pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08014 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-08 · 🧬 q-bio.NC · math.DS

Recognition: no theorem link

Dynamical mechanisms of flexible phase-locking in cortical theta oscillators

Benjamin R. Pittman-Polletta, Yangyang Wang

Pith reviewed 2026-05-11 02:21 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.NC math.DS
keywords theta oscillatorsphase lockingentrainmentdelayed Hopf bifurcationinhibitory currentscortical modelsspeech processing
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interactions between slow and superslow inhibitory currents expand the entrainment range of cortical theta oscillators through delayed Hopf phenomena.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Cortical theta oscillators must synchronize to external inputs like speech sounds that can be slower or faster than their own natural rhythm. The paper demonstrates that this flexibility comes from the interplay of two inhibitory currents operating on different timescales: one at theta speed and one even slower at delta speed. Their interaction creates long pauses in recovery after each input pulse, allowing the oscillator to adjust its phase over a broader set of input frequencies. This happens via a delayed Hopf bifurcation, a dynamical effect that is more prominent when the system receives external forcing. The result suggests multi-timescale inhibition as a general way for brain oscillators to handle variable input rates.

Core claim

In a biophysically grounded model of cortical theta oscillators, the interaction between the theta-timescale inhibitory current I_m and the superslow delta-timescale potassium current I_K_SS produces a three-timescale dynamical structure. This structure generates pronounced post-input recovery delays associated with a delayed Hopf bifurcation. The superslow current has minimal impact on the unforced oscillation but is essential for expanding the phase-locking range under external input, while the intermediate current further prolongs the recovery along the superslow manifold.

What carries the argument

the delayed Hopf bifurcation (DHB) arising from interactions between slow and superslow inhibitory currents in a three-timescale system

If this is right

  • The entrainment frequency range is substantially larger when both currents are present.
  • Removing the superslow current reduces the oscillator's ability to lock to slower inputs.
  • The mechanism is recruited specifically by external forcing rather than being active in spontaneous oscillations.
  • Coordination of multi-timescale inhibitory currents supports flexible phase-locking in cortical networks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This could allow auditory cortex to track speech at varying speaking rates without changing the oscillator's intrinsic properties.
  • Similar delayed recovery mechanisms might operate in other neural oscillators that need to synchronize to irregular or slow inputs.
  • Experimental tests could involve blocking the superslow potassium current and measuring changes in entrainment flexibility in cortical slices.

Load-bearing premise

The model currents I_m and I_K_SS and the delayed Hopf bifurcation accurately represent the key dynamics responsible for flexible phase-locking in real cortical neurons.

What would settle it

Recording from cortical neurons during rhythmic input stimulation and finding no evidence of prolonged recovery delays linked to superslow inhibitory processes, or showing that the model's predicted entrainment range does not match observed neural synchronization.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08014 by Benjamin R. Pittman-Polletta, Yangyang Wang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FI curves show the function of output frequency as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time traces of voltage (black) for (A) the full model (2.1) with Iapp = 9.8 and (B) the K− SS-system with Iapp = 6.8, gKSS = 0. Other unspecified parameters in each model are given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time traces of voltage (black) for (A) the full model (2.1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Projection of burst trajectory (dark yellow) of the K [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Delay of spiking D of (Top Panel) the full model and (Bottom Panel) the K− SS-system, in response to a single pulse lasting 1/4 of a cycle from 3 Hz periodic inputs. Magenta bar indicates the timing of the input pulse; magenta star indicates the first post-input spike. (A) Voltage traces with (solid lines) and without (dotted lines) an input pulse. (B) Buildup of outward m current. Figure 6A and B show the… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Simulation of the solution of the K− SS-system and its response to periodic input pulses at 3 Hz, together with corresponding bifurcation diagrams, for I = 6.8, gKCa = 0 and other parameters as given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Solution trajectories of the K− SS-system with (Top row) default timescales and (Bottom row) exaggerated timescale separation as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Delay of spiking D of (Top panel) the full model with Iapp = 8 and (Bottom panel) the M−-system, in response to a single pulse lasting 1/4 of a cycle from 0.7 Hz periodic inputs. Model parameters are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Simulation of the solution of the M−-system and its response to periodic input pulses at 0.7 Hz, together with corresponding bifurcation diagrams, for Iapp = 8, gm = 0, gl = 0.16 and other parameters as given in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Local dynamics of the M−-system. (A) Time evolution of trajectories starting at different positions along MSS which are denoted by stars in (B). (B) Projection of trajectories from panel (A) onto (q, V )-space. The red diamond denotes the Hopf bifurcation, whereas the black circle denotes the full system equilibrium which is a saddle focus. (C) The relationship between the difference between q value at th… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The relationship between input frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Simulation of the full theta oscillator model and its respon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Local oscillations and bifurcation delay in the full system w [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Two-parameter bifurcations of the fast M [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Real part of the two eigenvalues of the fast-slow subsy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Oscillatory activity in auditory cortex is thought to play a central role in auditory and speech processing by synchronizing neural rhythms to external acoustic features of the speech stream. To support this function, cortical oscillators must flexibly phase-lock to inputs spanning a wide range of timescales, including rhythms substantially slower than their intrinsic frequency. Here we identify a general dynamical mechanism by which intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales enable such flexible phase-locking. Using tools from dynamical systems theory, we show that interactions between slow and superslow inhibitory processes generate prolonged post-input recovery delays through delayed Hopf phenomena, thereby substantially expanding the frequency range over which entrainment can occur. We demonstrate this mechanisms in a biophysically grounded cortical theta oscillator model for speech segmentation. Specifically, we show that both a theta-timescale (4-8 Hz) inhibitory current $I_m$ and a slower delta-timescale (1-4 Hz) inhibitory potassium current $I_{\rm K_{SS}}$ are crucial for entrainment flexibility. Their interaction creates a three-timescale structure that gives rise to pronounced delay phenomena associated with a delayed Hopf bifurcation (DHB). Interestingly, the superslow $I_{\rm K_{SS}}$ and the associated DHB play little role in the unforced oscillatory dynamics, but are recruited to support phase locking under external forcing. Moreover, the intermediate-timescale current $I_m$, rather than being redundant, further expands the phase-locking range by prolonging delayed recovery along the superslow manifold. Together, these results suggest that coordination among intrinsic inhibitory currents operating on multiple timescales may represent a key mechanism supporting flexible phase locking to rhythmic inputs in the brain.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in a biophysically grounded cortical theta oscillator model, interactions between a theta-timescale inhibitory current I_m and a superslow delta-timescale potassium current I_K_SS create a three-timescale dynamical structure. This structure produces prolonged post-input recovery delays via delayed Hopf bifurcation (DHB) phenomena, substantially expanding the frequency range for flexible phase-locking to external rhythmic inputs, with relevance to auditory cortex and speech segmentation. The superslow current is said to play little role in unforced dynamics but is recruited under forcing, while I_m further expands the locking range by prolonging recovery along the superslow manifold.

Significance. If the mechanism holds, the work provides a concrete dynamical-systems account of how multi-timescale inhibition supports entrainment beyond an oscillator's intrinsic frequency, which could be relevant for models of auditory and speech processing. The emphasis on delayed Hopf phenomena as a general principle for flexible phase-locking, identified through analysis of a conductance-based model, is a potential strength if supported by targeted verification.

major comments (2)
  1. [Results on forced dynamics and DHB analysis] The attribution of expanded entrainment specifically to the delayed Hopf bifurcation arising from I_m / I_K_SS interaction is load-bearing for the central claim but lacks direct causal verification. The manuscript reports forward simulations showing recruitment of I_K_SS under forcing and prolongation by I_m, yet does not include ablation experiments (e.g., setting the conductance of I_K_SS to zero while retaining I_m) to test whether the entrainment bandwidth collapses, nor manifold continuation past the putative DHB point to quantify the delay scaling. Without these, the necessity of the DHB mechanism versus effects of the slow current alone remains an interpretation.
  2. [Dynamical systems analysis and entrainment simulations] The three-timescale structure is presented as enabling pronounced delay phenomena, but the quantitative mapping from the DHB to the observed expansion in locking range (e.g., specific frequency bounds tested and effect sizes) is not tied to explicit bifurcation diagrams or delay estimates in the reported figures. This weakens the link between the dynamical mechanism and the functional claim of 'substantially expanding' the entrainment range.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model description] Notation for the currents (I_m and I_{K_SS}) is introduced clearly in the abstract but should be cross-referenced with explicit equations in the model section for readers unfamiliar with the specific conductances.
  2. [Abstract and unforced dynamics] The abstract states that I_K_SS 'plays little role in the unforced dynamics'; a brief quantification of this (e.g., change in intrinsic frequency or stability when I_K_SS is removed) would strengthen the contrast with its role under forcing.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments, which highlight important opportunities to strengthen the causal evidence for the delayed Hopf bifurcation mechanism. We have revised the manuscript accordingly and address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The attribution of expanded entrainment specifically to the delayed Hopf bifurcation arising from I_m / I_K_SS interaction is load-bearing for the central claim but lacks direct causal verification. The manuscript reports forward simulations showing recruitment of I_K_SS under forcing and prolongation by I_m, yet does not include ablation experiments (e.g., setting the conductance of I_K_SS to zero while retaining I_m) to test whether the entrainment bandwidth collapses, nor manifold continuation past the putative DHB point to quantify the delay scaling. Without these, the necessity of the DHB mechanism versus effects of the slow current alone remains an interpretation.

    Authors: We agree that ablation experiments and manifold continuation would provide stronger causal support. In the revised manuscript we have added simulations in which the conductance of I_K_SS is set to zero while I_m is retained; these show a clear collapse of the entrainment bandwidth, indicating that the superslow current is necessary for the expanded range. We have also performed and included numerical continuation along the superslow manifold past the DHB, which quantifies the delay scaling and demonstrates that the prolongation arises specifically from the delayed Hopf phenomenon rather than from the slow current in isolation. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The three-timescale structure is presented as enabling pronounced delay phenomena, but the quantitative mapping from the DHB to the observed expansion in locking range (e.g., specific frequency bounds tested and effect sizes) is not tied to explicit bifurcation diagrams or delay estimates in the reported figures. This weakens the link between the dynamical mechanism and the functional claim of 'substantially expanding' the entrainment range.

    Authors: We accept that the original figures did not make the quantitative connection explicit enough. The revised manuscript now includes bifurcation diagrams that locate the DHB within the three-timescale system and directly relate it to the frequency bounds used in the entrainment simulations. We have also added explicit delay estimates obtained from the DHB analysis, showing how the mechanism produces the observed expansion in locking range. These additions tie the dynamical structure to the functional results more rigorously. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation rests on independent dynamical analysis of the model

full rationale

The paper constructs a biophysically grounded theta oscillator model incorporating I_m and I_K_SS, then applies standard dynamical systems tools (phase-plane analysis, manifold reduction, bifurcation tracking) to demonstrate that their interaction produces delayed Hopf phenomena and expanded entrainment range. The central claim is obtained by forward integration and continuation of the model's ODEs under forcing; it is not obtained by fitting parameters to the target entrainment bandwidth, redefining the output as input, or invoking self-citations whose content is presupposed. The statements that I_K_SS is recruited only under forcing and that I_m prolongs recovery along the superslow manifold are direct consequences of the three-timescale structure and the location of the DHB, not tautological restatements. No load-bearing step reduces to a fitted input or to a prior result by the same authors that itself lacks independent verification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters or invented entities; the mechanism rests on standard dynamical systems concepts applied to a neuroscience model.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Cortical theta oscillators can be modeled using biophysically grounded equations incorporating theta-timescale inhibitory current I_m and delta-timescale potassium current I_K_SS
    This modeling choice underpins the demonstration of the entrainment mechanism in the speech segmentation context.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1341 out tokens · 89272 ms · 2026-05-11T02:21:13.668459+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 112 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Phase-resett ing curves determine synchroniza- tion, phase locking, and clustering in networks of neural os cillators

    Srisairam Achuthan and Carmen C Canavier. Phase-resett ing curves determine synchroniza- tion, phase locking, and clustering in networks of neural os cillators. Journal of Neuroscience , 29(16):5218–5233, 2009

  2. [2]

    Synchroniz ation of strongly coupled excitatory neurons: relating network behavior to biophysics

    Corey D Acker, Nancy Kopell, and John A White. Synchroniz ation of strongly coupled excitatory neurons: relating network behavior to biophysics. Journal of computational neuroscience , 15(1):71– 90, 2003. 24

  3. [3]

    Adams, C

    N.E. Adams, C. Teige, G. Mollo, T. Karapanagiotidis, P.L . Cornelissen, and J. Smallwood et al. Theta/deltacoupling across cortical laminae contributes tosemantic cognition. Journal of neuro- physiology, 121(4):1150–1161, 2019

  4. [4]

    The brain’s best kept secret is its degenerate structure

    Larissa Albantakis, Christophe Bernard, Naama Brenner , Eve Marder, and Rishikesh Narayanan. The brain’s best kept secret is its degenerate structure. Journal of Neuroscience , 44(40), 2024

  5. [5]

    Awal, I.R

    N.M. Awal, I.R. Epstein, T.J. Kaper, and T. Vo. Symmetry- breaking rhythms in coupled, identical fast–slow oscillators. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 33(1), 2023

  6. [6]

    S. M. Baer, T. Erneux, and J. Rinzel. The slow passage thro ugh a Hopf bifurcation: Delay, memory effects, and resonance. SIAM J. Appl. Math. , 49(1):55–71, 1989

  7. [7]

    Baldemir, D

    H. Baldemir, D. Avitabile, and K. Tsaneva-Atanasova. Ps eudo-plateau bursting and mixed-mode oscillations in a model of developing inner hair cells. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat , 80:104979, 2020

  8. [8]

    Battaglin and M

    S. Battaglin and M. G. Pedersen. Geometric analysis of mi xed-mode oscillations in a model of electrical activity in human beta-cells. Nonlinear Dyn. , 104(4):4445–4457, 2021

  9. [9]

    ¨Uber das elektroenkephalogramm des menschen

    Hans Berger. ¨Uber das elektroenkephalogramm des menschen. Archiv f¨ ur psychiatrie und ner- venkrankheiten, 87(1):527–570, 1929

  10. [10]

    Brøns, M

    M. Brøns, M. Krupa, and M. Wechselberger. Mixed mode osc illations due to the generalized canard phenomenon. Fields Inst. Commun. , 49:39–63, 2006

  11. [11]

    Oxford university press, 2006

    Gy¨ orgy Buzs´ aki.Rhythms of the Brain . Oxford university press, 2006

  12. [12]

    The origin of extracellular fields and currents—eeg, ecog, lfp and spikes

    Gy¨ orgy Buzs´ aki, Costas A Anastassiou, and Christof K och. The origin of extracellular fields and currents—eeg, ecog, lfp and spikes. Nature reviews neuroscience , 13(6):407–420, 2012

  13. [13]

    Neuronal oscillat ions in cortical networks

    Gyorgy Buzsaki and Andreas Draguhn. Neuronal oscillat ions in cortical networks. science, 304(5679):1926–1929, 2004

  14. [14]

    Pulse couple d oscillators and the phase resetting curve

    Carmen C Canavier and Srisairam Achuthan. Pulse couple d oscillators and the phase resetting curve. Mathematical biosciences, 226(2):77–96, 2010

  15. [15]

    The leaky oscillator : Properties of inhibition-based rhythms revealed through the singular phase response curve

    Jonathan Cannon and Nancy Kopell. The leaky oscillator : Properties of inhibition-based rhythms revealed through the singular phase response curve. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems , 14(4):1930–1977, 2015

  16. [16]

    L. M. Carracedo, H. Kjeldsen, L. Cunnington, A. Jenkins , I. Schofield, and et al. M.O. Cunningham, M. O. A neocortical delta rhythm facilitates reciprocal int erlaminar interactions via nested theta rhythms. Journal of Neuroscience , 33(26):10750–10761, 2013

  17. [17]

    P hase-amplitude response functions for transient-state stimuli

    Oriol Castej´ on, Antoni Guillamon, and Gemma Huguet. P hase-amplitude response functions for transient-state stimuli. The Journal of Mathematical Neuroscience , 3(1):13, 2013

  18. [18]

    The natural statistics of audiovisual speech

    Chandramouli Chandrasekaran, Andrea Trubanova, S´ ebastien Stillittano, Alice Caplier, and Asif A Ghazanfar. The natural statistics of audiovisual speech. PLoS computational biology, 5(7):e1000436, 2009

  19. [19]

    G. A. Chumakov, N. A. Chumakova, and E. A. Lashina. Model ing the complex dynamics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions with fast, intermediat e, and slow variables. Chem. Eng. J. , 282:11–19, 2015

  20. [20]

    Fun ctional phase response curves: a method for understanding synchronization of adapting neurons

    Jianxia Cui, Carmen C Canavier, and Robert J Butera. Fun ctional phase response curves: a method for understanding synchronization of adapting neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology , 102(1):387– 398, 2009

  21. [21]

    R. Curtu. Singular Hopf bifurcation and mixed-mode osc illations in a two-cell inhibitory neural network. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. , 239(9):504–514, 2010

  22. [22]

    Curtu and J

    R. Curtu and J. Rubin. Interaction of canard and singula r Hopf mechanisms in a neural model. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 10(4):1443–1479, 2011

  23. [23]

    De Maesschalck, E

    P. De Maesschalck, E. Kutafina, and N. Popovi´ c. Three ti me-scales in an extended Bonhoeffer–van der Pol oscillator. J. Dyn. Differ. Equ. , 26:955–987, 2014. 25

  24. [24]

    De Maesschalck, E

    P. De Maesschalck, E. Kutafina, and N. Popovi´ c. Sector-delayed-Hopf-type mixed-mode oscillations in a prototypical three-time-scale model. Appl. Math. Comput. , 273:337–352, 2016

  25. [25]

    Desroches, J

    M. Desroches, J. Guckenheimer, B. Krauskopf, C. Kuehn, H. M. Osinga, and M. Wechselberger. Mixed-mode oscillations with multiple time scales. SIAM Rev. , 54(2):211–288, 2012

  26. [26]

    Desroches and V

    M. Desroches and V. Kirk. Spike-adding in a canonical th ree-time-scale model: superslow explosion and folded-saddle canards. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 17(3):1989–2017, 2018

  27. [27]

    Temporal modulations in speech and music

    Nai Ding, Aniruddh D Patel, Lin Chen, Henry Butler, Chen g Luo, and David Poeppel. Temporal modulations in speech and music. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews , 81:181–187, 2017

  28. [28]

    Drover, J

    J. Drover, J. Rubin, J. Su, and B. Erentrout. Analysis of a canard mechanism by which excitatory synaptic coupling can synchronize neurons at low firing freq uencies. SIAM J. APPL. MATH. , 65(1):69–92, 2004

  29. [29]

    Degeneracy and comp lexity in biological systems

    Gerald M Edelman and Joseph A Gally. Degeneracy and comp lexity in biological systems. Pro- ceedings of the national academy of sciences , 98(24):13763–13768, 2001

  30. [30]

    D elays and advances in the onset of instability in the shishkova equation

    Hans Engler, Hans Kaper, Tasso Kaper, and Theodore Vo. D elays and advances in the onset of instability in the shishkova equation. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics , 2025

  31. [31]

    Ermentrout

    B. Ermentrout. Type i membranes, phase resetting curve s, and synchrony. Neural Comput., 8:979– 1001, 1996

  32. [32]

    Type i membranes, phase resetting cur ves, and synchrony

    Bard Ermentrout. Type i membranes, phase resetting cur ves, and synchrony. Neural computation, 8(5):979–1001, 1996

  33. [33]

    The effects of spike frequency adaptation and negative feedback on the synchronization of neural osci llators

    Bard Ermentrout, Matthew Pascal, and Boris Gutkin. The effects of spike frequency adaptation and negative feedback on the synchronization of neural osci llators. Neural computation, 13(6):1285– 1310, 2001

  34. [34]

    Mathematical foundations of neuroscience , volume 35

    Bard Ermentrout and David Hillel Terman. Mathematical foundations of neuroscience , volume 35. Springer, 2010

  35. [35]

    n: m phase-locking of weakly coupled oscillators

    G Bard Ermentrout. n: m phase-locking of weakly coupled oscillators. Journal of Mathematical Biology, 12(3):327–342, 1981

  36. [36]

    Multiple pulse inte ractions and averaging in systems of coupled neural oscillators

    G Bard Ermentrout and Nancy Kopell. Multiple pulse inte ractions and averaging in systems of coupled neural oscillators. Journal of Mathematical Biology , 29(3):195–217, 1991

  37. [37]

    Fenichel

    N. Fenichel. Geometric singular perturbation theory f or ordinary differential equations. J. Differ. Equ., 31(1):53–98, 1979

  38. [38]

    O. Ghitza. Behavioral evidence for the role of cortical theta oscillations in determining auditory channel capacity for speech. Frontiers in psychology , 5:652, 2014

  39. [39]

    Ghitza and S

    O. Ghitza and S. Greenberg. On the possible role of brain rhythms in speech perception: intel- ligibility of time-compressed speech with periodic and ape riodic insertions of silence. Phonetica, 66(1-2):113–126, 2009

  40. [40]

    Linking speech perception and neurophysi ology: speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm

    Oded Ghitza. Linking speech perception and neurophysi ology: speech decoding guided by cascaded oscillators locked to the input rhythm. Frontiers in psychology , 2:130, 2011

  41. [41]

    On the role of theta-driven syllabic parsi ng in decoding speech: intelligibility of speech with a manipulated modulation spectrum

    Oded Ghitza. On the role of theta-driven syllabic parsi ng in decoding speech: intelligibility of speech with a manipulated modulation spectrum. Frontiers in psychology , 3:238, 2012

  42. [42]

    Brain’s alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and theta oscillationsin neuropsy- chiatric diseases: proposal for biomarker strategies

    Gorsev Giilmen Yenera’c’d’e. Brain’s alpha, beta, gamma, delta, and theta oscillationsin neuropsy- chiatric diseases: proposal for biomarker strategies

  43. [43]

    Ion channel degene racy, variability, and covariation in neuron and circuit resilience

    Jean-Marc Goaillard and Eve Marder. Ion channel degene racy, variability, and covariation in neuron and circuit resilience. Annual review of neuroscience , 44(1):335–357, 2021

  44. [44]

    Speaking in shorthand–a syllable-c entric perspective for understanding pronun- ciation variation

    Steven Greenberg. Speaking in shorthand–a syllable-c entric perspective for understanding pronun- ciation variation. Speech Communication, 29(2-4):159–176, 1999

  45. [45]

    Guckenheimer and A

    J. Guckenheimer and A. R. Willms. Asymptotic analysis o f subcritical Hopf-homoclinic bifurcation. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. , 139(3-4):195–216, 2000

  46. [46]

    Gutfreund, Y

    Y. Gutfreund, Y. Yarom, and I. Segev. Subthreshold osci llations and resonant frequency in guinea- pig cortical neurons: physiology and modelling. The Journal of physiology , 483(3):621–640, 1985. 26

  47. [47]

    Hansel, G

    D. Hansel, G. Mato, and C. Meunier. Synchrony in excitat ory neural networks. Neural Comput. , 7:307–337, 1995

  48. [48]

    Harvey, V

    E. Harvey, V. Kirk, M. Wechselberger, and J. Sneyd. Mult iple timescales, mixed mode oscillations and canards in models of intracellular calcium dynamics. J. Nonlinear Sci. , 21:639–683, 2011

  49. [49]

    M. G. Hayes, T. J. Kaper, P. Szmolyan, and M. Wechselberg er. Geometric desingularization of degenerate singularities in the presence of fast rotation: A new proof of known results for slow passage through Hopf bifurcations. Indag. Math. , 27(5):1184–1203, 2016

  50. [50]

    Combining predictive coding and neural oscillations enables online syllable recognition i n natural speech

    Sevada Hovsepyan, Itsaso Olasagasti, and Anne-Lise Gi raud. Combining predictive coding and neural oscillations enables online syllable recognition i n natural speech. Nature communications, 11(1):3117, 2020

  51. [51]

    J. L. Hudson, M. Hart, and D. Marinko. An experimental st udy of multiple peak periodic and nonperiodic oscillations in the Belousov–Zhabotinskii re action. J. Chem. Phys. , 71(4):1601–1606, 1979

  52. [52]

    Hyafil, L

    A. Hyafil, L. Fontolan, C. Kabdebon, B. Gutkin, and A.L. G iraud. Speech encoding by coupled cortical theta and gamma oscillations. Elife, 4, 2015

  53. [53]

    Speech encoding by coupled cortical theta and gamma oscilla tions

    Alexandre Hyafil, Lorenzo Fontolan, Claire Kabdebon, B oris Gutkin, and Anne-Lise Giraud. Speech encoding by coupled cortical theta and gamma oscilla tions. elife, 4:e06213, 2015

  54. [54]

    Jalics, M

    J. Jalics, M. Krupa, and H. G. Rotstein. Mixed-mode osci llations in a three time-scale system of ODEs motivated by a neuronal model. Dyn. Syst. , 25(4):445–482, 2010

  55. [55]

    Kaklamanos and N

    P. Kaklamanos and N. Popovi´ c. Complex oscillatory dyn amics in a three-timescale El Ni˜ no South- ern Oscillation model. Phys. D: Nonlinear Phenom. , 449:133740, 2023

  56. [56]

    Kaklamanos, N

    P. Kaklamanos, N. Popovi´ c, and K. U. Kristiansen. Bifu rcations of mixed-mode oscillations in three-timescale systems: An extended prototypical exampl e. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 32(1):013108, 2022

  57. [57]

    Kaklamanos, N

    P. Kaklamanos, N. Popovi´ c, and K. U. Kristiansen. Geom etric singular perturbation analysis of the multiple-timescale Hodgkin-Huxley equations. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 22(3):1552–1589, 2023

  58. [58]

    Kimrey, T

    J. Kimrey, T. Vo, and R. Bertram. Big ducks in the heart: c anard analysis can explain large early afterdepolarizations in cardiomyocytes. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 19(3):1701–1735, 2020

  59. [59]

    Kimrey, T

    J. Kimrey, T. Vo, and R. Bertram. Canard analysis reveal s why a large Ca 2+ window current promotes early afterdepolarizations in cardiac myocytes. PLoS Comput. Biol. , 16(11):e1008341, 2020

  60. [60]

    Phase response func- tion for oscillators with strong forcing or coupling

    Vladimir Klinshov, Serhiy Yanchuk, Artur Stephan, and Vladimir Nekorkin. Phase response func- tion for oscillators with strong forcing or coupling. Europhysics Letters, 118(5):50006, 2017

  61. [61]

    Mechanisms of phase -locking and frequency control in pairs of coupled neural oscillators

    Nancy Kopell and G Bard Ermentrout. Mechanisms of phase -locking and frequency control in pairs of coupled neural oscillators. Handbook of dynamical systems , 2:3–54, 2002

  62. [62]

    Krupa, N

    M. Krupa, N. Popovi´ c, and N. Kopell. Mixed-mode oscill ations in three time-scale systems: a prototypical example. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 7(2):361–420, 2008

  63. [63]

    Krupa, N

    M. Krupa, N. Popovi´ c, N. Kopell, and H. G. Rotstein. Mix ed-mode oscillations in a three time- scale model for the dopaminergic neuron. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science , 18(1):015106, 2008

  64. [64]

    Krupa, A

    M. Krupa, A. Vidal, M. Desroches, and F. Cl´ ement. Mixed -mode oscillations in a multiple time scale phantom bursting system. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 11(4):1458–1498, 2012

  65. [65]

    Krupa and M

    M. Krupa and M. Wechselberger. Local analysis near a fol ded saddle-node singularity. J. Differ. Equ., 248(12):2841–2888, 2010

  66. [66]

    K¨ ugler, A

    P. K¨ ugler, A. H. Erhardt, and M. A. K. Bulelzai. Early af terdepolarizations in cardiac action potentials as mixed mode oscillations due to a folded node si ngularity. PLoS One, 13(12):e0209498, 2018. 27

  67. [67]

    An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex

    Peter Lakatos, Ankoor S Shah, Kevin H Knuth, Istvan Ulbe rt, George Karmos, and Charles E Schroeder. An oscillatory hierarchy controlling neuronal excitability and stimulus processing in the auditory cortex. Journal of neurophysiology , 94(3):1904–1911, 2005

  68. [68]

    Letson, J

    B. Letson, J. E. Rubin, and T. Vo. Analysis of interactin g local oscillation mechanisms in three- timescale systems. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 77(3):1020–1046, 2017

  69. [69]

    Phase resetting reduce s theta–gamma rhythmic interaction to a one-dimensional map

    Paola Malerba and Nancy Kopell. Phase resetting reduce s theta–gamma rhythmic interaction to a one-dimensional map. Journal of mathematical biology , 66(7):1361–1386, 2013

  70. [70]

    Synchronizatio n of pulse-coupled biological oscillators

    Renato E Mirollo and Steven H Strogatz. Synchronizatio n of pulse-coupled biological oscillators. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics , 50(6):1645–1662, 1990

  71. [71]

    Morris and H

    C. Morris and H. Lecar. Voltage oscillations in the barn acle giant muscle fiber. Biophys. J. , 35(1):193–213, 1981

  72. [72]

    P. Nan, Y. Wang, V. Kirk, and J. E. Rubin. Understanding a nd distinguishing three-time-scale oscillations: Case study in a coupled Morris-Lecar system. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , 14(3):1518– 1557, 2015

  73. [73]

    Neishtadt

    A. Neishtadt. On delayed stability loss under dynamica l bifurcations I. Differ. Equ. , 23:1385–1390, 1987

  74. [74]

    Neishtadt

    A. Neishtadt. On delayed stability loss under dynamica l bifurcations II. Differ. Equ. , 24:171–176, 1988

  75. [75]

    The temporal regulation of speech

    John J Ohala. The temporal regulation of speech. Auditory analysis and perception of speech , pages 431–453, 1975

  76. [76]

    The utility of phase models in studying neural synchronization

    Youngmin Park, Stewart Heitmann, and G Bard Ermentrout . The utility of phase models in studying neural synchronization. Computational models of brain and behavior , pages 493–504, 2017

  77. [77]

    Pavlidis, F

    E. Pavlidis, F. Campillo, A. Goldbeter, and M. Desroche s. Multiple-timescale dynamics, mixed mode oscillations and mixed affective states in a model of bip olar disorder. Cognitive Neurodynam- ics, 2022

  78. [78]

    Global ph ase-amplitude description of oscillatory dy- namics via the parameterization method

    Alberto P´ erez-Cervera, Gemma Huguet, et al. Global ph ase-amplitude description of oscillatory dy- namics via the parameterization method. Chaos: an interdisciplinary journal of nonlinear science , 30(8), 2020

  79. [79]

    Phase-locked states in oscillating neural networks and their role in neural communication

    Alberto P´ erez-Cervera, Tere M Seara, and Gemma Huguet . Phase-locked states in oscillating neural networks and their role in neural communication. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation , 80:104992, 2020

  80. [80]

    Perryman and S

    C. Perryman and S. Wieczorek. Adapting to a changing env ironment: non-obvious thresholds in multi-scale systems. Proc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. , 470(2170):20140226, 2014

Showing first 80 references.