arxiv: 2604.26016 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· math-ph· math.MP· quant-ph

Recognition: unknown

The Schrodinger Equation as a Gauge Theory

Dmitry S. Ageev , Vladimir A. Bykov

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.MPquant-ph

keywords Schrödinger equationMadelung representationgauge theoryquantum hydrodynamicsChern-SimonsBF theoryphase windinganyons

0 comments

The pith

The Schrödinger equation is locally equivalent to a gauge theory whose fields encode the probability current, with all quantum features isolated in the quantization of phase windings around wavefunction zeros.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper starts from the Madelung fluid representation of the wavefunction and rewrites the conserved probability current exactly as the strength of a gauge field: a one-form in two spatial dimensions and a two-form in three. This produces a local dictionary that maps the Schrödinger dynamics onto both quantum hydrodynamics and a gauge theory without adding or losing information at the level of the equations of motion. Global quantum information survives in the topological quantization of the phase around nodes of the wavefunction. The correspondence then lets standard gauge-theory structures—BF couplings, Chern-Simons terms, boundary edge modes—reproduce electromagnetic interactions, Berry phases, anyonic statistics, and infrared memory effects that appear in the nonlinear regime.

Core claim

Starting from the Madelung representation, the conserved probability current is rewritten using gauge fields: a one-form gauge field in the (2+1)-dimensional theory and a two-form gauge field in the (3+1)-dimensional theory. This produces a local equivalence between the Schrödinger equation, quantum hydrodynamics, and a gauge formulation, while the global information is carried by the quantization of phase winding around zeros of the wavefunction. BF couplings then encode electromagnetic coupling, Berry connections, spinor dynamics, and projected non-abelian adiabatic connections, while Chern-Simons terms generate Hopf functionals, charge-flux attachment, and anyonic sectors; boundary terms,

What carries the argument

The Madelung decomposition of the wavefunction, which converts the probability current into the field strength of a one-form (2+1D) or two-form (3+1D) gauge field while isolating all quantum content in the integer winding of the phase around wavefunction nodes.

If this is right

BF couplings to additional one-forms reproduce electromagnetic interactions, Berry connections, and spinor dynamics inside the gauge formulation.
Chern-Simons terms produce Hopf functionals, charge-flux attachment, and anyonic sectors.
Topological boundary terms generate edge degrees of freedom and boundary charge algebras.
In the nonlinear regime the two-form description organizes acoustic memory, large gauge transformations, and the corresponding soft theorem into an infrared triangle.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same rewriting may supply a new route for numerical integration of the Schrödinger equation by importing gauge-theory simulation techniques.
Phase-winding quantization could be used to classify topological sectors in many-body wavefunctions without explicit reference to the gauge fields.
The construction suggests a possible extension to the Dirac or Klein-Gordon equation by replacing the two-form with an appropriate higher-form gauge field.
The infrared triangle identified in the nonlinear case may have a direct counterpart in standard quantum optics or Bose-Einstein condensate experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The probability current can be rewritten exactly as a gauge-field strength in each dimension without introducing extra constraints or losing any of the local Schrödinger dynamics.

What would settle it

An explicit solution of the Schrödinger equation in two or three spatial dimensions whose probability current cannot be expressed as the exterior derivative of a one-form or two-form gauge potential while still satisfying the continuity and Euler equations derived from the Madelung fluid.

read the original abstract

In this paper, we reformulate the Schrodinger equation in gauge-theoretic terms. Starting from the Madelung representation, we rewrite the conserved probability-current using gauge fields, namely a one-form gauge field in the $(2+1)$-dimensional theory and a two-form gauge field in the $(3+1)$-dimensional theory. This gives a local equivalence between the Schrodinger equation, quantum hydrodynamics, and a gauge formulation, while the global information is carried by the quantization of phase winding around zeros of the wavefunction. We then explore how this correspondence organizes structures on both sides of the duality. On the gauge side, BF couplings to additional one-forms describe electromagnetic coupling, Berry connections, spinor dynamics, projected non-abelian adiabatic connections, and intrinsic holonomy, while Chern--Simons term generate Hopf functionals, charge-flux attachment, and anyonic sectors. In the presence of boundaries, the topological terms produce edge degrees of freedom and boundary charge algebras. Finally, in the nonlinear regime with a Bogoliubov sound mode, the dual two-form description relates acoustic memory, large gauge transformations and the corresponding soft theorem, organizing them into an infrared triangle.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper rewrites the Schrödinger equation as a gauge theory by mapping the Madelung current to 1-form or 2-form field strengths, but it is an exact change of variables that organizes known features without deriving new dynamics from the gauge side.

read the letter

The main takeaway is a gauge reformulation of the Schrödinger equation that starts from the Madelung fluid picture and expresses the probability current as the Hodge dual of a gauge field strength: a 1-form in 2+1 dimensions and a 2-form in 3+1 dimensions. Local dynamics are recovered once the quantum potential is restored, while global information comes from standard phase winding around wavefunction zeros.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to reformulate the Schrödinger equation in gauge-theoretic terms. Starting from the Madelung representation, the conserved probability current is rewritten using the field strength of a one-form gauge field in (2+1) dimensions and a two-form gauge field in (3+1) dimensions. This is asserted to establish a local equivalence between the Schrödinger equation, quantum hydrodynamics, and the gauge formulation, while global information is carried by quantization of phase windings around wavefunction zeros. The correspondence is then used to organize BF couplings (for electromagnetic interactions, Berry connections, spinors, and holonomy), Chern-Simons terms (for Hopf functionals, charge-flux attachment, and anyons), boundary effects (edge degrees of freedom and charge algebras), and infrared structures (acoustic memory and soft theorems) in the nonlinear Bogoliubov regime.

Significance. If the local equivalence holds exactly, the work provides a useful dictionary between quantum hydrodynamics and gauge theory, allowing standard constructions such as BF theory and Chern-Simons terms to be applied systematically to Schrödinger systems. This organizes phenomena like anyonic statistics, boundary algebras, and infrared triangles under one framework and may enable transfer of techniques between fields. The paper receives credit for the explicit rewriting and the breadth of explored dual structures, though the reformulation is by construction a change of variables supplemented by the standard quantum potential and phase quantization.

major comments (2)

The central claim of local equivalence rests on rewriting the probability current as a gauge field strength. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate (with the relevant equations) that the gauge-field equations of motion, when supplemented by the quantum potential, recover the full Madelung continuity and Euler equations identically, without loss of information or extra constraints. This verification is load-bearing for the asserted equivalence.
In the discussion of global features, the paper attributes all quantum information to standard phase-winding quantization around nodes. It should confirm that the gauge formulation introduces no independent global constraints (e.g., from the higher-form fields or boundary terms) that would alter the equivalence to the original Schrödinger theory.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the gauge fields should be introduced with explicit definitions and dimension-specific symbols to prevent confusion between the 1-form and 2-form cases.
Each application of the duality (BF couplings, Chern-Simons terms, boundary algebras, infrared triangle) would benefit from at least one concrete equation or short example mapping the gauge side to the quantum side for improved readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. The comments help clarify the presentation of the local equivalence between the Schrödinger equation and the gauge formulation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly to incorporate the suggested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim of local equivalence rests on rewriting the probability current as a gauge field strength. The manuscript must explicitly demonstrate (with the relevant equations) that the gauge-field equations of motion, when supplemented by the quantum potential, recover the full Madelung continuity and Euler equations identically, without loss of information or extra constraints. This verification is load-bearing for the asserted equivalence.

Authors: We concur that an explicit demonstration is essential for establishing the claimed local equivalence. Although the reformulation is constructed as a direct change of variables from the Madelung representation, we will add in the revised manuscript a detailed derivation showing that the equations of motion for the gauge fields, when the quantum potential is included, precisely reproduce the continuity and Euler equations of quantum hydrodynamics. This will be presented with the relevant equations to confirm there is no loss of information or introduction of extraneous constraints. revision: yes
Referee: In the discussion of global features, the paper attributes all quantum information to standard phase-winding quantization around nodes. It should confirm that the gauge formulation introduces no independent global constraints (e.g., from the higher-form fields or boundary terms) that would alter the equivalence to the original Schrödinger theory.

Authors: The gauge formulation is obtained via a local rewriting of the probability current, so the global information remains encoded solely in the phase windings around the nodes of the wavefunction, as in the original theory. The higher-form gauge fields are auxiliary and their quantization is determined by these same windings. Boundary terms from the topological couplings generate edge modes that are consistent with the boundary conditions imposed on the Schrödinger equation and do not introduce independent global constraints. We will include an explicit statement confirming this in the revised discussion of global features. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Explicit reformulation with no load-bearing circularity

full rationale

The paper states it starts from the Madelung representation and performs an exact rewriting of the probability current as a gauge-field strength (one-form in 2+1D, two-form in 3+1D). This is presented as a change of variables that recovers the local dynamics of the Schrödinger equation by construction once the same quantum potential and phase-winding quantization are reintroduced. No step claims an independent first-principles derivation or prediction that reduces to a fitted parameter, self-citation chain, or ansatz smuggled from prior work by the same authors. Global features are attributed to standard quantization of phase winding around nodes, which is not derived anew here. The construction is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or load-bearing self-citations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Madelung representation and standard quantization of phase winding; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract. All background is drawn from established quantum mechanics and gauge theory.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Madelung representation of the wavefunction as amplitude times phase
Starting point for expressing the probability current in gauge form.
domain assumption Quantization of phase winding around wavefunction zeros carries all global quantum information
Used to separate local gauge dynamics from nonlocal quantum effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5515 in / 1396 out tokens · 53175 ms · 2026-05-07T15:28:17.526544+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 54 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

A gauge theory for shallow water,

D. Tong, “A gauge theory for shallow water,” SciPost Phys.14, no.5, 102 (2023) [arXiv:2209.10574 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023
[2]

Euler fluid in 2+1 dimensions as a gauge theory and an action for the Euler fluid in any dimension,

H. Nastase and J. Sonnenschein, “Euler fluid in 2+1 dimensions as a gauge theory and an action for the Euler fluid in any dimension,” Phys. Rev. D109, no.8, 085006 (2024) [arXiv:2303.15229 [hep-th]]. – 53 –

work page arXiv 2024
[3]

A gauge theory for the 2+1 dimensional incompressible Euler equations,

C. Eling, “A gauge theory for the 2+1 dimensional incompressible Euler equations,” [arXiv:2305.04394 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[4]

A gauge theory for the 3+1 dimensional incompressible Euler equations,

C. Eling, “A gauge theory for the 3+1 dimensional incompressible Euler equations,” [arXiv:2310.12475 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[5]

Note on a description of a perfect fluid by the Kalb–Ramond field,

Y. Matsuo and A. Sugamoto, “Note on a description of a perfect fluid by the Kalb–Ramond field,” PTEP2021, no.12, 12C104 (2021)

2021
[6]

Fluid/p-form duality,

V. Taghiloo and M. H. Vahidinia, “Fluid/p-form duality,” Phys. Lett. B849, 138450 (2024) [arXiv:2311.09125 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[7]

On the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics associated with Classical Pictures,

T. Takabayasi, “On the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics associated with Classical Pictures,” Prog. Theor. Phys.8, no.2, 143–182 (1952) doi:10.1143/PTP.8.143

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.8.143 1952
[8]

Remarks on the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics with Classical Pictures and on Relations between Linear Scalar Fields and Hydrodynamical Fields,

T. Takabayasi, “Remarks on the Formulation of Quantum Mechanics with Classical Pictures and on Relations between Linear Scalar Fields and Hydrodynamical Fields,” Prog. Theor. Phys.9, no.3, 187–222 (1953) doi:10.1143/PTP.9.187

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.9.187 1953
[9]

On the Hydrodynamical Representation of Non-Relativistic Spinor Equation,

T. Takabayasi, “On the Hydrodynamical Representation of Non-Relativistic Spinor Equation,” Prog. Theor. Phys.12, no.6, 810–812 (1954) doi:10.1143/PTP.12.810

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.12.810 1954
[10]

The Vector Representation of Spinning Particle in the Quantum Theory. I,

T. Takabayasi, “The Vector Representation of Spinning Particle in the Quantum Theory. I,” Prog. Theor. Phys.14, no.4, 283–302 (1955) doi:10.1143/PTP.14.283

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.14.283 1955
[11]

Hydrodynamical description of the Dirac equation,

T. Takabayasi, “Hydrodynamical description of the Dirac equation,” Nuovo Cim.3, 233–241 (1956) doi:10.1007/BF02745412

work page doi:10.1007/bf02745412 1956
[12]

Variational Principle in the Hydrodynamical Formulation of the Dirac Field,

T. Takabayasi, “Variational Principle in the Hydrodynamical Formulation of the Dirac Field,” Phys. Rev.102, 297–298 (1956) doi:10.1103/PhysRev.102.297

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.102.297 1956
[13]

Relativistic Hydrodynamics of the Dirac Matter. Part I. General Theory,

T. Takabayasi, “Relativistic Hydrodynamics of the Dirac Matter. Part I. General Theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.4, 1–80 (1957) doi:10.1143/PTPS.4.2

work page doi:10.1143/ptps.4.2 1957
[14]

Description of Pauli Matter as a Continuous Assembly of Small Rotating Bodies,

T. Takabayasi and J. P. Vigier, “Description of Pauli Matter as a Continuous Assembly of Small Rotating Bodies,” Prog. Theor. Phys.18, no.6, 573–590 (1957) doi:10.1143/PTP.18.573

work page doi:10.1143/ptp.18.573 1957
[15]

Vortex, Spin and Triad for Quantum Mechanics of Spinning Particle. Part 1. General Theory,

T. Takabayasi, “Vortex, Spin and Triad for Quantum Mechanics of Spinning Particle. Part 1. General Theory,” Prog. Theor. Phys.70, 1 (1983)

1983
[16]

Hydrodynamic form of the Weyl equation,

I. Bialynicki-Birula, “Hydrodynamic form of the Weyl equation,” Acta Phys. Polon. B 26, 1201-1208 (1995)

1995
[17]

Kinematics and hydrodynamics of spinning particles,

E. Recami and G. Salesi, “Kinematics and hydrodynamics of spinning particles,” Phys. Rev. A57, 98-105 (1998) [arXiv:quant-ph/9607025 [quant-ph]]

work page arXiv 1998
[18]

The geometro-hydrodynamical formalism of the quantum spinning particle,

M. Trukhanova, Iv., “The geometro-hydrodynamical formalism of the quantum spinning particle,” PTEP2018, no.12, 123A01 (2018) [arXiv:1810.04716 [gr-qc]]. – 54 –

work page arXiv 2018
[19]

Hydrodynamic description of Weyl fermions in condensed state of matter,

M. Trukhanova, Iv. and P. Andreev, “Hydrodynamic description of Weyl fermions in condensed state of matter,” Eur. Phys. J. B94, no.8, 170 (2021) [arXiv:2108.06833 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

work page arXiv 2021
[20]

Quantum Hydrodynamics of Spinning Particles in Electromagnetic and Torsion Fields,

M. Trukhanova, Iv. and Y. N. Obukhov, “Quantum Hydrodynamics of Spinning Particles in Electromagnetic and Torsion Fields,” Universe7, no.12, 498 (2021) [arXiv:2111.10623 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2021
[21]

de Broglie–Bohm Formulation of Dirac Fields,

L. Fabbri, “de Broglie–Bohm Formulation of Dirac Fields,” Found. Phys.52, no.6, 116 (2022) [arXiv:2207.05755 [quant-ph]]

work page arXiv 2022
[22]

Dirac Theory in Hydrodynamic Form,

L. Fabbri, “Dirac Theory in Hydrodynamic Form,” Found. Phys.53, no.3, 54 (2023) [arXiv:2303.17461 [quant-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[23]

Dirac Hydrodynamics in 19 Forms,

L. Fabbri, “Dirac Hydrodynamics in 19 Forms,” Symmetry15, no.9, 1685 (2023) [arXiv:2309.00617 [quant-ph]]

work page arXiv 2023
[24]

Madelung structure of the Dirac equation,

L. Fabbri, “Madelung structure of the Dirac equation,” J. Phys. A58, no.19, 195301 (2025) [arXiv:2505.05861 [math-ph]]

work page arXiv 2025
[25]

The Hydrodynamic Representation of the Quantum Relativistic Dynamics of the Electron,

L. D’Alessi, “The Hydrodynamic Representation of the Quantum Relativistic Dynamics of the Electron,” [arXiv:2309.04495 [quant-ph]]

work page arXiv
[26]

Topological Origin of Equatorial Waves,

P. Delplace, J. B. Marston and A. Venaille, “Topological Origin of Equatorial Waves,” Science358, 1075 [arXiv:1702.07583 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

work page arXiv
[27]

Shallow water memory: Stokes and Darwin drifts,

M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari, V. Taghiloo and M. H. Vahidinia, “Shallow water memory: Stokes and Darwin drifts,” SciPost Phys.15, no.3, 115 (2023) [arXiv:2302.04912 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2023
[28]

Edge modes in Chern-Simons theory on a strip

E. Bertolini, M. Doyle, N. Maggiore, C. Murphy and C. Piras, “Edge modes in Chern-Simons theory on a strip,” [arXiv:2604.05889 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[29]

Topological fluids with boundaries and fractional quantum Hall edge dynamics: A fluid dynamics derivation of the chiral boson action,

G. M. Monteiro, V. P. Nair and S. Ganeshan, “Topological fluids with boundaries and fractional quantum Hall edge dynamics: A fluid dynamics derivation of the chiral boson action,” Phys. Rev. B109, no.17, 174525 (2024) [arXiv:2203.06516 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

work page arXiv 2024
[30]

Hydrodynamic Edge Modes and Fragile Surface States of Symmetry Protected Integer Quantum Hall Effect of Bosons,

D. Reynolds, G. M. Monteiro and S. Ganeshan, “Hydrodynamic Edge Modes and Fragile Surface States of Symmetry Protected Integer Quantum Hall Effect of Bosons,” [arXiv:2405.10309 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

work page arXiv
[31]

Gauge theory for topological waves in continuum fluids with odd viscosity,

K. Fujii and Y. Ashida, “Gauge theory for topological waves in continuum fluids with odd viscosity,” SciPost Phys. Core8, 058 (2025) [arXiv:2411.02958 [cond-mat.soft]]

work page arXiv 2025
[32]

Precise Correspondence between the p-wave Chiral Superfluid and the Spinless Bosonic Superfluid in the Lowest Landau Level,

W. H. Hsiao, “Precise Correspondence between the p-wave Chiral Superfluid and the Spinless Bosonic Superfluid in the Lowest Landau Level,” J. Phys. Soc. Jap.94, no.3, 034601 (2025) [arXiv:2407.05243 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

Nonequilibrium charge-vortex duality,

L. Tsaloukidis, F. Pe˜ na-Ben´ ıtez and P. Sur´ owka, “Nonequilibrium charge-vortex duality,” Phys. Rev. B112, no.10, 104516 (2025) [arXiv:2503.09623 [hep-th]]. – 55 –

work page arXiv 2025
[34]

Holonomy and vortex structures in quantum hydrodynamics,

C. Tronci and M. S. Foskett, “Holonomy and vortex structures in quantum hydrodynamics,” doi:10.1017/9781009320733.006 [arXiv:2003.08664 [math-ph]]

work page doi:10.1017/9781009320733.006 2003
[35]

Linking Numbers, Spin, and Statistics of Solitons,

F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Linking Numbers, Spin, and Statistics of Solitons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.51, 2250-2252 (1983)

1983
[36]

Comments on the Hopf Lagrangian and Fractional Statistics of Solitons,

Y. S. Wu and A. Zee, “Comments on the Hopf Lagrangian and Fractional Statistics of Solitons,” Phys. Lett. B147, 325-329 (1984)

1984
[37]

Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect,

D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer and F. Wilczek, “Fractional Statistics and the Quantum Hall Effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.53, 722-723 (1984)

1984
[38]

Statistical Mechanics of Anyons,

D. P. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Statistical Mechanics of Anyons,” Nucl. Phys. B251, 117-126 (1985)

1985
[39]

Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics,

S. Forte, “Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics,” Rev. Mod. Phys.64, 193-236 (1992)

1992
[40]

Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,

S. Elitzur, G. W. Moore, A. Schwimmer and N. Seiberg, “Remarks on the Canonical Quantization of the Chern-Simons-Witten Theory,” Nucl. Phys. B326, 108-134 (1989)

1989
[41]

Conformal edge currents in Chern-Simons theories,

A. P. Balachandran, G. Bimonte, K. S. Gupta and A. Stern, “Conformal edge currents in Chern-Simons theories,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A7, 4655-4670 (1992) [arXiv:hep-th/9110072 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1992
[42]

Symplectic reduction and symmetry algebra in boundary Chern-Simons theory,

P. Oh and M. I. Park, “Symplectic reduction and symmetry algebra in boundary Chern-Simons theory,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A14, 231-238 (1999) [arXiv:hep-th/9805178 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1999
[43]

The Edge states of the BF system and the London equations,

A. P. Balachandran and P. Teotonio-Sobrinho, “The Edge states of the BF system and the London equations,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A8, 723-752 (1993) [arXiv:hep-th/9205116 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1993
[44]

Edge states in 4-d and their 3-d groups and fields,

A. P. Balachandran, G. Bimonte and P. Teotonio-Sobrinho, “Edge states in 4-d and their 3-d groups and fields,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A8, 1305-1314 (1993) [arXiv:hep-th/9301120 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 1993
[45]

Three-dimensional dynamics of four-dimensional topological BF theory with boundary,

A. Amoretti, A. Blasi, N. Maggiore and N. Magnoli, “Three-dimensional dynamics of four-dimensional topological BF theory with boundary,” New J. Phys.14, 113014 (2012) [arXiv:1205.6156 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2012
[46]

What can abelian gauge theories teach us about kinematic algebras?,

K. Armstrong-Williams, S. Nagy, C. D. White and S. Wikeley, “What can abelian gauge theories teach us about kinematic algebras?,” JHEP08, 169 (2024) [arXiv:2401.10750 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Some aspects of symmetry descent,

I. Garc´ ıa Etxebarria and S. S. Hosseini, “Some aspects of symmetry descent,” JHEP 12, 223 (2025) [arXiv:2404.16028 [hep-th]]. – 56 –

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

Soliton Solutions to the Gauged Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation on the Plane,

R. Jackiw and S. Y. Pi, “Soliton Solutions to the Gauged Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation on the Plane,” Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2969-2972 (1990)

1990
[49]

Selfdual vortices in Chern-Simons hydrodynamics,

O. K. Pashaev and J. H. Lee, “Selfdual vortices in Chern-Simons hydrodynamics,” Theor. Math. Phys.127, 779-788 (2001) [arXiv:hep-th/0104258 [hep-th]]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2001
[50]

Sound as a gauge theory and its infrared triangle,

N. de Aguiar Alves and A. G. S. Landulfo, “Sound as a gauge theory and its infrared triangle,” [arXiv:2512.15796 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv
[51]

Inherent nonlinearity of fluid motion and acoustic gravitational wave memory,

S. Datta and U. R. Fischer, “Inherent nonlinearity of fluid motion and acoustic gravitational wave memory,” Phys. Rev. D105, no.2, 022003 (2022) [arXiv:2011.05837 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2022
[52]

Infrared photons and gravitons,

S. Weinberg, “Infrared photons and gravitons,” Phys. Rev.140, B516–B524 (1965)

1965
[53]

On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering

A. Strominger, “On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,” JHEP07, 152 (2014) [arXiv:1312.2229 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[54]

New Symmetries of Massless QED,

T. He, P. Mitra, A. P. Porfyriadis and A. Strominger, “New Symmetries of Massless QED,” JHEP10, 112 (2014) [arXiv:1407.3789 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2014
[55]

Strominger and A

A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov, “Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,” JHEP01, 086 (2016) [arXiv:1411.5745 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2016
[56]

Retarded Fields of Null Particles and the Memory Effect,

A. Tolish and R. M. Wald, “Retarded Fields of Null Particles and the Memory Effect,” Phys. Rev. D89, no.6, 064008 (2014) [arXiv:1401.5831 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2014
[57]

Asymptotic behavior of massless fields and the memory effect,

G. Satishchandran and R. M. Wald, “Asymptotic behavior of massless fields and the memory effect,” Phys. Rev. D99, no.8, 084007 (2019) [arXiv:1901.05942 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2019
[58]

Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,

M. Campiglia and A. Laddha, “Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,” JHEP07, 115 (2015) [arXiv:1505.05346 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2015
[59]

An electromagnetic analogue of gravitational wave memory,

L. Bieri and D. Garfinkle, “An electromagnetic analogue of gravitational wave memory,” Class. Quant. Grav.30, 195009 (2013) [arXiv:1307.5098 [gr-qc]]

work page arXiv 2013
[60]

Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory,

S. Pasterski, “Asymptotic Symmetries and Electromagnetic Memory,” JHEP09, 154 (2017) [arXiv:1505.00716 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2017
[61]

Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,

H. Bondi, M. G. J. van der Burg and A. W. K. Metzner, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 7. Waves from axisymmetric isolated systems,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A269, 21-52 (1962)

1962
[62]

Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,

R. K. Sachs, “Gravitational waves in general relativity. 8. Waves in asymptotically flat space-times,” Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A270, 103-126 (1962)

1962
[63]

Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,

Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. G. Polnarev, “Radiation of gravitational waves by a cluster of superdense stars,” Sov. Astron.18, 17 (1974)

1974
[64]

Can scalars have asymptotic symmetries?,

M. Campiglia, L. Coito and S. Mizera, “Can scalars have asymptotic symmetries?,” Phys. Rev. D97, no.4, 046002 (2018) [arXiv:1703.07885 [hep-th]]. – 57 –

work page arXiv 2018
[65]

Scalar Asymptotic Charges and Dual Large Gauge Transformations,

M. Campiglia, L. Freidel, F. Hopfmueller and R. M. Soni, “Scalar Asymptotic Charges and Dual Large Gauge Transformations,” JHEP04, 003 (2019) [arXiv:1810.04213 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2019
[66]

Two-Form Asymptotic Symmetries and Scalar Soft Theorems,

D. Francia and C. Heissenberg, “Two-Form Asymptotic Symmetries and Scalar Soft Theorems,” Phys. Rev. D98, no.10, 105003 (2018) [arXiv:1810.05634 [hep-th]]

work page arXiv 2018
[67]

On the determination of Born–Oppenheimer nuclear motion wave functions including complications due to conical intersections and identical nuclei,

C. A. Mead and D. G. Truhlar, “On the determination of Born–Oppenheimer nuclear motion wave functions including complications due to conical intersections and identical nuclei,” J. Chem. Phys.70, no.5, 2284 (1979)

1979
[68]

Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems,

F. Wilczek and A. Zee, “Appearance of Gauge Structure in Simple Dynamical Systems,” Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 2111-2114 (1984)

1984
[69]

Non-Abelian gauge potentials for ultra-cold atoms with degenerate dark states,

J. Ruseckas, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. Oehberg and M. Fleischhauer, “Non-Abelian gauge potentials for ultra-cold atoms with degenerate dark states,” Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 010404 (2005) [arXiv:cond-mat/0503187 [cond-mat.mes-hall]]

work page arXiv 2005
[70]

Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms,

J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeliunas and P. Ohberg, “Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms,” Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011) [arXiv:1008.5378 [cond-mat.quant-gas]]. – 58 –

work page arXiv 2011