pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.20663 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · ✦ hep-th

Recognition: unknown

Towering Gravitons in AdS₃/CFT₂

Marcel R. R. Hughes , Kohei Jin , Daiki Matsumoto , Leon Miyahara , Masaki Shigemori
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 23:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords AdS3/CFT2BPS statessupergravitonssingletonsD1-D5 CFTaffine multipletsHilbert spacedeformation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dressing supergravitons with singletons extends the BPS spectrum into a decomposable gravity-sector Hilbert space

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a method to include additional boundary degrees of freedom, called singletons, into the light BPS states known as supergravitons in three-dimensional anti-de Sitter gravity dual to a two-dimensional conformal field theory. By combining these singletons with supergravitons, a broader set of states is obtained that can be organized according to the symmetries of the full superconformal algebra. Calculations in a specific model show that this enlarged set reproduces the known spectrum of the dual theory up to a certain energy level at the free point, and to a higher level once interactions are turned on because some states move away. The authors propose that this separation corresponds to distinguishing monotone from fortuitous states in the deformed theory.

Core claim

A general procedure extends the BPS spectrum of supergravitons by dressing them with singletons to define a generalized gravity-sector Hilbert space that decomposes into affine multiplets of the full superconformal algebra. Applied to the N=2 D1-D5 CFT, this yields explicit multiplets up to level h=2, with spectral agreement to the CFT improving from h=1/2 to h=3/2 upon deformation as h=1 states lift due to mixing with stringy states. The authors conjecture that deformation maps the gravity-sector Hilbert space to the monotone Hilbert space and its complement to the fortuitous Hilbert space.

What carries the argument

The dressing procedure that attaches singletons to supergravitons, allowing the resulting states to be grouped into affine multiplets under the superconformal algebra.

If this is right

  • The procedure removes the low-level restriction of earlier work and applies up to h=2 for the N=2 case.
  • Agreement between gravity-sector states and the full CFT spectrum holds to h=1/2 at the free orbifold point.
  • After deformation, lifting of h=1 states extends the agreement to h=3/2.
  • The lifting mechanism mixes gravity-sector states with stringy states.
  • Upon deformation the gravity sector is conjectured to map to the monotone Hilbert space.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the conjecture holds, the monotone and fortuitous Hilbert spaces acquire a direct interpretation in terms of gravitational and non-gravitational degrees of freedom.
  • The dressing method may apply to other CFTs with similar boundary degrees of freedom, offering a way to isolate the gravitational spectrum more generally.
  • Further calculations could check whether the multiplet decomposition persists at higher levels or for larger N.
  • Such a separation might help in understanding the transition between perturbative gravity and stringy regimes in holographic models.

Load-bearing premise

Dressing supergravitons with singletons yields states that can be cleanly separated into a gravity sector whose spectrum matches the CFT under deformation without invalidating the multiplet structure.

What would settle it

A direct computation in the deformed D1-D5 theory revealing that the number of unlifted states at h=3/2 in the gravity sector does not equal the number expected from the CFT spectrum.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.20663 by Daiki Matsumoto, Kohei Jin, Leon Miyahara, Marcel R. R. Hughes, Masaki Shigemori.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A schematic illustration of the structure of the BPS Hilbert space in the free symmetric orbifold CFT. The BPS graviton Hilbert space, H graviton 0 , shown in blue, is a subspace of the CFT BPS Hilbert space, HCFT 0 . Adding singleton excitations extends H graviton 0 to the BPS gravity Hilbert space, H gravity 0 , shown in red. Upon turning on the deformation, some set of states in these BPS spaces, V lift… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: In fact, we will find that, once interaction is turned on, the long gravity towers in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The structure of the affine tower aJ,H on the j-h plane. The tower aJ,H contains global multiplets sj,h with (j, h) in the blue shaded region. The dot indicates the “base” of the tower where the affine primary is. States of the CFT exist only in the gray shaded region bounded from below by the unitarity bound shown as the black dashed lines. Namely, the ordering is by increasing H, and for fixed H, by decr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

BPS states in holographic CFTs are usually classified into supergravitons, namely BPS fluctuations around empty AdS, and black-hole microstates, which appear above an energy threshold. In AdS$_3$/CFT$_2$, however, this picture is incomplete because of additional degrees of freedom, called singletons, associated with boundary diffeomorphisms. We present a general procedure for extending the BPS spectrum of supergravitons by dressing them with singletons, thereby defining a generalized, gravity-sector Hilbert space that admits decomposition into affine multiplets of the full superconformal algebra. This extends the procedure previously proposed in arXiv:2505.14888 which was applicable only at low levels, by removing that limitation. We apply the new procedure to the D1-D5 CFT ${\rm Sym}^N(T^4)$ and explicitly construct affine multiplets in the gravity sector for the $N=2$ theory up to level $h=2$. We find that, at the free orbifold point, the gravity-sector spectrum agrees with the CFT up to $h=\frac12$. Upon turning on a deformation, however, states at $h=1$ lift and the agreement improves to $h=\frac32$. Interestingly, the lifting occurs between states in the gravity sector, involving mixtures of supergravitons and singletons, and stringy states. We conjecture that, upon deformation, the gravity-sector Hilbert space becomes the monotone Hilbert space while its complement becomes the fortuitous Hilbert space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to present a general procedure for extending the BPS spectrum of supergravitons in AdS3/CFT2 by dressing them with singletons, thereby defining a generalized gravity-sector Hilbert space that decomposes into affine multiplets of the full superconformal algebra. This removes the low-level restriction of prior work (arXiv:2505.14888). For the N=2 D1-D5 CFT Sym^2(T^4), explicit constructions of affine multiplets are given up to h=2; the gravity-sector spectrum agrees with the CFT up to h=1/2 at the free orbifold point, and deformation induces lifting at h=1 (involving mixing with stringy states) that improves agreement to h=3/2. The authors conjecture that the deformed gravity sector coincides with the monotone Hilbert space and its complement with the fortuitous Hilbert space.

Significance. If the general dressing procedure and its affine decomposition hold beyond the verified cases, the work would supply a concrete method for isolating the gravity sector in the BPS spectrum of AdS3/CFT2, clarifying the role of singletons associated with boundary diffeomorphisms and the selective lifting under deformations. The explicit N=2 constructions up to h=2 and the reported spectrum agreements provide testable examples, while the conjecture linking to monotone/fortuitous spaces could inform broader questions about black-hole microstates versus supergraviton fluctuations.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and procedure description] Abstract and procedure description: the central claim is that the singleton-dressing procedure yields a well-defined gravity-sector Hilbert space whose states decompose cleanly into affine multiplets independent of the low-level restriction of the prior work. However, the manuscript supplies an explicit construction only for Sym^2(T^4) up to h=2 and reports agreement only up to h=1/2 (free) and h=3/2 (deformed). A general argument is required to rule out overcounting or failure of the multiplet structure when multiple singletons or higher oscillator levels are included.
  2. [Deformation and lifting section] Deformation and lifting section: the observed lifting at h=1 is reported to involve mixtures of supergravitons and singletons with stringy states and to improve agreement to h=3/2. Without an explicit derivation of the mixing rules and a demonstration that this lifting continues to isolate the monotone subspace at higher levels, the conjecture equating the deformed gravity sector with the monotone Hilbert space rests on extrapolation from limited data.
  3. [Spectrum agreement claims] Spectrum agreement claims: agreement is stated up to h=1/2 at the free point and h=3/2 after deformation, but the manuscript should provide the explicit list or table of compared states (including their quantum numbers) to allow independent verification that the dressing rules produce the reported matches without redundancy.
minor comments (2)
  1. The connection between the 'towering' in the title and the infinite towers generated by repeated singleton dressing could be spelled out explicitly in the introduction for clarity.
  2. Notation for the affine multiplets of the superconformal algebra and for the dressing operation should be introduced once and used consistently; cross-references to the prior arXiv:2505.14888 work would help readers track the generalization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and insightful comments, which highlight areas where the manuscript can be strengthened. We address each major comment below, indicating revisions where appropriate to clarify the general procedure, provide additional details on deformations, and include explicit state comparisons.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and procedure description] the central claim is that the singleton-dressing procedure yields a well-defined gravity-sector Hilbert space whose states decompose cleanly into affine multiplets independent of the low-level restriction of the prior work. However, the manuscript supplies an explicit construction only for Sym^2(T^4) up to h=2 and reports agreement only up to h=1/2 (free) and h=3/2 (deformed). A general argument is required to rule out overcounting or failure of the multiplet structure when multiple singletons or higher oscillator levels are included.

    Authors: The singleton-dressing procedure is defined in Section 2 in a manner independent of level restrictions, using the commutation relations of the superconformal algebra to ensure that any supergraviton state dressed by an arbitrary number of singletons remains within an affine multiplet. Overcounting is avoided by adopting a normal-ordered basis for the singleton modes and projecting onto irreducible representations under the algebra action. While the explicit checks are limited to the N=2 case up to h=2 as stated, the general structure follows inductively from the algebra. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection with a proof sketch demonstrating that the multiplet decomposition and absence of overcounting hold for multiple singletons and higher oscillator levels. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Deformation and lifting section] the observed lifting at h=1 is reported to involve mixtures of supergravitons and singletons with stringy states and to improve agreement to h=3/2. Without an explicit derivation of the mixing rules and a demonstration that this lifting continues to isolate the monotone subspace at higher levels, the conjecture equating the deformed gravity sector with the monotone Hilbert space rests on extrapolation from limited data.

    Authors: Section 4 derives the lifting at h=1 by explicitly computing the action of the deformation operator on the dressed gravity-sector states, which induces mixing with stringy excitations and lifts non-monotone combinations. This mechanism is what extends the agreement to h=3/2. We agree that further explicit computations at higher levels would bolster the conjecture. In the revision, we will include an expanded discussion of the mixing rules with additional matrix element examples at h=3/2 and clarify that the identification with the monotone Hilbert space is a conjecture motivated by the selective nature of the lifting, while noting that a complete demonstration for all levels is left for future work. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Spectrum agreement claims] agreement is stated up to h=1/2 at the free point and h=3/2 after deformation, but the manuscript should provide the explicit list or table of compared states (including their quantum numbers) to allow independent verification that the dressing rules produce the reported matches without redundancy.

    Authors: We accept this recommendation and will add an explicit table (or appendix) in the revised manuscript. This table will list all states in the gravity sector up to h=2, including their quantum numbers (such as h, j, and R-charges), the decomposition into supergraviton and singleton components, the corresponding CFT states at the free orbifold point, and the status after deformation (including which states lift at h=1). This will allow direct verification of the matches and the absence of redundancy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained; no circular reductions identified

full rationale

The paper introduces an original general procedure for dressing supergravitons with singletons to define the gravity-sector Hilbert space and its affine decomposition, explicitly extending (rather than relying upon) the low-level construction in the cited prior work. The explicit construction for the N=2 Sym^2(T^4) theory up to h=2, the direct spectral comparison to the independent CFT spectrum at the free orbifold point, and the observed lifting upon deformation are all computed within the new framework. The final identification with monotone/fortuitous spaces is labeled as a conjecture rather than a derived result. The self-citation serves only as background and does not bear the load of any central claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable beyond the standard AdS3/CFT2 setup; singletons are presented as known additional degrees of freedom associated with boundary diffeomorphisms from prior work.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5589 in / 1388 out tokens · 30734 ms · 2026-05-09T23:35:13.680140+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Fortuity and supergravity,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “Fortuity and Supergravity,”JHEP03(2026) 130, arXiv:2505.14888 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    The Large N Limit of Superconformal Field Theories and Supergravity

    J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,” Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,arXiv:hep-th/9711200

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,

    I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, “Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117no. 20, (2016) 201601,arXiv:1607.03908 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy,” Phys.Lett.B379(1996) 99–104,arXiv:hep-th/9601029 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  5. [5]

    Large N Elliptic Genus and AdS/CFT Correspondence

    J. de Boer, “Large N elliptic genus and AdS / CFT correspondence,”JHEP9905 (1999) 017,arXiv:hep-th/9812240 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    AdS3 Black Holes and a Stringy Exclusion Principle

    J. M. Maldacena and A. Strominger, “AdS(3) black holes and a stringy exclusion principle,”JHEP12(1998) 005,arXiv:hep-th/9804085

    work page Pith review arXiv 1998

  7. [7]

    Counting BPS Blackholes in Toroidal Type II String Theory

    J. M. Maldacena, G. W. Moore, and A. Strominger, “Counting BPS black holes in toroidal Type II string theory,”arXiv:hep-th/9903163

    work page Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    The Resolved Elliptic Genus and the D1-D5 CFT

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “The Resolved Elliptic Genus and the D1-D5 CFT,”arXiv:2603.18138 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  9. [9]

    Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, “Central Charges in the Canonical Realization of Asymptotic Symmetries: An Example from Three-Dimensional Gravity,”Commun. Math. Phys.104(1986) 207–226. 34

    1986

  10. [10]

    Words to describe a black hole,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Words to describe a black hole,”JHEP02(2023) 109, arXiv:2209.06728 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,” arXiv:2402.10129 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    1/16 BPS States in N=4 SYM

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, “1/16 BPS states inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory,”Phys. Rev. D88no. 10, (2013) 106005,arXiv:1305.6314 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  13. [13]

    The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park, “The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),” JHEP09(2024) 029,arXiv:2209.12696 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Finite N black hole cohomologies,

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee, “Finite N black hole cohomologies,”JHEP 12(2024) 029,arXiv:2312.16443 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,

    C.-M. Chang, L. Feng, Y.-H. Lin, and Y.-X. Tao, “Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,”SciPost Phys.16no. 4, (2024) 109, arXiv:2306.04673 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    Towards quantum black hole microstates,

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park, “Towards quantum black hole microstates,”JHEP11(2023) 175,arXiv:2304.10155 [hep-th]. [Erratum: JHEP 03, 091 (2025)]

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    Following Black Hole States,

    K. Budzik, H. Murali, and P. Vieira, “Following Black Hole States,” arXiv:2306.04693 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  18. [18]

    Fortuity in SYK models,

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang, “Fortuity in SYK models,”JHEP08 (2025) 003,arXiv:2412.06902 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang, “Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,” arXiv:2501.05448 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  20. [20]

    Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT,

    C.-M. Chang and H. Zhang, “Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT,” arXiv:2511.23294 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  21. [21]

    BPS phases and fortuity in higher spin holography,

    S. Kim, J. Lee, S. Lee, and H. Oh, “BPS phases and fortuity in higher spin holography,”arXiv:2511.03105 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  22. [22]

    Two roads to fortuity in ABJM theory,

    C. Behan and L. P. de Gioia, “Two roads to fortuity in ABJM theory,” arXiv:2512.23603 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Fortuity and relevant deformation,

    J. Choi and S. Kim, “Fortuity and relevant deformation,”arXiv:2512.12674 [hep-th]. 35

    work page arXiv

  24. [24]

    Fortuity in ABJM,

    A. Belin, P. Singh, R. Vadala, and A. Zaffaroni, “Fortuity in ABJM,” arXiv:2512.04146 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  25. [25]

    Fortuity with a single matrix,

    Y. Chen, “Fortuity with a single matrix,”arXiv:2511.00790 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  26. [26]

    An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju, “An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,”Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209–254, arXiv:hep-th/0510251

    work page arXiv 2007

  27. [27]

    Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations,

    L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla, “Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations,”JHEP05(2008) 049,arXiv:0803.4183 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2008

  28. [28]

    Snowmass White Paper: Micro- and Macro-Structure of Black Holes,

    I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur, and N. P. Warner, “Snowmass White Paper: Micro- and Macro-Structure of Black Holes,”arXiv:2203.04981 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  29. [29]

    Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory,

    I. Bena, E. J. Martinec, S. D. Mathur, and N. P. Warner, “Fuzzballs and Microstate Geometries: Black-Hole Structure in String Theory,”arXiv:2204.13113 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv

  30. [30]

    Superstrata,

    M. Shigemori, “Superstrata,”Gen. Rel. Grav.52no. 5, (2020) 51,arXiv:2002.01592 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  31. [31]

    S. G. Avery,Using the D1D5 CFT to Understand Black Holes. PhD thesis, The Ohio State University, 2010.arXiv:1012.0072 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  32. [32]

    Microscopic Formulation of Black Holes in String Theory

    J. R. David, G. Mandal, and S. R. Wadia, “Microscopic formulation of black holes in string theory,”Phys. Rept.369(2002) 549–686,arXiv:hep-th/0203048

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  33. [33]

    Proving the PP-Wave/CFT_2 Duality

    E. Gava and K. S. Narain, “Proving the PP wave / CFT(2) duality,”JHEP12(2002) 023,arXiv:hep-th/0208081

    work page Pith review arXiv 2002

  34. [34]

    Lifting of D1-D5-P states

    S. Hampton, S. D. Mathur, and I. G. Zadeh, “Lifting of D1-D5-P states,”JHEP01 (2019) 075,arXiv:1804.10097 [hep-th]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,

    B. Guo, M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur, and M. Mehta, “Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,”JHEP10(2022) 148,arXiv:2208.07409 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP11 (2020) 145,arXiv:2008.01274 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Lifting of states in 2-dimensionalN= 4 supersymmetric CFTs,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting of states in 2-dimensionalN= 4 supersymmetric CFTs,”JHEP10(2019) 155,arXiv:1905.11923 [hep-th]. 36

    work page arXiv 2019

  38. [38]

    Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar, and B. Nairz, “Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,”JHEP06(2024) 030,arXiv:2312.13288 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Perturbed symmetric-product orbifold: first-order mixing and puzzles for integrability,

    M. Fabri, A. Sfondrini, and T. Skrzypek, “Perturbed symmetric-product orbifold: first-order mixing and puzzles for integrability,”J. Phys. A59no. 1, (2026) 015201, arXiv:2504.13091 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  40. [40]

    Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4,

    N. Benjamin, C. A. Keller, and I. G. Zadeh, “Lifting 1/4-BPS states in AdS3 ×S 3 ×T 4,”JHEP10(2021) 089,arXiv:2107.00655 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 4, (2026) 046022,arXiv:2509.19425 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Fulton and J

    W. Fulton and J. Harris,Representation Theory: A First Course, vol. 129 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1991

    1991

  43. [43]

    Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP03 (2020) 028,arXiv:1912.05567 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions,

    A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, “Comments on the N=2, N=3, N=4 Superconformal Algebras in Two-Dimensions,”Phys.Lett.B184(1987) 191

    1987

  45. [45]

    The Regge limit of AdS 3 holographic correlators,

    S. Giusto, M. R. R. Hughes, and R. Russo, “The Regge limit of AdS 3 holographic correlators,”JHEP11(2020) 018,arXiv:2007.12118 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2020

  46. [46]

    Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,

    N. Ceplak, S. Giusto, M. R. R. Hughes, and R. Russo, “Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,”JHEP09(2021) 204,arXiv:2105.04670 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  47. [47]

    Two particle spectrum of tensor multiplets coupled to AdS3×S3 gravity,

    F. Aprile and M. Santagata, “Two particle spectrum of tensor multiplets coupled to AdS3×S3 gravity,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 12, (2021) 126022,arXiv:2104.00036 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Unmixing Supergravity,

    F. Aprile, J. M. Drummond, P. Heslop, and H. Paul, “Unmixing Supergravity,”JHEP 02(2018) 133,arXiv:1706.08456 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    Elliptic Genera of Symmetric Products and Second Quantized Strings

    R. Dijkgraaf, G. W. Moore, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Elliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings,”Commun. Math. Phys.185(1997) 197–209,arXiv:hep-th/9608096

    work page Pith review arXiv 1997

  50. [50]

    Characters of theN= 4 Superconformal Algebra With Two Central Extensions: 2. Massless Representations,

    J. L. Petersen and A. Taormina, “Characters of theN= 4 Superconformal Algebra With Two Central Extensions: 2. Massless Representations,”Nucl. Phys. B333(1990) 833–854. 37

    1990

  51. [51]

    Characters of theN= 4 Superconformal Algebra With Two Central Extensions,

    J. L. Petersen and A. Taormina, “Characters of theN= 4 Superconformal Algebra With Two Central Extensions,”Nucl. Phys. B331(1990) 556–572. 38

    1990