pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04890 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.GA

Recognition: unknown

Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory to Gamma-Ray Signals in Dwarf Irregular Galaxies

Jaume Zuriaga-Puig , Viviana Gammaldi , Miguel \'A. S\'anchez-Conde
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA
keywords dwarf irregular galaxiesdark matter annihilationCherenkov Telescope Array Observatorygamma-ray astronomyWIMP indirect detectiondark matter substructurescuspy and cored profiles
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dwarf irregular galaxies could let the Cherenkov Telescope Array exclude dark matter annihilation cross sections around 2×10^{-24} cm³/s for 100 GeV WIMPs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates dwarf irregular galaxies as targets for gamma-ray observations with the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory to search for dark matter annihilation signals. These galaxies are expected to have low astrophysical gamma-ray emission due to their low star formation rates, making them cleaner than many other targets. The authors select the four best candidates and calculate sensitivity prospects to dark matter signals, including the boost from dark matter substructures and considering both cuspy and cored density profiles. The resulting combined limits would be competitive with those from galaxy clusters and could surpass projections for dwarf spheroidals in velocity-dependent annihilation cases. This work positions dwarf irregular galaxies as useful targets for both dark matter indirect detection and possible astrophysical gamma-ray studies.

Core claim

The central claim is that the best four dwarf irregular galaxies, when observed with the CTAO, yield projected upper limits on the dark matter annihilation cross section of approximately 2×10^{-24} cm³ s^{-1} for 100 GeV WIMPs annihilating to tau pairs, after including subhalo contributions to the J-factor. For Sommerfeld-enhanced, velocity-dependent annihilation the subhalos produce stronger constraints than those expected from dwarf spheroidal galaxies. The analysis covers both cuspy and cored dark matter density profiles and also assesses prospects for detecting the galaxies' own astrophysical emission.

What carries the argument

The CTAO sensitivity calculation to gamma-ray flux from WIMP annihilation, which folds the astrophysical J-factor (integrated over the dark matter density profile plus substructures) with instrument response functions for both cuspy and cored halo models to produce projected exclusion curves on the annihilation cross section.

If this is right

  • Combined limits from the four best dIrrs reach sensitivities competitive with galaxy clusters for standard annihilation channels.
  • Subhalo contributions allow stronger constraints than dwarf spheroidals when annihilation is velocity-dependent.
  • The same targets also offer prospects for detecting intrinsic astrophysical gamma-ray emission from the galaxies themselves.
  • Limits are sensitive to the choice between cuspy and cored dark matter density profiles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Including dIrrs would broaden the set of indirect-detection targets beyond the usual dwarf spheroidals and clusters.
  • Independent measurements that settle the cusp-core debate for these galaxies would tighten or loosen the projected dark matter limits.
  • Observation time allocation strategies for the CTAO could be updated to include dIrrs as a standard class of targets.

Load-bearing premise

Dwarf irregular galaxies have sufficiently low astrophysical gamma-ray backgrounds to allow clean separation of a potential dark matter signal, along with reliable modeling of their dark matter density profiles and substructures.

What would settle it

CTA O gamma-ray observations of the selected dwarf irregular galaxies that either detect unexpected high astrophysical emission or fail to reach the projected sensitivity level of 2×10^{-24} cm³ s^{-1} would directly test the central claim.

read the original abstract

Dwarf irregular galaxies (dIrrs) are rotationally supported galaxies with a low star formation rate. Thus, their gamma-ray astrophysical emission is expected to be low, making them interesting targets for WIMP dark matter (DM) indirect searches. In this work, we build upon previous work on these objects in this DM context, and identify the best four dIrrs to be observed by the forthcoming Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO). Since dIrrs have not been detected in gamma rays yet, we first explore the prospects for detecting their astrophysical emission with the CTAO. Secondly, we compute the CTAO sensitivity prospects to a DM annihilating signal from these objects, accounting for the presence of DM substructures in them. We do so for both cuspy and cored DM density profiles, as the cusp-core debate remains particularly open for dIrrs. Our best combined limits show the potential to exclude DM annihilation cross-section values around $2\times 10^{-24} \ \mathrm{cm^{3}}\mathrm{s^{-1}}$ for 100 GeV WIMP masses annihilating in the $\tau^+\tau^-$ channel. These prospective results are competitive with and complementary to benchmark targets such as galaxy clusters. We also analyze the case of the velocity-dependent annihilation cross-section (Sommerfeld enhancement), obtaining projected DM constraints that exceed those expected for dwarf spheroidal galaxies, thanks to the contribution of subhalos to the signal. We conclude that dIrrs are compelling targets for the CTAO, not only for DM indirect searches but also as possible astrophysical sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper identifies the four most promising dwarf irregular galaxies (dIrrs) as targets for the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO), computes projected sensitivities to their astrophysical gamma-ray emission, and derives CTAO upper limits on the dark matter (DM) annihilation cross-section <σv> for both cuspy (NFW) and cored density profiles while including substructure boosts. The central claim is that the best combined limits reach ~2×10^{-24} cm³ s^{-1} at 100 GeV for the τ⁺τ⁻ channel, competitive with galaxy clusters, with even stronger projected constraints in the Sommerfeld-enhanced case due to subhalos.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions hold, the work usefully expands the target list for CTAO indirect DM searches beyond dwarf spheroidals and clusters by highlighting dIrrs' low astrophysical backgrounds. The explicit comparison of cuspy versus cored profiles and the inclusion of substructure for velocity-dependent annihilation are strengths that allow readers to assess robustness. The results are forward-looking sensitivity projections rather than data-driven constraints.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Results): The headline claim that the best combined limits exclude <σv> ~2×10^{-24} cm³ s^{-1} (100 GeV, τ⁺τ⁻) and are 'competitive with ... galaxy clusters' is load-bearing on the optimistic cuspy+substructure J-factors; the text must explicitly quote the corresponding cored-profile limits (which the modeling section shows are weaker by 1–2 orders of magnitude) so that competitiveness can be evaluated against rotation-curve evidence favoring cores in dIrrs.
  2. [§4.2] §4.2 (DM density profiles): The J-factor integrals for the selected dIrrs are computed for both NFW and cored profiles, but the paper does not tabulate the numerical J-factor values or the precise core radii adopted; without these, it is impossible to verify how the quoted 2×10^{-24} limit scales when the cored case (favored by many rotation-curve studies) is used.
  3. [§3] §3 (Astrophysical emission prospects): The assumption that dIrrs have sufficiently low astrophysical gamma-ray backgrounds for clean DM signal separation is central to both the detection prospects and the DM limits, yet the expected flux from star-formation-related processes is only qualitatively described; quantitative modeling of the background spectrum and its impact on the sensitivity curves is required.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Table 1] Table 1 (target properties): The distance and stellar mass values for the four selected dIrrs should include references to the original observational papers.
  2. [Figure 3] Figure 3 (sensitivity curves): The legend should explicitly label which curves correspond to cuspy versus cored profiles and whether substructure is included.
  3. [§4.3] The Sommerfeld enhancement section would benefit from a brief statement of the velocity dispersion assumed for the subhalos, as this directly affects the boost.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important points for improving clarity and robustness, particularly regarding the presentation of cored-profile results, numerical values, and background estimates. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §5] Abstract and §5 (Results): The headline claim that the best combined limits exclude <σv> ~2×10^{-24} cm³ s^{-1} (100 GeV, τ⁺τ⁻) and are 'competitive with ... galaxy clusters' is load-bearing on the optimistic cuspy+substructure J-factors; the text must explicitly quote the corresponding cored-profile limits (which the modeling section shows are weaker by 1–2 orders of magnitude) so that competitiveness can be evaluated against rotation-curve evidence favoring cores in dIrrs.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract and §5 should explicitly state the cored-profile limits to allow readers to evaluate the competitiveness claim in the context of rotation-curve evidence favoring cores. In the revised manuscript we will quote the corresponding cored limits (weaker by 1–2 orders of magnitude) in both the abstract and §5, together with a short discussion of the implications for the comparison with galaxy clusters. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4.2] §4.2 (DM density profiles): The J-factor integrals for the selected dIrrs are computed for both NFW and cored profiles, but the paper does not tabulate the numerical J-factor values or the precise core radii adopted; without these, it is impossible to verify how the quoted 2×10^{-24} limit scales when the cored case (favored by many rotation-curve studies) is used.

    Authors: We will add a dedicated table in §4.2 that reports the numerical J-factor values for each of the four dIrrs under both NFW and cored profiles, as well as the precise core radii adopted for the cored case. This will permit direct verification of the scaling between the two density-profile assumptions. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3] §3 (Astrophysical emission prospects): The assumption that dIrrs have sufficiently low astrophysical gamma-ray backgrounds for clean DM signal separation is central to both the detection prospects and the DM limits, yet the expected flux from star-formation-related processes is only qualitatively described; quantitative modeling of the background spectrum and its impact on the sensitivity curves is required.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative treatment of the astrophysical background would strengthen the analysis. Because dIrrs remain undetected in gamma rays, a full spectral model is not feasible from existing data; however, we will add order-of-magnitude estimates of the expected background flux based on star-formation-rate scaling relations from the literature and illustrate their effect on the CTAO sensitivity curves in the revised §3. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: sensitivity projections rest on external assumptions and telescope performance models

full rationale

The paper computes prospective CTAO limits on DM annihilation by folding assumed DM density profiles (cuspy/cored), substructure boosts, and instrument response functions into expected signal and background rates. No equation defines a J-factor or limit in terms of the final sensitivity result itself, nor does any 'prediction' reduce to a parameter fitted from the same dataset. Self-citations to prior dIrr work are present but supply only the target list and profile choices; the central sensitivity calculation remains independent of those citations and is falsifiable against future observations. The optimistic cuspy+substructure case is an explicit modeling choice, not a definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard assumptions in indirect dark matter detection that are not derived in the paper: specific dark matter density profiles (cuspy or cored), the presence and boost factors from subhalos, and the expected low level of astrophysical gamma-ray emission from dIrrs. No new entities are invented.

free parameters (2)
  • DM density profile parameters
    Cuspy versus cored profiles are chosen; their normalization and scale radii are typically fitted or assumed from prior observations.
  • Substructure boost factors
    The contribution of DM subhalos to the annihilation signal is modeled with parameters that depend on simulation results or assumptions.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Dwarf irregular galaxies have low astrophysical gamma-ray emission due to low star formation rates.
    Invoked to justify them as clean targets for DM searches; stated in the abstract motivation.
  • domain assumption Dark matter substructures exist and enhance the annihilation signal in dIrrs.
    Used to compute improved limits, especially for velocity-dependent cases.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5614 in / 1694 out tokens · 45530 ms · 2026-05-08T16:00:08.546356+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Steigman, B

    G. Steigman, B. Dasgupta and J.F. Beacom,Precise Relic WIMP Abundance and its Impact on Searches for Dark Matter Annihilation,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 023506 [1204.3622]

    work page arXiv 2012

  2. [2]

    A History of Dark Matter

    G. Bertone and D. Hooper,History of dark matter,Reviews of Modern Physics90(2018) 045002 [1605.04909]. [3]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Gaskins,A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter,Contemporary Physics57 (2016) 496 [1604.00014]

    J.M. Gaskins,A review of indirect searches for particle dark matter,Contemporary Physics57 (2016) 496 [1604.00014]. – 41 – 10−1 100 101 Energy [TeV] 10−19 10−17 10−15 10−13 10−11 10−9 E2 dΦ dE [GeV s −1 cm−2] IC1613, mDM = 10 TeV, θint = 0.3 ◦ SFR GDE b¯b τ +τ − ZZ W +W − 10−1 100 101 Energy [TeV] 10−17 10−15 10−13 10−11 10−9 10−7 E2 dΦ dE [GeV s −1 cm−2]...

    work page arXiv 2016

  4. [4]

    Particle Dark Matter: Evidence, Candidates and Constraints

    G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk,Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept.405(2005) 279 [hep-ph/0404175]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    WIMP dark matter candidates and searches - current status and future prospects

    L. Roszkowski, E.M. Sessolo and S. Trojanowski,WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects,Reports on Progress in Physics81(2018) 066201 [1707.06277]. [7]Fermi-LATcollaboration,Sensitivity Projections for Dark Matter Searches with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Phys. Rept.636(2016) 1 [1605.02016]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2018

  6. [6]

    , Phys.Rev.D 109 (2024) 063024 [arXiv:2311.04982]. [585]H.E.S.S.Collaboration,\Search for Photon-Linelike Sig- natures from Dark Matter Annihilations with H.E.S.S

    A. McDaniel, M. Ajello, C.M. Karwin, M. Di Mauro, A. Drlica-Wagner and M.A. Sánchez-Conde,Legacy analysis of dark matter annihilation from the Milky Way dwarf spheroidal galaxies with 14 years of Fermi-LAT data,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 063024 [2311.04982]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Acciari, S

    V.A. Acciari, S. Ansoldi, L.A. Antonelli, A. Arbet Engels, M. Artero, K. Asano et al., Combined searches for dark matter in dwarf spheroidal galaxies observed with the MAGIC telescopes, including new data from Coma Berenices and Draco,Physics of the Dark Universe 35(2022) 100912 [2111.15009]. [10]H.E.S.S.collaboration,Search for dark matter signals toward...

    work page arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    K. Abe, S. Abe, J. Abhir, A. Abhishek, F. Acero, A. Acharyya et al.,Prospects for dark matter observations in dwarf spheroidal galaxies with the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.(2025) [2508.19120]

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Mauro,Characteristics of the Galactic Center excess measured with 11 years of Fermi-LAT data,Physical Review D103(2021) 063029

    M.D. Mauro,Characteristics of the Galactic Center excess measured with 11 years of Fermi-LAT data,Physical Review D103(2021) 063029. [13]CTAcollaboration,Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to a dark matter signal from the Galactic centre,JCAP01(2021) 057 [2007.16129]

    work page arXiv 2021

  10. [10]

    Cembranos, V

    J.A.R. Cembranos, V. Gammaldi and A.L. Maroto,Possible dark matter origin of the gamma ray emission from the Galactic Center observed by HESS,Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology86(2012) 103506 [1204.0655]. [15]H.E.S.S.collaboration,Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals in the H.E.S.S. Inner Galaxy Survey,Phys. Rev. Lett....

    work page arXiv 2012

  11. [11]

    Zuriaga-Puig, V

    J. Zuriaga-Puig, V. Gammaldi, D. Gaggero, T. Lacroix and M.A. Sánchez-Conde,Multi-TeV dark matter density in the inner Milky Way halo: spectral and dynamical constraints,JCAP 2023(2023) 063 [2307.06823]

    work page arXiv 2023

  12. [12]

    Di Mauro, J

    M. Di Mauro, J. Pérez-Romero, M.A. Sánchez-Conde and N. Fornengo,Constraining the dark matter contribution ofγrays in clusters of galaxies using Fermi-LAT data,Physical Review D 107(2023) 083030 [2303.16930]. [18]H.E.S.S.collaboration,Search for Dark Matter Annihilation Signals from the Fornax Galaxy Cluster with H.E.S.S.,The Astrophysical Journal750(2012...

    work page arXiv 2023

  13. [13]

    Gammaldi, B

    V. Gammaldi, B. Zaldívar, M.A. Sánchez-Conde and J. Coronado-Blázquez,A search for dark matter among Fermi-LAT unidentified sources with systematic features in machine learning, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.520(2023) 1348 [2207.09307]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Eckner, V

    C. Eckner, V. Vodeb, T. Satheesh, F. Calore, M. Hütten, P. Martin et al.,Detecting dark matter sub-halos in the Galactic plane with the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2501.09789 [2501.09789]

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [15]

    Circiello, A

    A. Circiello, A. McDaniel, A. Drlica-Wagner, C. Karwin, M. Ajello, M.D. Mauro et al., Evaluating the Potential to Constrain Dark Matter Annihilation with Fermi-LAT Observations of Ultrafaint Compact Stellar Systems,The Astrophysical Journal978(2025) L43 [2404.01181]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Fernandez-Suarez and M.A

    C. Fernandez-Suarez and M.A. Sanchez-Conde,A Search for Dark Matter Annihilation in Stellar Streams with the Fermi-LAT,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2502.15656 [2502.15656]

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    Evans, F

    N.W. Evans, F. Ferrer and S. Sarkar,A travel guide to the dark matter annihilation signal, Physical Review D69(2004) 123501 [astro-ph/0311145]

    work page arXiv 2004

  18. [18]

    Geringer-Sameth, S.M

    A. Geringer-Sameth, S.M. Koushiappas and M. Walker,Dwarf galaxy annihilation and decay emission profiles for dark matter experiments,Astrophys. J.801(2015) 74 [1408.0002]

    work page arXiv 2015

  19. [19]

    Abdalla, H

    H. Abdalla, H. Abe, F. Acero, A. Acharyya, R. Adam, I. Agudo et al.,Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array for probing cosmology and fundamental physics with gamma-ray propagation,JCAP2021(2021) 048 [2010.01349]

    work page arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Gammaldi, E

    V. Gammaldi, E. Karukes and P. Salucci,Theoretical predictions for dark matter detection in dwarf irregular galaxies with gamma rays,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083008 [1706.01843]. – 43 –

    work page arXiv 2018

  21. [21]

    doi:10.1142/10986 , adsurl =

    V. Gammaldi, J. Pérez-Romero, J. Coronado-Blázquez, M. Di Mauro, E.V. Karukes, M.A. Sánchez-Conde et al.,Dark matter search in dwarf irregular galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Physical Review D104(2021) 083026 [2109.11291]. [29]HA WCcollaboration,Searching for TeV Dark Matter in Irregular Dwarf Galaxies with HAWC Observatory,Astrophys. J.945(2...

    work page doi:10.1142/10986 2021

  22. [22]

    Kornecki, J

    P. Kornecki, J. Biteau, C. Boisson and P. Cristofari,Hunting star forming galaxies in the gamma-ray domain,A&A699(2025) A43 [2504.17024]

    work page arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Ackermann et al.,GeV Observations of Star-forming Galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,Astrophys

    M. Ackermann, M. Ajello, A. Allafort, L. Baldini, J. Ballet, D. Bastieri et al.,GeV Observations of Star-forming Galaxies with the Fermi Large Area Telescope,The Astrophysical Journal755(2012) 164 [1206.1346]

    work page arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Ajello, M

    M. Ajello, M. Di Mauro, V.S. Paliya and S. Garrappa,Theγ-Ray Emission of Star-forming Galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal894(2020) 88 [2003.05493]

    work page arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Shimono, T

    N. Shimono, T. Totani and T. Sudoh,Prospects of newly detecting nearby star-forming galaxies by the Cherenkov Telescope Array,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society506 (2021) 6212 [2103.08287]

    work page arXiv 2021

  26. [26]

    Acharyya, C.B

    A. Acharyya, C.B. Adams, P. Bangale, J.T. Bartkoske, W. Benbow, J.H. Buckley et al.,An In-depth Study of Gamma Rays from the Starburst Galaxy M82 with VERITAS,The Astrophysical Journal981(2025) 189 [2501.09998]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    H. E. S. S. Collaboration, H. Abdalla, F. Aharonian, F. Ait Benkhali, E.O. Angüner, M. Arakawa et al.,The starburst galaxy NGC 253 revisited by H.E.S.S. and Fermi-LAT, Astronomy & Astrophysics617(2018) A73 [1806.03866]. [38]CTA Consortiumcollaboration,Prospects for a survey of the galactic plane with the Cherenkov Telescope Array,JCAP10(2024) 081 [2310.02828]

    work page arXiv 2018

  28. [28]

    Martin,Interstellar gamma-ray emission from cosmic rays in star-forming galaxies,Astron

    P. Martin,Interstellar gamma-ray emission from cosmic rays in star-forming galaxies,Astron. Astrophys.564(2014) A61 [1402.0383]

    work page arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    The observed properties of dwarf galaxies in and around the Local Group

    A.W. McConnachie,The Observed Properties of Dwarf Galaxies in and around the Local Group,Astron. J.144(2012) 4 [1204.1562]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    Oh et al.,High-resolution mass models of dwarf galaxies from LITTLE THINGS,Astron

    S.-H. Oh et al.,High-resolution mass models of dwarf galaxies from LITTLE THINGS,Astron. J.149(2015) 180 [1502.01281]

    work page arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    The Star Forming Main Sequence of Dwarf Low Surface Brightness Galaxies

    S.S. McGaugh, J.M. Schombert and F. Lelli,The Star-forming Main Sequence of Dwarf Low Surface Brightness Galaxies,The Astrophysical Journal851(2017) 22 [1710.11236]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Luque, D

    P.D.l.T. Luque, D. Gaggero, D. Grasso, O. Fornieri, K. Egberts, C. Steppa et al.,Galactic diffuse gamma rays meet the PeV frontier,Astron. Astrophys.672(2023) A58 [2203.15759]

    work page arXiv 2023

  33. [33]

    Evoli, D

    C. Evoli, D. Gaggero, A. Vittino, G.D. Bernardo, M.D. Mauro, A. Ligorini et al.,Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: I. numerical solver and astrophysical ingredients,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2017(2017) 015

    2017

  34. [34]

    Evoli, D

    C. Evoli, D. Gaggero, A. Vittino, M. Di Mauro, D. Grasso and M.N. Mazziotta,Cosmic-ray propagation with DRAGON2: II. Nuclear interactions with the interstellar gas,JCAP07 (2018) 006 [1711.09616]

    work page arXiv 2018

  35. [35]

    Gaggero, A

    D. Gaggero, A. Urbano, M. Valli and P. Ullio,Gamma-ray sky points to radial gradients in cosmic-ray transport,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 083012 [1411.7623]. – 44 –

    work page arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    Gaggero, D

    D. Gaggero, D. Grasso, A. Marinelli, M. Taoso and A. Urbano,Diffuse cosmic rays shining in the Galactic center: A novel interpretation of H.E.S.S. and Fermi-LATγ-ray data,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 031101 [1702.01124]

    work page arXiv 2017

  37. [37]

    Cirelli, G

    M. Cirelli, G. Corcella, A. Hektor, G. Hütsi, M. Kadastik, P. Panci et al.,PPPC 4 DM ID: a poor particle physicist cookbook for dark matter indirect detection,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2011(2011) 051

    2011

  38. [38]

    Ciafaloni, D

    P. Ciafaloni, D. Comelli, A. Riotto, F. Sala, A. Strumia and A. Urbano,Weak Corrections are Relevant for Dark Matter Indirect Detection,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2011(2010)

    2011

  39. [39]

    Saldana-Lopez, A

    A. Saldana-Lopez, A. Domínguez, P.G. Pérez-González, J. Finke, M. Ajello, J.R. Primack et al.,An observational determination of the evolving extragalactic background light from the multiwavelength HST/CANDELS survey in the Fermi and CTA era,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.507(2021) 5144 [2012.03035]

    work page arXiv 2021

  40. [40]

    Djuvsland, J

    J.I. Djuvsland, J. Hinton and B. Reville,Inverse Compton emission from heavy WIMP annihilations in the Galactic Centre,Phys. Dark Univ.39(2023) 101157 [2212.05785]

    work page arXiv 2023

  41. [41]

    J. Buch, M. Cirelli, G. Giesen and M. Taoso,PPPC 4 DM secondary: A Poor Particle Physicist Cookbook for secondary radiation from Dark Matter,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2015(2015)

    2015

  42. [42]

    Burkert, The Astrophysical Journal Letters447, L25 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9504041

    A. Burkert,The Structure of dark matter halos in dwarf galaxies,Astrophys. J. Lett.447 (1995) L25 [astro-ph/9504041]

    work page arXiv 1995

  43. [43]

    Karukes and P

    E.V. Karukes and P. Salucci,The universal rotation curve of dwarf disc galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.465(2017) 4703 [1609.06903]

    work page arXiv 2017

  44. [44]

    The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos

    J.F. Navarro, C.S. Frenk and S.D.M. White,The Structure of cold dark matter halos, Astrophys. J.462(1996) 563 [astro-ph/9508025]

    work page Pith review arXiv 1996

  45. [45]

    Sánchez-Conde and F

    M.A. Sánchez-Conde and F. Prada,The flattening of the concentration-mass relation towards low halo masses and its implications for the annihilation signal boost,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.442(2014) 2271 [1312.1729]

    work page arXiv 2014

  46. [46]

    S. Ando, T. Ishiyama and N. Hiroshima,Halo Substructure Boosts to the Signatures of Dark Matter Annihilation,Galaxies7(2019) 68 [1903.11427]

    work page arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Aguirre-Santaella and M.A

    A. Aguirre-Santaella and M.A. Sánchez-Conde,The viability of low-mass subhaloes as targets for gamma-ray dark matter searches,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.530(2024) 2496 [2309.02330]

    work page arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Prada, MNRAS466, 4974 (2017), arXiv:1603.04057 [astro-ph.CO]

    Á. Moliné, M.A. Sánchez-Conde, S. Palomares-Ruiz and F. Prada,Characterization of subhalo structural properties and implications for dark matter annihilation signals,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.466(2017) 4974 [1603.04057]

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Aguirre-Santaella, M.A

    A. Aguirre-Santaella, M.A. Sánchez-Conde, G. Ogiya, J. Stücker and R.E. Angulo,Shedding light on low-mass subhalo survival and annihilation luminosity with numerical simulations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.518(2023) 93 [2207.08652]

    work page arXiv 2023

  50. [50]

    Aguirre-Santaella, M.A

    A. Aguirre-Santaella, M.A. Sánchez-Conde and G. Ogiya,New insights on low-mass dark matter subhalo tidal tracks via numerical simulations,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2506.01152 [2506.01152]

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    Angulo, O

    R.E. Angulo, O. Hahn, A.D. Ludlow and S. Bonoli,Earth-mass haloes and the emergence of nfw density profiles,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society471(2017) 4687 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/471/4/4687/19644219/stx1658.pdf]

    2017

  52. [52]

    Delos and S.D.M

    M.S. Delos and S.D.M. White,Inner cusps of the first dark matter haloes: formation and survival in a cosmological context,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society518 – 45 – (2022) 3509 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/518/3/3509/47466116/stac3373.pdf]

    2022

  53. [53]

    Bonnivard, M

    V. Bonnivard, M. Hütten, E. Nezri, A. Charbonnier, C. Combet and D. Maurin,CLUMPY: Jeans analysis,γ-ray andνfluxes from dark matter (sub-)structures,Computer Physics Communications200(2016) 336

    2016

  54. [54]

    Charbonnier, C

    A. Charbonnier, C. Combet and D. Maurin,CLUMPY: A code forγ-ray signals from dark matter structures,Computer Physics Communications183(2012) 656 [1201.4728]

    work page arXiv 2012

  55. [55]

    Hütten, C

    M. Hütten, C. Combet and D. Maurin,CLUMPY v3:γ-ray andνsignals from dark matter at all scales,Computer Physics Communications235(2019) 336 [1806.08639]

    work page arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Astron. Astrophys

    A. Donath, R. Terrier, Q. Remy, A. Sinha, C. Nigro, F. Pintore et al.,Gammapy: A Python package for gamma-ray astronomy,"Astron. Astrophys."678(2023) A157 [2308.13584]

    work page arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory and Cherenkov Telescope Array Consortium,CTAO Instrument Response Functions - prod5 version v0.1,Zenodov0.1(2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Conrad,Statistical issues in astrophysical searches for particle dark matter,Astroparticle Physics62(2015) 165 [1407.6617]

    J. Conrad,Statistical issues in astrophysical searches for particle dark matter,Astroparticle Physics62(2015) 165 [1407.6617]

    work page arXiv 2015

  59. [59]

    Cembranos, A

    J.A. Cembranos, A. Dobado and A.L. Maroto,Cosmological and astrophysical limits on brane fluctuations,Physical Review D68(2003) 103505 [hep-ph/0307062]

    work page arXiv 2003

  60. [60]

    Facchinetti, M

    G. Facchinetti, M. Stref, T. Lacroix, J. Lavalle, J. Pérez-Romero, D. Maurin et al.,Analytical insight into dark matter subhalo boost factors for Sommerfeld-enhanced s- and p-waveγ-ray signals,JCAP2023(2023) 004 [2203.16491]

    work page arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Lacroix, G

    T. Lacroix, G. Facchinetti, J. Pérez-Romero, M. Stref, J. Lavalle, D. Maurin et al., Classification of gamma-ray targets for velocity-dependent and subhalo-boosted dark-matter annihilation,JCAP2022(2022) 021 [2203.16440]

    work page arXiv 2022

  62. [62]

    J.L. Feng, M. Kaplinghat and H.-B. Yu,Sommerfeld enhancements for thermal relic dark matter,Physical Review D82(2010) 083525 [1005.4678]

    work page arXiv 2010

  63. [63]

    Boudaud, T

    M. Boudaud, T. Lacroix, M. Stref and J. Lavalle,Robust cosmic-ray constraints on p -wave annihilating MeV dark matter,Physical Review D99(2019) 061302 [1810.01680]

    work page arXiv 2019

  64. [64]

    Abazajian and J.P

    K.N. Abazajian and J.P. Harding,Constraints on WIMP and Sommerfeld-Enhanced Dark Matter Annihilation from HESS Observations of the Galactic Center,JCAP01(2012) 041 [1110.6151]

    work page arXiv 2012

  65. [65]

    Slatyer, N

    T.R. Slatyer, N. Toro and N. Weiner,Sommerfeld-enhanced annihilation in dark matter substructure: Consequences for constraints on cosmic-ray excesses,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 083534 [1107.3546]

    work page arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    Lu, Y.-L

    B.-Q. Lu, Y.-L. Wu, W.-H. Zhang and Y.-F. Zhou,Constraints on the Sommerfeld-enhanced dark matter annihilation from the gamma rays of subhalos and dwarf galaxies,JCAP04(2018) 035 [1711.00749]

    work page arXiv 2018

  67. [67]

    Charles, M

    E. Charles, M. Sánchez-Conde, B. Anderson, R. Caputo, A. Cuoco, M. Di Mauro et al., Sensitivity projections for dark matter searches with the Fermi large area telescope,Phys. Rept. 636(2016) 1 [1605.02016]

    work page arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Howell, A.M.N

    J.M. Howell, A.M.N. Ferguson, S.S. Larsen, A. Lançon, F. Annibali, J.C. Cuillandre et al., Euclid: Early Release Observations – The star cluster systems of the Local Group dwarf galaxies IC 10 and NGC 6822,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2509.10440 [2509.10440]

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics

    G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross and O. Vitells,Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics,European Physical Journal C71(2011) 1554 [1007.1727]. – 46 –

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011