arxiv: 2604.24414 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph · physics.optics

Recognition: unknown

Vectorial Acoustic Multiplexed Holography

Yuan Tian , Hao Ge , Jiangpo Zheng , Xiujuan Zhang , Ming-Hui Lu , Yan-Feng Chen

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph physics.optics

keywords acoustic holographymetasurfaceparticle velocitymultiplexinginverse designpressure-velocity couplingvector field

0 comments

The pith

Particle velocity serves as an independent multiplexing channel for acoustic holography by designing metasurfaces that handle pressure-velocity coupling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that particle velocity components can function as practical multiplexing degrees of freedom in acoustic holography, even though pressure and velocity remain coupled through the Euler equation. A physics-informed inverse-design method creates binary metasurfaces that separate these fields for independent holographic reconstructions. Experiments confirm dual-channel operation on the in-plane velocities vx and vy, plus three-channel operation when pressure p is added, all with high fidelity and low crosstalk. A reader would care because the approach increases information capacity in sound waves without cutting spatial or spectral bandwidth.

Core claim

Encoding more information into wave fields is a central goal, but acoustic holography has been limited to pressure-only encoding because sound in fluids lacks naturally independent vector channels. Particle velocity can serve as a practical multiplexing degree of freedom despite the intrinsic pressure-velocity coupling. A physics-informed inverse-design approach that incorporates acoustic propagation and pressure-velocity coupling creates a binary metasurface for vector-field acoustic holographic multiplexing. Experiments demonstrate dual-channel multiplexing on vx and vy, and extend to three-channel multiplexing by incorporating p, with high-fidelity reconstruction and low cross-talk. This,

What carries the argument

The physics-informed inverse-design approach that incorporates acoustic propagation and pressure-velocity coupling to create a binary metasurface.

If this is right

Dual-channel multiplexing on the in-plane velocity components vx and vy is achieved with high-fidelity reconstruction.
Three-channel multiplexing is realized by adding the pressure field p while maintaining low crosstalk.
A new information dimension is added to acoustic holography without reducing spatial or spectral bandwidth.
The method enables broader forms of wave-based information encoding and multiplexed wave control.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same coupling-aware design strategy could be tested on out-of-plane velocity or other acoustic field quantities to increase channel count further.
The metasurface concept might transfer to related wave systems where fields are coupled by governing equations, such as certain elastic or electromagnetic cases.
Practical acoustic devices for imaging or communication could gain capacity by exploiting the demonstrated vector separation.

Load-bearing premise

The inverse-design method accurately captures the real pressure-velocity coupling and propagation effects inside the fabricated metasurface, without fabrication tolerances or unmodeled physics causing the intended field separation to fail.

What would settle it

Experimental measurements on the fabricated metasurface that show high crosstalk or low-fidelity reconstruction between the targeted vx, vy, and p channels would falsify the claim that the design achieves independent multiplexing.

read the original abstract

Encoding more information into wave fields is a central goal in imaging, communication, and wave control. Optical holography benefits from polarization multiplexing, but acoustic holography remains largely limited to pressure-only encoding because sound in fluids lacks naturally independent vector channels. Here, we show that particle velocity can serve as a practical multiplexing degree of freedom despite the intrinsic pressure-velocity coupling governed by the acoustic Euler equation. We develop a physics-informed inverse-design approach that incorporates acoustic propagation and pressure-velocity coupling to create a binary metasurface for vector-field acoustic holographic multiplexing. Experiments demonstrate dual-channel multiplexing on the in-plane velocity components v_x and v_y, and further extend to three-channel multiplexing by incorporating pressure p, with high-fidelity reconstruction and low cross-talk. This approach adds a new information dimension without reducing spatial or spectral bandwidth and enables broader forms of wave-based information encoding and multiplexed wave control.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper shows velocity components can be multiplexed in acoustic holography via one inverse-designed binary metasurface, with experiments claiming low crosstalk for two and three channels.

read the letter

Colleague, the main thing here is that particle velocity gives a workable extra multiplexing dimension for acoustic holography even though pressure and velocity are coupled by the Euler equation. The authors use a physics-informed inverse design to create a binary metasurface that separates v_x, v_y, and then p as independent channels, and they report experimental reconstructions with high fidelity and low crosstalk in both the dual-velocity and three-channel cases. This is new because earlier acoustic holography stayed with pressure-only encoding, and treating the velocity components as separate information channels with a single device is not in the referenced prior work. The approach keeps spatial and spectral bandwidth intact and stays practical with a binary pattern. The soft spot is the match between the simulated vector fields and the actual fabricated metasurface. Fabrication tolerances, material losses, or unmodeled near-field effects could couple the channels more than intended and raise crosstalk, even if the experiments claim low levels. More quantitative error bars and direct comparisons of measured versus simulated fields would make the claim tighter. This paper is for people working on acoustic metamaterials, holography, and wave-based information encoding. Readers who need concrete ways to add channels to sound fields without extra bandwidth will find the method useful. It deserves a serious referee because the experimental validation is present and the core logic does not rely on circular fitting. I would send it out for peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to develop a physics-informed inverse-design approach for a binary acoustic metasurface that incorporates acoustic propagation and the pressure-velocity coupling from the Euler equation. This enables experimental demonstration of dual-channel multiplexing on the in-plane velocity components v_x and v_y, extended to three-channel multiplexing by also incorporating pressure p, with high-fidelity reconstruction and low cross-talk.

Significance. If the results hold, the work is significant for extending acoustic holography beyond pressure-only encoding by treating particle velocity as an independent multiplexing degree of freedom despite intrinsic coupling. It adds an information dimension without reducing spatial or spectral bandwidth, with potential impact on imaging, communication, and wave control. The physics-informed design and experimental multi-channel demonstration are notable strengths.

major comments (2)

[Experimental Results] Experimental Results section: The central claim of high-fidelity reconstruction and low cross-talk for three-channel (v_x, v_y, p) multiplexing is supported only by qualitative statements in the abstract and results; no quantitative metrics (e.g., crosstalk ratios in dB, reconstruction RMSE with error bars, or direct measured-vs-simulated vector-field comparisons) are provided. This is load-bearing because any mismatch between the fabricated metasurface and the simulated pressure-velocity coupling would directly increase cross-talk via the same Euler relation the design exploits.
[Inverse-design method] Inverse-design method (Methods or §2): The optimization procedure is described as incorporating the full Euler-equation coupling and binary constraint, but no explicit equations, cost-function terms, or convergence criteria are given for how the velocity-pressure separation is enforced under realistic fabrication tolerances. Without these, it is unclear whether the design remains robust when unmodeled near-field effects or material losses are present in the physical device.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The phrases 'high-fidelity' and 'low cross-talk' are used without numerical thresholds or reference values; adding brief quantitative indicators would improve clarity.
[Figures] Figure captions: Several figures showing reconstructed fields lack scale bars, color-bar units, or direct side-by-side simulation-experiment comparisons, making it harder to assess fidelity visually.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of our work and for the constructive major comments. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Experimental Results section: The central claim of high-fidelity reconstruction and low cross-talk for three-channel (v_x, v_y, p) multiplexing is supported only by qualitative statements in the abstract and results; no quantitative metrics (e.g., crosstalk ratios in dB, reconstruction RMSE with error bars, or direct measured-vs-simulated vector-field comparisons) are provided. This is load-bearing because any mismatch between the fabricated metasurface and the simulated pressure-velocity coupling would directly increase cross-talk via the same Euler relation the design exploits.

Authors: We agree that providing quantitative metrics is essential for substantiating the claims. In the revised manuscript, we will include crosstalk ratios (in dB) between channels, reconstruction RMSE values with error bars from repeated measurements, and direct comparisons of measured versus simulated vector fields for p, v_x, and v_y. These will be presented in the Experimental Results section and the supplementary materials to demonstrate the fidelity and low crosstalk rigorously. revision: yes
Referee: Inverse-design method (Methods or §2): The optimization procedure is described as incorporating the full Euler-equation coupling and binary constraint, but no explicit equations, cost-function terms, or convergence criteria are given for how the velocity-pressure separation is enforced under realistic fabrication tolerances. Without these, it is unclear whether the design remains robust when unmodeled near-field effects or material losses are present in the physical device.

Authors: We appreciate this suggestion for greater transparency. The current Methods section outlines the physics-informed approach, but we will revise it to include the explicit optimization equations, the full cost function with terms for enforcing pressure-velocity separation, convergence criteria, and a discussion of robustness to fabrication tolerances, near-field effects, and material losses. This expanded description will clarify how the design maintains performance in the experimental setting. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: physics-informed inverse design uses Euler equation as independent input with experimental validation

full rationale

The derivation begins from the acoustic Euler equation (standard, externally known) to model pressure-velocity coupling and then performs inverse design of a binary metasurface. The target multiplexing of v_x, v_y, and p is not fitted to itself; the design solves a forward physics problem for independent channels. Experiments then measure reconstruction fidelity and cross-talk on the fabricated device. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, no self-definitional loop appears, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work. The central result (low cross-talk multiplexing) remains falsifiable by fabrication mismatch or measurement, keeping the chain non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard acoustic wave physics and computational optimization; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

binary metasurface pattern
The specific binary structure is obtained via inverse optimization to match target vector fields.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The acoustic Euler equation governs the intrinsic coupling between pressure and particle velocity in the fluid.
Explicitly incorporated into the physics-informed inverse-design to account for the coupling.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5458 in / 1208 out tokens · 67018 ms · 2026-05-07T17:26:28.841131+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references

[1]

An updatable holographic three-dimensional display

Tay S, Blanche P-A, Voorakaranam R, Tunç A V., Lin W, Rokutanda S, et al. An updatable holographic three-dimensional display. Nature 2008;451:694–8

2008
[2]

Holographic three -dimensional telepresence using large -area photorefractive polymer

Blanche P -A, Bablumian A, Voorakaranam R, Christenson C, Lin W, Gu T, et al. Holographic three -dimensional telepresence using large -area photorefractive polymer. Nature 2010;468:80–3

2010
[3]

A photophoretic-trap volumetric display

Smalley DE, Nygaard E, Squire K, Van Wagoner J, Rasmussen J, Gneiting S, et al. A photophoretic-trap volumetric display. Nature 2018;553:486–90

2018
[4]

Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data

Heanue JF, Bashaw MC, Hesselink L. Volume holographic storage and retrieval of digital data. Science 1994;265:749–52

1994
[5]

Photorefractive Materials for Nonvolatile Volume Holographic Data Storage

Hesselink L, Orlov SS, Liu A, Akella A, Lande D, Neurgaonkar RR. Photorefractive Materials for Nonvolatile Volume Holographic Data Storage. Science 1998;282:1089–94

1998
[6]

Addressable metasurfaces for dynamic holography and optical information encryption

Li J, Kamin S, Zheng G, Neubrech F, Zhang S, Liu N. Addressable metasurfaces for dynamic holography and optical information encryption. Sci Adv 2018;4:1–7

2018
[7]

Reprogrammable meta -hologram for optical encryption

Qu G, Yang W, Song Q, Liu Y, Qiu C -W, Han J, et al. Reprogrammable meta -hologram for optical encryption. Nat Commun 2020;11:5484

2020
[8]

A revolution in optical manipulation

Grier DG. A revolution in optical manipulation. Nature 2003;424:810–6

2003
[9]

Holographic Plasmonic Nanotweezers for Dynamic Trapping and Manipulation

Huft PR, Kolbow JD, Thweatt JT, Lindquist NC. Holographic Plasmonic Nanotweezers for Dynamic Trapping and Manipulation. Nano Lett 2017;17:7920–5

2017
[10]

Spatial multiplexing holographic combiner for glasses- free augmented reality

Shi J, Qiao W, Hua J, Li R, Chen L. Spatial multiplexing holographic combiner for glasses- free augmented reality. Nanophotonics 2020;9:3003–10

2020
[11]

Athermally photoreduced graphene oxides for three-dimensional holographic images

Li X, Ren H, Chen X, Liu J, Li Q, Li C, et al. Athermally photoreduced graphene oxides for three-dimensional holographic images. Nat Commun 2015;6:6984

2015
[12]

Multicolor 3D meta -holography by broadband plasmonic modulation

Li X, Chen L, Li Y, Zhang X, Pu M, Zhao Z, et al. Multicolor 3D meta -holography by broadband plasmonic modulation. Sci Adv 2016;2:1–6

2016
[13]

Holographic colour prints for enhanced optical security by combined phase and amplitude control

Lim KTP, Liu H, Liu Y, Yang JKW. Holographic colour prints for enhanced optical security by combined phase and amplitude control. Nat Commun 2019;10:1–8

2019
[14]

Metasurface orbital angular momentum holography

Ren H, Briere G, Fang X, Ni P, Sawant R, Hé ron S, et al. Metasurface orbital angular momentum holography. Nat Commun 2019;10:2986

2019
[15]

Orbital angular momentum holography for high-security encryption

Fang X, Ren H, Gu M. Orbital angular momentum holography for high-security encryption. Nat Photonics 2020;14:102–8

2020
[16]

Super -resolution orbital angular momentum holography

Shi Z, Wan Z, Zhan Z, Liu K, Liu Q, Fu X. Super -resolution orbital angular momentum holography. Nat Commun 2023;14:1–13

2023
[17]

Multichannel vectorial holographic display and encryption

Zhao R, Sain B, Wei Q, Tang C, Li X, Weiss T, et al. Multichannel vectorial holographic display and encryption. Light Sci Appl 2018;7:95

2018
[18]

Breaking the limitation of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise

Xiong B, Liu Y, Xu Y, Deng L, Chen C -W, Wang J -N, et al. Breaking the limitation of polarization multiplexing in optical metasurfaces with engineered noise. Science 2023;379:294–9

2023
[19]

Unlocking ultra -high holographic information capacity through nonorthogonal polarization multiplexing

Wang J, Chen J, Yu F, Chen R, Wang J, Zhao Z, et al. Unlocking ultra -high holographic information capacity through nonorthogonal polarization multiplexing. Nat Commun 2024;15:1–10

2024
[20]

Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials

Cummer SA, Christensen J, Alù A. Controlling sound with acoustic metamaterials. Nat Rev Mater 2016;1:16001

2016
[21]

Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects

Marzo A, Seah SA, Drinkwater BW, Sahoo DR, Long B, Subramanian S. Holographic acoustic elements for manipulation of levitated objects. Nat Commun 2015;6:8661

2015
[22]

Holographic direct sound printing

Derayatifar M, Habibi M, Bhat R, Packirisamy M. Holographic direct sound printing. Nat Commun 2024;15:6691

2024
[23]

Acoustic Holographic Cell Patterning in a Biocompatible Hydrogel

Ma Z, Holle AW, Melde K, Qiu T, Poeppel K, Kadiri VM, et al. Acoustic Holographic Cell Patterning in a Biocompatible Hydrogel. Adv Mater 2020;32:1–6

2020
[24]

Theoretical acoustics

Morse PM, Ingard KU. Theoretical acoustics. Princeton university press; 1986

1986
[25]

Holograms for acoustics

Melde K, Mark AG, Qiu T, Fischer P. Holograms for acoustics. Nature 2016;537:518–22

2016
[26]

Observation of acoustic spin

Shi C, Zhao R, Long Y, Yang S, Wang Y, Chen H, et al. Observation of acoustic spin. Natl Sci Rev 2019;6:707–12

2019
[27]

Realization of acoustic spin transport in metasurface waveguides

Long Y, Zhang D, Yang C, Ge J, Chen H, Ren J. Realization of acoustic spin transport in metasurface waveguides. Nat Commun 2020;11:4716

2020
[28]

Observation of Acoustic Skyrmions

Ge H, Xu XY, Liu L, Xu R, Lin ZK, Yu SY, et al. Observation of Acoustic Skyrmions. Phys Rev Lett 2021;127:144502

2021
[29]

Observation of localized acoustic skyrmions

Hu P, Wu HW, Sun WJ, Zhou N, Chen X, Yang YQ, et al. Observation of localized acoustic skyrmions. Appl Phys Lett 2023;122

2023
[30]

Acoustic holography using composite metasurfaces

Zhang J, Tian Y, Cheng Y, Liu X. Acoustic holography using composite metasurfaces. Appl Phys Lett 2020;116

2020
[31]

Acoustic metasurfaces

Assouar B, Liang B, Wu Y, Li Y, Cheng J-C, Jing Y. Acoustic metasurfaces. Nat Rev Mater 2018;3:460–72

2018
[32]

Coding Acoustic Metasurfaces

Xie B, Tang K, Cheng H, Liu Z, Chen S, Tian J. Coding Acoustic Metasurfaces. Adv Mater 2017;29:1–8

2017
[33]

Acoustic metasurfaces for scattering -free anomalous reflection and refraction

Dí az-Rubio A, Tretyakov SA. Acoustic metasurfaces for scattering -free anomalous reflection and refraction. Phys Rev B 2017;96:1–10

2017
[34]

Wavefront modulation and subwavelength diffractive acoustics with an acoustic metasurface

Xie Y, Wang W, Chen H, Konneker A, Popa B-I, Cummer SA. Wavefront modulation and subwavelength diffractive acoustics with an acoustic metasurface. Nat Commun 2014;5:5553

2014
[35]

Deep -subwavelength control of acoustic waves in an ultra-compact metasurface lens

Chen J, Xiao J, Lisevych D, Shakouri A, Fan Z. Deep -subwavelength control of acoustic waves in an ultra-compact metasurface lens. Nat Commun 2018;9:4920

2018
[36]

Reconfigurable dynamic acoustic holography with acoustically transparent and programmable metamaterial

Zhang M, Jin B, Hua Y, Zhu Z, Xu D, Fan Z, et al. Reconfigurable dynamic acoustic holography with acoustically transparent and programmable metamaterial. Nat Commun 2025;16:9126

2025
[37]

Orbital angular momentum - and frequency-dependent high -capacity encrypted hologram through multi -dimensional multiplexing acoustic metasurface

Zhou Y, Li F, Wu K, Wang W, Liu J, Liang B, et al. Orbital angular momentum - and frequency-dependent high -capacity encrypted hologram through multi -dimensional multiplexing acoustic metasurface. Nat Commun 2025;16:11692

2025
[38]

Accurate and real -time acoustic holography using super-resolution and physics combined deep learning

Zhong C, Sun Z, Li J, Jiang Y, Su H, Liu S. Accurate and real -time acoustic holography using super-resolution and physics combined deep learning. Appl Phys Lett 2025;126

2025
[39]

Non -convex optimization for inverse problem solving in computer-generated holography

Sui X, He Z, Chu D, Cao L. Non -convex optimization for inverse problem solving in computer-generated holography. Light Sci Appl 2024;13:158

2024
[40]

Full-colour 3D holographic augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides

Gopakumar M, Lee G-Y, Choi S, Chao B, Peng Y, Kim J, et al. Full-colour 3D holographic augmented-reality displays with metasurface waveguides. Nature 2024;629:791–7

2024
[41]

Multi -frequency acoustic hologram generation with a physics-enhanced deep neural network

Lin Q, Zhang R, Cai F, Chen Y, Ye J, Wang J, et al. Multi -frequency acoustic hologram generation with a physics-enhanced deep neural network. Ultrasonics 2023;132:106970

2023
[42]

Deep-Learning Computational Holography: A Review

Shimobaba T, Blinder D, Birnbaum T, Hoshi I, Shiomi H, Schelkens P, et al. Deep-Learning Computational Holography: A Review. Front Photonics 2022;3:1–16

2022
[43]

Deep learning in holography and coherent imaging

Rivenson Y, Wu Y, Ozcan A. Deep learning in holography and coherent imaging. Light Sci Appl 2019;8:85

2019