arxiv: 2605.08855 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.AR

Recognition: no theorem link

Low-Complexity Beamspace Channel Denoiser for mmWave Massive MIMO with Low-Resolution ADCs

Eunho Kim, Hanyoung Park, Ji-Woong Choi

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.AR

keywords beamspace channel estimationmmWave MIMOlow-resolution ADCschannel denoisinglow-complexity algorithmVLSI architecturesparse channels

0 comments

The pith

A beamspace denoiser derives a closed-form threshold from a composite noise model to match intensive methods at near-linear complexity for mmWave massive MIMO with low-resolution ADCs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a denoising algorithm for mmWave massive MIMO channels observed through low-resolution ADCs. It models the channel as sparse in the beamspace domain under a Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior and treats thermal noise plus quantization noise as a single composite noise source. From this, a closed-form threshold is derived for a simple hard-thresholding operation that separates signal and noise components. The approach avoids matrix inversions and iterations, resulting in near-linear complexity in the number of antennas. A VLSI architecture implemented on FPGA demonstrates reduced latency and hardware usage, making the method suitable for practical large-scale systems.

Core claim

The authors derive a hard-thresholding denoising rule for beamspace channel estimation where the decision threshold is obtained in closed form by jointly modeling thermal and quantization noises as composite noise, under the assumption of a Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior for the sparse channel coefficients. This replaces computationally heavy operations like matrix inversion or iterative optimization with a simple per-element comparison, achieving near-linear complexity scaling with the number of antennas while maintaining performance close to more complex algorithms.

What carries the argument

The composite noise model that combines thermal and quantization effects inside a Bayesian binary hypothesis test, yielding a closed-form threshold for hard-thresholding under the Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior.

Load-bearing premise

mmWave channels are sparse in the beamspace domain and the combined thermal plus quantization noise can be accurately captured by the composite model so that the closed-form threshold works without large modeling error.

What would settle it

Real mmWave channel measurements where sparsity fails or quantization noise deviates from the composite model, causing the proposed denoiser to fall below the performance of existing intensive algorithms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08855 by Eunho Kim, Hanyoung Park, Ji-Woong Choi.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Estimated D0 versus iterations. denoising, indicating that the proposed method is computationally more efficient. GL-QVBCE [23] has a complexity of O(NI (Lˆ3 + MLˆ2 )), where NI denotes the number of iterations and Lˆ is the estimated number of dominant propagation paths. Although mmWave channels are sparse and Lˆ is typically small, the normalized operation time is relatively high due to the large numbe… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Performance depending on SNR compared to baselines with 3-bit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: High-level architecture of the proposed algorithm in VLSI design; the yellow area (estimators for composite noise power, channel power, and SDNR) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Architecture of the composite noise power estimator. (a) sorting unit [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Architecture of the auxiliary estimators. (a) estimator units for average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Architecture details of the threshold calculation unit; the gray area represents the piecewise linear approximation of the logarithm. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Architecture details of denoising unit. coefficients for these approximations are also stored in LUTs, and the final threshold value η is then produced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

In this paper, we propose a low-complexity beamspace channel denoising algorithm for millimeter-wave (mmWave) massive multi-input multi-output (MIMO) systems with low-resolution analog-to-digital converters (ADCs). The proposed method exploits the inherent sparsity of mmWave channels in the beamspace domain and formulates the denoising problem as a Bayesian binary hypothesis testing under a Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior. To capture the distortion induced by low-resolution ADCs in a complexity-efficient manner, thermal noise and quantization noise are jointly modeled as a composite noise. Based on this modeling, a closed-form threshold value and a hard-thresholding-based denoising rule are derived to distinguish signal-dominant and noise-dominant components. The resulting algorithm avoids computationally intensive operations such as matrix inversion, iterative optimization, and parameter searching, and achieves near-linear computational complexity with respect to the number of antennas. Furthermore, a hardware-efficient very large-scale integration (VLSI) architecture is developed to enable practical deployment of the proposed algorithm, and is implemented on an AMD-Xilinx Kintex UltraScale+ KCU116 FPGA platform. The design incorporates hardware-aware simplifications and an efficient processing structure, leading to significantly lower latency and reduced hardware resource utilization compared to existing hardware implementations, along with sublinear scaling as the number of antennas increases. Extensive simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves performance comparable to computationally intensive existing approaches while significantly reducing computational complexity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a closed-form hard-threshold denoiser from a composite Gaussian noise model and backs it with an FPGA implementation, but the quantization approximation is the part that needs checking.

read the letter

The main thing to know is that this work turns beamspace channel denoising into a simple hard-thresholding rule by modeling thermal noise plus quantization noise as one Gaussian under a Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior on the sparse channel. That gives a closed-form threshold with near-linear complexity and no matrix work or iterations. They also built a VLSI architecture for it and ran it on a Kintex UltraScale+ FPGA, reporting lower latency, fewer resources, and sublinear scaling with antenna count. Those hardware numbers are concrete and address real power and speed constraints in mmWave massive MIMO with low-res ADCs. Simulations are said to match heavier existing methods, which is the practical payoff they emphasize. The modeling step is where it gets soft. For 1-3 bit ADCs the quantizer is nonlinear and signal-dependent, so the distortion is not additive Gaussian. Treating it as composite Gaussian keeps the math clean but can shift the threshold without a bound on the error. The abstract does not show how large that mismatch gets or how it affects the final performance gap. If the approximation holds only loosely, the claimed complexity-performance tradeoff is less solid than it reads. The sparsity assumption itself is standard and not the issue here. This is aimed at researchers and engineers who need low-power channel estimation hardware for mmWave systems. The combination of an explicit derivation, complexity claims, and actual FPGA results is enough to send it out for review. Referees should focus on whether the noise model error stays small across the tested bit widths and SNR ranges.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a low-complexity beamspace channel denoising algorithm for mmWave massive MIMO with low-resolution ADCs. It exploits channel sparsity via a Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior, jointly models thermal and quantization noise as composite Gaussian noise, derives a closed-form hard-thresholding rule from Bayesian hypothesis testing, and presents a VLSI architecture implemented on an AMD-Xilinx Kintex UltraScale+ KCU116 FPGA that achieves lower latency and resource usage with sublinear scaling in antenna count. Simulations claim performance comparable to more complex existing methods at near-linear complexity.

Significance. If the composite noise model and derived threshold are accurate, the approach provides a practical, hardware-efficient denoising solution that could enable real-time mmWave processing with power-efficient low-resolution ADCs. The FPGA implementation and complexity analysis are concrete strengths demonstrating deployability.

major comments (2)

[§III] §III (system model and threshold derivation): the closed-form hard-thresholding rule is obtained by treating thermal noise plus quantization noise as a single zero-mean complex Gaussian with variance equal to their sum. For 1-3 bit ADCs the quantization operation is a nonlinear, signal-dependent clipping/rounding whose output is neither Gaussian nor additive; the paper provides no error bound on the resulting threshold shift or on the deviation of the posterior from the assumed Bernoulli-Gaussian form. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the claimed near-optimal denoising performance and the complexity-performance tradeoff.
[Simulation Results] Simulation section (performance claims): the reported BER and NMSE curves compare the proposed denoiser only against other approximate methods; no ablation or comparison against an exact (non-Gaussian) quantization model is shown to quantify the modeling error's effect on the threshold or on the final channel estimate. Without this, it is unclear whether the “comparable performance” result survives when the composite-Gaussian assumption is relaxed.

minor comments (2)

[VLSI Architecture] The VLSI architecture description would benefit from an explicit table comparing LUT/FF/BRAM counts and latency against the referenced prior hardware implementations, rather than only qualitative statements.
[§III] Notation for the composite noise variance (e.g., σ²_c) should be introduced once and used consistently; several equations reuse σ² without clarifying whether it denotes thermal noise only or the composite variance.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of our modeling assumptions and the strength of our empirical validation. We address each major comment point by point below, indicating the revisions we will incorporate to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§III] §III (system model and threshold derivation): the closed-form hard-thresholding rule is obtained by treating thermal noise plus quantization noise as a single zero-mean complex Gaussian with variance equal to their sum. For 1-3 bit ADCs the quantization operation is a nonlinear, signal-dependent clipping/rounding whose output is neither Gaussian nor additive; the paper provides no error bound on the resulting threshold shift or on the deviation of the posterior from the assumed Bernoulli-Gaussian form. This modeling choice is load-bearing for the claimed near-optimal denoising performance and the complexity-performance tradeoff.

Authors: We acknowledge that the composite Gaussian model for thermal plus quantization noise is an approximation chosen to enable a closed-form hard-thresholding rule and near-linear complexity. For 1-3 bit ADCs, quantization is indeed nonlinear and signal-dependent. The manuscript does not derive an analytical error bound on the threshold shift or posterior deviation. In the revision, we will expand Section III with additional justification for the approximation (including citations to prior works analyzing its accuracy in quantized MIMO systems), a brief discussion of its limitations, and empirical validation of the threshold's sensitivity via Monte Carlo trials under the exact quantization function. This will clarify the modeling choice without altering the core algorithm. revision: yes
Referee: [Simulation Results] Simulation section (performance claims): the reported BER and NMSE curves compare the proposed denoiser only against other approximate methods; no ablation or comparison against an exact (non-Gaussian) quantization model is shown to quantify the modeling error's effect on the threshold or on the final channel estimate. Without this, it is unclear whether the “comparable performance” result survives when the composite-Gaussian assumption is relaxed.

Authors: We agree that direct comparison against an exact non-Gaussian quantization model would better quantify any performance degradation due to the approximation. The current simulations benchmark against other practical (approximate) methods to emphasize the complexity advantage. In the revised manuscript, we will add new simulation results that apply the denoiser to channels generated with the true nonlinear ADC quantization function and compare the resulting NMSE and BER curves against those obtained under the composite Gaussian model. This ablation will explicitly measure the modeling error's impact while preserving the paper's focus on low-complexity implementation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained from stated priors and models

full rationale

The paper formulates beamspace denoising as Bayesian binary hypothesis testing under an explicit Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior, jointly models thermal plus quantization noise as composite Gaussian, and derives a closed-form hard-thresholding rule directly from that model. No equations reduce to fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The VLSI architecture is a direct hardware mapping of the derived rule rather than an independent claim. The composite-noise modeling choice is an assumption whose accuracy is a correctness issue, not a circularity reduction. The central performance claims therefore rest on independent derivation steps rather than tautological re-use of inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach depends on the domain assumption of channel sparsity in beamspace and the validity of the Bernoulli-complex Gaussian prior and composite noise model.

axioms (2)

domain assumption mmWave channels are sparse in the beamspace domain
Exploits inherent sparsity as stated in abstract.
domain assumption Thermal and quantization noise can be jointly modeled as a composite noise
To capture distortion in complexity-efficient manner.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5559 in / 1412 out tokens · 60157 ms · 2026-05-12T02:09:09.949237+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Low-Complexity Blind SNR Estimator for mmWave Multi-Antenna Communications
eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

A sorting-based single-sample blind estimator separates noise and signal in beamspace using order statistics to compute average noise power, signal power, and SNR in mmWave multi-antenna systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

73 extracted references · 73 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

6G Spectrum - Enabling the Future Mobile Life Beyond 2030,

Ericsson, “6G Spectrum - Enabling the Future Mobile Life Beyond 2030,” Ericsson, White Paper, 2024

work page 2030
[2]

Toward 6G Networks: Use Cases and Technologies,

M. Giordani, M. Polese, M. Mezzavilla, S. Rangan, and M. Zorzi, “Toward 6G Networks: Use Cases and Technologies,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 55–61, 2020

work page 2020
[3]

Ericsson Mobility Report: Q4 2025 Update,

Ericsson, “Ericsson Mobility Report: Q4 2025 Update,” Tech. Rep., Nov. 2025, [Online] https://www.ericsson.com/en/mobility-report

work page 2025
[4]

T. S. Rappaport, R. W. H. Jr., R. C. Daniels, and J. N. Murdock, Millimeter Wave Wireless Communications. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall, 2015

work page 2015
[5]

Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work!

T. S. Rappaport, S. Sun, R. Mayzus, H. Zhao, Y . Azar, K. Wang, G. N. Wong, J. K. Schulz, M. Samimi, and F. Gutierrez, “Millimeter Wave Mobile Communications for 5G Cellular: It Will Work!”IEEE Access, vol. 1, pp. 335–349, 2013

work page 2013
[6]

Low-Complexity Blind Estimator of SNR and MSE for mmWave Multi-Antenna Communications,

H. Park and J.-W. Choi, “Low-Complexity Blind Estimator of SNR and MSE for mmWave Multi-Antenna Communications,” in2025 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), 2025, pp. 1–6

work page 2025
[7]

Millimeter-wave massive MIMO: the next wireless revolution?

A. L. Swindlehurst, E. Ayanoglu, P. Heydari, and F. Capolino, “Millimeter-wave massive MIMO: the next wireless revolution?”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 56–62, 2014

work page 2014
[8]

PARAMOUNT: Toward generalizable deep learning for mmWave beam selection using sub-6 GHz channel measurements,

K. Vuckovic, M. B. Mashhadi, F. Hejazi, N. Rahnavard, and A. Alkha- teeb, “PARAMOUNT: Toward generalizable deep learning for mmWave beam selection using sub-6 GHz channel measurements,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 5187–5202, 2024

work page 2024
[9]

Low-Complexity Two- Timescale Hybrid Precoding for mmWave Massive MIMO: A Group- and-Codebook Based Approach,

B. Lin, A. Liu, M. Lei, and H. Zhou, “Low-Complexity Two- Timescale Hybrid Precoding for mmWave Massive MIMO: A Group- and-Codebook Based Approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7263–7277, 2024

work page 2024
[10]

Joint Design of Equalization and Beamforming for Single-Carrier MIMO Transmission Over Millimeter-Wave and Sub-Terahertz Channels,

S. Uchimura, K. Ando, G. T. F. de Abreu, and K. Ishibashi, “Joint Design of Equalization and Beamforming for Single-Carrier MIMO Transmission Over Millimeter-Wave and Sub-Terahertz Channels,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1978–1991, 2025

work page 1978
[11]

Queue-Aware Optimization-Based Scheduling for mmWave Multi-User MIMO Indoor Small Cell,

H. Park and J.-W. Choi, “Queue-Aware Optimization-Based Scheduling for mmWave Multi-User MIMO Indoor Small Cell,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 2303–2307, 2025

work page 2025
[12]

Combating the Distance Problem in the Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Frequency Bands,

I. F. Akyildiz, C. Han, and S. Nie, “Combating the Distance Problem in the Millimeter Wave and Terahertz Frequency Bands,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 102–108, 2018

work page 2018
[13]

An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems,

R. W. Heath, N. Gonz ´alez-Prelcic, S. Rangan, W. Roh, and A. M. Sayeed, “An Overview of Signal Processing Techniques for Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 436–453, 2016

work page 2016
[14]

Low power analog-to-digital conversion in millimeter wave systems: Impact of resolution and band- width on performance,

O. Orhan, E. Erkip, and S. Rangan, “Low power analog-to-digital conversion in millimeter wave systems: Impact of resolution and band- width on performance,” in2015 Information Theory and Applications Workshop (ITA), 2015, pp. 191–198

work page 2015
[15]

On Low-Resolution ADCs in Practical 5G Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems,

J. Zhang, L. Dai, X. Li, Y . Liu, and L. Hanzo, “On Low-Resolution ADCs in Practical 5G Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 56, no. 7, pp. 205–211, 2018

work page 2018
[16]

Near Maximum-Likelihood Detector and Channel Estimator for Uplink Multiuser Massive MIMO Systems With One-Bit ADCs,

J. Choi, J. Mo, and R. W. Heath, “Near Maximum-Likelihood Detector and Channel Estimator for Uplink Multiuser Massive MIMO Systems With One-Bit ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 2005– 2018, 2016

work page 2005
[17]

Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Based on Quantized Matrix Recovery,

X. Huang, S. Bi, and B. Liao, “Direction-of-Arrival Estimation Based on Quantized Matrix Recovery,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 349–353, 2020

work page 2020
[18]

Computationally Efficient Maximum Likelihood Channel Estimation for Coarsely Quantized Mas- sive MIMO Systems,

F. Liu, X. Shang, Y . Cheng, and G. Zhang, “Computationally Efficient Maximum Likelihood Channel Estimation for Coarsely Quantized Mas- sive MIMO Systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 444–448, 2022

work page 2022
[19]

Feedback-controlled Channel Estimation with Low-resolution Adcs in Multiuser Mimo Systems,

R. P. David and J. Cal-Braz, “Feedback-controlled Channel Estimation with Low-resolution Adcs in Multiuser Mimo Systems,” inICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), 2019, pp. 4674–4678

work page 2019
[20]

Variational Bayes’ Joint Channel Estimation and Soft Symbol Decoding for Uplink Massive MIMO Systems With Low Resolution ADCs,

S. S. Thoota and C. R. Murthy, “Variational Bayes’ Joint Channel Estimation and Soft Symbol Decoding for Uplink Massive MIMO Systems With Low Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 5, pp. 3467–3481, 2021

work page 2021
[21]

Joint Channel- Estimation/Decoding With Frequency-Selective Channels and Few-Bit ADCs,

P. Sun, Z. Wang, R. W. Heather, and P. Schniter, “Joint Channel- Estimation/Decoding With Frequency-Selective Channels and Few-Bit ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 899–914, 2019

work page 2019
[22]

A Generalized V AMP-Based Channel Estimator for Uplink 15 Quantized Massive MIMO Systems,

Y . Xiong, “A Generalized V AMP-Based Channel Estimator for Uplink 15 Quantized Massive MIMO Systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 6838–6842, 2020

work page 2020
[23]

Grid-Less Variational Bayesian Channel Estimation for Antenna Array Systems With Low Resolution ADCs,

J. Zhu, C.-K. Wen, J. Tong, C. Xu, and S. Jin, “Grid-Less Variational Bayesian Channel Estimation for Antenna Array Systems With Low Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 1549–1562, 2020

work page 2020
[24]

Spatial Wideband Channel Estimation for mmWave Massive MIMO Systems With Hybrid Architectures and Low- Resolution ADCs,

I.-S. Kim and J. Choi, “Spatial Wideband Channel Estimation for mmWave Massive MIMO Systems With Hybrid Architectures and Low- Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 4016–4029, 2021

work page 2021
[25]

Robust Predictive Quantization: Analysis and Design Via Convex Optimization,

A. K. Fletcher, S. Rangan, V . K. Goyal, and K. Ramchandran, “Robust Predictive Quantization: Analysis and Design Via Convex Optimization,” IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 618–632, 2007

work page 2007
[26]

Crosscorrelation Functions of Amplitude-Distorted Gaussian Signals,

J. J. Bussgang, “Crosscorrelation Functions of Amplitude-Distorted Gaussian Signals,” Research Lab. Electronics, Massachusetts Inst. Technology, Cambridge, MA, Tech. Rep. 216, 1952. [Online]. Available: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/4847

work page 1952
[27]

Energy Efficiency of Massive MIMO Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs and Successive Interference Cancellation,

T. Liu, J. Tong, Q. Guo, J. Xi, Y . Yu, and Z. Xiao, “Energy Efficiency of Massive MIMO Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs and Successive Interference Cancellation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 3987–4002, 2019

work page 2019
[28]

Performance Analysis of Mas- sive MIMO Multi-Way Relay Networks With Low-Resolution ADCs,

S. Rahimian, Y . Jing, and M. Ardakani, “Performance Analysis of Mas- sive MIMO Multi-Way Relay Networks With Low-Resolution ADCs,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 5794–5806, 2020

work page 2020
[29]

Channel Tracking and AoA Acquisition in Quantized Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems,

W. Fan, Y . Xia, C. Li, and Y . Huang, “Channel Tracking and AoA Acquisition in Quantized Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 7, pp. 9252–9266, 2023

work page 2023
[30]

User Scheduling for Millimeter Wave Hybrid Beamforming Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs,

J. Choi, G. Lee, and B. L. Evans, “User Scheduling for Millimeter Wave Hybrid Beamforming Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 2401–2414, 2019

work page 2019
[31]

Channel Estimation and Performance Analysis of One-Bit Massive MIMO Systems,

Y . Li, C. Tao, G. Seco-Granados, A. Mezghani, A. L. Swindlehurst, and L. Liu, “Channel Estimation and Performance Analysis of One-Bit Massive MIMO Systems,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 65, no. 15, pp. 4075–4089, 2017

work page 2017
[32]

Throughput Analysis of Massive MIMO Uplink With Low-Resolution ADCs,

S. Jacobsson, G. Durisi, M. Coldrey, U. Gustavsson, and C. Studer, “Throughput Analysis of Massive MIMO Uplink With Low-Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 4038–4051, 2017

work page 2017
[33]

Concatenated MMSE Estimation for Quantized OFDM Systems,

H. Lee, Y .-S. Jeon, H. Do, and N. Lee, “Concatenated MMSE Estimation for Quantized OFDM Systems,” inICC 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2019, pp. 1–6

work page 2019
[34]

Channel Estimation in Broadband Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems With Few-Bit ADCs,

J. Mo, P. Schniter, and R. W. Heath, “Channel Estimation in Broadband Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems With Few-Bit ADCs,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 5, pp. 1141–1154, 2018

work page 2018
[35]

Massive MIMO Channel Estimation With Low-Resolution Spa- tial Sigma-Delta ADCs,

S. Rao, G. Seco-Granados, H. Pirzadeh, J. A. Nossek, and A. L. Swindle- hurst, “Massive MIMO Channel Estimation With Low-Resolution Spa- tial Sigma-Delta ADCs,”IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 109 320–109 334, 2021

work page 2021
[36]

Sparsity-Adaptive Beamspace Channel Estimation for 1-Bit mmWave Massive MIMO Systems,

A. Gallyas-Sanhueza, S. H. Mirfarshbafan, R. Ghods, and C. Studer, “Sparsity-Adaptive Beamspace Channel Estimation for 1-Bit mmWave Massive MIMO Systems,” in2020 IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2020, pp. 1–5

work page 2020
[37]

Channel Estimation in Sub-6 GHz and Hybrid Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems With Low- Resolution ADCs,

B. Srinivas, P. Priya, D. Sen, and S. Chakrabarti, “Channel Estimation in Sub-6 GHz and Hybrid Millimeter Wave MIMO Systems With Low- Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 707–723, 2023

work page 2023
[38]

Cross-Domain Joint Channel and Data Estimation for mmWave MIMO-OFDM Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs,

K. Ito, T. Takahashi, K. Ishibashi, S. Ibi, and H. Ochiai, “Cross-Domain Joint Channel and Data Estimation for mmWave MIMO-OFDM Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1009–1025, 2025

work page 2025
[39]

Linear and Nonlinear MMSE Estimation in One-Bit Quantized Systems Under a Gaussian Mixture Prior,

B. Fesl and W. Utschick, “Linear and Nonlinear MMSE Estimation in One-Bit Quantized Systems Under a Gaussian Mixture Prior,”IEEE Signal Process. Lett., vol. 32, pp. 361–365, 2025

work page 2025
[40]

Deep Learning Based Channel Estimation for Massive MIMO With Mixed-Resolution ADCs,

S. Gao, P. Dong, Z. Pan, and G. Y . Li, “Deep Learning Based Channel Estimation for Massive MIMO With Mixed-Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 1989–1993, 2019

work page 1989
[41]

Deep Learning for Massive MIMO With 1-Bit ADCs: When More Antennas Need Fewer Pilots,

Y . Zhang, M. Alrabeiah, and A. Alkhateeb, “Deep Learning for Massive MIMO With 1-Bit ADCs: When More Antennas Need Fewer Pilots,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 9, no. 8, pp. 1273–1277, 2020

work page 2020
[42]

Channel Estimation for One-Bit Multiuser Massive MIMO Using Conditional GAN,

Y . Dong, H. Wang, and Y .-D. Yao, “Channel Estimation for One-Bit Multiuser Massive MIMO Using Conditional GAN,”IEEE Communi- cations Letters, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 854–858, 2021

work page 2021
[43]

Learning a Low- Complexity Channel Estimator for One-Bit Quantization,

B. Fesl, M. Koller, N. Turan, and W. Utschick, “Learning a Low- Complexity Channel Estimator for One-Bit Quantization,” in2020 54th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2020, pp. 393–397

work page 2020
[44]

High Dimensional Channel Estimation Using Deep Generative Networks,

E. Balevi, A. Doshi, A. Jalal, A. Dimakis, and J. G. Andrews, “High Dimensional Channel Estimation Using Deep Generative Networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 18–30, 2021

work page 2021
[45]

Dual-Driven Learning for Channel Estimation of Massive MIMO Systems With One- Bit ADCs,

H. Li, S. Wu, S. Zheng, C. Jiang, H. Yang, and W. Zhang, “Dual-Driven Learning for Channel Estimation of Massive MIMO Systems With One- Bit ADCs,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1108–1112, 2024

work page 2024
[46]

Channel Estimation for Quantized Systems Based on Conditionally Gaussian Latent Models,

B. Fesl, N. Turan, B. B ¨ock, and W. Utschick, “Channel Estimation for Quantized Systems Based on Conditionally Gaussian Latent Models,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 72, pp. 1475–1490, 2024

work page 2024
[47]

Channel Estimation for One-Bit Multiuser Massive MIMO Using Conditional GAN,

Y . Dong, H. Wang, and Y .-D. Yao, “Channel Estimation for One-Bit Multiuser Massive MIMO Using Conditional GAN,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 854–858, 2021

work page 2021
[48]

Channel Estimation for mmWave mMIMO Systems With Mixed-ADC: Conditional Generative Adversar- ial Network and Deep Transfer Learning,

L. Wang, L. Ge, C. Qi, and G. Chen, “Channel Estimation for mmWave mMIMO Systems With Mixed-ADC: Conditional Generative Adversar- ial Network and Deep Transfer Learning,”IEEE Transactions on Green Communications and Networking, vol. 10, pp. 2206–2219, 2026

work page 2026
[49]

Channel Estimation for mmWave mMIMO Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs Based on Adaptive Quantization Improved CGAN,

S. Niu, L. Wang, L. Ge, and J. Tong, “Channel Estimation for mmWave mMIMO Systems With Low-Resolution ADCs Based on Adaptive Quantization Improved CGAN,”IEEE Transactions on Green Commu- nications and Networking, vol. 10, pp. 859–868, 2026

work page 2026
[50]

Stabilizing GANs for Wireless AI: ReRpGAN-Enabled Robust Channel Estimation for One-Bit Massive MIMO,

J. Shen, Z. Lin, R. Ma, S. Sun, K. An, C. Han, Y . Sun, and D. Niyato, “Stabilizing GANs for Wireless AI: ReRpGAN-Enabled Robust Channel Estimation for One-Bit Massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Commun., pp. 1– 1, 2026

work page 2026
[51]

Low-Resolution Massive MIMO Channel Estimation With LSTM Attention-Based CBDNet,

I. Helmy and W. Choi, “Low-Resolution Massive MIMO Channel Estimation With LSTM Attention-Based CBDNet,”IEEE Trans. Mobile Comput., vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1531–1546, 2026

work page 2026
[52]

Self-Supervised Learning Enhanced Channel Estimation in Massive MIMO System With Low- Resolution ADCs,

G. Liu, Y . Cao, T. Ohtsuki, and T. Q. S. Quek, “Self-Supervised Learning Enhanced Channel Estimation in Massive MIMO System With Low- Resolution ADCs,”IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 2209–2213, 2025

work page 2025
[53]

Generative Diffusion Models for High Dimensional Channel Estimation,

X. Zhou, L. Liang, J. Zhang, P. Jiang, Y . Li, and S. Jin, “Generative Diffusion Models for High Dimensional Channel Estimation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 5840–5854, 2025

work page 2025
[54]

Beamspace Channel Estimation for Wideband Millimeter-Wave MIMO: A Model- Driven Unsupervised Learning Approach,

H. He, R. Wang, W. Jin, S. Jin, C.-K. Wen, and G. Y . Li, “Beamspace Channel Estimation for Wideband Millimeter-Wave MIMO: A Model- Driven Unsupervised Learning Approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Com- mun., vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 1808–1822, 2023

work page 2023
[55]

Mapping channel estimation and MIMO detection in LTE-advanced on a reconfigurable cell array,

C. Zhang, L. Liu, and V . ¨Owall, “Mapping channel estimation and MIMO detection in LTE-advanced on a reconfigurable cell array,” in 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2012, pp. 1799–1802

work page 2012
[56]

VLSI Designs for Joint Channel Estimation and Data Detection in Large SIMO Wireless Sys- tems,

O. Casta ˜neda, T. Goldstein, and C. Studer, “VLSI Designs for Joint Channel Estimation and Data Detection in Large SIMO Wireless Sys- tems,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1120–1132, 2018

work page 2018
[57]

Channel Estimation for Advanced 5G/6G Use Cases on a Vector Digital Signal Processor,

S. A. Damjancevic, E. Matus, D. Utyansky, P. van der Wolf, and G. P. Fettweis, “Channel Estimation for Advanced 5G/6G Use Cases on a Vector Digital Signal Processor,”IEEE Open J. Circuits Syst., vol. 2, pp. 265–277, 2021

work page 2021
[58]

Channel Estimation Using Deep Learning on an FPGA for 5G Millimeter-Wave Communication Systems,

P. K. Chundi, X. Wang, and M. Seok, “Channel Estimation Using Deep Learning on an FPGA for 5G Millimeter-Wave Communication Systems,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 908–918, 2022

work page 2022
[59]

Beamspace Channel Estimation for Massive MIMO mmWave Systems: Algorithm and VLSI Design,

S. H. Mirfarshbafan, A. Gallyas-Sanhueza, R. Ghods, and C. Studer, “Beamspace Channel Estimation for Massive MIMO mmWave Systems: Algorithm and VLSI Design,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 67, no. 12, pp. 5482–5495, 2020

work page 2020
[60]

Efficient Channel Estimator With Angle-Division Multiple Access,

X. Liu, J. Sha, H. Xie, F. Gao, S. Jin, Z. Zhang, X. You, and C. Zhang, “Efficient Channel Estimator With Angle-Division Multiple Access,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 708–718, 2019

work page 2019
[61]

A DSP-Purposed REconfigurable Acceleration Machine (DREAM) for High Energy Efficiency MIMO Signal Processing,

Y . Fu, K. Chen, W. Song, G. He, S. Shen, H. Wang, C. Zhang, and L. Li, “A DSP-Purposed REconfigurable Acceleration Machine (DREAM) for High Energy Efficiency MIMO Signal Processing,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 952–965, 2023

work page 2023
[62]

Synchronization and Channel Estimation Design for Multi-Stream MIMO System in Sub-Terahertz Channel Model,

C.-L. Tu, C.-Y . Tseng, W.-C. Lee, K.-L. Chiu, P.-Y . Tsai, and S.-J. Jou, “Synchronization and Channel Estimation Design for Multi-Stream MIMO System in Sub-Terahertz Channel Model,”IEEE Open J. Circuits Syst., vol. 6, pp. 14–25, 2025

work page 2025
[63]

A RISC-V Domain-Specific Processor for Deep Learning-Based Channel Estimation,

M. Guo, Q. Wu, C. Wang, Y . Zhou, S. Wang, C. Zhang, Z. Wang, and J. Lin, “A RISC-V Domain-Specific Processor for Deep Learning-Based Channel Estimation,”IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 2380–2393, 2025

work page 2025
[64]

The Bussgang Decomposition of Non- linear Systems: Basic Theory and MIMO Extensions,

O. T. Demir and E. Bjornson, “The Bussgang Decomposition of Non- linear Systems: Basic Theory and MIMO Extensions,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 131–136, 2021. 16

work page 2021
[65]

Binary Hypothesis Testing-Based Low- Complexity Beamspace Channel Estimation for mmWave Massive MIMO Systems,

H. Park and J.-W. Choi, “Binary Hypothesis Testing-Based Low- Complexity Beamspace Channel Estimation for mmWave Massive MIMO Systems,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.01007, 2025

work page arXiv 2025
[66]

Beam-Delay Domain Channel Estimation for mmWave XL-MIMO Systems,

H. Hou, X. He, T. Fang, X. Yi, W. Wang, and S. Jin, “Beam-Delay Domain Channel Estimation for mmWave XL-MIMO Systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 646–661, 2024

work page 2024
[67]

Iterative Channel Estimation Using LSE and Sparse Message Passing for MmWave MIMO Systems,

C. Huang, L. Liu, C. Yuen, and S. Sun, “Iterative Channel Estimation Using LSE and Sparse Message Passing for MmWave MIMO Systems,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 245–259, 2019

work page 2019
[68]

Low-Complexity Blind Parameter Estimation in Wireless Systems with Noisy Sparse Signals,

A. Gallyas-Sanhueza and C. Studer, “Low-Complexity Blind Parameter Estimation in Wireless Systems with Noisy Sparse Signals,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 7055–7071, 2023

work page 2023
[69]

Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter,

P. J. Huber, “Robust Estimation of a Location Parameter,”The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 73–101, March 1964

work page 1964
[70]

Time Bounds for Selection,

M. Blum, R. W. Floyd, V . Pratt, R. L. Rivest, and R. E. Tarjan, “Time Bounds for Selection,”J. Comput. Syst. Sci., vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 448–461, 1973

work page 1973
[71]

Quantizing for minimum distortion,

G. Roe, “Quantizing for minimum distortion,”IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 384–385, 1964

work page 1964
[72]

QuaDRiGa: A 3- D Multi-Cell Channel Model With Time Evolution for Enabling Virtual Field Trials,

S. Jaeckel, L. Raschkowski, K. B ¨orner, and L. Thiele, “QuaDRiGa: A 3- D Multi-Cell Channel Model With Time Evolution for Enabling Virtual Field Trials,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 3242– 3256, 2014

work page 2014
[73]

Real-Time mmWave Channel Sounding Through Switched Beamforming With 3-D Dual-Polarized Phased-Array Antennas,

D. Caudill, J. Chuang, S. Y . Jun, C. Gentile, and N. Golmie, “Real-Time mmWave Channel Sounding Through Switched Beamforming With 3-D Dual-Polarized Phased-Array Antennas,”IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 5021–5032, 2021

work page 2021