pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27882 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 💻 cs.AI · cs.HC

Building Persona-Based Agents On Demand: Tailoring Multi-Agent Workflows to User Needs

Giuseppe Arbore , Andrea Sillano , Luigi De Russis This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 06:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.AI cs.HC
keywords multi-agent systemspersona generationon-demand agentsagentic workflowsdynamic personalizationruntime adaptationAI agent design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Multi-agent AI systems can adapt to users by generating custom personas on demand at runtime instead of relying on fixed roles.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Current multi-agent systems typically depend on hard-coded agent architectures with preset roles and interaction patterns. This limits how well they can respond to varying user traits, specific tasks, or changing contexts. The paper proposes that generating agents and personas dynamically during operation offers a route to more suitable and efficient interactions. It details a pipeline showing how this real-time creation can fit inside agent platforms. If workable, the approach would replace one-size-fits-all designs with configurations matched to the immediate situation.

Core claim

On-demand persona-based agent generation offers a promising path towards more efficient and contextually appropriate interaction within agentic workflows. By dynamically crafting agents and personas at run-time to match user characteristics, task demands, and workflow context, agentic platforms can move beyond one-size-fits-all configurations. We present a pipeline for on-demand persona generation in agentic platforms, detailing how real-time crafting of AI personas can be systematically integrated within agent systems.

What carries the argument

A pipeline for on-demand persona generation that integrates real-time crafting of AI personas to match user characteristics, task demands, and workflow context inside agent systems.

If this is right

  • Agent coordination patterns and interaction flows can shift from fixed presets to runtime adjustments based on current user and task needs.
  • End users gain access to agent behaviors tailored to their individual traits without requiring system redesign for each new scenario.
  • Agentic platforms gain flexibility to handle diverse contexts through generated personas rather than exhaustive pre-programming of roles.
  • Design of multi-agent systems can shift toward runtime generation mechanisms as a core feature instead of static architectures.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pipeline might pair naturally with real-time user sensing methods to infer traits like expertise level or current intent for persona creation.
  • Developers could apply the same on-demand logic to other elements such as tool selection or coordination rules within the workflow.
  • Domain-specific testing, for example in customer support or personal planning tasks, would help identify where generated personas add the most value.

Load-bearing premise

Real-time crafting of AI personas can be systematically integrated within agent systems in a feasible, consistent, and beneficial way without major technical or performance drawbacks.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison of task outcomes and user satisfaction on the same personalized workflows, once using fixed pre-defined agents and once using the on-demand persona pipeline, while tracking any added latency or inconsistency.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27882 by Andrea Sillano, Giuseppe Arbore, Luigi De Russis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: A visual representation of the pipeline’s steps view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent advances in agentic AI are shifting automation from discrete tools to proactive multi-agent systems that coordinate multi-specialized capabilities behind unified interfaces. However, today's agent systems typically rely on hard-coded agent architectures with fixed roles, coordination patterns, and interaction flows that limit end-user personalization and make adaptation to individual needs and contexts difficult. Given this limitation, we argue that on-demand persona-based agent generation offers a promising path towards more efficient and contextually appropriate interaction within agentic workflows. By dynamically crafting agents and personas at run-time to match user characteristics, task demands, and workflow context, agentic platforms can move beyond one-size-fits-all configurations. We present a pipeline for on-demand persona generation in agentic platforms, detailing how real-time crafting of AI personas can be systematically integrated within agent systems, aiming to open new possibilities in agentic platform design paradigms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper argues that current multi-agent AI systems rely on hard-coded agent architectures with fixed roles and interaction flows, which limit personalization and adaptation to individual user needs and contexts. It proposes on-demand persona-based agent generation as a solution and presents a high-level pipeline for dynamically crafting agents and personas at runtime to match user characteristics, task demands, and workflow context, with the goal of enabling more efficient and contextually appropriate agentic workflows and opening new design paradigms.

Significance. If the proposed pipeline could be realized with concrete, feasible mechanisms, it would represent a meaningful conceptual shift in agentic AI from static, one-size-fits-all configurations toward dynamic, user-tailored multi-agent systems. This could improve interaction efficiency and appropriateness in proactive automation platforms. The manuscript clearly articulates a limitation in existing systems and sketches a forward-looking alternative, though the absence of any technical specification or validation leaves the significance prospective rather than demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and pipeline description] Abstract and pipeline description: The claim that 'real-time crafting of AI personas can be systematically integrated within agent systems' (abstract) rests on an outline of user/task/context matching followed by persona generation and workflow integration, but supplies no mechanisms for persona generation (e.g., prompt engineering, retrieval, or fine-tuning), no procedures for maintaining inter-agent consistency or resolving role conflicts, and no analysis of runtime overhead or performance bounds. Without these details the central assertion of feasible, consistent, and beneficial integration remains unexamined.
  2. [Manuscript body (no evaluation or methods section)] Manuscript body (no evaluation or methods section): The paper contains no algorithms, formal properties, empirical results, error analysis, or benchmarks to support that the approach avoids major technical or performance drawbacks. This absence directly undermines the argument that on-demand generation constitutes a practical path beyond fixed architectures.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract could more precisely delineate the novel elements of the pipeline versus prior work on agent personalization.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback, which identifies key areas where our high-level conceptual proposal can be strengthened. We agree that the current manuscript is primarily a position paper outlining a new paradigm and will revise it to include more concrete details on mechanisms, consistency strategies, and discussion of implementation considerations while preserving its conceptual focus.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and pipeline description] The claim that 'real-time crafting of AI personas can be systematically integrated within agent systems' (abstract) rests on an outline of user/task/context matching followed by persona generation and workflow integration, but supplies no mechanisms for persona generation (e.g., prompt engineering, retrieval, or fine-tuning), no procedures for maintaining inter-agent consistency or resolving role conflicts, and no analysis of runtime overhead or performance bounds. Without these details the central assertion of feasible, consistent, and beneficial integration remains unexamined.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript presents the pipeline at a conceptual level without specifying low-level mechanisms. In the revision, we will expand the pipeline section to include concrete examples: (1) persona generation via structured prompt engineering that incorporates user profiles, task requirements, and context vectors extracted from the workflow; (2) consistency maintenance through a shared context store and periodic role-alignment prompts during multi-agent coordination; and (3) a high-level runtime analysis noting that overhead is dominated by LLM inference calls (typically 1-3 additional calls per agent instantiation) with bounds dependent on model size. These additions will make the feasibility claim more concrete without requiring a full implementation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Manuscript body (no evaluation or methods section)] The paper contains no algorithms, formal properties, empirical results, error analysis, or benchmarks to support that the approach avoids major technical or performance drawbacks. This absence directly undermines the argument that on-demand generation constitutes a practical path beyond fixed architectures.

    Authors: The manuscript is intended as a conceptual contribution that identifies limitations of fixed architectures and sketches an alternative design paradigm. We agree that empirical validation would strengthen the practicality argument. In revision we will add a dedicated 'Implementation Considerations' section containing: pseudocode for the core pipeline steps (user/task/context matching, persona synthesis, workflow assembly), a discussion of potential drawbacks (e.g., role drift, latency), and proposed evaluation axes (task success rate, adaptation latency, user preference in controlled scenarios). Full-scale benchmarks and error analysis would require a follow-up systems paper with an implemented prototype; the current work focuses on opening the design space rather than claiming empirical superiority. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: conceptual proposal with no equations, fits, or self-referential derivations

full rationale

The paper advances a forward-looking argument for on-demand persona-based agent generation in multi-agent systems and outlines a high-level pipeline (user/task/context matching to persona generation to workflow integration). No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters, equations, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The central claim does not reduce to its own inputs by construction, nor does it invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior author work. The proposal remains self-contained as a design suggestion without statistical or definitional circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about the limitations of current hard-coded agent systems and the feasibility of dynamic persona integration, with no free parameters or independently evidenced new entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Today's agent systems typically rely on hard-coded agent architectures with fixed roles, coordination patterns, and interaction flows that limit end-user personalization.
    Presented as the motivating limitation in the abstract.
  • ad hoc to paper Dynamically crafting agents and personas at run-time can be systematically integrated to match user characteristics, task demands, and workflow context.
    Core assumption underlying the proposed pipeline without supporting derivation or evidence.
invented entities (1)
  • on-demand persona-based agent generation pipeline no independent evidence
    purpose: To enable real-time tailoring of multi-agent workflows to individual user needs and contexts.
    The main conceptual contribution introduced in the abstract; no independent falsifiable evidence is provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5446 in / 1570 out tokens · 48683 ms · 2026-05-07T06:34:32.431926+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Xiaohe Bo, Zeyu Zhang, Quanyu Dai, Xueyang Feng, Lei Wang, Rui Li, Xu Chen, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024. Reflective Multi-Agent Collaboration based on Large Language Models. InAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang (Eds.), Vol. 37. Curran Associates, Inc., 138595–13863...

    work page doi:10.52202/079017-4397 2024

  2. [2]

    Hongliu Cao. 2025. Writing Style Matters: An Examination of Bias and Fairness in Information Retrieval Systems. InProceedings of the Eighteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining(Hannover, Germany)(WSDM ’25). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 336–344. doi:10.1145/3701551.3703514

    work page doi:10.1145/3701551.3703514 2025

  3. [3]

    Ana Paula Chaves, Jesse Egbert, Toby Hocking, Eck Doerry, and Marco Aurelio Gerosa. 2022. Chatbots Language Design: The Influence of Language Variation on User Experience with Tourist Assistant Chatbots.ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact.29, 2, Article 13 (Jan. 2022), 38 pages. doi:10.1145/3487193

    work page doi:10.1145/3487193 2022

  4. [4]

    Ziluo Ding, Zeyuan Liu, Zhirui Fang, Kefan Su, Liwen Zhu, and Zongqing Lu. 2024. Multi-Agent Coordination via Multi-Level Communication. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, A. Globerson, L. Mackey, D. Belgrave, A. Fan, U. Paquet, J. Tomczak, and C. Zhang (Eds.), Vol. 37. Curran Associates, Inc., 118513–118539. doi:10.52202/079017-3763

    work page doi:10.52202/079017-3763 2024

  5. [5]

    Ela Elsholz, Jon Chamberlain, and Udo Kruschwitz. 2019. Exploring Language Style in Chatbots to Increase Perceived Product Value and User Engagement. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval(Glasgow, Scotland UK)(CHIIR ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 301–305. doi:10.1145/3295750.3298956

    work page doi:10.1145/3295750.3298956 2019

  6. [6]

    Yafeng Fan, Xiaohui Yue, Xiadan Zhang, and Luyao Zhang. 2026. Elaborate or Succinct? The Impact of AI Chatbots’ Language Style on Customers’ Satisfaction in Online Service.Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research21, 2 (2026). doi:10.3390/jtaer21020051

    work page doi:10.3390/jtaer21020051 2026

  7. [7]

    Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang

    Taicheng Guo, Xiuying Chen, Yaqi Wang, Ruidi Chang, Shichao Pei, Nitesh V. Chawla, Olaf Wiest, and Xiangliang Zhang. 2024. Large Language Model Based Multi-agents: A Survey of Progress and Challenges. InProceedings of the Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, IJCAI-24, Kate Larson (Ed.). International Joint Conferences on...

    work page doi:10.24963/ijcai.2024/890 2024

  8. [8]

    Yupu Hao, Pengfei Cao, Zhuoran Jin, Huanxuan Liao, Yubo Chen, Kang Liu, and Jun Zhao. 2025. Evaluating Personalized Tool-Augmented LLMs from the Perspectives of Personalization and Proactivity. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, ...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.1064 2025

  9. [9]

    Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar

    Dr. Sanjay Nakharu Prasad Kumar. 2025. Building Scalable and Reliable Agentic AI Systems: A Technical Blueprint for Autonomous Intelligence. Global Journal of Engineering and Technology Research(2025). [https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:283433037](https://api.semanticscholar. org/CorpusID:283433037)

    work page 2025

  10. [10]

    2024.Personalized Tutoring Through Conversational Agents

    Dejian Liu, Ronghuai Huang, Ying Chen, Michael Agyemang Adarkwah, Xiangling Zhang, Xin Li, Junjie Zhang, and Ting Da. 2024.Personalized Tutoring Through Conversational Agents. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, 59–85. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5826-5_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-97-5826-5_4 2024

  11. [11]

    Jiongnan Liu, Yutao Zhu, Shuting Wang, Xiaochi Wei, Erxue Min, Yu Lu, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, and Zhicheng Dou. 2025. LLMs + Persona-Plug = Personalized LLMs. InProceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Wanxiang Che, Joyce Nabende, Ekaterina Shutova, and Mohammad Taher Pilehvar (Ed...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.acl-long.461 2025

  12. [12]

    Marlene Lutz, Indira Sen, Georg Ahnert, Elisa Rogers, and Markus Strohmaier. 2025. The Prompt Makes the Person(a): A Systematic Evaluation of Sociodemographic Persona Prompting for Large Language Models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2025, Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng (...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025.findings-emnlp.1261 2025

  13. [13]

    Armand Nicolicioiu, Eugenia Iofinova, Andrej Jovanovic, Eldar Kurtic, Mahdi Nikdan, Andrei Panferov, Ilia Markov, Nir Shavit, and Dan Alistarh

    work page

  14. [14]

    arXiv:2407.10994 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10994

    Panza: Design and Analysis of a Fully-Local Personalized Text Writing Assistant. arXiv:2407.10994 [cs.CL] https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10994

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Urmila R

    Dr. Urmila R. Pol. 2025. Generative AI, AI Agents, and Agentic AI : An Overview of Current AI Technologies.International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology(2025). [https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:283379174](https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID: 283379174)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Kimberly Truong, Riccardo Fogliato, Hoda Heidari, and Steven Wu. 2025. Persona-Augmented Benchmarking: Evaluating LLMs Across Diverse Writing Styles. InProceedings of the 2025 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Christos Christodoulopoulos, Tanmoy Chakraborty, Carolyn Rose, and Violet Peng (Eds.). Association for Computational ...

    work page doi:10.18653/v1/2025 2025

  17. [17]

    and Li, Xian , month = jun, year =

    Weizhi Zhang, Xinyang Zhang, Chenwei Zhang, Liangwei Yang, Jingbo Shang, Zhepei Wei, Henry Peng Zou, Zijie Huang, Zhengyang Wang, Yifan Gao, Xiaoman Pan, Lian Xiong, Jingguo Liu, Philip S. Yu, and Xian Li. 2025. PersonaAgent: When Large Language Model Agents Meet Personalization at Test Time. arXiv:2506.06254 [cs.AI] https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.06254

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Theresa Zobel and Christoph Meinel. 2025. Chatbot Personas as a Gateway to Enhanced Learning Experiences. InAdvances in Information and Communication, Kohei Arai (Ed.). Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham, 208–220. 6

    work page 2025