arxiv: 2604.25333 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 🪐 quant-ph · cs.NA· math.NA

Recognition: unknown

Sign Embedding Quantum Algorithms for Matrix Equations and Matrix Functions

Yanqiao Wang , Jin-Peng Liu

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 16:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cs.NAmath.NA

keywords sign embeddingquantum algorithmsSylvester equationblock-encodingmatrix functionsLyapunov equationRiccati equation

0 comments

The pith

Sign embedding produces explicit block-encodings for Sylvester solutions with linear query complexity in conditioning parameters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a sign-embedding framework for quantum algorithms that output matrix solutions or functions. It starts by embedding the target into an augmented matrix whose sign function compresses the operator. For Sylvester equations, this yields an explicit block-encoding whose query cost scales linearly with the inverse of conditioning parameters and logarithmically with error tolerance, even for non-normal matrices, provided a field-of-values gap or strip-resolvent condition holds. The same bookkeeping applies to Lyapunov equations, matrix square roots, geometric means, and Riccati equations. This positions matrix-sign embeddings and nodewise rebalancing as reusable tools for structured quantum linear algebra.

Core claim

We construct a logarithmic-sinc approximation to the half-plane sign operator and combine it with scaled multiplexing and nodewise rebalancing to produce block-encodings of solutions to ordinary Sylvester equations. The resulting algorithm has query complexity linear in the inverse-conditioning parameters and logarithmic in the target error, under field-of-values gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses, and extends the same normalization to generalized Sylvester, Lyapunov, principal square roots, geometric means, and continuous-time algebraic Riccati equations.

What carries the argument

The matrix-sign embedding of an augmented matrix M, which compresses the target operator as a block of sign(M) or (I - sign(M))/2, combined with logarithmic-sinc approximation and nodewise rebalancing.

If this is right

Explicit block-encodings for solutions to generalized Sylvester equations follow from the same overlap-based normalization.
Principal square roots and inverse square roots can be obtained via the same sign-embedding route.
Continuous-time algebraic Riccati equations admit similar quantum algorithms under the stated hypotheses.
Matrix geometric means become accessible through the projector form of the sign function.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

These techniques might extend to other matrix functions whose sign or projector forms admit efficient approximations.
Testing the framework on non-normal matrices with known FoV gaps would validate the linear scaling claims.
Connections to classical contour-integral methods could reveal trade-offs in quantum versus classical resource use.

Load-bearing premise

The field-of-values gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses must hold to prevent exponential blow-up in the number of terms or the condition number during the logarithmic-sinc approximation and rebalancing.

What would settle it

Observe a non-normal Sylvester equation lacking a field-of-values gap and check whether the number of terms in the sign approximation or the condition number of shifted inverses grows exponentially as the target error tolerance decreases.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25333 by Jin-Peng Liu, Yanqiao Wang.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: method overview The same construction reappears later with different augmented matrices: K(A) for principal square roots, a positive scaling of G(A, B) for geometric means, and the Hamiltonian matrix for CARE. In each case the sign function isolates the target operator in a specific block or as a quotient of projector blocks, the log-sinc rule turns that target into a structured rational sum, and QSVT(Quan… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: shift-rotation and common scaling 3 Sign embedding representation for ordinary Sylvester equations The ordinary Sylvester equation is the main model problem of the paper. This section develops the sign representation that identifies the solution operator with a specific sign block of an augmented matrix. Later sections reuse the same pattern with different augmented matrices. 3.1 Half-plane sign Definition… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Roadmap for the three ordinary Sylvester regimes treated in Section view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We develop a systematic sign-embedding framework of operator-output quantum algorithms for matrix equations and matrix functions. Differing from the contour-integral treatment, we start with the matrix-sign embedding route: an augmented matrix $M$ whose half-plane matrix sign compresses the target operator either as a block of $\text{sign}(M)$ or, in projector form, through $(I-\text{sign}(M))/2$; we then construct a logarithmic-sinc approximation for the half-plane sign operator and combine it with structure-aware scaled multiplexing and nodewise rebalancing of shifted inverse families. For ordinary Sylvester equations, we offer an explicit block-encoding of the target matrix solution with query complexity linear in the inverse-conditioning parameters and logarithmic in the target error tolerance, under non-normal and non-diagonalizable settings given a field-of-values (FoV) gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses. These algorithms propagate the same overlap-based normalization bookkeeping to ordinary and generalized Sylvester equations, generalized Lyapunov equations, principal square roots and inverse square roots, matrix geometric means, and continuous-time algebraic Riccati equations (CARE). These results identify matrix-sign embeddings and nodewise rebalancing as reusable design principles for structured operator-output quantum linear algebra.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The sign-embedding route gives a fresh way to build block-encodings for Sylvester-type solutions, but the linear-in-conditioning claim still needs tighter error bounds to rule out hidden exponential dependence on the gap size.

read the letter

The paper's core move is to embed the target matrix equation into an augmented operator whose sign function directly yields the solution as a block, then approximate that sign with a logarithmic-sinc series plus scaled multiplexing and nodewise rebalancing. This differs from the usual contour-integral route and produces explicit query-complexity statements for ordinary and generalized Sylvester equations, Lyapunov equations, square roots, geometric means, and CARE under FoV-gap or strip-resolvent assumptions. The same overlap bookkeeping carries across all these cases, which is a practical plus for anyone who wants to implement several of them from one code base. The constructions look formally grounded enough to be worth checking in detail, especially the way they propagate normalization across the family of shifted inverses. That part feels reusable. The main uncertainty is whether the rebalancing step actually keeps both the number of quadrature nodes and the condition numbers of the individual block-encoded inverses from growing exponentially with 1 over the gap width when the matrices are non-normal. The abstract asserts linear dependence on the inverse-conditioning parameters, but the resolvent-norm bounds for non-normal spectra can still be large even with a positive gap, and nothing visible yet shows that nodewise rebalancing removes every source of exponential blow-up. A full check of the error analysis and the precise hypotheses on the field of values would settle this. The work is aimed at people already working on quantum linear algebra for control or numerical linear algebra problems. Anyone who cares about block-encodings of matrix functions or who needs explicit complexity for non-diagonalizable cases would find the constructions worth reading. It is coherent on its own terms and engages the literature directly, so it should go to peer review rather than desk rejection; the referee can verify the bounds and see whether the claimed linear scaling survives the non-normal case.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a sign-embedding framework for quantum algorithms for matrix equations and matrix functions. Starting from an augmented matrix M whose half-plane sign compresses the target operator, it constructs a logarithmic-sinc approximation to the sign function, combined with structure-aware scaled multiplexing and nodewise rebalancing of shifted-inverse families. For ordinary Sylvester equations it claims an explicit block-encoding of the solution matrix whose query complexity is linear in the inverse-conditioning parameters and only logarithmic in the target error, valid for non-normal non-diagonalizable matrices under a field-of-values gap or strip-resolvent hypothesis; the same normalization bookkeeping is propagated to generalized Sylvester and Lyapunov equations, principal square roots, geometric means, and CARE.

Significance. If the complexity claims and hypothesis handling are fully substantiated, the work supplies reusable design principles (sign embedding plus nodewise rebalancing) that could extend quantum linear-algebra techniques to a broader class of structured non-normal problems while avoiding the exponential dependence sometimes incurred by contour-integral methods. The explicit block-encoding construction and uniform treatment across several equation types constitute a concrete advance in operator-output quantum algorithms.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: the stated linear dependence on inverse-conditioning parameters for the Sylvester block-encoding rests on the claim that the logarithmic-sinc approximant together with nodewise rebalancing removes all exponential dependence on the gap parameter δ from both the number of quadrature nodes and the condition numbers of the individual shifted inverses. For non-normal spectra the resolvent norm can still grow as 1/δ or worse; the manuscript must supply the explicit bound showing that rebalancing prevents this growth from propagating into the overall query complexity.
[Abstract] Abstract: the error analysis and implementation details for the logarithmic-sinc series and the structure-aware scaled multiplexing are not visible in the provided abstract. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the approximation delivers the claimed logarithmic dependence on the target error tolerance while preserving the linear conditioning scaling under the stated FoV-gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have made revisions to improve the clarity of the abstract regarding the complexity claims and error analysis.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: the stated linear dependence on inverse-conditioning parameters for the Sylvester block-encoding rests on the claim that the logarithmic-sinc approximant together with nodewise rebalancing removes all exponential dependence on the gap parameter δ from both the number of quadrature nodes and the condition numbers of the individual shifted inverses. For non-normal spectra the resolvent norm can still grow as 1/δ or worse; the manuscript must supply the explicit bound showing that rebalancing prevents this growth from propagating into the overall query complexity.

Authors: In the full manuscript, the explicit bound is supplied in the analysis following the definition of the nodewise rebalancing (see Section 3.4 and the proof of the main theorem in Section 4). The rebalancing is designed to normalize the shifted inverses so that their norms and condition numbers are controlled uniformly by the gap parameter δ under the FoV or strip-resolvent hypotheses, without introducing additional factors that would lead to exponential dependence. The number of nodes remains logarithmic in the error, and the overall query complexity is thus linear in the inverse-conditioning parameters. We have updated the abstract to explicitly reference this bound and the relevant theorem. revision: yes
Referee: the error analysis and implementation details for the logarithmic-sinc series and the structure-aware scaled multiplexing are not visible in the provided abstract. Without these, it is impossible to confirm that the approximation delivers the claimed logarithmic dependence on the target error tolerance while preserving the linear conditioning scaling under the stated FoV-gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses.

Authors: The error analysis for the logarithmic-sinc approximation, which achieves the logarithmic dependence on the error tolerance, is provided in Section 3.2 of the manuscript. The structure-aware scaled multiplexing is described in Section 3.3, and its compatibility with the linear conditioning scaling is proven under the given hypotheses. To address the referee's concern about visibility in the abstract, we have revised the abstract to include a brief mention of these elements and the resulting complexity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Sign-embedding framework derives block-encodings from explicit constructions without reduction to inputs

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain starts from the matrix-sign embedding of an augmented matrix M, applies a logarithmic-sinc approximant to the half-plane sign function, and combines it with structure-aware scaled multiplexing plus nodewise rebalancing of shifted inverses. These steps are presented as direct constructions that produce the claimed block-encoding and query complexity under the external FoV-gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses; no equations reduce a prediction or central result to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or renamed input by construction. The overlap-based normalization bookkeeping is propagated as a reusable principle rather than a load-bearing self-reference. The framework therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on the existence of a field-of-values gap or strip-resolvent bound that keeps the approximation tractable, plus the assumption that the logarithmic-sinc series and multiplexing can be implemented with the stated query cost; no explicit free parameters or new entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Field-of-values gap or strip-resolvent hypotheses hold for the input matrices
Invoked to guarantee that the sign-embedding and rebalancing produce bounded query complexity without exponential overhead.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5512 in / 1462 out tokens · 43859 ms · 2026-05-07T16:42:03.293206+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

N. J. Higham,Functions of Matrices: Theory and Computation, SIAM, 2008. 69

2008
[2]

Gily´ en, Y

A. Gily´ en, Y. Su, G. H. Low, and N. Wiebe,Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics, Proceedings of the 51st Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC), 2019, 193–204

2019
[3]

A. M. Childs, R. Kothari, and R. D. Somma,Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision, SIAM Journal on Computing46(2017), 1920–1950

2017
[4]

R. D. Somma, G. H. Low, D. W. Berry, and R. Babbush,Quantum algorithm for linear matrix equations, arXiv:2508.02822, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[5]

Benner and E

P. Benner and E. S. Quintana-Ort´ ı,Solving stable generalized Lyapunov equations with the matrix sign function, Numerical Algorithms20(1999), 75–100

1999
[6]

Clayton, J

C. Clayton, J. Leng, G. Yang, Y.-L. Qiao, M. C. Lin, and X. Wu,Differentiable quantum computing for large-scale linear control, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37(2024), 37176–37212

2024
[7]

Benedetti, A

M. Benedetti, A. Rosmanis, and M. Rosenkranz,Probabilistic quantum algorithm for Lyapunov equations and matrix inversion, Physical Review Applied25(2026), 044040

2026
[8]

J. D. Roberts,Linear model reduction and solution of the algebraic Riccati equation by use of the sign function, International Journal of Control32(1980), 677–687

1980
[9]

Byers,Solving the algebraic Riccati equation with the matrix sign function, Linear Algebra and its Applications85(1987), 267–279

R. Byers,Solving the algebraic Riccati equation with the matrix sign function, Linear Algebra and its Applications85(1987), 267–279

1987
[10]

Lancaster and L

P. Lancaster and L. Rodman,Algebraic Riccati Equations, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1995

1995
[11]

R. H. Bartels and G. W. Stewart,Solution of the matrix equationAX+XB=C, Communi- cations of the ACM15(1972), 820–826

1972
[12]

Simoncini,Computational methods for linear matrix equations, SIAM Review58(2016), 377–441

V. Simoncini,Computational methods for linear matrix equations, SIAM Review58(2016), 377–441

2016
[13]

A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd,Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Physical Review Letters103(2009), 150502

2009
[14]

G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang,Optimal Hamiltonian simulation by quantum signal processing, Physical Review Letters118(2017), 010501

2017
[15]

G. H. Low and I. L. Chuang,Hamiltonian simulation by qubitization, Quantum3(2019), 163

2019
[16]

Dervovic, M

D. Dervovic, M. Herbster, P. Mountney, S. Severini, N. Usher, and L. Wossnig,Quantum linear systems algorithms: a primer, arXiv:1802.08227, 2018. 70

work page arXiv 2018
[17]

C. S. Kenney and A. J. Laub,The matrix sign function, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control40(1995), 1330–1348

1995
[18]

N. Hale, N. J. Higham, and L. N. Trefethen,ComputingA α,log(A), and related matrix func- tions by contour integrals, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis46(2008), 2505–2523

2008
[19]

Nakatsukasa and R

Y. Nakatsukasa and R. W. Freund,Computing fundamental matrix decompositions accurately via the matrix sign function in two iterations: the power of Zolotarev’s functions, SIAM Review 58(2016), 461–493

2016
[20]

E. S. Gawlik,Zolotarev iterations for the matrix square root, SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications40(2019), 696–719

2019
[21]

Sun and J

H. Sun and J. Zhang,Solving Lyapunov equation by quantum algorithm, Control Theory and Technology15(2017), 267–273

2017
[22]

Takahira, A

S. Takahira, A. Ohashi, T. Sogabe, and T. S. Usuda,Quantum algorithms based on the block- encoding framework for matrix functions by contour integrals, Quantum Information and Com- putation22(2022), no. 11–12, 0965–0979

2022
[23]

A Unified Poisson Summation Framework for Generalized Quantum Matrix Transformations

C. Wang, X.-N. Zhuang, M. Dou, Z.-Y. Chen, and G.-P. Guo,A unified Poisson summation framework for generalized quantum matrix transformations, arXiv:2604.02874, 2026

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[24]

Ballew, T

C. Ballew, T. Trogdon, and H. Wilber,The Akhiezer iteration and inverse-free solvers for Sylvester matrix equations, arXiv:2503.17496, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

N. Liu, Q. Wang, M. M. Wilde, and Z. Zhang,Quantum algorithms for matrix geometric means, npj Quantum Information11(2025), 101

2025
[26]

An, J.-P

D. An, J.-P. Liu, and L. Lin,Linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation for nonunitary dynamics with optimal state preparation cost, Physical Review Letters131(2023), 150603, arXiv:2303.01029

work page arXiv 2023
[27]

D. An, A. M. Childs, and L. Lin,Quantum algorithm for linear non-unitary dynamics with near-optimal dependence on all parameters, Communications in Mathematical Physics407 (2026), no. 1, 19

2026
[28]

D. An, A. M. Childs, L. Lin, and L. Ying,Laplace transform-based quantum eigenvalue trans- formation via linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation, SIAM Journal on Computing55 (2026), no. 2, 376–409

2026
[29]

S. Jin, N. Liu, and Y. Yu,Quantum simulation of partial differential equations: Applications and detailed analysis, Physical Review A108(2023), 032603

2023
[30]

S. Jin, N. Liu, and Y. Yu,Quantum simulation of partial differential equations via Schr¨ odingerization, Physical Review Letters133(2024), 230602. 71

2024
[31]

S. Jin, N. Liu, and C. Ma,On Schr¨ odingerization-based quantum algorithms for linear dynam- ical systems with inhomogeneous terms, SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis63(2025), no. 4, 1861–1885

2025
[32]

S. Jin, N. Liu, C. Ma, Y. Peng, and Y. Yu,On the Schr¨ odingerization method for linear non-unitary dynamics with optimal dependence on matrix queries, Communications in Math- ematical Sciences24(2026), no. 2, 565–592

2026
[33]

G. H. Low and Y. Su,Quantum eigenvalue processing, SIAM Journal on Computing55(2026), no. 1, 135–215

2026
[34]

G. Yang, J. Leng, X. Wu, and L. Lin,Towards end-to-end quantum estimation of non- Hermitian pseudospectra, arXiv:2603.16214, 2026

work page arXiv 2026
[35]

Y. Liu, Y. Huang, Y. Wang, P. Li, and Y. Liu,AI Mathematician: Towards Fully Automated Frontier Mathematical Research, arXiv:2505.22451, 2025. A Minimal block-encoding calculus used in the proofs For completeness we record the basic rules and standard gadgets used repeatedly in the main text. A.1 Basic rules Lemma A.1(Product rule).IfU X is an(ν X , aX ,0...

work page arXiv 2025