pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21096 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-22 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.CL

Recognition: unknown

Multilingual and Domain-Agnostic Tip-of-the-Tongue Query Generation for Simulated Evaluation

Bhaskar Mitra, Fernando Diaz, Jaime Arguello, Maik Fr\"obe, To Eun Kim, Xuhong He

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 22:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.CL
keywords tip-of-the-tongue retrievalmultilingual information retrievalquery generationLLM simulationbenchmark constructiontest collectioncross-language evaluationinformation retrieval evaluation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Language-aware choices in prompts and source documents are required to generate realistic tip-of-the-tongue queries in Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and English.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper builds an LLM-based method to simulate tip-of-the-tongue queries for four languages and multiple domains, then measures how well different prompt languages and source document languages produce queries that behave like those from real users. Fidelity is checked by seeing whether the same retrieval systems rank in the same order on the generated queries as on actual user queries. The experiments show that non-English sources are generally needed for strong results, while English Wikipedia can supply useful details when the primary sources fall short. The authors release the resulting test collections of 5,000 queries per language to support evaluation of multilingual retrieval systems.

Core claim

An LLM-based query simulation framework can produce tip-of-the-tongue queries whose retrieval behavior matches real user queries when prompt language and source document language are chosen to match the target language. Non-English sources prove important for fidelity in Chinese, Japanese, and Korean, while English Wikipedia helps when non-English sources lack sufficient information. System rank correlation serves as the validation metric, and the resulting collections are released for use in multilingual and domain-agnostic ToT evaluation.

What carries the argument

LLM-based ToT query generator that varies prompt language and source document language, with fidelity measured by correlation of system rankings against real user queries.

If this is right

  • Non-English source documents should be used when generating tip-of-the-tongue queries for Chinese, Japanese, or Korean.
  • English Wikipedia can be added as a supplementary source when non-English documents alone do not provide enough information.
  • The released collections of 5,000 queries per language enable direct comparison of retrieval systems on multilingual tip-of-the-tongue tasks.
  • Prompt and source language must be matched to the target language to achieve high fidelity in simulated queries.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same language-matching principle could be tested on additional languages once real tip-of-the-tongue query logs become available for validation.
  • The simulation approach might extend to other hard-to-satisfy query types, such as known-item searches, provided similar ranking-correlation checks are applied.
  • Future work could check whether queries that pass the ranking test also feel natural when read by native speakers of each language.

Load-bearing premise

That agreement in system rankings between simulated and real queries is enough to confirm that the simulated queries faithfully represent actual tip-of-the-tongue search behavior across languages and domains.

What would settle it

A new language or domain in which the top-ranked retrieval systems on the simulated queries differ markedly from those ranked highest on real user queries would show that the simulation has not captured the essential properties of real tip-of-the-tongue queries.

read the original abstract

Tip-of-the-Tongue (ToT) retrieval benchmarks have largely focused on English, limiting their applicability to multilingual information access. In this work, we construct multilingual ToT test collections for Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and English, using an LLM-based query simulation framework. We systematically study how prompt language and source document language affect the fidelity of simulated ToT queries, validating synthetic queries through system rank correlation against real user queries. Our results show that effective ToT simulation requires language-aware design choices: non-English language sources are generally important, while English Wikipedia can be beneficial when non-English sources provide insufficient information for query generation. Based on these findings, we release four ToT test collections with 5,000 queries per language across multiple domains. This work provides the first large-scale multilingual ToT benchmark and offers practical guidance for constructing realistic ToT datasets beyond English.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an LLM-based framework for simulating Tip-of-the-Tongue (ToT) queries in Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and English. It systematically varies prompt language and source document language, validates the resulting synthetic queries via system rank correlation against real user queries, concludes that effective multilingual ToT simulation requires language-aware choices (non-English sources generally important; English Wikipedia helpful when non-English sources are insufficient), and releases four new test collections of 5,000 queries each across multiple domains.

Significance. If the simulated queries are shown to faithfully replicate real ToT characteristics, the work would deliver the first large-scale multilingual ToT benchmarks and concrete design guidance for future simulations, addressing a clear gap in English-centric ToT evaluation. The public release of the four test collections is a concrete strength that supports reproducibility and further research in multilingual IR.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and validation description: the central claim that language-aware design choices produce effective ToT simulations rests on system rank correlation as the fidelity validator, yet no quantitative correlation values, error analysis, or discussion of LLM biases/domain gaps are provided. This metric can be satisfied by document-set overlap without replicating ToT traits such as partial recall, uncertainty, or language-specific phrasing, weakening support for the design-choice conclusions.
  2. [Results] Results and conclusions: the recommendation that non-English sources are generally required (while English Wikipedia helps when sources are insufficient) inherits any mismatch between rank correlation and actual query fidelity; cross-lingual differences in specificity, syntax, or cultural framing are not directly tested, so the language-aware guidance may not generalize beyond retrieval-performance similarity.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one concrete correlation value or range to illustrate the validation strength.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential value of the multilingual ToT benchmarks. We respond to each major comment below and describe the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and validation description: the central claim that language-aware design choices produce effective ToT simulations rests on system rank correlation as the fidelity validator, yet no quantitative correlation values, error analysis, or discussion of LLM biases/domain gaps are provided. This metric can be satisfied by document-set overlap without replicating ToT traits such as partial recall, uncertainty, or language-specific phrasing, weakening support for the design-choice conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by including quantitative rank correlation values. In the revised version we will report the key correlation figures (e.g., mean Kendall tau or Spearman rho across language configurations) directly in the abstract. We will also expand the validation section with a brief error analysis of divergent cases and a discussion of LLM biases and domain gaps. While we acknowledge that rank correlation is a proxy that does not directly measure traits such as partial recall or uncertainty, it was chosen because it evaluates the queries' functional impact on retrieval performance—the primary purpose of the benchmarks. We will clarify this rationale and its limitations in the revised text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results and conclusions: the recommendation that non-English sources are generally required (while English Wikipedia helps when sources are insufficient) inherits any mismatch between rank correlation and actual query fidelity; cross-lingual differences in specificity, syntax, or cultural framing are not directly tested, so the language-aware guidance may not generalize beyond retrieval-performance similarity.

    Authors: We accept that our language-aware recommendations are tied to the rank-correlation metric and therefore reflect retrieval similarity rather than all possible dimensions of query fidelity. In the revision we will add an explicit limitations paragraph noting that cross-lingual differences in specificity, syntax, and cultural framing were not directly tested via human evaluation or trait-specific annotation. The guidance is presented as an empirical observation from our experiments rather than a universal claim; we will emphasize this scope in the results and conclusion sections. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; validation uses independent external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims about language-aware design choices for multilingual ToT query simulation from empirical system-rank correlations computed against separate real-user query collections. These real queries serve as an external benchmark independent of the LLM prompt construction process and the simulated query generation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations reduce the reported results to the inputs by construction; the derivation chain remains self-contained against the external validation data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the empirical premise that LLM-generated queries can approximate real ToT behavior when language-aware sources are used; no new mathematical free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5461 in / 1145 out tokens · 53733 ms · 2026-05-09T22:56:00.057076+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Jaime Arguello, Samarth Bhargav, Fernando Diaz, Evangelos Kanoulas, and Bhaskar Mitra. 2023. Overview of the TREC 2023 Tip-of-the-Tongue Track. InThe Thirty-Second Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2023). https: //trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec32/papers/Overview_tot.pdf

    2023

  2. [2]

    Jaime Arguello, Samarth Bhargav, Fernando Diaz, To Eun Kim, Yifan He, Evange- los Kanoulas, and Bhaskar Mitra. 2024. Overview of the TREC 2024 Tip-of-the- Tongue Track. InThe Thirty-Third Text REtrieval Conference Proceedings (TREC 2024). https://trec.nist.gov/pubs/trec33/papers/Overview_tot.pdf

    2024

  3. [3]

    Jaime Arguello, Fernando Diaz, Maik Fröebe, To Eun Kim, and Bhaskar Mitra

  4. [4]

    Overview of the TREC 2025 Tip-of-the-Tongue track.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.20671(2026)

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Jaime Arguello, Adam Ferguson, Emery Fine, Bhaskar Mitra, Hamed Zamani, and Fernando Diaz. 2021. Tip of the Tongue Known-Item Retrieval: A Case Study in Movie Identification. InProceedings of the 2021 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, 5–14. doi:10.1145/3406522.3446021

    work page doi:10.1145/3406522.3446021 2021

  6. [6]

    Larissa Aronin and Muiris Ó Laoire. 2004. Exploring Multilingualism in Cultural. Trilingualism in family, school, and community43 (2004), 11

    2004

  7. [7]

    Leif Azzopardi, Maarten de Rijke, and Krisztian Balog. 2007. Building simulated queries for known-item topics: an analysis using six european languages. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Amsterdam, The Netherlands)(SIGIR ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, 455–4...

    work page doi:10.1145/1277741.1277820 2007

  8. [8]

    Krisztian Balog, Leif Azzopardi, Jaap Kamps, and Maarten De Rijke. 2006. Overview of webclef 2006. InWorkshop of the Cross-Language Evaluation Forum for European Languages. Springer, 803–819

    2006

  9. [9]

    Samarth Bhargav, Anne Schuth, and Claudia Hauff. 2023. When the Music Stops: Tip-of-the-Tongue Retrieval for Music. InProceedings of the 46th In- ternational ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Informa- tion Retrieval (SIGIR ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, 2506–2510. doi:10.1145/3539618.3592086

    work page doi:10.1145/3539618.3592086 2023

  10. [10]

    Samarth Bhargav, Georgios Sidiropoulos, and Evangelos Kanoulas. 2022. ’It’s on the tip of my tongue’: A new Dataset for Known-Item Retrieval. InProceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (Virtual Event, AZ, USA)(WSDM ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, 48–56. doi:10.1145/3488560.3498421

    work page doi:10.1145/3488560.3498421 2022

  11. [11]

    Shaily Bhatt and Fernando Diaz. 2024. Extrinsic Evaluation of Cultural Compe- tence in Large Language Models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2024. Association for Computational Linguistics, 16055–16074. doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.942

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2024.findings-emnlp.942 2024

  12. [12]

    Toine Bogers, Maria Gäde, Mark Hall, Marijn Koolen, Vivien Petras, and Mette Skov. 2025. Exploring the Zero-Shot Known-Item Retrieval Capabilities of LLMs for Casual Leisure Information Needs. InCHIIR 2025: Proceedings of the 2025 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval

    2025

  13. [13]

    Hall, Marijn Koolen, Vivien Petras, and Mette Skov

    Toine Bogers, Maria Gäde, Mark M. Hall, Marijn Koolen, Vivien Petras, and Mette Skov. 2026. Tip-of-the-Tongue Search in the Wild: Analyzing Human and LLM Performance and Success Factors on Complex Search Requests. InProceedings of the 2026 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval, CHIIR 2026, Seattle, W A, USA, March 22-26, 2026. ACM, 162...

    work page doi:10.1145/3786304.3787864 2026

  14. [14]

    Ben Carterette. 2009. On rank correlation and the distance between rankings. InProceedings of the 32nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Boston, MA, USA)(SIGIR ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 436–443. doi:10.1145/1571941. 1572017

    work page doi:10.1145/1571941 2009

  15. [15]

    Sky CH-Wang, Darshan Deshpande, Smaranda Muresan, Anand Kannappan, and Rebecca Qian. 2025. Browsing Lost Unformed Recollections: A Benchmark for Tip-of-the-Tongue Search and Reasoning.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.19193(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Shane Culpepper, Fernando Diaz, and Mark D

    J. Shane Culpepper, Fernando Diaz, and Mark D. Smucker. 2018. Research Fron- tiers in Information Retrieval: Report from the Third Strategic Workshop on Information Retrieval in Lorne (SWIRL 2018).SIGIR Forum52, 1 (Aug. 2018), 34–90. doi:10.1145/3274784.3274788

    work page doi:10.1145/3274784.3274788 2018

  17. [17]

    Losada, José C

    David Elsweiler, David E. Losada, José C. Toucedo, and Ronald T. Fernandez. 2011. Seeding simulated queries with user-study data for personal search evaluation. InProceedings of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Beijing, China)(SIGIR ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, 25–34. doi:10.114...

    work page doi:10.1145/2009916.2009924 2011

  18. [18]

    David Elsweiler, Ian Ruthven, and Christopher Jones. 2007. Towards memory supporting personal information management tools.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology58, 7 (2007), 924–946

    2007

  19. [19]

    David Elsweiler, Max L Wilson, and Brian Kirkegaard Lunn. 2011. Understanding casual-leisure information behaviour. InNew directions in information behaviour. Vol. 1. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 211–241

    2011

  20. [20]

    Kenneth Enevoldsen, Isaac Chung, Imene Kerboua, Márton Kardos, Ashwin Mathur, David Stap, Jay Gala, Wissam Siblini, Dominik Krzemiński, Genta In- dra Winata, Saba Sturua, Saiteja Utpala, Mathieu Ciancone, Marion Schaeffer, Diganta Misra, Shreeya Dhakal, Jonathan Rystrøm, Roman Solomatin, Ömer Vey- sel Çağatan, Akash Kundu, Martin Bernstorff, Shitao Xiao, ...

    2025

  21. [21]

    Maik Fröbe, Eric Oliver Schmidt, and Matthias Hagen. 2023. A Large-Scale Dataset for Known-Item Question Performance Prediction.. InQPP++@ ECIR. 13–19

    2023

  22. [22]

    Yifan He, To Eun Kim, Fernando Diaz, Jaime Arguello, and Bhaskar Mitra. 2025. Tip of the Tongue Query Elicitation for Simulated Evaluation. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Padua, Italy)(SIGIR ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3398–3407. doi:10.114...

    work page doi:10.1145/3726302.3730335 2025

  23. [23]

    Gautier Izacard, Mathilde Caron, Lucas Hosseini, Sebastian Riedel, Piotr Bo- janowski, Armand Joulin, and Edouard Grave. 2022. Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning. arXiv:2112.09118 [cs.IR] https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.09118

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Kinda like The Sims... But with ghosts?

    Ida Kathrine Hammeleff Jørgensen and Toine Bogers. 2020. “Kinda like The Sims... But with ghosts?”: A Qualitative Analysis of Video Game Re-finding Requests on Reddit. InProceedings of the 15th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, Article 40, 4 pages. doi:10.1145/3402942.3402971

    work page doi:10.1145/3402942.3402971 2020

  25. [25]

    Julian Killingback and Hamed Zamani. 2025. Benchmarking Information Retrieval Models on Complex Retrieval Tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.07253(2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Bruce Croft

    Jinyoung Kim and W. Bruce Croft. 2009. Retrieval experiments using pseudo- desktop collections. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, 1297–1306. doi:10.1145/1645953.1646117

    work page doi:10.1145/1645953.1646117 2009

  27. [27]

    Dawn Lawrie, Sean MacAvaney, James Mayfield, Luca Soldaini, Eugene Yang, and Andrew Yates. 2026. WSDM CUP 2026: Multilingual Retrieval. InProceedings of the Nineteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (USA)(WSDM ’26). Association for Computing Machinery, 1394–1395. doi:10. 1145/3773966.3778021

    work page arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Kevin Lin, Kyle Lo, Joseph Gonzalez, and Dan Klein. 2023. Decomposing Complex Queries for Tip-of-the-tongue Retrieval. InFindings of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023. Association for Computational Linguistics, 5521–5533. doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.367

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.367 2023

  29. [29]

    Florian Meier, Toine Bogers, Maria Gäde, and Line Ebdrup Thomsen. 2021. To- wards Understanding Complex Known-Item Requests on Reddit. InProceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, 143–154. doi:10.1145/3465336.3475096

    work page doi:10.1145/3465336.3475096 2021

  30. [30]

    Niklas Muennighoff, Nouamane Tazi, Loic Magne, and Nils Reimers. 2023. MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmark. InProceedings of the 17th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, Dubrovnik, Croatia, 2014–2037. doi:10.18653/v1/ 2023.eacl-main.148

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/ 2023

  31. [31]

    Ricardo Rei, José Pombal, Nuno M Guerreiro, João Alves, Pedro Henrique Martins, Patrick Fernandes, Helena Wu, Tania Vaz, Duarte Alves, Amin Farajian, et al

  32. [32]

    In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Machine Translation

    Tower v2: Unbabel-IST 2024 submission for the general MT shared task. In Proceedings of the Ninth Conference on Machine Translation. 185–204

    2024

  33. [33]

    Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Association for Computational Linguistics. http://arxiv.org/abs/1908.10084

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019

  34. [34]

    S. E. Robertson and S. Walker. 1994. Some simple effective approximations to the 2-Poisson model for probabilistic weighted retrieval. InProceedings of the 17th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(Dublin, Ireland)(SIGIR ’94). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 232–241

    1994

  35. [35]

    Yinfei Yang, Daniel Cer, Amin Ahmad, Mandy Guo, Jax Law, Noah Constant, Gustavo Hernandez Abrego, Steve Yuan, Chris Tar, Yun-Hsuan Sung, Brian Strope, and Ray Kurzweil. 2019. Multilingual Universal Sentence Encoder for Semantic Retrieval. arXiv:1907.04307 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.04307

    work page arXiv 2019

  36. [36]

    Chengxiang Zhai and John Lafferty. 2001. A study of smoothing methods for language models applied to Ad Hoc information retrieval. InProceedings of the 24th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval(New Orleans, Louisiana, USA)(SIGIR ’01). Association for Computing Machinery, 334–342. doi:10.1145/383952.384019

    work page doi:10.1145/383952.384019 2001