pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10232 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ✦ hep-th · cond-mat.str-el· math-ph· math.AT· math.MP· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Bulk-Edge Correspondence via Higher Gauge Theory

Hisham Sati , Urs Schreiber
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 05:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th cond-mat.str-elmath-phmath.ATmath.MPquant-ph
keywords bulk-edge correspondencehigher gauge theoryfractional quantum HallHopf fibrationM-branessupergravityCohomotopychiral edge currents
0
0 comments X

The pith

The complex Hopf fibration classifies bulk-edge correspondence in fractional quantum Hall systems and reconstructs their chiral edge currents.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper recasts the bulk-edge correspondence for fractional quantum Hall systems in terms of effective relative higher gauge theory governed by choices of classifying fibrations. It identifies the complex Hopf fibration as the structure that controls the topological effects between bulk and boundary. This choice produces a direct reconstruction of the Floreanini-Jackiw and Wess-Zumino-Witten chiral edge currents without using a Lagrangian. The same construction arises from M2-branes and M5-branes probing A-type orbifold singularities in eleven-dimensional supergravity when flux is quantized in twisted equivariant differential Cohomotopy. A reader would care because the approach ties observed edge phenomena in quantum materials to geometric structures already studied in string theory.

Core claim

For fractional quantum Hall systems the complex Hopf fibration classifies the bulk/boundary topological effects and yields a non-Lagrangian reconstruction of Floreanini-Jackiw/Wess-Zumino-Witten chiral edge currents. The resulting effective higher gauge theory is geometrically engineered on M2/M5-branes probing A-type orbifold singularities in 11D supergravity, completed by flux-quantization in twisted equivariant differential Cohomotopy, with the M-string ends of M2-branes on M5-branes engineering the boundary of the FQH liquid.

What carries the argument

The complex Hopf fibration, which functions as the classifying fibration for relative higher gauge theory and thereby determines the bulk-edge correspondence together with the chiral edge currents.

If this is right

  • Chiral edge currents in FQH systems arise from the geometry of the Hopf fibration without any Lagrangian description.
  • The boundary of the FQH liquid is realized by the ends of M-strings stretching between M2-branes and M5-branes.
  • The same geometric setup accounts for both the W_infinity symmetry and the supersymmetry that govern long-wavelength collective excitations in FQH liquids.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same classifying-fibration method could be tested on other fractional quantum Hall filling fractions or on related topological phases by selecting different Hopf or Hopf-like fibrations.
  • If the brane-engineering picture holds, spectroscopic measurements of edge-mode symmetries might reveal signatures traceable to M-brane dynamics.
  • The framework supplies a concrete geometric origin for the observed combination of W_infinity and supersymmetry that could be checked against existing data on FQH edge states.

Load-bearing premise

The complex Hopf fibration and the associated TED Cohomotopy flux quantization correctly classify and reconstruct the observed bulk-edge correspondence and chiral currents of fractional quantum Hall systems rather than supplying only a formal analogy.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the chiral edge current obtained from the Hopf fibration that fails to reproduce the measured current in an experimental fractional quantum Hall sample would refute the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10232 by Hisham Sati, Urs Schreiber.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The topological moduli space of the total system forms a couple (10) of ho￾motopy fibrations (Prop. 4.4) exhibiting relations between bulk and boundary moduli. Schematically indicated is: on the left the space of deep bulk or pure boundary moduli, which as such may form separate topological phases bγ|{1}; in the middle the ambient space of total system moduli, in which such nominally separate bulk/boundary… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Anyons in FQH liquids are (quasi-hole vortices associated with) surplus mag￾netic flux quanta (relative to a given rational filling fraction of k flux quanta per electron) through an electron gas occupying an effectively 2-dimensional semiconducting surface Σ. The adiabatic braiding of worldlines of pairs of such anyons causes the quantum state of the entire system to pick up a fixed complex braiding phase… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Some (blackboard-)framed Wilson loop/links and their total crossing/braiding number (writhe), cf. (28). Now, a pure quantum state |k⟩ on a commutative algebra of quantum observables corre￾sponds to its expectation value map, ⟨−⟩ := ⟨k| − |k⟩, (29) being a star-algebra homomorphism from observables to probability amplitudes [SS26a, Prop. 3.2]: C[Z] C [L] exp ( πi k #L), ⟨k|−|k⟩ (30) which as such is fixed, … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The group algebra of the integer Heisenberg group (33) is that characteristic of observables on FQH anyons on a torus, where the quantum state |ψ⟩ of the system changes by the square of the anyon braiding phase ζ ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Some examples of spatial domains (45) considered here, cf. § 4.2.1. closed disk D2 closed annulus A2 constricted annulus A2 cns (Def. 4.9) Concretely, to reflect that the total system over the disk Σ := D2 ⊔ {∞} (cf [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The quotient A 2 /∂A2 of the closed annulus by its bound￾ary is homotopy equivalent to the sphere with an arc, aext, attached to a pair of antipodal points (top map). But this, in turn, is also homotopy-equivalent to the result of contracting an arc, aint, con￾necting these two points inside the sphere (bottom map): This yields the wedge sum of the sphere with a circle (Lem. 4.8). bndry cmpnt bndry cmpnt A… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The connecting homomorphisms ∂n (Def. A.18) in the homotopy LES (Prop. A.19) of a homotopy fibration sequence F ,→ E p ↠ B ((139)) takes loops γ of n-spheres in B (127) to the endpoint n-sphere bγ|{1} in F of any based path bγ of n-spheres in E which covers the loop, p ◦ bγ = γ. then the following diagrams, between the corresponding homotopy LESs (142), commute: πn+1(Y ) πn(F) πn(X) πn(Y ) πn+1(Y ′ ) πn(F … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

More profound than bulk topological order of quantum materials is only its unwinding via gapless excitations along boundaries of the sample. We recast this bulk-edge correspondence -- for the experimentally relevant case of fractional quantum Hall (FQH) systems -- in terms of effective relative higher gauge theory, controlled by choices of classifying fibrations. For FQH systems, we identify the complex Hopf fibration as classifying the bulk/boundary topological effects, and find that it yields a non-Lagrangian reconstruction of Floreanini-Jackiw/Wess-Zumino-Witten chiral edge currents. Remarkably, the resulting effective FQH higher gauge theory turns out to be "geometrically engineered" on M2/M5-branes probing A-type orbi-singularities in 11D supergravity, globally completed by flux-quantization in twisted equivariant differential (TED) Cohomotopy: Here the M-string ends of M2-branes on M5-branes engineer the FQH liquid's boundary. This geometric engineering on M-branes might naturally elucidate the curious combination of $W_\infty$-symmetry and of super-symmetry that is known to govern the collective excitations of FQH liquids at long wavelengths.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that the bulk-edge correspondence in fractional quantum Hall (FQH) systems admits a reformulation as effective relative higher gauge theory classified by fibrations. Specifically, the complex Hopf fibration is identified as the classifying space for bulk and boundary topological effects in FQH liquids, yielding a non-Lagrangian reconstruction of the Floreanini-Jackiw/Wess-Zumino-Witten chiral edge currents. This effective theory is asserted to arise via geometric engineering on M2/M5-branes probing A-type orbifold singularities in 11D supergravity, with global consistency supplied by flux quantization in twisted equivariant differential (TED) Cohomotopy; M-string ends of M2-branes on M5-branes are said to engineer the FQH boundary. The construction is further suggested to account for the observed W_∞ symmetry and supersymmetry of long-wavelength collective excitations.

Significance. If the central identification and reconstruction are substantiated by explicit derivations, the work would establish a concrete link between FQH phenomenology and higher gauge theory together with M-theory, supplying a geometric origin for chiral edge modes and a possible explanation for the coexistence of W_∞ and supersymmetry. The framework is parameter-free and builds on prior TED Cohomotopy flux-quantization results, offering a falsifiable route to new topological invariants or predictions for edge-state dynamics that could be checked against existing FQH transport data.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (identification of the classifying fibration): The manuscript states that the complex Hopf fibration classifies bulk/boundary topological effects and yields a non-Lagrangian reconstruction of FJ/WZW chiral edge currents, yet provides no explicit map from the fibration S^3→S^2 to the standard U(1)_k Chern-Simons bulk theory or to the chiral-boson/WZW edge theory at level k matching the filling fraction. No computation of the induced chiral anomaly, central charge, or anyonic braiding statistics is exhibited, leaving the central claim at the level of structural analogy rather than equivalence of topological invariants.
  2. [§4] §4 (geometric engineering on M-branes): The assertion that M-string ends of M2-branes on M5-branes engineer the FQH boundary, completed by TED Cohomotopy flux quantization, is presented without deriving the effective relative higher gauge theory from the 11D supergravity background or verifying that the resulting quantization conditions reproduce the observed FQH filling fractions and edge-current quantization. This step is load-bearing for the claim of geometric engineering but lacks the required consistency checks.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the relative higher gauge theory and the precise definition of 'non-Lagrangian reconstruction' should be clarified with an explicit dictionary to standard FQH effective actions.
  2. [§3] A brief comparison table or paragraph relating the Hopf-fibration invariants to conventional Chern-Simons level k and filling fraction would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §3] Abstract and §3 (identification of the classifying fibration): The manuscript states that the complex Hopf fibration classifies bulk/boundary topological effects and yields a non-Lagrangian reconstruction of FJ/WZW chiral edge currents, yet provides no explicit map from the fibration S^3→S^2 to the standard U(1)_k Chern-Simons bulk theory or to the chiral-boson/WZW edge theory at level k matching the filling fraction. No computation of the induced chiral anomaly, central charge, or anyonic braiding statistics is exhibited, leaving the central claim at the level of structural analogy rather than equivalence of topological invariants.

    Authors: We appreciate the referee highlighting the desirability of an explicit dictionary between the Hopf fibration data and the standard FQH invariants. The identification in §3 proceeds by noting that the Hopf invariant of the fibration S^3 → S^2 supplies the integer level k that matches the Chern-Simons coefficient for the bulk U(1)_k theory, while the relative higher-gauge structure on the total space encodes the chiral edge modes via the non-Lagrangian Floreanini-Jackiw formulation. Nevertheless, we agree that a direct computation of the induced anomaly, central charge, and braiding would make the equivalence fully explicit rather than structural. In the revised manuscript we will add a short subsection deriving the central charge c = 1 from the Hopf fibration’s Euler class, showing how the level-k quantization arises from the Hopf invariant, and sketching the anyonic statistics via linking numbers in the fibration. This will establish the matching of topological invariants. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (geometric engineering on M-branes): The assertion that M-string ends of M2-branes on M5-branes engineer the FQH boundary, completed by TED Cohomotopy flux quantization, is presented without deriving the effective relative higher gauge theory from the 11D supergravity background or verifying that the resulting quantization conditions reproduce the observed FQH filling fractions and edge-current quantization. This step is load-bearing for the claim of geometric engineering but lacks the required consistency checks.

    Authors: We thank the referee for emphasizing the need for explicit consistency checks in the geometric-engineering construction. The manuscript sketches how the M2/M5-brane configuration probing A-type orbifolds, together with TED Cohomotopy flux quantization, produces the relative higher-gauge theory whose boundary modes reproduce the FQH edge. The filling fractions are encoded in the quantized TED Cohomotopy classes. We acknowledge, however, that a step-by-step reduction from the 11D supergravity equations and a direct verification against standard filling fractions (e.g., ν = 1/3) would strengthen the claim. In the revision we will expand §4 with an explicit derivation of the effective theory from the M-brane background and a consistency check showing that the TED Cohomotopy quantization conditions recover the Laughlin filling fractions together with the quantized edge-current algebra. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained within higher gauge theory framework

full rationale

The paper's central move is to propose that the complex Hopf fibration classifies FQH bulk-edge effects and reconstructs FJ/WZW currents, with the construction geometrically engineered via M2/M5-branes and TED Cohomotopy flux quantization. This identification is presented as the result of the analysis rather than presupposed by definition or by a load-bearing self-citation that reduces the claim to prior inputs. No equations are shown to be equivalent by construction, no fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, and the framework does not invoke a uniqueness theorem from the authors' own prior work to forbid alternatives. While the authors' earlier TED Cohomotopy papers supply the general flux-quantization machinery, the specific application to FQH systems and the resulting non-Lagrangian edge-current reconstruction constitute independent content within the present manuscript. The derivation chain from classifying fibrations through M-brane geometry to chiral currents therefore remains non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on domain assumptions about classifying fibrations and M-brane probes rather than on new free parameters or invented particles; however, the identification of the Hopf fibration as the correct classifier is postulated without independent derivation shown in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The complex Hopf fibration classifies the bulk/boundary topological effects for fractional quantum Hall systems
    Directly stated as the key identification controlling the effective higher gauge theory.
  • domain assumption Flux quantization in twisted equivariant differential (TED) Cohomotopy provides the global completion of the M-brane geometry
    Invoked to finish the 11D supergravity construction.
invented entities (2)
  • Effective relative higher gauge theory for FQH systems no independent evidence
    purpose: To recast and control the bulk-edge correspondence
    Introduced as the mathematical framework that replaces conventional Lagrangian descriptions.
  • M-string ends of M2-branes on M5-branes no independent evidence
    purpose: To engineer the physical boundary of the FQH liquid
    Proposed geometric realization inside 11D supergravity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5517 in / 1768 out tokens · 97727 ms · 2026-05-12T05:27:31.066752+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

25 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2016, pp

    Con- temporary Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2016, pp. 1– 18.doi:10.1090/conm/657/13106. arXiv:1303.4669 [math.CT](cit. on p. 35). [Awo10] S. Awodey.Category Theory. 2nd. Vol

    work page doi:10.1090/conm/657/13106 2016

  2. [2]

    Anand and S

    Oxford Logic Guides. Oxford: Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2010.isbn: 978-0-19-923718-0.doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/978019856861 2.001.0001(cit. on p. 30). [Ban25] P. Banerjee. “Gauge potentials on the M5 brane in twisted equivariant cohomotopy”. In: Journal of High Energy Physics2025.12 (2025), p. 162.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2025)162. arXiv:2507.07049 [hep-th](cit. o...

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/978019856861 2010

  3. [3]

    Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 1976.isbn: 978-0-8218-1879-4.doi:10.1090/mem o/0179.url:https://bookstore.ams.org/memo-8-179(cit. on pp. 36, 37). [BH13] B. A. Bernevig and T. L. Hughes.Topological Insulators and Topological Superconduc- tors. Princeton University Press, 2013.isbn: 9780691151755.url:https://press.pri nceton.edu/books/hardcov...

    work page doi:10.1090/mem 1976

  4. [4]

    Two point-contact interferometer for quantum Hall systems

    arXiv:2603.14440 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 5, 15, 27, 28). [Cha+97] C. Chamon et al. “Two point-contact interferometer for quantum Hall systems”. In: Phys. Rev. B55.4 (Jan. 1997), p. 2331.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevB . 55 . 2331(cit. on p. 12). [CR97] D. C. Cabra and G. L. Rossini. “Explicit connection between conformal field theory and 2+1 Chern-Simons theory”. I...

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217732397001722 1997

  5. [5]

    Kijowski and W

    Les Houches – ´Ecole d’´Et´ e de Physique Th´ eorique. Springer, 1999.doi:10.1007/3- 540- 46637- 1_3. arXiv:hep- th/9902115 [hep-th](cit. on p. 13). [Dup17] S. Duplij. “Geometric Engineering”. In:Concise Encyclopedia of Supersymmetry. Springer, 2017, pp. 165–166.doi:10.1007/1-4020-4522-0_216(cit. on p. 28). [Esc11] H. Eschrig.Topology and Geometry for Phy...

    work page doi:10.1007/3- 1999

  6. [6]

    Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.isbn: 978-3-642-14699-2.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-1 4700-5(cit

    Lecture Notes in Physics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011.isbn: 978-3-642-14699-2.doi:10.1007/978-3-642-1 4700-5(cit. on p. 29). [FF16] A. Fomenko and D. Fuchs.Homotopical Topology. Springer, 2016.isbn: 9783319234885. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-23488-5(cit. on p. 33). [FHT00] Y. F´ elix, S. Halperin, and J.-C. Thomas.Rational Homotopy Theory. Vol

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-1 2011

  7. [7]

    Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics

    Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, 2000.doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0105-9(cit. on p. 36). [For92] S. Forte. “Quantum mechanics and field theory with fractional spin and statistics”. In: Rev. Mod. Phys.64 (1 Jan. 1992), pp. 193–236.doi:10 . 1103 / RevModPhys . 64 . 193 (cit. on p. 9). REFERENCES 43 [Fra13] E. Fradkin.Field Theories of Condensed Matter Ph...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0105-9(cit 2000

  8. [8]

    27–131.doi:10

    Academic Press, 2024, pp. 27–131.doi:10 . 1016 / B978 - 0 - 323 - 90800 - 9 . 00269 -

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Topological quantum computation

    arXiv:2301.13234 [cond-mat.str-el](cit. on p. 3). [Fre+03] M. Freedman et al. “Topological quantum computation”. In:Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society40.1 (2003), pp. 31–38.doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-02-00964-3. arXiv:quant-ph/0101025(cit. on p. 3). [Fri12] G. Friedman. “An elementary illustrated introduction to simplicial sets”. In:Rocky Mountain ...

    work page doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-02-00964-3 2003

  10. [10]

    Sheaf Topos Theory: A powerful setting for Lagrangian Field Theory

    arXiv:1906.07417 [hep-th](cit. on p. 29). [FSS23] D. Fiorenza, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber.The Character Map in Non-abelian Cohomol- ogy: Twisted, Differential, and Generalized.https : / / ncatlab . org / schreiber / sho w/The+Character+Map+in+Non- Abelian+Cohomology. World Scientific, 2023.isbn: 9789811276705.doi:10.1142/13422(cit. on pp. 3, 4, 12, 31, 35–...

    work page doi:10.1142/13422(cit 1906

  11. [11]

    300.doi:10.22323/1.490.0300

    2025, p. 300.doi:10.22323/1.490.0300. arXiv: 2504.08095 [math-ph](cit. on p. 38). [GM13] P. Griffiths and J. Morgan.Rational Homotopy Theory and Differential Forms. Vol

    work page doi:10.22323/1.490.0300 2025

  12. [12]

    Field Theory via Higher Geometry I: Smooth Sets of Fields

    Progress in Mathematics. Boston, MA: Birkh¨ auser, 2013.isbn: 978-1-4614-8467-7.doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8468-4(cit. on p. 37). [GS25] G. Giotopoulos and H. Sati. “Field Theory via Higher Geometry I: Smooth Sets of Fields”. In:Journal of Geometry and Physics213 (July 2025), p. 105462.doi:10.1016 /j.geomphys.2025.105462. arXiv:2312.16301 [math-ph](cit. on p...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8468-4(cit 2013

  13. [13]

    On the space of maps of a closed surface into the 2-sphere

    2004, pp. 1606–1647.doi:10.1142/9789812775 344_0036. arXiv:hep-th/0403225(cit. on p. 3). [Han74] V. L. Hansen. “On the space of maps of a closed surface into the 2-sphere”. In:Mathe- matica Scandinavica35.2 (1974), pp. 149–158.url:https://www.jstor.org/stable /24490694(cit. on p. 10). [Hat02] A. Hatcher.Algebraic Topology. Cambridge University Press, 2002...

    work page doi:10.1142/9789812775 2004

  14. [14]

    The Quillen model category of topological spaces

    Contemporary Mathematics. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 2007, pp. 175–202.doi: 10.1090/conm/436/08409. arXiv:math/0604626 [math.AT](cit. on pp. 36, 37). [Hir19] P. S. Hirschhorn. “The Quillen model category of topological spaces”. In:Expositiones Mathematicae37.1 (2019), pp. 2–24.doi:10.1016/j.exmath.2017.10.004. arXiv: 1508.01942 [math.A...

    work page doi:10.1090/conm/436/08409 2007

  15. [15]

    American Mathematical Society, 2001, pp

    Contemporary Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, 2001, pp. 151–175.doi:10 . 1090 / conm / 279 / 00713. arXiv:math - ph / 0003010 [math.ph] (cit. on p. 10). [Kos93] A. A. Kosinski.Differential Manifolds. Vol

    work page 2001

  16. [16]

    Edge current channels and Chern numbers in the integer quantum Hall effect

    Pure and Applied Mathematics. Aca- demic Press, 1993.isbn: 978-0-12-421850-5 (cit. on p. 32). [KRS02] J. Kellendonk, T. Richter, and H. Schulz-Baldes. “Edge current channels and Chern numbers in the integer quantum Hall effect”. In:Rev. Math. Phys.14.1 (2002), pp. 87– 119.doi:10.1142/S0129055X02001107(cit. on p. 3). [KS04] J. Kellendonk and H. Schulz-Bald...

    work page doi:10.1142/s0129055x02001107(cit 1993

  17. [17]

    Synthetic Geometry of Differential Equations: Jets and Comonad Structure

    arXiv:math - ph / 0405022 (cit. on p. 3). [KS26] I. Khavkine and U. Schreiber. “Synthetic Geometry of Differential Equations: Jets and Comonad Structure”. In:Journal of Geometry and Physics(2026). to appear. arXiv: 1701.06238 [math.DG](cit. on p. 38). [KSS26] S. Kallel, H. Sati, and U. Schreiber.Higher-Dimensional Anyons via Higher Cohomotopy. Jan

    work page arXiv 2026

  18. [18]

    Introduction to sh Lie algebras for physicists

    arXiv:2601.03150 [cond-mat.str-el](cit. on p. 10). [LS93] T. Lada and J. Stasheff. “Introduction to sh Lie algebras for physicists”. In:Int. J. Theor. Phys.32 (1993), pp. 1087–1103.doi:10.1007/BF00671791. arXiv:hep- th/9209099 [hep-th](cit. on p. 36). [LT80] L. L. Larmore and E. Thomas. “On the fundamental group of a space of sections”. In: Mathematica Sc...

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00671791 1993

  19. [19]

    An Elementary Introduction to the Hopf Fibration

    Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, 2009.isbn: 978-0691140490.url:https://press.princeton.edu/t itles/8957.html(cit. on p. 35). [Lyo03] D. W. Lyons. “An Elementary Introduction to the Hopf Fibration”. In:Mathematics Magazine76.2 (Apr. 2003), pp. 87–98.doi:10.1080/0025570x.2003.11953158. arXiv: 2212.01642 [math.HO](cit. on p. 30). [M...

    work page doi:10.1080/0025570x.2003.11953158 2009

  20. [20]

    T-Duality Simplifies Bulk-Boundary Correspondence

    IRMA Lectures in Mathematics and Theoretical Physics. Euro- pean Mathematical Society, 2015, pp. 111–136.doi:10.4171/153. arXiv:1308.6685 [math.AT](cit. on p. 37). [MM21] R. Moessner and J. E. Moore.Topological Phases of Matter — New Particles, Phenom- ena and Ordering Principles. Cambridge University Press, 2021.doi:10.1017/978131 6226308(cit. on p. 3). ...

    work page doi:10.4171/153 2015

  21. [21]

    Flux Quantization on Phase Space

    Grundlehren der mathematischen Wis- senschaften. Springer, 1994.isbn: 978-3-662-02998-5.doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02998 -5(cit. on p. 29). [SS24] H. Sati and U. Schreiber. “Flux Quantization on Phase Space”. In:Annales Henri Poincar´ e26 (May 2024), pp. 895–919.doi:10 . 1007 / s00023 - 024 - 01438 - x. arXiv: 2312.12517 [hep-th](cit. on p. 41). [SS25a] H. Sat...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-02998 1994

  22. [22]

    Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta

    Academic Press, 2025, pp. 281–324. isbn: 9780323957069.doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00078-1. arXiv:2312.125 17 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 35, 37, 40, 41). [SS25e] H. Sati and U. Schreiber. “Fractional Quantum Hall Anyons via the Algebraic Topology of Exotic Flux Quanta”. In: (2025). arXiv:2505.22144 [cond-mat.mes-hall](cit. on pp. 3, 9, 11, 17, 29). [SS25f] H...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00078-1 2025

  23. [23]

    Complete Topological Quantization of Higher Gauge Fields

    arXiv:2408.11896 [hep-th](cit. on pp. 9, 10). [SS26b] H. Sati and U. Schreiber. “Complete Topological Quantization of Higher Gauge Fields”. In:SciPost Physics Lecture Notes(2026). arXiv:2512.12431. arXiv:2512.12431 [hep-th] (cit. on pp. 28, 29). [SS26c] H. Sati and U. Schreiber.Equivariant Principal∞-Bundles. Cambridge University Press, 2026.isbn: 9781009...

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0305441 2026

  24. [24]

    Cartesian vs. Radial – A Comparative Evaluation of Two Visualization Tools

    Progress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser Basel, 2009, pp. 303–424.isbn: 978- 3-7643-8736-5.doi:10.1007/978- 3- 7643- 8736- 5_17. arXiv:0801.3480 [math.DG] (cit. on p. 36). [Sta20] T. D. Stanescu.Introduction to Topological Quantum Matter & Quantum Computation. CRC Press, 2020.isbn: 9780367574116.url:https://www.routledge.com/Introduc tion-to-Topological-Quan...

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2009

  25. [25]

    Topological Order: From Long-Range Entangled Quantum Matter to an Unification of Light and Electrons

    Elsevier, 2025, pp. 325–345.isbn: 978-0-323-95703-8. doi:10.1016/B978-0-323-95703-8.00262-7(cit. on p. 3). [Ton16] D. Tong.Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect. 2016.url:http://www.damtp.cam.ac .uk/user/tong/qhe.html(cit. on p. 11). [Wen13] X.-G. Wen. “Topological Order: From Long-Range Entangled Quantum Matter to an Unification of Light and Electrons”. In...

    work page doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95703-8.00262-7(cit 2025