925, ApJ, 906, 42, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc892
-
[41]
Lehmann, I., Becker, T., Fabrika, S., et al. 2005, Integral field spectroscopy of the ultraluminous X-ray source Holmberg II X-1, A&A, 431, 847, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20035827
-
[42]
C.-C., Hu, C.-P., Li, K.-L., et al
Lin, L. C.-C., Hu, C.-P., Li, K.-L., et al. 2020, Investigation of X-ray timing and spectral properties of ESO 243-49 HLX-1 with long-term Swift monitoring, MNRAS, 491, 5682, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3372 10 WANG ET AL
-
[43]
Madhusudhan, N., Rappaport, S., Podsiadlowski, P., & Nelson, L. 2008, Models for the Observable System Parameters of Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources, ApJ, 688, 1235, doi: 10.1086/592237
-
[44]
Marlowe, H., Kaaret, P., Lang, C., et al. 2014, Spectral state transitions of the Ultraluminous X-ray Source IC 342 X-1, MNRAS, 444, 642, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1471
-
[45]
Meier, D. L. 1982, The structure and appearance of winds from supercritical accretion disks. II - Dynamical theory of supercritical winds, ApJ, 256, 681, doi: 10.1086/159942
-
[46]
Merloni, A., Heinz, S., & di Matteo, T. 2003, A Fundamental Plane of black hole activity, MNRAS, 345, 1057, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2966.2003.07017.x
-
[47]
Mezcua, M., Farrell, S. A., Gladstone, J. C., & Lobanov, A. P. 2013, Milliarcsec-scale radio emission of ultraluminous X-ray sources: steady jet emission from an intermediate-mass black hole?, MNRAS, 436, 1546, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1674
-
[48]
Mezcua, M., & Lobanov, A. P. 2011, Compact radio emission in Ultraluminous X-ray sources, Astronomische Nachrichten, 332, 379, doi: 10.1002/asna.201011504
-
[49]
Middleton, M. J., Walton, D. J., Fabian, A., et al. 2015, Diagnosing the accretion flow in ultraluminous X-ray sources using soft X-ray atomic features, MNRAS, 454, 3134, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2214
-
[50]
Middleton, M. J., Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Markoff, S., et al. 2013, Bright radio emission from an ultraluminous stellar-mass microquasar in M 31, Nature, 493, 187, doi: 10.1038/nature11697
-
[51]
Middleton, M. J., Walton, D. J., Alston, W., et al. 2021, NuSTAR reveals the hidden nature of SS433, MNRAS, 506, 1045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1280
-
[52]
Klis, M. 2005, Rapid variability of the arcsec-scale X-ray jets of SS 433, MNRAS, 358, 860, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08791.x
-
[53]
Miller, N. A., Mushotzky, R. F., & Neff, S. G. 2005, Radio Emission Associated with the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source in Holmberg II, ApJL, 623, L109, doi: 10.1086/430112
-
[54]
Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Jonker, P. G., Dhawan, V ., et al. 2009, The First Accurate Parallax Distance to a Black Hole, ApJL, 706, L230, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/L230
-
[55]
, archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =
Mineo, S., Gilfanov, M., & Sunyaev, R. 2012, X-ray emission from star-forming galaxies - I. High-mass X-ray binaries, MNRAS, 419, 2095, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19862.x
-
[56]
W., Soria, R., Grisé, F., & Pietrzy´nski, G
Motch, C., Pakull, M. W., Soria, R., Grisé, F., & Pietrzy´nski, G. 2014, A mass of less than 15 solar masses for the black hole in an ultraluminous X-ray source, Nature, 514, 198, doi: 10.1038/nature13730
-
[57]
Optical Counterparts of Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources
Pakull, M. W., & Mirioni, L. 2002, Optical Counterparts of Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources, arXiv e-prints, astro, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0202488
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0202488 2002
-
[58]
Pakull, M. W., Soria, R., & Motch, C. 2010, A 300-parsec-long jet-inflated bubble around a powerful microquasar in the galaxy NGC 7793, Nature, 466, 209, doi: 10.1038/nature09168
-
[59]
Pannuti, T. G., Duric, N., Lacey, C. K., et al. 2002, An X-Ray, Optical, and Radio Search for Supernova Remnants in the Nearby Sculptor Group Sd Galaxy NGC 7793, ApJ, 565, 966, doi: 10.1086/337918
-
[60]
Panurach, T., Dage, K. C., Urquhart, R., et al. 2024, Do Neutron Star Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources Masquerade as Intermediate-mass Black Holes in Radio and X-Ray?, ApJ, 977, 211, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8b9c
-
[61]
Paragi, Z., van der Horst, A. J., Belloni, T., et al. 2013, VLBI observations of the shortest orbital period black hole binary, MAXI J1659-152, MNRAS, 432, 1319, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt545
-
[62]
Pinto, C., Middleton, M. J., & Fabian, A. C. 2016, Resolved atomic lines reveal outflows in two ultraluminous X-ray sources, Nature, 533, 64, doi: 10.1038/nature17417
-
[63]
Pinto, C., & Walton, D. J. 2023, Ultra-luminous X-ray sources: extreme accretion and feedback, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.00006, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.00006
-
[64]
Abolmasov, P. 2007, Supercritically accreting stellar mass black holes as ultraluminous X-ray sources, MNRAS, 377, 1187, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11668.x
-
[65]
Qiu, Y ., & Feng, H. 2021, Linking Soft Excess in Ultraluminous X-Ray Sources with Optically Thick Wind Driven by Supercritical Accretion, ApJ, 906, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc959
-
[66]
Roberts, T. P., Goad, M. R., Ward, M. J., & Warwick, R. S. 2003, The unusual supernova remnant surrounding the ultraluminous X-ray source IC 342 X-1, MNRAS, 342, 709, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06593.x
-
[67]
Saha, A., Claver, J., & Hoessel, J. G. 2002, Cepheids and Long-Period Variables in IC 342, AJ, 124, 839, doi: 10.1086/341649
-
[68]
Saha, A., Thim, F., Tammann, G. A., Reindl, B., & Sandage, A. 2006, Cepheid Distances to SNe Ia Host Galaxies Based on a Revised Photometric Zero Point of the HST WFPC2 and New PL Relations and Metallicity Corrections, ApJS, 165, 108, doi: 10.1086/503800
-
[69]
2015, MNRAS, 453, 3213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1802
Shepherd, M. C., Pearson, T. J., & Taylor, G. B. 1994, DIFMAP: an interactive program for synthesis imaging., in Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, V ol. 26, 987–989 S ˛ adowski, A., & Narayan, R. 2015, Powerful radiative jets in supercritical accretion discs around non-spinning black holes, MNRAS, 453, 3213, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1802 VLBIOBS...
-
[70]
Soria, R., Pakull, M. W., Broderick, J. W., Corbel, S., & Motch, C. 2010, Radio lobes and X-ray hotspots in the microquasar S26, MNRAS, 409, 541, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17360.x
-
[71]
Soria, R., Pakull, M. W., Motch, C., et al. 2021, The ultraluminous X-ray source bubble in NGC 5585, MNRAS, 501, 1644, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3784
-
[72]
2004, MNRAS, 351, 1379, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07876.x
Stirling, A. M., Spencer, R. E., Cawthorne, T. V ., & Paragi, Z. 2004, Polarization and kinematic studies of SS 433 indicate a continuous and decelerating jet, MNRAS, 354, 1239, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08285.x
-
[73]
2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x
Stirling, A. M., Spencer, R. E., de la Force, C. J., et al. 2001, A relativistic jet from Cygnus X-1 in the low/hard X-ray state, MNRAS, 327, 1273, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04821.x
-
[74]
Su, Y ., Zhou, X., Yang, J., et al. 2018, The Large-scale Interstellar Medium of SS 433/W50 Revisited, ApJ, 863, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aad04e
-
[75]
Urquhart, R., Soria, R., Johnston, H. M., et al. 2018, Multiband counterparts of two eclipsing ultraluminous X-ray sources in M 51, MNRAS, 475, 3561, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty014
-
[76]
Urquhart, R., Soria, R., Pakull, M. W., et al. 2019, A newly discovered double-double candidate microquasar in NGC 300, MNRAS, 482, 2389, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2771 van Dyk, S. D., Sramek, R. A., Weiler, K. W., Hyman, S. D., &
-
[77]
Virden, R. E. 1994, The Radio Counterpart to the Luminous X-Ray Supernova Remnant in NGC 6946, ApJL, 425, L77, doi: 10.1086/187314
-
[78]
Webb, N., Cseh, D., Lenc, E., et al. 2012, Radio Detections During Two State Transitions of the Intermediate-Mass Black Hole HLX-1, Science, 337, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1222779
-
[79]
Beswick, R. J. 2025, An e-MERLIN & EVN radio counterpart to the ultraluminous X-ray source M82 X-1, MNRAS, 540, 239, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf685
-
[80]
Zhang, Y ., Feng, H., Wang, A., & Soria, R. 2026, Radio counterparts of ultraluminous X-ray sources in nearby galaxies, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.01540, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.01540
-
[81]
Zhou, C., Feng, H., & Bian, F. 2023, Identification of a Helium Donor Star in NGC 247 ULX-1, ApJ, 947, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc5eb
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.