arxiv: 2605.06411 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-07 · ⚛️ physics.soc-ph · econ.GN· q-fin.EC

Recognition: unknown

Cascading disruptions in natural gas, fertilizers, and crops drive structural food supply vulnerabilities globally

Pavel Kiparisov , Christian Folberth

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 04:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.soc-ph econ.GNq-fin.EC

keywords food securitysupply chain disruptionsnatural gasmineral fertilizerscascading impactsglobal trade networkscaloric consumptionstructural vulnerability

0 comments

The pith

Complete trade isolation in gas, fertilizers, and crops could eliminate up to 22% of global caloric consumption.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a model linking international trade in natural gas, nitrogen phosphorus and potassium fertilizers, and eleven staple crops that together supply about 70% of plant-based calories. It applies this model to 208 countries over the period 1992-2023 and calculates the caloric shortfall that would result if all cross-border trade ceased. The results show losses reaching 22% at their highest point in recent years, with extreme regional differences: some areas would lose nearly their entire crop supply because they lack domestic segments of the chain, while very few countries hold enough local resources to maintain the full sequence. Vulnerability has grown over the decades, market power sits most concentrated in the upstream gas and fertilizer stages, and existing food stocks buffer only a small fraction of the population against shortfalls.

Core claim

The central claim is that structural vulnerabilities in the global agrifood system arise from tightly coupled dependencies on natural gas, mineral fertilizers, and staple crops. Under a scenario of complete trade isolation, caloric losses reach 22% globally at peak, with near-total collapse in regions missing supply chain segments. Market power is concentrated upstream, shocks propagate downstream, and stocks provide limited resilience as half the world's population has less than three months of reserves. Temporal trends indicate rising vulnerability since the 1990s.

What carries the argument

A cascading-impact model that integrates bilateral trade data for natural gas, NPK fertilizers, and eleven staple crops representing 70% of plant-based calories across 208 countries and 20 geopolitical blocs from 1992 to 2023.

If this is right

Regions lacking domestic gas or fertilizer production face near-total crop supply collapse under isolation.
Only a small number of countries can sustain the entire gas-fertilizer-crop nexus through local resources alone.
Global vulnerability has risen substantially, with a near two-fold increase in the EU since the 1990s.
Upstream gas and mineral-fertilizer layers concentrate market power and volatility that drives downstream food shocks.
Food stocks last less than three months in countries housing half the global population, limiting short-term resilience.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Interventions that diversify or localize upstream gas and fertilizer supplies would address the primary origin points of cascading shocks.
The documented rise in vulnerability over three decades indicates that continued reliance on international trade without added buffers increases future exposure.
Targeted stock increases or alternative sourcing agreements for the gas-to-crop chain could raise the share of the population protected beyond three months.

Load-bearing premise

The model treats complete trade isolation as a meaningful proxy for real disruptions and assumes bilateral trade data plus domestic production capacities fully capture the relevant supply linkages without major gaps or unmodeled substitutions.

What would settle it

Measurement of actual global caloric intake reductions during a real-world event that produces near-complete isolation of trade in natural gas, fertilizers, or crops, compared against the model's predicted 22% peak loss.

read the original abstract

Global food security depends on tightly coupled international supply chains including natural gas, mineral fertilizers, and staple crops. Earlier research has examined potential consequences of disruptions in each of these domains separately but not from a systemic perspective. Here we integrate bilateral trade in natural gas, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizers, and eleven staple crops accounting for approximately 70% of plant-based calories into a cascading-impact model spanning 208 countries, 20 geopolitical blocs, and the period 1992-2023. Under complete trade isolation, up to 22% of global caloric consumption would be lost, with a peak in the most recent evaluated years. Structural vulnerabilities vary greatly. Regions largely lacking some parts of the supply chain face near-total crop supply collapse, while few countries can cover the whole nexus through domestic resource endowments and production capacities. Temporal trends highlight a substantial increase in vulnerability globally, most prominently in the EU with a near two-fold increase since the 1990s. Market power is most concentrated and most volatile in the upstream gas and mineral-fertilizer layers, from which shocks propagate downstream. Food stocks provide only limited resilience with half of humanity living in countries disposing of stock lasting less than three months. Our results identify the upstream supply chains as the structural bottlenecks of the global agrifood system and propose leverage points to enhance resilience.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper links gas, fertilizer, and crop trade into one cascade model across 208 countries and shows up to 22% global caloric loss under full isolation, which is a useful stress-test bound even if real disruptions allow more adaptation.

read the letter

This paper builds a cascading model that connects natural gas trade, nitrogen-phosphorus-potassium fertilizers, and eleven staple crops into a single framework covering 208 countries from 1992 to 2023. The main result is that complete trade isolation could remove up to 22% of global plant-based calories, with the largest effects in the later years and in places that lack domestic capacity in any part of the chain. Regions missing upstream links face near-total crop shortfalls while only a few countries cover the whole sequence internally. The work also tracks rising vulnerability over time, especially a near doubling in the EU, and notes that stocks buffer less than three months for half the world's population. Market concentration is highest and most variable in the gas and fertilizer layers, from which losses flow downstream. These are the concrete outputs that stand out. The integration itself is new relative to earlier separate studies on each domain, and the use of standard bilateral trade data from Comtrade, FAO, and IFA sources keeps the numbers traceable. The temporal and regional breakdowns give a practical map of where the tightest links sit. The soft spot is the deterministic propagation with no substitution elasticities or rerouting once trade stops. This is presented as a deliberate worst-case design rather than a prediction, so the 22% figure functions as an upper bound. Still, the results would be more robust with explicit sensitivity tests on domestic production assumptions and at least a check against one historical shock, such as the 2022 fertilizer price spike. Without those, the quantitative claims remain somewhat provisional even though the data handling looks clean and non-circular. This is for analysts and modelers who work on food-system resilience, trade policy, or supply-chain risk. It supplies a workable way to trace interdependencies and flag leverage points without overclaiming foresight. I would send it to peer review. The multi-layer structure is worth referee time to tighten validation and explore how much the no-adaptation rule shifts the headline numbers.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper integrates bilateral trade data on natural gas, N/P/K fertilizers, and 11 staple crops (covering ~70% of plant-based calories) into a deterministic cascading input-output model across 208 countries and 20 geopolitical blocs for 1992-2023. It reports that complete trade isolation produces up to 22% global caloric loss (peaking in recent years), with strong regional heterogeneity, increasing temporal vulnerability (especially in the EU), upstream market-power concentration, and limited buffering from food stocks.

Significance. If the central estimates hold, the work supplies a systemic, multi-layer view of agrifood supply-chain vulnerabilities that earlier single-domain studies lacked. Credit is due for the use of standard public data sources (UN Comtrade, FAO, IFA), the explicit framing of the model as a deliberate stress-test without substitution elasticities, and the temporal analysis that documents rising exposure. These elements make the headline 22% figure and the identification of upstream bottlenecks directly traceable and policy-relevant.

minor comments (3)

[Methods] Methods section: the description of the cascade propagation (bilateral flows plus domestic capacities, no re-routing) is clear but would benefit from an explicit statement of the exact matrix-multiplication or iterative algorithm used, together with a small numerical example for one country-commodity pair.
[Results] Results, temporal trends paragraph: the reported near-two-fold EU increase since the 1990s is striking; adding a supplementary table or panel showing the year-by-year caloric-loss series for the EU and a few other blocs would allow readers to verify the trend without re-running the model.
[Figures & Results] Figure captions and text: several statements refer to 'structural vulnerabilities' and 'market power concentration' without cross-referencing the exact panels or supplementary tables that quantify these quantities (e.g., Herfindahl indices or eigenvector centrality).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of its scope and methods, and the recommendation for minor revision. We are pleased that the systemic integration of natural gas, fertilizer, and crop trade layers, the temporal analysis, and the policy relevance of the 22% caloric loss estimate are recognized as strengths.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The derivation relies on external bilateral trade and production statistics (UN Comtrade, FAO, IFA) fed into a deterministic input-output cascade that computes caloric losses under full isolation. The 22% global loss figure and regional vulnerabilities emerge directly from propagating observed flows and capacities through the network; no parameters are fitted to the headline outcomes, no self-definitional loops exist in the equations, and no load-bearing self-citations or uniqueness theorems are invoked. The model is a deliberate stress-test simulation whose results are independent of the claims they support.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; model internals, data provenance, and any fitted parameters are not described. The ledger is therefore minimal and provisional.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Complete trade isolation is a valid extreme scenario for estimating maximum cascade impacts.
Invoked to generate the 22% caloric-loss bound.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5546 in / 1237 out tokens · 40845 ms · 2026-05-08T04:10:34.047820+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 19 canonical work pages

[1]

Global Food Security24, 100360 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100360

Kummu, M., Kinnunen, P., Lehikoinen, E., Porkka, M., Queiroz, C., R¨ o¨ os, E., Troell, M., Weil, C.: Interplay of trade and food system resilience: Gains on supply diversity over time at the cost of trade independency. Global Food Security24, 100360 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100360

work page doi:10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100360 2020
[2]

Environmental Research Letters19(2), 024049 (2024) 21

Jia, J., Yang, W., Wu, F., Cui, X.: Elevated diversity of the supply chain boosts global food system resilience. Environmental Research Letters19(2), 024049 (2024) 21

2024
[3]

Nature Food4(6), 508–517 (2023)

Laber, M., Klimek, P., Bruckner, M., Yang, L., Thurner, S.: Shock propaga- tion from the russia–ukraine conflict on international multilayer food production network determines global food availability. Nature Food4(6), 508–517 (2023)

2023
[4]

Journal of Complex Networks11(5), 037 (2023)

Li, M.-Y., Wang, L., Xie, W.-J., Zhou, W.-X.: Quantifying the temporal stability of international fertilizer trade networks. Journal of Complex Networks11(5), 037 (2023)

2023
[5]

arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12173 (2022) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2203.12173 arXiv:2203.12173 [econ.GN]

G’oes, C., Bekkers, E.: The impact of geopolitical conflicts on trade, growth, and innovation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.12173 (2022) https://doi.org/10.48550/ arXiv.2203.12173 arXiv:2203.12173 [econ.GN]

work page arXiv 2022
[6]

https://doi.org/10.5089/ 9798400272745.001

Gopinath, G., Kalemli-Ozcan, S., Karabarbounis, L., Tanyeri, K., Wang, Z.: Changing global linkages: A new cold war? IMF Working Papers WP/24/76, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC (2024). https://doi.org/10.5089/ 9798400272745.001

2024
[7]

FEDS Notes, Wash- ington, DC

Airaudo, F., Soyres, F., Fisgin, E., Gaillard, A., Santacreu, A.M., Richards, K., Young, H.: Understanding Trade Fragmentation. FEDS Notes, Wash- ington, DC. Accessed: 2026-02-04 (2025). https://doi.org/10.17016/ 2380-7172.3960 . https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/ understanding-trade-fragmentation-20251212.html

work page arXiv 2026
[8]

Manage- ment International Review63(5), 823–859 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11575-023-00522-4

Zahoor, N., Wu, J., Khan, H., Khan, Z.: De-globalization, International Trade Protectionism, and the Reconfigurations of Global Value Chains. Manage- ment International Review63(5), 823–859 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11575-023-00522-4

2023
[9]

Technical report, World Economic Forum, Geneva (January 2025)

World Economic Forum: The global risks report 2025. Technical report, World Economic Forum, Geneva (January 2025). Insight Report. https://reports. weforum.org/docs/WEF Global Risks Report 2025.pdf

2025
[10]

One Earth8(1) (2025)

Quitzow, R., Balmaceda, M., Goldthau, A.: The nexus of geopolitics, decarboniza- tion, and food security gives rise to distinct challenges across fertilizer supply chains. One Earth8(1) (2025)

2025
[11]

Nature478(7369), 337–342 (2011)

Foley, J.A., Ramankutty, N., Brauman, K.A., Cassidy, E.S., Gerber, J.S., John- ston, M., Mueller, N.D., O’Connell, C., Ray, D.K., West, P.C.,et al.: Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature478(7369), 337–342 (2011)

2011
[12]

Nature communications10(1), 2844 (2019)

Zabel, F., Delzeit, R., Schneider, J.M., Seppelt, R., Mauser, W., V´ aclav´ ık, T.: Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity. Nature communications10(1), 2844 (2019)

2019
[13]

Nature Food 5(2), 111–115 (2024) 22

Brownlie, W.J., Alexander, P., Maslin, M., Ca˜ nedo-Arg¨ uelles, M., Sutton, M.A., Spears, B.M.: Global food security threatened by potassium neglect. Nature Food 5(2), 111–115 (2024) 22

2024
[14]

Nature Food5(6) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00979-y

Tonelli, D., Rosa, L., Gabrielli, P., Parente, A., Contino, F.: Cost-competitive decentralized ammonia fertilizer production can increase food security. Nature Food5(6) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00979-y

work page doi:10.1038/s43016-024-00979-y 2024
[15]

OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers (2024)

Jones, D., Deuss, A.: Understanding the resilience of fertiliser markets to shocks: an overview of fertiliser policies. OECD Food, Agriculture and Fisheries Papers (2024)

2024
[16]

Environmental Research Letters 18(1), 014008 (2023)

Rosa, L., Gabrielli, P.: Energy and food security implications of transitioning syn- thetic nitrogen fertilizers to net-zero emissions. Environmental Research Letters 18(1), 014008 (2023)

2023
[17]

Nature Food4(1), 84–95 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00659-9

Alexander, P., Arneth, A., Henry, R., Maire, J., Rabin, S., Rounsevell, M.D.A.: High energy and fertilizer prices are more damaging than food export curtailment from Ukraine and Russia for food prices, health and the environment. Nature Food4(1), 84–95 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00659-9

work page doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00659-9 2023
[18]

Tech- nical report, FAO, Rome (2025)

FAO: The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2025. Tech- nical report, FAO, Rome (2025). The State of Food Security and Nutri- tion in the World (SOFI) report. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/ ea9cebff-306c-49b7-8865-2aef3bfd25e2

2025
[19]

Nature food4(12), 1037–1046 (2023)

Ahvo, A., Heino, M., Sandstr¨ om, V., Chrisendo, D., Jalava, M., Kummu, M.: Agricultural input shocks affect crop yields more in the high-yielding areas of the world. Nature food4(12), 1037–1046 (2023)

2023
[20]

Food Security16(4), 845–865 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12571-024-01462-z

Li, X., Wang, H., Kharrazi, A., Fath, B.D., Liu, G., Liu, G., Xiao, Y., Lai, X.: A network analysis of external shocks on the dynamics and resilience of the global staple food trade. Food Security16(4), 845–865 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s12571-024-01462-z

2024
[21]

Scientific reports6(1), 26346 (2016)

Lee, K.-M., Goh, K.-I.: Strength of weak layers in cascading failures on multiplex networks: case of the international trade network. Scientific reports6(1), 26346 (2016)

2016
[22]

Energy251, 123939 (2022)

Wei, N., Xie, W.-J., Zhou, W.-X.: Robustness of the international oil trade network under targeted attacks to economies. Energy251, 123939 (2022)

2022
[23]

Plos one19(3), 0299833 (2024)

Kang, H., Lee, K.-M., Yang, J.-S.: The potential for cascading failures in the international trade network. Plos one19(3), 0299833 (2024)

2024
[24]

International Studies Quarterly52(1), 81–101 (2008)

Long, A.G.: Bilateral trade in the shadow of armed conflict. International Studies Quarterly52(1), 81–101 (2008)

2008
[25]

https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ Accessed 2024-06-07 23

FAO: FAO Statistical Database (2024). https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/ Accessed 2024-06-07 23

2024
[26]

World bank policy research working paper (2016)

Fantom, N.J., Serajuddin, U.: The World Bank’s classification of countries by income. World bank policy research working paper (2016)

2016
[27]

Environmental Research Letters11(9), 095009 (2016)

Marchand, P., Carr, J.A., Dell’Angelo, J., Fader, M., Gephart, J.A., Kummu, M., Magliocca, N.R., Porkka, M., Puma, M.J., Ratajczak, Z.,et al.: Reserves and trade jointly determine exposure to food supply shocks. Environmental Research Letters11(9), 095009 (2016)

2016
[28]

IFPRI book chapters, 92–96 (2023)

Glauber, J.W., Laborde Debucquet, D., Mamun, A.: From bad to worse: How Russia-Ukraine war-related export restrictions exacerbate global food insecurity. IFPRI book chapters, 92–96 (2023). Accessed 2026-04-15

2023
[29]

Nature Food4(1), 22–29 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s43016-022-00662-0

Wood, A., Queiroz, C., Deutsch, L., Gonz´ alez-Mon, B., Jonell, M., Pereira, L., Sinare, H., Svedin, U., Wass´ enius, E.: Reframing the local–global food systems debate through a resilience lens. Nature Food4(1), 22–29 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s43016-022-00662-0 . Number: 1

work page doi:10.1038/s43016-022-00662-0 2023
[30]

Nature Food4(12), 1090–1110 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s43016-023-00885-9

Schneider, K.R., Fanzo, J., Haddad, L., Herrero, M., Moncayo, J.R., Herforth, A., Remans, R., Guarin, A., Resnick, D., Covic, N., B´ en´ e, C., Cattaneo, A., Aburto, N., Ambikapathi, R., Aytekin, D., Barquera, S., Battersby, J., Beal, T., Molina, P.B., Cafiero, C., Campeau, C., Caron, P., Conforti, P., Damerau, K., Di Girolamo, M., DeClerck, F., Dewi, D.,...

work page doi:10.1038/s43016-023-00885-9 2030
[31]

Nature575(7781), 98–108 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3

Nystr¨ om, M., Jouffray, J.-B., Norstr¨ om, A.V., Crona, B., Søgaard Jørgensen, P., Carpenter, S.R., Bodin, ¨O., Galaz, V., Folke, C.: Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem. Nature575(7781), 98–108 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1712-3 2019
[32]

Nature Food, 1–3 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s43016-025-01244-6

Mangnus, E., Candel, J.: Food securitization and the unmaking of Euro- pean food policy reform. Nature Food, 1–3 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s43016-025-01244-6

2025
[33]

One Earth5(5), 470–472 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.004

P¨ ortner, L.M., Lambrecht, N., Springmann, M., Bodirsky, B.L., Gaupp, F., Freund, F., Lotze-Campen, H., Gabrysch, S.: We need a food system transformation—In the face of the Russia-Ukraine war, now more than ever. One Earth5(5), 470–472 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.oneear.2022.04.004 2022
[34]

npj Sustainable Agriculture1(1), 2 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-023-00002-0 24

Walsh, M., Schenk, G., Schmidt, S.: Realising the circular phosphorus economy delivers for sustainable development goals. npj Sustainable Agriculture1(1), 2 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1038/s44264-023-00002-0 24

work page doi:10.1038/s44264-023-00002-0 2023
[35]

Food Policy133, 102790 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102790

Vos, R., Glauber, J., Hebebrand, C., Rice, B.: Global shocks to fertilizer markets: Impacts on prices, demand and farm profitability. Food Policy133, 102790 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102790

work page doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102790 2025
[36]

IMF Working Papers2023(074) (2023) https: //doi.org/10.5089/9798400237768.001

Amaglobeli, D., Hong, G.H., Hanedar, E., Thevenot, C., Gu, M.: Policy Responses to High Energy and Food Prices. IMF Working Papers2023(074) (2023) https: //doi.org/10.5089/9798400237768.001 . Accessed 2026-04-20

work page doi:10.5089/9798400237768.001 2023
[37]

Communications Earth & Environment5(1), 481 (2024)

Kuhla, K., Puma, M.J., Otto, C.: International cooperation was key to stabi- lize wheat prices after the russian invasion of ukraine. Communications Earth & Environment5(1), 481 (2024)

2024
[38]

Nature Communications16(1), 10421 (2025)

Verschuur, J., Lumma, J., Hall, J.W.: Systemic impacts of disruptions at maritime chokepoints. Nature Communications16(1), 10421 (2025)

2025
[39]

Cirillo, P., Taleb, N.N.: What are the chances of war? Significance13(2), 44–45 (2016)

2016
[40]

Science advances4(2), 3580 (2018)

Clauset, A.: Trends and fluctuations in the severity of interstate wars. Science advances4(2), 3580 (2018)

2018
[41]

sco: a comparative study of outside powers’ mili- tary presence in central asia and the gulf

Sun, D., Elmahly, H.: Nato vs. sco: a comparative study of outside powers’ mili- tary presence in central asia and the gulf. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies12(4), 438–456 (2018)

2018
[42]

One Earth6(6), 682–704 (2023)

Gabrielli, P., Rosa, L., Gazzani, M., Meys, R., Bardow, A., Mazzotti, M., Sansavini, G.: Net-zero emissions chemical industry in a world of limited resources. One Earth6(6), 682–704 (2023)

2023
[43]

Accessed: 2025-09-01 (2025)

Snam: Energy Units and Conversion Factors - Snam Natural Gas Atlas. Accessed: 2025-09-01 (2025). http://www.snamatlas.it/energy units

2025
[44]

Accessed: 2025-09-01 (2021)

BP p.l.c.: Approximate Conversion Factors – Statistical Review of World Energy. Accessed: 2025-09-01 (2021). https://www.bp.com/content/dam/bp/ business-sites/en/global/corporate/pdfs/energy-economics/statistical-review/ bp-stats-review-2022-approximate-conversion-factors.pdf

2025
[45]

The 1994-2007 Version

Gaulier, G., Zignago, S.: BACI: International Trade Database at the Product- Level. The 1994-2007 Version. Working Papers 2010-23, CEPII (2010). https: //www.cepii.fr/CEPII/fr/publications/wp/abstract.asp?NoDoc=2726

1994
[46]

https://www.cepii.fr/DATA DOWNLOAD/baci/doc/baci webpage.html Accessed 2025-04-15

CEPII: The CEPII-BACI dataset (2025). https://www.cepii.fr/DATA DOWNLOAD/baci/doc/baci webpage.html Accessed 2025-04-15

2025
[47]

London (2023)

Energy Institute: Statistical Review of World Energy 2023. London (2023). https: //www.energyinst.org/statistical-review

2023
[48]

Sustainability14(3), 1431 (2022)

Hu, L., Song, C., Ye, S., Gao, P.: Spatiotemporal statistical imbalance: a long-term 25 neglected defect in un comtrade dataset. Sustainability14(3), 1431 (2022)

2022
[49]

7978538,https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7978538

Ahvo, A.: Data for article agricultural input shocks affect crop yields more in the high-yielding areas of the world. Zenodo (2024) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 8381197

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo 2024
[50]

Nature Food3(2), 122–132 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00447-x

Grinsven, H.J.M., Ebanyat, P., Glendining, M., Gu, B., Hijbeek, R., Lam, S.K., Lassaletta, L., Mueller, N.D., Pacheco, F.S., Quemada, M., Bruulsema, T.W., Jacobsen, B.H., Berge, H.F.M.: Establishing long-term nitrogen response of global cereals to assess sustainable fertilizer rates. Nature Food3(2), 122–132 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-021-00447-x

work page doi:10.1038/s43016-021-00447-x 2022
[51]

Harvard Dataverse (2020)

IFPRI: Global Spatially-Disaggregated Crop Production Statistics Data for 2010 Version 2.0. Harvard Dataverse (2020). https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/PRFF8V . https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/ PRFF8V Accessed 2021-02-17

work page doi:10.7910/dvn/prff8v 2010
[52]

Earth System Science Data12(4), 3545– 3572 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3545-2020

Yu, Q., You, L., Wood-Sichra, U., Ru, Y., Joglekar, A.K.B., Fritz, S., Xiong, W., Lu, M., Wu, W., Yang, P.: A cultivated planet in 2010 – Part 2: The global gridded agricultural-production maps. Earth System Science Data12(4), 3545– 3572 (2020) https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-3545-2020

work page doi:10.5194/essd-12-3545-2020 2010
[53]

https://data.worldbank.org (2025)

World Bank: World Development Indicators. https://data.worldbank.org (2025)

2025
[54]

Journal of Evolutionary Economics20(4), 479–514 (2010)

Fagiolo, G., Reyes, J., Schiavo, S.: The evolution of the world trade web: a weighted-network analysis. Journal of Evolutionary Economics20(4), 479–514 (2010)

2010
[55]

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals172, 113567 (2023)

Zhang, Y.-T., Zhou, W.-X.: Quantifying the status of economies in international crop trade networks: A correlation structure analysis of various node-ranking metrics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals172, 113567 (2023)

2023
[56]

Applied Network Science8(1), 59 (2023)

Fagiolo, G., Luzzati, D.S.: Centrality in the macroeconomic multi-network explains the spatiotemporal distribution of country per-capita income. Applied Network Science8(1), 59 (2023)

2023
[57]

figshare (2014) https://doi.org/10

Peixoto, T.P.: The graph-tool python library. figshare (2014) https://doi.org/10. 6084/m9.figshare.1164194 . Accessed 2014-09-10

2014
[58]

Physical Review E92(4), 042807 (2015)

Peixoto, T.P.: Inferring the mesoscale structure of layered, edge-valued, and time- varying networks. Physical Review E92(4), 042807 (2015)

2015
[59]

R., Millman, K

Harris, C.R., Millman, K.J., Walt, S.J., Gommers, R., Virtanen, P., Cournapeau, D., Wieser, E., Taylor, J., Berg, S., Smith, N.J., Kern, R., Picus, M., Hoyer, S., Kerkwijk, M.H., Brett, M., Haldane, A., R´ ıo, J.F., Wiebe, M., Peterson, P., G´ erard-Marchant, P., Sheppard, K., Reddy, T., Weckesser, W., Abbasi, H., Gohlke, C., Oliphant, T.E.: Array program...

work page doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 2020
[60]

Zen- odo (2020)

Jordahl, K., Bossche, J.V., Fleischmann, M., Wasserman, J., McBride, J., Gerard, J., Tratner, J., Perry, M., Badaracco, A.G., et al.: GeoPandas: v0.8.1. Zen- odo (2020). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3946761 . https://doi.org/10.5281/ zenodo.3946761

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.3946761 2020
[61]

Review of economics and statistics85(1), 226–234 (2003)

Deltas, G.: The small-sample bias of the gini coefficient: results and implications for empirical research. Review of economics and statistics85(1), 226–234 (2003)

2003
[62]

Frontiers in Environmental Science9, 672663 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.672663

Vittis, Y., Folberth, C., Bundle, S.-C., Obersteiner, M.: Restoring nature at lower food production costs. Frontiers in Environmental Science9, 672663 (2021) https: //doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.672663

work page doi:10.3389/fenvs.2021.672663 2021
[63]

International Fertilizer Association: Public summary: Shortterm fertilizer outlook 2024–2025. (2025). IFA Strategic Forum 2024 27 Supplementary text Supplement A Country-level role profiles in market concentration by centrality measure Each country carries a distinct functional position in the directed weighted trade graph: routing (represented by between...

2024
[64]

Therefore, the 2023 surge reflects new routing and demand- side functions

Russia’s position in N trade rose to all-time peaks in betweenness (0.74) and PageRank (0.62) in 2023, while its eigenvector centrality has been at the structural ceiling (1.0) since 1992. Therefore, the 2023 surge reflects new routing and demand- side functions. Turkey’s 2022-2023 leap for N trade in PageRank (0.41 to 0.93, an all-time peak), with betwee...

2023