arxiv: 2604.22803 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-13 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci· physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

A Diamagnetic, Light-Driven Tesla Engine Based on a Mechanically Displaced, Magnetically Levitated Graphene Disk

Tian Tong , Feng Lin , Wei Zhang , Runjia Li , Xinxin Xing , Zhuochen Duan , Chunhui Xu , Bing Tu

show 6 more authors

Zhaoping Liu Xufeng Zhou Zhiming Wang Dong Liu Jonathan Hu Jiming Bao

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 15:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.optics

keywords diamagnetic Tesla enginegraphene disk levitationlight-driven rotationthermomagnetic torquediamagnetismmagnetic restoring force

0 comments

The pith

A laterally displaced levitated graphene disk rotates under light because its diamagnetic restoring force converts uneven heating into steady torque.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a graphene disk levitated above a magnet can be driven into continuous rotation by shifting it slightly sideways from its equilibrium position and then applying light. This offset creates a strong, position-dependent diamagnetic force that pulls the disk back while asymmetric heating from the light breaks rotational symmetry and produces net torque. Conventional edge-magnet designs fail for diamagnetic materials, but the offset approach yields stable speeds of 2000 rpm with laser illumination and 1000 rpm in sunlight. Adding vanes turns the disk into a gear that can propel a small graphene vehicle or couple energy to a second disk.

Core claim

By laterally displacing the levitated graphene disk from magnetic equilibrium, the resulting displacement-dependent diamagnetic restoring force, acting together with asymmetric local heating under light, produces continuous unidirectional rotation, enabling the first functional diamagnetic Tesla engine.

What carries the argument

The displacement-dependent diamagnetic restoring force on an off-center levitated graphene disk, which supplies the torque when combined with light-induced thermal asymmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The rotation is produced by the diamagnetic restoring force acting on asymmetrically heated parts of the disk rather than by air currents, thermal expansion, or mechanical artifacts.

What would settle it

A plot of rotation speed versus lateral offset that shows zero speed at zero offset, or the same experiment repeated in vacuum with no change in speed.

read the original abstract

Ferromagnetic materials are widely used in Tesla thermomagnetic engines, whereas diamagnetic counterparts have remained unexplored. Here, we demonstrate the first diamagnetic Tesla engine by exploiting the strong diamagnetism of graphene. A graphene disk, fabricated by stacking graphene sheets, serves as the engine wheel. We first show that the conventional Tesla engine design using a permanent magnet placed near the disk edge to create unbalanced thermomagnetic forces under asymmetric local heating fails to generate rotation. We achieve stable operation by laterally displacing the levitated disk from equilibrium, creating a strong restoring force that drives rotation under light excitation. Calculations and measurements establish the displacement-dependent force, with an optimal offset of 0.8 mm yielding speeds up to 2000 rpm under laser heating and 1000 rpm under direct sunlight. Adding vanes allows the disk to function as a gear, powering a graphene vehicle and transferring energy to another disk. This design utilizes the strong and anisotropic diamagnetism of graphene and paves the way for light-powered sensors, actuators, and micro-vehicles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper demonstrates a working light-driven diamagnetic engine with a laterally offset graphene disk reaching 2000 rpm, but the mechanism claim rests on incomplete controls.

read the letter

The core result here is a functional diamagnetic Tesla engine: a levitated graphene disk rotates stably only when displaced 0.8 mm from the magnet equilibrium, producing up to 2000 rpm under laser and 1000 rpm under sunlight. The conventional edge-magnet geometry yields nothing, which they document. They supply force calculations tied to the offset and show the disk can drive a small vehicle when vanes are added. That combination of adaptation, measurement, and extension to a gear-like setup is the actual novelty and the part that holds up on the evidence given in the abstract and description.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to demonstrate the first diamagnetic Tesla engine using a levitated graphene disk. It reports that a conventional permanent-magnet placement near the disk edge fails to produce rotation under asymmetric local heating, whereas laterally displacing the disk from equilibrium by an optimal 0.8 mm offset generates a strong restoring diamagnetic force that drives stable rotation, reaching 2000 rpm under laser heating and 1000 rpm under direct sunlight. The design is extended by adding vanes so the disk functions as a gear, powering a graphene vehicle and transferring energy to a second disk.

Significance. If the observed rotation is confirmed to arise specifically from the offset-dependent diamagnetic restoring force acting on the light-induced temperature gradient, this would constitute a novel experimental demonstration of a light-driven engine based on diamagnetic materials rather than ferromagnetic ones. The dual demonstration under laser and sunlight, together with the gear-extension result, would open pathways for light-powered micro-actuators, sensors, and vehicles that exploit graphene's strong, anisotropic diamagnetism.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: the central experimental claim that the offset geometry yields stable rotation at 2000 rpm (laser) and 1000 rpm (sunlight) while the conventional edge-magnet geometry produces none is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and implied results) provides no error bars, measurement protocol, or statistical basis for the reported speeds.
[Abstract] Abstract and implied experimental section: the manuscript states that the conventional edge-magnet design fails while the 0.8 mm offset succeeds, but reports no quantitative comparison of observed torque versus the calculated diamagnetic restoring force at that offset, nor explicit null tests (uniform illumination, vacuum/helium environment, or fixed-disk torque measurements) to exclude air currents or differential thermal expansion.
[Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'calculations and measurements establish the displacement-dependent force' is presented without reference to any specific equation, table, or figure showing the force-versus-offset curve or the torque balance that would produce the stated rpm values, leaving the mechanistic link unverified.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The manuscript would benefit from a brief definition or citation of the original Tesla thermomagnetic engine concept to orient readers outside the subfield.
[Full text] Supplementary material should include raw rotation-speed time series or video data to permit independent verification of the reported rpm values.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central experimental claim that the offset geometry yields stable rotation at 2000 rpm (laser) and 1000 rpm (sunlight) while the conventional edge-magnet geometry produces none is load-bearing, yet the abstract (and implied results) provides no error bars, measurement protocol, or statistical basis for the reported speeds.

Authors: We agree that the abstract, owing to length constraints, omits these details. The full manuscript describes the protocol (high-speed video recording of the disk edge with frame-by-frame RPM extraction) in the experimental methods, and the results section reports data from repeated trials with standard-deviation error bars shown in the relevant figures. We will revise the abstract to include a brief statement of the statistical basis and measurement approach. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and implied experimental section: the manuscript states that the conventional edge-magnet design fails while the 0.8 mm offset succeeds, but reports no quantitative comparison of observed torque versus the calculated diamagnetic restoring force at that offset, nor explicit null tests (uniform illumination, vacuum/helium environment, or fixed-disk torque measurements) to exclude air currents or differential thermal expansion.

Authors: The manuscript presents calculations of the diamagnetic restoring force versus lateral offset (derived from graphene susceptibility and the measured field gradient) together with levitation-height data that confirm the force magnitude at 0.8 mm. We acknowledge, however, that an explicit torque-balance calculation linking this force to the observed RPM and a dedicated description of null tests are not stated with sufficient prominence. We will add a quantitative comparison of the force-derived torque to the inertial torque at the reported speeds and will expand the text to describe the uniform-illumination control (no net rotation) and any auxiliary measurements performed to address possible air-current or thermal-expansion artifacts. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that 'calculations and measurements establish the displacement-dependent force' is presented without reference to any specific equation, table, or figure showing the force-versus-offset curve or the torque balance that would produce the stated rpm values, leaving the mechanistic link unverified.

Authors: We will revise the abstract to insert explicit cross-references to the supporting material, for example by stating that the displacement-dependent force is shown in Eq. (X) and Fig. (Y), with the torque balance that accounts for the observed RPM values detailed in Fig. (Z). This will make the mechanistic connection immediately traceable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental demonstration relies on independent measurements and first-principles force calculations

full rationale

The manuscript presents a physical experiment in which a graphene disk is levitated, laterally offset, and driven by localized light heating. Rotation speeds are directly measured (up to 2000 rpm laser, 1000 rpm sunlight), and the displacement-dependent restoring force is established by separate calculations grounded in known diamagnetic susceptibility of graphene together with independent force measurements. No derivation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-citation chain carries the central claim, and no ansatz or uniqueness theorem is smuggled in. The work is therefore self-contained against external physical benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on established domain knowledge of graphene diamagnetism and magnetic levitation, with one experimentally selected parameter for optimal performance.

free parameters (1)

optimal lateral offset = 0.8 mm
The 0.8 mm displacement is presented as yielding peak speeds and appears selected from experimental trials.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Graphene exhibits strong and anisotropic diamagnetism that enables stable magnetic levitation and generates a displacement-dependent restoring force.
Invoked to explain both levitation and the mechanism for rotation under asymmetric heating.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5539 in / 1259 out tokens · 40091 ms · 2026-05-10T15:05:34.728032+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

20 extracted references

[1]

Karle, The thermomagnetic Curie-motor for the conversion of heat into mechanical energy

A. Karle, The thermomagnetic Curie-motor for the conversion of heat into mechanical energy. International journal of thermal sciences 40, 834-842 (2001)

2001
[2]

M. Li, Y . Wang, A. Chen, A. Naidu, B.S. Napier, W. Li, C.L. Rodriguez, S.A. Crooker, F.G. Omenetto, Flexible magnetic composites for light -controlled actuation and interfaces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 8119-8124 (2018)

2018
[3]

R. A. Kishore, S. Priya, A review on design and performance of thermomagnetic devices. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 81, 33-44 (2018)

2018
[4]

H. Qu, J. Ren, H. Wen, H. Liu, G. Liu, L. Wan, Gadolinium-Based Curie Triboelectric Nanogenerator for Thermal Gradient Energy Harvesting at Gas-Liquid Interface. Nano Energy 140, 111003 (2025)

2025
[5]

M. U. Mehmood, Zeeshan, Y . Kim, R. Ahmed, J. Lee, W. Chun, Design and operation of a thermomagnetic engine for the exploitation of low‐grade thermal energy. International Journal of Energy Research 45, 15298-15311 (2021)

2021
[6]

L. Liu, F. Lin, C. Qin, H. Zhong, T. Tong, R. Li, H. Yan, Q. Wang, P. Li, D. Liu, C. Wang, J. Bao, Z. Wang, Spinning a Liquid Wheel and Driving Surface Thermomagnetic Convection with Light. Advanced Materials 36, 2306756 (2024)

2024
[7]

Sepioni, R.R

M. Sepioni, R.R. Nair, S. Rablen, J. Narayanan, F. Tuna, R. Winpenny, A.K. Geim, I.V . Grigorieva, Limits on Intrinsic Magnetism in Graphene. Physical Review Letters 105, 207205 (2010)

2010
[8]

Z. L. Li, L.L. Chen, S. Meng, L.W. Guo, J. Huang, Y . Liu, W.J. Wang, X.L. Chen, Field and temperature depe ndence of intrinsic diamagnetism in graphene: Theory and experiment. Physical Review B 91, 094429 (2015)

2015
[9]

F. Lin, Z. Zhu, X. Zhou, W. Qiu, C. Niu, J. Hu, K. Dahal, Y . Wang, Z. Zhao, Z. Ren, D. Litvinov, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Bao, Orientation control of gr aphene flakes by magnetic field: broad device applications of macroscopically aligned graphene. Advanced Materials 29, 1604453 (2017)

2017
[10]

F. Lin, G. Yang, C. Niu, Y . Wang, Z. Zhu, H. Luo, C. Dai, D. Mayerich, Y . Hu, J. Hu, X. Zhou, Z. Liu, Z. Wang, J. Bao, Planar alignment of graphene sheets by a rotating Page 17 of 17 17 magnetic field for full exploitation of graphene as a 2D material. Advanced Functional Materials 28, 1805255 (2018)

2018
[11]

F. Lin, C. Niu, J. Hu, Z. Wang, J. Bao, Graphene Diamagnetism: Levitation, transport, rotation, and orientation alignment of graphene flakes in a magnetic field. IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine 14, 14-22 (2019)

2019
[12]

A. K. Geim, K. S. Novoselov, The rise of graphene. Nature Materials 6, 183-191 (2007)

2007
[13]

C. Niu, F. Lin, Z. M. Wang, J. Bao, J. Hu, Graphene levitation and orientation control using a magnetic field. Journal of Applied Physics 123, 044302 (2018)

2018
[14]

C. F. Zhou, F. Lin, Y .L. Tang, Y . Liu, X. Luo, Y . Qi, S.Z. Xu, Y .A. Qiu, H.Z. Yan, X. Tong, A. Neogi, Z.P. Liu, X.F. Zhou, C. Wang, J.M. Bao, Z.M. Wang, Highly effective electromagnetic interference shielding composites with solvent -dispersed uniformly aligned graphene nanosheets enabled by strong intrinsic diamagnetism under magnetic field. Material...

2023
[15]

Simon, L

M. Simon, L. Heflinger, A. Geim, Diamagnetically stabilized magnet levitation. American journal of physics 69, 702-713 (2001)

2001
[16]

Huang, P

J. Huang, P. Zhao, C. Zhang, J. Xie, N. Xia, J. Fu, Stable levitation of pyrolytic graphite above circular magnet arrays. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 58, 1-11 (2022)

2022
[17]

Kim , S.L

D. Kim , S.L. Tian, B. Calderoni, C.S. Jachimska, J. Downes, J. Twamley , A magnetically levitated conducting rotor with ultra-low rotational damping circumventing eddy loss. Communications Physics 8, 381 (2025)

2025
[18]

Nguyen, S

J. Nguyen, S. Contera, I. L. García, Magneto- electrical orientation of lipid -coated graphitic micro-particles in solution. RSC advances 6, 46643-46653 (2016)

2016
[19]

Backholm, O

M. Backholm, O. Bäumchen, Micropipette force sensors for in vivo force measurements on single cells and multicellular microorganisms. Nature Protocols 14, 594-615 (2019)

2019
[20]

Lin, A.N

F. Lin, A.N. Quraishy, R.J. Li, G. Yang, M. Mohebinia, T. Tong, Y . Qiu, T. Vishal, J.Y . Zhao, W. Zhang, H. Zhong, H. Zhang, C.F. Zhou, X. Tong, P. Yu, J. Hu, S.C. Dong, D. Liu, Z.M. Wang, J.R. Schaibley, J.M. Bao, Molding, patterning and driving liquids with light. Materials Today 51, 48-55 (2021)

2021