pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03032 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🪐 quant-ph · cond-mat.dis-nn· cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.stat-mech· physics.atom-ph

Robust spin-squeezing on quantum networks: the lesson from universality

Andrea Solfanelli , Augusto Smerzi , Peter Zoller , Nicol\`o Defenu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 19:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.atom-ph
keywords spin squeezingquantum networksspectral dimensionXY universalitypercolationmetrological gainsymmetry breakingquantum sensors
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

Scalable spin squeezing on quantum networks is governed by the interaction graph's spectral dimension and whether the model is below the symmetry breaking transition.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper identifies the conditions for achieving scalable spin squeezing in spin ensembles on arbitrary network geometries. It distinguishes OAT-like squeezing, which depends only on universal graph properties like spectral dimension, from critical squeezing, which additionally requires the system to be below the symmetry breaking transition. These arise from the interplay between XY-ferromagnetic universality and percolation universality on inhomogeneous graphs. The framework applies to experimental quantum simulation platforms and provides conditions for robust metrological gain.

Core claim

We establish that OAT-like scalable squeezing is governed solely by the universal properties of the interaction graph and controlled by its spectral dimension. In critical squeezing the spectral dimension provides only the necessary condition for scalable metrological gain while the sufficient condition is that the model lies below the symmetry breaking transition. Thus in quantum networks the scaling of the spin-squeezing critical point arises from the interplay between xy-ferromagnetic universality and percolation universality.

What carries the argument

The spectral dimension of the interaction graph, which dictates the scaling of OAT-like squeezing together with the XY-ferromagnetic and percolation universality classes.

If this is right

  • Scalable metrological gain becomes possible on generic inhomogeneous structures when the necessary and sufficient conditions hold.
  • A unifying perspective emerges for designing scalable quantum sensors across diverse simulation platforms.
  • Sharp experimentally relevant conditions appear for achieving robust squeezing in several concrete network scenarios.
  • The critical squeezing point scaling is fixed by the combined action of two universality classes on networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Network designers could select graphs with suitable spectral dimensions to enable squeezing without additional parameter tuning.
  • The same universal conditions might apply to other quantum tasks such as entanglement generation on inhomogeneous structures.
  • Experiments could test the predictions by preparing spin ensembles on tunable networks like hierarchical or fractal graphs.
  • Any observed deviation from the expected scaling would signal the breakdown of the assumed universality classes.

Load-bearing premise

The interacting spin models belong to the XY-ferromagnetic universality class and percolation universality governs the critical-point scaling on arbitrary inhomogeneous graphs.

What would settle it

Measuring a squeezing scaling that fails to follow the spectral dimension on a network with independently known dimension, or finding scalable squeezing in a system above the symmetry breaking transition.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03032 by Andrea Solfanelli, Augusto Smerzi, Nicol\`o Defenu, Peter Zoller.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representations of the three classes of inhomogeneous systems considered in this work: ( view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Summary of the hierarchy of necessary and suffi view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic representation of the necessary conditions for scalable spin squeezing. The possibility of scalable metrolog view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the spin-wave spectra obtained by exact diagonalization of the real-space quadratic Hamiltonian ( view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Schematic comparison of the two spectral gaps: the graph Laplacian gap δλ (blue line), setting the energy scale of the unperturbed Hamiltonian at the Heisenberg point, and the anisotropy-induced gap δε∆(red line). The critical point is determined by the condition δλ = δε∆c . (b) Solid lines represents the perturbation energy scale δε∆ = s(1 − ∆)degG as a function of 1 − ∆ for different bond activation … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Results for spatially uncorrelated disorder: (a)-(b) Finite-size percolation phase diagram for a long-range diluted lattice (a) and a power-of-two (PW2) graph (b). Black crosses denote the numerically determined percolation threshold obtained from Eq. (43), while the black dashed line shows the analytical prediction in the in the large N limit (46) and (54). (c) Random walk recurrence probability averaged … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spin-squeezing phase diagram as a function of the view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Numerical study of squeezing on a lattice with power-law correlated bond probability: (a)-(b) Optimal spin squeezing parameter ξ 2 (left blue axis) and long time xy-magnetization mxy as a function of the bond activation probability C for different system sizes N = 256, 512, 1024 and different values of the anisotropy ∆ = 0 (a) and ∆ = 0.95 (b) in a lattice with long-range correlated disorder with the bond … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Spin-squeezing dynamics, expressed as −10 log10 ξ 2 , for a one-dimensional long-range diluted lattice. Solid lines show the rotor/spin-wave prediction Eq. (C15), averaged over 400 disorder realizations, for different system sizes N (color-coded curves). Panels correspond to different interaction exponents: (a) α = 1.2 (ds = 10 > 3), (b) α = 1.8 (2 < ds = 2.5 < 3), and (c) α = 2.8 (ds ≈ 1.11 < 2). The dilu… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We establish the conditions under which scalable spin squeezing can be achieved in interacting spin ensembles embedded in arbitrary, inhomogeneous network geometries. We identify two different forms of squeezing: OAT-like scalable squeezing is governed solely by the universal properties of the interaction graph and is controlled by its spectral dimension. In critical squeezing, on the other hand, the value of the spectral dimension only furnishes the necessary condition for scalable metrological gain, while the sufficient condition requires the model to lie below the symmetry breaking transition. Therefore, in quantum networks, the scaling of the spin-squeezing critical point emerges from a nontrivial interplay between xy-ferromagnetic universality and percolation universality. We apply this general theoretical framework to several experimental scenarios and discuss sharp and experimentally relevant conditions for achieving robust metrological gain on generic inhomogeneous structures, giving a unifying perspective for designing scalable quantum sensors across diverse quantum simulation platforms.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript establishes conditions for scalable spin squeezing in interacting spin ensembles on arbitrary inhomogeneous quantum networks. It distinguishes two regimes: OAT-like scalable squeezing governed solely by the universal properties of the interaction graph and controlled by its spectral dimension, versus critical squeezing where the spectral dimension provides only a necessary condition and the system must lie below the symmetry-breaking transition, with critical-point scaling emerging from the interplay of xy-ferromagnetic and percolation universality classes. The framework is applied to experimental scenarios to derive sharp conditions for robust metrological gain on generic structures.

Significance. If the universality assumptions hold, the result supplies a graph-theoretic organizing principle for metrological performance that unifies design across quantum simulation platforms, with explicit credit due for the parameter-free character of the spectral-dimension predictions and the falsifiable distinction between necessary and sufficient conditions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / §3] Abstract and the section deriving the OAT-like regime: the claim that scalable squeezing is governed solely by universal properties of the interaction graph (and thus by spectral dimension alone) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit verification that arbitrary inhomogeneous graphs (including those with hubs or non-self-similar structure) remain inside the xy-ferromagnetic universality class rather than acquiring non-universal corrections or long-range effective couplings.
  2. [§4] The paragraph on critical squeezing: the statement that percolation universality governs critical-point scaling on arbitrary graphs is presented as following from the interplay with xy-ferromagnetic universality, but no derivation, finite-size scaling analysis, or check against possible violations on inhomogeneous lattices is supplied, leaving the sufficient-condition claim unsupported.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that 'conditions are established' but contains no reference to the specific equations or theorems that constitute those conditions; a parenthetical pointer to the relevant result would improve readability.
  2. [Introduction] Notation: the spectral dimension is denoted d_s without an explicit definition on first use in the introduction; a one-sentence reminder of its definition via the density of states would aid readers outside the graph-theory community.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below, clarifying the scope of our universality arguments and indicating the revisions we have made to strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / §3] Abstract and the section deriving the OAT-like regime: the claim that scalable squeezing is governed solely by universal properties of the interaction graph (and thus by spectral dimension alone) is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit verification that arbitrary inhomogeneous graphs (including those with hubs or non-self-similar structure) remain inside the xy-ferromagnetic universality class rather than acquiring non-universal corrections or long-range effective couplings.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting this foundational point. The OAT-like regime derived in §3 is controlled exclusively by the spectral dimension of the interaction graph, which is a universal graph property defined via the low-energy eigenvalue scaling of the Laplacian (or return probability) and applies by construction to arbitrary inhomogeneous networks, including those with hubs or lacking self-similarity. This regime does not require the spin system to remain inside the xy-ferromagnetic universality class of the microscopic model; rather, it arises when the graph spectrum produces effectively long-range couplings that drive mean-field-like squeezing dynamics, independent of non-universal corrections. We have revised §3 with an explicit clarifying paragraph distinguishing graph universality from spin-model universality, added supporting references on spectral dimensions in complex networks, and included a brief analytic example for a scale-free graph with hubs in the supplementary material to illustrate the absence of such corrections. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] The paragraph on critical squeezing: the statement that percolation universality governs critical-point scaling on arbitrary graphs is presented as following from the interplay with xy-ferromagnetic universality, but no derivation, finite-size scaling analysis, or check against possible violations on inhomogeneous lattices is supplied, leaving the sufficient-condition claim unsupported.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the discussion of the critical regime in §4 is concise and benefits from further elaboration. The sufficient condition for scalable critical squeezing requires the system to lie below the xy-ferromagnetic transition, with the critical-point scaling emerging from the interplay in which percolation universality on the graph sets the connectivity threshold while the ferromagnetic class governs fluctuation scaling; the spectral dimension supplies only the necessary condition for the transition to exist. Although a exhaustive finite-size scaling study across all inhomogeneous graphs exceeds the present scope, the general argument follows from adapting hyperscaling relations to the graph's spectral dimension. We have revised §4 to include a short derivation sketch of this interplay, a discussion of how the sufficient condition remains robust even when percolation universality deviates on certain graphs (e.g., trees), and a note on the limits of the framework. This strengthens the claim without altering the manuscript's overall conclusions. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on external universality classes

full rationale

The paper derives conditions for OAT-like and critical spin squeezing from the universal properties of interaction graphs (spectral dimension, xy-ferromagnetic class, percolation universality) without reducing any prediction to a fitted parameter or self-defined input. No equations or steps in the provided abstract or framework equate the target metrological gain to the assumed universality classes by construction. The central claims are framed as consequences of established statistical-mechanics universality rather than tautological re-labeling or self-citation chains, rendering the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review prevents identification of specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; none are explicitly named in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1132 out tokens · 99134 ms · 2026-05-08T19:07:33.245949+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • Foundation.AlexanderDuality alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    OAT-like scalable squeezing is governed solely by the universal properties of the interaction graph and is controlled by its spectral dimension. In critical squeezing... the sufficient condition requires the model to lie below the symmetry breaking transition.

  • Cost.FunctionalEquation washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the paradigmatic spin-squeezing dynamics is governed by the one-axis-twisting (OAT) Hamiltonian H_oat = S_z^2/(2 N_oat)... xi^2_min ~ N^(-2/3)

  • Foundation.AlexanderDuality / DimensionForcing alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear
    ?
    unclear

    Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

    the spectral dimension for the XY model in long-range lattices relates to alpha through ds = 2d/(alpha - d) in the mean-field regime

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Universal Spin Squeezing Dynamical Phase Transitions across Lattice Geometries, Dimensions, and Microscopic Couplings

    quant-ph 2026-05 conditional novelty 6.0

    The dynamical squeezing phase transition in bilayer XXZ spin models is universal across lattice geometries and interlayer coupling rescalings, with a new sub-linear scaling for short-range interactions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

135 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Spatial disorder is introduced through random site dilution, where each site is occupied with equal probability f = 1 − p

    Diluted long-range lattices We start by considering systems in which spin degrees of freedom occupy the nodes of a regular lattice and inter- act via long-range couplings decaying as a power-law of the intersite distance rij: Ji,j ∝ rij −α. Spatial disorder is introduced through random site dilution, where each site is occupied with equal probability f = ...

  2. [2]

    Graph geometries Going beyond diluted lattice geometries, we now con- sider how spin-squeezing dynamics is affected by more complex interaction graphs whose dimensionality, topol- ogy, and metric structure are entirely distinct from the physical embedding of the atomic array. Such graph geometries can be experimentally realized in setups of cold atoms tra...

    2048

  3. [3]

    Accordingly the calculation proceeds similarly to the nearest-neighbor case, allowing the thermodynamic limit of Eq

    Weak long-range ( α > d ) As long as we are in the weak long-range regime α > d , the Kac scaling is finite in theN → ∞ limit. Accordingly the calculation proceeds similarly to the nearest-neighbor case, allowing the thermodynamic limit of Eq. (A3) to be taken safely, substituting the discrete momentum values kn with the continuous variable k ∈ [−π, π). L...

  4. [4]

    Indeed, as shown in Eq

    Strong long-range ( 0 < α < d ) The situation changes dramatically in the strong long- range regime α < d . Indeed, as shown in Eq. (A2), the Kac normalization factor Nα diverges at large N ensur- ing energy extensivity. Accordingly, the thermodynamic limit of Eq. (A3) must be carefully considered. To this aim, it is convenient to write Eq. (A3) explicitl...

  5. [5]

    Role of an exponential cutoff We analyze the effect of introducing an exponential cutoff in the interaction profile, replacing the pure power- law couplings with Jr ∼ r−αe−κr. (A22) The Fourier transform of the couplings then reads ˜Jk(α) = NX r=1 cos(kr)e−κr rα , (A23) and the spectral gap between the zero mode and the first Fourier mode k1 = 2π/N is δλ ...

  6. [6]

    Equation (B4) reduces to a binary sum of cosine func- tions

    The α = 0 case For α = 0, all nonzero couplings have equal strength. Equation (B4) reduces to a binary sum of cosine func- tions. The minimal gap is attained at momentum k = π, for which ˜J0 − ˜Jπ = log2(N)−1X n=0 [1 − cos(2nπ)] = 2, (B6) independently of system size. Thus, similarly to strongly long-range interacting lattices with α < d (see App. A 2), t...

  7. [7]

    The α > 0 case For α > 0, the sum in Eq. (B4) converges as N → ∞ and defines a classical Weierstrass function [99, 100], W (x) = ∞X n=0 λn cos(xbn), (B7) with parameters λ = 2−α, b = 2, (B8) satisfying 0 < λ < 1 and b > 1 + 3π/2. The Weierstrass function is continuous everywhere but nowhere differen- tiable, and exhibits a self-similar fractal structure. ...

  8. [8]

    (B15) Because α < 0, the dominant contributions now come from large distances n ∼ log2(N) rather than from short- range terms

    The α < 0 case For α < 0, extensivity requires the introduction of a normalization factor N α, leading to the rescaled spec- trum ˜Jk(α) = log2(N)−1X n=0 N α2−αn cos (k 2n) = log2(N)−1X n=0 2α[log2(N)−n] cos (2nk) . (B15) Because α < 0, the dominant contributions now come from large distances n ∼ log2(N) rather than from short- range terms. This becomes e...

  9. [9]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Advances in quantum metrology, Nat. Photon. 5, 222 (2011)

    2011

  10. [10]

    C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017). 26

    2017

  11. [11]

    Pezz` e, A

    L. Pezz` e, A. Smerzi, M. K. Oberthaler, R. Schmied, and P. Treutlein, Quantum metrology with nonclassical states of atomic ensembles, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 035005 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    Bouwmeester, J.-W

    D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Wein- furter, and A. Zeilinger, Observation of three-photon greenberger-horne-zeilinger entanglement, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999)

    1999

  13. [13]

    R. H. Dicke, Coherence in spontaneous radiation pro- cesses, Phys. Rev. 93, 99 (1954)

    1954

  14. [14]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, F. L. Moore, and D. J. Heinzen, Spin squeezing and reduced quantum noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A46, R6797 (1992)

    1992

  15. [15]

    Kitagawa and M

    M. Kitagawa and M. Ueda, Squeezed spin states, Phys. Rev. A 47, 5138 (1993)

    1993

  16. [16]

    J. Ma, X. Wang, C. Sun, and F. Nori, Quantum spin squeezing, Phys. Rep. 509, 89 (2011)

    2011

  17. [17]

    M. Kac, G. E. Uhlenbeck, and P. C. Hemmer, On the van der Waals Theory of the Vapor-Liquid Equilibrium. I. Discussion of a One-Dimensional Model, J. Math. Phys. 4, 216 (1963)

    1963

  18. [18]

    D. J. Wineland, J. J. Bollinger, W. M. Itano, and D. J. Heinzen, Squeezed atomic states and projection noise in spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. A 50, 67 (1994)

    1994

  19. [19]

    J. W. Britton, B. C. Sawyer, A. C. Keith, C.-C. J. Wang, J. K. Freericks, H. Uys, M. J. Biercuk, and J. J. Bollinger, Engineered two-dimensional ising inter- actions in a trapped-ion quantum simulator with hun- dreds of spins, Nature 484, 489 (2012)

    2012

  20. [20]

    Kiesenhofer, H

    D. Kiesenhofer, H. Hainzer, A. Zhdanov, P. C. Holz, M. Bock, T. Ollikainen, and C. F. Roos, Controlling two-dimensional coulomb crystals of more than 100 ions in a monolithic radio-frequency trap, PRX Quantum 4, 020317 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    S. Guo, Y. Wu, J. Ye, L. Zhang, W. Lian, R. Yao, Y. Wang, R. Yan, Y. Yi, Y. Xu, B. Li, Y. Hou, Y. Xu, W. Guo, C. Zhang, B. Qi, Z. Zhou, L. He, and L. Duan, A site-resolved two-dimensional quantum sim- ulator with hundreds of trapped ions, Nature 630, 613 (2024)

    2024

  22. [22]

    Franke, S

    J. Franke, S. R. Muleady, R. Kaubruegger, F. Kranzl, R. Blatt, A. M. Rey, M. K. Joshi, and C. F. Roos, Quantum-enhanced sensing on optical transi- tions through finite-range interactions, Nature 621, 740 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys. 16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    Gross and I

    C. Gross and I. Bloch, Quantum simulations with ultra- cold atoms in optical lattices, Science 357, 995 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Bornet, G

    G. Bornet, G. Emperauger, C. Chen, B. Ye, M. Block, M. Bintz, J. A. Boyd, D. Barredo, T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, T. Roscilde, T. Lahaye, N. Y. Yao, and A. Browaeys, Scalable spin squeezing in a dipolar ryd- berg atom array, Nature 621, 728 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    W. J. Eckner, N. Darkwah Oppong, A. Cao, A. W. Young, W. R. Milner, J. M. Robinson, J. Ye, and A. M. Kaufman, Realizing spin squeezing with rydberg inter- actions in an optical clock, Nature 621, 734 (2023)

    2023

  27. [27]

    J. A. Hines, S. V. Rajagopal, G. L. Moreau, M. D. Wahrman, N. A. Lewis, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Schleier- Smith, Spin squeezing by rydberg dressing in an array of atomic ensembles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 063401 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    S. A. Moses, J. P. Covey, M. T. Miecnikowski, B. Yan, B. Gadway, J. Ye, and D. S. Jin, Creation of a low- entropy quantum gas of polar molecules in an optical lattice, Science 350, 659 (2015)

    2015

  29. [29]

    C. M. Holland, Y. Lu, and L. W. Cheuk, On-demand entanglement of molecules in a reconfigurable optical tweezer array, Science 382, 1143 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Bilitewski, L

    T. Bilitewski, L. De Marco, J.-R. Li, K. Matsuda, W. G. Tobias, G. Valtolina, J. Ye, and A. M. Rey, Dynam- ical generation of spin squeezing in ultracold dipolar molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 113401 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    M. W. Doherty, N. B. Manson, P. Delaney, F. Jelezko, J. Wrachtrup, and L. C. Hollenberg, The nitrogen- vacancy colour centre in diamond, Phys. Rep. 528, 1 (2013)

    2013

  32. [32]

    R. Gong, G. He, X. Gao, P. Ju, Z. Liu, B. Ye, E. A. Hen- riksen, T. Li, and C. Zu, Coherent dynamics of strongly interacting electronic spin defects in hexagonal boron nitride, Nat. Commun. 14, 3299 (2023)

    2023

  33. [33]

    L. B. Hughes, S. A. Meynell, W. Wu, S. Parthasarathy, L. Chen, Z. Zhang, Z. Wang, E. J. Davis, K. Mukher- jee, N. Y. Yao, and A. C. B. Jayich, Strongly interact- ing, two-dimensional, dipolar spin ensembles in (111)- oriented diamond, Phys. Rev. X 15, 021035 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macr` ı, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, and A. Trombettoni, Long-range interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 95, 035002 (2023)

    2023

  35. [35]

    Chomaz, I

    L. Chomaz, I. Ferrier-Barbut, F. Ferlaino, B. Laburthe- Tolra, B. L. Lev, and T. Pfau, Dipolar physics: a re- view of experiments with magnetic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys. 86, 026401 (2022)

    2022

  36. [36]

    Entanglement and spin-squeezing without infinite-range interactions

    M. Foss-Feig, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, and C. W. Clark, Entanglement and spin-squeezing with- out infinite-range interactions (2016), arXiv:1612.07805 [cond-mat.quant-gas]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  37. [37]

    M. A. Perlin, C. Qu, and A. M. Rey, Spin squeezing with short-range spin-exchange interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 223401 (2020)

    2020

  38. [38]

    Comparin, F

    T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, and T. Roscilde, Ro- bust spin squeezing from the tower of states of u(1)- symmetric spin hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. A105, 022625 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Comparin, F

    T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, M. Robert-de Saint- Vincent, and T. Roscilde, Scalable spin squeezing from spontaneous breaking of a continuous symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 113201 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    Comparin, F

    T. Comparin, F. Mezzacapo, and T. Roscilde, Multi- partite entangled states in dipolar quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150503 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    Roscilde, T

    T. Roscilde, T. Comparin, and F. Mezzacapo, Entan- gling dynamics from effective rotor–spin-wave separa- tion in u(1)-symmetric quantum spin models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 160403 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Block, B

    M. Block, B. Ye, B. Roberts, S. Chern, W. Wu, Z. Wang, L. Pollet, E. J. Davis, B. I. Halperin, and N. Y. Yao, Scalable spin squeezing from finite-temperature easy- plane magnetism, Nat. Phys. 20, 1575 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Y. K. Lee, M. Block, H. Lin, V. Fedoseev, P. J. D. Crow- ley, N. Y. Yao, and W. Ketterle, Observation of spin squeezing with contact interactions in one- and three- dimensional easy-plane magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135, 023402 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    Douglas, V

    A. Douglas, V. Kaxiras, L. Su, M. Szurek, V. Singh, O. Markovi´ c, and M. Greiner, Spin squeezing with itin- 27 erant magnetic dipoles, Phys. Rev. X15, 041021 (2025)

    2025

  45. [45]

    W. Wu, E. J. Davis, L. B. Hughes, B. Ye, Z. Wang, D. Kufel, T. Ono, S. A. Meynell, M. Block, C. Liu, H. Yang, A. C. Bleszynski Jayich, and N. Y. Yao, Spin squeezing in an ensemble of nitrogen–vacancy centres in diamond, Nature 646, 74 (2025)

    2025

  46. [46]

    J. R. Maze, P. L. Stanwix, J. S. Hodges, S. Hong, J. M. Taylor, P. Cappellaro, L. Jiang, M. V. G. Dutt, E. To- gan, A. S. Zibrov, A. Yacoby, R. L. Walsworth, and M. D. Lukin, Nanoscale magnetic sensing with an in- dividual electronic spin in diamond, Nature 455, 644 (2008)

    2008

  47. [47]

    Schirhagl, K

    R. Schirhagl, K. Chang, M. Loretz, and C. L. Degen, Nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond: Nanoscale sen- sors for physics and biology, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 65, 83 (2014)

    2014

  48. [48]

    Rovny, S

    J. Rovny, S. Gopalakrishnan, A. C. B. Jayich, P. Maletinsky, E. Demler, and N. P. de Leon, Nanoscale diamond quantum sensors for many-body physics, Nat. Rev. Phys. 6, 753 (2024)

    2024

  49. [49]

    Aslam, H

    N. Aslam, H. Zhou, E. K. Urbach, M. J. Turner, R. L. Walsworth, M. D. Lukin, and H. Park, Quantum sen- sors for biomedical applications, Nat. Rev. Phys. 5, 157 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    Sanchez-Palencia and M

    L. Sanchez-Palencia and M. Lewenstein, Disordered quantum gases under control, Nat. Phys. 6, 87 (2010)

    2010

  51. [51]

    Lewenstein, A

    M. Lewenstein, A. Sanpera, V. Ahufinger, B. Damski, A. Sen(De), and U. Sen, Ultracold atomic gases in op- tical lattices: mimicking condensed matter physics and beyond, Adv. Phys. 56, 243 (2007)

    2007

  52. [52]

    J. J. Alonso and B. All´ es, Monte carlo study of the two- dimensional site-diluted dipolar ising model, Phys. Rev. B 82, 064425 (2010)

    2010

  53. [53]

    J. C. Andresen, H. G. Katzgraber, V. Oganesyan, and M. Schechter, Existence of a thermodynamic spin-glass phase in the zero-concentration limit of anisotropic dipolar systems, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041016 (2014)

    2014

  54. [54]

    M. P. Kwasigroch and N. R. Cooper, Synchronization transition in dipole-coupled two-level systems with po- sitional disorder, Phys. Rev. A 96, 053610 (2017)

    2017

  55. [55]

    Zhang and B

    C. Zhang and B. Capogrosso-Sansone, Quantum monte carlo study of the long-range site-diluted xxz model as realized by polar molecules, Phys. Rev. A 98, 013621 (2018)

    2018

  56. [56]

    C. M. S. Gannarelli, D. M. Silevitch, T. F. Rosenbaum, G. Aeppli, and A. J. Fisher, Contribution of spin pairs to the magnetic response in a dilute dipolar ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 86, 014420 (2012)

    2012

  57. [57]

    Periwal, E

    A. Periwal, E. S. Cooper, P. Kunkel, J. F. Wienand, E. J. Davis, and M. Schleier-Smith, Programmable in- teractions and emergent geometry in an array of atom clouds, Nature 600, 630 (2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Bentsen, T

    G. Bentsen, T. Hashizume, A. S. Buyskikh, E. J. Davis, A. J. Daley, S. S. Gubser, and M. Schleier-Smith, Tree- like interactions and fast scrambling with cold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 130601 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    Aharonov, A

    D. Aharonov, A. Kitaev, and J. Preskill, Fault-tolerant quantum computation with long-range correlated noise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 050504 (2006)

    2006

  60. [60]

    Xu, Long-range coupling affects entanglement dy- namics, Physics 15, 2 (2022)

    S. Xu, Long-range coupling affects entanglement dy- namics, Physics 15, 2 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    Sharma, X

    S. Sharma, X. Turkeshi, R. Fazio, and M. Dalmonte, Measurement-induced criticality in extended and long- range unitary circuits, SciPost Phys. Core5, 023 (2022)

    2022

  62. [62]

    Block, Y

    M. Block, Y. Bao, S. Choi, E. Altman, and N. Y. Yao, Measurement-induced transition in long-range interact- ing quantum circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 010604 (2022)

    2022

  63. [63]

    A. P. Mill´ an, G. Gori, F. Battiston, T. Enss, and N. De- fenu, Complex networks with tuneable spectral dimen- sion as a universality playground, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 023015 (2021)

    2021

  64. [64]

    Cassi, Phase transitions and random walks on graphs: A generalization of the mermin-wagner theo- rem to disordered lattices, fractals, and other discrete structures, Phys

    D. Cassi, Phase transitions and random walks on graphs: A generalization of the mermin-wagner theo- rem to disordered lattices, fractals, and other discrete structures, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3631 (1992)

    1992

  65. [65]

    Cassi, Local vs average behavior on inhomogeneous structures: Recurrence on the average and a further extension of mermin-wagner theorem on graphs, Phys

    D. Cassi, Local vs average behavior on inhomogeneous structures: Recurrence on the average and a further extension of mermin-wagner theorem on graphs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2941 (1996)

    1996

  66. [66]

    Bruno, Absence of spontaneous magnetic order at nonzero temperature in one- and two-dimensional heisenberg and XY systems with long-range interac- tions, Phys

    P. Bruno, Absence of spontaneous magnetic order at nonzero temperature in one- and two-dimensional heisenberg and XY systems with long-range interac- tions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 137203 (2001)

    2001

  67. [67]

    M. F. Maghrebi, Z.-X. Gong, and A. V. Gorshkov, Con- tinuous symmetry breaking in 1d long-range interacting quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 023001 (2017)

    2017

  68. [68]

    Giachetti, N

    G. Giachetti, N. Defenu, S. Ruffo, and A. Trom- bettoni, Berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless phase transitions with long-range couplings, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 156801 (2021)

    2021

  69. [69]

    Giachetti, A

    G. Giachetti, A. Trombettoni, S. Ruffo, and N. De- fenu, Berezinskii-kosterlitz-thouless transitions in classi- cal and quantum long-range systems, Phys. Rev. B106, 014106 (2022)

    2022

  70. [70]

    Botet, R

    R. Botet, R. Jullien, and P. Pfeuty, Size scaling for in- finitely coordinated systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 478 (1982)

    1982

  71. [71]

    Dusuel and J

    S. Dusuel and J. Vidal, Finite-size scaling exponents of the lipkin-meshkov-glick model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 237204 (2004)

    2004

  72. [72]

    Fiedler, Algebraic connectivity of graphs, Czechoslo- vak Mathematical Journal 23, 298 (1973)

    M. Fiedler, Algebraic connectivity of graphs, Czechoslo- vak Mathematical Journal 23, 298 (1973)

    1973

  73. [73]

    A. P. Mill´ an, R. Ghorbanchian, N. Defenu, F. Battis- ton, and G. Bianconi, Local topological moves deter- mine global diffusion properties of hyperbolic higher- order networks, Phys. Rev. E 104, 054302 (2021)

    2021

  74. [74]

    Chung, Spectral Graph Theory, CBMS Regional Con- ference Series No

    F. Chung, Spectral Graph Theory, CBMS Regional Con- ference Series No. Nr. 92 (Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences)

  75. [75]

    A. M. Childs and J. Goldstone, Spatial search by quan- tum walk, Phys. Rev. A 70, 022314 (2004)

    2004

  76. [76]

    Chakraborty, L

    S. Chakraborty, L. Novo, and J. Roland, Optimality of spatial search via continuous-time quantum walks, Phys. Rev. A 102, 032214 (2020)

    2020

  77. [77]

    E. C. King, M. Linnebacher, P. P. Orth, M. Rizzi, and G. Morigi, Optimal spatial searches with long-range tunneling, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043020 (2025)

    2025

  78. [78]

    Solfanelli and N

    A. Solfanelli and N. Defenu, Universality in long-range interacting systems: The effective dimension approach, Phys. Rev. E 110, 044121 (2024)

    2024

  79. [79]

    Burioni, D

    R. Burioni, D. Cassi, and A. Vezzani, Transience on the average and spontaneous symmetry breaking on graphs, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 32, 5539 (1999)

    1999

  80. [80]

    Burioni, D

    R. Burioni, D. Cassi, and A. Vezzani, Inverse mermin- wagner theorem for classical spin models on graphs, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1500–1502 (1999)

    1999

Showing first 80 references.