arxiv: 2605.08907 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: no theorem link

The Status of Gravitational Vector Perturbations with Recent CMB Data

Ali Rida Khalife, Cyril Pitrou

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO

keywords modesmathcaldatamathrmmodeincludingperturbationswhen

0 comments

The pith

Recent CMB data place upper limits as tight as 1.3×10^{-4} on gravitational vector perturbations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines recent Cosmic Microwave Background data to constrain gravitational vector perturbations, which represent twisting motions in the primordial plasma. It tests three possible initial conditions for these modes and uses temperature, E-polarization, and B-polarization measurements from multiple telescopes. The resulting upper limits are very stringent for some sources and looser for others, with no clear detection of any vector signal. A reader cares because these perturbations could contaminate B-mode signals thought to come from primordial gravitational waves. The work shows vector modes are small but not ruled out, so they should be considered in future analyses.

Core claim

The central claim is that combining data from SPT-3G, ACT-DR6, Planck, BICEP/Keck, and SPTpol gives 95% CL upper limits r_v < 1.3×10^{-4} (ISO), r_v < 6.8 (OCT), and r_v < 4.2 (SMD) at k_p = 0.05 Mpc^{-1}, with slightly tighter bounds when tensors are added. For the SMD case without tensors, SPTpol B-modes alone give r_v = 4.7 ± 2.1 at 2.2 sigma, but overall the data are consistent with no vector modes. The paper concludes that vector modes are not fully excluded by current B-mode data and must be kept in mind when interpreting primordial signals.

What carries the argument

The vector-to-scalar ratio r_v at the pivot scale, computed for three initial conditions (neutrino isocurvature ISO, neutrino octupole OCT, and sourced mode SMD from pre-equality anisotropic stress), and constrained by their predicted contributions to CMB power spectra.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes the three initial conditions cover the relevant generation mechanisms for vector modes and that B-mode data systematics do not produce false vector signals.

What would settle it

Observation of B-mode polarization power spectra exceeding the levels implied by r_v = 1.3×10^{-4} for isocurvature initial conditions at greater than 3 sigma would falsify the current constraints.

read the original abstract

We present new constraints on gravitational vector perturbations ($\mathcal{V}$-modes) using Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data, including temperature and $E$-mode polarization from SPT-3G D1, ACT-DR6, and $Planck$, as well as $B$-mode data from BICEP/Keck and SPTpol, which provide the strongest constraints on $\mathcal{V}$-modes. We consider three initial conditions (ICs) that source $\mathcal{V}$-modes: neutrino isocurvature (ISO), neutrino octupole (OCT), and a sourced mode (SMD) generated by an anisotropic stress before matter-radiation equality. We also consider including tensor modes along with $\mathcal{V}$-modes for each of these ICs. Combining all datasets, we obtain 95\% confidence level upper limits of $r_\mathrm{v} < 1.3\times10^{-4}$ (ISO), $r_\mathrm{v} < 6.8$ (OCT), and $r_\mathrm{v} < 4.2$ (SMD), with slightly tighter bounds when tensors are included, at a pivot scale $k_p\ =\ 0.05$ Mpc$^{-1}$. Interestingly, for SMD without tensors, using SPTpol $B$-modes alone yields $r_\mathrm{v} = 4.7 \pm 2.1$, consistent with zero at $2.2\sigma$. Similar result is found for SMD when including tensor perturbations. No statistically significant deviation from $\Lambda$CDM is found. However, $\mathcal{V}$-modes are not fully excluded by current $B$-mode data and should be considered when interpreting primordial signals.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper tightens bounds on vector modes with fresh CMB data but the 2.2-sigma hint is too marginal and potentially systematics-driven to matter much.

read the letter

Hey, I checked out this paper on the status of gravitational vector perturbations with recent CMB data. The core finding is that combining the latest datasets gives r_v upper limits of 1.3e-4 for the ISO case, 6.8 for OCT, and 4.2 for SMD at 95% CL, with a marginal 2.2 sigma bump in the SMD case from SPTpol B-modes alone that they correctly flag as consistent with zero. They do a good job pulling in temperature and E-modes from SPT-3G D1, ACT-DR6, and Planck, plus B-modes from BICEP/Keck and SPTpol. Considering the three initial conditions and running cases with and without tensors adds some robustness. The results are presented in a straightforward way with the pivot scale noted. The soft spots are around the SPTpol data. Since vector modes affect B-modes, any leftover systematics there could fake a signal at that level, and the paper doesn't seem to test alternative templates or splits to check. The choice of those three ICs is fine but it's an assumption that they cover the main possibilities; other mechanisms might exist. This paper is for people who follow constraints on non-scalar perturbations or who model early universe sources of vectors. It won't change how most people do cosmology but it's a solid incremental update. I'd put it through peer review. The claims are measured and the data combination is worth checking.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports new constraints on gravitational vector perturbations (V-modes) using CMB temperature and E-mode data from SPT-3G D1, ACT-DR6, and Planck, together with B-mode data from BICEP/Keck and SPTpol. Three initial conditions are considered for sourcing V-modes: neutrino isocurvature (ISO), neutrino octupole (OCT), and a sourced anisotropic-stress mode (SMD). Combining all datasets yields 95% CL upper limits r_v < 1.3×10^{-4} (ISO), r_v < 6.8 (OCT), and r_v < 4.2 (SMD) at the pivot scale k_p = 0.05 Mpc^{-1}, with modestly tighter bounds when tensor modes are included simultaneously. A marginal 2.2σ preference for non-zero r_v appears in the SMD case from SPTpol B-modes alone (r_v = 4.7 ± 2.1), but the combined analysis finds no statistically significant deviation from ΛCDM. The authors conclude that V-modes remain relevant for interpreting future primordial B-mode signals.

Significance. If the analysis holds, the work supplies updated, observationally grounded bounds on vector-mode amplitudes that can be used to test early-universe scenarios involving neutrino isocurvature or pre-equality anisotropic stress. The tight ISO limit is especially useful, and the joint treatment of vectors plus tensors adds value. The marginal SPTpol hint illustrates the sensitivity of current B-mode data and the need for continued scrutiny of systematics. The paper thereby contributes a concrete reference point for model-building and data-interpretation pipelines that must now account for possible vector contributions.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The reported 95% CL limits rest on the premise that the three chosen initial conditions (ISO, OCT, SMD) exhaust the relevant linear vector-mode sources at k_p = 0.05 Mpc^{-1}. The manuscript provides no derivation or reference demonstrating that other possible sources (e.g., vector fields, modified gravity, or higher-order stress tensors) are either absent or sub-dominant; this assumption is load-bearing for the generality of the quoted bounds.
[Abstract] Abstract: For the SMD case the SPTpol-only posterior yields r_v = 4.7 ± 2.1 (2.2σ). Because vector modes source B-modes directly, any unmodeled leakage or foreground residual at the few-μK level can shift the posterior by O(1). The paper does not quantify how the combined limits change under alternative SPTpol systematic templates or data splits, leaving open the possibility that the marginal hint is spurious.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that bounds become 'slightly tighter' when tensors are included but does not specify whether this holds for all three ICs or only a subset; a one-sentence clarification would improve readability.
[Abstract] The pivot scale k_p = 0.05 Mpc^{-1} is given without explicit motivation relative to the conventional scalar pivot; a brief parenthetical note would aid readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications on the scope of our analysis and noting revisions made to improve the manuscript. The work focuses on specific, representative initial conditions for vector modes, and the combined dataset shows no significant detection.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The reported 95% CL limits rest on the premise that the three chosen initial conditions (ISO, OCT, SMD) exhaust the relevant linear vector-mode sources at k_p = 0.05 Mpc^{-1}. The manuscript provides no derivation or reference demonstrating that other possible sources (e.g., vector fields, modified gravity, or higher-order stress tensors) are either absent or sub-dominant; this assumption is load-bearing for the generality of the quoted bounds.

Authors: We agree that the bounds are derived specifically for the three initial conditions (ISO, OCT, SMD) considered in the analysis. These were selected as they represent standard, physically motivated sources of vector perturbations discussed in the existing literature on neutrino isocurvature and pre-equality anisotropic stress. We do not claim or demonstrate that these exhaust all possible linear vector-mode sources, such as those arising from vector fields or modified gravity. The quoted 95% CL limits therefore apply to the models we have analyzed. To clarify the scope, we have revised the abstract to state that the constraints are for the considered initial conditions and have added references to prior vector-mode studies in the introduction. This constitutes a partial revision, as the core results and methodology are unchanged. revision: partial
Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: For the SMD case the SPTpol-only posterior yields r_v = 4.7 ± 2.1 (2.2σ). Because vector modes source B-modes directly, any unmodeled leakage or foreground residual at the few-μK level can shift the posterior by O(1). The paper does not quantify how the combined limits change under alternative SPTpol systematic templates or data splits, leaving open the possibility that the marginal hint is spurious.

Authors: We acknowledge that the marginal 2.2σ preference for non-zero r_v in the SPTpol-only SMD analysis could be influenced by unmodeled systematics, given the direct sourcing of B-modes by vector modes. The manuscript already reports that this preference is not statistically significant in the full combined dataset (which includes SPT-3G, ACT-DR6, Planck, and BICEP/Keck), yielding no deviation from ΛCDM. However, we did not perform additional runs with alternative SPTpol systematic templates or data splits. We have added a discussion in the results section noting this limitation and the need for caution in interpreting marginal signals from individual datasets. The combined constraints remain the primary result. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved

Quantification of how the combined limits change under alternative SPTpol systematic templates or data splits for the SMD case.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in data-driven constraints

full rationale

The paper reports 95% CL upper limits on the vector-mode amplitude r_v by performing standard likelihood fits of three specified initial conditions (ISO, OCT, SMD) to external CMB temperature, E-mode, and B-mode datasets. These limits are direct observational posteriors; r_v is a free amplitude parameter whose posterior is not forced to equal any input by construction. The derivation chain consists of standard Boltzmann evolution plus likelihood evaluation against independent maps, with no self-definitional reparameterization, fitted-input-as-prediction, or load-bearing self-citation chain that reduces the central result to the paper's own inputs. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the standard LambdaCDM background cosmology and the assumption that vector modes are generated only by the three listed initial conditions; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (1)

r_v
Amplitude parameter of vector modes, constrained rather than derived; its prior and pivot scale are chosen by the authors.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard LambdaCDM expansion history and linear perturbation theory remain valid when vector modes are added.
Invoked throughout the constraint derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5608 in / 1363 out tokens · 32458 ms · 2026-05-12T02:11:55.308774+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

Revisiting constraints on primordial vector modes and implications for sourced magnetic fields and observed $EB$ power spectrum
astro-ph.CO 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

Updated constraints on neutrino-sustained primordial vector modes imply magnetic fields too weak to seed observations and cannot reproduce the EB power spectrum while satisfying parity-even limits.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 63 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 7 internal anchors

[1]

Oxford Graduate Texts

Patrick Peter and Jean-Philippe Uzan, Primordial Cosmology. Oxford Graduate Texts. Oxford University Press, 2, 2013

work page 2013
[2]

Academic Press, April, 2020

Scott Dodelson and Fabian Schmidt, Modern Cosmology, 2nd edition . Academic Press, April, 2020

work page 2020
[3]

Bardeen, Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations , Phys

James M. Bardeen, Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations , Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 1882–1905

work page 1980
[4]

Hideo Kodama and Misao Sasaki, Cosmological Perturbation Theory, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 78 (1984) 1–166

work page 1984
[5]

Mukhanov, H

Viatcheslav F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and Robert H. Brandenberger, Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions , Phys. Rept. 215 (1992) 203–333

work page 1992
[6]

White, CMB anisotropies: Total angular momentum method , Phys

Wayne Hu and Martin J. White, CMB anisotropies: Total angular momentum method , Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 596–615, [ astro-ph/9702170]

work page arXiv 1997
[7]

Pereira, Beyond scalar, vector and tensor harmonics in maximally symmetric three-dimensional spaces , Phys

Cyril Pitrou and Thiago S. Pereira, Beyond scalar, vector and tensor harmonics in maximally symmetric three-dimensional spaces , Phys. Rev. D 100 (2019), no. 12 123535, [arXiv:1909.13687]

work page arXiv 2019
[8]

Wayne Hu and Naoshi Sugiyama, Anisotropies in the cosmic microwave background: An Analytic approach, Astrophys. J. 444 (1995) 489–506, [ astro-ph/9407093]

work page arXiv 1995
[9]

Wayne Hu, Weak lensing of the CMB: A harmonic approach , Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 043007, [astro-ph/0001303]

work page arXiv 2000
[10]

Battefeld and Robert Brandenberger, Vector perturbations in a contracting universe, Phys

Thorsten J. Battefeld and Robert Brandenberger, Vector perturbations in a contracting universe, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 121302, [ hep-th/0406180]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004
[11]

Martin Bojowald and Golam Mortuza Hossain, Cosmological vector modes and quantum gravity effects, Class. Quant. Grav. 24 (2007) 4801–4816, [ arXiv:0709.0872]

work page arXiv 2007
[12]

Mian Zhu and Chao Chen, Constraining matter-bounce scenario from scalar-induced vector perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025), no. 2 023549, [ arXiv:2409.09458]

work page arXiv 2025
[13]

Andrew Mack, Tina Kahniashvili, and Arthur Kosowsky, Microwave background signatures of a primordial stochastic magnetic field , Phys. Rev. D 65 (2002) 123004, [astro-ph/0105504]

work page arXiv 2002
[14]

Paoletti, F

D. Paoletti, F. Finelli, and F. Paci, The scalar, vector and tensor contributions of a stochastic background of magnetic fields to cosmic microwave background anisotropies , MNRAS 396 (June, 2009) 523–534, [ arXiv:0811.0230]

work page arXiv 2009
[15]

Yamazaki, Kiyotomo Ichiki, Toshitaka Kajino, and Grant J

Dai G. Yamazaki, Kiyotomo Ichiki, Toshitaka Kajino, and Grant J. Mathews, Effects of a Primordial Magnetic Field on Low and High Multipoles of the CMB , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 043005, [ arXiv:0801.2572]

work page arXiv 2008
[16]

Keitaro Takahashi, Kiyotomo Ichiki, and Naoshi Sugiyama, Electromagnetic Properties of the Early Universe , Phys. Rev. D 77 (2008) 124028, [ arXiv:0710.4620]

work page arXiv 2008
[17]

Durrer, T

R. Durrer, T. Kahniashvili, and A. Yates, Microwave background anisotropies from Alfven waves, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 123004, [ astro-ph/9807089]

work page arXiv 1998
[18]

Tina Kahniashvili and Bharat Ratra, Effects of Cosmological Magnetic Helicity on the Cosmic Microwave Background, Phys. Rev. D 71 (2005) 103006, [ astro-ph/0503709]. – 13 –

work page Pith review arXiv 2005
[19]

Paoletti, J

D. Paoletti, J. Chluba, F. Finelli, and J. A. Rubi˜ no Martin, Constraints on Primordial Magnetic Fields from their impact on the ionization history with Planck 2018 , arXiv:2204.06302

work page arXiv 2018
[20]

Daniela Paoletti and Fabio Finelli, Constraints on primordial magnetic fields from magnetically-induced perturbations: current status and future perspectives with LiteBIRD and future ground based experiments , JCAP 11 (2019) 028, [ arXiv:1910.07456]

work page arXiv 2019
[21]

Ichiki, T

Dai Yamazaki, K. Ichiki, T. Kajino, and G. J. Mathews, Constraints on the evolution of the primordial magnetic field from the small scale cmb angular anisotropy , Astrophys. J. 646 (2006) 719–729, [ astro-ph/0602224]

work page arXiv 2006
[22]

Teppei Minoda, Kiyotomo Ichiki, and Hiroyuki Tashiro, Small-scale CMB anisotropies induced by the primordial magnetic fields , JCAP 03 (2021) 093, [ arXiv:2012.12542]

work page arXiv 2021
[23]

Ali Rida Khalife and Cyril Pitrou, Resurrecting gravitational vector modes and their magnetogenesis, JCAP 10 (2025) 112, [ arXiv:2410.03612]

work page arXiv 2025
[24]

SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field

SPT-3G Collaboration, E. Camphuis et al., SPT-3G D1: CMB temperature and polarization power spectra and cosmology from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field, arXiv:2506.20707

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2019
[25]

Quan et al., SPT-3G D1: Maps of the millimeter-wave sky from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field , arXiv:2603.20163

SPT-3G Collaboration, W. Quan et al., SPT-3G D1: Maps of the millimeter-wave sky from 2019 and 2020 observations of the SPT-3G Main field , arXiv:2603.20163

work page arXiv 2019
[26]

ACT Collaboration, Thibaut Louis et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Power Spectra, Likelihoods and ΛCDM Parameters, arXiv:2503.14452

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv
[27]

ACT Collaboration, Erminia Calabrese et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Constraints on Extended Cosmological Models , arXiv:2503.14454

work page arXiv
[28]

ACT Collaboration, Sigurd Naess et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Maps , arXiv:2503.14451

work page arXiv
[29]

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A6, [ arXiv:1807.06209]

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[30]

Efstathiou, J.R

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. I. Overview and the cosmological legacy of Planck, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A1, [ arXiv:1807.06205]

work page arXiv 2018
[31]

SPT Collaboration, J. T. Sayre et al., Measurements of B-mode Polarization of the Cosmic Microwave Background from 500 Square Degrees of SPTpol Data , Phys. Rev. D 101 (2020), no. 12 122003, [ arXiv:1910.05748]

work page arXiv 2020
[32]

Balkenhol, A

L. Balkenhol, A. Coerver, C. L. Reichardt, and J. A. Zebrowski, Probing Anisotropic Cosmic Birefringence with Foreground-Marginalised SPT B-mode Likelihoods, Open J. Astrophys. 8 (2025) 147459, [ arXiv:2510.07928]

work page arXiv 2025
[33]

BICEP , Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., Improved Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season , Phys. Rev. Lett. 127 (2021), no. 15 151301, [ arXiv:2110.00483]

work page arXiv 2018
[34]

Lidsey, Andrew R

James E. Lidsey, Andrew R. Liddle, Edward W. Kolb, et al., Reconstructing the inflation potential : An overview , Rev. Mod. Phys. 69 (1997) 373–410, [ astro-ph/9508078]

work page arXiv 1997
[35]

Antony Lewis, Observable primordial vector modes , Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 043518, [astro-ph/0403583]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2004
[36]

Kiyotomo Ichiki, Keitaro Takahashi, and Naoshi Sugiyama, Constraint on the primordial vector mode and its magnetic field generation from seven-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe observations, Phys. Rev. D 85 (Feb., 2012) 043009, [arXiv:1112.4705]

work page Pith review arXiv 2012
[37]

Anton Rebhan, Large scale rotational perturbations of a Friedmann universe with collisionless matter and primordial magnetic fields , Astrophys. J. 392 (1992) 385–393

work page 1992
[38]

Rebhan and Dominik J

Anton K. Rebhan and Dominik J. Schwarz, Kinetic versus thermal field theory approach to cosmological perturbations, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2541–2559, [ gr-qc/9403032]

work page arXiv 1994
[39]

Durrer, M

R. Durrer, M. Kunz, and A. Melchiorri, Cosmic structure formation with topological defects, Phys. Rept. 364 (2002) 1–81, [ astro-ph/0110348]. – 14 –

work page arXiv 2002
[40]

Aghanim and others (Planck), Astron

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim et al., Planck 2018 results. V. CMB power spectra and likelihoods, Astron. Astrophys. 641 (2020) A5, [ arXiv:1907.12875]

work page arXiv 2018
[41]

J., et al., Planck intermediate results - LVII

Planck Collaboration, Akrami, Y., Andersen, K. J., et al., Planck intermediate results - LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing , A&A 643 (2020) A42

work page 2020
[42]

Balkenhol, C

L. Balkenhol, C. Trendafilova, K. Benabed, and S. Galli, candl: cosmic microwave background analysis with a differentiable likelihood , Astron. Astrophys. 686 (2024) A10, [arXiv:2401.13433]

work page arXiv 2024
[43]

Dunkley et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: likelihood for small-scale CMB data, JCAP 07 (2013) 025, [ arXiv:1301.0776]

J. Dunkley et al., The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: likelihood for small-scale CMB data, JCAP 07 (2013) 025, [ arXiv:1301.0776]

work page arXiv 2013
[44]

Balkenhol, Compressed ’CMB-lite’ Likelihoods Using Automatic Differentiation , arXiv:2412.00826

L. Balkenhol, Compressed ’CMB-lite’ Likelihoods Using Automatic Differentiation , arXiv:2412.00826

work page arXiv
[45]

Julien Lesgourgues, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) I: Overview , arXiv e-prints (Apr., 2011) arXiv:1104.2932, [ arXiv:1104.2932]

work page Pith review arXiv 2011
[46]

The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes

Diego Blas, Julien Lesgourgues, and Thomas Tram, The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS). Part II: Approximation schemes , JCAP 2011 (July, 2011) 034, [arXiv:1104.2933]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2011
[48]

Jes´ us Torrado and Antony Lewis,Cobaya: code for Bayesian analysis of hierarchical physical models, JCAP 2021 (May, 2021) 057, [arXiv:2005.05290]

work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021
[49]

Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology

Jes´ us Torrado and Antony Lewis, “Cobaya: Bayesian analysis in cosmology.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1910.019, Oct., 2019

work page 1910
[50]

Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science 7 (1992), no

Andrew Gelman and Donald B. Rubin, Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences, Statistical Science 7 (1992), no. 4 457–472

work page 1992
[51]

Coralia Cartis, Jan Fiala, Benjamin Marteau, and Lindon Roberts, Improving the Flexibility and Robustness of Model-Based Derivative-Free Optimization Solvers , arXiv e-prints (Mar., 2018) arXiv:1804.00154, [ arXiv:1804.00154]

work page Pith review arXiv 2018
[52]

Coralia Cartis, Lindon Roberts, and Oliver Sheridan-Methven, Escaping local minima with derivative-free methods: a numerical investigation , arXiv e-prints (Dec., 2018) arXiv:1812.11343, [arXiv:1812.11343]

work page arXiv 2018
[53]

Emil Brinch Holm, Andreas Nygaard, Jeppe Dakin, Steen Hannestad, and Thomas Tram, PROSPECT: a profile likelihood code for frequentist cosmological parameter inference , Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 535 (2024), no. 4 3686–3699, [ arXiv:2312.02972]

work page arXiv 2024
[54]

Shohei Saga, Maresuke Shiraishi, and Kiyotomo Ichiki, Constraining primordial vector mode from B-mode polarization, JCAP 10 (2014) 004, [ arXiv:1405.4810]

work page Pith review arXiv 2014
[55]

Jerome Martin, Christophe Ringeval, and Vincent Vennin, Shortcomings of New Parametrizations of Inflation , Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016), no. 12 123521, [arXiv:1609.04739]

work page arXiv 2016
[56]

D. S. Zharov, O. O. Sobol, and S. I. Vilchinskii, ACT observations, reheating, and Starobinsky and Higgs inflation , Phys. Rev. D 112 (2025), no. 2 023544, [arXiv:2505.01129]

work page arXiv 2025
[57]

Hazumi et al., LiteBIRD: JAXA’s new strategic L-class mission for all-sky surveys of cosmic microwave background polarization , Proc

LiteBIRD Collaboration, M. Hazumi et al., LiteBIRD: JAXA’s new strategic L-class mission for all-sky surveys of cosmic microwave background polarization , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 11443 (2020) 114432F, [ arXiv:2101.12449]

work page arXiv 2020
[58]

Allyset al.(LiteBIRD), PTEP2023, 042F01 (2023), arXiv:2202.02773 [astro-ph.IM]

LiteBIRD Collaboration, E. Allys et al., Probing Cosmic Inflation with the LiteBIRD Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Survey , PTEP 2023 (2023), no. 4 042F01, [arXiv:2202.02773]

work page arXiv 2023
[59]

Moncelsi et al., Receiver development for BICEP Array, a next-generation CMB polarimeter at the South Pole , Proc

L. Moncelsi et al., Receiver development for BICEP Array, a next-generation CMB polarimeter at the South Pole , Proc. SPIE Int. Soc. Opt. Eng. 11453 (2020) 1145314, [arXiv:2012.04047]. – 15 –

work page arXiv 2020
[60]

BICEP/Keck Collaboration, P. A. R. Ade et al., Constraining Inflation with the BICEP/Keck CMB Polarization Experiments , in 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology, 5, 2024. arXiv:2405.19469

work page arXiv 2024
[61]

Jakub Mielczarek, Thomas Cailleteau, Aurelien Barrau, and Julien Grain, Anomaly-free vector perturbations with holonomy corrections in loop quantum cosmology , Class. Quant. Grav. 29 (2012) 085009, [ arXiv:1106.3744]

work page arXiv 2012
[62]

Roy Maartens and Kazuya Koyama, Brane-World Gravity, Living Rev. Rel. 13 (2010) 5, [arXiv:1004.3962]

work page arXiv 2010
[63]

Alexey Golovnev, Viatcheslav Mukhanov, and Vitaly Vanchurin, Vector Inflation, JCAP 06 (2008) 009, [ arXiv:0802.2068]

work page arXiv 2008
[64]

Alexey Golovnev and Vitaly Vanchurin, Cosmological perturbations from vector inflation , Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 103524, [ arXiv:0903.2977]. – 16 –

work page arXiv 2009