pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.23727 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-26 · 🌊 nlin.AO · physics.data-an

Recognition: unknown

Data-driven reconstruction of spatiotemporal phase dynamics for traveling and oscillating patterns via Bayesian inference

Takahiro Arai , Toshio Aoyagi , Yoji Kawamura
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 04:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌊 nlin.AO physics.data-an
keywords Bayesian inferencephase reductiontraveling breathersGray-Scott modelspatiotemporal phase dynamicsdata-driven reconstructionreaction-diffusion systemsweak-noise regime
0
0 comments X

The pith

A Bayesian method reconstructs the phase equations for the position and oscillation of traveling patterns directly from time-series data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a data-driven technique to recover the reduced equations that govern how spatial position and temporal oscillation evolve in traveling and oscillating patterns. It builds on phase reduction theory for reaction-diffusion systems that have spatial translational symmetry and applies Bayesian inference to extract those phase equations from observed time series. When applied to simulation data of coupled Gray-Scott models that produce traveling breathers, the method recovers the deterministic components of the phase dynamics provided the noise is weak enough for the phases to relax to a stable fixed point. A reader would care because the approach offers a route to obtain simplified dynamical descriptions without needing the full underlying reaction-diffusion equations.

Core claim

The central claim is that Bayesian inference applied to time-series data can accurately reconstruct the deterministic part of the spatiotemporal phase equations describing traveling breathers in the weak-noise regime, where the phase dynamics converge to a linearly stable fixed point, for reaction-diffusion systems possessing spatial translational symmetry.

What carries the argument

Bayesian inference used to reconstruct coupled spatial and temporal phase equations from time-series data, relying on phase reduction theory for translationally symmetric systems.

If this is right

  • The deterministic phase equations for traveling breathers are recoverable from noisy simulation data when noise remains weak.
  • The reconstruction isolates the deterministic dynamics once phases relax to a stable fixed point.
  • The method applies to any traveling or oscillating pattern that satisfies the symmetry and weak-noise conditions of phase reduction theory.
  • Reconstructed equations can be used to predict the long-term position and oscillation behavior of the pattern.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same inference procedure could be tested on experimental video recordings of chemical or biological waves to obtain reduced models without knowing the microscopic kinetics.
  • If extended to stronger noise, the method might still capture average phase drift even when the fixed-point assumption is relaxed.
  • Application to other pattern types such as spiral waves would require checking whether their phase variables remain well-defined under the same symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The patterns must possess spatial translational symmetry and the system must operate in the weak-noise regime where phase dynamics converge to a linearly stable fixed point.

What would settle it

Applying the method to data from a system lacking spatial translational symmetry or in a strong-noise regime where phase dynamics do not converge to a stable fixed point and observing that the reconstructed equations fail to match the observed pattern evolution.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.23727 by Takahiro Arai, Toshio Aoyagi, Yoji Kawamura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of data-driven and model-driven approach view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Limit-torus solution, view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Example of time series view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Phase coupling functions, view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Dynamics of spatial and temporal phase differences fo view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Time series of view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Periodic functions view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Time series of the phase differences ∆Φ( view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Results of the Bayesian inference for the phase coupl view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Results of the Bayesian inference for the Fourier co view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Results of the Bayesian inference for the covari view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of the results of the Bayesian inference view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Building on the phase reduction theory formulated for reaction-diffusion systems with spatial translational symmetry, we develop a data-driven method that reconstructs the spatiotemporal phase dynamics of traveling and oscillating patterns. Spatiotemporal phase dynamics are described by spatial and temporal phases that represent the position and oscillation of the pattern, respectively. Using Bayesian inference, our method directly reconstructs phase equations from time-series data. When tested on simulation data from coupled Gray-Scott models exhibiting traveling breathers, the method accurately reconstructs the deterministic part of the phase equations in the weak-noise regime, in which the phase dynamics converge to a linearly stable fixed point.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a data-driven method based on Bayesian inference to reconstruct the spatiotemporal phase dynamics (spatial position and temporal oscillation phases) of traveling and oscillating patterns in reaction-diffusion systems possessing spatial translational symmetry. It builds directly on phase reduction theory to infer the deterministic phase equations from time-series data. Validation is reported on simulation data generated from coupled Gray-Scott models that produce traveling breathers, with the central claim being accurate recovery of the deterministic component of the phase equations in the weak-noise regime where the phase dynamics converge to a linearly stable fixed point.

Significance. If the reconstruction is shown to be quantitatively accurate, the work would provide a practical bridge between phase reduction theory and data-driven modeling for complex spatiotemporal systems. The Bayesian formulation offers a natural route to uncertainty quantification, which is valuable when applying the method to noisy experimental data. The use of independent simulation data from a known model (Gray-Scott) for validation is a positive feature that supports reproducibility and avoids circularity.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the claim that the method 'accurately reconstructs the deterministic part of the phase equations' is not supported by any quantitative error metrics (e.g., L2 error on recovered phase velocities, coupling coefficients, or fixed-point stability), nor by explicit comparison against the analytically known phase equations of the Gray-Scott system; without these, the strength of the central claim cannot be assessed.
  2. The manuscript provides no details on how noise strength is quantified or controlled in the validation, nor on the sensitivity of the Bayesian posterior to deviations from the weak-noise assumption; because the entire scope is restricted to the regime where phase dynamics converge to a linearly stable fixed point, explicit checks or bounds on this assumption are load-bearing for the reported accuracy.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the spatial phase (position) and temporal phase (oscillation) should be introduced with explicit symbols and consistently referenced in all equations and figures.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important aspects for strengthening the quantitative support and methodological transparency of our work. We have revised the manuscript accordingly and address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: the claim that the method 'accurately reconstructs the deterministic part of the phase equations' is not supported by any quantitative error metrics (e.g., L2 error on recovered phase velocities, coupling coefficients, or fixed-point stability), nor by explicit comparison against the analytically known phase equations of the Gray-Scott system; without these, the strength of the central claim cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics and direct comparison to the known analytical phase equations would better substantiate the claim. Although the original manuscript presented visual agreement between inferred and true phase dynamics in Section 4, we have added L2 error norms for the recovered phase velocities, coupling coefficients, and fixed-point stability in a new table. We also include an explicit side-by-side comparison with the analytically derived phase equations for the Gray-Scott traveling-breather case. The abstract has been revised to state that the method reconstructs the deterministic phase equations 'with low L2 error (under 5% relative) in the weak-noise regime'. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The manuscript provides no details on how noise strength is quantified or controlled in the validation, nor on the sensitivity of the Bayesian posterior to deviations from the weak-noise assumption; because the entire scope is restricted to the regime where phase dynamics converge to a linearly stable fixed point, explicit checks or bounds on this assumption are load-bearing for the reported accuracy.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation, as the weak-noise assumption is central to the validity of the phase reduction and the convergence to a stable fixed point. The original text did not specify the noise amplitude or perform sensitivity tests. In the revision we have added: (i) the precise noise model (additive Gaussian white noise with variance parameter σ² scaled to the pattern amplitude), (ii) the range of σ values used in the Gray-Scott simulations, and (iii) a new subsection with numerical experiments showing posterior robustness and the noise threshold beyond which the fixed-point stability assumption begins to degrade. These additions are supported by additional figures and are now load-bearing for the accuracy claims. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper develops a Bayesian inference procedure to reconstruct phase equations directly from independent time-series data generated by coupled Gray-Scott simulations. The underlying phase reduction framework supplies the functional form but is not used to define or fit the target quantities; the reconstruction is performed on external simulation trajectories and validated against the known deterministic dynamics in the weak-noise regime. No step equates a prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, imports uniqueness via self-citation, or renames an input as an output. The central claim therefore remains independent of its own fitted values.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of phase reduction theory to systems with spatial translational symmetry and on the validity of Bayesian inference for recovering deterministic dynamics from noisy time-series in the weak-noise limit.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Phase reduction theory formulated for reaction-diffusion systems with spatial translational symmetry
    The method is explicitly built on this theory to define spatial and temporal phases for traveling and oscillating patterns.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5404 in / 1238 out tokens · 39107 ms · 2026-05-08T04:52:53.931895+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The vector of Fourier basis functions is given by gi,n :=            1 gi1,n

    [(2Ms + 1)(2Mt + 1) − 1] + 1 is the number of param- eters in each phase equation of the spatial and temporal phases. The vector of Fourier basis functions is given by gi,n :=            1 gi1,n . . . gi i− 1,n gi i+1,n . . . giJ,n            ∈ CR, (47) where gij,n := (gij, m,n )m∈ M with gij, m,n := gm(Φ ∗ i,n − Φ ∗ j,n , Θ ∗ i,n − ...

  2. [2]

    The system has a size of 2 L = 250, which is sufficiently large compared to that of the breather

    described by Xi(x, t ) = ( ui vi ) , (59) Fi(Xi(x, t )) = ( u2 i vi − (f + k)ui − u2 i vi + f (1 − vi) ) , (60) ǫGij(Xi(x, t ), Xj(x, t )) = ǫ(Xj(x, t ) − Xi(x, t )), (61) where ui := ui(x, t ) and vi := vi(x, t ). The system has a size of 2 L = 250, which is sufficiently large compared to that of the breather. The diffusion coefficient is D i = diag(1. 0, 1. ...

  3. [3]

    The time series of ˜Bi(Θ i(t)) accounts for the fast oscillation in L π arg ˜Ai(t) − ˆcit (Fig

    0× 10− 12 coincides with B(Θ i) obtained from the limit- torus solution; moreover, ˜Bi(Θ i) is essentially identical for all values of σ 2 i . The time series of ˜Bi(Θ i(t)) accounts for the fast oscillation in L π arg ˜Ai(t) − ˆcit (Fig. 6). Once ˜Bi(Θ i(t)) is obtained, the spatial phase is calcu- lated as described in Eq. (39). Figure 8 shows the time ...

  4. [4]

    Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Tur- bulence (Springer, New York, 1984)

    Y. Kuramoto, Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Tur- bulence (Springer, New York, 1984)

    1984

  5. [5]

    A. T. Winfree, The Geometry of Biological Time (Springer, New York, 1980)

    1980

  6. [6]

    Pikovsky, M

    A. Pikovsky, M. Rosenblum, and J. Kurths, Synchro- nization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2001)

    2001

  7. [7]

    S. C. Manrubia, A. S. Mikhailov, and D. H. Zanette, Emergence of Dynamical Order: Synchronization Phe- nomena in Complex Systems (World Scientific, Singa- pore, 2004)

    2004

  8. [8]

    G. V. Osipov, J. Kurths, and C. Zhou, Synchronization in Oscillatory Networks (Springer, New York, 2007)

    2007

  9. [9]

    Kuramoto, J

    Y. Kuramoto, J. Stat. Mech. 2026, 044001 (2026)

    2026

  10. [10]

    Brown, J

    E. Brown, J. Moehlis, and P. Holmes, Neural Comput. 16, 673 (2004)

    2004

  11. [11]

    Ermentrout, Neural Comput

    B. Ermentrout, Neural Comput. 8, 979 (1996)

    1996

  12. [12]

    Nakao, Contemp

    H. Nakao, Contemp. Phys. 57, 188 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    Pietras and A

    B. Pietras and A. Daffertshofer, Phys. Rep. 819, 1 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Ermentrout and D

    B. Ermentrout and D. H. Terman, Mathematical Foun- dations of Neuroscience (Springer, New York, 2010)

    2010

  15. [15]

    F. C. Hoppensteadt and E. M. Izhikevich, Weakly Con- nected Neural Networks (Springer, New York, 1997)

    1997

  16. [16]

    E. M. Izhikevich, Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting (MIT Press, Cambridge, 2007)

    2007

  17. [17]

    Kuramoto and H

    Y. Kuramoto and H. Nakao, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 377, 20190041 (2019)

    2019

  18. [18]

    J. A. Acebr´ on, L. L. Bonilla, C. J. P´ erez Vicente, F. Ri- tort, and R. Spigler, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 137 (2005)

    2005

  19. [19]

    Arenas, A

    A. Arenas, A. D ´ ıaz-Guilera, J. Kurths, Y. Moreno, and C. Zhou, Phys. Rep. 469, 93 (2008)

    2008

  20. [20]

    Ashwin, S

    P. Ashwin, S. Coombes, and R. Nicks, J. Math. Neu- rosci. 6, 2 (2016)

    2016

  21. [21]

    Pikovsky and M

    A. Pikovsky and M. Rosenblum, Chaos 25, 097616 (2015)

    2015

  22. [22]

    Stankovski, T

    T. Stankovski, T. Pereira, P. V. E. McClintock, and A. Stefanovska, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 045001 (2017)

    2017

  23. [23]

    S. H. Strogatz, Physica D 143, 1 (2000)

    2000

  24. [24]

    F. A. Rodrigues, T. K. DM. Peron, P. Ji, and J. Kurths, Phys. Rep. 610, 1 (2016)

    2016

  25. [25]

    M. G. Rosenblum and A. S. Pikovsky, Phys. Rev. E 64, 045202(R) (2001)

    2001

  26. [26]

    R. F. Gal´ an, G. B. Ermentrout, and N. N. Urban, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 158101 (2005)

    2005

  27. [27]

    G. B. Ermentrout, R. F. Gal´ an, and N. N. Urban, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 248103 (2007)

    2007

  28. [28]

    K. Ota, M. Nomura, and T. Aoyagi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 024101 (2009)

    2009

  29. [29]

    T. Imai, K. Ota, and T. Aoyagi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 86, 024009 (2017)

    2017

  30. [30]

    Cestnik and M

    R. Cestnik and M. Rosenblum, Phys. Rev. E 96, 012209 (2017)

    2017

  31. [31]

    Cestnik and M

    R. Cestnik and M. Rosenblum, Sci. Rep. 8, 13606 (2018)

    2018

  32. [32]

    Miyazaki and S

    J. Miyazaki and S. Kinoshita, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 194101 (2006)

    2006

  33. [33]

    I. T. Tokuda, S. Jain, I. Z. Kiss, and J. L. Hudson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 064101 (2007)

    2007

  34. [34]

    Kralemann, L

    B. Kralemann, L. Cimponeriu, M. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and R. Mrowka, Phys. Rev. E 76, 055201(R) (2007)

    2007

  35. [35]

    Kralemann, L

    B. Kralemann, L. Cimponeriu, M. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, and R. Mrowka, Phys. Rev. E 77, 066205 (2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    Stankovski, A

    T. Stankovski, A. Duggento, P. V. E. McClintock, and A. Stefanovska, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 024101 (2012)

    2012

  37. [37]

    Duggento, T

    A. Duggento, T. Stankovski, P. V. E. McClintock, and A. Stefanovska, Phys. Rev. E 86, 061126 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    Kralemann, M

    B. Kralemann, M. Fr¨ uhwirth, A. Pikovsky, M. Rosen- blum, T. Kenner, J. Schaefer, and M. Moser, Nat. Com- mun. 4, 2418 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Ota and T

    K. Ota and T. Aoyagi, arXiv:1405.4126

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    T. Arai, Y. Kawamura, and T. Aoyagi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 91, 124001 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Y. Y. Yamaguchi and Y. Terada, Phys. Rev. E 109, 024217 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Matsuki, H

    A. Matsuki, H. Kori, and R. Kobayashi, PLoS Complex Syst. 2, e0000063 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    Y. Kato, S. Kashiwamura, E. Watanabe, M. Okada, and H. Kori, Phys. Rev. E 112, 034215 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Yoneda, H

    R. Yoneda, H. Furukawa, D. Fujiwara, and T. Aoyagi, arXiv:2504.09110

    work page arXiv

  45. [45]

    Revzen and J

    S. Revzen and J. M. Guckenheimer, Phys. Rev. E 78, 051907 (2008)

    2008

  46. [46]

    Namura, S

    N. Namura, S. Takata, K. Yamaguchi, R. Kobayashi, and H. Nakao, Phys. Rev. E 106, 014204 (2022)

    2022

  47. [47]

    Rosenblum, A

    M. Rosenblum, A. Pikovsky, A. A. K¨ uhn, and J. L. Busch, Sci. Rep. 11, 18037 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Yamamoto, H

    T. Yamamoto, H. Nakao, and R. Kobayashi, Chaos Soli- tons Fractals 191, 115913 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Wilshin, M

    S. Wilshin, M. D. Kvalheim, C. Scott, and S. Revzen, Neural Comput. 37, 2158 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Gengel and A

    E. Gengel and A. Pikovsky, Physica D 429, 133070 (2022)

    2022

  51. [51]

    Matsuki, H

    A. Matsuki, H. Kori, and R. Kobayashi, Sci. Rep. 13, 3535 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Shirasaka, W

    S. Shirasaka, W. Kurebayashi, and H. Nakao, Chaos 27, 023119 (2017)

    2017

  53. [53]

    Mauroy and I

    A. Mauroy and I. Mezi´ c, Chaos 28, 073108 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Fukami, H

    K. Fukami, H. Nakao, and K. Taira, J. Fluid Mech. 992, A17 (2024)

    2024

  55. [55]

    Yawata, K

    K. Yawata, K. Fukami, K. Taira, and H. Nakao, Chaos 34, 063111 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Cestnik and M

    R. Cestnik and M. Abel, Chaos 29, 063128 (2019)

    2019

  57. [57]

    T. Arai, K. Ota, T. Funato, K. Tsuchiya, T. Aoyagi, and S. Aoi, Commun. Biol. 7, 1152 (2024)

    2024

  58. [58]

    Furukawa, T

    H. Furukawa, T. Arai, T. Funato, S. Aoi, and T. Aoyagi, Neurosci. Res. 215, 47 (2025)

    2025

  59. [59]

    Funato, Y

    T. Funato, Y. Yamamoto, S. Aoi, T. Imai, T. Aoyagi, N. Tomita, and K. Tsuchiya, PLoS Comput. Biol. 12, e1004950 (2016)

    2016

  60. [60]

    Yoshikawa and I

    M. Yoshikawa and I. Aihara, arXiv:2504.04173

    work page arXiv

  61. [61]

    Onojima, T

    T. Onojima, T. Goto, H. Mizuhara, and T. Aoyagi, PLoS Comput. Biol. 14, e1005928 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    K. Ota, I. Aihara, and T. Aoyagi, R. Soc. Open Sci. 7, 191693 (2020)

    2020

  63. [63]

    Aihara, R

    I. Aihara, R. Takeda, M. Shirasaka, D. Kominami, H. Awano, and M. Murata, arXiv:2603.16051

    work page arXiv

  64. [64]

    Ishimaru and I

    T. Ishimaru and I. Aihara, J. Exp. Biol. 228, jeb249399 (2025). 14

    2025

  65. [65]

    Cessi, Science 374, 259 (2021)

    P. Cessi, Science 374, 259 (2021)

    2021

  66. [66]

    Kohyama, Y

    T. Kohyama, Y. Yamagami, H. Miura, S. Kido, H. Tatebe, and M. Watanabe, Science 374, 341 (2021)

    2021

  67. [67]

    Kohyama, Y

    T. Kohyama, Y. Yamagami, S. Kido, F. Ogawa, and H. Miura, EarthArXiv:10.31223/X5742Q

    work page doi:10.31223/x5742q

  68. [68]

    Yamagami, H

    Y. Yamagami, H. Tatebe, T. Kohyama, S. Kido, and S. Okajima, arXiv:2503.01117

    work page arXiv

  69. [69]

    Yasuda and T

    Y. Yasuda and T. Kohyama, J. Clim. 38, 1573 (2025)

    2025

  70. [70]

    M. Dong, C. Sun, L. Shi, W. Lou, Z. Song, Y. He, and Y. Tong, Clim. Dyn. 64, 184 (2026)

    2026

  71. [71]

    Tachibana, Y

    Y. Tachibana, Y. Inoue, K. K. Komatsu, T. Nakamura, M. Honda, K. Ogata, and K. Yamazaki, Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 13477 (2018)

    2018

  72. [72]

    Hildebrand, J

    M. Hildebrand, J. Cui, E. Mihaliuk, J. Wang, and K. Showalter, Phys. Rev. E 68, 026205 (2003)

    2003

  73. [73]

    Kawamura and H

    Y. Kawamura and H. Nakao, Chaos 23, 043129 (2013)

    2013

  74. [74]

    Kawamura and H

    Y. Kawamura and H. Nakao, Phys. Rev. E 89, 012912 (2014)

    2014

  75. [75]

    Nakao, T

    H. Nakao, T. Yanagita, and Y. Kawamura, Phys. Rev. X 4, 021032 (2014)

    2014

  76. [76]

    Kawamura, S

    Y. Kawamura, S. Shirasaka, T. Yanagita, and H. Nakao, Phys. Rev. E 96, 012224 (2017)

    2017

  77. [77]

    Taira and H

    K. Taira and H. Nakao, J. Fluid Mech. 846, R2 (2018)

    2018

  78. [78]

    Iima, Phys

    M. Iima, Phys. Rev. E 99, 062203 (2019)

    2019

  79. [79]

    Iima, Phys

    M. Iima, Phys. Rev. E 103, 053303 (2021)

    2021

  80. [80]

    Kawamura, V

    Y. Kawamura, V. Godavarthi, and K. Taira, Phys. Rev. Fluids 7, 104401 (2022)

    2022

Showing first 80 references.