pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03084 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Recognition: unknown

Hyperlocal urban NO2 hotspot modeling driven by microscopic traffic data

Michael Weger , Thomas Trabert , Timo Houben , Alexander Sohr , Elmar Brockfeld , Oswald Knoth , Roland Schr\"odner , Jan Bumberger
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph
keywords NO2 modelingurban air qualitydynamic traffic emissionshyperlocal dispersionstreet canyonmesoscopic traffic modelLES urban modelhotspot prediction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dynamic traffic emissions derived from mesoscopic simulations improve hyperlocal NO2 hotspot predictions over static baselines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines whether replacing static traffic emissions with dynamic ones generated from online-calibrated traffic simulations can produce more accurate near-road nitrogen dioxide concentrations in urban settings. It runs otherwise identical high-resolution dispersion simulations for two one-week periods at traffic hotspots in Leipzig, one using conventional fixed emissions and the other using time-varying emissions taken directly from the traffic model's instantaneous states. The comparison against official hourly monitoring data shows the dynamic version matches observations more closely overall. This matters for exposure assessment because street-level NO2 varies rapidly with traffic flow, and static methods routinely under-represent peaks that drive health impacts.

Core claim

The authors replace static road-traffic emissions inside the SUMO domain with dynamic emission rates computed from the model's online-calibrated traffic states and feed these into the nested CAIRDIO LES dispersion model. Against hourly NO2 observations at two traffic-oriented sites, the coupled dynamic setup outperforms the static reference, with the largest gains at the street-canyon location and in the representation of concentration peaks.

What carries the argument

The coupling of an online-calibrated mesoscopic traffic model (SUMO) to an LES urban dispersion model (CAIRDIO) that substitutes dynamic, traffic-state-derived emissions for static profiles.

If this is right

  • Dynamic emissions capture rapid traffic fluctuations that static profiles miss, raising model skill precisely where concentration peaks matter for exposure.
  • The nested framework supports city-wide application at high resolution while delivering clearest gains inside street canyons.
  • Representation of temporal variability in emissions directly improves fidelity at official monitoring stations oriented toward traffic.
  • The approach adds value for any urban modeling task that requires realistic short-term concentration events rather than long-term averages.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Adoption could sharpen personal exposure estimates for residents living within a few hundred meters of busy roads, potentially guiding more targeted traffic or ventilation interventions.
  • The same coupling logic might be tested on other primary pollutants whose emission rates also track instantaneous traffic density and speed.
  • Extending the evaluation across full seasonal cycles would reveal whether the observed gains persist when background chemistry and meteorology vary more widely.

Load-bearing premise

The online-calibrated traffic model produces emission rates whose only systematic difference from the static baseline is the intended temporal variability, without introducing compensating biases from calibration or coupling choices.

What would settle it

Hourly NO2 observations at the same street-canyon and hotspot sites showing no improvement, or degradation, in mean error or peak capture when the dynamic-emission run is compared with the static run.

read the original abstract

Road-traffic NO2 hotspots are still often modelled with static emissions and generic temporal profiles, although near-road concentrations respond strongly to rapidly changing traffic conditions. Here, we test whether detector-informed dynamic traffic emissions improve hyperlocal NO2 modelling relative to a conventional static baseline. To this end, we couple an online-calibrated mesoscopic traffic model (SUMO) with the LES-based urban dispersion model CAIRDIO in a nested high-resolution framework for Leipzig, Germany. We compare two otherwise identical experiment setups: a static reference simulation and a coupled simulation in which road-traffic emissions within the SUMO domain are replaced by dynamic emissions derived from simulated traffic states. The framework is designed for city-wide high-resolution application, while the present evaluation focuses on two traffic-oriented hotspot settings during two one-week periods. Compared against hourly NO2 observations of official air quality monitoring, the coupled setup performs better overall, with the clearest improvement at the street-canyon hotspot and in the representation of concentration peaks. Dynamic traffic emissions therefore provide clear added value for hyperlocal NO2 prediction where hotspot realism and exposure-relevant peaks matter.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a nested high-resolution modeling framework that couples an online-calibrated mesoscopic traffic simulator (SUMO) with the LES-based urban dispersion model CAIRDIO to replace static road-traffic emissions with dynamic, detector-informed emissions for NO2 hotspot simulations in Leipzig. Two otherwise identical one-week experiments (static baseline vs. coupled dynamic) are evaluated against hourly NO2 observations from official monitoring stations at two traffic-oriented sites, with the claim that the dynamic setup yields better overall performance, clearest gains at the street-canyon hotspot, and improved capture of concentration peaks.

Significance. If the performance gains can be shown to arise solely from the added temporal variability in emissions (rather than from calibration-induced shifts in mean emission totals or fleet composition), the work supplies concrete evidence that high-frequency traffic dynamics add value for hyperlocal NO2 prediction where peak concentrations and street-canyon realism matter. The controlled comparison against independent monitoring data and the city-wide applicability of the framework are strengths that would support broader adoption in exposure and policy modeling.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §2] Abstract and §2 (experimental setup): the claim that the two runs are 'otherwise identical' except for temporal variability in emissions is load-bearing for attributing any improvement to dynamics. Because the dynamic emissions are generated from an online-calibrated SUMO model whose parameters are adjusted to match detector counts, the resulting speed, acceleration, and fleet distributions may systematically alter mean emission rates relative to the static inventory. The manuscript must report the domain-integrated or site-averaged total NO2 emissions (or emission factors) for both setups and confirm they are matched within a stated tolerance; otherwise the reported gains against monitoring data could be an artifact of mean bias rather than evidence for the value of high-frequency variability.
  2. [Results] Results section (evaluation against observations): the abstract states that the coupled setup 'performs better overall' with 'clearest improvement' at the street-canyon site and in peak representation, yet no quantitative error metrics (RMSE, bias, correlation, or peak-capture statistics) are supplied for the two periods and two locations. Without these numbers and without an explicit statement of exclusion criteria or sensitivity to the calibration window, the magnitude and robustness of the claimed improvement cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by including at least one key quantitative metric (e.g., RMSE reduction or peak bias) to support the qualitative claim of improvement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We are grateful to the referee for the thorough review and valuable suggestions. These comments highlight important aspects for strengthening the attribution of improvements to dynamic emissions and for providing quantitative support for the claims. We address the major comments point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §2] Abstract and §2 (experimental setup): the claim that the two runs are 'otherwise identical' except for temporal variability in emissions is load-bearing for attributing any improvement to dynamics. Because the dynamic emissions are generated from an online-calibrated SUMO model whose parameters are adjusted to match detector counts, the resulting speed, acceleration, and fleet distributions may systematically alter mean emission rates relative to the static inventory. The manuscript must report the domain-integrated or site-averaged total NO2 emissions (or emission factors) for both setups and confirm they are matched within a stated tolerance; otherwise the reported gains against monitoring data could be an artifact of mean bias rather than evidence for the value of high-frequency variability.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the online calibration of SUMO to detector counts could lead to differences in mean traffic states and thus emission totals compared to the static inventory. The manuscript describes the setups as otherwise identical in terms of the dispersion modeling framework, input meteorology, and simulation domain. To directly address this concern, we will include in the revised §2 a table or text reporting the domain-integrated total NO2 emissions for the static and dynamic setups over each one-week period. If they differ significantly, we will discuss the implications and potentially perform additional simulations with scaled emissions to isolate the variability effect. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section (evaluation against observations): the abstract states that the coupled setup 'performs better overall' with 'clearest improvement' at the street-canyon site and in peak representation, yet no quantitative error metrics (RMSE, bias, correlation, or peak-capture statistics) are supplied for the two periods and two locations. Without these numbers and without an explicit statement of exclusion criteria or sensitivity to the calibration window, the magnitude and robustness of the claimed improvement cannot be assessed.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the results section relies on visual comparison of time series and qualitative statements about better performance and peak representation. No explicit numerical error metrics were provided in the submitted version. We will revise the Results section to include quantitative metrics such as RMSE, bias, Pearson correlation, and statistics on peak capture (e.g., hit rate for concentrations above the 90th percentile) for both the static and coupled setups at the two sites. We will also add a sentence on the calibration window used and any sensitivity tests performed. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; empirical comparison against external observations is self-contained

full rationale

The paper evaluates two otherwise identical CAIRDIO dispersion simulations (static emissions vs. dynamic emissions from online-calibrated SUMO traffic states) directly against independent hourly NO2 measurements from official air-quality stations. The reported improvement in overall performance, hotspot fidelity, and peak capture is a straightforward empirical metric with no reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional equations, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain consists of standard model coupling and validation steps whose outputs are falsifiable against external data rather than constructed from the inputs by definition.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the validity of two established models and their coupling; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or unstated axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption SUMO can be online-calibrated with detector data to produce traffic states whose derived emissions differ from static profiles only in temporal variability.
    Invoked when emissions within the SUMO domain are replaced by dynamic values.
  • domain assumption CAIRDIO dispersion calculations respond linearly enough to emission changes that the isolated effect of dynamic traffic can be measured against observations.
    Required for the controlled comparison of the two otherwise identical setups.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5514 in / 1297 out tokens · 83934 ms · 2026-05-08T01:54:56.625769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/ exceedance-of-air-quality-standards [last accessed: 2026-03-30] (2024) 32

    European Environment Agency: Exceedance of air quality stan- dards in Europe. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/indicators/ exceedance-of-air-quality-standards [last accessed: 2026-03-30] (2024) 32

    2026

  2. [2]

    https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/ air-quality-status-report-2025/nitrogen-dioxide [last accessed: 2026-03-30] (2025)

    European Environment Agency: Nitrogen dioxide (NO 2), Air Quality Sta- tus Report 2025. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/ air-quality-status-report-2025/nitrogen-dioxide [last accessed: 2026-03-30] (2025)

    2025

  3. [3]

    https://doi.org/10.2909/d94edbd6-c426-4aae-85af-56c77d7257e7 (2025)

    Agency, E.E.: National emissions reported to the Convention on Long- range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP Convention), v1.0, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2909/d94edbd6-c426-4aae-85af-56c77d7257e7 (2025)

    work page doi:10.2909/d94edbd6-c426-4aae-85af-56c77d7257e7 2025

  4. [4]

    Atmosphere 16(3), 312 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030312

    P¨ ultz, J., Th¨ urkow, M., Banzhaf, S., Schaap, M.: Nitrogen dioxide source attri- bution for urban and regional background locations across Germany. Atmosphere 16(3), 312 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16030312

    work page doi:10.3390/atmos16030312 2025

  5. [5]

    European Respiratory Journal27, 1129–1138 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00143905

    Samoli, E., Aga, E., Touloumi, G., Nisiotis, K., Forsberg, B., Lefranc, A., Pekka- nen, J., Wojtyniak, B., Schindler, C., Niciu, E., Brunstein, R., Dodiˇ c Fikfak, M., Schwartz, J., Katsouyanni, K.: Short-term effects of nitrogen dioxide on mortal- ity: an analysis within the APHEA project. European Respiratory Journal27, 1129–1138 (2006) https://doi.org/...

    work page doi:10.1183/09031936.06.00143905 2006

  6. [6]

    Environmental Pollution341, 122971 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122971

    Chen, X., Qi, L., Li, S., Duan, X.: Long-term NO 2 exposure and mortality: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution341, 122971 (2024) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122971

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122971 2024

  7. [7]

    Environmental Science & Technology 44(14), 5334–5344 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1021/es100008x

    Karner, A.A., Eisinger, D.S., Niemeier, D.A.: Near-roadway air quality: Synthe- sizing the findings from real-world data. Environmental Science & Technology 44(14), 5334–5344 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1021/es100008x . PMID: 20560612

    work page doi:10.1021/es100008x 2010

  8. [8]

    Building and Environment197, 107825 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107825

    Voordeckers, D., Meysman, F.J.R., Billen, P., Tytgat, T., Van Acker, M.: The impact of street canyon morphology and traffic volume on NO 2 values in the street canyons of Antwerp. Building and Environment197, 107825 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107825

    work page doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.107825 2021

  9. [9]

    Atmospheric Environment37(2), 155–182 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00857-9

    Vardoulakis, S., Fisher, B.E.A., Pericleous, K., Gonzalez-Flesca, N.: Modelling air quality in street canyons: a review. Atmospheric Environment37(2), 155–182 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00857-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(02)00857-9 2003

  10. [10]

    org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100025

    Beckwith, M., Bates, E., Gillah, A., Carslaw, N.: NO2 hotspots: Are we measuring in the right places? Atmospheric Environment: X2, 100025 (2019) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100025

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100025 2019

  11. [11]

    Environmental Pollution214, 690–704 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.052

    Zhong, J., Cai, X.-M., Bloss, W.J.: Coupling dynamics and chemistry in the air pollution modelling of street canyons: A review. Environmental Pollution214, 690–704 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.052

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2016.04.052 2016

  12. [12]

    hotspots

    Dai, Y., Cai, X., Zhong, J., MacKenzie, A.R., Bloss, W.J.: Chemistry, street canyon geometry, and emissions effects on NO2 “hotspots” and regulatory “wiggle room”. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science5, 97 (2022) https://doi.org/10. 33 1038/s41612-022-00323-w

    2022

  13. [13]

    Atmospheric Environment97, 144–154 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.012

    Kim, K.H., Lee, S.-B., Woo, S., Bae, G.-N.: NO x profile around a signalized intersection of busy roadway. Atmospheric Environment97, 144–154 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.012 2014

  14. [14]

    Environment International203, 109758 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint

    He, S., Yuan, Y., Yang, L., Luo, L., Dong, H.: Diurnal variation mapping of urban NO2 concentrations at high spatial resolution using mobile phone signaling data. Environment International203, 109758 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint. 2025.109758

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envint 2025

  15. [15]

    Weber, M

    Rodriguez, D., Valari, M., Payan, S., Eymard, L.: On the spatial represen- tativeness of NO x and PM10 monitoring-sites in Paris, France. Atmospheric Environment: X1, 100010 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.aeaoa.2019.100010 2019

  16. [16]

    Science of the Total Enviroment819, 152062 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152062

    Santiago, J.L., Rivas, E., Gamarra, A.R., Vivanco, M.G., Buccolieri, R., Martilli, A., Lech´ on, Y., Mart´ ın, F.: Estimates of population exposure to atmospheric pollution and health-related externalities in a real city: The impact of spatial resolution on the accuracy of results. Science of the Total Enviroment819, 152062 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152062 2022

  17. [17]

    483–491 (2004)

    Vardoulakis, S., Fisher, B., Gonzalez-Flesca, N., Pericleous, K.: Estimates of uncertainty in urban air quality model predictions, pp. 483–491 (2004). https: //doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47813-7 49

    work page doi:10.1007/0-306-47813-7 2004

  18. [18]

    Geoscientific Model Development11, 611–629 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-611-2018

    Kim, Y., Wu, Y., Seigneur, C., Roustan, Y.: Multi-scale modeling of urban air pollution: development and applicationof a street-in-grid model (v1.0) by coupling MUNICH (v1.0) and Polair3D (v1.8.1). Geoscientific Model Development11, 611–629 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-611-2018

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-11-611-2018 2018

  19. [19]

    Environmental Modeling & Assessment20, 583–597 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9445-7

    Holnicki, P., Nahorski, Z.: Emission data uncertainty in urban air quality mod- eling—case study. Environmental Modeling & Assessment20, 583–597 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-015-9445-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s10666-015-9445-7 2015

  20. [20]

    Geoscientific Model Development16, 2193–2213 (2023) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023

    Criado, A., Armengol, J.M., Petetin, H., Rodriguez-Rey, D., Benavides, J., Gue- vara, M., P´ erez Garc´ ıa-Pando, C., Soret, A., Jorba, O.: Data fusion uncertainty- enabled methods to map street-scale hourly NO 2 in Barcelona: a case study with CALIOPE-Urban v1.0. Geoscientific Model Development16, 2193–2213 (2023) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-16-2193-2023 2023

  21. [21]

    Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14, 10963–10976 (2014) https://doi.org/0.5194/acp-14-10963-2014

    Kuenen, J.J.P., Visschedijk, A.J.H., Jozwicka, M., Gon, H.A.C.: TNO-MACC II emission inventory; a multi-year (2003–2009) consistent high-resolution European emission inventory for air quality modelling. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 14, 10963–10976 (2014) https://doi.org/0.5194/acp-14-10963-2014

    2003

  22. [22]

    Copernicus Atmo- sphere Monitoring Service

    van der Gon, H.D., Hendriks, C., Kuenen, J., Segers, A., Visschedijk, A.: 34 TNO report: Description of current temporal emission patterns and sensi- tivity of predicted AQ for temporal emission patterns. Copernicus Atmo- sphere Monitoring Service. https://atmosphere.copernicus.eu/sites/default/files/ 2019-07/MACC TNO del 1 3 v2.pdf [last accessed: 2026-1...

    2019

  23. [23]

    Earth System Science Data , year =

    Guevara, M., Jorba, O., Tena, C., Gon, H., Kuenen, J., Elguindi, N., Darras, S., Granier, C., P´ erez Garc´ ıa-Pando, C.: Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service TEMPOral profiles (CAMS-TEMPO): global and European emission temporal profile maps for atmospheric chemistry modelling. Earth System Science Data 13, 367–404 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-...

    work page doi:10.5194/essd-13-367-2021 2021

  24. [24]

    Atmo- spheric Chemistry and Physics18, 8203–8225 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-18-8203-2018

    Kuik, F., Kerschbaumer, A., Lauer, A., Lupascu, A., Schneidemesser, E., But- ler, T.M.: Top–down quantification of NO x emissions from traffic in an urban area using a high-resolution regional atmospheric chemistry model. Atmo- spheric Chemistry and Physics18, 8203–8225 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/ acp-18-8203-2018

    2018

  25. [25]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques14, 5241–5269 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021

    Kumar, V., Remmers, J., Beirle, S., Fallmann, J., Kerkweg, A., Lelieveld, J., Mertens, M., Pozzer, A., Steil, B., Barra, M., Tost, H., Wagner, T.: Evaluation of the coupled high-resolution atmospheric chemistry model system MECO(n) using in situ and MAX-DOAS NO x measurements. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques14, 5241–5269 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/...

    work page doi:10.5194/amt-14-5241-2021 2021

  26. [26]

    Geoscientific Model Development16, 479–508 (2023) https://doi.org/10

    Poraicu, C., M¨ uller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., Fonteyn, D., Tack, F., Deutsch, F., Laffineur, Q., Van Malderen, R., Veldeman, N.: Cross-evaluating WRF-Chem v4.1.2, TROPOMI, APEX, and in situ NO 2 measurements over Antwerp, Bel- gium. Geoscientific Model Development16, 479–508 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 5194/gmd-16-479-2023

    2023

  27. [27]

    Environment International196, 109265 (2025) https://doi

    Zhong, J., Li, Y., Bloss, W.J., Harrison, R.M.: Street-scale black carbon modelling over the West Midlands, United Kingdom: Sensitivity test of traffic emission factor adjustments. Environment International196, 109265 (2025) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.envint.2025.109265

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envint.2025.109265 2025

  28. [28]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques11, 6719– 6734 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6719-2018

    Zhu, Y., Chan, K.L., Lam, Y.F., Horbanski, M., P¨ ohler, D., Boll, J., Lipkowitsch, I., Ye, S., Wenig, M.: Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns of on-road NO x concentrations in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques11, 6719– 6734 (2018) https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6719-2018

    work page doi:10.5194/amt-11-6719-2018 2018

  29. [29]

    A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation

    Gipps, P.G.: A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Trans- portation Research Part B: Methodological15(2), 105–111 (1981) https://doi. org/10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0191-2615(81)90037-0 1981

  30. [30]

    doi: 10.1103/physreve.62.1805

    Treiber, M., Hennecke, A., Helbing, D.: Congested traffic states in empirical obser- vations and microscopic simulations. Physical Review E62, 1805–1824 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.62.1805 35

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.62.1805 2000

  31. [31]

    doi:10.5334/baw , editor =

    Horni, A., Nagel, K., Axhausen, K. (eds.): Multi-Agent Transport Simulation MATSim, p. 618. Ubiquity Press, ??? (2016). https://doi.org/10.5334/baw

    work page doi:10.5334/baw 2016

  32. [32]

    In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp

    Lopez, P.A., Behrisch, M., Bieker-Walz, L., Erdmann, J., Fl¨ otter¨ od, Y.P., Hilbrich, R., L¨ ucken, L., Rummel, J., Wagner, P., Wiessner, E.: Microscopic traf- fic simulation using SUMO. In: 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 2575–2582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ ITSC.2018.8569938

    work page arXiv 2018

  33. [33]

    Transportation Research Procedia84, 495–503 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.03

    Algherbal, E.A., Ratrout, N.T.: A comparative analysis of currently used micro- scopic, macroscopic, and mesoscopic traffic simulation software. Transportation Research Procedia84, 495–503 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2025.03. 101

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2025.03 2025

  34. [34]

    SUMO Conference Proceedings 4, 165–178 (2023) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v4i.225

    Soni, S., Weronek, K.: Analysis and modelling of road traffic using SUMO to optimize the arrival time of emergency vehicles. SUMO Conference Proceedings 4, 165–178 (2023) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v4i.225

    work page doi:10.52825/scp.v4i.225 2023

  35. [35]

    SUMO Conference Proceedings5, 113–125 (2024) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v5i.1105

    Schaffland, A., Nelson, J., Sch¨ oning, J.: Simulating traffic networks: driving SUMO towards digital twins. SUMO Conference Proceedings5, 113–125 (2024) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v5i.1105

    work page doi:10.52825/scp.v5i.1105 2024

  36. [36]

    Energies 16(9) (2023) https://doi.org/0.3390/en16093941

    Madziel, M.: Vehicle emission models and traffic simulators: A review. Energies 16(9) (2023) https://doi.org/0.3390/en16093941

    2023

  37. [37]

    Inter- national Journal of Sustainable Transportation19(5), 431–445 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2025.2502558

    Jang, S., Park, J., Yu, G., Hwang, J.: Tools for estimating traffic emissions considering spatial scales and mitigation strategies: A systematic review. Inter- national Journal of Sustainable Transportation19(5), 431–445 (2025) https: //doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2025.2502558

    work page doi:10.1080/15568318.2025.2502558 2025

  38. [38]

    https://www.hbefa.net

    INFRAS, DLR, IFEU: Handbook Emission Factors for Road Transport (HBEFA) Version 4.2. https://www.hbefa.net. [last accessed: 2026-02-28] (2022)

    2026

  39. [39]

    Journal of Advanced Transportation2020(1), 4038305 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4038305

    Kim, J., Kim, J.H., Lee, G., Shin, H.-j., Park, J.H.: Microscopic traffic simulation calibration level for reliable estimation of vehicle emissions. Journal of Advanced Transportation2020(1), 4038305 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4038305

    work page doi:10.1155/2020/4038305 2020

  40. [40]

    SUMO Conference Proceedings4, 153 (2023) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v4i.223

    Keler, A., Kunz, A., Amini, S., Bogenberger, K.: Calibration of a microscopic traffic simulation in an urban scenario using loop detector data: A case study within the digital twin Munich. SUMO Conference Proceedings4, 153 (2023) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v4i.223

    work page doi:10.52825/scp.v4i.223 2023

  41. [41]

    Environmental Pollution208, 271–283 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.039

    Lateb, M., Meroney, R.N., Yataghene, M., Fellouah, H., Saleh, F., Boufadel, M.C.: On the use of numerical modelling for near-field pollutant dispersion in urban environments - a review. Environmental Pollution208, 271–283 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.039 . Special Issue: Urban Health and Wellbeing 36

    work page doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.039 2016

  42. [42]

    Geoscientific Model Development14, 1469–1492 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1469-2021

    Weger, M., Knoth, O., Heinold, B.: An urban large-eddy-simulation-based dis- persion model for marginal grid resolutions: CAIRDIO v1.0. Geoscientific Model Development14, 1469–1492 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1469-2021

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-14-1469-2021 2021

  43. [43]

    Geoscientific Model Development15(8), 3315–3345 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3315-2022

    Weger, M., Baars, H., Gebauer, H., Merkel, M., Wiedensohler, A., Heinold, B.: On the application and grid-size sensitivity of the urban dispersion model CAIRDIO v2.0 under real city weather conditions. Geoscientific Model Development15(8), 3315–3345 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-3315-2022

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-15-3315-2022 2022

  44. [44]

    Geo- scientific Model Development13(3), 1335–1372 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-13-1335-2020

    Maronga, B., Banzhaf, S., Burmeister, C., Esch, T., Forkel, R., Fr¨ ohlich, D., Fuka, V., Gehrke, K.F., Geletiˇ c, J., Giersch, S., Gronemeier, T., Groß, G., Heldens, W., Hellsten, A., Hoffmann, F., Inagaki, A., Kadasch, E., Kanani-S¨ uhring, F., Ketelsen, K., Khan, B.A., Knigge, C., Knoop, H., Krˇ c, P., Kurppa, M., Maa- mari, H., Matzarakis, A., Mauder,...

    2020

  45. [45]

    Geosci- entific Model Development14(2), 1171–1193 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-14-1171-2021

    Khan, B., Banzhaf, S., Chan, E.C., Forkel, R., Kanani-S¨ uhring, F., Ketelsen, K., Kurppa, M., Maronga, B., Mauder, M., Raasch, S., Russo, E., Schaap, M., S¨ uhring, M.: Development of an atmospheric chemistry model coupled to the PALM model system 6.0: implementation and first applications. Geosci- entific Model Development14(2), 1171–1193 (2021) https:/...

    2021

  46. [46]

    Geoscientific Model Development14(8), 4797–4842 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-4797-2021

    Resler, J., Eben, K., Geletiˇ c, J., Krˇ c, P., Roseck´ y, M., S¨ uhring, M., Belda, M., Fuka, V., Halenka, T., Husz´ ar, P., Karlick´ y, J., Beneˇ sov´ a, N.,ˇDoubalov´ a, J., Honz´ akov´ a, K., Keder, J., N´ apravn´ ıkov´ a, v., Vlˇ cek, O.: Validation of the PALM model system 6.0 in a real urban environment: a case study in Dejvice, Prague, the Czech R...

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-14-4797-2021 2021

  47. [47]

    Atmosphere15(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10

    Samad, A., Caballero Arci´ enega, N.A., Alabdallah, T., Vogt, U.: Application of the urban climate model PALM-4U to investigate the effects of the diesel traffic ban on air quality in Stuttgart. Atmosphere15(1) (2024) https://doi.org/10. 3390/atmos15010111

    2024

  48. [48]

    Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives31, 101413 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101413

    Essamlali, I., Nhaila, H., Khaili, M.E.: Impact of urban block shape on traffic and air quality: A SUMO-based comparative study of rectangular, radial, and trian- gular forms. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives31, 101413 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2025.101413

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trip.2025.101413 2025

  49. [49]

    Atmosphere16, 1–25 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020128 37

    Laudan, J., Banzhaf, S., Khan, B., Nagel, K.: Air quality-driven traffic manage- ment using high-resolution urban climate modeling coupled with a large traffic simulation. Atmosphere16, 1–25 (2025) https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos16020128 37

    work page doi:10.3390/atmos16020128 2025

  50. [50]

    SN Computer Science 3, 2661–8907 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01105-0

    Ilarri, S., Trillo-Lado, R., Marrod´ an, L.: Traffic and pollution modelling for air quality awareness: an experience in the city of Zaragoza. SN Computer Science 3, 2661–8907 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-022-01105-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s42979-022-01105-0 2022

  51. [51]

    Science of The Total Environment752, 141992 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141992

    San Jos´ e, R., P´ erez, J.L., Gonzalez-Barras, R.M.: Assessment of mesoscale and microscale simulations of a NO 2 episode supported by traffic modelling at microscopic level. Science of The Total Environment752, 141992 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141992

    work page doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141992 2021

  52. [52]

    Transportation Research Procedia22, 440–449 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.040

    Tsanakas, N., Ekstr¨ om, J., Olstam, J.: Reduction of errors when estimating emis- sions based on static traffic model outputs. Transportation Research Procedia22, 440–449 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.040

    work page doi:10.1016/j.trpro.2017.03.040 2017

  53. [53]

    implications for continuous selective moni- toring of gaseous air pollutants

    Fontijn, A., Sabadell, A.J., Ronco, R.J.: Homogeneous chemiluminescent mea- surement of nitric oxide with ozone. implications for continuous selective moni- toring of gaseous air pollutants. Analytical Chemistry42, 575–579 (1970) https: //doi.org/10.1021/AC60288A034

    work page doi:10.1021/ac60288a034 1970

  54. [54]

    SUMO Conference Proceedings2, 1–11 (2022) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v2i.88

    Fl¨ otter¨ od, Y.-P., Behrisch, M.: Online calibration with SUMO for network-wide traffic and emission monitoring – case study ITS Huainan. SUMO Conference Proceedings2, 1–11 (2022) https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v2i.88

    work page doi:10.52825/scp.v2i.88 2022

  55. [55]

    Rakow, C., Rybczak, G., Meinhardt, S.: MATSim Open Leipzig Scenario. GitHub. https://github.com/matsim-scenarios/matsim-leipzig [last accessed: 2026-03-15] (2023)

    2026

  56. [56]

    https://sumo

    German Aerospace Center (DLR): SUMO - Mesoscopic Simulation. https://sumo. dlr.de/docs/Simulation/Meso.html. [last accessed: 2026-03-20] (2026)

    2026

  57. [57]

    Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨ at der Universit¨ at zu K¨ oln

    Eissfeldt, N.G.: Vehicle-based modelling of traffic [dissertation]. Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakult¨ at der Universit¨ at zu K¨ oln. https://kups.ub. uni-koeln.de/1274/ [last accessed: 2026-03-20] (2004)

    2026

  58. [58]

    rep., World Meteorological Organization, 56 pp

    Z¨ angl, G., Reinert, D., R´ ıpodas, P., Baldauf, M.: The ICON (ICOsahedral Non-hydrostatic) modelling framework of DWD and MPI-M: Description of the non-hydrostatic dynamical core. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society141, 563–579 (2015) https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2378

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.2378 2015

  59. [59]

    Geo- scientific Model Development15, 7153–7176 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-15-7153-2022

    Z¨ angl, G., Reinert, D., Prill, F.: Grid refinement in ICON v2.6.4. Geo- scientific Model Development15, 7153–7176 (2022) https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-15-7153-2022

    2022

  60. [60]

    Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) Atmosphere Data Store (2020)

    Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (2020): CAMS European air quality forecasts. Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) Atmosphere Data Store (2020). https://doi.org/10.24381/a4005cee

    work page doi:10.24381/a4005cee 2020

  61. [61]

    Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany (2025)

    Prill, F., Reinert, D., Rieger, D., Z¨ angl, G.: ICON Tutorial 2025: Working with 38 the ICON Model. Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach, Germany (2025). https: //doi.org/10.5676/DWD pub/nwv/icon tutorial2025

    work page doi:10.5676/dwd 2025

  62. [62]

    Proceedings of the 11th International Clean Air and Environment Conference, Brisbane, 1992, Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand3, 451–462 (1992)

    Azzi, M., Johnson, G., Cope, M.: An introduction to the Generic Reaction Set photochemical smog mechanism. Proceedings of the 11th International Clean Air and Environment Conference, Brisbane, 1992, Clean Air Society of Australia and New Zealand3, 451–462 (1992)

    1992

  63. [63]

    Atmospheric emission inventory guidebook, 3 rd edition, September update

  64. [64]

    https://www.eea

    European Environment Agency, Copenhagen, Denmark. https://www.eea. europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/emepcorinair4/AEIG Section A.pdf/@@ download/file [last accessed: 2026-03-17] (2023)

    2026

  65. [65]

    Geoscientific Model Development 13, 23–40 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-23-2020

    Wu, L., Chang, M., Wang, X., Hang, J., Zhang, J., Wu, L., Shao, M.: Development of the Real-time On-road Emission (ROE v1.0) model for street-scale air quality modeling based on dynamic traffic big data. Geoscientific Model Development 13, 23–40 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-23-2020

    work page doi:10.5194/gmd-13-23-2020 2020

  66. [66]

    Geoscientific Model Development18, 9967–9990 (2025) https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-18-9967-2025

    K¨ uhbacher, D., Chen, J., Aigner, P., Ilic, M., Super, I., Gon, H.: Drive v1.0: a data- driven framework to estimate road transport emissions and temporal profiles. Geoscientific Model Development18, 9967–9990 (2025) https://doi.org/10.5194/ gmd-18-9967-2025

    2025

  67. [67]

    Physical Geography2, 184–194 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 39

    Willmott, C.J.: On the validation of models. Physical Geography2, 184–194 (1981) https://doi.org/10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 39

    work page doi:10.1080/02723646.1981.10642213 1981