pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05412 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.SR

Recognition: unknown

A Dual-Band Centimetre Continuum Monitoring Survey of Young Stellar Objects in the Coronet Cluster

Arpan Ghosh, Carlos Carrasco-Gonz\'alez, Carlos G Rom\'an-Zu\~niga, Hauyu Baobab Liu, Jan Forbrich, Johanan Ram\'irez-Arellano, Roberto Galv\'an-Madrid, Yenifer Angarita

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 15:46 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.SR
keywords Young Stellar ObjectsRadio ContinuumSpectral IndexCoronet ClusterFree-Free EmissionVariabilityStar Formation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dual-band radio monitoring shows younger YSOs have broader spectral indices than evolved Class II objects.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The survey uses repeated VLA observations at 9 and 14 GHz to track radio emission from young stellar objects in the nearby Coronet Cluster. Younger Class 0 and I sources display spectral indices spanning -0.4 to 1.7, pointing to mixed emission processes, while Class II sources stay between 0 and 0.8, matching thermal free-free emission from ionized winds. Radio variability appears in nearly all detected sources regardless of evolutionary stage, and structure functions show no single dominant timescale. These patterns help separate thermal from possible non-thermal contributions at centimetre wavelengths during early star formation.

Core claim

The paper establishes that peak spectral indices distinguish evolutionary classes: Class 0 and I YSOs range from -0.4 to 1.7 while Class II YSOs remain flatter between 0 and 0.8, consistent with free-free emission plus minor non-thermal contributions, and that variability is ubiquitous across stages.

What carries the argument

Spectral index α_pk computed from peak intensities at 9 GHz and 14 GHz, combined with multi-epoch monitoring to track intensity changes over years.

If this is right

  • Spectral index ranges can serve as an evolutionary diagnostic for embedded YSOs when infrared data are ambiguous.
  • Free-free emission dominates in Class II objects while younger stages allow additional non-thermal contributions.
  • Ubiquitous variability without preferred timescales implies ongoing activity in winds or outflows at all stages.
  • Some extended components around sources like IRS 7B show negative indices, indicating localized non-thermal processes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar dual-band monitoring in other nearby clusters could test whether the same index separation holds beyond the Coronet.
  • Higher-resolution follow-up might resolve whether the wider index range in young sources arises from multiple unresolved components.
  • The lack of timescale preference in variability suggests that single-epoch radio surveys may miss or misclassify sources.

Load-bearing premise

That prior infrared data correctly assign evolutionary classes to each radio source and that the measured indices reflect the dominant emission mechanism without major unresolved blends or calibration offsets.

What would settle it

Detection of a securely classified Class II YSO with α_pk outside 0-0.8 across multiple epochs, or a Class 0/I source with α_pk locked between 0 and 0.8 without detectable non-thermal signatures.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05412 by Arpan Ghosh, Carlos Carrasco-Gonz\'alez, Carlos G Rom\'an-Zu\~niga, Hauyu Baobab Liu, Jan Forbrich, Johanan Ram\'irez-Arellano, Roberto Galv\'an-Madrid, Yenifer Angarita.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Deep continuum maps of the Coronet cluster at: (a) 9.0 GHz (3.3 cm), (b) 14.0 GHz (2.1 cm); imaged with Briggs weighting (robust = 0). Maps are shown prior to primary beam correction. The synthesized beam size for the 9 GHz map is 1 ′′ .84 × 0 ′′ .78, PA = 4.24◦ with an rms noise of ∼ 9 𝜇Jy beam−1 , while for the 14 GHz map it is 0 ′′ .59 × 0 ′′ .25, PA = 7.71◦ , with an rms noise of ∼ 8 𝜇Jy beam−1 . The 9… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Zoom-in of the deep continuum map of the Coronet at 9.0 GHz (3.3 cm), imaged with Briggs weighting (robust = -0.5). The synthesized beam size is 1 ′′ .23 × 0 ′′ .55, PA = 4.21◦ , with an rms noise of ∼ 13 𝜇Jy beam−1 prior to primary beam correction. in FPM10 is consistent with zero. The interpretation of these is dis￾cussed in the following sections. Although the noise levels of the original maps in the tw… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Peak spectral index (𝛼pk) as a function of the evolutionary stage (younger YSOs to the left). The upper panel orders the sources according to their bolometric temperature 𝑇bol , while the lower panel orders them by the colour index 𝐾𝑠 − [8.0]. The dashed lines indicate the optically thick and optically thin limits to free-free emission, respectively. IRS 7A, and IRS 7B are shown in Fig. 4b. All sources exh… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variability index as a function of the evolutionary stage, for the YSOs (a, without) and (b, with) consideration of their subcomponents. The dashed lines indicate the variability threshold 𝑉 𝐼 = 1. The upper panels cor￾respond to variability in the X-band, while the lower panels shows variability in the Ku-band. in the Ku-band ( view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Peak intensity box plots in both bands, ordered as in view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Percentage variability box plots. Symbols and labels are defined as in view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Structure functions for a subset of YSOs over a time span of approximately 1100 d. The sources are ordered by evolutionary stage, from younger to more evolved. Vertical lines indicate the time-lag bins of [0.1, 1, 3, 10, 30, 100, 300, 1000] d. The error bars correspond to the standard deviation of the measurements within each bin. Rigliaco et al. 2019). The spectral indices of this object are consistent wi… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Time variability of the peak spectral index. Symbol sizes indicate the resolution group. The horizontal dashed lines represent the optically thick (upper) and optically thin (lower) free–free emission limits. The x-axis location of the diamond symbols denote the epoch of the Ku-band detections, while the horizontal error bars indicate the time intervals during which X-band detections were obtained and 𝛼pk … view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: YSOs in the Coronet cluster within our field of view, previously detected by Peterson et al. (2011) (× symbols), Esplin & Luhman (2022) (crosses), and Hsieh et al. (2024) (open circles). 4.3.3 IRS 7B IRS 7E is resolved as a multiple system at centimetre wavelengths (see Fig. 10c). It is composed of IRS 7Ba, IRS 7Bb and a northern source that we designate IRS 7BN. These components are embed￾ded within an ex… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Zoom-in of the map generated with natural weighting, prior to the primary beam correction, showing the extended emission toward the source IRS7E. The synthesized beam size is 3 ′′ .19 × 2 ′′ .18 with an rms of ∼ 7𝜇Jy beam−1 . is detected only in the deep X-band map. It is likely a non-thermal shock launched by one of the components of IRS 7A, as its spectral index, 𝛼pk < −0.8, is consistent with non-therm… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10 view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FPM13 light curve: The top panel show the peak intensity at each epoch, while the bottom panel show the percentage variability of the detections. The symbol sizes indicate the five resolution groups; circles cor￾respond to measurements in the X-band and squares to those in the Ku-band. Dashed lines, in top panel, indicate the mean intensity in each band. In the top panel, the shaded regions span ± one sta… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present sensitive ($\sim$9 $\mu$Jy), sub-arcsecond resolution radio continuum observations at 9.0 GHz (3.3 cm) and 14.0 GHz (2.1 cm) obtained with the Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array (VLA) toward the nearby Coronet Cluster in Corona Australis (d $\approx$ 150 pc). We monitored the region from March 2012 to February 2015 using all available VLA configurations, allowing us to construct deep X- and Ku-band maps at multiple angular resolutions. We detected 20 radio sources, including 14 previously known Young Stellar Objects (YSOs), five sources possibly associated with shock emission, and one background galaxy. We resolved IRS 5, previously known to be a binary system, and identified IRS 7A and IRS 7B as multiple systems at centimetre wavelengths. The younger Class 0 and I YSOs exhibit spectral indices $\alpha_{pk}$ ranging from -0.4 to 1.7, while the more evolved Class II YSOs show flatter values between 0 and 0.8, consistent with free-free emission, with minor contributions from non-thermal emission. The Class III source is only constrained by an upper limit. Radio variability, measured as a fraction of the mean intensity peak, is found to be ubiquitous and independent of evolutionary stage. Variability structure functions computed for nine sources indicate no preferred timescales for most of them. We also investigate spectral index variability for six sources and find significant variations in only one object. Finally, we analyse the extended radio emission toward IRS 7B, where some subcomponents exhibit negative spectral indices suggestive of non-thermal processes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. This paper reports sensitive dual-band VLA monitoring observations at 9 GHz and 14 GHz of the Coronet Cluster, detecting 20 radio sources (14 associated with YSOs). It finds that younger Class 0/I YSOs exhibit peak spectral indices α_pk from -0.4 to 1.7 while more evolved Class II sources show flatter values (0 to 0.8) consistent with free-free emission, with radio variability ubiquitous and independent of evolutionary stage, structure functions indicating no preferred timescales for most sources, and some subcomponents of IRS 7B showing negative indices suggestive of non-thermal emission.

Significance. If the spectral-index differences prove robust, the work supplies useful empirical constraints on how radio emission mechanisms evolve with YSO stage in a nearby cluster, complementing infrared classifications. The multi-configuration monitoring strategy is a clear strength, enabling both deep sensitivity and time-domain analysis.

major comments (1)
  1. [Results section describing spectral-index computation] The central claim that α_pk ranges distinguish Class 0/I from Class II sources rests on peak-flux ratios. The abstract notes that all VLA configurations were used to build multi-resolution maps, yet the text does not specify whether images were convolved to identical resolution or restricted to common uv-coverage before extracting peaks. For resolved or extended sources such as IRS 7B and its subcomponents, this omission could systematically offset the reported indices and undermine the evolutionary-stage interpretation.
minor comments (2)
  1. The criteria used to associate the five shock-emission candidates and to confirm the 14 YSOs with prior infrared classifications should be stated explicitly, including positional matching tolerances and any deblending procedures.
  2. The variability structure functions are computed for nine sources; a brief description of the exact definition, binning, and handling of non-detections would improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its significance. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarification.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Results section describing spectral-index computation] The central claim that α_pk ranges distinguish Class 0/I from Class II sources rests on peak-flux ratios. The abstract notes that all VLA configurations were used to build multi-resolution maps, yet the text does not specify whether images were convolved to identical resolution or restricted to common uv-coverage before extracting peaks. For resolved or extended sources such as IRS 7B and its subcomponents, this omission could systematically offset the reported indices and undermine the evolutionary-stage interpretation.

    Authors: We agree that the description of the spectral-index computation is incomplete and could lead to questions about possible resolution-induced biases. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit statement in the Results section that peak fluxes for α_pk were measured on maps constructed from the subset of VLA configurations that provide overlapping uv-coverage at both frequencies and that were convolved to a common synthesized beam (∼1″) before peak extraction. For the extended source IRS 7B we already analysed its subcomponents separately in the highest-resolution data; we will expand that discussion to note that the negative indices reported for some subcomponents are measured at the native resolution of the A-array data and are therefore not subject to the same convolution. The compact sources that dominate the Class 0/I versus Class II comparison remain unaffected by these choices, so the reported range differences are robust. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational survey with direct measurements only

full rationale

This paper presents VLA radio continuum observations at two frequencies, reports direct detections of 20 sources, computes spectral indices α_pk from measured peak fluxes, and tabulates variability metrics. No derivations, fitted parameters, model predictions, or equations appear in the abstract or described content. Evolutionary classifications are taken from prior external infrared catalogs, and the reported α_pk ranges are empirical observations rather than outputs of any internal chain. No self-citations are invoked to justify uniqueness theorems or ansatzes that would reduce the central claims to the paper's own inputs. The work is self-contained as a data report against standard radio-astronomy benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Observational survey paper. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work relies on standard radio-astronomy techniques and prior classifications of YSO evolutionary stages from the literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5672 in / 1139 out tokens · 36093 ms · 2026-05-08T15:46:22.682068+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 62 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    E., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..363A 154, 363

    Allen L. E., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422715 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154..363A 154, 363

    work page doi:10.1086/422715 2004

  2. [2]

    Andre P., Ward-Thompson D., Barsony M., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/172425 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...406..122A 406, 122

    work page doi:10.1086/172425 1993

  3. [3]

    T., Rodr \' guez L

    Anglada G., Villuendas E., Estalella R., Beltr \'a n M. T., Rodr \' guez L. F., Torrelles J. M., Curiel S., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/300637 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998AJ....116.2953A 116, 2953

    work page doi:10.1086/300637 1998

  4. [4]

    Anglada Rodr \' guez Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-018-0107-z , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&ARv..26....3A 26, 3

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-018-0107-z 2018

  5. [5]

    Astropy Collaboration et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A 156, 123

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f 2018

  6. [6]

    CASA Team et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022PASP..134k4501C 134, 114501

    work page doi:10.1088/1538-3873/ac9642 2022

  7. [7]

    arXiv , author =:2106.01235 , journal =

    Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez C., Sanna A., Rodr \' guez-Kamenetzky A., Moscadelli L., Hoare M., Torrelles J. M., Galv \'a n-Madrid R., Izquierdo A. F., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/abf735 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...914L...1C 914, L1

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/abf735 2021

  8. [8]

    Cazzoletti P., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201935273 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...626A..11C 626, A11

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935273 2019

  9. [9]

    Choi M., Hamaguchi K., Lee J.-E., Tatematsu K., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/591540 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...687..406C 687, 406

    work page doi:10.1086/591540 2008

  10. [10]

    Comrie A., et al., 2026, CARTA: The Cube Analysis and Rendering Tool for Astronomy, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.18477253 , https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18477253

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.18477253 2026

  11. [11]

    T., Forbrich J., Loinard L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552A..51D 552, A51

    Deller A. T., Forbrich J., Loinard L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...552A..51D 552, A51

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321085 2013

  12. [12]

    D \' az-M \'a rquez E., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348085 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.180D 682, A180

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348085 2024

  13. [13]

    M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...11D 220, 11

    Dunham M. M., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...11D 220, 11

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/11 2015

  14. [14]

    A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775...63D 775, 63

    Dzib S. A., et al., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/775/1/63 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...775...63D 775, 63

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/775/1/63 2013

  15. [15]

    Esplin T., Luhman K., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3e64 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022AJ....163...64E 163, 64

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac3e64 2022

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 , eprint =

    Evans Neal J. I., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ApJS..181..321E 181, 321

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/181/2/321 2009

  17. [17]

    G., Hora, J

    Fazio G. G., et al., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422843 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJS..154...10F 154, 10

    work page doi:10.1086/422843 2004

  18. [18]

    D., Carkner L., Wilking B

    Feigelson E. D., Carkner L., Wilking B. A., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/311190 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...494L.215F 494, L215

    work page doi:10.1086/311190 1998

  19. [19]

    Forbrich J., Preibisch T., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066342 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...475..959F 475, 959

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066342 2007

  20. [20]

    M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052871 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...446..155F 446, 155

    Forbrich J., Preibisch T., Menten K. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052871 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...446..155F 446, 155

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20052871 2006

  21. [21]

    Forbrich J., et al., 2007a, @doi [ Astronomy & Astrophysics - A&A ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066158 , 464, 1003

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20066158

  22. [22]

    M., 2007b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469..985F 469, 985

    Forbrich J., Massi M., Ros E., Brunthaler A., Menten K. M., 2007b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077113 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469..985F 469, 985

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20077113

  23. [23]

    Protostars and Planets VI , year = 2014, editor =

    Frank A., et al., 2014, in Beuther H., Klessen R. S., Dullemond C. P., Henning T., eds, Protostars and Planets VI. pp 451--474 ( @eprint arXiv 1402.3553 ), @doi 10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch020

    work page doi:10.2458/azu_uapress_9780816531240-ch020 2014

  24. [24]

    Galli P. A. B., Bouy H., Olivares J., Miret-Roig N., Sarro L. M., Barrado D., Berihuete A., Brandner W., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...634A..98G 634, A98

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936708 2020

  25. [25]

    Galv \'a n-Madrid R., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424630 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...570L...9G 570, L9

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424630 2014

  26. [26]

    Garufi A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202452496 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...694A.290G 694, A290

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452496 2025

  27. [27]

    Ghosh A., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stag154 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026MNRAS.tmp..156G

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag154 2026

  28. [28]

    E., Kulesa C., Walker C., Martin C

    Groppi C. E., Kulesa C., Walker C., Martin C. L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/422168 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ApJ...612..946G 612, 946

    work page doi:10.1086/422168 2004

  29. [29]

    G \"u del M., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ARA&A..40..217G 40, 217

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093806 2002

  30. [30]

    F., Petre R., White N

    Hamaguchi K., Corcoran M. F., Petre R., White N. E., Stelzer B., Nedachi K., Kobayashi N., Tokunaga A. T., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1086/428434 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ApJ...623..291H 623, 291

    work page doi:10.1086/428434 2005

  31. [31]

    Hartmann L., Herczeg G., Calvet N., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ARA&A..54..135H 54, 135

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023347 2016

  32. [32]

    Hern \'a ndez J., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522882 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...671.1784H 671, 1784

    work page doi:10.1086/522882 2007

  33. [33]

    G., Maureira M

    Hsieh C.-H., Arce H. G., Maureira M. J., Pineda J. E., Segura-Cox D., Mardones D., Dunham M. M., Arun A., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6152 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...973..138H 973, 138

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6152 2024

  34. [34]

    J., 1987, in Peimbert M., Jugaku J., eds, IAU Symposium Vol

    Lada C. J., 1987, in Peimbert M., Jugaku J., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 115, Star Forming Regions. p. 1

    1987

  35. [35]

    B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780..155L 780, 155

    Liu H. B., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/780/2/155 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...780..155L 780, 155

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/780/2/155 2014

  36. [36]

    Mac \' as E., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...829....1M 829, 1

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/829/1/1 2016

  37. [37]

    F., Ansdell M., Rosotti G

    Manara C. F., Ansdell M., Rosotti G. P., Hughes A. M., Armitage P. J., Lodato G., Williams J. P., 2023, in Inutsuka S., Aikawa Y., Muto T., Tomida K., Tamura M., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII. p. 539 ( @eprint arXiv 2203.09930 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09930

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09930 2023

  38. [38]

    J., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202556063 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...705A..96M 705, A96

    Maureira M. J., et al., 2026, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202556063 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2026A&A...705A..96M 705, A96

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556063 2026

  39. [39]

    L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...486..799M 486, 799

    Miettinen O., Kontinen S., Harju J., Higdon J. L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200809348 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008A&A...486..799M 486, 799

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809348 2008

  40. [40]

    Moscadelli L., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201526238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A&A...585A..71M 585, A71

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201526238 2016

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Myers P. C., Ladd E. F., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186956 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...413L..47M 413, L47

    work page doi:10.1086/186956 1993

  42. [42]

    5, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume II

    Neuh \"a user R., Forbrich J., 2008, in Reipurth B., ed., , Vol. 5, Handbook of Star Forming Regions, Volume II. p. 735, @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0808.3374

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.0808.3374 2008

  43. [43]

    Nisini B., Antoniucci S., Giannini T., Lorenzetti D., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20041409 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...429..543N 429, 543

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041409 2005

  44. [44]

    N., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805....9O 805, 9

    Ortiz-Le \'o n G. N., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/9 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...805....9O 805, 9

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/9 2015

  45. [45]

    Pascucci I., Gorti U., Hollenbach D., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/L42 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...751L..42P 751, L42

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/751/2/l42 2012

  46. [46]

    P., Brooks K

    Pascucci I., Ricci L., Gorti U., Hollenbach D., Hendler N. P., Brooks K. J., Contreras Y., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...795....1P 795, 1

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/1 2014

  47. [47]

    Pattle K., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staf009 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.537.2127P 537, 2127

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf009 2025

  48. [48]

    E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/43 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...43P 194, 43

    Peterson D. E., et al., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/43 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJS..194...43P 194, 43

    work page doi:10.1088/0067-0049/194/2/43 2011

  49. [49]

    B., Lonsdale C

    Phillips R. B., Lonsdale C. J., Feigelson E. D., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1086/186717 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993ApJ...403L..43P 403, L43

    work page doi:10.1086/186717 1993

  50. [50]

    P., Muxlow T

    Ray T. P., Muxlow T. W. B., Axon D. J., Brown A., Corcoran D., Dyson J., Mundt R., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1038/385415a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997Natur.385..415R 385, 415

    work page doi:10.1038/385415a0 1997

  51. [51]

    Ray T., Dougados C., Bacciotti F., Eisl \"o ffel J., Chrysostomou A., 2007, in Reipurth B., Jewitt D., Keil K., eds, Protostars and Planets V. p. 231 ( @eprint arXiv astro-ph/0605597 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0605597

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0605597 2007

  52. [52]

    Rigliaco E., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201936707 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...632A..18R 632, A18

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936707 2019

  53. [53]

    M., Anglada G., Mart \' J., Rodr \' guez L

    Rodr \' guez-Kamenetzky A., Carrasco-Gonz \'a lez C., Araudo A., Torrelles J. M., Anglada G., Mart \' J., Rodr \' guez L. F., Valotto C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0004-637X/818/1/27 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016ApJ...818...27R 818, 27

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/818/1/27 2016

  54. [54]

    R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6fd1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931L..26R 931, L26

    Rodr \' guez-Kamenetzky A. R., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.3847/2041-8213/ac6fd1 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931L..26R 931, L26

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac6fd1 2022

  55. [55]

    F., Zapata L

    Rodr \' guez L. F., Zapata L. A., Dzib S. A., Ortiz-Le \'o n G. N., Loinard L., Mac \' as E., Anglada G., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/793/1/L21 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...793L..21R 793, L21

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/793/1/l21 2014

  56. [56]

    A., Meijerhof J

    Rota A. A., Meijerhof J. D., van der Marel N., Francis L., van der Tak F. F. S., Sellek A. D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202348387 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.134R 684, A134

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348387 2024

  57. [57]

    A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...700A..32R 700, A32

    Rota A. A., et al., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202554259 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...700A..32R 700, A32

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202554259 2025

  58. [58]

    Sabatini G., et al., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202449616 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684L..12S 684, L12

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449616 2024

  59. [59]

    D., Bajaj N

    Sandell G., Reipurth B., Vacca W. D., Bajaj N. S., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ac133d , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...920....7S 920, 7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac133d 2021

  60. [60]

    J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...551A..34S 551, A34

    Sicilia-Aguilar A., Henning T., Linz H., Andr \'e P., Stutz A., Eiroa C., White G. J., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201220170 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...551A..34S 551, A34

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201220170 2013

  61. [61]

    F., Cutri , R

    Skrutskie M. F., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006AJ....131.1163S 131, 1163

    work page doi:10.1086/498708 2006

  62. [62]

    S., Lada C

    Teixeira P. S., Lada C. J., Marengo M., Lada E. A., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015326 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...540A..83T 540, A83

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015326 2012

  63. [63]

    , keywords =

    Tobin J. J., Sheehan P. D., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-103752 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ARA&A..62..203T 62, 203

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-103752 2024