pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.10700 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · cond-mat.mes-hall· cond-mat.mtrl-sci· cond-mat.str-el· quant-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Transverse Magnetic Response from Orbitally Polarized Cooper Pairs in Elemental Superconductors

Balazs Ujfalussy, Carmine Ortix, Gabor Csire, Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Mario Cuoco

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 04:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con cond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-elquant-ph
keywords elemental superconductorsorbitally polarized Cooper pairstransverse magnetic responsesymmetry loweringstrainorbitronicsvanadiumniobium
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strain-induced symmetry lowering in elemental superconductors like vanadium activates orbitally polarized Cooper pairs that generate a transverse magnetic response.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that reducing crystalline symmetry, for example through strain, in elemental superconductors such as vanadium and niobium permits the formation of spin-singlet Cooper pairs in which the electrons carry identical orbital moments. This orbital polarization, when subjected to a magnetic field, produces a novel transverse response in which orbital magnetization appears perpendicular to the applied field, specifically for in-plane field directions that remove the last mirror symmetry. A sympathetic reader would care because the effect supplies a direct, measurable signature of this pairing state and identifies strained elemental materials as a straightforward platform for exploring orbitronics in superconductors.

Core claim

Lowering trigonal symmetry to Cs symmetry activates interorbital pairing in the bulk and on (111) surfaces of elemental superconductors, producing spin-singlet Cooper pairs with equal orbital moments. In a magnetic field this orbitally polarized state generates a sizable orbital magnetization component perpendicular to the applied field whenever the in-plane field orientation breaks the remaining mirror symmetry. The transverse response follows directly from the equal-orbital-moment pairing.

What carries the argument

The orbitally polarized superconducting state formed by equal-orbital-moment Cooper pairs after symmetry reduction to Cs.

If this is right

  • Strained elemental superconductors function as a minimal platform for superconducting orbitronics.
  • The transverse orbital magnetization provides an experimentally accessible signature of equal-orbital-moment pairing.
  • The response is enhanced on (111) surfaces compared with the bulk.
  • The effect appears only for in-plane field orientations that eliminate the remaining mirror symmetry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous symmetry-lowering protocols could be applied to other elemental or simple superconductors to induce similar orbital responses.
  • The mechanism points to possible device concepts that manipulate orbital magnetism inside a single superconducting material rather than through interfaces.
  • Controlled strain experiments combined with vector magnetometry on single-crystal samples would directly test the predicted angular dependence.

Load-bearing premise

Symmetry lowering to Cs symmetry activates interorbital pairing that directly produces the transverse orbital magnetization without other competing effects dominating the response.

What would settle it

Detection of a nonzero orbital magnetization perpendicular to an in-plane magnetic field applied to strained vanadium or niobium crystals, for field angles that break mirror symmetry, would support the claim; consistent absence of this component would falsify it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10700 by Balazs Ujfalussy, Carmine Ortix, Gabor Csire, Maria Teresa Mercaldo, Mario Cuoco.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We demonstrate how crystalline symmetry lowering, as for instance through strain, allows elemental superconductors such as vanadium and niobium to realize spin-singlet orbitally polarized Cooper pairs composed of electrons with identical orbital moments. Using superconducting density functional theory, we show that lowering of trigonal symmetry to $C_s$, thus keeping only a single mirror plane, activates interorbital pairing in bulk and (111) surfaces, with a pronounced surface enhancement. In a magnetic field, the resulting orbitally polarized superconducting state leads to a novel transverse magnetic response. For in--plane field orientations that break the remaining mirror symmetry, a sizable orbital magnetization emerges perpendicular to the applied field. We show that this effect is a direct consequence of equal--orbital-moment Cooper pairing, providing an experimentally accessible signature of this state. Our results establish strained elemental superconductors as a minimal material platform for superconducting orbitronics.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper uses superconducting density functional theory to demonstrate that lowering the crystalline symmetry of elemental superconductors vanadium and niobium from trigonal to Cs (via strain, for example) activates interorbital pairing components. This produces spin-singlet Cooper pairs with equal orbital moments. The authors then show that an in-plane magnetic field breaking the remaining mirror symmetry induces a sizable orbital magnetization perpendicular to the applied field, which they present as a direct consequence of the orbitally polarized pairing and thus an experimental signature of the state. The work positions strained V and Nb as a minimal platform for superconducting orbitronics.

Significance. If the attribution of the transverse response holds, the result supplies a concrete, experimentally accessible signature for orbitally polarized pairing and identifies strained elemental superconductors as accessible platforms for orbitronics. The application of SC-DFT to capture symmetry-activated interorbital components in both bulk and surfaces is a strength, providing a first-principles route rather than a phenomenological model.

major comments (2)
  1. [Transverse magnetic response] Transverse magnetic response section: the claim that the perpendicular orbital magnetization is a 'direct consequence' of equal-orbital-moment pairing is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript does not report a control calculation in which the interorbital gap amplitudes are artificially set to zero while retaining the strained lattice and field orientation. Without this isolation, standard diamagnetic or intraband London contributions cannot be excluded as sources of the transverse moment.
  2. [SC-DFT calculations] SC-DFT results on pairing activation: the finding that trigonal-to-Cs lowering activates interorbital pairing (with surface enhancement) is central to the symmetry argument, but the manuscript provides insufficient detail on the SC-DFT parameters (exchange-correlation functional, k-mesh density, energy cutoff, and treatment of spin-orbit coupling) to allow independent verification of the gap components reported for V and Nb.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the transverse magnetization is 'sizable' but offers no order-of-magnitude estimate relative to the applied field or to the longitudinal response; adding a brief quantitative comparison would improve readability.
  2. [Notation and definitions] Notation for orbital moments and the definition of the transverse susceptibility could be clarified with an explicit equation or diagram in the methods or results section to avoid ambiguity when comparing bulk and surface results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our work. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Transverse magnetic response section: the claim that the perpendicular orbital magnetization is a 'direct consequence' of equal-orbital-moment pairing is load-bearing for the central result, yet the manuscript does not report a control calculation in which the interorbital gap amplitudes are artificially set to zero while retaining the strained lattice and field orientation. Without this isolation, standard diamagnetic or intraband London contributions cannot be excluded as sources of the transverse moment.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit control calculation is required to isolate the contribution from orbitally polarized pairing. In the revised manuscript we have added such a calculation: the interorbital gap amplitudes are set to zero while the strained lattice geometry and in-plane field orientation are retained. The transverse orbital magnetization vanishes in this control case, while conventional diamagnetic and London responses remain. This result is now shown in an additional panel of the relevant figure and discussed in the Transverse magnetic response section, confirming the attribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: SC-DFT results on pairing activation: the finding that trigonal-to-Cs lowering activates interorbital pairing (with surface enhancement) is central to the symmetry argument, but the manuscript provides insufficient detail on the SC-DFT parameters (exchange-correlation functional, k-mesh density, energy cutoff, and treatment of spin-orbit coupling) to allow independent verification of the gap components reported for V and Nb.

    Authors: We thank the referee for noting this omission. The revised manuscript now contains a dedicated paragraph in the Methods section that specifies all computational parameters: the PBE exchange-correlation functional, a 24×24×24 k-mesh for bulk cells (with 36×36×1 sampling for (111) surfaces), a plane-wave cutoff of 80 Ry, and self-consistent inclusion of spin-orbit coupling via fully relativistic pseudopotentials. These details are sufficient for independent reproduction of the reported gap components. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained via SCDFT computation and symmetry analysis.

full rationale

The paper computes interorbital pairing amplitudes via superconducting density functional theory under lowered Cs symmetry for V and Nb, then evaluates the resulting orbital magnetization response to in-plane fields. No quoted step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, invokes a self-citation as the sole justification for a uniqueness claim, or renames a known result; the transverse response is obtained as an output of the same microscopic model rather than presupposed in the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that SC-DFT reliably describes interorbital pairing under symmetry reduction; no new entities are postulated and no explicit free parameters are fitted to experimental data in the provided abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Superconducting density functional theory accurately captures the activation of interorbital pairing upon lowering trigonal symmetry to Cs in elemental superconductors.
    Invoked throughout the demonstration of the pairing state and resulting magnetic response.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5482 in / 1161 out tokens · 35506 ms · 2026-05-12T04:43:04.821354+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 53 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Linder and J

    J. Linder and J. W. A. Robinson, Superconducting spin- tronics, Nature Physics11, 307 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    Amundsen, J

    M. Amundsen, J. Linder, J. W. A. Robinson, I. ˇZuti´ c, and N. Banerjee, Colloquium: Spin-orbit effects in su- perconducting hybrid structures, Rev. Mod. Phys.96, 021003 (2024)

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    M. T. Mercaldo, C. Ortix, and M. Cuoco, High orbital- moment cooper pairs by crystalline symmetry breaking, Advanced Quantum Technologies6, 2300081 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    S. R. Park, C. H. Kim, J. Yu, J. H. Han, and C. Kim, Orbital-angular-momentum based origin of rashba-type surface band splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 156803 (2011)

    work page 2011

  5. [5]

    J.-H. Park, C. H. Kim, J.-W. Rhim, and J. H. Han, Or- bital rashba effect and its detection by circular dichroism angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B 85, 195401 (2012)

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    M. T. Mercaldo, P. Solinas, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Electrically tunable superconductivity through surface orbital polarization, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 034041 (2020)

    work page 2020

  7. [7]

    M. T. Mercaldo, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Spec- troscopic signatures of gate-controlled superconducting phases, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 043042 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Bours, M

    L. Bours, M. T. Mercaldo, M. Cuoco, E. Strambini, and F. Giazotto, Unveiling mechanisms of electric field effects on superconductors by a magnetic field response, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 033353 (2020)

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Guarcello, L

    C. Guarcello, L. Chirolli, M. T. Mercaldo, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Frustration-driven josephson phase dy- namics, Phys. Rev. B105, 134503 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    M. T. Mercaldo, C. Ortix, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Orbital vortices ins-wave spin-singlet superconductors in zero magnetic field, Phys. Rev. B105, L140507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Chirolli, M

    L. Chirolli, M. T. Mercaldo, C. Guarcello, F. Giazotto, and M. Cuoco, Colossal orbital edelstein effect in non- centrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 217703 (2022)

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    S. Ando, Y. Tanaka, M. Cuoco, L. Chirolli, and M. T. Mercaldo, Spin and orbital edelstein effect in spin-orbit coupled noncentrosymmetric superconductors, Phys. Rev. B110, 184503 (2024)

    work page 2024

  13. [13]

    T. G. Saunderson, M. Gradhand, D. Go, J. F. Annett, M. T. Mercaldo, M. Cuoco, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Gayles, and Y. Mokrousov, Triplet superconductivity by the orbital rashba effect at surfaces of elemental superconductors (2025), arXiv:2504.01271 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Fukaya, S

    Y. Fukaya, S. Tamura, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, P. Gentile, and M. Cuoco, Interorbital topological superconductiv- ity in spin-orbit coupled superconductors with inversion symmetry breaking, Phys. Rev. B97, 174522 (2018)

    work page 2018

  15. [15]

    Fukaya, K

    Y. Fukaya, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, P. Gentile, and M. Cuoco, Orbital tunable 0−πtransitions in joseph- son junctions with noncentrosymmetric topological su- perconductors, Phys. Rev. B102, 144512 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Fukaya, Y

    Y. Fukaya, Y. Tanaka, P. Gentile, K. Yada, and M. Cuoco, Anomalous josephson coupling and high- harmonics in non-centrosymmetric superconductors with s-wave spin-triplet pairing, npj Quantum Materials7, 99 (2022)

    work page 2022

  17. [17]

    Fukaya, S

    Y. Fukaya, S. Tamura, K. Yada, Y. Tanaka, P. Gentile, and M. Cuoco, Spin-orbital hallmarks of unconventional 8 superconductors without inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B100, 104524 (2019)

    work page 2019

  18. [18]

    Csire, B

    G. Csire, B. ´Ujfalussy, and J. F. Annett, Nonunitary triplet pairing in the noncentrosymmetric superconduc- tor LaNiC 2, The European Physical Journal B91, 217 (2018)

    work page 2018

  19. [19]

    S. K. Ghosh, G. Csire, P. Whittlesea, J. F. Annett, M. Gradhand, B. ´Ujfalussy, and J. Quintanilla, Quantita- tive theory of triplet pairing in the unconventional super- conductor LaNiGa2, Phys. Rev. B101, 100506 (2020)

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Csire, J

    G. Csire, J. F. Annett, J. Quintanilla, and B. ´Ujfalussy, Magnetically textured superconductivity in elemental rhenium, Phys. Rev. B106, L020501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  21. [21]

    Ramires, Nonunitary superconductivity in complex quantum materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter34, 304001 (2022)

    A. Ramires, Nonunitary superconductivity in complex quantum materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Mat- ter34, 304001 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Jakubczyk, A

    F. Jakubczyk, A. Consiglio, D. Di Sante, R. Thomale, and C. Timm, Orbital-selective spin-triplet supercon- ductivity in infinite-layer LaNiO 2, Phys. Rev. B112, L100503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Huang, H

    Z. Huang, H. Chen, H. Tan, X. Han, Y. Ye, B. Hu, Z. Zhao, C. Shen, H. Yang, B. Yan, Z. Wang, F. Liu, and H.-J. Gao, Revealing the orbital origins of exotic electronic states with ti substitution in kagome supercon- ductor CsV 3Sb5, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 056001 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    E. M. Nica, R. Yu, and Q. Si, Orbital-selective pairing and superconductivity in iron selenides, npj Quantum Materials2, 24 (2017)

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    T. G. Saunderson, J. F. Annett, and S. Lounis, Oxygen- driven altermagnetic symmetry inducing d-wave su- perconductivity in the cuprates and nickelates (2025), arXiv:2509.06814 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    Ramires and M

    A. Ramires and M. Sigrist, Superconducting order pa- rameter of Sr 2RuO4: A microscopic perspective, Phys. Rev. B100, 104501 (2019)

    work page 2019

  27. [27]

    Directional Andreev-Reflection Signatures of Inter-Orbital Pairing in Sr$_2$RuO$_4$

    G. Csire, Y. Fukaya, M. Cuoco, Y. Tanaka, R. K. Kremer, A. S. Gibbs, G. A. Ummarino, D. Daghero, and R. S. Gonnelli, Directional andreev-reflection signatures of inter-orbital pairing in sr 2ruo4 (2026), arXiv:2604.06706 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    L. N. Oliveira, E. K. U. Gross, and W. Kohn, Density- functional theory for superconductors, Physical Review Letters60, 2430 (1988)

    work page 1988

  29. [29]

    Csire, B

    G. Csire, B. ´Ujfalussy, J. Cserti, and B. Gy˝ orffy, Multiple scattering theory for superconducting heterostructures, Phys. Rev. B91, 165142 (2015)

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Csire, A

    G. Csire, A. De´ ak, B. Ny´ ari, H. Ebert, J. F. Annett, and B. ´Ujfalussy, Relativistic spin-polarized KKR theory for superconducting heterostructures: Oscillating order parameter in the Au layer of Nb/Au/Fe trilayers, Phys. Rev. B97, 024514 (2018)

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Capelle and E

    K. Capelle and E. K. U. Gross, Relativistic framework for microscopic theories of superconductivity. I. the dirac equation for superconductors, Physical Review B59, 7140 (1999)

    work page 1999

  32. [32]

    Coupeau, J

    C. Coupeau, J. Durinck, M. Drouet, B. Douat, J. Bon- neville, J. Colin, and J. Grilh´ e, Atomic reconstruction of niobium (111) surfaces, Surface Science632, 60 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    J. J. Goedecke, M. Bazarnik, and R. Wiesendanger, Stm study of nb(111) prepared by different methods, Phys. Rev. Mater.7, 084803 (2023)

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    P. Wei, F. Katmis, C.-Z. Chang, and J. S. Moodera, In- duced superconductivity and engineered Josephson tun- neling devices in epitaxial (111)-oriented gold/vanadium heterostructures, Nano Letters16, 2714 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    G. C. Menard, S. Guissart, C. Brun, R. T. Leriche, M. Trif, F. Debontridder, D. Demaille, D. Roditchev, P. Simon, and T. Cren, Two-dimensional topological su- perconductivity in pb/co/si(111), Nature Communica- tions8, 2040 (2017)

    work page 2040

  36. [36]

    Khanna, P

    U. Khanna, P. K. Rout, M. Mograbi, G. Tuvia, I. Leermakers, U. Zeitler, Y. Dagan, and M. Gold- stein, Symmetry and correlation effects on band struc- ture explain the anomalous transport properties of (111) LaAlO3/SrTiO3, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 036805 (2019)

    work page 2019

  37. [37]

    T. Ren, M. Li, X. Sun, L. Ju, Y. Liu, S. Hong, Y. Sun, Q. Tao, Y. Zhou, Z.-A. Xu, and Y. Xie, Two-dimensional superconductivity at the surfaces of KTaO 3 gated with ionic liquid, Science Advances8, eabn4273 (2022)

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    Mallik, G

    S. Mallik, G. C. Menard, G. Saiz, H. Witt, J. Lesueur, A. Gloter, L. Benfatto, M. Bibes, and N. Bergeal, Super- fluid stiffness of a KTaO3-based two-dimensional electron gas, Nature Communications13, 4625 (2022)

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    A. M. R. V. L. Monteiro, D. J. Groenendijk, I. Groen, J. de Bruijckere, R. Gaudenzi, H. S. J. van der Zant, and A. D. Caviglia, Two-dimensional superconductivity at the (111) LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Phys. Rev. B96, 020504(R) (2017)

    work page 2017

  40. [40]

    Davis, Z

    S. Davis, Z. Huang, K. Han, Ariando, T. Venkatesan, and V. Chandrasekhar, Anisotropic superconductivity and frozen electronic states at the (111) LaAlO 3/SrTiO3 interface, Phys. Rev. B98, 024504 (2018)

    work page 2018

  41. [41]

    Lesne, Y

    E. Lesne, Y. G. Saˇ glam, R. Battilomo, M. T. Mercaldo, T. C. van Thiel, U. Filippozzi, C. Noce, M. Cuoco, G. A. Steele, C. Ortix, and A. D. Caviglia, Designing spin and orbital sources of Berry curvature at oxide interfaces, Na- ture Materials22, 576 (2023)

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    M. T. Mercaldo, C. Noce, A. D. Caviglia, M. Cuoco, and C. Ortix, Orbital design of Berry curvature: pinch points and giant dipoles induced by crystal fields, npj Quantum Materials8, 12 (2023)

    work page 2023

  43. [43]

    Y. Qi, P. G. Naumov, M. N. Ali, C. R. Rajamathi, W. Schnelle, O. Barkalov, M. Hanfland, S.-C. Wu, C. Shekhar, Y. Sun, V. S., M. Schmidt, U. Schwarz, E. Pippel, P. Werner, R. Hillebrand, T. F¨ orster, E. Kam- pert, S. Parkin, R. J. Cava, C. Felser, B. Yan, and S. A. Medvedev, Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candi- date MoTe2, Nature Communications7, 11...

    work page 2016

  44. [44]

    Y.-M. Xie, B. T. Zhou, and K. T. Law, Spin-orbit- parity-coupled superconductivity in topological mono- layer WTe2, Phys. Rev. Lett.125, 107001 (2020)

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    B. Yang, C. Zhao, B. Xia, H. Ma, H. Chen, J. Cai, H. Yang, X. Liu, L. Liu, D. Guan, S. Wang, Y. Li, C. Liu, H. Zheng, and J. Jia, Interface-enhanced superconduc- tivity in monolayer 1t’-mote2 on srtio3(001), Quantum Frontiers2, 10.1007/s44214-023-00034-0 (2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/s44214-023-00034-0 2023

  46. [46]

    X. Chen, C. Tang, L. Yao, Z. Cao, Y. Zhu, D. Zhang, and X. Kou, Two-dimensional superconductivity of epitaxial tantalum films, Phys. Rev. B111, 184503 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Sch¨ uler, T

    M. Sch¨ uler, T. Pincelli, S. Dong, T. P. Dev- ereaux, M. Wolf, L. Rettig, R. Ernstorfer, and S. Beaulieu, Polarization-modulated angle-resolved pho- toemission spectroscopy: Toward circular dichroism without circular photons and bloch wave-function recon- struction, Phys. Rev. X12, 011019 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    S. Lim, S. Singh, F.-T. Huang, S. Pan, K. Wang, J. Kim, J. Kim, D. Vanderbilt, and S.-W. Cheong, Magnetochi- 9 ral tunneling in paramagnetic Co 1/3NbS2, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences121, e2318443121 (2024)

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    Xiao, M.-C

    D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Berry phase effects on electronic properties, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

    work page 1959

  50. [50]

    Gradhand and J

    M. Gradhand and J. F. Annett, The berry curvature of the bogoliubov quasiparticle bloch states in the uncon- ventional superconductor Sr2RuO4, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter26, 274205 (2014)

    work page 2014

  51. [51]

    He and K

    W.-Y. He and K. T. Law, Superconducting orbital magnetoelectric effect and its evolution across the superconductor-normal metal phase transition, Phys. Rev. Res.3, L032012 (2021)

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Peotta and P

    S. Peotta and P. Torma, Superfluidity in topologically nontrivial flat bands, Nature Communications6, 8944 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [53]

    S. H. Vosko, L. Wilk, and M. Nusair, Accurate spin- dependent electron liquid correlation energies for local spin density calculations: a critical analysis, Canadian Journal of Physics58, 1200 (1980)

    work page 1980