pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.21968 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-23 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.HE· astro-ph.SR· nucl-th

Recognition: unknown

Gradient-Produced Neutrinos

Erwin H. Tanin , Yikun Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 21:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRnucl-th
keywords neutrino pair productionneutron starsdensity gradientsSchwinger effectdense QCDastrophysical neutrinoscompact objects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Steep matter-density gradients produce neutrino-antineutrino pairs analogously to the Schwinger effect.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that sufficiently steep gradients in matter density can create neutrino and antineutrino pairs, in a process parallel to how intense electric fields produce electron-positron pairs. This mechanism is expected to operate inside neutron stars, where rapid density changes occur. A reader would care because it identifies a new source of neutrinos that operates independently of ordinary weak-interaction processes. The resulting neutrinos could carry direct information about conditions deep inside neutron stars and about the behavior of matter at the highest achievable densities. The authors outline possible detection signatures and their potential to constrain neutron-star models and high-density quantum chromodynamics.

Core claim

Sufficiently strong electric fields can produce charged-particle pairs via the Schwinger effect. We argue that steep matter-density gradients, as can arise in neutron star interiors, would analogously produce neutrino-antineutrino pairs. We then discuss observational signatures of these gradient-produced (anti)neutrinos and how they could provide new probes of neutron-star structure and baryon-dense QCD.

What carries the argument

The Schwinger-like pair-production mechanism applied to neutrinos in the presence of matter-density gradients.

If this is right

  • Gradient-produced neutrinos would exhibit observable signatures distinct from those of conventional weak processes in neutron stars.
  • Detection of these neutrinos would furnish new constraints on the internal density structure of neutron stars.
  • The mechanism supplies an additional channel for testing models of baryon-dense quantum chromodynamics.
  • The process may contribute measurably to the total neutrino output from compact objects.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous production could occur wherever steep density gradients exist, such as in the early universe or during neutron-star mergers.
  • Isolating the gradient contribution would require subtracting known neutrino backgrounds from other astrophysical sources.
  • Laboratory analogs in condensed-matter systems with engineered density profiles might allow controlled tests of the rate.

Load-bearing premise

The pair-production process known from strong electric fields applies directly to neutrinos acted on by density gradients and yields a rate that is not suppressed to unobservably small values.

What would settle it

A measured neutrino flux or energy spectrum from a neutron star whose density profile is independently constrained that either matches the predicted gradient-induced rate or shows no excess above standard production channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.21968 by Erwin H. Tanin, Yikun Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Pair-production rate per unit area ˙n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Illustration of pair production of bound neutrinos by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. NS cooling curves: surface temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Sufficiently strong electric fields can produce charged-particle pairs via the Schwinger effect. We argue that steep matter-density gradients, as can arise in neutron star interiors, would analogously produce neutrino-antineutrino pairs. We then discuss observational signatures of these gradient-produced (anti)neutrinos and how they could provide new probes of neutron-star structure and baryon-dense QCD.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript argues that sufficiently strong electric fields produce charged particle pairs via the Schwinger effect, and that steep matter-density gradients (as in neutron star interiors) would analogously produce neutrino-antineutrino pairs via a similar non-perturbative mechanism. It then discusses potential observational signatures of these gradient-produced neutrinos as new probes of neutron-star structure and baryon-dense QCD.

Significance. If the analogy holds with a non-negligible, calculable production rate, the result would open a novel channel for neutrino emission from compact objects and could constrain density profiles or QCD phases in neutron stars. The paper identifies an interesting conceptual link between strong-field QED and neutrino physics in dense matter, but its significance is currently limited by the absence of an explicit rate calculation.

major comments (2)
  1. [mechanism section / analogy to Schwinger effect] The central analogy (introduction and mechanism discussion): the Schwinger effect arises from minimal coupling of charged fields to a U(1) gauge field, leading to vacuum instability and a non-zero imaginary part of the effective action (or non-trivial Bogoliubov coefficients) in a constant electric field. Here the neutrino background is a static, chiral forward-scattering potential V(r) = sqrt(2) G_F n_b(r) added to the Weyl/Dirac Hamiltonian with no gauge field present. The manuscript does not derive the corresponding pair-production rate or demonstrate that the vacuum is unstable, so it remains possible that the rate is identically zero or perturbatively suppressed by the dimension-6 weak interaction.
  2. [observational signatures section] Rate estimate and observability discussion: without an explicit formula for the production rate (e.g., exponential suppression factor in terms of the density gradient scale length or an integral over the effective potential), it is impossible to assess whether the effect is observable against standard neutrino production channels in neutron stars or suppressed to irrelevance.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract / introduction] The abstract and introduction use the term 'gradient-produced (anti)neutrinos' without a brief definition or contrast to standard production mechanisms; adding one sentence of clarification would improve readability.
  2. [mechanism discussion] A reference to the original Schwinger 1951 paper and to modern reviews of the Schwinger effect in inhomogeneous fields would strengthen the analogy section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The report correctly notes that the current version presents the conceptual analogy without an explicit rate calculation, limiting quantitative assessment of the mechanism and its observability. We will revise the manuscript to address these points by adding a derivation of the pair-production rate and an order-of-magnitude estimate. Our responses to the major comments are as follows.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [mechanism section / analogy to Schwinger effect] The central analogy (introduction and mechanism discussion): the Schwinger effect arises from minimal coupling of charged fields to a U(1) gauge field, leading to vacuum instability and a non-zero imaginary part of the effective action (or non-trivial Bogoliubov coefficients) in a constant electric field. Here the neutrino background is a static, chiral forward-scattering potential V(r) = sqrt(2) G_F n_b(r) added to the Weyl/Dirac Hamiltonian with no gauge field present. The manuscript does not derive the corresponding pair-production rate or demonstrate that the vacuum is unstable, so it remains possible that the rate is identically zero or perturbatively suppressed by the dimension-6 weak interaction.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript does not contain an explicit derivation of the pair-production rate or a demonstration of vacuum instability. The analogy is motivated by the structure of the effective Hamiltonian, in which the forward-scattering potential V(r) enters the Weyl equation in a manner that can induce mode mixing for sufficiently steep gradients, analogous to the role of the electric field in the Schwinger mechanism. However, confirming a non-zero rate requires computing the Bogoliubov coefficients or the imaginary part of the effective action for the spatially varying potential. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated section performing this calculation for a model density profile (e.g., a tanh-like transition), showing that the rate is non-vanishing and carries an exponential suppression set by the gradient scale length, while remaining perturbatively small in G_F. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [observational signatures section] Rate estimate and observability discussion: without an explicit formula for the production rate (e.g., exponential suppression factor in terms of the density gradient scale length or an integral over the effective potential), it is impossible to assess whether the effect is observable against standard neutrino production channels in neutron stars or suppressed to irrelevance.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the present discussion of observational signatures is qualitative precisely because no explicit rate formula is provided. The revised version will include the derived production-rate expression together with a numerical estimate for representative neutron-star density gradients. This estimate will be compared with standard channels such as the modified Urca process to indicate the parameter regimes in which gradient-produced neutrinos could be competitive or serve as a diagnostic of the density profile and possible QCD phases. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; proposal is an explicit analogy without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The manuscript advances a hypothesis that steep baryon-density gradients induce neutrino-antineutrino pair production by direct analogy to the Schwinger mechanism. No derivation chain is presented that reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter, a self-citation, or a redefinition of the input. The abstract and available text frame the result as an argument to be explored rather than a closed computation whose output is forced by construction. External benchmarks (explicit Bogoliubov-coefficient calculation or imaginary-part effective action) are acknowledged as missing, but their absence does not create circularity within the paper itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the full ledger cannot be extracted; the central claim rests on an unstated assumption that the Schwinger mechanism generalizes to density gradients for neutrinos.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Schwinger pair-production mechanism applies analogously to matter-density gradients for neutrinos
    Invoked in the abstract as the basis for the production claim

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5349 in / 1134 out tokens · 47156 ms · 2026-05-09T21:16:10.841978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

177 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Sauter, Zeitschrift fur Physik69, 742 (1931)

    F. Sauter, Zeitschrift fur Physik69, 742 (1931)

    1931

  2. [2]

    J. S. Schwinger, Phys. Rev.82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  3. [3]

    A. I. Nikishov, Soviet Journal of Experimental and The- oretical Physics30, 660 (1969)

    1969

  4. [4]

    Schneider and R

    C. Schneider and R. Sch¨ utzhold, JHEP02, 164 (2016), arXiv:1407.3584 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Gelis and N

    F. Gelis and N. Tanji, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.87, 1 (2016), arXiv:1510.05451 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2016

  6. [6]

    I. A. Aleksandrov, G. Plunien, and V. M. Shabaev, Phys. Rev. D94, 065024 (2016), arXiv:1606.06313 [hep- th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  7. [7]

    S. P. Gavrilov and D. M. Gitman, Phys. Rev. D53, 7162 (1996), arXiv:hep-th/9603152

    work page arXiv 1996

  8. [8]

    M. Ruf, G. R. Mocken, C. Muller, K. Z. Hatsagortsyan, and C. H. Keitel, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 080402 (2009), arXiv:0810.4047 [physics.atom-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Fedotov, A

    A. Fedotov, A. Ilderton, F. Karbstein, B. King, D. Seipt, H. Taya, and G. Torgrimsson, Phys. Rept.1010, 1 (2023), arXiv:2203.00019 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    A scalarϕinteracting with a fermionψvia Yukawa in- teraction of the formϕ ¯ψψ, for example, does not meet the conditions, since a background scalar gradient∇ϕ exerts the same force onψand its antiparticle and there- fore does not separate them

  11. [11]

    A systematic exploration of vac- uum pair-production and its connection to beyond the Standard Model scenarios is postponed for future work [88]

    We expect, however, that the underlying mechanism is broader and can be extended to other classes of back- grounds and couplings. A systematic exploration of vac- uum pair-production and its connection to beyond the Standard Model scenarios is postponed for future work [88]

  12. [12]

    The phase diagram of dense QCD

    K. Fukushima and T. Hatsuda, Rept. Prog. Phys.74, 014001 (2011), arXiv:1005.4814 [hep-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2011

  13. [13]

    Rajagopal, Nucl

    K. Rajagopal, Nucl. Phys. A661, 150 (1999), arXiv:hep-ph/9908360

    work page arXiv 1999

  14. [14]

    G. Baym, T. Hatsuda, T. Kojo, P. D. Powell, Y. Song, and T. Takatsuka, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 056902 (2018), arXiv:1707.04966 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    D. E. Alvarez-Castillo and D. B. Blaschke, Phys. Rev. C96, 045809 (2017), arXiv:1703.02681 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Chamel and P

    N. Chamel and P. Haensel, Living Rev. Rel.11, 10 (2008), arXiv:0812.3955 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  17. [17]

    N. K. Glendenning, Phys. Rev. D46, 1274 (1992)

    1992

  18. [18]

    Hempel, G

    M. Hempel, G. Pagliara, and J. Schaffner-Bielich, Phys. Rev. D80, 125014 (2009), arXiv:0907.2680 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2009

  19. [19]

    Belvedere, D

    R. Belvedere, D. Pugliese, J. A. Rueda, R. Ruffini, and S.-S. Xue, Nucl. Phys. A883, 1 (2012), arXiv:1202.6500 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2012

  20. [20]

    [52, 53, 92, 93]

    Neutrino pair-production by matter-potential gradients in NS was previously studied in Refs. [52, 53, 92, 93]. Those works considered typical NS density gradients with characteristic length scalesn n/|∇nn| ∼10 km and concluded that gradient-produced neutrinos have no dis- cernible effects on an NS. Unlike these earlier works, we consider NS interiors with...

  21. [21]

    Nagata, Finite-density lattice QCD and sign prob- lem: current status and open problems, Prog

    K. Nagata, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.127, 103991 (2022), arXiv:2108.12423 [hep-lat]

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Nikishov, Sov

    A. Nikishov, Sov. Phys. JETP30, 660 (1970)

    1970

  23. [23]

    D. M. Gitman, J. Phys. A10, 2007 (1977)

    2007

  24. [24]

    Soffel, B

    M. Soffel, B. Muller, and W. Greiner, Phys. Rept.85, 51 (1982)

    1982

  25. [25]

    Ambjorn and R

    J. Ambjorn and R. J. Hughes, Annals Phys.145, 340 (1983)

    1983

  26. [26]

    Tanji, Annals Phys.324, 1691 (2009), arXiv:0810.4429 [hep-ph]

    N. Tanji, Annals Phys.324, 1691 (2009), arXiv:0810.4429 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    Chervyakov and H

    A. Chervyakov and H. Kleinert, Phys. Rev. D80, 065010 (2009), arXiv:0906.1422 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2009

  28. [28]

    Chervyakov and H

    A. Chervyakov and H. Kleinert, Phys. Part. Nucl.49, 374 (2018), arXiv:1112.4120 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2018

  29. [29]

    For|z|≳l, the tanh gradient asymptotes to zero

    With a tanh/Sauter potential, the pair production oc- curs mainly within the spatial region−l≲z≲l, where the potential gradient is sizable and approximately uni- form. For|z|≳l, the tanh gradient asymptotes to zero. Thus the production rate per volume can be estimated from the production rate per area as ˙n≈˙n ⊥/(2l)

  30. [30]

    Sauter, Z

    F. Sauter, Z. Phys69, 742 (1931)

    1931

  31. [31]

    Heisenberg and H

    W. Heisenberg and H. Euler, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik98, 714 (1936)

    1936

  32. [32]

    Schwinger, Physical Review82, 664 (1951)

    J. Schwinger, Physical Review82, 664 (1951)

    1951

  33. [33]

    [94–96], whose leading-order rates are pro- portional to the particle’s mass squared

    We note that our pair-production rates differ from those of,e.g., Refs. [94–96], whose leading-order rates are pro- portional to the particle’s mass squared. The difference lies in the backgrounds assumed: static & inhomoge- neous in our case and dynamical & homogeneous in theirs

  34. [34]

    S1, S2, and S6, we pro- vide derivations of the production rate neglecting the chiral mixing while keeping the mass dependence in each chiral sector

    In Supplementary Material Sec. S1, S2, and S6, we pro- vide derivations of the production rate neglecting the chiral mixing while keeping the mass dependence in each chiral sector. The result reproduces the exponen- tial suppression behavior in the gradual limit, although the chiral mixing would introduce important corrections as it becomes relevant for s...

  35. [35]

    Wolfenstein, Phys

    L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. D17, 2369 (1978)

    1978

  36. [36]

    N¨ otzold and G

    D. N¨ otzold and G. Raffelt, Nucl. Phys. B307, 924 (1988)

    1988

  37. [37]

    Page and S

    D. Page and S. Reddy, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.56, 327 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0608360

    work page arXiv 2006

  38. [38]

    M. G. Alford, S. Han, and M. Prakash, Phys. Rev. D 88, 083013 (2013), arXiv:1302.4732 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2013

  39. [39]

    Annala, T

    E. Annala, T. Gorda, A. Kurkela, J. N¨ attil¨ a, and A. Vuorinen, Nature Phys.16, 907 (2020), arXiv:1903.09121 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  40. [40]

    Lugones and A

    G. Lugones and A. G. Grunfeld, Universe7, 493 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Buballa, NJL model analysis of quark matter at large density, Phys

    M. Buballa, Phys. Rept.407, 205 (2005), arXiv:hep- ph/0402234

    work page arXiv 2005

  42. [42]

    J. P. Pereira, C. V. Flores, and G. Lugones, Astrophys. J.860, 12 (2018), arXiv:1706.09371 [gr-qc]

    work page arXiv 2018

  43. [43]

    Tonetto and G

    L. Tonetto and G. Lugones, Phys. Rev. D101, 123029 (2020), arXiv:2003.01259 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  44. [44]

    Han and A

    S. Han and A. W. Steiner, Phys. Rev. D99, 083014 (2019), arXiv:1810.10967 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    Benic, D

    S. Benic, D. Blaschke, D. E. Alvarez-Castillo, T. Fis- cher, and S. Typel, Astron. Astrophys.577, A40 (2015), arXiv:1411.2856 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2015

  46. [46]

    Alvarez-Castillo, S

    D. Alvarez-Castillo, S. Benic, D. Blaschke, S. Han, and S. Typel, European Physical Journal A52, 232 (2016). 8

    2016

  47. [47]

    I. F. Ranea-Sandoval, S. Han, M. G. Orsaria, G. A. Contrera, F. Weber, and M. G. Alford, Phys. Rev. C 93, 045812 (2016), arXiv:1512.09183 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    E. H. Gudmundsson, C. J. Pethick, and R. I. Epstein, ApJ259, L19 (1982)

    1982

  49. [49]

    E. H. Gudmundsson, C. J. Pethick, and R. I. Epstein, ApJ272, 286 (1983)

    1983

  50. [50]

    D. G. Yakovlev and C. J. Pethick, Ann. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.42, 169 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0402143

    work page arXiv 2004

  51. [51]

    For simplicity, we conserva- tively neglect this contribution

    Neutrino-antineutrino pair creation can also be stimu- lated by neutrinos(antineutrinos) approaching the jump interface from the inside(outside), a process responsible for the Klein paradox [97]. For simplicity, we conserva- tively neglect this contribution. When the bound neu- trinos are degenerate, we expect this contribution to be O(1) of the spontaneo...

  52. [52]

    Loeb, Phys

    A. Loeb, Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 115 (1990)

    1990

  53. [53]

    Kachelriess, Phys

    M. Kachelriess, Phys. Lett. B426, 89 (1998), arXiv:hep- ph/9712363

    work page arXiv 1998

  54. [54]

    (9), bound neutrino states would fill in aboutN deg ν / ˙N grad ν ∼1 day

    At the rate in Eq. (9), bound neutrino states would fill in aboutN deg ν / ˙N grad ν ∼1 day. Since the total mass of the degenerate neutrinos∼∆V N deg ν ∼10 kg≪M ⊙ is tiny, they backreact negligibly to the NS

  55. [55]

    J. L. Zdunik and P. Haensel, Astron. Astrophys.551, A61 (2013), arXiv:1211.1231 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2013

  56. [56]

    Lastowiecki, D

    R. Lastowiecki, D. Blaschke, H. Grigorian, and S. Typel, Acta Phys. Polon. Supp.5, 535 (2012), arXiv:1112.6430 [nucl-th]

    work page arXiv 2012

  57. [57]

    Alford, M

    M. Alford, M. Braby, M. W. Paris, and S. Reddy, As- trophys. J.629, 969 (2005), arXiv:nucl-th/0411016

    work page arXiv 2005

  58. [58]

    A. Y. Potekhin, D. A. Zyuzin, D. G. Yakovlev, M. V. Beznogov, and Y. A. Shibanov, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.496, 5052 (2020), arXiv:2006.15004 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  59. [59]

    Yanagi, N

    K. Yanagi, N. Nagata, and K. Hamaguchi, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.492, 5508 (2020), arXiv:1904.04667 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2020

  60. [60]

    Iwamoto, Annals of Physics141, 1 (1982)

    N. Iwamoto, Annals of Physics141, 1 (1982)

    1982

  61. [61]

    Reisenegger, Astrophys

    A. Reisenegger, Astrophys. J.442, 749 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9410035

    work page arXiv 1995

  62. [62]

    P., & Yakovlev, D

    P. Haensel, K. P. Levenfish, and D. G. Yakovlev, A&A 357, 1157 (2000), arXiv:astro-ph/0004183 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2000

  63. [63]

    The chemical potentialµand densitynof an asymmet- ric species are related approximately asµ∼n 1/3

  64. [64]

    D. Page, J. M. Lattimer, M. Prakash, and A. W. Steiner, Astrophys. J. Suppl.155, 623 (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0403657

    work page arXiv 2004

  65. [65]

    For clarity, we neglect general-relativistic redshift fac- tors, which only change luminosities byO(10%)

  66. [66]

    Reisenegger, Astrophys

    A. Reisenegger, Astrophys. J.485, 313 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9612179

    work page arXiv 1997

  67. [67]

    Fernandez and A

    R. Fernandez and A. Reisenegger, Astrophys. J.625, 291 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0502116

    work page arXiv 2005

  68. [68]

    Baryakhtar, J

    M. Baryakhtar, J. Bramante, S. W. Li, T. Linden, and N. Raj, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 131801 (2017), arXiv:1704.01577 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    Joglekar, N

    A. Joglekar, N. Raj, P. Tanedo, and H.-B. Yu, Phys. Rev. D102, 123002 (2020), arXiv:2004.09539 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    J. F. Acevedo, J. Bramante, R. K. Leane, and N. Raj, JCAP03, 038 (2020), arXiv:1911.06334 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  71. [71]

    Chatterjee, R

    S. Chatterjee, R. Garani, R. K. Jain, B. Kanodia, M. S. N. Kumar, and S. K. Vempati, Phys. Rev. D 108, L021301 (2023), arXiv:2205.05048 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  72. [72]

    Bramante, K

    J. Bramante, K. Mack, N. Raj, L. Shao, and N. Tyagi, JCAP12, 051 (2025), arXiv:2411.18647 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  73. [73]

    Petrovich and A

    C. Petrovich and A. Reisenegger, A&A521, A77 (2010), arXiv:0912.2564 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2010

  74. [74]

    Wijnands, (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405089

    R. Wijnands, (2004), arXiv:astro-ph/0405089

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004

  75. [75]

    Wijnands, N

    R. Wijnands, N. Degenaar, and D. Page, J. Astrophys. Astron.38, 49 (2017), arXiv:1709.07034 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    P. S. Shternin, D. G. Yakovlev, P. Haensel, and A. Y. Potekhin, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.382, 43 (2007), arXiv:0708.0086 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2007

  77. [77]

    E. F. Brown and A. Cumming, ApJ698, 1020 (2009), arXiv:0901.3115 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2009

  78. [78]

    R. E. Rutledge, L. Bildsten, E. F. Brown, G. G. Pavlov, V. E. Zavlin, and G. Ushomirsky, Astrophys. J.580, 413 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0108125

    work page arXiv 2002

  79. [79]

    Vigan` o, N

    D. Vigan` o, N. Rea, J. A. Pons, R. Perna, D. N. Aguilera, and J. A. Miralles, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.434, 123 (2013), arXiv:1306.2156 [astro-ph.SR]

    work page arXiv 2013

  80. [80]

    J. A. Pons, J. A. Miralles, and U. Geppert, Astron. Astrophys.496, 207 (2009), arXiv:0812.3018 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2009

Showing first 80 references.