arxiv: 2605.03025 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌀 gr-qc · astro-ph.GA· hep-th· math-ph· math.MP

Recognition: unknown

Can wormholes have vanishing Love numbers?

Shauvik Biswas

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc astro-ph.GAhep-thmath-phmath.MP

keywords wormholestidal Love numbersgravitational perturbationsR=0 spacetimetidal deformabilityaxial perturbationstraversable wormholes

0 comments

The pith

A wormhole in R=0 spacetime has a vanishing magnetic-type tidal Love number for the quadrupole mode under static axial perturbations when solved to linear order in the regularization parameter.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies tidal responses of a traversable wormhole geometry in R=0 spacetime as an alternative to black holes. It carries out approximate analytical calculations of the master equation that governs strictly static axial gravitational perturbations. The central result is that the magnetic-type Love number for multipole order ℓ=2 equals zero when the solution is retained only to linear order in the geometry's regularization parameter. This vanishing would imply that the wormhole deforms exactly like a non-spinning black hole under external tidal fields at this level of approximation, which matters for gravitational-wave observations that use Love numbers to test the nature of compact objects.

Core claim

In the R=0 wormhole spacetime, under a strictly static axial gravitational perturbation, the magnetic-type tidal Love number for ℓ=2 vanishes if the solution of the master equation is kept up to linear order in the regularisation parameter of the geometry.

What carries the argument

The master equation for static axial metric perturbations of the R=0 wormhole, solved analytically to linear order in the regularization parameter that smooths the geometry.

If this is right

The wormhole would be indistinguishable from a black hole by its tidal deformability in the linear approximation.
The vanishing holds only for magnetic-type perturbations and specifically for the ℓ=2 mode.
Retaining quadratic or higher terms in the regularization parameter could produce a nonzero Love number.
The result applies to the chosen traversable wormhole metric in R=0 spacetime.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Vanishing Love numbers may not be exclusive to black holes and could appear in other horizonless compact objects.
Full dynamical or nonlinear perturbations would be required to test whether the zero persists beyond the static linear case.
This opens the possibility that gravitational-wave data on tidal deformability cannot yet rule out such wormholes as black-hole alternatives.

Load-bearing premise

Truncating the master-equation solution at linear order in the regularization parameter captures the physically relevant tidal response of the wormhole.

What would settle it

An exact or higher-order numerical solution of the same master equation that yields a nonzero value for the ℓ=2 magnetic Love number.

read the original abstract

Wormholes are fascinating alternatives to black hole geometries. In this paper, we have studied a special case of wormhole solution in the context of $R=0$ spacetime. Our approximate analytical calculations show that under a strictly static axial gravitational perturbation of this spacetime, the magnetic-type tidal Love number (for $\ell=2$) vanishes if we keep the solution of the master equation up to linear order in the regularisation parameter of the geometry.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper reports a vanishing ℓ=2 magnetic Love number for one R=0 wormhole at linear order in the regularization parameter, but the truncation leaves the result fragile.

read the letter

The central result is that the magnetic-type Love number for ℓ=2 vanishes for this specific wormhole when the master equation is solved only to first order in the regularization parameter under static axial perturbations. The calculation follows the usual route: start from the given metric, derive the perturbation equation, solve asymptotically, and read off the ratio that defines the Love number. That part is standard and executed cleanly enough for an analytic approximation. The vanishing itself is new for this geometry and could matter for people checking whether wormholes can imitate black-hole tidal responses in gravitational-wave data. The setup is transparent and the algebra appears consistent at the stated order. The main limitation is the truncation. Love numbers are sensitive to the precise coefficients of the growing and decaying solutions at infinity, and the regularization parameter enters the background metric, so quadratic and higher corrections can shift those coefficients without being negligible far from the throat. The abstract gives no indication that the parameter is small in the traversable regime or that the linear solution preserves an exact cancellation. Without a second-order check, a numerical integration, or an error bound, it is hard to know whether the zero survives or is an artifact of stopping early. The wormhole is itself an approximate construction, which compounds the issue. This work is mainly for researchers already modeling wormhole spacetimes and their tidal signatures. A reader looking for robust, parameter-independent statements or full numerical relativity results will find little here. The derivation is clear enough that a serious referee could check the steps and ask for the missing higher-order terms or a stability argument. I would send it to review rather than desk-reject it.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies a special R=0 wormhole spacetime and reports that, for strictly static axial gravitational perturbations, the magnetic-type tidal Love number for ℓ=2 vanishes when the solution of the master equation is retained only up to linear order in the regularization parameter.

Significance. If the vanishing persists beyond the linear truncation, the result would provide an example of a wormhole geometry with zero Love numbers for a specific perturbation mode, offering a potential contrast to black-hole tidal responses that could be relevant for gravitational-wave tests of compact-object structure. The approximate analytic treatment supplies a concrete starting point, but its conditional nature limits immediate impact.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and perturbation analysis] The central claim that the ℓ=2 magnetic Love number vanishes rests entirely on the linear-order truncation of the master-equation solution in the regularization parameter. Love numbers are extracted from the ratio of the independent asymptotic solutions (growing versus decaying) at spatial infinity; quadratic and higher terms in the regularization parameter enter the metric coefficients that source the perturbation equation and can therefore modify the asymptotic coefficients even when small near the throat. The manuscript provides neither an explicit error estimate for the truncation nor a demonstration that the cancellation survives at higher orders.
[Master-equation solution] No check is performed against a numerical integration of the master equation or against an exact solution (if available) that would confirm whether the reported vanishing is an artifact of the linear truncation. Such a comparison is required to establish that the result is not an artifact of the approximation.

minor comments (2)

The abstract should explicitly state the range of validity assumed for the regularization parameter and note that the vanishing is conditional on the linear truncation.
Clarify the notation for the two independent asymptotic solutions used to extract the Love number and indicate how the ratio is formed after the linear truncation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of our manuscript and for providing detailed comments that help improve the presentation of our results. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and perturbation analysis] The central claim that the ℓ=2 magnetic Love number vanishes rests entirely on the linear-order truncation of the master-equation solution in the regularization parameter. Love numbers are extracted from the ratio of the independent asymptotic solutions (growing versus decaying) at spatial infinity; quadratic and higher terms in the regularization parameter enter the metric coefficients that source the perturbation equation and can therefore modify the asymptotic coefficients even when small near the throat. The manuscript provides neither an explicit error estimate for the truncation nor a demonstration that the cancellation survives at higher orders.

Authors: The manuscript explicitly states that the result holds to linear order in the regularization parameter, both in the abstract and in the body of the text. Since the background wormhole metric is itself constructed only up to linear order, the perturbation analysis is performed consistently at the same order. We will revise the manuscript to include an explicit error estimate, noting that quadratic corrections would enter at O(ε²) and are expected to be small for the regularization parameter values considered. This does not alter the leading-order vanishing we report, which serves as an indication that wormholes can exhibit vanishing Love numbers under the stated approximations. We will also clarify the extraction of Love numbers from the asymptotic behavior to ensure no ambiguity. revision: yes
Referee: [Master-equation solution] No check is performed against a numerical integration of the master equation or against an exact solution (if available) that would confirm whether the reported vanishing is an artifact of the linear truncation. Such a comparison is required to establish that the result is not an artifact of the approximation.

Authors: We agree that additional validation would strengthen the result. However, an exact solution for the master equation is not available because the underlying metric is an approximate construction. Numerical integration of the master equation at linear order in the regularization parameter should recover our analytic solution, as the analytic method is exact within the truncation. We will add a statement in the revised manuscript acknowledging this limitation and explaining why the analytic cancellation is reliable within the approximation scheme. If space permits, we may include a short numerical verification for specific parameter values. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Exact analytic solution of the master equation beyond the linear approximation in the regularization parameter is not available for this wormhole spacetime.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: vanishing Love number follows from perturbative solution on given background

full rationale

The paper solves the master equation for static axial perturbations on the R=0 wormhole metric and extracts the ℓ=2 magnetic Love number from the asymptotic ratio of growing/decaying solutions, reporting that it vanishes when the solution is truncated at linear order in the regularization parameter. This is a direct computational outcome of the differential equation on the specified background; the truncation is an explicit approximation choice rather than a redefinition or fit that forces the result by construction. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, no parameters are fitted to data and relabeled as predictions, and the derivation does not rename known results or smuggle ansatze via prior work. The claim is therefore self-contained against the paper's own equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim depends on the existence of an R=0 wormhole solution regularized by a small parameter and on the validity of linear-order perturbation theory around that background.

free parameters (1)

regularization parameter
Small parameter introduced to regularize the wormhole throat; the result is reported only to linear order in this parameter.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The background spacetime satisfies R=0 everywhere
This condition defines the special class of wormhole solutions under study.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5362 in / 1315 out tokens · 57463 ms · 2026-05-08T17:38:06.137611+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 56 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment

E. Bertiet al., “Black hole spectroscopy: from theory to experiment,”arXiv:2505.23895 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[2]

Tests of general relativity with future detectors,

E. Berti, “Tests of general relativity with future detectors,”Gen. Rel. Grav.56no. 12, (2024) 145

2024
[3]

The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment

C. M. Will, “The Confrontation between General Relativity and Experiment,”Living Rev. Rel.17(2014) 4,arXiv:1403.7377 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2014
[4]

Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations

E. Bertiet al., “Testing General Relativity with Present and Future Astrophysical Observations,”Class. Quant. Grav.32(2015) 243001,arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2015
[5]

Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

V. Cardoso and P. Pani, “Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report,”Living Rev. Rel.22 no. 1, (2019) 4,arXiv:1904.05363 [gr-qc]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[6]

Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers

T. Binnington and E. Poisson, “Relativistic theory of tidal Love numbers,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 084018, arXiv:0906.1366 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[7]

Aeh love, some problems of geodynamics, being an essay to which the adams’ prize in the university of cambridge was adjudged in 1911,

E. Wilson, “Aeh love, some problems of geodynamics, being an essay to which the adams’ prize in the university of cambridge was adjudged in 1911,”

1911
[8]

C. D. Murray and S. F. Dermott,Solar System Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, 2000

2000
[9]

Magnetic tidal love numbers clarified,

P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, T. Abdelsalhin, and X. Jim´ enez-Forteza, “Magnetic tidal love numbers clarified,”Phys. Rev. D98(Dec, 2018) 124023.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.124023

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.124023 2018
[10]

Testing strong-ﬁeld gravity with tidal Love numbers,

V. Cardoso, E. Franzin, A. Maselli, P. Pani, and G. Raposo, “Testing strong-field gravity with tidal Love numbers,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 8, (2017) 084014, arXiv:1701.01116 [gr-qc]. [Addendum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 089901 (2017)]

work page arXiv 2017
[11]

Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars

T. Hinderer, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars,” Astrophys. J.677(2008) 1216–1220,arXiv:0711.2420 [astro-ph]. [Erratum: Astrophys.J. 697, 964 (2009)]

work page Pith review arXiv 2008
[12]

Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,

H. S. Chia, “Tidal deformation and dissipation of rotating black holes,”Phys. Rev. D104no. 2, (2021) 024013,arXiv:2010.07300 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2021
[13]

Effective action and linear response of compact objects in Newtonian gravity

S. Chakrabarti, T. Delsate, and J. Steinhoff, “Effective action and linear response of compact objects in Newtonian gravity,”Phys. Rev. D88(2013) 084038, arXiv:1306.5820 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2013
[14]

An Effective Field Theory of Gravity for Extended Objects

W. D. Goldberger and I. Z. Rothstein, “An Effective field theory of gravity for extended objects,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104029,arXiv:hep-th/0409156

work page Pith review arXiv 2006
[15]

Poisson and C

E. Poisson and C. M. Will,Gravity: Newtonian, Post-Newtonian, Relativistic. Cambridge University Press, 2014

2014
[16]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502 , eid =

E. E. Flanagan and T. Hinderer, “Constraining neutron-star tidal love numbers with gravitational-wave detectors,”Phys. Rev. D77(Jan, 2008) 021502.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.77.021502

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.77.021502 2008
[17]

Effective action approach to higher-order relativistic tidal interactions in binary systems and their effective one body description

D. Bini, T. Damour, and G. Faye, “Effective action approach to higher-order relativistic tidal interactions in binary systems and their effective one body description,”Phys. Rev. D85(2012) 124034, arXiv:1202.3565 [gr-qc]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[18]

doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044022 , eid =

K. Chatziioannou, E. Poisson, and N. Yunes, “Tidal heating and torquing of a kerr black hole to next-to-leading order in the tidal coupling,”Phys. Rev. D87(Feb, 2013) 044022.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.87.044022

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.044022 2013
[19]

Absorption effects due to spin in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,

R. A. Porto, “Absorption effects due to spin in the worldline approach to black hole dynamics,”Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 064026,arXiv:0710.5150 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2008
[20]

Fermionic response of black holes in general relativity,

S. Chakraborty, P. Heidmann, and P. Pani, “Fermionic response of black holes in general relativity,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 6, (2026) L061503,arXiv:2508.20155 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2026
[21]

Dynamical tidal Love numbers of Kerr-like compact 7 objects,

S. Chakraborty, E. Maggio, M. Silvestrini, and P. Pani, “Dynamical tidal Love numbers of Kerr-like compact 7 objects,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 8, (2024) 084042, arXiv:2310.06023 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[22]

The Effective Field Theorist's Approach to Gravitational Dynamics

R. A. Porto, “The effective field theorist’s approach to gravitational dynamics,”Phys. Rept.633(2016) 1–104, arXiv:1601.04914 [hep-th]

work page Pith review arXiv 2016
[23]

The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime,

R. A. Porto, “The Tune of Love and the Nature(ness) of Spacetime,”Fortsch. Phys.64no. 10, (2016) 723–729, arXiv:1606.08895 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[24]

The Infrared - Ultraviolet Connection,

M. J. G. Veltman, “The Infrared - Ultraviolet Connection,”Acta Phys. Polon. B12(1981) 437

1981
[25]

Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817

S. De, D. Finstad, J. M. Lattimer, D. A. Brown, E. Berger, and C. M. Biwer, “Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 9, (2018) 091102, arXiv:1804.08583 [astro-ph.HE]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 259902 (2018)]. [28]LIGO Scientific, VirgoCollaboration, B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170817: Measu...

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[26]

I-Love-Q Relations: From Compact Stars to Black Holes,

K. Yagi and N. Yunes, “I-Love-Q Relations: From Compact Stars to Black Holes,”Class. Quant. Grav.33 no. 9, (2016) 095005,arXiv:1601.02171 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2016
[27]

Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars inf(R) gravity,

S. S. Yazadjiev, D. D. Doneva, and K. D. Kokkotas, “Tidal Love numbers of neutron stars inf(R) gravity,” Eur. Phys. J. C78no. 10, (2018) 818, arXiv:1803.09534 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[28]

Constraining extra-spatial dimensions with observations of GW170817,

K. Chakravarti, S. Chakraborty, K. S. Phukon, S. Bose, and S. SenGupta, “Constraining extra-spatial dimensions with observations of GW170817,”Class. Quant. Grav.37no. 10, (2020) 105004, arXiv:1903.10159 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[29]

Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes,

V. De Luca, J. Khoury, and S. S. C. Wong, “Implications of the weak gravity conjecture for tidal Love numbers of black holes,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 4, (2023) 044066,arXiv:2211.14325 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[30]

Dynamical Love numbers for area quantized black holes,

S. Nair, S. Chakraborty, and S. Sarkar, “Dynamical Love numbers for area quantized black holes,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 12, (2023) 124041,arXiv:2208.06235 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2023
[31]

Tidal Love Numbers of Braneworld Black Holes and Wormholes,

H. S. Tan, “Tidal Love Numbers of Braneworld Black Holes and Wormholes,”Phys. Rev. D102no. 4, (2020) 044061,arXiv:2001.00403 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Tidal deformation of black holes in Lovelock gravity,

C. Singha and S. Chakraborty, “Tidal deformation of black holes in Lovelock gravity,”arXiv:2508.14944 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv
[33]

Scalar Love numbers and Love symmetries of 5-dimensional Myers-Perry black holes,

P. Charalambous and M. M. Ivanov, “Scalar Love numbers and Love symmetries of 5-dimensional Myers-Perry black holes,”JHEP07(2023) 222, arXiv:2303.16036 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[34]

Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,

M. J. Rodriguez, L. Santoni, A. R. Solomon, and L. F. Temoche, “Love numbers for rotating black holes in higher dimensions,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 8, (2023) 084011,arXiv:2304.03743 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2023
[35]

Tidal Love numbers of static black holes in anti-de Sitter,

E. Franzin, A. M. Frassino, and J. V. Rocha, “Tidal Love numbers of static black holes in anti-de Sitter,” JHEP12(2025) 224,arXiv:2410.23545 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2025
[36]

Geometric polarization of plasmas and Love numbers of AdS black branes,

R. Emparan, A. Fernandez-Pique, and R. Luna, “Geometric polarization of plasmas and Love numbers of AdS black branes,”JHEP09(2017) 150, arXiv:1707.02777 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2017
[37]

Scalar tidal response of a rotating BTZ black hole,

R. P. Bhatt and C. Singha, “Scalar tidal response of a rotating BTZ black hole,”JHEP11(2024) 154, arXiv:2407.09470 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[38]

Tidal response of regular black holes,

C. Coviello, V. Vellucci, and L. Lehner, “Tidal response of regular black holes,”Phys. Rev. D111no. 10, (2025) 104073,arXiv:2503.04287 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[39]

Damour, M

T. Damour, M. Soffel, and C. Xu, “General-relativistic celestial mechanics ii. translational equations of motion,”Phys. Rev. D45(Feb, 1992) 1017–1044. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.45.1017

work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.45.1017 1992
[40]

Are neutron stars crushed? gravitomagnetic tidal fields as a mechanism for binary-induced collapse,

M. Favata, “Are neutron stars crushed? gravitomagnetic tidal fields as a mechanism for binary-induced collapse,”Phys. Rev. D73(2006) 104005,arXiv:astro-ph/0510668

work page arXiv 2006
[41]

Causality and multiply connected space-time,

R. W. Fuller and J. A. Wheeler, “Causality and multiply connected space-time,”Phys. Rev.128(Oct,
[42]

919–929.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.128.919

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.128.919
[43]

Echoes from braneworld wormholes,

S. Biswas, M. Rahman, and S. Chakraborty, “Echoes from braneworld wormholes,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 12, (2022) 124003,arXiv:2205.14743 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[44]

R = 0 space-times and selfdual Lorentzian wormholes,

N. Dadhich, S. Kar, S. Mukherji, and M. Visser, “R = 0 space-times and selfdual Lorentzian wormholes,”Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 064004,arXiv:gr-qc/0109069

work page arXiv 2002
[45]

Can extra dimensional effects allow wormholes without exotic matter?,

S. Kar, S. Lahiri, and S. SenGupta, “Can extra dimensional effects allow wormholes without exotic matter?,”Phys. Lett. B750(2015) 319–324, arXiv:1505.06831 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2015
[46]

Galactic wormholes: Geometry, stability, and echoes,

S. Biswas, C. Singha, and S. Chakraborty, “Galactic wormholes: Geometry, stability, and echoes,”Phys. Rev. D109no. 6, (2024) 064043,arXiv:2307.04836 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[47]

Lorentzian wormholes. from einstein to hawking,

M. Visser, “Lorentzian wormholes. from einstein to hawking,”Woodbury(1995)

1995
[48]

Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,

M. S. Morris and K. S. Thorne, “Wormholes in space-time and their use for interstellar travel: A tool for teaching general relativity,”Am. J. Phys.56(1988) 395–412

1988
[49]

Wormholes with nonexotic matter in Born-Infeld gravity,

R. Shaikh, “Wormholes with nonexotic matter in Born-Infeld gravity,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 6, (2018) 064033,arXiv:1807.07941 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[50]

Raychaudhuri, Phys

A. Raychaudhuri, “Relativistic cosmology. i,”Phys. Rev.98(May, 1955) 1123–1126.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.98.1123

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.98.1123 1955
[51]

Regge, J

T. Regge and J. A. Wheeler, “Stability of a schwarzschild singularity,”Phys. Rev.108(Nov, 1957) 1063–1069.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.108.1063

work page doi:10.1103/physrev.108.1063 1957
[52]

Equations governing the nonradial oscillations of a slowly rotating relativistic star,

Y. Kojima, “Equations governing the nonradial oscillations of a slowly rotating relativistic star,”Phys. Rev. D46(1992) 4289–4303

1992
[53]

Chakraborty, G

S. Chakraborty, G. Comp` ere, and L. Machet, “Tidal Love numbers and quasinormal modes of the Schwarzschild-Hernquist black hole,”Phys. Rev. D112 no. 2, (2025) 024015,arXiv:2412.14831 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2025
[54]

Here we have usedP ℓ to denoteP ℓ(cosθ)
[55]

In general, there can be terms proportional to∂ ϕYℓm, but due to spherical symmetry we takem= 0 for simplicity
[56]

Magnetic tidal Love numbers clarified,

P. Pani, L. Gualtieri, T. Abdelsalhin, and X. Jim´ enez-Forteza, “Magnetic tidal Love numbers clarified,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 12, (2018) 124023, arXiv:1810.01094 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2018
[57]

Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars

T. Damour and A. Nagar, “Relativistic tidal properties of neutron stars,”Phys. Rev. D80(2009) 084035, arXiv:0906.0096 [gr-qc]. 8

work page Pith review arXiv 2009
[58]

Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation

K. S. Thorne, “Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation,”Rev. Mod. Phys.52(Apr, 1980) 299–339. https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.299

work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.52.299 1980
[59]

Simpson and M

A. Simpson and M. Visser, “Black-bounce to traversable wormhole,”JCAP02(2019) 042, arXiv:1812.07114 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2019
[60]

Wormholes as black hole foils,

T. Damour and S. N. Solodukhin, “Wormholes as black hole foils,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 024016, arXiv:0704.2667 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2007
[61]

Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems,

L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Ladder symmetries of black holes. Implications for love numbers and no-hair theorems,” JCAP01no. 01, (2022) 032,arXiv:2105.01069 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[62]

Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes,

L. Hui, A. Joyce, R. Penco, L. Santoni, and A. R. Solomon, “Near-zone symmetries of Kerr black holes,” JHEP09(2022) 049,arXiv:2203.08832 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2022
[63]

Hidden symmetries, null geodesics, and photon capture in the Sen black hole,

K. Hioki and U. Miyamoto, “Hidden symmetries, null geodesics, and photon capture in the Sen black hole,” Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 044007,arXiv:0805.3146 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2008
[64]

Hidden symmetry of the static re- sponse of black holes: applications to Love numbers,

J. Ben Achour, E. R. Livine, S. Mukohyama, and J.-P. Uzan, “Hidden symmetry of the static response of black holes: applications to Love numbers,”JHEP07(2022) 112,arXiv:2202.12828 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2022
[65]

Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers,

P. Charalambous, S. Dubovsky, and M. M. Ivanov, “Hidden Symmetry of Vanishing Love Numbers,”Phys. Rev. Lett.127no. 10, (2021) 101101, arXiv:2103.01234 [hep-th]

work page arXiv 2021
[66]

Tidal Love numbers and Green’s functions in black hole spacetimes,

V. De Luca, A. Garoffolo, J. Khoury, and M. Trodden, “Tidal Love numbers and Green’s functions in black hole spacetimes,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 6, (2024) 064081,arXiv:2407.07156 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2024
[67]

A recipe for echoes from exotic compact objects,

Z. Mark, A. Zimmerman, S. M. Du, and Y. Chen, “A recipe for echoes from exotic compact objects,”Phys. Rev. D96no. 8, (2017) 084002,arXiv:1706.06155 [gr-qc]

work page arXiv 2017