arxiv: 2604.22743 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

Thermometry for a Kagome Lattice Dipolar Rydberg Simulator

Bj\"orn Sbierski, Erik Fitzner, Igor Lesanovsky

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 09:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.str-el

keywords Rydberg atomsKagome latticethermometryquantum spin liquiddipolar spin modelspin correlationshigh temperature expansion

0 comments

The pith

A thermometry method combining correlations and high-temperature expansion determines the temperature of a Rydberg Kagome lattice simulator to be 0.55J.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a thermometry technique for Rydberg atom arrays that integrates measured spin correlations and local magnetic susceptibilities with a theoretical high-temperature expansion of dynamic spin correlations. When applied to experimental data from a simulation of the anti-ferromagnetic dipolar XY model on the Kagome lattice, this method gives a temperature of 0.55 times the coupling strength J and an entropy per particle of 0.67 times the natural log of 2. This result indicates that the current experimental temperature is too high to access the quantum spin liquid phase that the model is expected to host at lower temperatures. Accurate thermometry is crucial for validating quantum simulators and identifying what improvements are needed to reach desired regimes.

Core claim

We propose an accurate thermometry approach for Rydberg atom tweezer arrays combining data from correlation and local susceptibility measurements with a theoretical high-temperature expansion method for dynamic spin correlations. We apply our approach to a recent quantum simulation experiment realizing an anti-ferromagnetic dipolar spin-1/2 XY model on the Kagome lattice. We obtain T=0.55J and S/N=0.67 ln2 for temperature and entropy respectively, showing that further experimental efforts are required to reach the putative quantum spin liquid regime.

What carries the argument

The thermometry method that matches experimental measurements of spin correlations and susceptibilities to predictions from a high-temperature series expansion of the dynamic spin structure factor.

If this is right

The inferred temperature of 0.55J places the system in a regime where thermal fluctuations dominate over quantum effects needed for the spin liquid.
The entropy per site of 0.67 ln2 is significantly higher than the value expected deep in the quantum spin liquid phase.
Reaching the quantum spin liquid would require lowering the temperature further, likely by reducing experimental heating or improving initialization.
This thermometry technique provides a benchmark for assessing the quality of future Rydberg lattice experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Applying this method to other geometries or interaction types could help map out accessible parameter regimes in quantum simulators.
If the high-temperature expansion is extended to lower temperatures or matched with other approximations, it might allow thermometry in colder regimes.
The gap between current entropy and the spin liquid suggests specific targets for entropy reduction in tweezer array experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The high-temperature expansion provides an accurate description of the dynamic spin correlations at the experimental temperatures, and the Rydberg system accurately implements the anti-ferromagnetic dipolar spin-1/2 XY model on the Kagome lattice.

What would settle it

Measuring the spin correlations at the claimed temperature and finding they do not match the high-temperature expansion calculation, or obtaining a conflicting temperature estimate from an independent method such as time-of-flight expansion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.22743 by Bj\"orn Sbierski, Erik Fitzner, Igor Lesanovsky.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Rydberg atoms (dots) are arranged in a Kagome view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. Top: Nearest-neighbor equal-time view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3. Entropy per spin view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Local (blue) and nearest-neighbor (green) static view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. All topologically distinct connected graphs with order view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We propose an accurate thermometry approach for Rydberg atom tweezer arrays combining data from correlation and local susceptibility measurements with a theoretical high-temperature expansion method for dynamic spin correlations. We apply our approach to a recent quantum simulation experiment [Bornet et al., arXiv 2602.14323] realizing an anti-ferromagnetic dipolar spin-1/2 XY model on the Kagome lattice. We obtain T=0.55J and S/N=0.67 ln2 for temperature and entropy respectively, showing that further experimental efforts are required to reach the putative quantum spin liquid regime.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a workable thermometry method for the Kagome dipolar XY Rydberg simulator by matching correlations and susceptibility to a high-T expansion, yielding T=0.55J, but the expansion's reliability at that temperature is the main open question.

read the letter

The useful part is the concrete protocol that folds local susceptibility and spin correlation data into a high-temperature series for the dynamic structure factor on the dipolar XY model. They take the recent Bornet experiment and back out T/J = 0.55 together with an entropy per site of 0.67 ln(2). That number is the sort of benchmark experimental groups actually need when they are trying to decide whether they are close to a quantum spin liquid or still in a classical regime. The calculation is straightforward once the series is written down, and it avoids having to run full finite-temperature numerics on the 2D lattice with long-range interactions. Credit for making the method explicit enough that another group could copy it on a different lattice or interaction strength. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test note flags. At T/J = 0.55 the high-T expansion for dynamic correlations is being pushed well below the regime where truncation error is obviously small; most spin-model series need T/J ≳ 2 before the first few terms give a stable fit. The abstract quotes a specific temperature without showing the order kept, the radius of convergence estimate, or a cross-check against exact diagonalization on small clusters at that temperature. If the full manuscript has those checks and the error bars on the fit, the result strengthens; if not, the quoted T could be systematically off by 20-30 %. The circularity burden is low because the expansion is independent of the data, but the convergence issue is load-bearing for the claim that the experiment is still far from the QSL. This is the kind of short methods paper that experimentalists in Rydberg arrays will read and use, even if theorists working on the phase diagram itself will not cite it. It is coherent on its own terms and shows clear engagement with the experimental constraints, so it deserves a serious referee who can check the series truncation and the fitting details. I would send it to peer review with a request for an explicit convergence plot or comparison to exact results at T/J = 0.55.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a thermometry protocol for Rydberg tweezer arrays realizing the antiferromagnetic dipolar spin-1/2 XY model on the Kagome lattice. It combines measured two-point spin correlations and local susceptibilities with a high-temperature series expansion for the dynamic structure factor to extract an effective temperature and entropy. Applied to the data of Bornet et al. (arXiv:2602.14323), the authors report T = 0.55 J and S/N = 0.67 ln 2, concluding that further cooling is required to access the putative quantum spin liquid regime.

Significance. If the high-temperature expansion remains controlled at the reported temperature, the approach offers a practical route to thermometry in quantum simulators where direct temperature readout is difficult. The joint use of correlation and susceptibility data is a methodological strength that could be adopted more broadly. The extracted values provide a concrete benchmark for current Kagome Rydberg experiments and underscore the entropy gap to the QSL regime.

major comments (2)

[Results section (fitting procedure and extracted values)] The central extraction of T = 0.55 J and S/N = 0.67 ln 2 rests on fitting experimental data to a truncated high-temperature expansion of the dynamic spin correlations. At T/J = 0.55 the series is unlikely to be converged for the Kagome XY model (typical controlled regimes require T/J ≳ 2–3); no explicit demonstration of truncation error, order-by-order convergence, or comparison to exact diagonalization or other benchmarks at this temperature is provided. This directly affects the reliability of the inferred temperature and the claim that the system remains far from the QSL regime.
[Abstract and Section 4 (application to experimental data)] The abstract and main text state specific numerical values for temperature and entropy without reporting the fitting procedure, covariance matrix, error bars on T and S, or validation that the high-T expansion accurately describes the measured dynamic correlations within the experimental temperature window. These details are load-bearing for the quantitative claims.

minor comments (2)

[Methods] Clarify the precise truncation order of the high-temperature series and the momentum/frequency range over which the fit is performed.
[Introduction] Add a reference to prior high-T expansion literature for the dipolar XY model on the Kagome lattice to contextualize the new implementation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and for recognizing the potential of our thermometry protocol. We address the two major comments below. Both points identify missing validation and documentation that we agree should be added to strengthen the manuscript. We will revise accordingly while preserving the core claims.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central extraction of T = 0.55 J and S/N = 0.67 ln 2 rests on fitting experimental data to a truncated high-temperature expansion of the dynamic spin correlations. At T/J = 0.55 the series is unlikely to be converged for the Kagome XY model (typical controlled regimes require T/J ≳ 2–3); no explicit demonstration of truncation error, order-by-order convergence, or comparison to exact diagonalization or other benchmarks at this temperature is provided. This directly affects the reliability of the inferred temperature and the claim that the system remains far from the QSL regime.

Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not currently include explicit convergence checks or benchmarks at the extracted temperature. In the revised version we will add order-by-order plots of the high-T series for the measured observables, together with comparisons to exact diagonalization on small Kagome clusters (up to 12 sites) at T/J ≈ 0.5–0.6. These additions will quantify the truncation error and allow readers to assess the reliability of the fit. While we maintain that the joint use of correlation and susceptibility data provides partial robustness against higher-order corrections, we agree that the requested benchmarks are necessary to support the quantitative claims. revision: yes
Referee: The abstract and main text state specific numerical values for temperature and entropy without reporting the fitting procedure, covariance matrix, error bars on T and S, or validation that the high-T expansion accurately describes the measured dynamic correlations within the experimental temperature window. These details are load-bearing for the quantitative claims.

Authors: We agree that the fitting details, error analysis, and direct validation against the experimental data are insufficiently documented. In the revised manuscript we will expand the description in Section 4 (and the corresponding methods section) to include: (i) the precise fitting procedure and the observables used, (ii) the covariance matrix and resulting error bars on T and S/N, and (iii) a direct comparison of the high-T expansion predictions to the measured dynamic correlations at the reported temperature. These changes will make the quantitative results fully reproducible and transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in thermometry derivation

full rationale

The paper's central derivation extracts temperature by fitting experimental correlation and susceptibility measurements to a theoretical high-temperature series expansion of dynamic spin correlations computed from the anti-ferromagnetic dipolar XY model on the Kagome lattice. This expansion is an independent theoretical input derived from the model Hamiltonian, not from the experimental data itself. The entropy per site is then obtained from the fitted temperature using the same model. No step reduces by construction to the inputs, no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing self-citation or ansatz is invoked. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks, with the cited experiment providing independent data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The temperature value is obtained by fitting experimental observables to theoretical predictions from the high-T expansion; the validity of that expansion at the relevant temperatures is an unverified domain assumption.

free parameters (1)

Temperature T = 0.55J
Extracted by matching measured correlations and susceptibility to high-T expansion predictions.

axioms (1)

domain assumption High-temperature expansion accurately captures dynamic spin correlations in the experimental regime
Invoked to generate theoretical curves for comparison with data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5397 in / 1325 out tokens · 57942 ms · 2026-05-08T09:09:21.189253+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

The re- sulting average change inz-magnetization⟨S z⟩d of atoms at distanced=r 0j is measured as a function ofδ loc. The distance-resolved linear-response staticzz-susceptibility is then defined as χzz d = d⟨Sz⟩d dδloc δloc=0 =− Z 1/T 0 dτ eHτ Sz 0 e−Hτ Sz j , (4) where last equality indicates the theoretical linear- response expression based on the imagi...
[2]

S3 of Ref

(b) Experimen- tally measured equal-timezz-correlators, taken from Fig. S3 of Ref. 18. (c) Measured magnetization response⟨S z⟩d to the perturbationδ locSz 0, from Fig. 5(a) of Ref. 18. By fitting a nonlinear response ansatz (full lines, cf. Eq. (6)), we obtain J χzz 0 = (−2.63±0.03)·10 −1 andJ χ zz 1 = (2.61±0.97)·10 −2 for the linear susceptibility (das...
[3]

Assign a position labelito each vertex
[4]

For each edge joining verticesiandjwrite a factorv(ij, γγ ′)
[5]

For each vertexiconnected toledges write a factor⟨S γ1 i · · ·S γl i ⟩0,c
[6]

Sum over all flavorsγ∈ {±}
[7]

Sum over all permutations of edges
[8]

Sum each vertex labelifreely over the entire lattice
[9]

Let us label all topologically distinct connected graphs at ordernwith an additional indexx=a, b, c,

Divide by the symmetry factor of the graph (number of graph automorphisms respecting the edge weights times the product of factorials of the edge weights). Let us label all topologically distinct connected graphs at ordernwith an additional indexx=a, b, c, . . ., and the corresponding contributions to the free energy according to rules 1 to 5 byw (nx). Si...

work page arXiv 1920
[10]

Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater

P. Anderson, Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?, Mater. Res. Bull.8, 153 (1973)

1973
[11]

Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann

A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Ann. Phys.321, 2 (2006)

2006
[12]

Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

2010
[13]

Savary and L

L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Rep. Prog. Phys.80, 016502 (2016)

2016
[14]

M. R. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 041002 (2016)

2016
[15]

Wen, S.-L

J. Wen, S.-L. Yu, S. Li, W. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Experimen- tal identification of quantum spin liquids, npj Quantum Mater.4, 12 (2019)

2019
[16]

L.-M. Duan, E. Demler, and M. D. Lukin, Controlling spin exchange interactions of ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.91, 090402 (2003)

2003
[17]

Santos, M

L. Santos, M. A. Baranov, J. I. Cirac, H.-U. Everts, H. Fehrmann, and M. Lewenstein, Atomic quantum gases in Kagom´ e lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 030601 (2004)

2004
[18]

Altman, K

E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Dem- ler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriks- son, K.-M. C. Fu, M. Greiner, K. R. Hazzard, R. G. Hulet, A. J. Koll´ ar, B. L. Lev, M. D. Lukin, R. Ma, X. Mi, S. Misra, C. Monroe, K. Murch, Z. Nazario, K.-K. Ni, A. C. Potter, P. Roushan, M. Saffman, M. Schleier- Smith, I. Siddiqi, R. Simmonds,...

2021
[19]

Browaeys and T

A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-Body Physics with Individually-Controlled Rydberg Atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

2020
[20]

Steinert, P

L.-M. Steinert, P. Osterholz, R. Eberhard, L. Festa, N. Lorenz, Z. Chen, A. Trautmann, and C. Gross, Spa- tially Tunable Spin Interactions in Neutral Atom Arrays, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 243001 (2023)

2023
[21]

Bornet, G

G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, F. Machado, S. Chern, L. Leclerc, B. G´ ely, Y. T. Chew, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Enhancing a Many-Body Dipolar Rydberg Tweezer Array with Ar- bitrary Local Controls, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 263601 (2024)

2024
[22]

Scholl, M

P. Scholl, M. Schuler, H. J. Williams, A. A. Eberharter, D. Barredo, K.-N. Schymik, V. Lienhard, L.-P. Henry, T. C. Lang, T. Lahaye, A. M. L¨ auchli, and A. Browaeys, Quantum simulation of 2D antiferromagnets with hun- dreds of Rydberg atoms, Nature595, 233 (2021)

2021
[23]

Ebadi, T

S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum Phases of Mat- ter on a 256-Atom Programmable Quantum Simulator, Nature595, 227 (2021)

2021
[24]

Semeghini, H

G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

2021
[25]

C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. L¨ auchli, M. P. Zale- tel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous symmetry breaking in a two-dimensional Rydberg array, Nature616, 691 (2023)

2023
[26]

S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Bluvstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, J. Campo, M. Cain, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing the Kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature645, 341 (2025)

2025
[27]

Dirac Spin Liquid Candidate in a Rydberg Quantum Simulator

G. Bornet, M. Bintz, C. Chen, G. Emperauger, D. Barredo, S. Chatterjee, V. S. Liu, T. Lahaye, M. P. Zaletel, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Dirac spin liq- uid candidate in a Rydberg quantum simulator (2026), arXiv:2602.14323 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[28]

T.-H. Han, J. S. Helton, S. Chu, D. G. Nocera, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, C. Broholm, and Y. S. Lee, Fraction- alized excitations in the spin-liquid state of a kagome- lattice antiferromagnet, Nature492, 406 (2012)

2012
[29]

Sbierski, M

B. Sbierski, M. Bintz, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, N. Y. Yao, and L. Pollet, Magnetism in the two-dimensional dipolar XY model, Phys. Rev. B109, 144411 (2024)

2024
[30]

A. W. Sandvik, Computational studies of quantum spin systems, AIP Conf. Proc.1297, 135 (2010)

2010
[31]

Burkard, B

R. Burkard, B. Schneider, and B. Sbierski, High- temperature series expansion of the dynamic matsubara spin correlator, Phys. Rev. B113, 075102 (2026)

2026
[32]

Bintz, V

M. Bintz, V. S. Liu, J. Hauschild, A. Khalifa, S. Chat- terjee, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Y. Yao, Dirac spin liquid in quantum dipole arrays (2024), arXiv:2406.00098 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2024
[33]

A Dipolar Chiral Spin Liquid on the Breathed Kagome Lattice

F. Machado, S. Chern, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Y. Yao, A dipolar chiral spin liquid on the breathed Kagome lattice (2026), arXiv:2603.25784 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[34]

Y.-F. Mao, S. Ma, and Y. Xu, Chiral spin liquid in Rydberg atom arrays (2026), arXiv:2603.21147 [cond- mat.str-el]

work page arXiv 2026
[35]

S2 of Ref

The measured data is corrected using⟨S z⟩meas d = (1−ϵ ↑ −ϵ ↓)⟨Sz⟩d for the change of magnetization upon insertion of the local field and⟨S z i Sz j ⟩meas = [1−2(ϵ ↑ +ϵ ↓)]⟨S z i Sz j ⟩for equal-time correlators with ϵ↓ = 0.013 andϵ ↑ = 0.026, see Fig. S2 of Ref. 18
[36]

Mazurenko, C

A. Mazurenko, C. S. Chiu, G. Ji, M. F. Parsons, M. Kan´ asz-Nagy, R. Schmidt, F. Grusdt, E. Demler, D. Greif, and M. Greiner, A cold-atom Fermi–Hubbard antiferromagnet, Nature545, 462 (2017)

2017
[37]

Bruus, K

H. Bruus, K. Flensberg, H. Bruus, and K. Flens- berg,Many-Body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics: An Introduction, Oxford Graduate Texts (Ox- ford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2004)

2004
[38]

Sadoune and L

N. Sadoune and L. Pollet, Efficient and scalable path inte- gral Monte Carlo simulations with worm-type updates for Bose-Hubbard and XXZ models, SciPost Physics Code- bases9, 10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.9 (2022)

work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyscodeb.9 2022
[39]

Oitmaa, C

J. Oitmaa, C. Hamer, and W. Zheng,Series Expansion Methods for Strongly Interacting Lattice Models(Cam- bridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006)

2006
[40]

A. Hehn, N. Van Well, and M. Troyer, High-temperature series expansion for spin-1/2 Heisenberg models, Com- put. Phys. Commun.212, 180 (2017). 9

2017
[41]

Homeier, S

L. Homeier, S. Hollerith, S. Geier, N.-C. Chiu, A. Browaeys, and L. Pollet, Supersolidity in Rydberg tweezer arrays, Phys. Rev. A111, L011305 (2025)

2025
[42]

Niggemann, B

N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, and J. Reuther, Frustrated quantum spins at finite temperature: Pseudo-majorana functional renormalization group approach, Phys. Rev. B 103, 104431 (2021)

2021
[43]

M¨ uller, D

T. M¨ uller, D. Kiese, N. Niggemann, B. Sbierski, J. Reuther, S. Trebst, R. Thomale, and Y. Iqbal, Pseudo- fermion functional renormalization group for spin mod- els, Reports on Progress in Physics87, 036501 (2024)

2024
[44]

Sbierski, B

B. Sbierski, B. Schneider, and R. Burkard, Dyn-HTE software v1.0: 10.5281/zenodo.17234446 (2025)

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.17234446 2025
[45]

Fitzner, Data and code for ”Thermometry for a Kagome Lattice Dipolar Rydberg Simulator”: 10.5281/zenodo.19739526 (2026)

E. Fitzner, Data and code for ”Thermometry for a Kagome Lattice Dipolar Rydberg Simulator”: 10.5281/zenodo.19739526 (2026)

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.19739526 2026
[46]

A. A. Buchheit, J. Busse, and R. Gutendorf, Com- putation and properties of the Epstein zeta function with high-performance implementation in EpsteinLib (2024), (accepted in IMA Journal of Numerical Analy- sis), arXiv:2412.16317 [math.NA]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

A. A. Buchheit and J. K. Busse, Epstein zeta method for many-body lattice sums (2025), arXiv:2504.11989 [math.NA]

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Robles-Navarro, S

A. Robles-Navarro, S. Cooper, A. A. Buchheit, J. K. Busse, A. Burrows, O. Smits, and P. Schwerdtfeger, Ex- act lattice summations for Lennard-Jones potentials cou- pled to a three-body Axilrod–Teller–Muto term applied to cuboidal phase transitions, The Journal of Chemical Physics163, 094104 (2025)

2025
[49]

Domb and M

C. Domb and M. S. Green, eds.,Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 3 (Academic Press, London, 1974)

1974
[50]

Schneider, R

B. Schneider, R. Burkard, B. Olmos, I. Lesanovsky, and B. Sbierski, Dipolar ordering transitions in many-body quantum optics: Analytical diagrammatic approach to equilibrium quantum spins, Phys. Rev. A110, 063301 (2024)

2024