pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04510 · v2 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🧮 math.OC · cs.AI· cs.LG

Recognition: unknown

Predictive and Prescriptive AI toward Optimizing Wildfire Suppression

Leonard Boussioux , Alexandre Jacquillat , Ryne Reger , Jacob Wachspress

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.OC cs.AIcs.LG
keywords wildfire suppressioninteger optimizationdouble machine learningresource allocationbranch-and-pricefire dynamicsprescriptive analytics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combined machine learning and integer optimization assigns crews to cut total area burned by wildfires.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a joint predictive and prescriptive method that first uses double machine learning to estimate how suppression efforts affect wildfire spread given observed conditions, then feeds those estimates into an integer optimization model that decides crew routes and assignments over time and space. The model links crew movements on a time-space-rest network to fire evolution on a time-state network and solves the resulting large-scale problem with a custom two-sided branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm. Experiments on realistic instances indicate that the resulting plans produce substantial reductions in area burned over a full season and can improve coordination when resources are shared across jurisdictions. A reader would care because better use of scarce crews during intense fire seasons directly limits damage to property, lives, and ecosystems.

Core claim

The authors formulate an integer optimization model with crew assignments on a time-space-rest network, wildfire dynamics on a time-state network, and linking constraints between them. They solve it via a two-sided branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm that uses column generation to create fire suppression plans and crew routes, knapsack cuts on the linking constraints, and specialized branching rules for non-linear dynamics. They also apply data-driven double machine learning to estimate wildfire spread from covariates and suppression efforts while mitigating historical confounding. Computational tests show the approach scales to real-world instances and yields significant reductions in area 0

What carries the argument

Integer optimization model linking crew routes on a time-space-rest network to wildfire states on a time-state network, solved by two-sided branch-and-price-and-cut with double machine learning for spread estimation.

If this is right

  • The branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm solves otherwise intractable real-world wildfire instances.
  • Optimized assignments produce significant reductions in area burned over a full wildfire season.
  • The model supplies concrete guidance for sharing limited crews across separate wildfire jurisdictions.
  • Mitigating confounding in spread estimates improves the quality of the resulting crew deployment plans.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same predictive-prescriptive structure could be adapted to other spreading hazards such as floods or invasive species.
  • Feeding seasonal climate projections into the covariates would allow the model to plan for changing fire regimes.
  • Real-time data assimilation during an active season would let assignments update as new fires start and conditions evolve.

Load-bearing premise

The double machine learning estimates wildfire spread accurately as a function of covariates and suppression efforts without residual confounding, and the optimization model captures real-world non-linear dynamics well enough for the claimed reductions to occur.

What would settle it

A controlled comparison, either in historical wildfire data or a high-fidelity simulator, in which optimized crew assignments produce statistically lower total area burned than current practices or heuristic rules.

read the original abstract

Intense wildfire seasons require critical prioritization decisions to allocate scarce suppression resources over a dispersed geographical area. This paper develops a predictive and prescriptive approach to jointly optimize crew assignments and wildfire suppression. The problem features a discrete resource-allocation structure with endogenous wildfire demand and non-linear wildfire dynamics. We formulate an integer optimization model with crew assignments on a time-space-rest network, wildfire dynamics on a time-state network, and linking constraints between them. We develop a two-sided branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm based on: (i) a two-sided column generation scheme that generates fire suppression plans and crew routes iteratively; (ii) a new family of cuts exploiting the knapsack structure of the linking constraints; and (iii) novel branching rules to accommodate non-linear wildfire dynamics. We also propose a data-driven double machine learning approach to estimate wildfire spread as a function of covariate information and suppression efforts, mitigating observed confounding between historical crew assignments and wildfire growth. Extensive computational experiments show that the optimization algorithm scales to otherwise intractable real-world instances; and that the methodology can enhance suppression effectiveness in practice, resulting in significant reductions in area burned over a wildfire season and guiding resource sharing across wildfire jurisdictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops a predictive and prescriptive AI framework for optimizing wildfire suppression resource allocation. It formulates an integer optimization model coupling crew assignments on a time-space-rest network with endogenous wildfire dynamics on a time-state network via linking constraints. The model is solved by a two-sided branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm that employs two-sided column generation, a new family of knapsack cuts on the linking constraints, and branching rules tailored to the non-linear dynamics. Wildfire spread is estimated via a data-driven double machine learning procedure intended to mitigate confounding between historical crew placements and fire growth. The abstract states that extensive computational experiments demonstrate scalability to real-world instances and yield significant reductions in area burned over a season while guiding cross-jurisdiction resource sharing.

Significance. If the empirical claims are substantiated, the work would be significant for operations research and emergency management. It advances the integration of causal machine learning with large-scale integer programming for problems with endogenous demand and non-linear dynamics, offering a template for data-driven prescriptive analytics in resource-scarce, high-stakes settings. The algorithmic contributions—particularly the two-sided column generation and knapsack cuts—are technically substantive and could extend to other network-based allocation problems with endogenous elements. The emphasis on addressing confounding in historical suppression data is a constructive step toward reliable prescriptive models.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central practical claim—that the methodology yields 'significant reductions in area burned over a wildfire season' and 'enhance[s] suppression effectiveness in practice'—rests entirely on unshown computational results. No tables, figures, baselines, instance sizes, percentage reductions, or statistical measures are referenced, which is load-bearing for the headline assertion that the approach translates to real-world benefits.
  2. [Estimation procedure (double ML section)] Estimation procedure (double ML section): The double machine learning estimator is used to recover the partial effect of suppression effort on spread for input to the optimization model. However, the manuscript provides no diagnostics (e.g., cross-validated performance of the outcome and propensity nuisance functions, or balance checks for unmeasured confounders such as micro-weather or operational priorities), leaving open the possibility that residual bias propagates into the branch-and-price solutions and undermines the claimed reductions.
  3. [Computational experiments section] Computational experiments section: The paper asserts that the algorithm 'scales to otherwise intractable real-world instances' and that the overall methodology produces significant improvements, yet no quantitative evidence—such as run times, optimality gaps, comparison against myopic or heuristic policies, or sensitivity of the prescriptive solutions to ML estimation error—is supplied. This absence prevents verification that the non-linear dynamics and linking constraints are handled accurately enough for the prescriptive claims to hold.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model formulation] The notation distinguishing the time-space-rest network for crews from the time-state network for fires would benefit from an early small-scale illustrative example to improve readability.
  2. [Estimation procedure] Ensure that all hyperparameters and cross-validation procedures for the double ML step are fully documented so that the estimation can be reproduced.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. The comments highlight important areas where the presentation of evidence can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and commit to revisions that will incorporate the requested quantitative support and diagnostics.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central practical claim—that the methodology yields 'significant reductions in area burned over a wildfire season' and 'enhance[s] suppression effectiveness in practice'—rests entirely on unshown computational results. No tables, figures, baselines, instance sizes, percentage reductions, or statistical measures are referenced, which is load-bearing for the headline assertion that the approach translates to real-world benefits.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit references to the supporting results. In the revised version we will update the abstract to cite specific quantitative outcomes from the computational experiments, including average percentage reductions in area burned, the scale of instances solved, and comparisons to baseline policies. This change will make the practical claims immediately traceable to the evidence in the body of the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Estimation procedure (double ML section)] Estimation procedure (double ML section): The double machine learning estimator is used to recover the partial effect of suppression effort on spread for input to the optimization model. However, the manuscript provides no diagnostics (e.g., cross-validated performance of the outcome and propensity nuisance functions, or balance checks for unmeasured confounders such as micro-weather or operational priorities), leaving open the possibility that residual bias propagates into the branch-and-price solutions and undermines the claimed reductions.

    Authors: We concur that additional diagnostics will increase transparency and credibility. The revised manuscript will include cross-validated performance metrics (e.g., out-of-sample R² and AUC) for both nuisance functions, covariate balance tables, and an expanded discussion of identifying assumptions together with sensitivity checks for potential unmeasured confounders such as micro-weather. These additions will be placed in the estimation section or a dedicated appendix. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Computational experiments section] Computational experiments section: The paper asserts that the algorithm 'scales to otherwise intractable real-world instances' and that the overall methodology produces significant improvements, yet no quantitative evidence—such as run times, optimality gaps, comparison against myopic or heuristic policies, or sensitivity of the prescriptive solutions to ML estimation error—is supplied. This absence prevents verification that the non-linear dynamics and linking constraints are handled accurately enough for the prescriptive claims to hold.

    Authors: We will expand the computational experiments section with new tables and figures that report run times, optimality gaps, direct comparisons against myopic and heuristic policies, and sensitivity analyses of the prescriptive solutions with respect to ML estimation error. These additions will demonstrate how the two-sided branch-and-price-and-cut algorithm handles the non-linear dynamics and linking constraints on realistic instance sizes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; predictive estimation is independent of prescriptive optimization

full rationale

The paper estimates wildfire spread dynamics via double machine learning on historical data (to control for observed confounding between crew assignments and growth), then feeds the resulting function as a fixed input into a separate integer optimization model with branch-and-price-and-cut. This is a standard predictive-prescriptive pipeline with no feedback loop, no self-definitional equations, and no renaming of fitted quantities as out-of-sample predictions. No self-citations or uniqueness theorems from prior author work are invoked as load-bearing. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external data and benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the validity of modeling wildfire dynamics via time-state networks with non-linear effects and on the double ML successfully removing confounding; these are domain assumptions rather than derived results.

free parameters (1)
  • ML hyperparameters and coefficients for wildfire spread estimation
    Double machine learning fits parameters to historical data on covariates and suppression efforts.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Wildfire spread can be represented as non-linear dynamics on a discrete time-state network
    Invoked in the formulation of the time-state network and linking constraints.
  • domain assumption Historical data contains sufficient variation to identify causal effects of suppression via double ML
    Required for the claim that confounding is mitigated.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5513 in / 1353 out tokens · 58910 ms · 2026-05-08T17:25:21.364947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2018 IEEE High Performance extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) , pages=

    Interactive supercomputing on 40,000 cores for machine learning and data analysis , author=. 2018 IEEE High Performance extreme Computing Conference (HPEC) , pages=. 2018 , organization=

  2. [2]

    Palisades Fire , year =

  3. [3]

    Operations Research , author =

    Very Large-Scale Linear Programming: A Case Study in Combining Interior Point and Simplex Methods , volume =. Operations Research , author =

  4. [4]

    Column generation , pages=

    Implementing mixed integer column generation , author=. Column generation , pages=. 2005 , publisher=

  5. [5]

    Ben Amor, Hatem M. T. and Desrosiers, Jacques and Frangioni, Antonio , urldate =. On the choice of explicit stabilizing terms in column generation , volume =. Discrete Applied Mathematics , shortjournal =. doi:10.1016/j.dam.2008.06.021 , series =

  6. [6]

    and Vance, Pamela H

    Nemhauser, George L. and Vance, Pamela H. , urldate =. Lifted cover facets of the 0–1 knapsack polytope with. Operations Research Letters , shortjournal =. doi:10.1016/0167-6377(94)90038-8 , abstract =

  7. [7]

    Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume=

    Valid inequalities for 0--1 knapsacks and mips with generalised upper bound constraints , author=. Discrete Applied Mathematics , volume=. 1990 , publisher=

  8. [8]

    Sequence independent lifting for mixed knapsack problems with

    Angulo, Alejandro and Espinoza, Daniel and Palma, Rodrigo , urldate =. Sequence independent lifting for mixed knapsack problems with. Mathematical Programming , shortjournal =. doi:10.1007/s10107-015-0902-5 , abstract =

  9. [9]

    Forest Science , volume=

    A chance-constrained programming model to allocate wildfire initial attack resources for a fire season , author=. Forest Science , volume=. 2015 , publisher=

  10. [10]

    Interagency Standards for Fire and Fire Aviation Operations , author =

  11. [11]

    National Interagency Fire Center , title =

  12. [12]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Ship scheduling and network design for cargo routing in liner shipping , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  13. [13]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Dynamic disruption management in airline networks under airport operating uncertainty , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  14. [14]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Design of regular intercity driver routes for the LTL motor carrier industry , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  15. [15]
  16. [16]

    Annual Review of Resource Economics , author =

    The Economics of Wildfire in the United States , volume =. Annual Review of Resource Economics , author =. 2022 , langid =. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-111920-014804 , abstract =

  17. [17]

    Fireline Production Rates , Author =

  18. [18]

    Fire , author =

    A Geospatial Framework to Assess Fireline Effectiveness for Large Wildfires in the Western. Fire , author =. doi:10.3390/fire3030043 , abstract =

  19. [19]

    Modelling suppression difficulty: current and future applications , volume =. Int. J. Wildland Fire , author =. doi:10.1071/wf19042_co , shorttitle =

  20. [20]

    Geophysical Research Letters , author =

    Increasing Synchronous Fire Danger in Forests of the Western United States , volume =. Geophysical Research Letters , author =. 2021 , langid =. doi:10.1029/2020GL091377 , abstract =

  21. [21]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    The first optimized railway timetable in practice , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  22. [22]

    2022 , publisher=

    Reinforcement Learning and Stochastic Optimization: A Unified Framework for Sequential Decisions , author=. 2022 , publisher=

  23. [23]

    Natural Resource Modeling , volume=

    Comparing contingency fire containment strategies using simulated random scenarios , author=. Natural Resource Modeling , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  24. [24]

    Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

    Fighting wildfires under uncertainty: A sequential resource allocation approach , author=. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence , pages=

  25. [25]

    Forest Science , volume=

    An integer programming model to optimize resource allocation for wildfire containment , author=. Forest Science , volume=. 2003 , publisher=

  26. [26]

    Forests , volume=

    Modeling ground firefighting resource activities to manage risk given uncertain weather , author=. Forests , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

  27. [27]

    Examining dispatching practices for Interagency Hotshot Crews to reduce seasonal travel distance and manage fatigue , volume =. Int. J. Wildland Fire , author =. doi:10.1071/WF17163 , abstract =

  28. [28]

    A Multi-objective Emergency Scheduling Model for Forest Fires with Priority Areas , url =

    Wang, Lubing and Wu, Peng and Chu, Feng , urldate =. A Multi-objective Emergency Scheduling Model for Forest Fires with Priority Areas , url =. 2020. doi:10.1109/IEEM45057.2020.9309821 , abstract =

  29. [29]

    Optimization and Engineering , volume=

    Application of decomposition techniques in a wildfire suppression optimization model , author=. Optimization and Engineering , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  30. [30]

    JuMP 1.0: recent improvements to a modeling language for mathematical optimization

    Miles Lubin and Oscar Dowson and Joaquim. Mathematical Programming Computation , year =. doi:10.1007/s12532-023-00239-3 , pages =

  31. [31]

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research , volume=

    Spatial optimization of operationally relevant large fire confine and point protection strategies: Model development and test cases , author=. Canadian Journal of Forest Research , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  32. [32]

    Forests , volume=

    An integer linear programming model to select and temporally allocate resources for fighting forest fires , author=. Forests , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

  33. [33]

    and Wei, Yu and Calkin, David E

    Thompson, Matthew P. and Wei, Yu and Calkin, David E. and O’Connor, Christopher D. and Dunn, Christopher J. and Anderson, Nathaniel M. and Hogland, John S. , urldate =. Risk Management and Analytics in Wildfire Response , volume =. Current Forestry Reports , shortjournal =. doi:10.1007/s40725-019-00101-7 , abstract =

  34. [34]

    Forest Science , volume=

    Toward efficient management of large fires: a mixed integer programming model and two iterative approaches , author=. Forest Science , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  35. [35]

    Resource-Constrained Emergency Scheduling for Forest Fires with Priority Areas: An Efficient Integer-Programming Approach , volume =

    Wu, Peng and Cheng, Junheng and Feng, Chenpeng , urldate =. Resource-Constrained Emergency Scheduling for Forest Fires with Priority Areas: An Efficient Integer-Programming Approach , volume =. doi:10.1002/tee.22805 , shorttitle =

  36. [36]

    Fire , author =

    Decision Support Models and Methodologies for Fire Suppression , volume =. Fire , author =. doi:10.3390/fire6020037 , abstract =

  37. [37]

    and Martell, David L

    Thompson, Matthew P. and Martell, David L. and Belval, Erin J. , date =. How Operations Research and Management Science Can Help Address the Wildfire Crisis

  38. [38]

    Journal of Combinatorial Optimization , volume=

    Sequence independent lifting in mixed integer programming , author=. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

  39. [39]

    Operations Research , volume=

    A note on zero-one programming , author=. Operations Research , volume=. 1975 , publisher=

  40. [40]

    Operations research , volume=

    Facets and strong valid inequalities for integer programs , author=. Operations research , volume=. 1976 , publisher=

  41. [41]

    Operations Research Letters , volume=

    Branching rules revisited , author=. Operations Research Letters , volume=. 2005 , publisher=

  42. [42]

    Operations Research , year=

    Branch-and-Price for Prescriptive Contagion Analytics , author=. Operations Research , year=

  43. [43]

    and Belval, Erin J

    Thompson, Matthew P. and Belval, Erin J. , Howpublished =

  44. [44]

    Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=

    Physics-based model of wildfire propagation towards faster-than-real-time simulations , author=. Computers & Mathematics with Applications , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  45. [45]

    IEEE systems Journal , volume=

    A comparative review on wildfire simulators , author=. IEEE systems Journal , volume=. 2011 , publisher=

  46. [46]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Benders decomposition for simultaneous aircraft routing and crew scheduling , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  47. [47]

    Operations Research , year=

    Vessel Service Planning in Seaports , author=. Operations Research , year=

  48. [48]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Branch and price for the time-dependent vehicle routing problem with time windows , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  49. [49]

    INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=

    New state-space relaxations for solving the traveling salesman problem with time windows , author=. INFORMS Journal on Computing , volume=. 2012 , publisher=

  50. [50]

    Operations research , volume=

    A new optimization algorithm for the vehicle routing problem with time windows , author=. Operations research , volume=. 1992 , publisher=

  51. [51]

    Operations research , volume=

    Vehicle routing with time windows: Two optimization algorithms , author=. Operations research , volume=. 1997 , publisher=

  52. [52]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    A branch-and-cut procedure for the vehicle routing problem with time windows , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2002 , publisher=

  53. [53]

    Manufacturing & Service Operations Management , volume=

    The consistent vehicle routing problem , author=. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  54. [54]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    European driver rules in vehicle routing with time windows , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  55. [55]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Hours of service regulations in road freight transport: An optimization-based international assessment , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  56. [56]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Routing Optimization with Generalized Consistency Requirements , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  57. [57]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Vehicle scheduling and routing with drivers' working hours , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2009 , publisher=

  58. [58]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    Workforce management in periodic delivery operations , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  59. [59]

    Transportation Science , volume=

    The period vehicle routing problem with service choice , author=. Transportation Science , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  60. [60]

    Journal of Global Optimization , volume=

    Branch-and-price for a class of nonconvex mixed-integer nonlinear programs , author=. Journal of Global Optimization , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  61. [61]

    Operations research , volume=

    Branch-and-price: Column generation for solving huge integer programs , author=. Operations research , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

  62. [62]

    Journal of Global Optimization , volume=

    Branch-and-price-and-cut algorithms for solving the reliable h-paths problem , author=. Journal of Global Optimization , volume=. 2008 , publisher=

  63. [63]

    New route relaxation and pricing strategies for the vehicle routing problem , Volume =

    Baldacci, Roberto and Mingozzi, Aristide and Roberti, Roberto , Journal =. New route relaxation and pricing strategies for the vehicle routing problem , Volume =

  64. [64]

    Global change biology , volume=

    Towards a whole-system framework for wildfire monitoring using Earth observations , author=. Global change biology , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  65. [65]

    Fire , volume=

    A machine-learning approach to predicting daily wildfire expansion rate , author=. Fire , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

  66. [66]

    Environmental Reviews , volume=

    A review of machine learning applications in wildfire science and management , author=. Environmental Reviews , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  67. [67]

    2021 , publisher=

    Wildland fire behaviour: dynamics, principles and processes , author=. 2021 , publisher=

  68. [68]

    Information Systems Research , year=

    Integrated decision support for disaster risk management: Aiding preparedness and response decisions in wildfire management , author=. Information Systems Research , year=

  69. [69]

    Journal of Heuristics , volume=

    Scheduling in a multi-processor environment with deteriorating job processing times and decreasing values: the case of forest fires , author=. Journal of Heuristics , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  70. [70]

    Operational Research , volume=

    Scheduling a single fire fighting resource with deteriorating fire suppression times and set-up times , author=. Operational Research , volume=. 2010 , publisher=

  71. [71]

    Fire Technology , volume=

    Evaluating crown fire rate of spread predictions from physics-based models , author=. Fire Technology , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

  72. [72]

    Environmental Modelling & Software , volume=

    Uncertainty associated with model predictions of surface and crown fire rates of spread , author=. Environmental Modelling & Software , volume=. 2013 , publisher=

  73. [73]

    Canadian Journal of Forest Research , volume=

    Evaluating a model for predicting active crown fire rate of spread using wildfire observations , author=. Canadian Journal of Forest Research , volume=. 2006 , publisher=

  74. [74]

    2009 ieee applied imagery pattern recognition workshop (aipr 2009) , pages=

    Data driven approach to estimating fire danger from satellite images and weather information , author=. 2009 ieee applied imagery pattern recognition workshop (aipr 2009) , pages=. 2009 , organization=

  75. [75]

    , author=

    FireCast: Leveraging Deep Learning to Predict Wildfire Spread. , author=. IJCAI , pages=

  76. [76]

    Environmental Modelling & Software , volume=

    Prediction of wildfire rate of spread in grasslands using machine learning methods , author=. Environmental Modelling & Software , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

  77. [77]

    International Transactions in Operational Research , volume=

    Spatial Optimization of Resources Deployment for Forest-Fire Management , author=. International Transactions in Operational Research , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

  78. [78]

    Spatial planning of fire-agency stations as a function of wildfire likelihood in

    Sakellariou, Stavros and Parisien, Marc-Andr. Spatial planning of fire-agency stations as a function of wildfire likelihood in. Science of the total environment , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  79. [79]

    Natural Hazards , volume=

    Optimizing the location of aerial resources to combat wildfires: a case study of Portugal , author=. Natural Hazards , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

  80. [80]

    International journal of wildland fire , volume=

    A simulation and optimisation procedure to model daily suppression resource transfers during a fire season in Colorado , author=. International journal of wildland fire , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

Showing first 80 references.