pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05366 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech · cond-mat.dis-nn· hep-th· nlin.PS

Recognition: unknown

Frustrated Fields: Statistical Field Theory for Frustrated Brownian Particles on 2D Manifolds

Igor Halperin

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 15:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.stat-mech cond-mat.dis-nnhep-thnlin.PS
keywords frustrated Brownian particlesstatistical field theorynonlinear sigma modelRP2adiabatic dimension reductionspin-glass dynamics2D manifoldsdirector orientation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Frustrated Brownian particles on a sphere reduce their low-energy dynamics to the nonlinear sigma model on RP².

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a statistical field theory for many Brownian particles with random quenched interactions on a compact 2D manifold. Simulations show the density collapses onto a slowly precessing great-circle ring whose orientation behaves as a director invariant under sign reversal. Conditioned on this ring saddle and a separation between slow orientation and gapped density modes, symmetry dictates that the effective theory is the (0+1)-dimensional nonlinear sigma model on the real projective plane RP², controlled by one parameter: the rotational diffusion coefficient. Measuring that coefficient and the static ring shape from the same simulations lets the model predict independent orientation and density observables without further adjustment.

Core claim

Conditioned on the ring saddle observed in particle simulations and a Born-Oppenheimer separation of timescales, the low-energy dynamics of the director orientation is fixed by symmetry to the nonlinear sigma model on RP² in (0+1) dimensions. This effective theory, governed solely by the rotational diffusion coefficient D_rot, reproduces multiple independent diagnostics in the orientation and density sectors once D_rot and the static ring profile f0 are taken from simulations.

What carries the argument

The nonlinear sigma model on the real projective plane RP², which encodes the slow director dynamics of the precessing density ring.

If this is right

  • Orientation correlation functions are predicted by diffusion on RP² using only the measured D_rot.
  • Density fluctuations stay gapped and track the static ring profile f0.
  • The same reduction applies to other compact 2D Riemannian manifolds that support an analogous ring saddle.
  • All reported orientation-sector and density-sector diagnostics match simulations with no additional free parameters.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adiabatic reduction might appear in other frustrated particle systems on curved surfaces, yielding projective-space effective models.
  • Varying manifold curvature or interaction range could provide a direct test of how the RP² description breaks down.
  • The approach offers a route to derive effective rotor models from microscopic spin-glass-like interactions in higher-dimensional or driven settings.

Load-bearing premise

The particle density remains concentrated on a stable ring saddle with a clear separation between slow orientation changes and fast gapped density fluctuations.

What would settle it

A long-time simulation in which the density ring dissolves or in which the orientation autocorrelation requires more than one fitted parameter would falsify the reduction to the single-constant RP² NLSM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05366 by Igor Halperin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Snapshot of an F2 simulation at t = 60 from a Big-Bang initial condition (N = 200, T = 0.4, σ = 1, V (d) = d, Gaussian quenched couplings). Left panel: particle positions on S 2 once the ring has formed, colored by per-particle potential energy Ei = P j ϕij d(xi , xj ) on the same blue-to-red rainbow used by the WebGL simulator. Right panel: the signed orientation nˆ(t), extracted as the smallest-eigenvalu… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Ensemble of 10 disorder realizations at N = 400, T = 0.4. (a) Distribution of Drot across realizations. (b) Orientation autocorrelation C(τ ) for each realization (colored) and the ensemble mean (black dashed). (c) Sample-to-sample variation of Drot (sorted). Quenched vs. disorder-averaged dynamics. Three different objects appear in the com￾parison and should be distinguished. The annealed Drot would be ex… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: N-scaling of Drot from particle simulations (T = 0.4, σ = 1, 3 disorder realizations per N). (a) Linear scale. (b) Log-log scale. The theoretical 1/N scaling (red dashed) and the power-law fit N −1.69 (green dotted) are shown. Drot decreases with N, but faster than the theoretical 1/N. The available data show a clear decrease of Drot with N, but do not yet determine the asymp￾totic exponent. A finite-range… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Ring-frame analysis from 41 snapshots (N = 400, T = 0.4). (a) Transversal density profile f0(θ) in the rotated frame, aggregated over all snapshots. The Gaussian fit (red) gives µ = 90.0 ◦ (equatorial), σ = 4.8 ◦ , FWHM = 11◦ . Nearly all particles (399/400) lie within the ring. (b) Distribution of longitudinal angular velocity ωϕ (velocity along the ring about nˆ): symmetric Gaussian with mean = 0.002 ± 0… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the effective SO(3) model SDE (red) with the particle simulation view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Memory kernel extraction from particle simulation ( view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Disorder-averaged density-density correlator on view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of three potential types: F2 model (blue, view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop a statistical field theory that describes the large-N limit of a system of Brownian particles with quenched random pairwise interactions on a compact two-dimensional Riemannian manifold. The resulting Frustrated Fields (F2) model is a non-linear field theory for a smooth self-interacting density field $\rho$ on the manifold, with local and non-local (in space and time) self-interactions characteristic of spin-glass dynamics. Particle simulations show \emph{adiabatic dimension reduction}: on $S^2$, the density concentrates on a slowly precessing great-circle ring whose orientation is a director ($\hat{\mathbf{n}} \sim -\hat{\mathbf{n}}$, even profile). Conditioned on this simulation-supported ring saddle and on a Born-Oppenheimer separation between the slow orientation and the gapped density fluctuations, symmetry fixes the low-energy dynamics to be the nonlinear sigma model (NLSM) on the real projective plane $S^2/\mathbb{Z}_2 = \mathbb{RP}^2$ (the $\mathbb{RP}^2$ NLSM on the projective rotor space) in $(0+1)$ dimensions, governed by a single low-energy constant, the rotational diffusion coefficient $D_{\text{rot}}$. With $D_{\text{rot}}$ and the static ring profile $f_0$ measured from particle simulations, the resulting effective theory reproduces multiple independent orientation- and density-sector diagnostics with no further adjustable parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper develops the Frustrated Fields (F2) statistical field theory for large-N Brownian particles with quenched random pairwise interactions on compact 2D Riemannian manifolds. Particle simulations on S^2 reveal adiabatic dimension reduction in which the density concentrates on a slowly precessing great-circle ring whose orientation behaves as a director (n̂ ∼ −n̂). Conditioned on this ring saddle and a Born-Oppenheimer separation between slow orientational dynamics and gapped density fluctuations, symmetry reduces the low-energy theory to the (0+1)D nonlinear sigma model on RP^2, controlled by a single constant D_rot. With D_rot and the static ring profile f0 extracted from the same simulations, the effective theory reproduces multiple independent orientation- and density-sector diagnostics without further adjustable parameters.

Significance. If the timescale separation is quantitatively validated, the work supplies a symmetry-protected effective description that converts microscopic frustration into a parameter-light rotor model on the projective plane, with direct predictive power for both orientational diffusion and density correlations once two quantities are measured from simulation. The explicit construction of the ring saddle and the reproduction of multiple diagnostics from measured D_rot and f0 constitute a concrete strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and the derivation of the low-energy theory: the Born-Oppenheimer separation between slow orientation and gapped density modes is invoked to eliminate all additional operators and fix the dynamics to the pure RP^2 NLSM, yet no numerical estimate of the gap (e.g., ratio of density-mode frequencies or decay rates to D_rot/R^2) is supplied. This separation is load-bearing for the central claim that the effective theory contains no further parameters or couplings.
  2. [Abstract] The reproduction of diagnostics: D_rot is extracted from the identical particle trajectories that later serve as the benchmark for the effective theory. While the paper correctly states that no further adjustable parameters are introduced after this measurement, the circular dependence means the match constitutes a consistency check rather than an independent test of the reduction; an external benchmark or parameter-free prediction would strengthen the claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the ring profile f0 and the director n̂ should be introduced with an explicit equation reference when first used in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the positive assessment of the significance of the Frustrated Fields (F2) model and the explicit ring-saddle construction. We address each major comment below, indicating the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and the derivation of the low-energy theory: the Born-Oppenheimer separation between slow orientation and gapped density modes is invoked to eliminate all additional operators and fix the dynamics to the pure RP^2 NLSM, yet no numerical estimate of the gap (e.g., ratio of density-mode frequencies or decay rates to D_rot/R^2) is supplied. This separation is load-bearing for the central claim that the effective theory contains no further parameters or couplings.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical estimate of the gap would strengthen the justification for the Born-Oppenheimer separation and the resulting claim of a parameter-free effective theory. The current manuscript relies on the observed adiabatic dimension reduction in simulations but does not report a quantitative ratio of density-mode relaxation rates to D_rot/R^2. In the revised manuscript we will add a quantitative analysis (in the main text or an appendix) that extracts the relevant density-fluctuation decay rates from the particle trajectories and computes the gap ratio. This addition will directly address the concern while leaving the central claims unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The reproduction of diagnostics: D_rot is extracted from the identical particle trajectories that later serve as the benchmark for the effective theory. While the paper correctly states that no further adjustable parameters are introduced after this measurement, the circular dependence means the match constitutes a consistency check rather than an independent test of the reduction; an external benchmark or parameter-free prediction would strengthen the claim.

    Authors: We acknowledge that measuring D_rot from the same trajectories used for subsequent benchmarking renders the agreement a consistency check rather than a fully independent test. The manuscript correctly notes that no additional parameters are introduced after extracting D_rot and f0, and that the RP^2 NLSM then accounts for multiple independent diagnostics. In revision we will explicitly rephrase the relevant passages to describe the agreement as a non-trivial consistency check of the symmetry-based reduction. While an external benchmark on a different manifold or parameter set would further strengthen the result, such an extension lies beyond the scope of the present work focused on S^2; we will note this limitation in the revised text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

D_rot and f0 measured from simulations are inserted into the effective theory to reproduce diagnostics from the same simulations

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "With D_rot and the static ring profile f0 measured from particle simulations, the resulting effective theory reproduces multiple independent orientation- and density-sector diagnostics with no further adjustable parameters."

    D_rot is extracted from the same particle simulations that later serve as the benchmark for the effective theory; the reproduction therefore depends on a quantity defined from the input data rather than a parameter-free derivation against external benchmarks.

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by running particle simulations to identify the ring saddle and to extract D_rot and f0, then conditioning the low-energy theory on those simulation outputs plus an assumed Born-Oppenheimer separation, and finally claiming that the resulting RP^2 NLSM reproduces multiple diagnostics from the identical simulations with no further parameters. This matches the fitted-input-called-prediction pattern: the quantitative match is achieved by construction once the measured constants are inserted. The symmetry argument fixing the form of the NLSM is independent of the data, but the load-bearing reproduction step reduces to the fitted inputs. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional equations are exhibited in the supplied text. The separation assumption is an unverified premise rather than a circular reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on two simulation-derived quantities and one timescale-separation assumption that are not independently derived from first principles within the paper.

free parameters (2)
  • D_rot
    Rotational diffusion coefficient extracted from particle simulations to set the scale of the effective theory.
  • f0
    Static ring profile measured from the same simulations and used as input for the effective model.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Born-Oppenheimer separation between slow orientation dynamics and gapped density fluctuations
    Invoked to justify fixing the low-energy dynamics solely by symmetry after conditioning on the ring saddle.
invented entities (1)
  • ring saddle independent evidence
    purpose: Stable concentration of the density field on a great-circle ring whose orientation acts as a director
    Postulated as the relevant saddle point supported by simulations; independent evidence is the simulation observation itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5572 in / 1520 out tokens · 58220 ms · 2026-05-08T15:54:51.961872+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Halperin

    I. Halperin. Order out of noise and disorder: Fate of the frustrated manifold.arXiv preprint, arXiv:2601.18653, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    M´ ezard, G

    M. M´ ezard, G. Parisi, and M. A. Virasoro.Spin Glass Theory and Beyond. World Scientific, 1987

    1987

  3. [3]

    Castellani and A

    T. Castellani and A. Cavagna. Spin-glass theory for pedestrians.Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2005(05):P05012, 2005. arXiv:cond-mat/0505032

    work page arXiv 2005

  4. [4]

    L. F. Cugliandolo and J. Kurchan, Analytical solution of the off-equilibrium dynamics of a long-range spin-glass model,Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 173–176 (1993)

    1993

  5. [5]

    Facoetti, G

    D. Facoetti, G. Biroli, J. Kurchan, and D. R. Reichman. Classical glasses, black holes, and strange quantum liquids.Physical Review E, 100(1):010102(R), 2019. arXiv:1906.09228

    work page arXiv 2019

  6. [6]

    P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Theory of dynamic critical phenomena, Rev. Mod. Phys.49, 435 (1977)

    1977

  7. [7]

    Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, Oxford University Press, 4th edition, 2002

    J. Zinn-Justin,Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena, Oxford University Press, 4th edition, 2002

    2002

  8. [8]

    Itˆ o, The Brownian motion and tensor fields on Riemannian manifold, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Stockholm, 1962, pp

    K. Itˆ o, The Brownian motion and tensor fields on Riemannian manifold, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, Stockholm, 1962, pp. 536–539. Institut Mittag-Leffler, Djursholm, 1963

    1962

  9. [9]

    Castro-Villarreal, A

    P. Castro-Villarreal, A. Villada-Balbuena, J. M. M´ endez-Alcaraz, R. Casta˜ neda-Priego, and S. Ram´ ırez-Hinestrosa, Colloid dynamics on curved surfaces,J. Chem. Phys.158, 214906 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    D. S. Dean. Langevin equation for the density of a system of interacting Langevin processes. Journal of Physics A, 29(24):L613, 1996

    1996

  11. [11]

    Illien, The Dean-Kawasaki equation and stochastic density functional theory, Rep

    P. Illien, The Dean-Kawasaki equation and stochastic density functional theory, Rep. Prog. Phys.(2025)

    2025

  12. [12]

    J. Bell, A. Djurdjevac, and N. Perkowski. Surface Dean-Kawasaki equations.arXiv preprint, arXiv:2601.06863, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    J. Jin, C. Liu, and D. R. Reichman,Field-Theoretic Simulation of Dean–Kawasaki Dy- namics for Interacting Particles, arXiv:2510.05042 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Y. Fily, A. Baskaran, and M. F. Hagan, Active particles on curved surfaces, Phys. Rev. E97, 012125 (2016). arXiv:1601.00324

    work page arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose. Statistical dynamics of classical systems. Physical Review A, 8(1):423, 1973

    1973

  16. [16]

    H. K. Janssen. On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties.Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B, 23(4):377–380, 1976

    1976

  17. [17]

    De Dominicis

    C. De Dominicis. Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques.Journal de Physique Colloques, 37(C1):C1-247, 1976

    1976

  18. [18]

    K. L. C. Hunt and J. Ross, Path integral solutions of stochastic equations for nonlinear irre- versible processes: The uniqueness of the thermodynamic Lagrangian,J. Chem. Phys.75, 976 (1981). 71

    1981

  19. [19]

    De Dominicis

    C. De Dominicis. Dynamics as a substitute for replicas in systems with quenched random impurities.Physical Review B, 18(9):4913–4919, 1978

    1978

  20. [20]

    Velenich, C

    A. Velenich, C. Chamon, L. F. Cugliandolo, and D. Kreimer, On the Brownian gas: a field theory with a Poissonian ground state,J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.41, 235002 (2008). arXiv:0802.3212

    work page arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    Gervais, J.-L., Jevicki, A., and Sakita, B. (1975). Perturbation expansion around extended- particle states in quantum field theory.Phys. Rev. D12, 1038

    1975

  22. [22]

    (1982).Solitons and Instantons

    Rajaraman, R. (1982).Solitons and Instantons. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    1982

  23. [23]

    (1985).Aspects of Symmetry

    Coleman, S. (1985).Aspects of Symmetry. Cambridge University Press

    1985

  24. [24]

    P., and Safko, J

    Goldstein, H., Poole, C. P., and Safko, J. L. (2001).Classical Mechanics(3rd ed.). Addison- Wesley

    2001

  25. [25]

    D., and Lifshitz, E

    Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. M. (1976).Mechanics(Vol. 1, 3rd ed.). Butterworth- Heinemann

    1976

  26. [26]

    F. D. M. Haldane. Nonlinear field theory of large-spin Heisenberg antiferromagnets: semi- classically quantized solitons of the one-dimensional easy-axis N´ eel state.Physical Review Letters, 50(15):1153, 1983

    1983

  27. [27]

    F. D. M. Haldane. Continuum dynamics of the 1-D Heisenberg antiferromagnet: identifi- cation with theRP 2 NLSM.Physics Letters A, 93(9):464–468, 1983

    1983

  28. [28]

    Berry, M. V. (1984). Quantal phase factors accompanying adiabatic changes.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 392(1802):45–57

    1984

  29. [29]

    and Mottelson, B

    Bohr, A. and Mottelson, B. R. (1975).Nuclear Structure, Vol. II: Nuclear Deformations. W. A. Benjamin

    1975

  30. [30]

    and Oppenheimer, R

    Born, M. and Oppenheimer, R. (1927). Zur Quantentheorie der Molekeln,Ann. Phys.389, 457–484

    1927

  31. [31]

    Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. (1977).Quantum Mechanics: Non-Relativistic Theory (3rd ed.). Pergamon Press

    1977

  32. [32]

    Skyrme, T. H. R. (1961). A non-linear field theory,Proc. Roy. Soc. A260, 127–138

    1961

  33. [33]

    S., Nappi, C

    Adkins, G. S., Nappi, C. R., and Witten, E. (1983). Static properties of nucleons in the Skyrme model,Nucl. Phys. B228, 552–566

    1983

  34. [34]

    and Panagopoulos, C

    Psaroudaki, C. and Panagopoulos, C. (2021). Skyrmion qubits: a new class of quantum logic elements based on nanoscale magnetization.Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 067201

    2021

  35. [35]

    Chaikin, P. M. and Lubensky, T. C. (1995).Principles of Condensed Matter Physics. Cam- bridge University Press

    1995

  36. [36]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem,Rep

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem,Rep. Prog. Phys.29, 255–284 (1966)

    1966

  37. [37]

    B., Weber, H

    Arfken, G. B., Weber, H. J., and Harris, F. E. (2013).Mathematical Methods for Physicists. Academic Press, 7th edition

    2013

  38. [38]

    Sompolinsky and A

    H. Sompolinsky and A. Zippelius. Dynamic theory of the spin-glass phase.Physical Review Letters, 47(5):359–362, 1981. 72

    1981

  39. [39]

    Bouchaud and A

    J.-P. Bouchaud and A. Georges. Anomalous diffusion in disordered media: statistical mech- anisms, models and physical applications.Physics Reports, 195(4-5):127–293, 1990

    1990

  40. [40]

    L. F. Cugliandolo, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, Energy flow, partial equilibration, and effective temperatures in systems with slow dynamics,Phys. Rev. E55, 3898–3914 (1997)

    1997

  41. [41]

    J. M. Caillol, Exact results for a two-dimensional one-component plasma on a sphere,J. Physique – Lettres42, L-245 (1981)

    1981

  42. [42]

    P. J. Forrester, B. Jancovici, and J. Madore, The two-dimensional Coulomb gas on a sphere: exact results,J. Stat. Phys.69, 179 (1992)

    1992

  43. [43]

    P., and de Falco, D

    Pennestri, E., Valentini, P. P., and de Falco, D. (2016). Dual Cayley-Klein parameters and M¨ obius transform: Theory and applications.Mechanism and Machine Theory106, 50–67

    2016

  44. [44]

    W. N. Cottingham and D. D. Doyle, The rotational dynamics of rigid bodies implemented with the Cayley Klein parametrization,Molecular Physics99(22), 1839–1843 (2001)

    2001

  45. [45]

    P. E. Lammert, D. S. Rokhsar, and J. Toner, Topology and nematic ordering. I. A gauge theory,Physical Review E52(2), 1778–1800 (1995)

    1995

  46. [46]

    P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost,The Physics of Liquid Crystals, 2nd ed., International Series of Monographs on Physics, Vol. 83 (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1993)

    1993

  47. [47]

    (2003).Geometry, Topology and Physics

    Nakahara, M. (2003).Geometry, Topology and Physics. Taylor & Francis, 2nd edition

    2003

  48. [48]

    N. D. Mermin, The topological theory of defects in ordered media,Reviews of Modern Physics51(3), 591–648 (1979)

    1979

  49. [49]

    Halperin

    I. Halperin. Frustrated dynamics of distance matrices.In preparation, 2026

    2026

  50. [50]

    Kawasaki, Stochastic model of slow dynamics in supercooled liquids and dense colloidal suspensions,Physica A208, 35 (1994)

    K. Kawasaki, Stochastic model of slow dynamics in supercooled liquids and dense colloidal suspensions,Physica A208, 35 (1994)

    1994

  51. [51]

    A. J. Archer and M. Rauscher, Dynamical density functional theory for interacting Brow- nian particles: stochastic or deterministic?,J. Phys. A37, 9325 (2004)

    2004

  52. [52]

    P. Illien. Nonequilibrium field theory for disordered systems.arXiv preprint, arXiv:2411.13467, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  53. [53]

    Le Bon, A

    L. Le Bon, A. Carof, and P. Illien, Non-Gaussian density fluctuations in the Dean-Kawasaki equation, arXiv:2501.16206 [cond-mat.stat-mech] (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Konarovskyi, T

    V. Konarovskyi, T. Lehmann, and M. K. von Renesse, Dean–Kawasaki dynamics: ill- posedness vs. triviality,Electron. Commun. Probab.24, 1 (2019)

    2019

  55. [55]

    Sompolinsky and A

    H. Sompolinsky and A. Zippelius. Relaxational dynamics of the Edwards-Anderson model and the mean-field theory of spin-glasses.Physical Review B, 25(11):6860–6875, 1982

    1982

  56. [56]

    J. A. Hertz, Y. Roudi, and P. Sollich. Path integral methods for the dynamics of stochastic and disordered systems.Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 50(3):033001,

  57. [57]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas. Random magnetic fields, supersymmetry, and negative dimen- sions.Physical Review Letters, 43(11):744, 1979

    1979

  58. [58]

    Parisi and N

    G. Parisi and N. Sourlas. Supersymmetric field theories and stochastic differential equa- tions.Nuclear Physics B, 206(2):321–332, 1982. 73

    1982

  59. [59]

    M. V. Feigel’man and A. M. Tsvelik. Hidden supersymmetry of stochastic dissipative dy- namics.Soviet Physics JETP, 56(4):823–827, 1982

    1982

  60. [60]

    Gozzi, Onsager principle of microscopic reversibility and supersymmetry,Phys

    E. Gozzi, Onsager principle of microscopic reversibility and supersymmetry,Phys. Rev. D 30, 1218 (1984)

    1984

  61. [61]

    J. Kurchan. Supersymmetry in spin glass dynamics.Journal de Physique I, 2(7):1333–1352, 1992

    1992

  62. [62]

    E. Witten. Dynamical breaking of supersymmetry.Nuclear Physics B, 188(3):513–554, 1981

    1981

  63. [63]

    E. Witten. Supersymmetry and Morse theory.Journal of Differential Geometry, 17(4):661– 692, 1982

    1982

  64. [64]

    B. Kim, K. Kawasaki, H. Jacquin, and F. van Wijland, Equilibrium dynamics of the Dean- Kawasaki equation: Mode-coupling theory and its extension,Phys. Rev. E89, 012150 (2014). 74

    2014