Recognition: 2 theorem links
· Lean TheoremCombined Diffusion-Relaxation MRI to Assess Muscle Microstructure and Composition
Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Combined diffusion-relaxation MRI yields TE-independent estimates of muscle microstructure and vascular fraction.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
A diffusion-relaxation acquisition combining six b-values and four echo times in a 12-minute protocol produces parameter estimates for mean diffusivity, fractional anisotropy, and vascular fraction that remain stable across echo times from 50 to 90 ms. Models that ignore relaxation effects show large biases, such as mean diffusivity dropping by up to 47 percent and vascular fraction rising by up to 297 percent with longer echo times. Tissue T2 values fall between 31 and 36 ms while vascular T2 values range from 66 to 86 ms.
What carries the argument
Two-compartment diffusion-relaxation models that jointly fit tissue and vascular compartments using combined b-value and TE data.
If this is right
- Estimates of vascular fraction become accurate with reduced bias compared to diffusion-only fits.
- Microstructural parameters like mean diffusivity and fractional anisotropy no longer depend on the echo time chosen.
- The method fits within a short 12-minute single-slice scan suitable for clinical use.
- Potential for tracking changes in muscle physiology during exercise or rehabilitation without additional acquisitions.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Extending the protocol to multi-slice or 3D coverage could enable whole-leg assessment in similar time.
- The approach may generalize to other tissues where perfusion and microstructure both contribute to MRI signals.
- Validation against histology in disease models would strengthen claims for neuromuscular pathology applications.
Load-bearing premise
The two-compartment model with tissue and vascular pools fully accounts for the main signal sources in healthy muscle across the tested b-values and echo times.
What would settle it
If applying the same combined acquisition and fitting to a muscle sample with known independent measures of T2 and diffusivity shows persistent echo-time dependence in the estimated parameters, the claim of robustness would be falsified.
read the original abstract
Quantifying muscle tissue properties is crucial for understanding pathophysiological changes occurring in skeletal muscle (SM). In particular, T2 relaxation and diffusion MRI (dMRI) are promising techniques. However, typical methods measure T2 and diffusion separately, making them less specific to microstructure than emerging combined diffusion-relaxation techniques. Here we demonstrate a combined diffusion-relaxation MRI approach for disentangling T2 and diffusivity properties in SM. A diffusion-relaxation acquisition was implemented on a 3 T scanner, combining six b-values and four echo times within a 12-min single-slice protocol. Five healthy participants were enrolled. Data were analysed with six microstructural diffusion and diffusion-relaxation models. Mean parameter values were extracted from manually segmented calf muscles. Models neglecting T2 relaxation showed strong TE dependence: mean diffusivity (MD) decreased by up to 47\%, fractional anisotropy (FA) increased by up to 75\%, and vascular fraction fv increased by up to 297\% when TE increased from 50 to 90 ms. Diffusion-relaxation models produced TE-independent estimates. Tissue and vascular relaxation times ranged 31-36 ms T2t and 66-86 ms T2v, respectively. Simulations confirmed improved accuracy for fv estimation (r=0.95; RMSE=0.03) and reduced TE-related bias. Combined diffusion-relaxation MRI provides robust, TE-independent estimates of muscle microstructural and perfusion-related biomarkers. The quantitative improvements observed - particularly in the estimation of fv - show its potential to provide non-invasive biomarkers for the assessment of muscle physiology, exercise adaptation, rehabilitation, and neuromuscular pathology.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript presents a combined diffusion-relaxation MRI protocol for assessing skeletal muscle microstructure and composition. A 12-minute single-slice acquisition at 3T with six b-values and four echo times was performed on five healthy volunteers; data from calf muscles were fitted with six diffusion and diffusion-relaxation models. Diffusion-only models exhibited strong TE dependence (MD decreased up to 47%, FA increased up to 75%, fv increased up to 297% from TE=50 to 90 ms), while joint models produced TE-independent estimates with tissue T2t of 31-36 ms and vascular T2v of 66-86 ms. Simulations demonstrated improved fv recovery (r=0.95, RMSE=0.03).
Significance. If the central claims hold, the approach supplies more robust, TE-independent microstructural and perfusion-related biomarkers than separate T2 or diffusion measurements alone. The empirical model comparison and simulation-based validation of parameter recovery constitute clear strengths that could support applications in muscle physiology, exercise adaptation, rehabilitation, and neuromuscular pathology assessment.
major comments (2)
- [Methods] Methods (acquisition and modeling): The joint two-compartment model (MDt, MDv, fv, T2t, T2v) is fitted to only 24 measurements. No parameter covariance matrices, condition numbers of the design matrix, or stability tests under b-TE subsampling are reported. This information is required to confirm that the observed TE-independence arises from accurate compartment separation rather than trade-offs between fv and T2v.
- [Results] Results (parameter estimation): Simulations recover fv with r=0.95, but no corresponding accuracy metrics or bias values are given for MDt, MDv, T2t or T2v. In addition, the reported T2t (31-36 ms) and T2v (66-86 ms) ranges should be accompanied by subject-wise standard deviations and direct comparison to published 3T muscle and blood T2 values to establish plausibility.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'six microstructural diffusion and diffusion-relaxation models' without enumerating their exact functional forms or free parameters; these should be listed explicitly with equations in the Methods section.
- [Discussion] The discussion would benefit from a brief limitations paragraph addressing the two-compartment assumption and the small cohort size (n=5).
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed comments on our manuscript. We have addressed each major point below and will incorporate the suggested improvements in the revised version to further strengthen the evidence for TE-independent parameter estimation in combined diffusion-relaxation MRI.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Methods] Methods (acquisition and modeling): The joint two-compartment model (MDt, MDv, fv, T2t, T2v) is fitted to only 24 measurements. No parameter covariance matrices, condition numbers of the design matrix, or stability tests under b-TE subsampling are reported. This information is required to confirm that the observed TE-independence arises from accurate compartment separation rather than trade-offs between fv and T2v.
Authors: We agree that additional numerical diagnostics would strengthen confidence in the five-parameter joint model. Although the consistent TE-independence across models and the fv recovery in simulations already indicate reliable compartment separation, we will add the requested information in the revised Methods section. Specifically, we will report parameter covariance matrices for representative voxels, condition numbers of the design matrix, and results from stability tests performed by subsampling the b-TE combinations. These additions will directly address the concern regarding potential trade-offs between fv and T2v. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results] Results (parameter estimation): Simulations recover fv with r=0.95, but no corresponding accuracy metrics or bias values are given for MDt, MDv, T2t or T2v. In addition, the reported T2t (31-36 ms) and T2v (66-86 ms) ranges should be accompanied by subject-wise standard deviations and direct comparison to published 3T muscle and blood T2 values to establish plausibility.
Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting these reporting gaps. While our simulations emphasized fv as the key improved parameter, we will expand the simulation results to include correlation coefficients, RMSE, and bias values for MDt, MDv, T2t, and T2v as well. In the Results section, we will also add subject-wise standard deviations for the T2t and T2v estimates and include direct comparisons to published 3T literature values (muscle tissue T2 typically 30-40 ms; blood T2 approximately 60-100 ms depending on field strength and oxygenation). These values align well with our reported ranges and will establish greater plausibility. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: empirical model comparison on acquired and simulated data
full rationale
The paper acquires diffusion-relaxation data with a fixed 6 b-value × 4 TE protocol, fits six standard microstructural models (diffusion-only and joint diffusion-relaxation), extracts mean parameters from segmented calf muscle, and validates via simulations that recover known ground-truth values. No equation or claim reduces a reported prediction to a fitted quantity by construction, no self-citation supplies a load-bearing uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The TE-independence result is an observed empirical difference between model classes on the same data, not a definitional identity. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (3)
- T2t (tissue T2)
- T2v (vascular T2)
- fv (vascular fraction)
axioms (2)
- domain assumption Two-compartment (tissue + vascular) model adequately describes the combined diffusion-relaxation signal in healthy skeletal muscle.
- domain assumption The selected b-value and TE ranges provide sufficient independent information to separate diffusivity and relaxation without degeneracy.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.leanwashburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
S(b,TE) = S0 [fv · e^{-b·Dv} e^{-TE/T2v} + (1-fv)·e^{-b·Dt} e^{-TE/T2t}] (Ball-Ball-T2 model); TE-independent MD, fv, T2t/T2v after joint fit
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/BlackBodyRadiationDeep.leanblackBodyRadiationDeepCert unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
Simulations recover fv with r=0.95, RMSE=0.03; T2t 31-36 ms, T2v 66-86 ms
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Berry DB, Gordon III JA, Adair V , Frank LR, Ward SR. From V oxels to Physiology: A Review of Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Applications in Skeletal Muscle.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2024
work page 2024
-
[2]
Muscle MRI in muscular dystrophies.Acta Myologica.2015;34(2-3):95
Díaz-Manera J, Llauger J, Gallardo E, Illa I. Muscle MRI in muscular dystrophies.Acta Myologica.2015;34(2-3):95
work page 2015
-
[3]
Mastropietro A, Casali N, Taccogna MG, D’Angelo MG, Rizzo G, Peruzzo D. Classification of Muscular Dystrophies from MR Images Improves Using the Swin Transformer Deep Learning Model.Bioengineering.2024;11(6):580
work page 2024
-
[4]
Isern-Kebschull J, Mechó S, Pedret C, et al. Muscle healing in sports injuries: MRI findings and proposed classification based on a single institutional experience and clinical observation.RadioGraphics.2024;44(8):e230147
work page 2024
-
[5]
Mastropietro A, Peruzzo D, Taccogna MG, et al. Multiparametric MRI Assessment of Morpho-Functional Muscle Changes Following a 6-Month FES-Cycling Training Program: Pilot Study in People With a Complete Spinal Cord Injury.JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies. 2025;12:e64825
work page 2025
-
[6]
MRI of skeletal muscle perfusion
Adelnia F, Cameron D, Reiter DA. MRI of skeletal muscle perfusion. In: , , . 11. Elsevier, 2023:513–540
work page 2023
-
[7]
Oudeman J, Nederveen AJ, Strijkers GJ, Maas M, Luijten PR, Froeling M. Techniques and applications of skeletal muscle diffusion tensor imaging: a review.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2016;43(4):773–788
work page 2016
-
[8]
Fiber type characterization in skeletal muscle by diffusion tensor imaging.NMR in Biomedicine
Scheel M, Roth vP, Winkler T, et al. Fiber type characterization in skeletal muscle by diffusion tensor imaging.NMR in Biomedicine. 2013;26(10):1220–1224
work page 2013
-
[9]
Englund EK, Reiter DA, Shahidi B, Sigmund EE. Intravoxel incoherent motion magnetic resonance imaging in skeletal muscle: review and future directions.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2022;55(4):988–1012
work page 2022
-
[10]
Mastropietro A, Porcelli S, Cadioli M, et al. Triggered intravoxel incoherent motion MRI for the assessment of calf muscle perfusion during isometric intermittent exercise.NMR in Biomedicine.2018;31(6):e3922
work page 2018
-
[11]
Ran J, Yin C, Liu C, et al. The diagnostic value of MR IVIM and T2 mapping in differentiating autoimmune myositis from muscular dystrophy. Academic radiology.2021;28(6):e182–e188
work page 2021
-
[12]
Shahidi B, Behun JJ, Berry DB, Raiszadeh K, Englund EK. Intravoxel incoherent motion imaging predicts exercise-based rehabilitation response in individuals with low back pain.NMR in Biomedicine.2021;34(12):e4595
work page 2021
-
[13]
Shu D, Zhang C, Dai S, Wang S, Liu J, Ding J. Acute effects of foam rolling on hamstrings after half-marathon: a muscle functional magnetic resonance imaging study.Frontiers in Physiology.2021;12:723092
work page 2021
-
[14]
Karampinos DC, King KF, Sutton BP, Georgiadis JG. Intravoxel partially coherent motion technique: characterization of the anisotropy of skeletal muscle microvasculature.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: An Official Journal of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.2010;31(4):942–953
work page 2010
-
[15]
Finkenstaedt T, Klarhoefer M, Eberhardt C, et al. The IVIM signal in the healthy cerebral gray matter: a play of spherical and non-spherical components.Neuroimage.2017;152:340–347. Combined Diffusion-Relaxation MRI to Assess Muscle Microstructure and Composition 15
work page 2017
-
[16]
Zhang XS, Sang XQ, Kuai ZX, et al. Investigation of intravoxel incoherent motion tensor imaging for the characterization of the in vivo human heart.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.2021;85(3):1414–1426
work page 2021
-
[17]
Liu AL, Mikheev A, Rusinek H, et al. REnal flow and microstructure anisotropy (REFMAP) MRI in normal and peritumoral renal tissue.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2018;48(1):188–197
work page 2018
-
[18]
Slator PJ, Hutter J, McCabe L, et al. Placenta microstructure and microcirculation imaging with diffusion MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2018;80(2):756–766
work page 2018
-
[19]
Simultaneous quantification of anisotropic microcirculation and microstructure in peripheral nerve
Merchant S, Yeoh S, Mahan MA, Hsu EW. Simultaneous quantification of anisotropic microcirculation and microstructure in peripheral nerve. Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022;11(11):3036
work page 2022
-
[20]
Panagiotaki E, Chan RW, Dikaios N, et al. Microstructural characterization of normal and malignant human prostate tissue with vascular, extracellular, and restricted diffusion for cytometry in tumours magnetic resonance imaging.Invest. Radiol..2015;50(4):218–227
work page 2015
-
[21]
Singh S, Giganti F, Dickinson L, et al. Prostate MR image quality of apparent diffusion coefficient maps versus fractional intracellular volume maps from VERDICT MRI using the PI-QUAL score and a dedicated Likert scale for artefacts.European Journal of Radiology.2023;168:111109
work page 2023
-
[22]
Figini M, Castellano A, Bailo M, et al. Comprehensive brain tumour characterisation with VERDICT-MRI: evaluation of cellular and vascular measures validated by histology.Cancers.2023;15(9):2490
work page 2023
-
[23]
Bonny JM, Zanca M, Boespflug-Tanguy O, Dedieu V , Joandel S, Renou JP. Characterization in vivo of muscle fiber types by magnetic resonance imaging.Magnetic resonance imaging.1998;16(2):167–173
work page 1998
-
[24]
Patten C, Meyer RA, Fleckenstein JL. T2 mapping of muscle. In: . 7. Copyright© 2002 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New . . . . 2003:297–307
work page 2002
-
[25]
Wokke BH, Van Den Bergen JC, Hooijmans MT, Verschuuren JJ, Niks EH, Kan HE. T2 relaxation times are increased in skeletal muscle of DMD but not BMD patients.Muscle & nerve.2016;53(1):38–43
work page 2016
-
[26]
Mankodi A, Azzabou N, Bulea T, et al. Skeletal muscle water T2 as a biomarker of disease status and exercise effects in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy.Neuromuscular Disorders.2017;27(8):705–714
work page 2017
-
[27]
Slator PJ, Palombo M, Miller KL, et al. Combined diffusion-relaxometry microstructure imaging: Current status and future prospects.Magnetic resonance in medicine.2021;86(6):2987–3011
work page 2021
-
[28]
Ochi E, Tsuchiya Y , Nosaka K. Differences in post-exercise T2 relaxation time changes between eccentric and concentric contractions of the elbow flexors.European journal of applied physiology.2016;116:2145–2154
work page 2016
-
[29]
Cameron D, Reiter DA, Adelnia F, et al. Age-related changes in human skeletal muscle microstructure and architecture assessed by diffusion-tensor magnetic resonance imaging and their association with muscle strength.Aging cell.2023;22(7):e13851
work page 2023
-
[30]
Jerome NP, d’Arcy J, Feiweier T, et al. Extended T2-IVIM model for correction of TE dependence of pseudo-diffusion volume fraction in clinical diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.Physics in Medicine & Biology.2016;61(24):N667
work page 2016
-
[31]
Li K, Dortch RD, Welch EB, et al. Multi-parametric MRI characterization of healthy human thigh muscles at 3.0 T–relaxation, magnetization transfer, fat/water, and diffusion tensor imaging.NMR in Biomedicine.2014;27(9):1070–1084
work page 2014
-
[32]
MRI of skeletal muscles in participants with type 2 diabetes with or without diabetic polyneuropathy
Stouge A, Khan KS, Kristensen AG, et al. MRI of skeletal muscles in participants with type 2 diabetes with or without diabetic polyneuropathy. Radiology.2020;297(3):608–619
work page 2020
-
[33]
Otto LA, Pol v. dWL, Schlaffke L, et al. Quantitative MRI of skeletal muscle in a cross-sectional cohort of patients with spinal muscular atrophy types 2 and 3.NMR in Biomedicine.2020;33(10):e4357
work page 2020
-
[34]
Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Grenier P, Cabanis E, Laval-Jeantet M. MR imaging of intravoxel incoherent motions: application to diffusion and perfusion in neurologic disorders..Radiology.1986;161(2):401–407
work page 1986
-
[35]
Panagiotaki E, Schneider T, Siow B, Hall MG, Lythgoe MF, Alexander DC. Compartment models of the diffusion MR signal in brain white matter: A taxonomy and comparison.NeuroImage.2012;59(3):2241-2254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.081
-
[36]
MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging.Biophysical Journal.1994;66(1):259-267
Basser P, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging.Biophysical Journal.1994;66(1):259-267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3495(94)80775-1
-
[37]
Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory.Neuroimage
Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, Ades-Aron B, Sijbers J, Fieremans E. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory.Neuroimage. 2016;142:394–406
work page 2016
-
[38]
Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts.Magnetic resonance in medicine
Kellner E, Dhital B, Kiselev VG, Reisert M. Gibbs-ringing artifact removal based on local subvoxel-shifts.Magnetic resonance in medicine. 2016;76(5):1574–1581
work page 2016
-
[39]
Andersson JL, Skare S, Ashburner J. How to correct susceptibility distortions in spin-echo echo-planar images: application to diffusion tensor imaging.Neuroimage.2003;20(2):870–888. 16 FIGINIET AL
work page 2003
-
[40]
Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.Neuroimage
Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, et al. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.Neuroimage. 2004;23:S208–S219
work page 2004
-
[41]
Figini M, Palombo M, Bailo M, et al. Accelerated Glioma characterization with VERDICT MRI: a comparison between deep learning and non-linear least squares fitting. In: No. 3502. ISMRM. ISMRM 2024; Concord, CA
work page 2024
-
[42]
Palombo M, Valindria V , Singh S, et al. Joint estimation of relaxation and diffusion tissue parameters for prostate cancer with relaxation-verdict MRI.Scientific Reports.2023;13(1). doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30182-1
-
[43]
Sen S, Valindria V , Slator PJ, et al. Differentiating False Positive Lesions from Clinically Significant Cancer and Normal Prostate Tissue Using VERDICT MRI and Other Diffusion Models.Diagnostics.2022;12(7). doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071631
-
[44]
Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and Physiological Features of Tissues Elucidated by Quantitative-Diffusion-Tensor MRI.Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series B.1996;111(3):209-219. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmrb.1996.0086
-
[45]
Monte JR, Hooijmans MT, Froeling M, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and quantitative T2 mapping to monitor muscle recovery following hamstring injury.NMR in Biomedicine.2023;36(7):e4902. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4902
-
[46]
Keller S, Yamamura J, Sedlacik J, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging combined with T2 mapping to quantify changes in the skeletal muscle associated with training and endurance exercise in competitive triathletes.European Radiology.2020;30(5):2830-2842. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06576-z
-
[47]
Ha DH, Choi S, Kang EJ, Park HT. Diffusion tensor imaging and T2 mapping in early denervated skeletal muscle in rats.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2015;42(3):617-623. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24818
-
[48]
Marty B, Baudin PY , Reyngoudt H, et al. Simultaneous muscle water T2 and fat fraction mapping using transverse relaxometry with stimulated echo compensation.NMR in Biomedicine.2016;29(4):431-443. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.3459
-
[49]
Yao L, Yip AL, Shrader JA, et al. Magnetic resonance measurement of muscle T2, fat-corrected T2 and fat fraction in the assessment of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.Rheumatology.2015;55(3):441-449. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev344
-
[50]
Yanagisawa O, Kurihara T, Kobayashi N, Fukubayashi T. Strenuous resistance exercise effects on magnetic resonance diffusion pa- rameters and muscle–tendon function in human skeletal muscle.Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging.2011;34(4):887-894. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22668
-
[51]
Lin AL, Qin Q, Zhao X, Duong TQ. Blood longitudinal (T1) and transverse (T2) relaxation time constants at 11.7 Tesla.Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.2012;25(3):245-249. doi: 10.1007/s10334-011-0287-2
-
[52]
Lu H, Ge Y . Quantitative evaluation of oxygenation in venous vessels using T2-Relaxation-Under-Spin-Tagging MRI.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.2008;60(2):357-363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21627
-
[53]
Sara LK, Gutsch SB, Hunter SK. The single-leg heel raise does not predict maximal plantar flexion strength in healthy males and females.PLoS One.2021;16(8):e0253276
work page 2021
-
[54]
Ababneh ZQ, Ababneh R, Maier SE, et al. On the correlation between T2 and tissue diffusion coefficients in exercised muscle: quantitative measurements at 3T within the tibialis anterior.Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.2008;21(4):273-278. doi: 10.1007/s10334-008-0120-8
-
[55]
Qin W, Shui Yu C, Zhang F, et al. Effects of echo time on diffusion quantification of brain white matter at 1.5T and 3.0T.Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.2009;61(4):755-760. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21920
-
[56]
Does MD, Gore JC. Compartmental study of diffusion and relaxation measured in vivo in normal and ischemic rat brain and trigeminal nerve. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.2000;43(6):837-844. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/1522-2594(200006)43:6<837::AID-MRM9>3.0.CO;2-O
-
[57]
Johansson J, Lagerstrand K, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Laesser M, Hebelka H, Maier SE. Normal Brain and Brain Tumor ADC: Changes Resulting From Variation of Diffusion Time and/or Echo Time in Pulsed-Gradient Spin Echo Diffusion Imaging.Investigative Radiology.2024;59(10)
work page 2024
-
[58]
Froeling M, Nederveen AJ, Nicolay K, Strijkers GJ. DTI of human skeletal muscle: the effects of diffusion encoding parameters, signal-to-noise ratio and T2 on tensor indices and fiber tracts.NMR in Biomedicine.2013;26(11):1339-1352. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.2959
-
[59]
Egnell L, Jerome NP, Andreassen MMS, Bathen TF, Goa PE. Effects of echo time on IVIM quantifications of locally advanced breast cancer in clinical diffusion-weighted MRI at 3T.NMR in Biomedicine.2022;35(5):e4654. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.4654 SUPPORTING INFORMA TION Additional supporting information may be found in the online version of the articl...
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.