arxiv: 2605.04127 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 💻 cs.LG · cs.CL· cs.CY

Recognition: 1 theorem link

Position: the Stochastic Parrot in the Coal Mine. Model Collapse is a Threat to Low-Resource Communities

Devon Jarvis , Richard Klein , Benjamin Rosman , Steven James , Stefano Sarao Mannelli

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG cs.CLcs.CY

keywords model collapselow-resource communitiesAI democratizationsynthetic datadata degradationcultural biasesgenerative models

0 comments

The pith

Model collapse from training on synthetic data disproportionately harms low-resource and marginalized communities by reducing efficiency and skewing data away from rare patterns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that model collapse, where generative models lose performance after repeated training on their own outputs, combines with heavy data needs and environmental costs to threaten AI democratization. Synthetic data pushes distributions toward frequent patterns and away from the tails, where much of the data and needs of low-resource communities sit. This leads to greater inefficiency, reinforced cultural biases, and wasted resources for groups already at a disadvantage. The authors review related critiques of large models and call for mitigation steps to prevent AI from becoming even less accessible to marginalized users.

Core claim

Model collapse threatens current efforts to democratize AI. By reducing training efficiency and skewing data distributions away from the tails of their support, model collapse disproportionately impacts low-resource and marginalized communities. The paper examines both the environmental and cultural implications of this phenomenon, situates the position within recent position papers on model collapse, and concludes with a call to action while outlining initial directions for mitigating these effects.

What carries the argument

Model collapse: the degradation in performance that arises when generative models are trained on the outputs of prior models, which reduces efficiency and skews data distributions away from the tails of their support.

If this is right

Training datasets will lose coverage of infrequent but culturally or linguistically important examples, lowering model quality for underrepresented groups.
Environmental costs of repeated training cycles will rise, placing heavier resource burdens on communities with limited infrastructure.
Cultural and linguistic biases will strengthen as dominant patterns overwrite diverse tail data.
Attempts to bootstrap low-resource AI with synthetic data will produce worse results than expected, slowing democratization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Developers could prioritize preserving authentic tail data when generating synthetic supplements.
Standards for public AI systems might include checks for collapse effects on diversity metrics.
Hybrid real-plus-synthetic training protocols with explicit tail protection could be tested as a practical countermeasure.

Load-bearing premise

That low-resource communities' data and AI needs are concentrated in the tails of distributions and that model collapse will therefore affect their democratization efforts more severely than those of high-resource groups.

What would settle it

A controlled study measuring performance drop on low-resource versus high-resource tasks after several rounds of training on synthetic data, checking whether the drop is larger for the low-resource case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04127 by Benjamin Rosman, Devon Jarvis, Richard Klein, Stefano Sarao Mannelli, Steven James.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Perplexity of multiple languages using the Latin alphabet (potentially with some added characters) calculated using a pretrained GPT-2 (Radford et al., 2019). Note how the lower-resource languages occupy a distribution closer to the tails (at a higher perplexity) than the more high-resource languages such as English. Each language distribution is calculated using 20000 input sentences (agentlans, 2025) … view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Model collapse, the degradation in performance that arises when generative models are trained on the outputs of prior models, is an increasing concern as artificially generated content proliferates. Related critiques of large language models have highlighted their tendency to reproduce frequent patterns in training data, their reliance on vast datasets, and their substantial environmental cost. Together, these factors contribute to data degradation, the reinforcement of cultural biases, and inefficient resource use. In this position paper we aim to combine these views and argue that model collapse threatens current efforts to democratize AI. By reducing training efficiency and skewing data distributions away from the tails of their support, model collapse disproportionately impacts low-resource and marginalized communities. We examine both the environmental and cultural implications of this phenomenon, situate our position within recent position papers on model collapse, and conclude with a call to action. Finally, we outline initial directions for mitigating these effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper argues model collapse disproportionately harms low-resource communities through tail erosion but provides no evidence for the disparity.

read the letter

The main point to take away is that this position paper claims model collapse will hit low-resource and marginalized communities harder than others because it reduces training efficiency and pushes data distributions away from their tails. The authors tie this to threats against democratizing AI. It does a solid job of bringing together the model collapse work with critiques of LLMs on bias reproduction and high resource use. They review how synthetic data leads to loss of rare patterns and then argue this matters more for groups with less data to begin with. The paper also covers environmental implications and cultural biases, and it ends with mitigation directions. That's a coherent way to frame the issue for a broader audience. Where it falls short is on the central assumption. The claim of disproportionate impact depends on low-resource needs being concentrated in the tails, but the text doesn't show this with any data, simulation, or specific citation to studies that compare collapse effects across resource levels. The stress test is correct here—the extrapolation from general collapse to unique harm for these communities stays untested. This paper is for readers who follow AI ethics, fairness, and sustainability discussions. Someone looking for new measurements or formal results on collapse won't find them, but it could be useful for thinking about policy priorities in data collection for diverse languages and cultures. I'd recommend sending it for peer review. The synthesis is clear and the topic is worth referee input on whether the equity link needs more backing or can stand as a position.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. This position paper argues that model collapse in generative models threatens current efforts to democratize AI. It claims that by reducing training efficiency and skewing data distributions away from the tails of their support, model collapse disproportionately impacts low-resource and marginalized communities. The manuscript synthesizes critiques of LLMs on bias reproduction, data scale, and environmental costs; examines environmental and cultural implications; situates the position among recent model collapse papers; issues a call to action; and outlines initial mitigation directions.

Significance. If the position holds, the paper would usefully highlight equity risks in the proliferation of synthetic training data, linking technical degradation mechanisms to broader democratization concerns. It synthesizes external literature on model collapse without introducing new data or derivations, and provides constructive mitigation ideas. The significance is primarily in framing and awareness-raising rather than empirical demonstration of differential impacts.

major comments (1)

Abstract: The assertion that model collapse 'disproportionately impacts low-resource and marginalized communities' by skewing distributions 'away from the tails of their support' is load-bearing for the central claim but is presented without empirical comparison, simulation results, or specific citations showing that tail-mode loss occurs at higher rates or with greater harm for low-resource corpora than for high-resource ones. This unquantified extrapolation requires either supporting analysis or reframing as a hypothesis to be tested.

minor comments (1)

The abstract is information-dense and would benefit from clearer sentence structure or bullet-point preview of the environmental/cultural sections and mitigation directions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and insightful review of our position paper. We appreciate the recognition of its value in framing equity concerns around synthetic data and the specific feedback on strengthening the central claim. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: Abstract: The assertion that model collapse 'disproportionately impacts low-resource and marginalized communities' by skewing distributions 'away from the tails of their support' is load-bearing for the central claim but is presented without empirical comparison, simulation results, or specific citations showing that tail-mode loss occurs at higher rates or with greater harm for low-resource corpora than for high-resource ones. This unquantified extrapolation requires either supporting analysis or reframing as a hypothesis to be tested.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript presents this as an extrapolation without new empirical comparisons, simulations, or direct citations quantifying differential tail loss rates. As a position paper, we synthesize established mechanisms from the model collapse literature (e.g., degradation of diversity and over-representation of frequent modes) with well-documented properties of low-resource datasets (smaller scale and greater reliance on sparse, culturally specific tail events). No targeted empirical studies demonstrating higher rates of harm for low-resource corpora currently exist in the cited literature, which is why we did not include them. To address this concern directly, we will revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusion to explicitly reframe the disproportionate impact as a hypothesis and call for future empirical investigation, rather than presenting it as a demonstrated fact. We will also strengthen the mitigation section to prioritize research on measuring these differential effects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: position paper synthesizes external literature

full rationale

This is a position paper without equations, derivations, fitted parameters, or self-referential mathematical claims. Its argument combines critiques of LLMs and model collapse from external sources to highlight impacts on low-resource communities, without reducing any central premise to quantities or definitions introduced by the paper itself. No self-citation chains, ansatzes, or renamings of known results are used to force conclusions; the claims rest on cited literature and extrapolation, remaining self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The position depends on domain assumptions about how model collapse affects data tails and community-specific AI needs, drawn from prior literature without new supporting evidence or parameters.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Training generative models on synthetic outputs leads to performance degradation and loss of tail diversity
Invoked as established from model collapse literature to ground the threat claim
domain assumption Low-resource communities rely more heavily on long-tail data for effective AI democratization
Central premise for the disproportionate impact assertion but not demonstrated

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5466 in / 1372 out tokens · 55101 ms · 2026-05-08T18:11:35.403079+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Basta, M

Basta, C., Costa-Juss `a, M. R., and Casas, N. Evaluating the underlying gender bias in contextualized word em- beddings.arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.08783,

work page arXiv 1904
[2]

M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S

Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., and Shmitchell, S. On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? InProceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and trans- parency, pp. 610–623,

2021
[3]

and Farid, H

Bohacek, M. and Farid, H. Nepotistically trained generative image models collapse. InICLR 2025 Workshop on Nav- igating and Addressing Data Problems for Foundation Models,

2025
[4]

S., Singh, J., and Anastasopoulos, A

Choi, A., Akter, S. S., Singh, J., and Anastasopoulos, A. The llm effect: Are humans truly using llms, or are they being influenced by them instead? InProceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 22032–22054,

2024
[5]

Reducing overfitting in deep networks by decorre- lating representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06068,

Cogswell, M., Ahmed, F., Girshick, R., Zitnick, L., and Ba- tra, D. Reducing overfitting in deep networks by decorre- lating representations.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06068,

work page arXiv
[6]

Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for lan- guage understanding

9 Position: the Stochastic Parrot in the Coal Mine Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., and Toutanova, K. Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for lan- guage understanding. InProceedings of the 2019 confer- ence of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics: human language technologies, volume 1 (long and sh...

2019
[7]

Dohmatob, Y

Dohmatob, E., Feng, Y ., and Kempe, J. Model collapse demystified: The case of regression.Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems, 37:46979–47013, 2024a. Dohmatob, E., Feng, Y ., Subramonian, A., and Kempe, J. Strong model collapse.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.04840, 2024b. Dohmatob, E., Feng, Y ., Yang, P., Charton, F., and Kempe, J. A tale of t...

work page arXiv
[8]

Analysis and forecast to 2026.International Energy Agency: Paris, France,

Electricity, I. Analysis and forecast to 2026.International Energy Agency: Paris, France,

2026
[9]

Po- sition: Cracking the code of cascading disparity to- wards marginalized communities

Farnadi, G., Havaei, M., and Rostamzadeh, N. Po- sition: Cracking the code of cascading disparity to- wards marginalized communities. InForty-first Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2024, Vienna, Austria, July 21-27,

2024
[10]

Feng, Y ., Dohmatob, E., Yang, P., Charton, F., and Kempe, J

URL https://openreview.net/forum? id=XDz9leJ9iK. Feng, Y ., Dohmatob, E., Yang, P., Charton, F., and Kempe, J. Beyond model collapse: Scaling up with synthesized data requires reinforcement. InICML 2024 workshop on theoretical foundations of foundation models,

2024
[11]

Is model collapse inevitable? Breaking the curse of recursion by accumulating real and synthetic data,

Gerstgrasser, M., Schaeffer, R., Dey, A., Rafailov, R., Sleight, H., Hughes, J., Korbak, T., Agrawal, R., Pai, D., Gromov, A., et al. Is model collapse inevitable? breaking the curse of recursion by accumulating real and synthetic data.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.01413,

work page arXiv
[12]

Do llms exhibit human-like cognitive biases? a large-scale sys- tematic evaluation.A Large-Scale Systematic Evaluation (September 17, 2025),

Geva, T., Goldstein, A., Lary, E., and Levy, C. Do llms exhibit human-like cognitive biases? a large-scale sys- tematic evaluation.A Large-Scale Systematic Evaluation (September 17, 2025),

2025
[13]

Yufei Huang and Deyi Xiong

Hida, R., Kaneko, M., and Okazaki, N. Social bias evalua- tion for large language models requires prompt variations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.03129,

work page arXiv
[14]

How hungry is ai? benchmarking energy, water, and carbon footprint of llm inference,

Jegham, N., Abdelatti, M., Koh, C. Y ., Elmoubarki, L., and Hendawi, A. How hungry is ai? benchmarking en- ergy, water, and carbon footprint of llm inference.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09598,

work page arXiv
[15]

Jo, E. S. and Gebru, T. Lessons from archives: Strategies for collecting sociocultural data in machine learning. In Proceedings of the 2020 conference on fairness, account- ability, and transparency, pp. 306–316,

2020
[16]

Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models

10 Position: the Stochastic Parrot in the Coal Mine Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., and Amodei, D. Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361,

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2001
[17]

L., and Koyejo, S

Kazdan, J., Schaeffer, R., Dey, A., Gerstgrasser, M., Rafailov, R., Donoho, D. L., and Koyejo, S. Collapse or thrive? perils and promises of synthetic data in a self-generating world.arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16713,

work page arXiv
[18]

Kirsten, E., Habernal, I., Nanda, V ., and Zafar, M. B. The impact of inference acceleration on bias of llms. InPro- ceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1834–1853,

2025
[19]

Your brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task

Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y . T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V ., Braunstein, I., and Maes, P. Your brain on chatgpt: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an ai assistant for essay writing task.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08872, 4,

work page arXiv
[20]

and Richardson, J

Kudo, T. and Richardson, J. Sentencepiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detok- enizer for neural text processing. InProceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing: System Demonstrations. Association for Computational Linguistics,

2018
[21]

Kurita, N

Kurita, K., Vyas, N., Pareek, A., Black, A. W., and Tsvetkov, Y . Measuring bias in contextualized word representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.07337,

work page arXiv 1906
[22]

D., Ngo, N., Veyseh, A

Lai, V . D., Ngo, N., Veyseh, A. P. B., Man, H., Dernoncourt, F., Bui, T., and Nguyen, T. H. Chatgpt beyond english: Towards a comprehensive evaluation of large language models in multilingual learning. InFindings of the asso- ciation for computational linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pp. 13171–13189,

2023
[23]

Countering language drift via visual grounding

Lee, J., Cho, K., and Kiela, D. Countering language drift via visual grounding. InProceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pp. 4385–4395,

2019
[24]

Lost in the mix: Evaluating llm understanding of code- switched text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14012,

Mohamed, A., Zhang, Y ., Vazirgiannis, M., and Shang, G. Lost in the mix: Evaluating llm understanding of code- switched text.arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.14012,

work page arXiv
[25]

com/2025/05/20/1116327/ ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/

URL https://www.technologyreview. com/2025/05/20/1116327/ ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/ . Olaleye, K., Oncevay, A., Sibue, M., Zondi, N., Terblanche, M., Mapikitla, S., Lastrucci, R., Smiley, C., and Marivate, V . Afrocs-xs: Creating a compact, high-quality, human- validated code-switched dataset for african languages. In Proceedings of the ...

2025
[26]

S., Khandelwal, A., Tanmay, K., Agarwal, U., and Choudhury, M

Rao, A. S., Khandelwal, A., Tanmay, K., Agarwal, U., and Choudhury, M. Ethical reasoning over moral alignment: A case and framework for in-context ethical policies in llms. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023, pp. 13370–13388,

2023
[27]

Schaeffer, J

Schaeffer, R., Kazdan, J., Arulandu, A. C., and Koyejo, S. Position: Model collapse does not mean what you think. arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03150,

work page arXiv
[28]

Seddik, M. E. A., Chen, S.-W., Hayou, S., Youssef, P., and Debbah, M. How bad is training on synthetic data? a statistical analysis of language model collapse.arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05090,

work page arXiv
[29]

what shapes your bias?

Shin, J., Song, H., Lee, H., Jeong, S., and Park, J. C. Ask llms directly,“what shapes your bias?”: Measuring so- cial bias in large language models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics ACL 2024, pp. 16122–16143,

2024
[30]

Towards a comprehensive understanding and accurate evaluation of societal biases in pre-trained transformers

Silva, A., Tambwekar, P., and Gombolay, M. Towards a comprehensive understanding and accurate evaluation of societal biases in pre-trained transformers. InPro- ceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 2383–2389,

2021
[31]

Spennemann, D. H. Delving into: the quantification of ai- generated content on the internet (synthetic data).arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.08755,

work page arXiv
[32]

Stankovic, M., Hirche, E., Kollatzsch, S., and Doetsch, J. N. Comment on: Your brain on chatgpt: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an ai assistant for essay writing tasks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.00856,

work page arXiv
[33]

C., and Shaw, A

Twyman, M., Keegan, B. C., and Shaw, A. Black lives matter in wikipedia: Collective memory and collaboration around online social movements. InProceedings of the 2017 acm conference on computer supported cooperative work and social computing, pp. 1400–1412,

2017
[34]

I., Aji, A

Winata, G. I., Aji, A. F., Yong, Z.-X., and Solorio, T. The decades progress on code-switching research in nlp: A systematic survey on trends and challenges.Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, pp. 2936–2978,

2023
[35]

Fairness feed- back loops: training on synthetic data amplifies bias

Wyllie, S., Shumailov, I., and Papernot, N. Fairness feed- back loops: training on synthetic data amplifies bias. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp. 2113–2147,

2024
[36]

Code- switching curriculum learning for multilingual transfer in llms

Yoo, H., Park, C., Yun, S., Oh, A., and Lee, H. Code- switching curriculum learning for multilingual transfer in llms. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2025, pp. 7816–7836, 2025a. Yoo, H., Yang, Y ., and Lee, H. Code-switching red-teaming: Llm evaluation for safety and multilingual understanding. InProceedings of the 63rd A...

2025
[37]

How to syn- thesize text data without model collapse?arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14689,

Zhu, X., Cheng, D., Li, H., Zhang, K., Hua, E., Lv, X., Ding, N., Lin, Z., Zheng, Z., and Zhou, B. How to syn- thesize text data without model collapse?arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.14689,

work page arXiv