arxiv: 2605.01992 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-03 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Reviving Motivated Inflationary Potentials with K-inflation in the light of ACT

Milad Solbi , Daris Samart , Peera Simakachorn

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-09 16:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.CO

keywords K-inflationalpha-attractor T-modelnatural inflationscalar spectral indexSwampland conjecturesreheatinggravitational wavesACT data

0 comments

The pith

A field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term revives α-attractor T-models and natural inflation to match the higher scalar spectral index favored by ACT data.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Recent ACT data prefer a higher scalar spectral index ns than standard versions of α-attractor T-models and natural inflation can produce, creating tension with observations. This paper introduces a K-inflation framework in which a field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) supplies additional friction during inflation. The extra friction modifies the slow-roll parameters enough to move both models into the region allowed by Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 constraints for suitable parameter choices. The authors compute the reheating equation-of-state parameter without relying on power-law approximations and test consistency with the Swampland distance and de Sitter conjectures. The two models then produce different reheating behaviors and gravitational-wave spectral tilts that future detectors could distinguish.

Core claim

In this K-inflation framework the non-minimal kinetic coupling supplies extra friction that shifts the α-attractor T-model with n=2 into the observationally favored region for β∼O(10) and α≳O(10^{-3}) to satisfy Swampland criteria, while natural inflation with n=4,5 becomes compatible for α≲7,8 and β≲−1. These parameter choices yield matter-like reheating and a red-tilted gravitational-wave background for the T-model, versus stiff reheating and a blue-tilted gravitational-wave background for natural inflation that could be accessible to LISA, Cosmic Explorer, Einstein Telescope, DECIGO and BBO while obeying BBN and ΔNeff limits.

What carries the argument

The field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) that augments the friction term in the inflaton equation of motion beyond the canonical case.

Load-bearing premise

The specific functional form chosen for the non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) is assumed to be a theoretically motivated effective description rather than a phenomenological choice tuned to fit the data.

What would settle it

A measurement of the primordial gravitational-wave spectral index that is inconsistent with the red tilt predicted for the viable T-model parameters or the blue tilt predicted for the viable natural-inflation parameters would rule out the proposed mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01992 by Daris Samart, Milad Solbi, Peera Simakachorn.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: FIG. 1. Reheating bounds on the number of efolds view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. The evolution of the instantaneous equation of state parameter in Eq. ( view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: FIG. 3 view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Assuming view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. The evolution of the equation of state parameter view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: FIG. 7. Assuming view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: FIG. 8. Spectra of inflationary GWB from the view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: FIG. 9. Detectability of inflationary GWB in the view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: FIG. 10. The range of reheating temperatures view at source ↗

**Figure 11.** Figure 11: FIG. 11 view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: FIG. 12. Similar to Fig view at source ↗

**Figure 13.** Figure 13: FIG. 13. Same as Fig view at source ↗

**Figure 14.** Figure 14: FIG. 14. The range of reheating temperatures view at source ↗

**Figure 15.** Figure 15: FIG. 15. Comparison of the primordial tensor power spectra calculated from the numerical result [using the view at source ↗

**Figure 16.** Figure 16: FIG. 16. Comparable to Fig view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent ACT data favor a higher scalar spectral index $n_s$, placing models such as $\alpha$-attractor T-models and natural Inflation in tension with current observations. We propose a K-inflation framework with a field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term $G(\phi)$ that reconciles these models with the latest Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 constraints. Our analysis includes a refined calculation of the reheating equation-of-state parameter $w_{\rm re}$, avoids standard power-law approximations, and tests consistency with the Swampland Distance and de Sitter Conjectures. We find that the additional friction from the non-minimal kinetic coupling shifts both models into the favored observational regions. For the $\alpha$-attractor T-model with $n=2$, viable solutions occur for $\beta\sim \mathcal{O}(10)$, with Swampland consistency favoring $\alpha\gtrsim \mathcal{O}(10^{-3})$. This case predicts matter-like reheating and a red-tilted gravitational-wave background that is unlikely to be detected soon. In contrast, natural Inflation with $n=4,5$ is compatible with CMB constraints for $\alpha\lesssim 7,8$ and $\beta\lesssim -1$, respectively, leading to stiff reheating and a blue-tilted gravitational-wave background potentially observable by LISA, Cosmic Explorer, Einstein Telescope, DECIGO, and BBO while satisfying BBN and $\Delta N_{\rm eff}$ bounds. Combining gravitational-wave probes with Swampland criteria may therefore help distinguish possible UV completions of inflation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper uses a field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term in K-inflation to shift T-models and natural inflation into the ACT-favored ns region, but that term is introduced without a first-principles derivation.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that a field-dependent G(φ) in a K-inflation setup supplies extra friction that moves the α-attractor T-model (n=2) and natural inflation (n=4,5) into the higher ns range preferred by ACT data. The authors also give a more careful reheating calculation that avoids power-law approximations, apply Swampland checks, and forecast distinct gravitational-wave backgrounds for the two cases. For the T-model they find matter-like reheating and a red-tilted spectrum unlikely to be seen soon; for natural inflation they find stiff reheating and a blue-tilted spectrum that could reach LISA, ET, or DECIGO while staying inside BBN and ΔNeff limits. Those concrete windows and the detector-specific predictions are the parts that could actually be used by others. The choice of G(φ) is the clear soft spot. Nothing in the abstract or the reported results derives its functional form from a UV completion, string embedding, or symmetry; it is selected to produce the needed shift in the slow-roll parameters. The quoted ranges (β ~ O(10), α ≲ 7–8, etc.) are obtained by fitting the modified observables to the same CMB data, so they carry the usual post-hoc character. If the full text contains an independent motivation or robustness test for G(φ), that would change the picture, but on the evidence given the reconciliation remains phenomenological. This is aimed at the inflation-model-building community that tracks ACT updates and Swampland constraints. A reader who wants explicit parameter windows and falsifiable GW forecasts will find something usable here. It is worth sending to referees because the technical steps are specific and the observational claims are checkable, even if the authors will need to justify the kinetic term more convincingly.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a K-inflation framework incorporating a field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) to reconcile α-attractor T-models (n=2) and natural inflation (n=4,5) with recent ACT data favoring a higher scalar spectral index ns. It reports that the additional friction from this term shifts the models into the observationally allowed regions for parameter ranges such as β∼O(10) and α≳O(10^{-3}) for the T-model, and α≲7,8 with β≲−1 for natural inflation. The analysis includes a refined computation of the reheating equation-of-state parameter w_re without standard power-law approximations, consistency checks with the Swampland Distance and de Sitter Conjectures, and predictions for the gravitational-wave background spectrum and its detectability.

Significance. If the specific functional form of G(φ) can be shown to arise from a UV-complete theory or symmetry principle, the work would offer a concrete mechanism to revive these otherwise disfavored inflationary potentials while generating distinct, testable signatures in reheating and primordial gravitational waves. The refined reheating calculation and explicit Swampland tests are positive features that go beyond standard slow-roll analyses.

major comments (2)

[Model definition section] Model definition section: the functional form chosen for the non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) is introduced without derivation from a symmetry, UV completion, or string embedding. This choice is load-bearing for the central claim, as the reported shifts in ns and the viable windows for α, β are achieved only for this specific G(φ); without independent motivation the reconciliation remains a phenomenological adjustment rather than a theoretically motivated extension.
[Parameter scan and results section] Parameter scan and results section: the quoted viable ranges (β∼O(10) for the T-model; α≲7,8 and β≲−1 for natural inflation) are obtained by fitting the modified slow-roll parameters directly to the same Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset. No independent external benchmark, analytic derivation, or cross-check against a different observable is provided to establish these windows as predictions rather than post-hoc fits.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract and introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a clearer statement of the explicit functional form adopted for G(φ) and the precise definition of the parameters α and β.
[Figures] Figure captions for the ns-r contours and GW spectra should explicitly state the reheating assumptions and the range of β values shown.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and revisions where they strengthen the manuscript without altering its core results.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Model definition section] the functional form chosen for the non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) is introduced without derivation from a symmetry, UV completion, or string embedding. This choice is load-bearing for the central claim, as the reported shifts in ns and the viable windows for α, β are achieved only for this specific G(φ); without independent motivation the reconciliation remains a phenomenological adjustment rather than a theoretically motivated extension.

Authors: We acknowledge that the specific form of G(φ) is introduced phenomenologically within the K-inflation framework to demonstrate the impact of field-dependent non-canonical kinetics on the inflationary observables. Such terms are standard in effective field theory treatments of inflation, where they arise as higher-order operators or from integrating out heavy degrees of freedom. While this work does not derive the exact functional form from a particular string embedding or UV completion, we have revised the model definition section to include a brief discussion of possible theoretical origins (e.g., from axion monodromy or supergravity corrections) and to explicitly state the phenomenological nature of the choice. The central claim remains that this mechanism shifts the models into the allowed region; a full UV derivation is left for future work. revision: partial
Referee: [Parameter scan and results section] the quoted viable ranges (β∼O(10) for the T-model; α≲7,8 and β≲−1 for natural inflation) are obtained by fitting the modified slow-roll parameters directly to the same Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 dataset. No independent external benchmark, analytic derivation, or cross-check against a different observable is provided to establish these windows as predictions rather than post-hoc fits.

Authors: The quoted ranges are the values of the model parameters (α, β) for which the modified slow-roll predictions satisfy the Planck-ACT-LB-BK18 constraints. This is the standard procedure for constraining inflationary models. The underlying potentials are independently motivated by theory, and the additional predictions of the framework—refined reheating dynamics, explicit Swampland consistency checks, and the distinct gravitational-wave spectra (red-tilted for the T-model, blue-tilted and potentially detectable for natural inflation)—serve as independent tests. We have revised the results section to emphasize these cross-checks and to clarify that the ranges represent observationally viable windows rather than a priori predictions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper proposes a specific functional form for the non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) to introduce additional friction and then computes the resulting slow-roll parameters, viable ranges for α and β, reheating equation of state, and gravitational-wave spectra that satisfy the ACT/Planck constraints. This constitutes standard parameter-space exploration and consistency checking rather than any self-definitional loop, fitted input renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation that reduces the central claim to its own inputs by construction. Swampland criteria are applied after the fact as external tests. No equations or derivations in the abstract reduce the reported viability windows to tautological fits.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of a suitable G(φ) that produces the required friction, on the validity of the Swampland Distance and de Sitter Conjectures as selection criteria, and on the accuracy of the refined reheating calculation. No independent evidence for the chosen G(φ) is supplied.

free parameters (2)

β
Field-dependent kinetic coupling strength; values ∼O(10) or ≲−1 are selected to place the models inside the ACT-allowed region.
α
Model-specific parameter (e.g., in T-model or natural inflation potential); ranges O(10^{-3}) or ≲7,8 are reported as viable after the kinetic modification.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Swampland Distance and de Sitter Conjectures hold and can be used to constrain inflationary models
Invoked to select viable α and β windows; no derivation or independent test is provided in the abstract.
standard math Standard single-field slow-roll perturbation theory remains valid after the non-canonical kinetic term is introduced
Underlying framework for computing ns and the GW spectrum.

invented entities (1)

field-dependent non-canonical kinetic term G(φ) no independent evidence
purpose: To supply additional friction that shifts the inflationary predictions into the ACT-favored region
Introduced ad hoc to reconcile the models; no independent evidence or UV derivation is given.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5595 in / 1910 out tokens · 33351 ms · 2026-05-09T16:04:46.045349+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 81 canonical work pages · 5 internal anchors

[1]

Equation of state during the reheating phase 7
[2]

Swampland

Bounds on number of inflationary efolds 8 C. Gravitational Wave Background 11 IV.α-Attractor T-Model 12 V. Natural Inflation 16 A. Quartic case (n= 4) 17 B. Quintic case (n= 5) 22 VI. Discussion and Conclusion 24 Acknowledgment 27 A. Validity of the Power-LawP t Approximation 27 B. Natural Inflation with Negative Cosine 29 References 30 2 I. INTRODUCTION ...

2018
[3]

Equation of state during the reheating phase The cosmological evolution during the reheating phase also depends on how the inflaton energy density is diluted by cosmic expansion. This evolution can be captured by the effective equation 7 of state parameter 1 wre, i.e.,ρ(a) =ρ i exp h −3 R lna lna i 3(1 +w re(a))dlna i which reduces toρ∝ a−3(1+wre) for a c...
[4]

g∗s(T0) g∗s(Tre) 1/3 πMPl r rAs 2 ! a0T0 kTre e−Nre # ,(17) = ln

Bounds on number of inflationary efolds Consider the cosmological evolution starting when the perturbation of comoving scalek=a kHk (witha k andH k being the scale factor and Hubble parameter at that time) exited the horizon during inflation. This mode left the horizonN k ≡ln(a end/ak) e-folds before inflation ends and reenters the horizon at the CMB scal...
[5]

wherek a k is the physical Hubble size when the modekreenters the horizon, andH 0 is the Hubble scale today. In this work, we consider a power-law tensor power spectrum Pt(f) =rA s(f /f∗)nt with the spectral indexn t obtained from the consistency relationn t ≃ −r/8, whoseris evaluated for a given model at the CMB scale. The frequency corresponding to CMB ...

2018
[6]

A. H. Guth,The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solution to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23(1981) 347

1981
[7]

A. D. Linde,A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems,Phys. Lett. B108(1982) 389

1982
[8]

A. A. Starobinsky,A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,Phys. Lett. B 91(1980) 99

1980
[9]

V. F. Mukhanov and G. V. Chibisov,Quantum Fluctuations and a Nonsingular Universe,JETP Lett.33(1981) 532

1981
[10]

S. W. Hawking,The Development of Irregularities in a Single Bubble Inflationary Universe,Phys. Lett. B115(1982) 295

1982
[11]

A. H. Guth and S. Y. Pi,Fluctuations in the New Inflationary Universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.49(1982) 1110. 30 [7]WMAPcollaboration,Nine-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Parameter Results,Astrophys. J. Suppl.208(2013) 19 [1212.5226]. [8]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. X. Constraints on inflation,Astron. Astroph...

work page Pith review arXiv 1982
[12]

Universality Class in Conformal Inflation

R. Kallosh and A. Linde,Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,JCAP07(2013) 002 [1306.5220]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[13]

Superconformal Inflationary $\alpha$-Attractors

R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,JHEP11(2013) 198 [1311.0472]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[14]

Parvizi, S

F. Parvizi, S. Heydari, M. Solbi and K. Karami,Loop quantum inflation with inverse volume corrections in light of ACT data,JHEAp52(2026) 100563 [2510.03882]

work page arXiv 2026
[15]

Heidarian, M

H. Heidarian, M. Solbi, S. Heydari and K. Karami,α-attractor inflation modified by GUP in light of ACT observations,Phys. Lett. B869(2025) 139833 [2506.10547]

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Kallosh, A

R. Kallosh, A. Linde and D. Roest,Atacama Cosmology Telescope, South Pole Telescope, and Chaotic Inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.135(2025) 161001 [2503.21030]

work page arXiv 2025
[17]

S. Aoki, H. Otsuka and R. Yanagita,Higgs-modular inflation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 043505 [2504.01622]

work page arXiv 2025
[18]

Dioguardi, A

C. Dioguardi, A. J. Iovino and A. Racioppi,Fractional attractors in light of the latest ACT observations,Phys. Lett. B868(2025) 139664 [2504.02809]

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

Independent connection in action during inflation,

A. Salvio,Independent connection in action during inflation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) L061301 [2504.10488]

work page arXiv 2025
[20]

Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Z. Yi and F. Zhang,Nonminimal coupling in light of ACT data,Phys. Dark Univ. 50(2025) 102106 [2504.15218]

work page arXiv 2025
[21]

Drees and Y

M. Drees and Y. Xu,Refined predictions for Starobinsky inflation and post-inflationary constraints in light of ACT,Phys. Lett. B867(2025) 139612 [2504.20757]

work page arXiv 2025
[22]

L. Liu, Z. Yi and Y. Gong,Reconciling Higgs Inflation with ACT Observations through Reheating, 2505.02407

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv
[23]

I. D. Gialamas, T. Katsoulas and K. Tamvakis,Keeping the relation between the Starobinsky model and no-scale supergravity ACTive,JCAP09(2025) 060 [2505.03608]. 31

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

Pallis,Updating GUT-Scale Pole Higgs Inflation After ACT DR6, Phys

C. Pallis,Updating GUT-scale pole Higgs inflation after ACT DR6,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 015033 [2510.02083]

work page arXiv 2026
[25]

Aldabergenov and S

Y. Aldabergenov and S. V. Ketov,Single-field D-type inflation in the minimal supergravity in light of Planck-ACT-SPT data,Eur. Phys. J. C86(2026) 91 [2512.08760]

work page arXiv 2026
[26]

Ahmed, S

W. Ahmed, S. O. Allehabi and M. U. Rehman,Revisiting polynomial hybrid inflation: Planck and ACT compatibility via radiative corrections,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 043532 [2508.01998]

work page arXiv 2026
[27]

Y. Zhu, Q. Gao, Y. Gong and Z. Yi,Inflationary models with Gauss–Bonnet coupling in light of ACT observations,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1227 [2508.09707]

work page arXiv 2025
[28]

Yuennan, P

J. Yuennan, P. Koad, F. Atamurotov and P. Channuie,Quantum-correctedϕ 4 inflation in light of ACT observations,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1307 [2508.17263]

work page arXiv 2025
[29]

D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol and S. I. Vilchinskii,ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs inflation,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023544

2025
[30]

Addazi, Y

A. Addazi, Y. Aldabergenov, D. Berkimbayev and Y. Cai,(Lovelock) 2 inflation: explaining the ACT data and equivalence to Higgs-Gauss-Bonnet inflation,2512.21167

work page arXiv
[31]

Kumar, G

N. Kumar, G. Otalora, R. Reyes, B. Espinoza, M. Gonzalez-Espinoza and E. N. Saridakis,Higgs-like inflation in scalar-torsionf(T, ϕ)gravity in light of ACT-SPT-DESI constraints,2512.24502

work page arXiv
[32]

Alexandre, L

J. Alexandre, L. Heurtier and S. Pla,Exact Renormalisation Group Evolution of the Inflation Dynamics: Reconcilingα-Attractors with ACT,2511.05296

work page arXiv
[33]

Armendariz-Picon, T

C. Armendariz-Picon, T. Damour and V. F. Mukhanov,k - inflation,Phys. Lett. B458(1999) 209 [hep-th/9904075]

work page arXiv 1999
[34]

Garriga and V

J. Garriga and V. F. Mukhanov,Perturbations in k-inflation,Phys. Lett. B458(1999) 219 [hep-th/9904176]

work page arXiv 1999
[35]

Barenboim and W

G. Barenboim and W. H. Kinney,Slow roll in simple non-canonical inflation,JCAP03(2007) 014 [astro-ph/0701343]

work page arXiv 2007
[36]

J. Lin, Q. Gao, Y. Gong, Y. Lu, C. Zhang and F. Zhang,Primordial black holes and secondary gravitational waves fromkandGinflation,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 103515 [2001.05909]

work page arXiv 2020
[37]

Solbi and K

M. Solbi and K. Karami,Primordial black holes and induced gravitational waves ink-inflation, JCAP08(2021) 056 [2102.05651]

work page arXiv 2021
[38]

Solbi and K

M. Solbi and K. Karami,Primordial black holes formation in the inflationary model with field-dependent kinetic term for quartic and natural potentials,Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 884 [2106.02863]

work page arXiv 2021
[39]

Freese and W

K. Freese and W. H. Kinney,Natural Inflation: Consistency with Cosmic Microwave Background Observations of Planck and BICEP2,JCAP03(2015) 044 [1403.5277]

work page arXiv 2015
[40]

Kitabayashi,Generalized hybrid natural inflation,Phys

T. Kitabayashi,Generalized hybrid natural inflation,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 043514 [2305.03905]

work page arXiv 2023
[41]

Zhang, Y.-B

N. Zhang, Y.-B. Wu, J.-W. Lu, C.-W. Sun, L.-J. Shou and H.-Z. Xu,Constraints on the generalized natural inflation after Planck 2018,Chin. Phys. C44(2020) 095107 [1807.03596]

work page arXiv 2018
[42]

Cosmological Constraints on Late-time Entropy Production

M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,Cosmological constraints on late time entropy production, 32 Phys. Rev. Lett.82(1999) 4168 [astro-ph/9811437]

work page Pith review arXiv 1999
[43]

MeV-scale Reheating Temperature and Thermalization of Neutrino Background

M. Kawasaki, K. Kohri and N. Sugiyama,MeV scale reheating temperature and thermalization of neutrino background,Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 023506 [astro-ph/0002127]

work page Pith review arXiv 2000
[44]

Hannestad, Phys

S. Hannestad,What is the lowest possible reheating temperature?,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 043506 [astro-ph/0403291]

work page arXiv 2004
[45]

P. F. de Salas, M. Lattanzi, G. Mangano, G. Miele, S. Pastor and O. Pisanti,Bounds on very low reheating scenarios after Planck,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 123534 [1511.00672]

work page Pith review arXiv 2015
[46]

Iacconi, S

L. Iacconi, S. Bhattacharya, M. Fasiello and D. Wands,Closing in onα-attractors,2511.14673

work page arXiv
[47]

L. A. Boyle and P. J. Steinhardt,Probing the early universe with inflationary gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 063504 [astro-ph/0512014]

work page arXiv 2008
[48]

Watanabe and E

Y. Watanabe and E. Komatsu,Improved Calculation of the Primordial Gravitational Wave Spectrum in the Standard Model,Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 123515 [astro-ph/0604176]

work page arXiv 2006
[49]

L. A. Boyle and A. Buonanno,Relating gravitational wave constraints from primordial nucleosynthesis, pulsar timing, laser interferometers, and the CMB: Implications for the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 043531 [0708.2279]

work page arXiv 2008
[50]

Jinno, T

R. Jinno, T. Moroi and K. Nakayama,Probing dark radiation with inflationary gravitational waves, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 123502 [1208.0184]

work page arXiv 2012
[51]

Saikawa and S

K. Saikawa and S. Shirai,Primordial gravitational waves, precisely: The role of thermodynamics in the Standard Model,JCAP05(2018) 035 [1803.01038]

work page arXiv 2018
[52]

D. G. Figueroa and E. H. Tanin,Ability of LIGO and LISA to probe the equation of state of the early Universe,JCAP08(2019) 011 [1905.11960]

work page arXiv 2019
[53]

Allahverdi et al., Open J

R. Allahverdi et al.,The First Three Seconds: a Review of Possible Expansion Histories of the Early Universe,Open J. Astrophys.4(2021) astro.2006.16182 [2006.16182]

work page arXiv 2021
[54]

Gouttenoire, G

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn,Kination cosmology from scalar fields and gravitational-wave signatures,2111.01150

work page arXiv
[55]

Gouttenoire, G

Y. Gouttenoire, G. Servant and P. Simakachorn,Revealing the Primordial Irreducible Inflationary Gravitational-Wave Background with a Spinning Peccei-Quinn Axion,2108.10328

work page arXiv
[56]

R. T. Co, D. Dunsky, N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, L. J. Hall, K. Harigaya et al.,Gravitational wave and CMB probes of axion kination,JHEP09(2022) 116 [2108.09299]

work page arXiv 2022
[57]

Simakachorn,Charting Cosmological History and New Particle Physics with Primordial Gravitational Waves, Ph.D

P. Simakachorn,Charting Cosmological History and New Particle Physics with Primordial Gravitational Waves, Ph.D. thesis, U. Hamburg (main), Hamburg U., 2022

2022
[58]

Duval, S

H. Duval, S. Kuroyanagi, A. Mariotti, A. Romero-Rodr´ ıguez and M. Sakellariadou,Investigating cosmic histories with a stiff era through gravitational waves,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 103503 [2405.10201]

work page arXiv 2024
[59]

Konings, M

A. Konings, M. Marinichenko, O. Mikulenko and S. P. Patil,Primordial Gravitational Wave Probes of Non-Standard Thermal Histories,2412.15144. [61]LIGO Scientific, VIRGO, KAGRAcollaboration,Cosmological and High Energy Physics 33 implications from gravitational-wave background searches in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA’s O1-O4a runs, 2510.26848. [62]LIGO Scientific, VIRG...

work page arXiv 2015
[60]

Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories

S. Hild et al.,Sensitivity Studies for Third-Generation Gravitational Wave Observatories,Class. Quant. Grav.28(2011) 094013 [1012.0908]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[61]

The Science of the Einstein Telescope

M. Punturo et al.,The Einstein Telescope: A third-generation gravitational wave observatory,Class. Quant. Grav.27(2010) 194002. [69]ETcollaboration,The Science of the Einstein Telescope,JCAP03(2026) 081 [2503.12263]. [70]LIGO Scientificcollaboration,Exploring the Sensitivity of Next Generation Gravitational Wave Detectors,Class. Quant. Grav.34(2017) 04400...

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[62]

G. M. Harry, P. Fritschel, D. A. Shaddock, W. Folkner and E. S. Phinney,Laser interferometry for the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 4887

2006
[63]

Crowder and N

J. Crowder and N. J. Cornish,Beyond LISA: Exploring future gravitational wave missions,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 083005 [gr-qc/0506015]

work page arXiv 2005
[64]

Detecting the Cosmic Gravitational Wave Background with the Big Bang Observer

V. Corbin and N. J. Cornish,Detecting the cosmic gravitational wave background with the big bang observer,Class. Quant. Grav.23(2006) 2435 [gr-qc/0512039]

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[65]

Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries

K. Yagi and N. Seto,Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044011 [1101.3940]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[66]

N. Seto, S. Kawamura and T. Nakamura,Possibility of direct measurement of the acceleration of the universe using 0.1-Hz band laser interferometer gravitational wave antenna in space,Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(2001) 221103 [astro-ph/0108011]

work page Pith review arXiv 2001
[67]

Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO,Class

S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna DECIGO,Class. Quant. Grav. 23(2006) S125

2006
[68]

The NANOGrav 15-year Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-Wave Background

S. Kawamura et al.,The Japanese space gravitational wave antenna: DECIGO,Class. Quant. Grav. 28(2011) 094011. [78]NANOGravcollaboration,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Evidence for a Gravitational-wave Background,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L8 [2306.16213]. [79]NANOGravcollaboration,The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Search for Signals from New Physics, Astrophys...

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
[69]

D. J. Reardon et al.,Search for an Isotropic Gravitational-wave Background with the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array,Astrophys. J. Lett.951(2023) L6 [2306.16215]. [82]SKAO Pulsar Science Working Groupcollaboration,The SKAO Pulsar Timing Array, 2512.16163

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2023
[70]

On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland

H. Ooguri and C. Vafa,On the Geometry of the String Landscape and the Swampland,Nucl. Phys. B 766(2007) 21 [hep-th/0605264]

work page Pith review arXiv 2007
[71]

The String Landscape and the Swampland

C. Vafa,The String landscape and the swampland,hep-th/0509212

work page Pith review arXiv
[72]

Das,Note on single-field inflation and the swampland criteria,Phys

S. Das,Note on single-field inflation and the swampland criteria,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083510 [1809.03962]

work page arXiv 2019
[73]

S. K. Garg and C. Krishnan,Bounds on Slow Roll and the de Sitter Swampland,JHEP11(2019) 075 [1807.05193]

work page arXiv 2019
[74]

Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland

H. Ooguri, E. Palti, G. Shiu and C. Vafa,Distance and de Sitter Conjectures on the Swampland, Phys. Lett. B788(2019) 180 [1810.05506]

work page Pith review arXiv 2019
[75]

Kehagias and A

A. Kehagias and A. Riotto,A note on Inflation and the Swampland,Fortsch. Phys.66(2018) 1800052 [1807.05445]

work page arXiv 2018
[76]

Kobayashi, M

T. Kobayashi, M. Yamaguchi and J. Yokoyama,G-inflation: Inflation driven by the Galileon field, Phys. Rev. Lett.105(2010) 231302 [1008.0603]

work page arXiv 2010
[77]

Kofman, A

L. Kofman, A. D. Linde and A. A. Starobinsky,Reheating after inflation,Phys. Rev. Lett.73(1994) 3195 [hep-th/9405187]

work page arXiv 1994
[78]

Mukaida and K

K. Mukaida and K. Nakayama,Dynamics of oscillating scalar field in thermal environment,JCAP 01(2013) 017 [1208.3399]

work page arXiv 2013
[79]

J. B. Munoz and M. Kamionkowski,Equation-of-State Parameter for Reheating,Phys. Rev. D91 (2015) 043521 [1412.0656]

work page arXiv 2015
[80]

Germ´ an, R

G. Germ´ an, R. G. Quaglia and A. M. M. Colorado,Model independent bounds for the number of e-folds during the evolution of the universe,JCAP03(2023) 004 [2212.03730]

work page arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.