arxiv: 2605.08791 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · ⚛️ physics.optics · physics.app-ph

Recognition: no theorem link

Reconfigurable Magnetic Nanopore Platform for Selective Trapping

Nageswar Reddy Sanamreddy , Jeanne Maunier , Malavika Kayyil Veedu , Anastasiia Sapunova , Nicol\`o Maccaferri , Denis Garoli , J\'er\^ome Wenger , Paolo Vavassori

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 00:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics physics.app-ph

keywords nanoporesmagnetic tweezersfluorescence microscopyflux-closure stateactive controlmagnetic nanoparticlessolid-state sensors

0 comments

The pith

Magnetic nanopores can be switched on and off with short pulses to trap and release tagged biomolecules on demand.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Solid-state nanopores confine individual analytes for analysis but operate passively and cannot control particle position or dynamics. The work integrates a ferromagnetic layer into the nanopore, creating localized stray magnetic fields that enable magnetic tweezing of functionalized nanoparticles. The pore geometry is engineered to switch reversibly between a uniform magnetization state and a flux-closure state when short magnetic field pulses of controlled amplitude are applied. This switching activates or deactivates the tweezing effect, allowing selective capture and release. A proof-of-concept experiment shows trapping of fluorescent magnetic particles, demonstrating a route to active, reconfigurable nanopore platforms for high-throughput single-particle detection.

Core claim

The central claim is that a ferromagnetic layer integrated into a solid-state nanopore acts as a magnetic discontinuity that produces localized stray fields for magnetic tweezing; the chosen geometry permits reversible transitions between a nearly uniform magnetization state and a magnetic flux-closure state via short applied field pulses, thereby turning the tweezing force on or off at will for controlled capture and release of tagged magnetic nanoparticles.

What carries the argument

The reconfigurable nanopore geometry that switches between nearly uniform magnetization and flux-closure states to control the presence of localized stray magnetic fields.

If this is right

Magnetic tweezing can be activated or deactivated on demand for selective trapping and release of tagged biomolecules.
The platform enables controlled particle positioning inside the pore, overcoming the passive limitation of conventional nanopores.
Selective trapping of fluorescent magnetic particles is shown as proof of concept.
Reconfigurable on-chip systems become feasible for high-throughput single-particle detection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same pulse-controlled switching could be paired with simultaneous electrical or optical readout to study trapped molecules under defined magnetic forces.
Pulse sequences might allow differential sorting of particles carrying different magnetic tags within a single device.
The architecture suggests a route to multiplexed analysis where magnetic control is used to hold and then interrogate multiple analytes in sequence.

Load-bearing premise

Adding the ferromagnetic layer and applying magnetic pulses will leave the nanopore structurally intact, preserve its sensing resolution and biocompatibility, and still produce stray fields strong enough for reliable trapping.

What would settle it

Direct observation that fluorescent magnetic particles are captured only in the flux-closure state and released upon a pulse that restores uniform magnetization, without measurable pore damage or loss of optical signal, would support the claim; absence of reversible switching or degradation in pore performance would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08791 by Anastasiia Sapunova, Denis Garoli, Jeanne Maunier, J\'er\^ome Wenger, Malavika Kayyil Veedu, Nageswar Reddy Sanamreddy, Nicol\`o Maccaferri, Paolo Vavassori.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) Magnetic response of periodic nanopores and circular FM structures measured by MOKE microscopy, showing (i) the full hysteresis loop and (ii) the vortex loop highlighting the demagnetization protocol for the circular FM structures. Point 1 corresponds to the remanent Linear state of the periodic nanopores and the onion state of the circular FM structures, whereas point 2 corresponds to the vortex state… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Fluorescence characterization of the magnetic trapping for the periodic nanopores (a-c) and the ring-surrounded nanopores (d-f). The transmission images in (a,d) with lamp illumination confirm the sample is well positioned at the microscope focus. All the images share the same 10 µm horizontal field of view. The fluorescence images in (b,c) and (e,f) are recorded with confocal laser scanning. In the absenc… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Solid-state nanopores offer a powerful platform for nanoscale analysis of individual analytes, including biomolecules and functionalized nanoparticles, by confining them within a precisely defined sensing region. However, their inherently passive operation restricts practical applications, as they cannot precisely control particle position or dynamics inside the pore. Here, we introduce magnetic nanopore architectures that integrate a ferromagnetic layer into the nanopore system. Acting as a magnetic discontinuity within an otherwise uniformly magnetized film, the nanopore generates localized stray magnetic fields that enable magnetic tweezing of magnetic nanoparticles, which can be functionalized with fluorescent biomolecules. Importantly, the nanopore geometry is designed to reversibly switch between a nearly uniform magnetization state and a magnetic flux-closure state through the application of short magnetic field pulses of controlled amplitude. This capability allows the magnetic tweezing effect to be selectively activated or deactivated, enabling controlled capture and release of tagged biomolecules on demand. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate the selective magnetic trapping of fluorescent magnetic particles. These findings pave the way for reconfigurable, on-chip magnetic nanopore platforms capable of selective trapping and high-throughput single-particle detection. KEYWORDS: Nanopores, magnetic tweezers, fluorescence microscopy, vortex state, active control, magnetic nanoparticles

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper describes a nanopore with a ferromagnetic layer that traps magnetic particles and claims the geometry can be pulsed to toggle the trapping on and off, but the switching step is asserted rather than measured.

read the letter

The central idea is a solid-state nanopore that incorporates a ferromagnetic film so the pore itself acts as a magnetic discontinuity. This produces localized stray fields that pull in magnetic nanoparticles tagged with fluorescent biomolecules. The geometry is meant to support two magnetization configurations—a nearly uniform state and a flux-closure state—that can be flipped with brief external field pulses, turning the trapping force on or off without changing anything else in the device. They show a proof-of-concept image of particles being held at the pore under one condition.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces magnetic nanopore architectures that integrate a ferromagnetic layer to generate localized stray magnetic fields for tweezing functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. The nanopore geometry is designed to reversibly switch between a nearly uniform magnetization state and a flux-closure state via short magnetic field pulses of controlled amplitude, enabling on-demand activation and deactivation of trapping for selective capture and release of tagged biomolecules. A qualitative proof-of-concept demonstration of selective trapping of fluorescent magnetic particles is presented.

Significance. If validated, the reconfigurable control could enable active manipulation in solid-state nanopore platforms, advancing applications in single-particle detection and biomolecular analysis by combining magnetic tweezing with sensing. The approach builds on standard electromagnetic principles but the current work remains conceptual with only qualitative evidence, so its significance is prospective rather than established.

major comments (2)

Abstract: The central claim that the specific nanopore geometry (ferromagnetic layer with hole) supports reversible switching between nearly uniform magnetization and flux-closure states under short field pulses is asserted as a design feature but lacks any supporting data such as hysteresis loops, MFM/MOKE images, or pulse-response measurements to confirm the states are reached, the switching is reversible, or the stray-field localization changes as required for capture/release.
Proof-of-concept demonstration: The selective trapping of fluorescent magnetic particles is shown qualitatively, but no quantitative metrics (e.g., trapping efficiency, required field amplitudes, error bars, or controls without the magnetic layer) are provided, preventing rigorous evaluation of the tweezing effect or the reconfigurability's practical utility.

minor comments (2)

Abstract: The keywords list 'vortex state' while the text refers to 'flux-closure state'; clarify whether these are synonymous in this context and ensure consistent terminology.
The manuscript would benefit from explicit fabrication parameters, nanopore dimensions, and material specifications to support reproducibility, even in a conceptual design paper.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and presentation of our work. Below we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [—] Abstract: The central claim that the specific nanopore geometry (ferromagnetic layer with hole) supports reversible switching between nearly uniform magnetization and flux-closure states under short field pulses is asserted as a design feature but lacks any supporting data such as hysteresis loops, MFM/MOKE images, or pulse-response measurements to confirm the states are reached, the switching is reversible, or the stray-field localization changes as required for capture/release.

Authors: The switching mechanism is supported by micromagnetic simulations detailed in the main text and supplementary information, which show the magnetization states, the effect of short field pulses, and the resulting stray field localization. We have revised the abstract to explicitly mention these simulation results and added a reference to the relevant figure. We agree that experimental validation using MFM or MOKE would further strengthen the claims; however, such measurements were outside the scope of this proof-of-concept study focused on particle trapping. We have added a note in the discussion section about planned future experimental characterization of the magnetic states. revision: partial
Referee: [—] Proof-of-concept demonstration: The selective trapping of fluorescent magnetic particles is shown qualitatively, but no quantitative metrics (e.g., trapping efficiency, required field amplitudes, error bars, or controls without the magnetic layer) are provided, preventing rigorous evaluation of the tweezing effect or the reconfigurability's practical utility.

Authors: We accept that the demonstration is qualitative. To address this, we have included the specific amplitudes of the magnetic field pulses used for switching and trapping in the revised methods and results sections. We have also added a discussion of control experiments conceptually (without the ferromagnetic layer, no localized fields are generated) and noted the limitations of the current qualitative data. However, we did not perform statistical analysis for trapping efficiency or include error bars, as the experiments were limited to demonstrating the on-demand capture and release. We believe this is appropriate for a proof-of-concept manuscript but have expanded the text to better contextualize the results. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental design with no derivations

full rationale

The paper describes an experimental magnetic nanopore architecture relying on standard electromagnetic principles and a proof-of-concept demonstration of particle trapping. No equations, derivations, parameter fittings, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the provided text. The reconfigurability claim is presented as a geometric design feature rather than a result derived from or equivalent to its own inputs. This matches the reader's assessment of minimal circularity and qualifies as a self-contained experimental report without any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on established electromagnetic principles for stray-field generation at magnetic discontinuities and standard nanofabrication assumptions; no new free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)

standard math Localized stray magnetic fields arise at geometric discontinuities in a ferromagnetic film under applied fields.
Invoked to explain the tweezing effect at the nanopore.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5555 in / 1177 out tokens · 50370 ms · 2026-05-12T00:51:36.836929+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

[1]

L. Xue, H. Yamazaki, R. Ren, M. Wanunu, A. P. Ivanov, J. B. Edel, Nat. Rev. Mater. 2020, 5, 931

work page 2020
[2]

Dekker, Nat

C. Dekker, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2007, 2, 209

work page 2007
[3]

W. Li, J. Zhou, N. Maccaferri, R. Krahne, K. Wang, D. Garoli, Anal. Chem. 2022, 94, 503

work page 2022
[4]

Li, L.-Q

Z.-Q. Li, L.-Q. Huang, K. Wang, X.-H. Xia, Acc. Mater. Res. 2024

work page 2024
[5]

Ivankin, R

A. Ivankin, R. Y. Henley, J. Larkin, S. Carson, M. L. Toscano, M. Wanunu, ACS Nano 2014, 8, 10774

work page 2014
[6]

Y.-L. Ying, Z. -L. Hu, S. Zhang, Y. Qing, A. Fragasso, G. Maglia, A. Meller, H. Bayley, C. Dekker, Y.-T. Long, Nat. Nanotechnol. 2022, 17, 1136

work page 2022
[7]

G. T. Solymosi, G. Jágerszki, L. Illés, P. Fürjes, R. E. Gyurcsányi, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 202519292

work page 2025
[8]

Y. He, M. Tsutsui, Y. Zhou, X. S. Miao, NPG Asia Mater. 2021, 13, 48

work page 2021
[9]

P. Xia, D. Satyabola, N. K. Bamrah, M. A. R. Laskar, A. Al Mamun, X. Zhou, G. B. M. Wisna, Y. Zhang, A. Ikbal, A. Kemeklis, A. E. Krylova, R. F. Hariadi, H. Yan, C. Wang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 202523998

work page 2025
[10]

K. Song, R. Gao, X. Pan, S. Yang, Z. Xue, C. Zhu, J. Wang, X.-H. Xia, Anal. Chem. 2026, 98, 1213

work page 2026
[11]

Lee, K.-B

K. Lee, K.-B. Park, H.-J. Kim, J.-S. Yu, H. Chae, H.-M. Kim, Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1704680

work page 2018
[12]

H. Liu, Q. Zhou, W. Wang, F. Fang, J. Zhang, Small 2023, 19, 2205680

work page 2023
[13]

Stuber, T

A. Stuber, T. Schlotter, J. Hengsteler, N. Nakatsuka, in Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol., Springer, 2024, 187, 283

work page 2024
[14]

J. Gao, Y. Wu, S. Yu, X. Zhou, Y. Li, W. Xie, S. Fang, R. Tian, Y. Yin, T. Weng, D. Zhou, Small 2025, 21, 2507736

work page 2025
[15]

R. Hu, X. Tong, Q. Zhao, Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2020, 9, 2000933

work page 2020
[16]

Rahman, M

M. Rahman, M. J. N. Sampad, A. Hawkins, H. Schmidt, Lab Chip 2021, 21, 3030

work page 2021
[17]

Tsutsui, W.-L

M. Tsutsui, W.-L. Hsu, D. Garoli, A. Douaki, Y. Komoto, H. Daiguji, T. Kawai, Nat. Commun. 2026, 17, 1496

work page 2026
[18]

A. J. Storm, J. H. Chen, X. S. Ling, H. W. Zandbergen, C. Dekker, Nat. Mater. 2003, 2, 537

work page 2003
[19]

H. Qian, R. F. Egerton, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2017, 111, 193106

work page 2017
[20]

J. P. Fried, J. L. Swett, B. P. Nadappuram, J. A. Mol, J. B. Edel, A. P. Ivanov, J. R. Yates, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2021, 50, 4974

work page 2021
[21]

Yanagi, R

I. Yanagi, R. Akahori, T. Hatano, T. Ken-ichi, Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 5000

work page 2014
[22]

J. Joby, Y. Marom, G. Lin, A. Baron-Wiechec, A. Meller, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2025, 202518770

work page 2025
[23]

Pérez -Mitta, M

G. Pérez -Mitta, M. E. Toimil -Molares, C. Trautmann, W. A. Marmisollé, O. Azzaroni, Adv. Mater. 2019, 31, 1901483

work page 2019
[24]

K. Wang, K. B. Crozier, ChemPhysChem 2012, 13, 2639

work page 2012
[25]

K. B. Crozier, ACS Photonics 2024, 11, 321

work page 2024
[26]

Chen, A.-T

K.-Y. Chen, A.-T. Lee, C.-C. Hung, J.-S. Huang, Y.-T. Yang, Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 4118

work page 2013
[27]

K. Wang, E. Schonbrun, P. Steinvurzel, K. B. Crozier, Nat. Commun. 2011, 2, 469

work page 2011
[28]

Garoli, H

D. Garoli, H. Yamazaki, N. Maccaferri, M. Wanunu, Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 7553

work page 2019
[29]

D. V. Verschueren, S. Pud, X. Shi, L. De Angelis, L. Kuipers, C. Dekker, ACS Nano 2019, 13, 61

work page 2019
[30]

F. K. Sarbisheh, K. Khabarov, M. Blanco Formoso, et al., Adv. Mater. 2025, 37, 2504436

work page 2025
[31]

J. A. Huang, M. Z. Mousavi, Y. Zhao, et al., Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5321

work page 2019
[32]

M. P. Jonsson, C. Dekker, Nano Lett. 2013, 13, 1029

work page 2013
[33]

C. R. Crick, P. Albella, B. Ng, A. P. Ivanov, T. Roschuk, M. P. Cecchini, F. Bresme, S. A. Maier, J. B. Edel, Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 553

work page 2015
[34]

Maccaferri, P

N. Maccaferri, P. Vavassori, D. Garoli, Appl. Phys. Lett. 2021, 118, 193102

work page 2021
[35]

T. Tan, Z. Wang, C. Zhao, W. Duan, H. Bai, N. Zhang, J. Feng, Nano Lett. 2025, 25, 12637

work page 2025
[36]

Montoncello, L

F. Montoncello, L. Giovannini, G. Nizzoli, et al., Phys. Rev. B 2008, 78, 104421

work page 2008
[37]

Vidamour et al., Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 485203

T. Vidamour et al., Nanotechnology 2022, 33, 485203

work page 2022
[38]

Vavassori, R

P. Vavassori, R. Bovolenta, V. Metlushko, B. Ilic, J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 99, 053902

work page 2006
[39]

R. D. McMichael, M. J. Donahue, IEEE Trans. Magn. 1997, 33, 4167

work page 1997
[40]

S. Jain, A. O. Adeyeye, IEEE Trans. Magn. 2010, 46, 1595

work page 2010
[41]

Neudecker, Magnetization Dynamics of Confined Ferromagnetic Systems, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg 2006

I. Neudecker, Magnetization Dynamics of Confined Ferromagnetic Systems, Universität Regensburg, Regensburg 2006

work page 2006
[42]

A. O. Adeyeye et al., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 6479

work page 2007
[43]

Lanzavecchia, J

G. Lanzavecchia, J. Kuttruff, A. Doricchi, A. Douaki, K. K. R. Ramankutty, I. García, L. Lin, A. Viejo Rodríguez, T. Wågberg, R. Krahne, N. Maccaferri, D. Garoli, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 230

work page 2023
[44]

Shin, I.-S

H.-J. Shin, I.-S. Park, Y. J. Jang, S. J. Wi, G. S. Lee, J. Ahn, Sens. Actuators A 2019, 295, 111538

work page 2019
[45]

Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, CRC Press (1997)

M. Madou, Fundamentals of Microfabrication, CRC Press (1997)

work page 1997
[46]

Y. Zou, H. Jin, Q. Ma, Z. Zheng, S. Weng, K. Kolataj, G. Acuna, I. Bald, D. Garoli, Nanoscale 2025, 17, 3656

work page 2025
[47]

Vansteenkiste, J

A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, F. Garcia-Sanchez, B. Van Waeyenberge, AIP Adv. 2014, 4, 107133

work page 2014