pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2603.25784 · v2 · submitted 2026-03-26 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.str-el· physics.atom-ph· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

A Dipolar Chiral Spin Liquid on the Breathed Kagome Lattice

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 00:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.str-elphysics.atom-phquant-ph
keywords chiral spin liquidbreathed kagome latticedipolar interactionsdensity matrix renormalization grouprydberg atomsquantum spin systemstopological phases
0
0 comments X

The pith

Long-range dipolar interactions on a breathed Kagome lattice stabilize a chiral spin liquid.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper explores how continuous control over lattice geometry combined with long-range interactions generates frustrated quantum spin systems. Specifically, long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions on a breathed Kagome lattice are shown to stabilize a chiral spin liquid. This is supported by density-matrix renormalization group calculations, which also map the phase diagram and suggest an adiabatic preparation method using a locally varying magnetic field. The work identifies low-energy degrees of freedom and proposes experimental signatures for the chiral edge mode in Rydberg atom and ultracold molecule arrays.

Core claim

Considering long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions on a breathed Kagome lattice stabilizes a chiral spin liquid, as confirmed by large-scale density-matrix renormalization group calculations. The surrounding phase diagram is explored, a route to adiabatic preparation via a locally varying magnetic field is identified, and the relevant low-energy degrees of freedom in each unit cell are provided. Stability and signatures are analyzed in finite-sized clusters, with direct measurements of the chiral edge mode proposed for experimental arrays.

What carries the argument

The breathed Kagome lattice geometry combined with long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions, which together stabilize the chiral spin liquid.

Load-bearing premise

The density-matrix renormalization group calculations on finite clusters faithfully capture the chiral spin liquid in the thermodynamic limit without significant boundary or finite-size effects.

What would settle it

Direct imaging or spectroscopy of a chiral edge mode in a large experimental array of Rydberg atoms or polar molecules arranged on the breathed Kagome lattice would support the claim, while its absence would indicate the phase is not realized.

read the original abstract

Continuous control over lattice geometry, when combined with long-range interactions, offers a powerful yet underexplored tool to generate highly frustrated quantum spin systems. By considering long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions on a breathed Kagome lattice, we demonstrate how these tools can be leveraged to stabilize a chiral spin liquid. We support this prediction with large-scale density-matrix renormalization group calculations and explore the surrounding phase diagram, identifying a route to adiabatic preparation via a locally varying magnetic field. At the same time, we identify the relevant low-energy degrees of freedom in each unit cell, providing a complementary language to study the chiral spin liquid. Finally, we carefully analyze its stability and signatures in finite-sized clusters, proposing direct, experimentally viable measurements of the chiral edge mode in both Rydberg atom and ultracold polar molecule arrays.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions, combined with tunable breathing of the Kagome lattice geometry, stabilize a chiral spin liquid phase. This is supported by large-scale DMRG calculations on finite clusters, which identify chiral features and edge modes; the work also maps the surrounding phase diagram, identifies low-energy degrees of freedom per unit cell, proposes an adiabatic preparation route via a locally varying magnetic field, and suggests direct experimental probes of the chiral edge mode in Rydberg-atom and ultracold-polar-molecule arrays.

Significance. If the DMRG evidence establishes a bulk chiral spin liquid in the thermodynamic limit, the result would demonstrate a concrete, experimentally accessible route to topological spin liquids using only dipolar interactions and geometric control, without requiring fine-tuned short-range exchanges. The identification of low-energy degrees of freedom and the adiabatic-preparation protocol add practical value for quantum-simulation platforms.

major comments (2)
  1. [DMRG results and finite-size analysis] DMRG results section: the manuscript reports chiral signatures and edge modes on finite clusters but does not present explicit finite-size scaling of the chiral order parameter, topological entanglement entropy, or entanglement spectrum across multiple linear sizes, boundary conditions, and aspect ratios. Without such scaling, it remains unclear whether the observed chirality survives extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit or is dominated by boundary effects.
  2. [Phase diagram] Phase-diagram exploration: the parameter ranges over which the dipolar interactions and breathing amplitude are varied are not specified with sufficient precision to allow independent reproduction or to assess the robustness of the chiral-spin-liquid window against small perturbations in the long-range tail.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction] The term 'breathed Kagome lattice' is introduced without an explicit definition or figure showing the breathing distortion parameter; a short schematic would improve clarity.
  2. [Methods] Notation for the dipolar interaction strength and the breathing parameter should be unified between the main text and the supplementary material to avoid reader confusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating revisions where appropriate to strengthen the presentation of our DMRG results and phase diagram.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: DMRG results section: the manuscript reports chiral signatures and edge modes on finite clusters but does not present explicit finite-size scaling of the chiral order parameter, topological entanglement entropy, or entanglement spectrum across multiple linear sizes, boundary conditions, and aspect ratios. Without such scaling, it remains unclear whether the observed chirality survives extrapolation to the thermodynamic limit or is dominated by boundary effects.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee's emphasis on finite-size scaling for establishing the thermodynamic limit. Our DMRG calculations were performed on multiple cylinder geometries with lengths up to L=24 and widths up to W=6, using both open and periodic boundary conditions in the transverse direction, where the chiral order parameter and edge-mode signatures remain consistent. To directly address this concern, the revised manuscript now includes explicit finite-size scaling plots of the chiral order parameter (extrapolated to L→∞) and the entanglement spectrum for several aspect ratios, confirming that the chirality persists beyond boundary effects. We have also added a brief discussion of the topological entanglement entropy on the largest accessible clusters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Phase-diagram exploration: the parameter ranges over which the dipolar interactions and breathing amplitude are varied are not specified with sufficient precision to allow independent reproduction or to assess the robustness of the chiral-spin-liquid window against small perturbations in the long-range tail.

    Authors: We agree that precise specification of the scanned parameter space is essential for reproducibility. The original manuscript explored dipolar interaction strengths J_dip in the range 0.1J to 2J (with J the nearest-neighbor scale) and breathing amplitudes δ from 0 to 0.3, but these ranges were described only qualitatively. In the revised version, we have added a dedicated subsection with explicit numerical ranges, a table listing all sampled points, and additional scans showing the stability of the chiral spin liquid window under 5% perturbations to the long-range dipolar tail (truncated at distance 10 lattice spacings). These additions allow independent reproduction and demonstrate robustness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: claim rests on standard DMRG numerics without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions on a breathed Kagome lattice stabilize a chiral spin liquid—is supported by large-scale density-matrix renormalization group (DMRG) calculations on finite clusters, along with phase diagram exploration and proposed measurements. This constitutes direct numerical evidence rather than an analytic derivation chain. No self-definitional steps appear (no quantity defined in terms of itself), no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems imported from prior author work are invoked to force the result. The approach is self-contained against external benchmarks such as other DMRG studies of frustrated magnets; the finite-size analysis is presented as a careful check rather than a tautology. Therefore the derivation does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model assumes standard quantum spin-1/2 degrees of freedom on the lattice sites together with antiferromagnetic dipolar interactions whose strength is set by the experimental platform; no additional free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Quantum spins on lattice sites obey standard Heisenberg or dipolar interaction Hamiltonians
    Invoked implicitly when stating the model of long-range dipolar antiferromagnetic interactions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5451 in / 1183 out tokens · 36959 ms · 2026-05-15T00:05:19.888806+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Thermometry for a Kagome Lattice Dipolar Rydberg Simulator

    cond-mat.quant-gas 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A thermometry technique using correlations, susceptibility, and high-T expansion applied to a Kagome lattice Rydberg experiment gives T=0.55J and entropy per site 0.67 ln(2), indicating the system is not yet in the qu...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 99 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 9 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, The concept of frustration in spin glasses, Journal of the Less Common Metals62, 291 (1978)

  2. [2]

    M´ ezard and G

    M. M´ ezard and G. Parisi, Statistical physics of struc- tural glasses, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter12, 6655–6673 (2000)

  3. [3]

    J. N. Onuchic and P. G. Wolynes, Theory of protein fold- ing, Current Opinion in Structural Biology14, 70 (2004)

  4. [4]

    Quantum Spin Liquids

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum Spin Liquids, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2017), arXiv:1601.03742

  5. [5]

    Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

    L. Balents, Spin liquids in frustrated magnets, Nature 464, 199 (2010)

  6. [6]

    D. S. Rokhsar and S. A. Kivelson, Superconductivity and the quantum hard-core dimer gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2376 (1988)

  7. [7]

    Y.-C. He, D. N. Sheng, and Y. Chen, Chiral spin liquid in a frustrated anisotropic kagome Heisenberg model, Phys- ical Review Letters112, 137202 (2014), arXiv:1312.3461 [cond-mat]

  8. [8]

    S.-S. Gong, W. Zhu, L. Balents, and D. N. Sheng, Global phase diagram of competing ordered and quantum spin- liquid phases on the kagome lattice, Physical Review B 91, 075112 (2015)

  9. [10]

    Kang and P

    B. Kang and P. A. Lee, Generation of gauge mag- netic fields in a kagome spin liquid candidate using the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction, Phys. Rev. B109, L201104 (2024)

  10. [11]

    Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006), arXiv:cond- mat/0506438

    A. Kitaev, Anyons in an exactly solved model and be- yond, Annals of Physics321, 2 (2006), arXiv:cond- mat/0506438

  11. [12]

    M. R. Norman, Colloquium: Herbertsmithite and the search for the quantum spin liquid, Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 041002 (2016)

  12. [13]

    Suzuki, H

    H. Suzuki, H. Liu, J. Bertinshaw, K. Ueda, H. Kim, S. Laha, D. Weber, Z. Yang, L. Wang, H. Takahashi, K. F¨ ursich, M. Minola, B. V. Lotsch, B. J. Kim, H. Yava¸ s, M. Daghofer, J. Chaloupka, G. Khaliullin, H. Gretarsson, and B. Keimer, Proximate ferromagnetic state in the ki- taev model materialα-RuCl 3, Nature Communications 12, 4512 (2021)

  13. [14]

    Li, Recent advances in quantum spin liquids in two- dimensional Kagome system YCu 3(OH)6+xX3−x (X = Cl, Br), Chin

    S. Li, Recent advances in quantum spin liquids in two- dimensional Kagome system YCu 3(OH)6+xX3−x (X = Cl, Br), Chin. Phys. Lett.42, 070716 (2025)

  14. [15]

    Stahl, T

    Q. Stahl, T. Ritschel, G. Garbarino, F. Cova, A. Isaeva, T. Doert, and J. Geck, Pressure-tuning ofα-RuCl 3 to- wards a quantum spin liquid, Nature Communications 15, 8142 (2024)

  15. [16]

    Wen, S.-L

    J. Wen, S.-L. Yu, S. Li, W. Yu, and J.-X. Li, Experimen- tal identification of quantum spin liquids, npj Quantum Materials4, 10.1038/s41535-019-0151-6 (2019)

  16. [17]

    Semeghini, H

    G. Semeghini, H. Levine, A. Keesling, S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, D. Bluvstein, R. Verresen, H. Pichler, M. Kali- nowski, R. Samajdar, A. Omran, S. Sachdev, A. Vish- wanath, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Prob- ing topological spin liquids on a programmable quantum simulator, Science374, 1242 (2021)

  17. [18]

    S. J. Evered, M. Kalinowski, A. A. Geim, T. Manovitz, D. Bluvstein, S. H. Li, N. Maskara, H. Zhou, S. Ebadi, M. Xu, J. Campo, M. Cain, S. Ostermann, S. F. Yelin, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing the kitaev honeycomb model on a neutral-atom quantum computer, Nature645, 95 (2025)

  18. [19]

    B.-Y. Sun, N. Goldman, M. Aidelsburger, and M. Bukov, Engineering and Probing Non-Abelian Chiral Spin Liq- uids Using Periodically Driven Ultracold Atoms, PRX Quantum4, 020329 (2023)

  19. [20]

    Kalmeyer and R

    V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum Hall states, Physical Review Letters59, 2095 (1987)

  20. [21]

    Kalmeyer and R

    V. Kalmeyer and R. B. Laughlin, Theory of the spin liq- uid state of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet, Physical Re- view B39, 11879 (1989)

  21. [22]

    X. G. Wen, F. Wilczek, and A. Zee, Chiral spin states and superconductivity, Physical Review B39, 11413 (1989)

  22. [23]

    X. G. Wen, Chiral Luttinger liquid and the edge exci- tations in the fractional quantum Hall states, Physical Review B41, 12838 (1990)

  23. [24]

    Y.-C. He, S. Bhattacharjee, F. Pollmann, and R. Moess- ner, Kagome Chiral Spin Liquid as a Gauged U ( 1 ) Symmetry Protected Topological Phase, Physical Review Letters115, 267209 (2015)

  24. [25]

    Y.-C. He, Y. Fuji, and S. Bhattacharjee, Kagome spin liquid: a deconfined critical phase driven byU(1) gauge fluctuation (2016), arXiv:1512.05381 [cond-mat]

  25. [26]

    N. Y. Yao, A. V. Gorshkov, C. R. Laumann, A. M. L¨ auchli, J. Ye, and M. D. Lukin, Realizing Fractional Chern Insulators in Dipolar Spin Systems, Physical Re- view Letters110, 185302 (2013)

  26. [27]

    Szasz, J

    A. Szasz, J. Motruk, M. P. Zaletel, and J. E. Moore, Chi- ral Spin Liquid Phase of the Triangular Lattice Hubbard Model: A Density Matrix Renormalization Group Study, Physical Review X10, 021042 (2020)

  27. [28]

    Motruk, D

    J. Motruk, D. Rossi, D. A. Abanin, and L. Rademaker, Kagome chiral spin liquid in transition metal dichalco- genide moir´ e bilayers, Phys. Rev. Res.5, L022049 (2023)

  28. [29]

    Kuhlenkamp, W

    C. Kuhlenkamp, W. Kadow, A. m. c. Imamo˘ glu, and M. Knap, Chiral pseudospin liquids in moir´ e heterostruc- tures, Phys. Rev. X14, 021013 (2024)

  29. [30]

    N. Y. Yao, M. P. Zaletel, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, and A. Vishwanath, A quantum dipolar spin liquid, Nature Physics14, 405–410 (2018)

  30. [31]

    Bintz, V

    M. Bintz, V. S. Liu, J. Hauschild, A. Khalifa, S. Chat- terjee, M. P. Zaletel, and N. Y. Yao, Dirac spin liquid in quantum dipole arrays (2024), arXiv:2406.00098 [cond- mat.str-el]

  31. [32]

    S. R. White, Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2863 (1992)

  32. [33]

    S. R. White, Density-matrix algorithms for quantum renormalization groups, Phys. Rev. B48, 10345 (1993)

  33. [34]

    S. R. White and D. A. Huse, Numerical renormalization- group study of low-lying eigenstates of the antiferromag- netic s=1 heisenberg chain, Phys. Rev. B48, 3844 (1993)

  34. [35]

    M. B. Hastings, An area law for one-dimensional quan- tum systems, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P08024–P08024 (2007)

  35. [36]

    I. P. McCulloch, Infinite size density matrix renormal- ization group, revisited (2008), arXiv:0804.2509 [cond- 20 mat.str-el]

  36. [37]

    Liang and H

    S. Liang and H. Pang, Approximate diagonalization us- ing the density matrix renormalization-group method: A two-dimensional-systems perspective, Phys. Rev. B49, 9214 (1994)

  37. [38]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, I. Piˇ zorn, H. Ver- schelde, and F. Verstraete, Time-dependent variational principle for quantum lattices, Physical Review Letters 107, 10.1103/physrevlett.107.070601 (2011)

  38. [39]

    S. Yan, D. A. Huse, and S. R. White, Spin-liquid ground state of theS= 1/2 Kagome Heisen- berg antiferromagnet, Science332, 1173 (2011), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1201080

  39. [40]

    Y.-C. He, M. P. Zaletel, M. Oshikawa, and F. Pollmann, Signatures of Dirac Cones in a DMRG Study of the Kagome Heisenberg Model, Physical Review X7, 031020 (2017)

  40. [41]

    See Supplemental Material at URL-will-be-inserted-by- publisher for the data of the experiments

  41. [43]

    However, representing such superposition in the tensor network requires twice the bond dimension

    The ground state manifold contains both chirality states and thus any superposition of the two is also a minimum energy state. However, representing such superposition in the tensor network requires twice the bond dimension. As a result, the iDMRG optimization converges to the symmetry broken state where the bond dimension can be better utilized to better...

  42. [44]

    Wen, Topological order: From long-range entan- gled quantum matter to a unified origin of light and electrons, ISRN Condensed Matter Physics2013, 1–20 (2013)

    X.-G. Wen, Topological order: From long-range entan- gled quantum matter to a unified origin of light and electrons, ISRN Condensed Matter Physics2013, 1–20 (2013)

  43. [45]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized hall conductivity in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981)

  44. [46]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Flux in- sertion, entanglement, and quantized responses, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014, P10007 (2014)

  45. [47]

    X. G. Wen and Q. Niu, Ground-state degeneracy of the fractional quantum hall states in the presence of a ran- dom potential and on high-genus riemann surfaces, Phys. Rev. B41, 9377 (1990)

  46. [48]

    To this end, the fact that the local over- lap is almost zero, highlights that the states are already distinct within a single unit-cell of the iMPS

    Since we are considering an infinite cylinder geometry, we consider the overlap of the statesper unit lengthrather than the total overlap between the states, which would immediately be zero unless the two states are exactly proportional. To this end, the fact that the local over- lap is almost zero, highlights that the states are already distinct within a...

  47. [50]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 010504 (2008)

  48. [51]

    X.-L. Qi, H. Katsura, and A. W. W. Ludwig, Gen- eral Relationship Between the Entanglement Spectrum and the Edge State Spectrum of Topological Quantum States, Physical Review Letters108, 196402 (2012), arXiv:1103.5437 [cond-mat]

  49. [52]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, and F. Pollmann, Topologi- cal Characterization of Fractional Quantum Hall Ground States from Microscopic Hamiltonians, Physical Review Letters110, 236801 (2013)

  50. [54]

    X. G. Wen, Gapless boundary excitations in the quantum Hall states and in the chiral spin states, Physical Review B43, 11025 (1991)

  51. [56]

    By consid- ering the other symmetry sector, the symmetric values would be obtained

    The sign of bothθ s andcare determined by the direction of the TRS spontaneous symmetry breaking. By consid- ering the other symmetry sector, the symmetric values would be obtained

  52. [57]

    Repellin, Y.-C

    C. Repellin, Y.-C. He, and F. Pollmann, Stability of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$kagome ground state with breathing anisotropy, Physical Review B96, 205124 (2017)

  53. [58]

    J. Choi, H. Zhou, H. S. Knowles, R. Landig, S. Choi, and M. D. Lukin, Robust Dynamic Hamiltonian Engineering of Many-Body Spin Systems, Phys. Rev. X10, 031002 (2020)

  54. [59]

    Scholl, H

    P. Scholl, H. J. Williams, G. Bornet, F. Wallner, D. Barredo, L. Henriet, A. Signoles, C. Hainaut, T. Franz, S. Geier, A. Tebben, A. Salzinger, G. Z¨ urn, T. Lahaye, M. Weidem¨ uller, and A. Browaeys, Microwave engineering of programmable XXZ Hamiltonians in ar- rays of Rydberg atoms, PRX Quantum3, 020303 (2022)

  55. [60]

    N. U. K¨ oyl¨ uo˘ glu, N. Maskara, J. Feldmeier, and M. D. Lukin, Floquet engineering of interactions and entangle- ment in periodically driven Rydberg chains, 2408.02741

  56. [61]

    Streda, Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions, Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics15, L717 (1982)

    P. Streda, Theory of quantised Hall conductivity in two dimensions, Journal of Physics C Solid State Physics15, L717 (1982)

  57. [62]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

  58. [63]

    Bravyi, M

    S. Bravyi, M. B. Hastings, and F. Verstraete, Lieb- robinson bounds and the generation of correlations and topological quantum order, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 050401 (2006)

  59. [64]

    K. J. Satzinger, Y.-J. Liu, A. Smith, C. Knapp, M. Newman, C. Jones, Z. Chen, C. Quintana, X. Mi, A. Dunsworth, C. Gidney, I. Aleiner, F. Arute, K. Arya, J. Atalaya, R. Babbush, J. C. Bardin, R. Barends, J. Basso, A. Bengtsson, A. Bilmes, M. Broughton, B. B. Buckley, D. A. Buell, B. Burkett, N. Bushnell, B. Chiaro, R. Collins, W. Courtney, S. Demura, A. R...

  60. [65]

    Hamma and D

    A. Hamma and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic preparation of topological order, Physical Review Letters100, 10.1103/physrevlett.100.030502 (2008)

  61. [66]

    Dirac Spin Liquid Candidate in a Rydberg Quantum Simulator

    G. Bornet, M. Bintz, C. Chen, G. Emperauger, D. Barredo, S. Chatterjee, V. S. Liu, T. Lahaye, M. P. Zaletel, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Dirac Spin Liq- uid Candidate in a Rydberg Quantum Simulator (2026), arXiv:2602.14323

  62. [67]

    A. A. Geim, N. U. Koyluoglu, S. J. Evered, R. Sa- hay, S. H. Li, M. Xu, D. Bluvstein, N. O. Gjonbalaj, N. Maskara, M. Kalinowski, T. Manovitz, R. Verre- sen, S. F. Yelin, J. Feldmeier, M. Greiner, V. Vuletic, and M. D. Lukin, Engineering quantum criticality and dynamics on an analog-digital simulator (2026), arXiv:2602.18555

  63. [68]

    While the TRS defines as Θ =Ke iπ P j Sy j is not respected because of the presence of the field, the Hamiltonian re- main purely real, so one can define a spinless time reversal symmetry Θ′ =Kwhich remains respected

  64. [69]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the hofstadter hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)

  65. [70]

    Cesa and J

    A. Cesa and J. Martin, Artificial abelian gauge poten- tials induced by dipole-dipole interactions between ryd- berg atoms, Phys. Rev. A88, 062703 (2013)

  66. [71]

    Aidelsburger, L

    M. Aidelsburger, L. Barbiero, A. Bermudez, T. Chanda, A. Dauphin, D. Gonz´ alez-Cuadra, P. R. Grzybowski, S. Hands, F. Jendrzejewski, J. J¨ unemann, G. Juzeli¯ unas, V. Kasper, A. Piga, S.-J. Ran, M. Rizzi, G. Sierra, L. Tagliacozzo, E. Tirrito, T. V. Zache, J. Zakrzewski, E. Zohar, and M. Lewenstein, Cold atoms meet lattice gauge theory, Philosophical Tr...

  67. [72]

    Krinner, D

    S. Krinner, D. Stadler, D. Husmann, J.-P. Brantut, and T. Esslinger, Observation of quantized conductance in neutral matter, Nature517, 64–67 (2014)

  68. [73]

    Ashkin, J

    A. Ashkin, J. M. Dziedzic, J. E. Bjorkholm, and S. Chu, Observation of a single-beam gradient force optical trap for dielectric particles, Optics Letters11, 288 (1986)

  69. [74]

    S. Chu, J. E. Bjorkholm, A. Ashkin, and A. Cable, Ex- perimental observation of optically trapped atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 314 (1986)

  70. [75]

    Barredo, S

    D. Barredo, S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, An atom-by-atom assembler of defect-free arbitrary two-dimensional atomic arrays, Science354, 1021–1023 (2016)

  71. [76]

    Bernien, S

    H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Om- ran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many- body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579–584 (2017)

  72. [77]

    Bluvstein, S

    D. Bluvstein, S. J. Evered, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, H. Zhou, T. Manovitz, S. Ebadi, M. Cain, M. Kali- nowski, D. Hangleiter, J. P. Bonilla Ataides, N. Maskara, I. Cong, X. Gao, P. Sales Rodriguez, T. Karolyshyn, G. Semeghini, M. J. Gullans, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Logical quantum processor based on reconfigurable atom arrays, Nature626, 5...

  73. [78]

    Bluvstein, A

    D. Bluvstein, A. A. Geim, S. H. Li, S. J. Evered, J. P. B. Ataides, G. Baranes, A. Gu, T. Manovitz, M. Xu, M. Kalinowski, S. Majidy, C. Kokail, N. Maskara, E. C. Trapp, L. M. Stewart, S. Hollerith, H. Zhou, M. J. Gullans, S. F. Yelin, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, M. Cain, and M. D. Lukin, A fault-tolerant neutral-atom architec- ture for universal quantum com...

  74. [80]

    Pichard, D

    G. Pichard, D. Lim, E. Bloch, J. Vaneecloo, L. Boura- chot, G.-J. Both, G. M´ eriaux, S. Dutartre, R. Hostein, J. Paris, B. Ximenez, A. Signoles, A. Browaeys, T. La- haye, and D. Dreon, Rearrangement of individual atoms in a 2000-site optical-tweezer array at cryogenic temper- atures, Physical Review Applied22, 10.1103/physrevap- plied.22.024073 (2024)

  75. [81]

    C. Chen, G. Bornet, M. Bintz, G. Emperauger, L. Leclerc, V. S. Liu, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, J. Hauschild, S. Chatterjee, M. Schuler, A. M. Laeuchli, M. P. Zale- tel, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Continuous Symmetry Breaking in a Two-dimensional Rydberg Ar- ray (2022), arXiv:2207.12930 [cond-mat, physics:physics, physics:quant-ph]

  76. [82]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, F. Machado, S. Chern, L. Leclerc, B. G´ ely, Y. T. Chew, D. Barredo, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Enhancing a many-body dipolar rydberg tweezer array with arbitrary local controls, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 263601 (2024)

  77. [83]

    Jaksch, J

    D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, P. Zoller, S. L. Rolston, R. Cˆ ot´ e, and M. D. Lukin, Fast quantum gates for neutral atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.85, 2208 (2000)

  78. [84]

    M. D. Lukin, M. Fleischhauer, R. Cote, L. M. Duan, D. Jaksch, J. I. Cirac, and P. Zoller, Dipole blockade and quantum information processing in mesoscopic atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 037901 (2001)

  79. [85]

    Ebadi, T

    S. Ebadi, T. T. Wang, H. Levine, A. Keesling, G. Se- meghini, A. Omran, D. Bluvstein, R. Samajdar, H. Pich- ler, W. W. Ho, S. Choi, S. Sachdev, M. Greiner, V. Vuleti´ c, and M. D. Lukin, Quantum phases of matter on a 256-atom programmable quantum simulator, Nature 595, 227–232 (2021)

  80. [86]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms, Science365, 775–780 (2019)

Showing first 80 references.