pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.00976 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-01 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE· gr-qc

Recognition: unknown

Self-acceleration of Hardening Binaries

Giovanni Maria Tomaselli , Thomas F. M. Spieksma

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 19:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HEgr-qc
keywords binary hardeningsupermassive black hole binariesdynamical frictionthree-body scatteringeccentricity growthfinal parsec problemself-accelerationorbital precession
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hardening binaries in a uniform medium accelerate their own center of mass due to orbital asymmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that a Keplerian binary ejects lighter particles through gravitational slingshots and thereby experiences a net force on its center of mass from the surrounding medium. This self-acceleration, together with induced apsidal precession and orbital-plane rotation, occurs even in a perfectly uniform and isotropic bath because the binary's own orbital shape breaks symmetry. The combined action of self-acceleration, precession, and dynamical friction drives the center of mass along an outward spiral. For supermassive black hole binaries the displacement can reach the radius of influence, offsetting them from galaxy centers and enlarging the stellar loss cone. All binaries grow in eccentricity once long-lived encounters are retained, overturning earlier reports of circularization.

Core claim

A Keplerian binary immersed in a bath of lighter particles hardens by ejecting them through gravitational slingshots. The medium exerts a net force on the binary's center of mass, induces apsidal precession, and rotates the orbital plane when the center-of-mass velocity has an out-of-plane component. These deterministic effects persist even in a perfectly uniform and isotropic medium because the binary's asymmetry provides the propulsion. The interplay of self-acceleration, precession, and dynamical friction drives the center of mass along an outward spiral. All binaries undergo eccentricity growth once long-lived encounters are included.

What carries the argument

The binary's orbital asymmetry in three-body scatterings, which breaks the symmetry of an otherwise uniform isotropic medium and produces a net force on the center of mass.

If this is right

  • The center of mass follows an outward spiral trajectory under the combined influence of self-acceleration and dynamical friction.
  • Supermassive black hole binaries reach displacements comparable to the radius of influence and appear offset from galactic centers.
  • The enlarged stellar loss cone supplies more stars for ejection and helps resolve the final-parsec problem.
  • Eccentricity grows for binaries of all mass ratios once long-lived scatterings are retained.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Revised population models for gravitational-wave sources should include center-of-mass motion when predicting merger rates and waveforms.
  • The same asymmetry-driven propulsion may operate in other gravitational few-body systems embedded in isotropic baths, such as stellar binaries in dense clusters.
  • Observational searches for offset active galactic nuclei could directly test the predicted displacement scale.

Load-bearing premise

Finite-duration three-body scattering experiments accurately capture the secular long-term dynamics in the continuous-medium limit without truncation artifacts or missing higher-order effects.

What would settle it

Long-term N-body simulations that track center-of-mass displacement of a hardening binary in a uniform stellar background without truncating encounters, or observations of spatial offsets between supermassive black holes and their host galaxy centers after mergers.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.00976 by Giovanni Maria Tomaselli, Thomas F. M. Spieksma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Visualization of the slingshot of a particle off a binary view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Hardening rate view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. In-plane components of the acceleration parameter view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Shape of the orbits (blue lines) and acceleration parameter view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Hardening rate view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Components of the acceleration parameter view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Evolution parameters as a function of the integration-time cutoff, quantified in units of binary periods as view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Evolution parameters as functions of mass ratio view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Evolution of the binary parameters for view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Trajectory of the binary’s CoM, for the same param view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Eccentricity growth rate view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Effective squared minimum impact parameter view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: shows H and K as functions of q at fixed a/ah = 1 and a/ah = 0.1, for e = 0.6. The colored mark￾ers denote data points digitized from view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: summarizes the results. The left panel shows the components of the CoM velocity. The out-of-plane component Vz remains consistent with zero throughout the simulation, in agreement with the symmetry argu￾ment of Sec. II B. The right panel shows the trajectory of the binary’s CoM in the orbital plane, where the binary follows the same outward spiral described in Sec. VI. For comparison, we overlay the predi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A Keplerian binary immersed in a bath of lighter particles hardens by ejecting them through gravitational slingshots. This process drives, for example, the evolution of supermassive black hole binaries following galaxy mergers, and has long been described with just two parameters: the hardening rate and the eccentricity growth rate. Here we show that the secular dynamics is substantially richer. Combining symmetry arguments with extensive three-body scattering experiments, we demonstrate that the medium exerts a net force on the binary's center of mass (CoM), induces apsidal precession, and rotates the orbital plane when the CoM velocity has an out-of-plane component. Remarkably, these deterministic effects persist even in a perfectly uniform and isotropic medium, as the binary's own asymmetry provides the propulsion. The interplay of self-acceleration, precession, and dynamical friction drives the CoM along an outward spiral. For supermassive black hole binaries, this displacement dominates over Brownian motion and approaches the radius of influence, suggesting they may be significantly offset from their host galaxies' centers. The displacement also enlarges the stellar loss cone, with direct implications for the final-parsec problem. We further show that the previously reported circularization of small-mass-ratio binaries is a numerical artifact of truncating long-lived encounters: all binaries undergo eccentricity growth. Our results enrich the standard picture of binary hardening and have implications in a variety of astrophysical contexts, including gravitational-wave source populations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that a Keplerian binary hardening via gravitational slingshots in a uniform isotropic bath experiences deterministic net force on its center of mass (CoM), apsidal precession, and orbital-plane rotation arising from the binary's intrinsic asymmetry. These effects, combined with dynamical friction, drive the CoM along an outward spiral. The work further asserts that eccentricity grows for all mass ratios, with prior reports of circularization for small mass ratios being artifacts of truncating long-lived encounters in three-body simulations. The claims rest on symmetry arguments plus averaged outcomes from extensive three-body scattering experiments, with implications for supermassive black hole binary offsets, loss-cone dynamics, and the final-parsec problem.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the manuscript would meaningfully expand the standard two-parameter description of binary hardening by introducing secular CoM self-acceleration and precession effects that persist even in idealized media. This could alter predictions for binary displacements relative to galactic centers and gravitational-wave source populations. The correction to the circularization artifact is a clear contribution, and the combination of symmetry reasoning with numerical experiments is a methodological strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods (three-body scattering)] Methods section on three-body scattering experiments: the manuscript correctly identifies truncation of long-lived encounters as the source of the prior spurious circularization result, yet the same finite-duration cutoff could systematically bias the reported net CoM force, precession rates, and plane rotation. A convergence test varying maximum encounter time (or inclusion of longer-lived trajectories) is required to confirm these secular effects are not truncation artifacts.
  2. [Symmetry arguments] Symmetry arguments and continuous-medium limit: the claim that deterministic propulsion persists in a perfectly uniform isotropic bath assumes the bath remains unperturbed by the binary. The binary's gravity necessarily induces wakes and local density gradients, so the paper must demonstrate that these self-consistent perturbations do not invalidate the symmetry-based net force or alter the reported rates.
  3. [Implications section] Implications for SMBH binaries: the assertion that CoM displacement dominates Brownian motion and approaches the radius of influence depends on the magnitude of the self-acceleration. Explicit scaling relations or parameter comparisons (e.g., versus binary mass, hardening rate, or galactic density profile) are needed to substantiate this for realistic systems.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the mass ratios, encounter duration cutoffs, and number of scatterings used for each panel to allow direct assessment of the numerical support.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'all binaries undergo eccentricity growth' but does not specify the mass-ratio range explored; this should be clarified for precision.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful and constructive comments, which have helped clarify several aspects of our work. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section on three-body scattering experiments: the manuscript correctly identifies truncation of long-lived encounters as the source of the prior spurious circularization result, yet the same finite-duration cutoff could systematically bias the reported net CoM force, precession rates, and plane rotation. A convergence test varying maximum encounter time (or inclusion of longer-lived trajectories) is required to confirm these secular effects are not truncation artifacts.

    Authors: We appreciate this suggestion. Although our analysis focused on the eccentricity evolution, we recognize the potential for bias in the secular quantities due to the encounter cutoff. To address this, we will perform additional numerical experiments varying the maximum encounter time by factors of 2 and 5 to verify convergence of the net CoM force, precession rates, and plane rotation. The results will be documented in the revised Methods section and a supplementary figure. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Symmetry arguments and continuous-medium limit: the claim that deterministic propulsion persists in a perfectly uniform isotropic bath assumes the bath remains unperturbed by the binary. The binary's gravity necessarily induces wakes and local density gradients, so the paper must demonstrate that these self-consistent perturbations do not invalidate the symmetry-based net force or alter the reported rates.

    Authors: The symmetry arguments are based on the statistical properties of encounters in an unperturbed isotropic bath, treating particles as test particles. In reality, the binary does induce local perturbations. However, because the hardening is driven by rare, close encounters that dominate the momentum transfer, and the medium is assumed dilute, the average effect remains as calculated. We will revise the discussion to explicitly state the test-particle approximation and note that self-consistent effects would require more advanced simulations, but are not expected to eliminate the net force due to the persistent asymmetry. revision: partial

  3. Referee: Implications for SMBH binaries: the assertion that CoM displacement dominates Brownian motion and approaches the radius of influence depends on the magnitude of the self-acceleration. Explicit scaling relations or parameter comparisons (e.g., versus binary mass, hardening rate, or galactic density profile) are needed to substantiate this for realistic systems.

    Authors: We agree that more quantitative support is needed. In the revised version, we will add explicit scaling relations in the Implications section. For example, the self-acceleration scales with the hardening rate and binary parameters, leading to a displacement that can exceed the Brownian motion amplitude by an order of magnitude for typical SMBH binary masses and galactic densities, reaching a significant fraction of the influence radius. We will include a parameter study or table comparing these for different systems. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results rest on independent symmetry arguments and numerical scattering data.

full rationale

The paper derives its claims of CoM self-acceleration, apsidal precession, orbital-plane rotation, and eccentricity growth directly from symmetry considerations plus averaged outcomes of three-body scattering experiments. These experiments serve as the empirical input rather than a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, and no load-bearing step reduces by construction to a self-citation chain or self-defined quantity. The identification of prior circularization as a truncation artifact is presented as a methodological correction based on the same experimental framework, without circular redefinition of inputs. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks of symmetry and scattering statistics.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on symmetry arguments applied to three-body gravitational scattering in a uniform isotropic medium of lighter particles. No explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, though the traditional hardening description uses two rates. The work assumes Newtonian gravity and that finite simulations extrapolate to the secular limit.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Newtonian gravity governs the three-body interactions between the binary and lighter particles
    Implicit foundation for all scattering experiments described in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The surrounding medium can be treated as perfectly uniform and isotropic
    Explicitly stated as the condition under which the new deterministic effects still appear.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5561 in / 1644 out tokens · 50190 ms · 2026-05-09T19:00:32.862919+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Physical scales We make use of the empirical relation between the massMof a SMBH and the velocity dispersionσof the stars around it, known asM–σrelation. 3 We use the pa- rameters from [39], according to which the relation takes the form M≈10 8.49M⊙ σ 200 km/s 4.38 .(62) The formation, evolution and merger of SMBH binaries is a complex process involving d...

  2. [2]

    smooth medium

    Brownian motion and terminal velocity As stated in Sec. II A, all our results are valid in the “smooth medium” limit, that is,m→0,n→ ∞, with ρ=mnconstant. A granular medium, composed of stars whose mass ism̸= 0, introduces stochasticity in the evo- lution of the binary [13]. One manifestation is a Brow- nian motion of the binary’s CoM, whose typical veloc...

  3. [3]

    external

    CoM motion and the final parsec problem Efficient stellar hardening of a SMBH binary relies on a continuous supply of stars on low-angular-momentum or- bits, which come close enough to the binary to participate in a three-body interaction and be slingshotted away. Be- cause these stars are ejected after one such interaction, the rate of three-body scatter...

  4. [4]

    The low- frequency portion of the PTA spectrum is sensitive to en- vironmental effects, such as the interaction of the binary with its stellar background

    GW signals A population of inspiraling SMBH binaries is believed to source the stochastic GW background recently de- tected by Pulsar Timing Arrays (PTA) [44–49]. The low- frequency portion of the PTA spectrum is sensitive to en- vironmental effects, such as the interaction of the binary with its stellar background. This part of the signal has indeed been...

  5. [5]

    Small-mass-ratio binaries Intermediate mass-ratio inspirals (IMRIs,q∼10 −2 − 10−4) and extreme mass-ratio inspirals (EMRIs,q≲ 10−4) are prime targets for LISA [51]. These systems combine small mass ratios with potentially large eccen- tricities, placing them in the regime where our new re- sults are most pronounced: the acceleration parameter Pand the pre...

  6. [6]

    Any asymmetric binary moving through a medium will, in general, scatter that medium anisotrop- ically and recoil

    Binaries in gaseous environments The symmetry argument underlying the CoM force and apsidal precession is not restricted to stellar back- grounds. Any asymmetric binary moving through a medium will, in general, scatter that medium anisotrop- ically and recoil. This suggests that analogous secular effects may operate for binaries embedded in gas, such as s...

  7. [7]

    At the trap location Rtrap ∼10 3GM•/c2, the midplane density and sound speed areρ∼10 −9g/cm3 andc s ∼231km/s [61, 66], re- spectively

    in a Sirko-Goodman disk [65] around an SMBH of massM • = 108M⊙, with accretion rate ˙M• = 0.5 ˙MEdd and viscosity parameterα= 0.01. At the trap location Rtrap ∼10 3GM•/c2, the midplane density and sound speed areρ∼10 −9g/cm3 andc s ∼231km/s [61, 66], re- spectively. Identifyingσ∼c s, the hard-binary scale (4) becomes ah ∼0.25 AU M 60M⊙ q (1 +q) 2 231 km/s...

  8. [8]

    For example, a massive binary evolving within a dark matter spike [69] would experience the same self-acceleration and precession

    Other environments In a similar fashion, our results can be applied to other environments. For example, a massive binary evolving within a dark matter spike [69] would experience the same self-acceleration and precession. Whether the dark matter density is ever large enough for these effects to be dynamically important depends on the spike’s pro- file, wh...

    work page doi:10.61686/wykdb06497

  9. [9]

    As a default setting, we usep= 0.01

    Convergence ofRK45 The time step in ourRK45is chosen such that the rela- tive change of the particle’s velocity between consecutive time steps,|∆v|/|v|, does not exceed a given threshold p. As a default setting, we usep= 0.01. We tested con- vergence by varyingpin the range 0.002≤p≤0.05. We focus on the eccentricity growth rateK, which we find to be the e...

  10. [10]

    VV,Y4, andPiare all symplectic integrators

    Other integrators We also tested other numerical routines, including: •Velocity Verlet (VV) [72] and Yoshida 4th order (Y4) [73]; •Pihajoki’s integrator (Pi) [74]; •Bulirsch-Stoer (BS) [75], the same integrator used in [11]. VV,Y4, andPiare all symplectic integrators. However, this property is broken inVVandY4when an adaptive time step is used, which is n...

  11. [11]

    the star exits the sphere of radiusr sph = 50awith positive energy

  12. [12]

    the elapsed integration time exceeds a maximum valueT max

  13. [13]

    Only scatterings satisfying condition 1 are considered re- solved and contribute to the measured rates

    the cumulative time spent by the particle inside the sphere of radiusr sph = 50aexceeds 2×10 4 binary orbital periods. Only scatterings satisfying condition 1 are considered re- solved and contribute to the measured rates. Particles removed by conditions 2 or 3 are instead discarded. The first difference between our setup and those works concerns the maxi...

  14. [14]

    Mean” denotes the average over velocity bins; “worst

    When condition 3 is imposed, our results reproduce to resolve. In the restricted three-body problem adopted in this work, long-lived encounters are no more expensive per unit time than short ones. 7 As reported throughout, we typically setN max = 1011/(2π) in our simulations. However, to truly isolate the effect of condition 3, this is the one instance in...

  15. [15]

    2 0. 3 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 −0. 02 0

  16. [16]

    02 a/a h V /σ Vx/σ Vy/σ Vz/σ |V |/σ −0. 004 0 0. 004 0

  17. [17]

    008 x/ (σ Th) y/ (σ Th) start end FIG. 14. Results of theN-body simulations for a binary with the same parameters as in Figs. 9 and 10 (q= 0.2,e 0 = 0.5, anda 0/ah = 0.6).Left panel: components of the CoM velocity. The solid curves show theN-body ensemble mean over 20 realizations, and the shaded band denotes the 1σscatter across realizations. The dotted ...

  18. [18]

    M. C. Begelman, R. D. Blandford, and M. J. Rees, Mas- sive black hole binaries in active galactic nuclei, Nature 287, 307 (1980)

    1980

  19. [19]

    Merritt and M

    D. Merritt and M. Milosavljevic, Massive black hole bi- nary evolution, Living Rev. Rel.8, 8 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0410364

    work page arXiv 2005

  20. [20]

    W. C. Saslaw, M. J. Valtonen, and S. J. Aarseth, The Gravitational Slingshot and the Structure of Extragalac- tic Radio Sources, Astrophys. J.190, 253 (1974)

    1974

  21. [21]

    G. D. Quinlan, The dynamical evolution of massive black hole binaries - I. hardening in a fixed stellar background, New Astron.1, 35 (1996), arXiv:astro-ph/9601092

    work page arXiv 1996

  22. [22]

    Sesana, F

    A. Sesana, F. Haardt, and P. Madau, Interaction of mas- sive black hole binaries with their stellar environment. 1. Ejection of hypervelocity stars, Astrophys. J.651, 392 (2006), arXiv:astro-ph/0604299

    work page arXiv 2006

  23. [23]

    Sesana, F

    A. Sesana, F. Haardt, and P. Madau, Interaction of mas- sive black hole binaries with their stellar environment. 2. Loss-cone depletion and binary orbital decay, Astrophys. J.660, 546 (2007), arXiv:astro-ph/0612265

    work page arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Sesana, F

    A. Sesana, F. Haardt, and P. Madau, Interaction of mas- sive black hole binaries with their stellar environment. 3. Scattering of bound stars, Astrophys. J.686, 432 (2008), arXiv:0710.4301 [astro-ph]

    work page arXiv 2008

  25. [25]

    Sesana, A

    A. Sesana, A. Gualandris, and M. Dotti, Massive black hole binary eccentricity in rotating stellar systems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.415, 35 (2011), arXiv:1105.0670 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Sesana and F

    A. Sesana and F. M. Khan, Scattering experiments meet N-body – I. A practical recipe for the evolution of massive black hole binaries in stellar environments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.454, L66 (2015), arXiv:1505.02062 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2015

  27. [27]

    Rasskazov, G

    A. Rasskazov, G. Fragione, N. W. C. Leigh, H. Tagawa, A. Sesana, A. Price-Whelan, and E. M. Rossi, Hyperve- locity stars from a supermassive black hole–intermediate- mass black hole binary, Astrophys. J.878, 17 (2019), arXiv:1810.12354 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Bonetti, A

    M. Bonetti, A. Rasskazov, A. Sesana, M. Dotti, F. Haardt, N. W. C. Leigh, M. Arca Sedda, G. Fragione, and E. Rossi, On the eccentricity evolution of massive black hole binaries in stellar backgrounds, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.493, L114 (2020), arXiv:2001.02231 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  29. [29]

    Gualandris, F

    A. Gualandris, F. M. Khan, E. Bortolas, M. Bonetti, A. Sesana, P. Berczik, and K. Holley-Bockelmann, Ec- centricity evolution of massive black hole binaries from formation to coalescence, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 511, 4753 (2022), arXiv:2201.08646 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    Merritt, Brownian motion of a massive binary, Astro- phys

    D. Merritt, Brownian motion of a massive binary, Astro- phys. J.556, 245 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0012264

    work page arXiv 2001

  31. [31]

    Merritt, Rotational Brownian Motion of a Mas- sive Binary, Astrophys

    D. Merritt, Rotational Brownian Motion of a Mas- sive Binary, Astrophys. J.568, 998 (2002), arXiv:astro- ph/0107569

    work page arXiv 2002

  32. [32]

    Chatterjee, L

    P. Chatterjee, L. Hernquist, and A. Loeb, Effects of Wandering on the Coalescence of Black Hole Bina- ries in Galactic Centers, Astrophys. J.592, 32 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0302573

    work page arXiv 2003

  33. [33]

    Bortolas, A

    E. Bortolas, A. Gualandris, M. Dotti, M. Spera, and M. Mapelli, Brownian motion of massive black hole bina- ries and the final parsec problem, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.461, 1072 (2016), arXiv:1606.06728 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2016

  34. [34]

    F. M. Khan, M. A. Mirza, and K. Holley-Bockelmann, Inward bound: the incredible journey of massive black holes as they pair and merge - I. The effect of mass ra- tio in flattened rotating galactic nuclei, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.492, 256 (2020), arXiv:1911.07946 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  35. [35]

    Varisco, E

    L. Varisco, E. Bortolas, M. Dotti, and A. Sesana, Stellar hardening of massive black hole binaries: the impact of the host rotation, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.508, 1533 (2021), arXiv:2104.14570 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Chatterjee, L

    P. Chatterjee, L. Hernquist, and A. Loeb, Dynamics of a massive black hole at the center of a dense stellar system, Astrophys. J.572, 371 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0107287

    work page arXiv 2002

  37. [37]

    Chatterjee, L

    P. Chatterjee, L. Hernquist, and A. Loeb, Brownian mo- tion in gravitationally-interacting systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 121103 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0202257

    work page arXiv 2002

  38. [38]

    Milosavljevic and D

    M. Milosavljevic and D. Merritt, Long term evolution of massive black hole binaries, Astrophys. J.596, 860 (2003), arXiv:astro-ph/0212459

    work page arXiv 2003

  39. [39]

    Chatterjee, L

    P. Chatterjee, L. Hernquist, and A. Loeb, Effects of wan- dering on the coalescence of black hole binaries in galac- tic centers, Astrophys. J.592, 32 (2003), arXiv:astro- ph/0302573

    work page arXiv 2003

  40. [40]

    Laun and D

    F. Laun and D. Merritt, Brownian motion of black holes in dense nuclei, Astron. J.133, 533 (2007), arXiv:astro- ph/0408029

    work page arXiv 2007

  41. [41]

    Berczik, D

    P. Berczik, D. Merritt, and R. Spurzem, Long-term evo- lution of massive black hole binaries. 2. Binary evolution in low-density galaxies, Astrophys. J.633, 680 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0507260

    work page arXiv 2005

  42. [42]

    Di Cintio, L

    P. Di Cintio, L. Ciotti, and C. Nipoti, Brownian mo- tion of supermassive black holes in galaxy cores, in Star Clusters: From the Milky Way to the Early Uni- verse, IAU Symposium, Vol. 351, edited by A. Bragaglia, M. Davies, A. Sills, and E. Vesperini (2020) pp. 93–96, arXiv:1908.04283 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  43. [43]

    Chandrasekhar, Dynamical Friction

    S. Chandrasekhar, Dynamical Friction. I. General Con- siderations: the Coefficient of Dynamical Friction, Astro- phys. J.97, 255 (1943)

    1943

  44. [44]

    J. G. Hills, The effect of low-velocity, low-mass intruders (collisionless gas) on the dynamical evolution of a binary system, Astrophys. J.88, 1269 (1983)

    1983

  45. [45]

    Cardoso and C

    V. Cardoso and C. F. B. Macedo, Drifting through the medium: kicks and self-propulsion of binaries within ac- cretion discs and other environments, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.498, 1963 (2020), arXiv:2008.01091 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 1963

  46. [46]

    Milosavljevic and D

    M. Milosavljevic and D. Merritt, Formation of galac- tic nuclei, Astrophys. J.563, 34 (2001), arXiv:astro- ph/0103350

    work page arXiv 2001

  47. [47]

    T. F. M. Spieksma and G. M. Tomaselli, BBH- stars,https://github.com/thomasspieksma/BBH_stars (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Hamilton and S

    C. Hamilton and S. Modak, Eccentricity dynamics of wide binaries–ii. the effect of stellar encounters and con- straints on formation channels, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc532, 2425 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Gualandris, M

    A. Gualandris, M. Dotti, and A. Sesana, Massive black hole binary plane reorientation in rotating stellar sys- tems, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.420, 38 (2012), 28 arXiv:1109.3707 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2012

  50. [50]

    Rasskazov and D

    A. Rasskazov and D. Merritt, Evolution Of Binary Su- permassive Black Holes In Rotating Nuclei, Astrophys. J.837, 135 (2017), arXiv:1610.08555 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Berczik, M

    P. Berczik, M. A. Sedda, M. Sobolenko, M. Ishchenko, O. Sobodar, and R. Spurzem, Merging of unequal mass binary black holes in non-axisymmetric galactic nuclei, Astron. Astrophys.665, A86 (2022), arXiv:2008.04342 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2022

  52. [52]

    Binney and S

    J. Binney and S. Tremaine,Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition(2008)

    2008

  53. [53]

    P. J. E. Peebles, Star Distribution Near a Collapsed Ob- ject, Astrophys. J.178, 371 (1972)

    1972

  54. [54]

    G. D. Quinlan and L. Hernquist, The Dynamical evo- lution of massive black hole binaries. 2. Selfconsis- tent N body integrations, New Astron.2, 533 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9706298

    work page arXiv 1997

  55. [55]

    Makino and Y

    J. Makino and Y. Funato, Evolution of massive black hole binaries, Astrophys. J.602, 93 (2004), arXiv:astro- ph/0307327

    work page arXiv 2004

  56. [56]

    Coevolution (Or Not) of Supermassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies

    J. Kormendy and L. C. Ho, Coevolution (Or Not) of Su- permassive Black Holes and Host Galaxies, Ann. Rev. As- tron. Astrophys.51, 511 (2013), arXiv:1304.7762 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  57. [57]

    Dosopoulou and F

    F. Dosopoulou and F. Antonini, Dynamical friction and the evolution of Supermassive Black hole Binaries: the final hundred-parsec problem, Astrophys. J.840, 31 (2017), arXiv:1611.06573 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2017

  58. [58]

    Gualandris, J

    A. Gualandris, J. I. Read, W. Dehnen, and E. Bortolas, Collisionless loss-cone refilling: there is no final parsec problem, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464, 2301 (2017), arXiv:1609.09383 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    F. M. Khan, A. Just, and D. Merritt, Efficient Merger of Binary Supermassive Black Holes in Merging Galax- ies, Astrophys. J.732, 89 (2011), arXiv:1103.0272 [astro- ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    Preto, I

    M. Preto, I. Berentzen, P. Berczik, and R. Spurzem, Fast coalescence of massive black hole binaries from merg- ers of galactic nuclei: implications for low-frequency gravitational-wave astrophysics, Astrophys. J. Lett.732, L26 (2011), arXiv:1102.4855 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2011

  61. [61]

    The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L8 (2023), arXiv:2306.16213 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA:), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - III. Search for gravitational wave signals, Astron. Astrophys. 678, A50 (2023), arXiv:2306.16214 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  63. [63]

    D. J. Reardonet al., Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pul- sar Timing Array, Astrophys. J. Lett.951, L6 (2023), arXiv:2306.16215 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  64. [64]

    Searching for the nano-Hertz stochastic gravitational wave background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I

    H. Xuet al., Searching for the Nano-Hertz Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background with the Chinese Pulsar Timing Array Data Release I, Res. Astron. Astrophys. 23, 075024 (2023), arXiv:2306.16216 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023

  65. [65]

    Agazie et al

    G. Agazieet al.(NANOGrav), The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Constraints on Supermassive Black Hole Bina- ries from the Gravitational-wave Background, Astrophys. J. Lett.952, L37 (2023), arXiv:2306.16220 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2023

  66. [66]

    Antoniadis et al

    J. Antoniadiset al.(EPTA, InPTA), The second data release from the European Pulsar Timing Array - IV. Implications for massive black holes, dark matter, and the early Universe, Astron. Astrophys.685, A94 (2024), arXiv:2306.16227 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  67. [67]

    Chenet al., Inference on inner galaxy struc- ture via gravitational waves from supermassive bina- ries, Nature Astron

    Y. Chenet al., Inference on inner galaxy struc- ture via gravitational waves from supermassive bina- ries, Nature Astron. 10.1038/s41550-026-02782-0 (2026), arXiv:2411.05906 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-026-02782-0 2026

  68. [68]

    LISA Definition Study Report

    M. Colpiet al.(LISA), LISA Definition Study Report, (2024), arXiv:2402.07571 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2024

  69. [69]

    Science with the space-based interferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals

    S. Babak, J. Gair, A. Sesana, E. Barausse, C. F. Sop- uerta, C. P. L. Berry, E. Berti, P. Amaro-Seoane, A. Pe- titeau, and A. Klein, Science with the space-based inter- ferometer LISA. V: Extreme mass-ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D95, 103012 (2017), arXiv:1703.09722 [gr-qc]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Mancieri, L

    D. Mancieri, L. Broggi, M. Vinciguerra, A. Sesana, and M. Bonetti, Eccentricity distribution of extreme mass ratio inspirals, Phys. Rev. D113, 043062 (2026), arXiv:2509.02394 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2026

  71. [71]

    P. C. Peters and J. Mathews, Gravitational radiation from point masses in a Keplerian orbit, Phys. Rev.131, 435 (1963)

    1963

  72. [72]

    P. C. Peters, Gravitational Radiation and the Motion of Two Point Masses, Phys. Rev.136, B1224 (1964)

    1964

  73. [73]

    Torres-Orjuela, V

    A. Torres-Orjuela, V. V´ azquez-Aceves, and T.-X. Wang, Detection of Intermediate-mass Ratio Inspirals in Glob- ular Clusters: Revealing the Brownian Motion with Gravitational Waves, Astrophys. J.986, 155 (2025), arXiv:2501.13466 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Bartos, B

    I. Bartos, B. Kocsis, Z. Haiman, and S. M´ arka, Rapid and Bright Stellar-mass Binary Black Hole Mergers in Active Galactic Nuclei, Astrophys. J.835, 165 (2017), arXiv:1602.03831 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2017

  75. [75]

    N. C. Stone, B. D. Metzger, and Z. Haiman, Assisted inspirals of stellar mass black holes embedded in AGN discs: solving the ‘final au problem’, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.464, 946 (2017), arXiv:1602.04226 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2017

  76. [76]

    N. W. C. Leighet al., On the rate of black hole bi- nary mergers in galactic nuclei due to dynamical hard- ening, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.474, 5672 (2018), arXiv:1711.10494 [astro-ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2018

  77. [77]

    Mckernanet al., Constraining Stellar-mass Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks Detectable with LIGO, Astro- phys

    B. Mckernanet al., Constraining Stellar-mass Black Hole Mergers in AGN Disks Detectable with LIGO, Astro- phys. J.866, 66 (2018), arXiv:1702.07818 [astro-ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2018

  78. [78]

    Secunda, J

    A. Secunda, J. Bellovary, M.-M. Mac Low, K. E. Saavik Ford, B. McKernan, N. Leigh, W. Lyra, and Z. S´ andor, Orbital Migration of Interacting Stellar Mass Black Holes in Disks around Supermassive Black Holes, Astrophys. J.878, 85 (2019), arXiv:1807.02859 [astro- ph.HE]

    work page arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Tagawa, Z

    H. Tagawa, Z. Haiman, and B. Kocsis, Formation and Evolution of Compact Object Binaries in AGN Disks, Astrophys. J.898, 25 (2020), arXiv:1912.08218 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

  80. [80]

    Gr¨ obner, W

    M. Gr¨ obner, W. Ishibashi, S. Tiwari, M. Haney, and P. Jetzer, Binary black hole mergers in AGN accretion discs: gravitational wave rate density estimates, Astron. Astrophys.638, A119 (2020), arXiv:2005.03571 [astro- ph.GA]

    work page arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.