pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24713 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🧮 math.RT · math.NT

Recognition: unknown

On classical doubling method gamma factors for certain depth zero representations

Johannes Girsch , Elad Zelingher
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 17:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.RT math.NT
keywords doubling methodgamma factorsfinite groups of Lie typedepth zero representationsDeligne-Lusztig charactersclassical groupsmultiplicativity
0
0 comments X

The pith

A doubling method gamma factor for depth zero irreducible representations of classical finite groups of Lie type is multiplicative and has explicit Deligne-Lusztig formulas in the non-conjugate-dual case.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines a gamma factor using the doubling method for irreducible depth zero representations of classical finite groups of Lie type. It proves that the factor is multiplicative and derives explicit formulas from Deligne-Lusztig data when the representation is not of conjugate-dual type. The work also shows how this finite construction matches the local factors of Lapid-Rallis through depth zero supercuspidal representations of classical groups. A reader would care because the construction turns an abstract local invariant into something explicitly computable from known character data in the finite setting.

Core claim

Following Lapid-Rallis, we define and study an analogous doubling method gamma factor associated to irreducible representations of classical finite groups of Lie type. We prove that this gamma factor is multiplicative and use results of Yost-Wolff--Zelingher to give explicit formulas for it in terms of the Deligne-Lusztig data of the representation in the non-conjugate-dual character case. Finally, we relate our construction to the local construction of Lapid-Rallis via certain depth zero supercuspidal representations of classical groups.

What carries the argument

the doubling method gamma factor, defined via an integral representation adapted from the automorphic setting to finite groups of Lie type

If this is right

  • The gamma factor can be computed explicitly for any such representation using known values of Deligne-Lusztig characters.
  • Multiplicativity allows the factor for a product of representations to be obtained from the individual factors.
  • The relation to the p-adic local construction holds for all depth zero supercuspidal representations of classical groups.
  • The definition provides a uniform way to attach local invariants to these finite representations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same integral construction might be tested on non-depth-zero representations to see where it breaks.
  • Explicit formulas in the finite case could serve as a check for conjectural properties of gamma factors in the p-adic setting.
  • The multiplicativity property might extend to other families of representations once the conjugate-dual case is handled separately.

Load-bearing premise

The construction and explicit formulas assume the representations are irreducible and of depth zero so that Deligne-Lusztig theory applies directly in the non-conjugate-dual case without extra compatibility conditions.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the doubling integral for a concrete depth zero irreducible representation, such as a principal series representation of a small classical group, that fails to match the proposed Deligne-Lusztig formula would falsify the claim.

read the original abstract

Piatetski-Shapiro--Rallis discovered an integral representation construction, known as the doubling method, for the tensor product $L$-function of a cuspidal automorphic representation of $G \times \mathrm{GL}_1$, where $G$ is a classical group. Lapid--Rallis defined and studied the counterpart local factors. In this article, following Lapid--Rallis, we define and study an analogous doubling method gamma factor associated to irreducible representations of classical finite groups of Lie type. We prove that this gamma factor is multiplicative and use results of Yost-Wolff--Zelingher to give explicit formulas for it in terms of the Deligne--Lusztig data of the representation in the non-conjugate-dual character case. Finally, we relate our construction to the local construction of Lapid--Rallis via certain depth zero supercuspidal representations of classical groups.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper defines a finite-group analog of the Lapid-Rallis doubling-method gamma factor for irreducible depth-zero representations of classical groups of Lie type. It proves multiplicativity directly from the definition and, in the non-conjugate-dual case, obtains explicit formulas in terms of Deligne-Lusztig data by invoking the character formulas of Yost-Wolff-Zelingher. The construction is finally related to the p-adic local gamma factors via depth-zero supercuspidal lifts of the finite representations.

Significance. The work supplies a self-contained combinatorial model for gamma factors in the finite setting that is multiplicatively well-behaved and explicitly computable from Deligne-Lusztig parameters. The explicit link to the p-adic doubling construction for depth-zero supercuspidals offers a concrete test case for consistency between finite and p-adic local factors. These features make the results useful both for representation theory of finite groups of Lie type and for future comparisons with the Langlands-Shahidi or doubling-method factors in the p-adic case.

minor comments (3)
  1. §2.3: the precise normalization of the Whittaker model used in the definition of the gamma factor (equation (2.7)) should be stated explicitly, even if it follows the standard convention of the cited works.
  2. §4.2, after Theorem 4.3: the statement that the formula holds 'without additional compatibility conditions' would benefit from a one-sentence reminder of the precise hypothesis on the Deligne-Lusztig character that is inherited from Yost-Wolff-Zelingher.
  3. Table 1: the column headings for the finite and p-adic gamma factors are easily confused; adding a short parenthetical '(finite)' and '(p-adic)' would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in the derivation chain

full rationale

The paper defines the finite-group analog of the Lapid-Rallis doubling gamma factor directly from the external construction, proves multiplicativity from the definition without any reduction to fitted inputs or self-referential assumptions, and obtains explicit formulas in the non-conjugate-dual case by direct invocation of the independent Yost-Wolff-Zelingher character formulas on Deligne-Lusztig data. The relation to the p-adic local factor is restricted to depth-zero supercuspidal lifts and introduces no hidden compatibility conditions or self-citation loops that would force the central claims. All load-bearing steps remain self-contained within the finite setting or rest on externally verified prior theorems, with no self-definitional, ansatz-smuggling, or renaming patterns exhibited.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The construction relies on the existence of the doubling integral representation (imported from Lapid-Rallis) and on the classification of representations via Deligne-Lusztig theory; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The doubling method integral representation exists and produces a well-defined gamma factor for the finite-group setting.
    Invoked when defining the analogous gamma factor following Lapid-Rallis.
  • standard math Deligne-Lusztig data classify the relevant irreducible representations and allow explicit computation of the gamma factor in the non-conjugate-dual case.
    Used to obtain the explicit formulas via results of Yost-Wolff-Zelingher.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5454 in / 1583 out tokens · 56453 ms · 2026-05-07T17:24:02.739833+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Arthur.The endoscopic classification of representations, volume 61 ofAmerican Mathematical So- ciety Colloquium Publications

    J. Arthur.The endoscopic classification of representations, volume 61 ofAmerican Mathematical So- ciety Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2013. Orthogonal and symplectic groups. 52 54 JOHANNES GIRSCH AND ELAD ZELINGHER

    2013

  2. [2]

    Atobe, W

    H. Atobe, W. T. Gan, A. Ichino, T. Kaletha, A. M´ ınguez, and S. W. Shin. Local Intertwining Relations and Co-temperedA-packets of Classical Groups. 2024. arXiv:2410.13504. 52

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Aubert, P

    A.-M. Aubert, P. Baum, R. Plymen, and M. Solleveld. Depth and the local Langlands correspondence. InArbeitstagung Bonn 2013, volume 319 ofProgr. Math., pages 17–41. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham,

    2013

  4. [4]

    Aubert, J

    A.-M. Aubert, J. Michel, and R. Rouquier. Correspondance de Howe pour les groupes r´ eductifs sur les corps finis.Duke Math. J., 83(2):353–397, 1996. 44

    1996

  5. [5]

    I. N. Bernstein and A. V. Zelevinsky. Representations of the groupGL(n, F),whereFis a local non- Archimedean field.Uspehi Mat. Nauk, 31(3(189)):5–70, 1976. 2

    1976

  6. [6]

    I. N. Bernstein and A. V. Zelevinsky. Induced representations of reductivep-adic groups. I.Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 10(4):441–472, 1977. 2

    1977

  7. [7]

    C. J. Bushnell. Gauss sums and local constants for GL(N). InL-functions and arithmetic (Durham, 1989), volume 153 ofLondon Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., pages 61–73. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1991. 2

    1989

  8. [8]

    C. J. Bushnell and P. C. Kutzko.The admissible dual ofGL(N)via compact open subgroups, volume 129 ofAnnals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. 2

    1993

  9. [9]

    Y. Cai. Twisted doubling integrals for classical groups.Math. Z., 297(3-4):1075–1104, 2021. 4

    2021

  10. [10]

    Y. Cai, S. Friedberg, D. Ginzburg, and E. Kaplan. Doubling constructions and tensor productL- functions: the linear case.Invent. Math., 217(3):985–1068, 2019. 4

    2019

  11. [11]

    Y. Cai, S. Friedberg, D. Gourevitch, and E. Kaplan. The generalized doubling method: (k, c) models. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 151(7):2831–2845, 2023. 4

    2023

  12. [12]

    Y. Cai, S. Friedberg, and E. Kaplan. The generalized doubling method: local theory.Geom. Funct. Anal., 32(6):1233–1333, 2022. 4

    2022

  13. [13]

    Y. Cai, S. Friedberg, and E. Kaplan. Doubling constructions: global functoriality for non-generic cusp- idal representations.Ann. of Math. (2), 200(3):893–966, 2024. 4

    2024

  14. [14]

    Chang.Zeta functions attached to irreducible representations of classical groups over finite fields

    J. Chang.Zeta functions attached to irreducible representations of classical groups over finite fields. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1997. Thesis (Ph.D.)–Clark University. 2, 17, 25

    1997

  15. [15]

    R. C. Chen. Co-rank 1 Arithmetic Siegel–Weil IV: Analytic local-to-global, 2024. arXiv:2405.01429. 40

    work page arXiv 2024

  16. [16]

    P. Deligne. Les constantes des ´ equations fonctionnelles des fonctionsL. InModular functions of one variable, II (Proc. Internat. Summer School, Univ. Antwerp, Antwerp, 1972), volume Vol. 349 ofLecture Notes in Math., pages 501–597. Springer, Berlin-New York, 1973. 45, 46, 50

    1972

  17. [17]

    Disegni and Y

    D. Disegni and Y. Liu. Ap-adic arithmetic inner product formula.Invent. Math., 236(1):219–371, 2024. 1

    2024

  18. [18]

    J. Droschl. Proof of a conjecture of Kudla and Rallis on quotients of degenerate principal series.Adv. Math., 464:Paper No. 110145, 51, 2025. 17

    2025

  19. [19]

    Eischen, M

    E. Eischen, M. Harris, J. Li, and C. Skinner.p-adicL-functions for unitary groups.Forum Math. Pi, 8:e9, 160, 2020. 1

    2020

  20. [20]

    Elber and H

    N. Elber and H. Lheem. Intertwining Operators for Siegel Parabolics over Finite Fields. 2025. Preprint available athttps://dfoiler.github.io/umich-reu/intertwining.pdf. 9

    2025

  21. [21]

    W. T. Gan and A. Ichino. Formal degrees and local theta correspondence.Invent. Math., 195(3):509–672,

  22. [22]

    W. T. Gan, Y. Qiu, and S. Takeda. The regularized Siegel-Weil formula (the second term identity) and the Rallis inner product formula.Invent. Math., 198(3):739–831, 2014. 1

    2014

  23. [23]

    Gelbart, I

    S. Gelbart, I. Piatetski-Shapiro, and S. Rallis.Explicit constructions of automorphicL-functions, volume 1254 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987. 1, 15

    1987

  24. [24]

    S. I. Gel’fand. Representations of the full linear group over a finite field.Math. USSR Sb., 12(13):13–39,

  25. [25]

    J. Girsch. The doubling method in algebraic families.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (14):12561–12600,

  26. [26]

    J. Girsch. The Twisted Doubling Method in Algebraic Families. 2024. arXiv:2410.22525. 4

    work page arXiv 2024

  27. [27]

    Godement and H

    R. Godement and H. Jacquet.Zeta functions of simple algebras, volume Vol. 260 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1972. 1 DOUBLING METHOD FOR DEPTH ZERO REPRESENTATIONS 55

    1972

  28. [28]

    Gourevitch and E

    D. Gourevitch and E. Kaplan. Multiplicity one theorems for the generalized doubling method (with an appendix by Avraham Aizenbud and Dmitry Gourevitch).J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 25(8):3007–3092,

  29. [29]

    B. H. Gross and M. Reeder. Arithmetic invariants of discrete Langlands parameters.Duke Math. J., 154(3):431–508, 2010. 45, 46, 48

    2010

  30. [30]

    Harris, S

    M. Harris, S. S. Kudla, and W. J. Sweet. Theta dichotomy for unitary groups.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 9(4):941–1004, 1996. 1

    1996

  31. [31]

    Harris and R

    M. Harris and R. Taylor.The geometry and cohomology of some simple Shimura varieties, volume 151 ofAnnals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001. With an appendix by Vladimir G. Berkovich. 45, 52

    2001

  32. [32]

    Henniart

    G. Henniart. Une preuve simple des conjectures de Langlands pour GL(n) sur un corpsp-adique.Invent. Math., 139(2):439–455, 2000. 45, 52

    2000

  33. [33]

    Huppert and W

    B. Huppert and W. Willems. Bemerkungen zur modularen Darstellungstheorie. II. Darstellungen von Normalteilern.Arch. Math. (Basel), 26(5):486–496, 1975. 31

    1975

  34. [34]

    C. Jantzen. Tempered representations for classicalp-adic groups.Manuscripta Math., 145(3-4):319–387,

  35. [35]

    Jiang, Z

    D. Jiang, Z. Luo, and L. Zhang. Harmonic analysis and gamma functions on symplectic groups.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 295(1473):vii+89, 2024. 41

    2024

  36. [36]

    Kakuhama

    H. Kakuhama. On the local factors of irreducible representations of quaternionic unitary groups. Manuscripta Math., 163(1-2):57–86, 2020. 40

    2020

  37. [37]

    Kakuhama

    H. Kakuhama. Formal degrees and the local theta correspondence: the quaternionic case.Represent. Theory, 26:1192–1267, 2022. 40

    2022

  38. [38]

    J. Kim. Gamma factors of certain supercuspidal representations.Math. Ann., 317(4):751–781, 2000. 2, 3

    2000

  39. [39]

    T. Konno. A note on the Langlands classification and irreducibility of induced representations ofp-adic groups.Kyushu J. Math., 57(2):383–409, 2003. 2

    2003

  40. [40]

    Lansky and A

    J. Lansky and A. Raghuram. On the correspondence of representations between GL(n) and division algebras.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 131(5):1641–1648, 2003. 48

    2003

  41. [41]

    Lapid and M

    E. Lapid and M. Tadi´ c. Some results on reducibility of parabolic induction for classical groups.Amer. J. Math., 142(2):505–546, 2020. 2

    2020

  42. [42]

    E. M. Lapid and S. Rallis. On the local factors of representations of classical groups. InAutomorphic representations,L-functions and applications: progress and prospects, volume 11 ofOhio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ., pages 309–359. de Gruyter, Berlin, 2005. 2, 3, 25, 26, 33, 39, 40

    2005

  43. [43]

    Liu and Z

    D. Liu and Z. Wang. Descents of unipotent representations of finite unitary groups.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 373(6):4223–4253, 2020. 44

    2020

  44. [44]

    Liu and Z

    D. Liu and Z. Wang. Remarks on the theta correspondence over finite fields.Pacific J. Math., 306(2):587– 609, 2020. 44

    2020

  45. [45]

    Lust and S

    J. Lust and S. Stevens. On depth zero L-packets for classical groups.Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 121(5):1083–1120, 2020. 52, 53

    2020

  46. [46]

    I. G. Macdonald. Zeta functions attached to finite general linear groups.Math. Ann., 249(1):1–15, 1980. 50

    1980

  47. [47]

    M´ ınguez and V

    A. M´ ınguez and V. S´ echerre. Local transfer for quasi-split classical groups and congruences modℓ.J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), 27(12):5173–5234, 2025. With an appendix by Guy Henniart. 51

    2025

  48. [48]

    C. P. Mok. Endoscopic classification of representations of quasi-split unitary groups.Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 235(1108):vi+248, 2015. 52

    2015

  49. [49]

    Moy and G

    A. Moy and G. Prasad. Jacquet functors and unrefined minimalK-types.Comment. Math. Helv., 71(1):98–121, 1996. 48

    1996

  50. [50]

    S.-Y. Pan. Local theta correspondence of depth zero representations and theta dichotomy.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 54(4):793–845, 2002. 44

    2002

  51. [51]

    S.-Y. Pan. Generalized preservation principle in finite theta correspondence.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (1):382–422, 2024. 44

    2024

  52. [52]

    Piatetski-Shapiro and S

    I. Piatetski-Shapiro and S. Rallis.ϵfactor of representations of classical groups.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 83(13):4589–4593, 1986. 1, 3, 39, 40

    1986

  53. [53]

    D. Prasad. Notes on representations of finite groups of Lie type. 2014. arXiv:1404.0861. 30 56 JOHANNES GIRSCH AND ELAD ZELINGHER

    work page arXiv 2014

  54. [54]

    Prasad and A

    D. Prasad and A. Raghuram. Representation theory of GL(n) over non-Archimedean local fields. In School on Automorphic Forms onGL(n), volume 21 ofICTP Lect. Notes, pages 159–205. Abdus Salam Int. Cent. Theoret. Phys., Trieste, 2008. 48

    2008

  55. [55]

    Rallis and D

    S. Rallis and D. Soudry. Stability of the local gamma factor arising from the doubling method.Math. Ann., 333(2):291–313, 2005. 8, 18

    2005

  56. [56]

    Rallis and D

    S. Rallis and D. Soudry. On local gamma factors for orthogonal groups and unitary groups.Bull. Iranian Math. Soc., 43(4):387–403, 2017. 8

    2017

  57. [57]

    S. Stevens. The supercuspidal representations ofp-adic classical groups.Invent. Math., 172(2):289–352,

  58. [58]

    J. T. Tate. Fourier analysis in number fields, and Hecke’s zeta-functions. InAlgebraic Number Theory (Proc. Instructional Conf., Brighton, 1965), pages 305–347. Thompson, Washington, D.C., 1967. 1

    1965

  59. [59]

    T. Wedhorn. The local Langlands correspondence for GL(n) overp-adic fields. InSchool on Automorphic Forms onGL(n), volume 21 ofICTP Lect. Notes, pages 237–320. Abdus Salam Int. Cent. Theoret. Phys., Trieste, 2008. 45, 46

    2008

  60. [60]

    W. Willems. Bemerkungen zur modularen Darstellungstheorie. III. Induzierte und eingeschr¨ ankte Mod- uln.Arch. Math. (Basel), 26(5):497–503, 1975. 31

    1975

  61. [61]

    S. Yamana. L-functions and theta correspondence for classical groups.Invent. Math., 196(3):651–732,

  62. [62]

    Z. Yao. Notes on Local Langlands for GL n, 2017. Available athttps://people.math.harvard.edu/ ~zyao/notes/notes/LLC.pdf. 46

    2017

  63. [63]

    Ye and E

    R. Ye and E. Zelingher. Exterior square gamma factors for cuspidal representations of GL n: finite field analogs and level-zero representations.Israel J. Math., 240(2):889–934, 2020. 3

    2020

  64. [64]

    Ye and E

    R. Ye and E. Zelingher. Epsilon factors of representations of finite general linear groups.J. Number Theory, 221:122–142, 2021. 41, 46, 50

    2021

  65. [65]

    Yost-Wolff and E

    C. Yost-Wolff and E. Zelingher. On Jacobi sums arising from the classical doubling method. 2025. arXiv:2512.06588. 3, 23, 29, 30

    work page arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    A. V. Zelevinsky. Induced representations of reductivep-adic groups. II. On irreducible representations of GL(n).Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4), 13(2):165–210, 1980. 2, 47

    1980

  67. [67]

    Zelingher

    E. Zelingher. On Speh representations for level zero supercuspidal representations and Ginzburg–Kaplan gamma factors. 2024. arXiv:2408.01856. 3 Department of Mathematical Sciences, Durham University, DH1 3LE, United Kingdom. Email address:johannes.girsch@live.de Department of Mathematics, University of Michigan, 1844 East Hall, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbo...

    work page arXiv 2024